trim tab v.2 - spring 2009

1trim tab

CASCADIA’S MAGAZINE FOR TRANSFORMATIVE PEOPLE + DESIGN 02 QUARTER 2009

issue 002cascadiagbc.org

TRANSFORMATIONAL THOUGHT:

DeNSITy & SUSTAINAbILITy A RAdicAl PeRsPective

Miller | Hull’s

DIScOveRy ceNTeR at South Lake union

TRANSFORMATIONAL DeSIGN:

TRANSFORMATIONAL PeOPLe:

THOMAS cRUM A coAch foR the Mind,heARt And sPiRit

ALSO:

leAdeRshiP: ScARce ReSOURce OR vAST ReSeRvOIR?

second Quarter 20092

editor in Chief Jason F. Mclennan [email protected]

exeCutive editor David r. Macaulay [email protected]

Managing editor Jenny seifert [email protected]

ProduCtion Chief Bob Potter [email protected]

Creative direCtor erin Gehle

[email protected]

advertiSing sarah Costello [email protected]

ContributorS Kira Gould, Bill Walsh, Paul Werder

For editorial inquiries or freelance submissions, contact Jenny seifert at [email protected]

For photography submissions, contact Bob Potter at [email protected] For advertising, contact sarah Costello at [email protected]

Back issues or reprints: Contact [email protected]

SPring 2009, iSSue 2

Trim Tab is a quarterly publication of the Cascadia region Green Building Council, a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization. Office locations: 721 NW 9th Ave suite 280, Portland, Or 97209; 410 Occidental Ave south, seattle, WA 98105; 1100-111 Dunsmuir street, Vancouver, BC V6B 6A3.

All rights reserved. Content may not be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission and is for informational purposes only.


south lake union Discovery Center: Here Today, A Green Tomorrowby DAVID R. MACAULAy

A design for portability, adaptability and sustainability

TRANSFORMATIONAL PeOPLe:

Thomas Crum: A Coach for the Mind, Heart and spiritby JENNy SEIFERT

A conversation with a conflict resolution and stress management expert…and John Denver’s former bodyguard

cOLUMN:

Toxic Assetsby bILL WALSh

Investing in green labels is fueling ecological collapse

DePArTMeNTs05


05

13

18

3trim tab

05

SECOND QUARTER 2009

26

contents

MOvING UPSTReAM: Progress in the Bioregion

PRODUcT SPOTLIGHT: leap, Think, Amia, siento – seating

bOOk RevIew: integrated Design: Mithun by DAVID R. MACAULAy, REVIEWED by KIRA GOULD

event Calendar

TRANSFORMATIONAL THOUGHT:

Density and sustainability—A radical Perspective by JASON F. MCLENNAN

Challenging the wisdom of exaggerated height and density in urban structures

FeATures NuTs & BOlTsTRANSFORMATIONAL THOUGHT:

13 TRANSFORMATIONAL PeOPLe:

26

38

35Moving Upstream

35

37

38

40

LeADeRSHIP:

scarce resource or Vast reservoir? by PAUL WERDER

How passion and the power of the individual can make transformative change

20

5trim tab

STORy by DAVID R. MACAULAy

A MODULAR, MOvAbLe “PAvILION IN THe PARk” SeTS THe SUSTAINAbLe TONe FOR A Re-eMeRGING SeATTLe LAkeFRONT NeIGHbORHOOD

South Lake Union Discovery Center: Here TODAy, A GreeN TOMOrrOW

ON ThE MOVE: Once its mission is complete, the sales/community center will be completely disassembled and relocated to another, nearby site in 20- by 60-foot sections.

© LARA SWIMMER


POrTABiliTy. reAsseMBly. ADAPTiVe reuse. A temporary, demountable building may represent the highest form of sustainability. A place for people that sits lightly on the land and serves as a showcase for sustain-able design – those objectives and more were achieved in Seattle’s South Lake Union Discovery Center.

Completed in March 2005, this modular, 11,100-square-foot “pavilion in the park” was designed to be separated, moved, reassembled and reused in future locations. Thanks to its innovative design and construction, this project was honored as an AIA Committee on the Environment Top Ten Green Project for 2008, as well as 2007 winner of the Lifecycle Building Challenge, a competition that rec-ognizes high-performance buildings designed to facilitate adaptability and materials reuse.

The SLU Discovery Center has quickly become the cen-terpiece of a 60-acre, mixed-use redevelopment led by Vulcan, Inc. to transform South Lake Union into a sus-tainable community. This urban neighborhood, adjacent

to downtown Seattle, is filled with unique architecture of the working 1920s: warehouses built for manufacturing, storage and service. Buildings typically feature post and beam construction, with excellent examples of terra cotta and ornate brick patterns. Today, within sight of the lake-front, the area is also home to research centers, colleges, urban lofts and parks.

Located at the busy corner of Westlake and Denny, the Discovery Center serves as both a community space and sales center. In the middle of the building, potential buy-ers can see mockups of the newest residential units while visitors tour exhibits of the neighborhood’s history and visualize plans for its ultimate buildout. As a benefit to residents, the center also becomes a place for receptions, private meetings and community events. The center rests on the eastern edge of a full-block urban park, a gift to the City of Seattle for the next 10 years until the site is fully developed, featuring a soccer field and basketball court.

THe PARADIGM, SHIFTeDVulcan selected Seattle’s Miller|Hull Partnership, LLP to lead the design of this pavilion. Since establishing the practice in 1977, principals David Miller and Robert Hull have gained a reputation for public architecture: commu-nity centers, city halls, branch libraries, and private schools. “But equal to that, we’ve tried to make all of our build-ings environmentally responsible,” says Miller. “It’s been

SUSTAINAbLE CENTER: The SLU Discovery Center is located in the midst of an emerging neighborhood of residential communities, offices, and nearby private schools.

