trieschmann, hoyt & sommer workers compensation and alternative risk financing chapter 12 ©2005...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer
Workers’ Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing
Chapter 12
©2005 Thomson/South-Western
![Page 2: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
22
Chapter Objectives
• State the different alternatives available to fund workers compensation losses and the relative importance of each alternative
• Describe how workers’ compensation insurance developed and identify recent trends in the field
• List coverages provided in a worker’s compensation policy • Calculate retrospective insurance premiums and
understand how a retrospective insurance plan can be used as an alternative to self-insuring workers’ compensation
• Determine the cash flow benefits of self-insuring workers’ compensation
• Identify all the functions a self-insurer must perform • Understand captive insurance companies and how risk
managers can use them
![Page 3: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
33
Workers’ Compensation Insurance
• Covers the loss of income and the medical and rehabilitation expenses that result from work-related accidents and occupational disease
• Single largest line of commercial insurance • Growth in workers’ compensation premiums was very high
during the 1970s but it slowed during the 1980s – In the early 1990s this line suffered significant losses – However, by the mid 1990s high investment returns had returned this
line to profitability • Intense price competition returned
• Developed in the latter half of the 1800s in Europe and in the early 1900s in the United States – Because of hardships placed on workers by common law
• A worker receives a guarantee of compensation – The employer is protected from employees seeking damages for work-
related injuries
![Page 4: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
44
Major Reform
• The National Commission on State Workmen’s Compensation laws was created to determine the extent to which state laws provided adequate, prompt, and equitable compensation to injured workers – Generally the studies raised doubts about the effectiveness of
workers’ compensation as it operated in the United States at the time the studies were made
• Since then state legislatures have passed numerous reforms to comply with the commission’s recommendations, including – Full coverage for medical care and rehabilitation – Adequate income replacement – Coverage of all workers – Cost-of-living adjustments – Improved data systems
![Page 5: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
55
Insurance Methods
• Three methods by which an employer can provide employees with the coverage required by law – Purchase a worker’s compensation and
employer’s liability policy from a private commercial insurer
– Purchase insurance through a state fund or a federal agency set up for this purpose
– Self-insure
![Page 6: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
66
Private Insurance
• The standard workers’ compensation and employer’s liability policy has two major insuring agreements– Coverage A
• To pay all claims required under the workers’ compensation law in the state where the injury occurred, including
– Occupational disease benefits, penalties assessable to the employer under law, and other obligations
– Coverage B• To defend all employees’ suits against the employer and pay any
judgment resulting from the suits – Employee suits are surprisingly frequent because methods are
constantly being found to bring an action against the employer in spite of the intention of the statutes to discourage such suits
• The insured deals directly with the employee and is primarily responsible to the employee for benefits – Thus, even if the employer should go out of business, the injured
employee’s security is not jeopardized
![Page 7: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
77
State Funds and Federal Agencies
• In 20 states, an employer has the choice of using a private insurer or a state fund as the insurer of workers’ compensation
• In five states, the employer does not have this choice– Must insure in an exclusive state fund or, in three of
those states, may self-insure
• In addition to state funds, federal agencies provide for workers’ compensation coverage
![Page 8: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
88
Self-Insurance
• In most states, under specified conditions, an employer is permitted to self-insure the workers’ compensation coverage
• Self-insurance is generally not permitted in Canada
• Self-insurers are generally large concerns with adequate diversification of risks and financial resources that enable them to qualify under the law
![Page 9: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
99
Evaluation of Insurance Methods
• Data from National Academy of Social Insurance show that – Private insurers incurred 55 percent– Self-insurers 23 percent– Federal and state funds 22 percent of the cost of workers’ compensation in 2001
• Private insurers are preferred by most employers in states where they’re permitted to operate
– Offer the employer an opportunity to insure in one contract all the liabilities likely for damages arising from work-connected injuries
– Private insurers offer more certainty in handling out-of-state risks – While the expenses of state funds are somewhat lower than those of private
insurers • The difference is not as great as rough comparisons often lead one to believe
– Self-insurance has the handicap that it is necessary for the insured to enter the insurance business
• Which is essentially unrelated to the insured’s main operations • Also, contributions to a self-insurance fund are often not tax deductible