© LARA SWIMMER

7trim tab

part of our DNA.” Among their most notable projects are the Seattle Center Fisher Pavilion and the Conibear Shellhouse Renovation & Addition (rowing facility) at the University of Washington.

With Miller|Hull and the rest of the SLU project team in place by 2004, the client made clear their plans for the new pavilion: the building would need to be moved eventually to a nearby site and resume its primary role as a sales, infor-mation and community space. Sales centers for residential developments like this typically have very short lifespans, since they disappear after construction is complete and the units sold. The modular nature of the project, therefore, would allow it to serve for a much longer period of time.

The idea of a portable building struck Miller as a “very unusual request from an owner”:

“In fact, in my 35 years of practice, this was the first time I’d ever been asked to design a building that could be moved to another site. Often, we think we can de-sign a building that could be expanded, taken apart and

reconfigured – but never totally disconnected from its site and moved elsewhere and reassembled. So that was a great challenge. Immediately, we knew that we had something we could build a conceptual idea around that would be unique, while making a point about how a building typically thought of as temporary…with a five-year lifespan…could be extended out to become a 50- or 75-year building.”

A MODULAR SOLUTIONMiller and his team explored a series of alternatives, start-ing with the idea of trailerable units that could be ganged together. The general contractor, GLY Construction of Bellevue, offered vital input early in the process. Together, they realized the constraints of the trailer module “was holding us back,” he notes, “so we started looking at this idea of a modular structure that could be taken apart in sections.” Finally, they arrived at a solution. Relying on prefab pattern language and a 45-by-110-foot maximum module spec from a local building mover, the design team devised a modular system of four structural bays each formed by a hoop of custom steel components.

MATERIALS WITh RECyCLED CONTENT All structural steel utilizes a minimum of 90 percent recycled steel content•high fly-ash content concrete was used with the highest reasonable fly-ash ratio (50 percent at footings and •piers, 30 percent at exposed slabs)Recycled concrete rubble (500 cubic yards) was used as the sub-grade base at the parking area•Trex® decking was used at all exterior decking areas•Other finish materials with recycled content include the carpeting, GWb, Marmoleum® flooring, and the Arm-•strong® ceiling tile

ENVIRONMENTALLy-RESPONSIbLE MATERIALS OSb sheathing and LSL blocking was utilized throughout the project as the roof sheathing system•OSb panels were used at the exhibit and display kiosks•Glued-laminated wood purlins were used for the roof structure•

“I’m most proud of the way the Discovery Center responds to its program. For us, the program should represent the key issues you extract from the client’s aspirations and unique requirements, and the site ecology that exists. What can you learn from those to develop a strong concept? Sometimes it’s a huge struggle, and we don’t get the big breakthrough…but on this one, we were able to do that.”

— DAVID MILLER, PRINCIPAL AND LEAD DESIGNER, ThE MILLER|hULL PARTNERShIP


Vulcan had a second major request for the building as well: that its design clearly express Pacific Northwest Region-alism. While Miller|Hull’s previous body of work didn’t include many multi-family residential or large office build-ing projects, the firm was quite familiar with this style; in fact, Miller was just starting to write his book, Toward a New Regionalism: Environmental Architecture in the Pa-cific Northwest (University of Washington Press, 2005) at the time. “What is unique to residential and small clinics and office buildings done in late 1950s and 1960s around Seattle were these light on the land, wood-frame post-and-beam, very transparent/very breatheable buildings,” he points out.

DeSIGN FOR ADAPTAbILITyThe Discovery Center’s primary program requirement was to create a building and core with an adaptable interior exhibit space. The space could then be reconfigured and reused for the presentation of multiple residential neigh-borhoods throughout South Lake Union over a number of years. This flexibility has made it possible for the ex-hibit space to be re-fitted since its initial construction so the developer could present a new series of residential communities coming on-line.

In addition to creating a flexible interior space, the build-ing itself is demountable. The building envelope effec-tively incorporates three disconnect joints to break the structure into four equal modules (each 40 feet in width

and 73 feet in length). Each modular assembly is then capable of being moved to a new location in the future, reconnected, and reused – either in its current capacity or as an adaptive reuse project. All interior and exterior finishes and assemblies have a joint at this break point, covered by a removable plate, cap, or coping to suit each surface or location.

The building’s demountable features are visible inside the center through use of narrow aluminum closure plates on the floor and wall surfaces where they cross the dis-connect joints. Barrier-free access to the main entrance and the catering kitchen is maintained through gangway ramps with integrated hinged joints, allowing the ramps to adapt to the topography of future building locations. The linear service bar component, housing the service functions of the pavilion, faces the park and is clad with softer wood materials and colors to blend in with the adjacent park. Expansive floor-to-ceiling glass along the street facade also opens the interior of the building to the sidewalk and streetscape, inviting pedestrians to visit the free exhibits inside. The wood roof structure canti-levers over the steel frame to provide a broad eave and protection from the elements.

SUSTAINAbLe SHOwcASeThrough close collaboration with Vulcan, which has long demonstrated a commitment to sustainable design prac-tices, Miller and his team were able to incorporate wide ranging environmental strategies into the project. These

[RIGhT] TEMPORARy hOME: Today at the corner of Westlake and Denny, the Center sits light on the land – atop short concrete piers, ensuring that the sloping terrain and vegetation underneath are not disturbed.

[FAR RIGhT] EXhIbIT SPACE: Inviting and light-filled, the Discovery Center draws visitors to displays of the area’s past and a model of plans for the future of South Lake Union. Interior materials feature more than 80 percent recycled content within a raw, industrial, high-tech envelope.

©LARA SWIMMER

9trim tab

included: off-site prefabrication for greater construction efficiencies, daylighting, storm water management with on-site bio-retention swales, and recycled and environ-mentally-responsible building materials.

THe SITe

The center takes a minimalist approach to the 79,290-square-foot lot. Its structure sits lightly on the land, preserving the gently sloping terrain atop short concrete piers. Building edges are cantilevered, allowing the grade and vegetation to run uninterrupted beneath.

MATeRIALS

Several factors drove the selection of materials, includ-ing durability, recycled content and environmental re-sponsibility – as well as an ability to support the project’s demountable requirements. The structure is comprised of four-sided steel bents, paired with bolted connec-tions to free-span the interior gallery and exhibit space. Together with the use of GLB wood purlins and OSB sheathing, this decision allowed for most of the struc-ture to be pre-fabricated off-site and complete the fin-ishes within a controlled environment. The steel frames incorporate shop-welded rigid corner connections with splice plates and exposed bolted connections at the ver-tical components of the bents. All finish-painted frame components were then transported to the site, joisted into place, and spliced together quickly and efficiently.

The roof framing system features glued-laminated

beam purlins at 4-feet on center, spanning 20 feet from frame-to-frame; oriented-strand-board sheathing spans perpendicularly across the purlins without the need for any intermediate joist framing. Environmentally-re-sponsible materials included: 500 cubic yards of recy-cled concrete used as sub-base at the parking area; con-crete containing fly ash; composite decking planks with recycled content at exterior decking areas; paper-based countertops, partitions, and exhibit display casework; oriented-strand board and laminated-strand lumber; li-noleum; and carpet with recycled content.

wATeR cONSeRvATION AND USe

The project utilizes a variety of techniques to manage storm water runoff, with an emphasis on low-impact design strategies to slow and filter the water on site so no new detention tanks were necessary. In addition, high-efficiency toilets and waterless urinals reduce the project’s water use to just 45,000 gallons per year — a 15 percent reduction in internal water use, compared with a typical building of this type.

eNeRGy

Electrical, lighting and mechanical systems are each contained within the 40-foot modules for practical dis-assembly and reassembly. The electrical system spans the entire building, but the main electrical conduit be-low the floor incorporates a disconnect junction box beneath each of the three separation joints so that only one electrical connection needs to be severed

© LARA SWIMMER


and reestablished when the building is disassembled and moved. The building also utilizes air-source heat pumps for heating and cooling.

INDOOR eNvIRONMeNT

One of the goals for the SLU Discovery Center was to create a building with abundant daylighting. East-facing, full-height glass fills the interior with comfortable, ambi-ent daylight throughout the day. The glass façade slopes inward as it reaches the highest point of the structure, while the exposed roof above slopes down toward the west, allowing daylight to reach deep into the space.

NeXT LIFeHas this project in any way changed Miller|Hull’s approach to design? “Yes,” responds David Miller. Modular build-ing techniques may be applied to a new wetlands research

DAve MAcAULAy is author of integrated Design: Mithun (ecotone Publishing, 2008) and co-author of The ecological engineer: KeeN engineering (ecotone Publishing, 2005) and a contributor to AiA COTenotes, Greensource magazine, and other publications.

SLU DISCOVERy CENTER: JUST ThE FACTS

LOCATION: SeattlebUILDING TyPE(S): Commercial office, Community/New

construction/11,000 sq. feetCOMPLETED: March 2005ARChITECT: The Miller | hull Partnership, SeattleCLIENT/OWNER: Vulcan Real Estate, SeattleCONTRACTOR: GLy Construction, bellevueCONSULTANTS: Magnusson Klemencic Associates,

Seattle (civil and structural engineer); brumbaugh and Associates, Seattle (landscape architect); MICE North America, Phoenix (interiors); Candela, Seattle (lighting); Universal Mechanical, Mukilteo, Wash. (mechanical/plumbing contractor); Cochran Electric, Seattle (electrical contractor)

AWARDS AND RECOGNITION 2008 AIA/COTE National Top Ten Green Projects Gold, best Pavilion, National Assoc. of home builders 2007 Lifecycle building Challenge, building Category Sustainable Design Award, boston Society of Arch’s.

and education center for Cascadia Community College in Bothell – the largest restored site in Washington, located right on campus. But instead of moving the structure, its adaptable design will enable the building to add more bays as funding becomes available.

“We’re also exploring the idea of less welding with steel and more bolted connections,” he adds. “This makes it easier to take a building apart and reconfigure it in the future, if necessary, rather than having to break welds or grind up materials.”

Someday soon, on a quiet Sunday afternoon in South Lake Union, expect to see an entire building, separated into 20- by 60-foot sections – exhibits, offices, bathrooms, a cater-ing kitchen, a conference room, a standing seam roof – on trailers slowly moving down Westlake Avenue to a new location. Ready for reuse. Ready for its next life.

© MILLER|hULL

GREEN BROKERGreen Broker is a new and exciting conference designed for the commercial real estate and financial communities, and for anyone looking for a solid introduction to the future of the building industry: green building.

Get up to speed with green design

Learn the financial benefits of building and leasing green

Network with leaders in the field

Meet green building and valuation experts from across the region

Learn about the new Certified Green Broker Education Course

Jerry Yudelson: Jerry has spoken about green building all over the U.S., as well as in Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. His speeches and workshops motivate people to understand the business case for building and developing green.

Jason F. McLennan: Author, award-winning designer and CEO of Cascadia Region Green Building Council, Jason delivers vision and pragmatism, a winning combination for tough economic and environmental times.

09.17.09 – Seattle, WA – Seattle Center, Olympic and Rainier Rooms 1st Ave. N. & Republican

•

•

•

•

•

REGISTER TODAY

FOR YOUR

INTRODUCTION TO

THE GREEN BUILDING

UNIVERSE

THE GREEN BROKER

CONFERENCE AND THE

CERTIFIED GREEN BROKER

PROGRAM ARE BOTH

PRESENTED BY

09.17.09

Sponsor Green Broker and connect with a dynamic audience of brokers, building

managers and other real estate professionals.

CERTI

FIED GREENBRO

KER

CERTIFIED GREEN BROKER©

CERTIFIED GREEN BROKERS STAND OuT IN A CROwDED FIELD

The Certified Green Broker program prepares brokers and other real estate professionals to take a leadership role in the burgeoning green building marketplace.

we’ve created ten three-hour online seminars, for a total of 30 hours of real estate CEus. Become a Certified Green Broker by participating in ten sessions and taking a two-hour exam.