– Experience rating and retrospective rate plans enable large firm to use a private insurer’s facility in transferring as much or as little of the risk as is desired at a modest cost
![Page 10: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
1010
Employment Covered
• Compensation laws do not cover all workers – For example, domestic labor and farm labor are often excluded – Employers with only a few employees are excluded under
compulsory laws • Only about 9 out of 10 workers are covered • Liability suits are necessary if an excluded worker is to
recover anything – Even though a basic purpose of compensation legislation was to
eliminate this condition as a prerequisite for employee recoveries • It is a small employer who is excluded from compensation
laws and who is most likely to be the object of such suits – This often means that
• A successful suit will bankrupt the employer • If the employer is more or less judgment-proof, the injured worker will
recover nothing
![Page 11: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
1111
Income Provisions
• Compensation laws recognize four types of disability for which income benefits may be paid – Permanent and temporary total disability – Permanent and temporary partial disability
• Generally limit payments by specifying the maximum duration of benefits and the maximum weekly and aggregate amounts payable
![Page 12: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
1212
Income Provisions• For permanent total disability benefits, most states permit lifetime
payments to the injured worker who is unable to perform the duties of any suitable occupation
• In the remaining states, typical limitation is between 400 and 500 weeks of payments – There is often a limitation on the aggregate amount payable
• A common limitation that income benefits cannot exceed about 2/3 of the worker’s average weekly wage or some dollar amount
• Weekly benefits for temporary total disability are usually the same as for permanent total disability – Except that often there is a lower maximum aggregate limitation and a
shorter time duration for such payments • Most workers’ compensation laws specify the lump sums may be
paid to a worker as liquidating damages for a disability – Such as the loss of a leg or an eye
• Loss is permanent but does not totally incapacitate the worker
![Page 13: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
1313
Survivor Benefits
• In the case of fatal injuries, the widow or widower and children of the worker are entitled to funeral and income benefits – Subject to various limitations
• The maximum benefits to the widow or widower are generally less than they would have been to the disabled worker – But if the survivor has children, these benefits are comparable to
what the worker would have received for permanent total disability
• Highway crashes represent the single largest cause of workplace deaths– Accounting for ¼ of all fatalities in workers’ compensation
![Page 14: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
1414
Medical Benefits
• Most workers’ compensation laws provide relatively complete medical services to an injured worker – Including allowances for certain occupational
diseases
• In all jurisdictions unlimited medical care is provided for accidental work injuries – And broad coverage for occupational disease
is provided
![Page 15: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
1515
Rehabilitation Benefits
• Provided by most states
• Generally recognized that the quantity and quality of the services are subject to wide variation
• Federal Vocational Rehabilitation Act includes federal funds to aid states in vocational rehabilitation of individuals who are injured in the workplace
![Page 16: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
1616
Benefits
• There is great variability between the states
• Table 12-1 shows descriptive statistics for some states
• A Federal Employees Compensation plan covers federal employees – It has the highest benefit of any plan
![Page 17: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
1717
Table 12-1: State Workers’ Compensation Provisions
![Page 18: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
1818
Experience Rating • Widely used in workers’ compensation insurance • General theory is that an employer has some control over the
loss ratio and is entitled to a credit for good loss record – Or should pay a higher rate if the loss record is poorer than average
• The details of the plan are very complex – General procedure is to determine, for each occupational class, some
expected loss ratio against which the insured’s actual loss ratio is compared
• Not all losses suffered by an insured are counted – The plan uses a stabilizing factor so that unusually large losses cannot
operate to increase the small employer’s rate unreasonably – For the large employer, the employer’s loss experience becomes more
important as its expected losses become greater • Experience rating in workers’ compensation gives employers an
incentive to do whatever is within their control to prevent accidents
![Page 19: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
1919
Retrospective Rating
• Entirely voluntary agreement between the insured and the insurer
• If the employer’s payroll is such that a standard of premium of $1,000 or more is incurred – Is considered that the firm is large enough to develop experience
that is partially credible
• Standard premium is defined as what the employer would have paid at manual rates after adjustment for experience rating – But before any adjustment for retrospective rating
• In practice, an employer likely to use retrospective rating is generally considerably larger than this
![Page 20: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
2020
Retrospective Rating• There are various plans of retrospective rating
– The employer must choose one – Which plan should the employer choose?