Visit www.greenbrokereducation.com for more information.

REGISTER NOW!take advantage of early registration rates

LEARN ABOUT SPONSORSHIP

CLICKfor more

info

If there is rigid PVC piping in your community water system, you and your family could be exposed to bacteria, lead and other toxins.

PVC has been banned by:

The City of San FranciscoThe City of SeattleMicrosoftTargetWalmart

Go to www.CleanWaterPipeCouncil.org to learn more about the potential health and environmental impacts of rigid PVC in your community water system.

WHAT’S IN YOUR WATER?

CLICKfor more info about this important issue

13trim tab

Dennis Wilde: An evangelist for Change

Thomas Crum: A Coach for the Mind, Heart and SpiritThomas Crum’s journey to becoming an expert in effective stress management and conflict resolution, like his teachings, has been a journey of the mind, heart and spirit. Just out of college, with a wife, newborn child, and a degree in math and education, Tom took a job as a systems analyst with a multi-national company. Within a year he felt his soul was being sucked out of him. So he and his family packed their VW van and followed their hearts, landing in Aspen, Colorado. There, Tom taught at an alternative charter school and started the Aspen Academy of Martial Arts, where he studied and taught Aikido and meditation. Singer John Denver became one of his students and a personal friend, and by the mid-seventies he was traveling the world with John as his coach and bodyguard on concert tours.

By JeNNy seiFerT

STORy CONTINUES


Sharing deeply compatible interests in the environment and social justice, Tom and John co-founded the Windstar Foundation on 1000 acres of ranch and wilderness in Old Snowmass, Colorado in 1976. By the mid 80’s, they were recognized for teaching and demonstrating bio-intensive gardening, bio-domes, alternative energy prototypes, as well as for conducting educational symposia on social is-sues. Some of the pioneers of the sustainability movement, including Bucky Fuller, Jean Michele Cousteau and Amory Lovins, have served on their board. (Today, Lovins’ Rocky Mountain Institute is located on the Windstar land.)

During this journey, Tom realized that his work had co-alesced into a system of effectively dealing with conflict and stress. An agent of Simon and Schuster discovered his conflict resolution workshops and encouraged him to work on a book that S&S published in 1987. The Magic of Conflict became a best seller, and he found himself back on the road. Three books, including his latest Three Deep Breaths: Finding Power and Purpose in a Stressed Out World, and many years later, Tom is still on the road, learning and sharing.

A recent stop on Tom’s journey was Living Future 2009, Cascadia’s Unconference for Deep Green Professionals, in Portland, OR. As a prelude to his keynote, Tom took some time to explain to Trim Tab his conflict resolution phi-losophy and techniques and how these can be used by sus-tainability movement leaders to effectively enable change.

TriM TAB: What are the basic tenets to your approach to conflict resolution, leadership and stress management?

THOMAs CruM: Conflict is nature’s primary motivator for change. Yet, through a series of misperceptions, such as equating conflict with a win/lose contest, or thinking

that all conflicts are negative, we continuously destroy the opportunity that conflict provides—to strengthen relationships, build greater trust, and to learn about others and ourselves. There is always energy to be gained from conflict and, as I demonstrate on the physical level in the martial art of Aikido, it is blending with and redirecting that energy that produces powerful results. To be a good leader, we must have the ability to be calm and centered in stressful times, so that we can create conscious dialogue and build effective relationships and teams.

TT: What are the physiological and psychological impacts of stress? What is the cost of stress on the economy; on the environment; on our communities?

TC: A 2001 study from the American Institute of Stress showed that nearly half of all workers say they need help in learning how to manage stress, approximately one million workers are absent every day due to stress, and job stress costs U.S. industry over $300 billion annually as a result of accidents, absenteeism, employee turnover, diminished productivity and directly related medical, legal and insurance costs.

Stress is a part of life. Whether it’s “dis-stressful” on our mind, body, or spirit or actually beneficial has a great deal to do with how we respond. Stress is one of the best op-portunities to become wiser, stronger, and more flexible. In this technology-exploding, information-overloading, and relationship-eroding world we are jeopardizing our productivity, our creativity and our vitality needed to make a more conscious and green environment. As we become more capable of transforming our personal stressors into vitality, our ability to create a more sustainable world around us grows significantly. Then, as we become more green and sustainable, we begin to eliminate the sources of so many stressors: pollution, the economic and security issues surrounding an oil-based economy, and unhealthy and unstimulating working environments. The opportunity for a positive, upward spiral is our choice.

TT: How does your technique, Three Deep Breaths, work? Can you summarize it for our readers?

TC: Science has shown us that there are three “C’s” of a stress resistant immune system:

1. A sense of CONTROL over your response to life events;

2. A sense of COMMITMENT to something be-yond your ego (i.e. family, service, religion, or life philosophy);

3. A sense of CHALLENGE and learning opportu-nity when confronted with a stressor.

15trim tab

The Three Deep Breaths technique is a mind-body process that achieves the three C’s by cognitively changing our thoughts, while balancing our autonomic nervous system through the breath:

1. The Centering Breath gives us the calm and bal-ance we need to respond appropriately rather than react negatively in stressful situations.

2. The Possibility Breath reminds us of a purpose higher than our ego.

3. The Discovery Breath turns a stressful situation into a crucial learning opportunity.

TT: How can your techniques be helpful in finding balance in light of the current economic and environmental crisis?

TC: In the first breath of Three Deep Breaths, the centering breath, you become more present and aware. As this happens, you naturally become more connected to your environment; it ceases to be something “other” and starts to become an intrinsic part of you. In the second breath, the possibility breath, you tap into opening your mind at the highest level of purpose, keeping you on the path of appropriate actions (including wise environmental choices). The third breath, the breath of discovery, keeps you fascinated, bringing you creative insights and practical solutions.

Moreover, concepts from the Magic of Conflict approach support us to be more effective at influencing those re-sistant forces that constantly push back when it comes to transforming our world into a more sustainable one. Con-sider the unnecessary, costly, and time-consuming battles between environmentalists and big business or between the green designers and traditional builders. A myth that gets perpetuated throughout history is that conflict is a contest. Most people today are raised consciously or unconsciously with training in competition. Male or female—from card games to business competition—the attitude is in-bred. “Go for the kill” may need to happen on the battlefield, but it doesn’t need to happen in the city council meeting. We must break the pattern of seeing all differences as a win-lose contest.

Add to this dilemma the psychological research that there is an innate human characteristic of “in grouping/loyalty.” Humans have a ferocious tendency for building one army or team against another. This may be good for a football game, but in the case of a green designer approaching a CFO, it is counterproductive to take sides. Instead, the en-ergy is better spent on recognizing common needs and wants and building creative solutions.

As we break some of these old patterns and beliefs, we will also be aware of times when conflicts aren’t really conflicts, but rather mutually interdependent constructs that need to be brought into balance. Consider breathing: which is more important, inhalation or exhalation? Join-ing the battle between one and the other, which “side” would you be on? We can see the lunacy of this “conflict.” Likewise, we need to recognize that the tensions between constructs such as structure vs. flexibility, old school vs. new school, or conservatism vs. liberalism should not lead us to a war over which is right, but to the recognition that both have a place and need to be understood and brought into balance, just like breathing in and out.

TT: What is the “power of centering” and how is it essential to leadership and positive change?

TC: Many people make decisions primarily on the basis of the mind: thoughts, rationale, historical beliefs and prejudices; others on emotions: sensations, gut impulses, intuition, spontaneity. Center is a place that includes both thoughts and emotions, but considers them to be useful input rather than “truths” per se. The most constructive decisions are made from a calmer, more creative space where the mind (thoughts), the body (emotion), and the spirit (one’s orientation to the unknown) are integrated. Center is not some mystical, ambiguous concept. Centering is a psycho-physiological state that is verifiable. In workshops, I teach physical skills that test and develop center, so one develops a biofeedback system to further develop centering on a daily basis. As centering grows within, we are able to make better choices as leaders because we have increased focus, heightened awareness, and a deeper sense of connection. As we all know, great leadership is all about focus, awareness, and the ability to develop powerful relationships.

TT: What are the common obstacles to finding centeredness? How can we overcome them?

TC: Being too busy to notice—noticing that we are not thinking clearly; that we are not focused and calm; that we are not present. Once we take a moment to center and be aware, a curative process begins. When we are aware that we’re not being good listeners, we naturally begin to develop a more receptive state. When we are aware that we are physically off-balance, we naturally make adjustments. With awareness, we learn how not to react to the ups and downs in life; that is, we aren’t run by our emotions and historical prejudices, addicted to the ups and fearful of the downs. A daily practice like centering reshapes our brain, creating more powerful neurological pathways. Centering allows us to respond appropriately, rather than react in a knee-jerk fashion.

TT: What techniques should social movement leaders exhibit in order to be successful change agents?

TC: Techniques of centered communication. When social movement leaders deal with conflicts and resistance, they often become aware that “something needs to change,” but then assign that “something” (usually in the form of blame) to the other party. Or they just “talk around” the issues. To resolve conflicts we need to face what can be a difficult task—we need to be willing to change ourselves: how we communicate, how we act, how acutely and honestly we identify conflict and accept responsibility. Finding real solutions is a co-creation process. Leaders need to be proactive and they need to dialogue with conflicting parties within a context of mutual respect and an honoring of the needs and concerns of all sides. In this way they can be most influential and inspirational.

TT: How can your techniques be applied to the sustainability and green building movement?

TC: We must speak to people’s needs. Are people interested in prosperity in the long run, in terms of both happiness and economics? Of course. Then people need to know that becoming green is getting what they really want. The adage

is trite but true: becoming green makes dollars and sense. The connection of sustainability and green-ability with one’s personal health, joy, and pocketbook must constantly be made if we are going to break people’s resistance to change. In Aikido, I show people how to physically blend with and redirect an attacker’s energy. Now is the time to use the Green Movement to blend with the tumultuous “energy” and needs of the world today and to redirect them to a sustainable future.

TT: What’s your vision for a sustainable world?

TC: For me, sustainability is creating a world in which all of us have the resources to fulfill our highest potential for health, meaning and contribution in a manner that insures that those resources and more will be available for all future generations.

Guy Battle, Director, Battle McCarthy Ltd.Low Energy Buildings and Sustainable Communities: Designing for the Zero Carbon EconomydesigNiNg For THe Zero carboN ecoNoMYWednesday, June 24 – Portland, orthursday, June 25 – seattle, Wa

For more information and to register, click here or visit:http://www.cascadiagbc.org/education/transformational-lecture-series

TRANSFORMATIONAL LECTURE SERIESTHe WOrlD’s MOsT VisiONAry THOuGHT leADers sHAre THeir exPerieNCes

AND WisDOM ON THe TOPiCs THAT uNDerPiN AND MOTiVATe THe GreeN

BuilDiNG iNDusTry. THese leCTures PrOMise TO iNsPire A reVOluTiON!

UPCOMING LECTURE!

sPonsoRed by:

jeNNy SeIFeRT is the Oregon Assistant Director of the Cascadia region Green Building Council and the managing editor of Trim Tab. she has also written for ecometro.com.

Cascadia is hiring!

We’re seeking talented and motivated candidates to fill these positions:

OReGON ASSISTANT DIRecTOR

cHIeF OPeRATING OFFIceR

ADMINISTRATIve ASSISTANT

For the complete job description, please visit the cascadia job board

ThisIsReality.org A blog devoted to revealing the truth about “clean” coal. It’s as real as unicorns.