• Essentially, this question reduces to one of how much risk the employer is willing to assume
• The basic retrospective rating formula is given by – R = [BP + (L)(LCF)]TM
• R = retrospective premium payable for the year in question • BP = a basic premium designed to cover fixed costs of the insurer • L = losses actually suffered by the employer • LCF = loss conversion factor designed to cover the variable cost of the insurer • TM = tax multiplier designed to reflect the premium tax levied by the state of
the insurer’s business – The basic premium declines as the size of the employer increases
• Differs with the type of plan used – The formula is subject to the operation of certain minimums and
maximums • Both of which decline as the size of the employer increases
![Page 21: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
2121
Risk Management and Workers’ Compensation • Workers’ compensation is one of the most
frequently self-insured coverages in the risk management area
• Characterized by relatively high-frequency and low-severity losses
• In recent years, the motivation to self-insure a portion or all of this exposure has increased – Due to rapidly rising premium levels
• When premiums are high, the cash flow benefits of self-insurance are greater
– Self-insurance becomes more attractive
![Page 22: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
2222
Factors Favoring Self-Insurance
• Lower administrative expenses – When a firm establishes a self-insured workers’ compensation
program, it eliminates most of the premium paid to an insurer • Cash flow benefits
– Probably greater than the cost saving aspects of self-insuring workers’ compensation
– Under a traditional insured plan, the insured pays the premium • And at some later date the insurer pays all the claims
– In the aggregate, this arrangement provides the insurance company with a large amount of money that can be invested in income-producing securities until the claims are paid
– When a firm self-insurers, it holds the money until the claims are paid
• As it takes several years to pay all the claims from a given year’s loss exposure
– The self-insurer has the use of some of the funds for a fairly long time – There’s a perpetual sum available for investment in securities or in the self-
insured’s own operations
![Page 23: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
2323
Factors Favoring Self-Insurance
• Claims-conscious management – Management often becomes more claims
conscious when it is paying directly for workers’ compensation losses
– When insurers are paying the claims, only an indirect effect is seen by operating managers
– As a consequence, workers’ compensation losses often decline when a firm initiates a self-insurance program
![Page 24: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
2424
Factors Against Self-Insurance
• Size of firm – A company must be financially capable of retaining self-insured
losses – It must have a large enough exposure so that it can predict
much of its losses – Generally, a firm with an annual premium of less than $250,000
will not self-insure
• Stability of workforce – Concerns how much turnover of the firm has and how rapidly it
is expanding – Newly employed people, as well as younger employees, have
higher accident rates than more mature workers – New plants tend to have higher accident rates than established
ones
![Page 25: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
2525
Factors Against Self-Insurance
• Tax consequences – Under a self-insured program, one cannot take a tax
deduction until the funds are actually paid
• Availability of services – When a firm self-insures, it must provide or purchase
services that were formally provided by the insurance company
– These services include • Loss control activities, claims adjusting, data processing, and
program administration
– A firm can usually buy these services from companies that specialize in such activities
![Page 26: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
2626
Excess Insurance
• Most companies do not completely self-insure the workers’ compensation exposure – Because of the catastrophic nature of certain types of workers’
compensation losses – Such claims as long-term disability or death may add up to
hundreds of thousands of dollars • To prevent such circumstances, self-insurers purchase excess
insurance
• Basic types of excess insurance – Specific
• The self-insurer absorbs the first x dollars on any loss – Aggregate excess
• The policy operates like an aggregate deductible • Typically, the aggregate limit is at least the level of what the
workers’ compensation premiums would have been if insurance had been purchased
![Page 27: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
2727
Potential Problems
• Problems include, but are not limited to – Financial ability to retain losses– A large enough exposure base to be able to predict
losses accurately – Actual management of the plan – Establishment of a loss prevention and protection
program – Management of a risk management information
system – Availability of excess-of-loss insurance – Top management commitment to the plan
![Page 28: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
2828
Alternative Workers’ Compensation Risk Financing Strategies • Various financing plans for workers’ compensation
programs often use a letter of credit issued by a financial institution on behalf of the insured
• By using this approach, an insured obtains maximum cash flow and tax benefits
• However, there are caveats that need to be considered – Each year a letter of credit must be issued
• Letters of credit cost money and they’re more expensive than they used to be
– The firm’s overall debt limit could be adversely affected – IRS is taking a tougher position on plans where the insured tries
to take a tax deduction for the full premium but pays only a small part in cash
![Page 29: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
2929
Alternative Workers’ Compensation Risk Financing Strategies• Alternative financing strategies include
such programs as – Investment credit