Watch the Coen Brothers try to sell the illusion of “Clean Coal”

“A Hog in a Tuxedo is Still a Hog: The NAIOP Disinformation Study” Architecture 2030’s Special Bulletin on a misleading study revealing the false (in)feasibility of reducing building energy consumption.

“Aiming for the Stars: A manifesto in the guise of a standard that raises the bar” GreenSource’s recent feature article on the Living Building Challenge.

FW: Read This! SUbJECT:

TO:

CC:

FROM:

Articles, websites and other social media that are also turning the ship

Dear Readers, Trim Tab introduces this new section, which will contain interesting and forward-thinking social media pieces that are also raising awareness and facilitating change. We encourage you to check them out! Simply click on the headings below.


ToxicAssets

COluMN By Bill WAlsH

19trim tab

President Obama has rightfully linked our economic re-covery to our environmental recovery. But we need to break the link between the corporate behavior that drove us to the brink of financial ruin in the first place and that which continues to drive us towards ecological ruin.

Like the economic collapse, our ecological collapse is be-ing fueled by industries creating widespread social risk in their reckless and dangerous pursuit of short-term profits. What’s worse, their modus operandi includes massive pub-lic relations campaigns, philanthropy and lobbying efforts that portray their self-interested behavior as part of the societal solution. Think Clean Coal.

In the green building movement, the leading example of this behavior is the rebranding of virtually every build-ing material as a “green” product, officially recognized by one label or another. The green label craze resembles the virus-like uptake of the financial assets known as collater-alized debt obligations (CDOs), the so-called derivatives that brought down the financial house. CDOs purported to apportion risk, protect conservative investors and as-sure long-term economic stability. But CDOs, like green labels, were really a Trojan horse.

Journalist Matt Taibbi’s recent R-rated description of the CDO rage in Rolling Stone Magazine sounds like a de-scription of green product marketing today: “Suddenly, thanks to this financial seal of approval, banks had a way to turn their shittiest mortgages and other financial waste into investment-grade paper.... The problem was, none of this was based on reality.... To get AAA ratings, the CDOs relied not on their actual underlying assets but on crazy mathematical formulas that the banks cooked up to make the investments look safer than they really were.”1

Relying upon the fraudulent AAA ratings, the most con-servative investors unwittingly fueled the machinery of their own ruin. Relying upon the plethora of greenwash labels and certifications will have a similar ironic outcome – the most committed environmental consumers unwit-

tingly fueling the industrial engines that have driven and continue to drive us towards ecological collapse.

The bad mortgages sold by Citibank and the bad debts bundled into the CDOs by insurance behemoth AIG have been labeled “toxic assets.” Their detoxification depends largely upon the full faith and credit of the US Govern-ment, i.e. the Fed’s ability to create wealth by printing money. But the Fed won’t be able to create species gone extinct and cultures extinguished under the greenwash for-est certification standards authored by the timber industry, or undo the avoidable reproductive problems caused by endocrine-disrupting chemicals in thousands of green-labeled products.

Whole systems of banking, insurance and credit thought “too big to fail” have failed. We are all too aware that big ecological systems – arable land, fresh water, the climate - are under stress. Their collapse has the potential to make this economic crisis look like kids’ stuff. All it takes is an-other Katrina in New Orleans, or another tsunami, this time in L.A., or another Chernobyl, the plume this time spreading across the US bread basket or California’s Cen-tral Valley, or the final disappearance of honey bees. Or maybe it will be some statistically impossible combination of ecological crises, as unlikely to happen as say mortgag-es, insurance and credit failing all at once.

Our major industries – mining, timber, energy, chemicals, plastics – have been reinventing their images, not their in-dustries. Ubiquitous green labels and advertising are part of the problem, not the solution. If it seems too easy be-ing green these days, remember how easy it was to refi-nance your mortgage two years ago.

This article was originally published on May 6, 2009 in Health Building News. bILL wALSH is the executive Director of the Healthy Building Network.

eNDNOTes

[1] Taibbi, Matt “The Big Takeover.” Rolling Stone, Issue 1075. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/26793903/the_big_takeover

ToxicAssets


Many people believe leadership is a function of position, charismatic personality, or notoriety. In looking at leader-ship this way, the field is narrowed even further, because a lot of leaders with those characteristics are not real leaders at all. They put on their masks and play the game, but their ineffectiveness or self-serving agendas tell the real story. From this perspective, leadership is a scarce resource, one that makes us feel fortunate if we ever get to work with one of the few good ones.

Another view of leadership is that you already have every-thing you need to be a great leader in the arena that you work in. Real leadership is a matter of having the heart to make your full contribution—today, tomorrow, and the next day. From this perspective, we have thousands of leaders carry-ing the responsibility for environmental transformation in the building industry. These leaders have no authority to change societal consciousness, but they have a passion for preserving our planet’s beauty and natural resources. These leaders have a variety of personalities that range from quiet, ornery hardheads, to articulate, open minded teddy bears; but they all have the ability to connect with people about what truly matters. These leaders largely work without fan-fare or recognition; the people who benefit from their lead-ership, however, know who they are.

To succeed with our transformational cause, transforma-tion is required at the level of the individual. Individuals who never thought of themselves as leaders need to stick their necks out. They need to express the passion in their hearts in ways that move people to take new actions. And you — the current green building practitioners — have done this. You have already made an impact to our indus-try and built some significant momentum. However, we need to accelerate our progress and expand our leadership exponentially. To do this, we need to move people to ac-tion even more effectively.

cHANNeLING THe PASSION

Let’s look at this more closely. You have a passion for con-tribution that is your highest authority. Passion is all we

really have to stand on. To use our passion most effectively, we must appeal to people’s emotions and concerns with optimism and a sense of possibility. It is not enough to present the data that climate change is an inevitable danger. We need to have the tough conversations that address the underlying fear and hopelessness that prevents some people from engaging in the idea that business as usual is no longer viable. Our passion for these tough conversations needs to be measured with sensitivity. If we show up as newly con-verted zealots on a mission to impose our passion on oth-ers, we are doing everyone a disservice. We need to set aside our judgments of those who have not yet seen the light. We need to reach out to those who are still doubtful, as friends not foes. We need to trust that everyone has a heart that values and longs to take the high road.