• Require one to pay the full premium in cash at the beginning of the year, but give the insured investment earnings from the premiums
– Compensating balance • Reduce the firm’s obligations to banks that lend
money to the insured
![Page 30: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
3030
Captive Insurance Companies
• General, auto, and product liability cases can give rise to large awards – For example, Domino’s Pizza, Inc., lost a lawsuit
concerning an auto accident in which one of its delivery persons ran a red light and injured someone
• Part of the evidence involved Domino’s promise to deliver pizza in 30 minutes and that drivers were not driving in a reasonable manner
• The jury returned a verdict for $78 million – A captive insurance arrangement would have been useful in
financing the loss
![Page 31: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
3131
Special Tax Status of Insurance Companies • Insurance companies are the only type of company that
can establish loss reserves and take a tax deduction for the loss’s accrual
• Other corporations can take tax deductions for loss only after the loss has been paid
• Insurance companies can pre-fund losses with pretax dollars – A manufacturer must use after-tax dollars
• If a risk manager could create an insurance company or an organization that would pass the IRS definition of an insurance company – Pretax dollars could be used to fund self-insured losses of his or
firm
![Page 32: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
3232
Operation of a Captive • Captive insurer
– A subsidiary formed by a company that is called a parent • It is a captive of the parent because the parent controls it
• Captive insurance companies became very popular in the 1960s and 1970s
• A firm paid a premium to the subsidiary and took the deduction – The captive recorded the premium as revenue and increased its loss
reserve by almost an equal amount • So the captive did not show a profit
– Resulted in a 100 percent tax deduction for the parent • The captive held the funds; it did not earn a profit, so did not pay any income
taxes • IRS began to challenge this arrangement in the courts
– Rule slowly involved that a parent could not take the deduction unless a subsidiary had a significant amount of non-related risks
• The rule required a significant number of exposures that were not part of the parent organization
![Page 33: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
3333
Onshore Versus Offshore Captives
• Creating a captive insurance company in the United States is not a difficult task – But it is relatively expensive
• Most states have minimum capital requirements that can run as high as several million dollars
• An onshore captive is subject to the state laws in which it is incorporated
• However offshore captives are not subject to such restrictive regulatory laws – Little upfront money is needed to start offshore captives – Offshore captives have very favorable income tax laws
![Page 34: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
3434
Other Attributes of Captives
• When a firm writes its insurance in a captive – It can write the policy exactly the way it wishes
• Often the risk manager of the parent firm is the CEO of the captive – So the parent can make the insurance policy as liberal as it
desires • For some firms that have sought to manage risk on a
broader enterprise-wide basis– Captives have offered a useful tool for financing risks that have
not traditionally been addressed in the insurance market • Such risks include reputation risk, branded risk, residual value risk
on vehicle leases, and weather risk
• In 2003 some firms begin to fund employee benefits through their captives
![Page 35: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
3535
Other Attributes of Captives
• Regulatory restraints on investments are less – Captive can invest its funds almost any way it wishes
• Captive insurance companies can have direct contact with reinsurers
• It is through reinsurance that captives can serve as a funding vehicle for self-insured plans and reduce the probability of catastrophic losses
![Page 36: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
3636
Potential Problems of Captives
• Demand time and energy of the risk manager • Require the firm to incorporate the captive either on- or
offshore – Which takes time and money
• The firm must have enough of a loss exposure to warrant these expenses – For this reason companies often group together to form
association or industry captives • If a parent creates a single-owner captive the tax
deductibility of payments will be problematic – IRS may require a substantial amount of unrelated business
• One advantage of the association or industry captive is that it has diverse ownership and insures a significant amount of unrelated business
![Page 37: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
3737
Potential Problems of Captives• Hard reinsurance markets may make it difficult for the captive to
reinsure its business – Without reinsurance, the captive can be a very dangerous undertaking
• Sometimes it is difficult for the risk manager to justify the continued use of a captive in extremely soft markets – The temptation may arise to shut down the captive because insurance is
so cheap – However, it is important for the risk manager to have continuity in his or
her own risk management program • Changing from insurance to a captive and then back again can break the
continuity of the plan and cost more money • Financial officers often dislike captives because once money is
placed or funds accumulate in a captive – It is difficult to obtain the money except for risk management purposes
• Table 12-5 shows the most popular locations for captive insurance companies
![Page 38: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Workers Compensation and Alternative Risk Financing Chapter 12 ©2005 Thomson/South-Western](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061306/55146c5c550346414e8b5e62/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
3838
Table 12-5: Most Popular Locations for Captive Insurance Companies, 2002