To have these conversations effectively, we need to engage people where they are with respect and understanding; that is, they must be engaged with heart. Acceptance and inclusion are two key ingredients in the art of influence. We need to listen carefully to what people care about. We need to understand what inhibits their passion for both societal and personal change. In doing so, we can weave our own perspective into what matters to the person we are speaking with. Done respectfully, this dialogue begins to create trust in our leadership as a service to their highest intentions. The outcome of this type of true engagement at the heart level is that both people learn something and both people grow. They each go forward more prepared to do their own part to change the world.

THe TIMe IS NOw!

There is no need to wait for the perfect time or the right audience. The people we are meant to influence are al-ready in our lives. Right now you are perfectly prepared to passionately engage the people you are working with to see things in a new way—to create a new understanding of business as usual.

However we often don’t see it that way and we miss our opportunities. We spend our time performing the func-tions we’ve been trained in and were hired for. We work diligently to meet deadlines, satisfy customers, and keep a roof over our head. These functions are necessary and they can bring us a sense of satisfaction. But if we want to embrace our own leadership, somewhere deep inside we know this is not our real work.

As leaders, we see that things need to change in a big way, but sometimes when it comes to addressing changes with the people in our immediate environment, we get a bit in-timidated. It’s tough asking a colleague, client, or subcon-

leADersHiP: sCArCe resOurCe Or VAsT reserVOir?By PAul WerDer

21trim tab

tractor to consider a higher standard, or to challenge the level of “good enough” in people you’ve worked with for years. You are taking on a big risk when you ask people to risk what they are comfortable with. So, how do you step into leadership if this risk is foreign territory?

You begin with one person who respects you, one uncom-fortable conversation, and one risk that you are willing to take. The truth about leadership is that the person who raises their hand and effectively proposes a better future is called a leader. Will you fail? Yes, sometimes you will. Will you be uncomfortable? Yes, sometimes you will be very uncomfortable. And will you make a difference? Yes, not always, but more often than you think. You will learn to express your passion with sensitivity and to connect with people in a more meaningful manner. Ultimately, you will learn that the people you were reluctant to approach with more intimate, risky conversations will recognize you for the courage you brought to them.

As this form of personal transformation expands expo-nentially, we will look back and realize expressing leader-ship wasn’t as hard as we first imagined. We will realize that we were the ones we were waiting for. This will allow us to make our complete contribution to the world. That’s all that’s ever been expected of the great leaders in history: to give everything they have to what matters. Are you will-ing to be a great leader in your own realm? If so, there’s a vast reservoir of leadership that just got a little deeper.

PAUL weRDeR is the CeO and founder of lionHeart Consulting inc. www.lionhrt.com

THE GREEN WASH


ReSPONSIbLe INDUSTRy Alexander von Bismarck and Andrea Johnson from the environmental investigation Agency (eiA)

bUILDING cORPORATe ReSPONSIbILITy with Adrian Henriques, author of “Corporate Truth:the limits to Transparency”

bIOPHILIA with Tim Beatley, Judith Heerwagen, and Bert Gregory

eNeRGy sessions with Mark Frankel, Technical Director of New Buildings institute.

Anyplace. Anytime. Ecologicate your mind.

living Building leader cultivates thought and action influentials around the world.

A series of online sessions, the program provides the building industry a means to develop the diverse and intensive skill set needed to effect transformative change.

www.livingbuildingleader.org

Check the website regularly for other offerings & the 2009 lineup.

Sessions available now!

The ilBi is a non-governmental organization dedicated to the creation of a truly sustainable built environment in all countries around the world. Comprised of the leading green building experts, futurists and thought-leaders, we believe that providing a compelling vision for the future is a fundamental requirement of reconciling humanity’s relationship with the natural world.

FOr MOre iNFOrMATiON ABOuT THe iNsTiTuTe AND

TO ACCess THe NeW ON-liNe HOMe FOr liViNG

BuilDiNG CHAlleNGe, VisiT: www.ilbi.org

23trim tab

The building industry has expressed incredible enthusiasm and excitement toward The Living Building Challenge™ since it was first introduced at Greenbuild in 2006. Few green-minded professionals question the value or integrity of creating structures whose performance reaches net zero energy and water targets. But the initial reaction by many is expected: “Isn’t it going to cost significantly more?”

To help quantify the costs and paybacks associated with designing and constructing Living Buildings, Cascadia partnered with SERA Architects, Skanska USA Building, Gerding/Edlen Development, New Buildings Institute and Interface Engineering (all national leaders in green building) on a comprehensive study of first-cost premiums and long-term paybacks. The team analyzed what it would cost to convert nine existing LEED Gold buildings to Living Buildings, exploring a variety of structures in different climates.

The nine building types studied included:Single family residence 1. University classroom building2. K-8 school structure3. Mixed-use renovation4. Low-rise office building5. Mid-rise office building6. High-rise mixed-use skyscraper 7. Multifamily residential structure8. Hospital9.

The four sample climates examined included:Portland, OR (temperate)1. Atlanta, GA (hot/humid)2. Phoenix, AZ (hot/arid)3. Boston, MA (cool)4.

The study’s findings are remarkable, in that cost premiums for Living Buildings are considerably smaller than first expected. In many cases, they are within easy striking distance for many building types with very reasonable paybacks. The results clearly show that building type, location, size and the availability of incentives intermix to provide a wide range of economic implications. In Portland for example, the higher-ed facility would see no more than a 4-9 percent premium – well within reach for this building type. As a result, these numbers suggest that a more aggressive timeline to net zero energy and water for all university facilities should be pushed immediately. Other building types show premiums only in the 15-20 percent range, also showing that by slightly downsizing a project or raising slightly more capital, that this high level of performance could be built immediately.

Even the most expensive option (hospital facilities that see no more than a 50 percent cost increase), while perhaps currently too large, are a far cry from the “doubling of cost” that many would predict.

As the market continues to change, it is expected that these premiums will continue to drop further, potentially ushering a new era of truly sustainable architecture sooner than expected.

A detailed cost comparison matrix can be found on the following pages; this and a full summary of the study are available at www.ilbi.org or simply click here.

THe BOTTOM liNe ON liViNG BuilDiNGs

Cascadia Study Shows Economic Benefits of Self-Sustaining Structures

By THe TriM TAB eDiTOriAl TeAM

Robert bateman Centre at Royal Roads University in Victoria, bC. Rendering courtesy of Iredale Group Architecture.


PORTLAND

MIXED USE RENOVATION MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL HIGH RISE MIXED USESINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOSPITAL

BOSTON

ATLANTA

PHOENIX

C O S T C O M P A R I S O N M A T R I XLIVING BUILDING FINANCIAL STUDY 1155-2200%

36.8

Total array size in kilo watts

Total water use in kilo gallons

Resultant Energy Use Intensity in kbtu/sf/year

Cost premium (%)

rainwatergreywaterblackwater

$146/sf

273 kw

357k

Direct Construction Cost

Payback period 15-20 years

Site plan

indicating PV, site and massing changes

Section indicating form changes

$247/sf $263/sf$282/sf $194/sf $234/sf $148/sf $215/sf $411/sf$337/sf

$304/sf $207/sf $222/sf$239/sf $168/sf $210/sf $129/sf $188/sf $363/sf



temperate

hot humid

hot arid

cool

UNIVERSIT Y CLASSROOM

12-17111222222222222222222 1711111 %

16-211166 211111 %

16-211111111111111166666666666666 21111111 %

$337/s/ f

649 kw

301k

743 kw

301k

12 17111111111111112222222222222-117%%

SCHOOL K-8

11-161111111 16%

19-241111111111111111199999999999999-244441 %

17-221111111111111111111777777777777777777-221 %%

$247/sf/

1013 kw

968k

776 kw

968k

MID RISE OFFICE

26-3126 31%

32-3732 3333333333333373 %

36-4136 444444444441%

773 kw

/

851 kw

357k

357k

LOW RISE OFFICE

29-3429-344%

33-3933333-39%%

355-4400000000000000000000%

271 kw

/

273 kw

122k

122k

17-22117-2211 %

/

1433 kw

357k

20-25200 2 % 26-312 % 16-2116 21% 21-26222 %

23-2823-28222 %%

26 312226-311222 %%

1143 kw

376k

35-403555 4 %

39-4439-4 %

38-4338 43%

7 kw

31k

31-36%

33-383 %

32-37%

654 kw

357k

20-2520 222222222222222222222222222555555555555555%

20-2520 22222222255555555522 %

23-2823 22222222222222222222222288888888888888888888888822 %

2556 kw

32-3732 33333333337777777777777777777733333 %

32-37333 %

32-37333 %

4465 kw

/

825 kw

959k1296k267k

1180k

556 kw25

633k2525k1685k

4288k

/

3143 kw

/

4959 kw143 kw31

425k2525k1866k 4288k

59 kw495

1921k2368k

65 kw446

2688k4288k1601k

981 kw

176k72k53k

569kw

523k445k

591 kw

153k195k

205 kw

95k 27k

2222222222222222111111111111-22662 %

855 kw

182k119k

4 kw

17k14k

513 kw

227k1296k

1976 kw 3439 kw

75k 999k

19976 kw19

321k2525k1997k

3439 kkw439 k

386k4288k3903k

24-2924 292 %

130k

1617 kw

301k

1224 kw

968k

930 kw

357k

330 kw

122k

1578 kw

376k

9 kw

26k

912 kw

1096k

3582 kw 5666 kw

k

91

101296k

35882 kw358

517k2525k1801k

56666 kw56

2196k4288k2093k5k

/

6 kw

23k9k

44 49444-499944 %

8885

1119k

4-9444444444444 999%

35.4 28.2 36.030.3 37.2 15.5 23.2 32.0 123.9

40.3 24.8 34.935.5 35.3 17.1 21.8 30.6 117.4

38.4 23.0 34.234.3 33.6 11.5 22.0 30.9 118.7

48.6 35.7 43.443.6 45.5 19.5 28.5 40.5 148.0

kbtu/sf/yearkbtu/sf/yearkbtu/sf/yearkbtu/sf/year kbtu/sf/year kbtu/sf/year kbtu/sf/year kbtu/sf/year kbtu/sf/year




11-16 years 27-32 years 22-27 years 13-18 years

12-17 years

9-14 years

6-11 years

29-34 years

39-44 years

22-27 years

20-25 years

19-24 years

12-17 years

13-18 years

11-16 years

8-13 years

11-16 years

6-11 years

9-14 years 2-7 years

8-13 years

10-15 years

6-11 years

10-15 years

8-13 years

12-17 years

6-11 years

18-23 years

15-20 years

16-21 years

10-15 years

25-30 years

21-26 years

20-25 years

16-21 years

10-15 years

25trim tab

PORTLAND

MIXED USE RENOVATION MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL HIGH RISE MIXED USESINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOSPITAL

BOSTON

ATLANTA

PHOENIX

C O S T C O M P A R I S O N M A T R I XLIVING BUILDING FINANCIAL STUDY 1155-2200%

36.8

Total array size in kilo watts

Total water use in kilo gallons

Resultant Energy Use Intensity in kbtu/sf/year

Cost premium (%)

rainwatergreywaterblackwater

$146/sf

273 kw

357k

Direct Construction Cost

Payback period 15-20 years

Site plan

indicating PV, site and massing changes

Section indicating form changes

$247/sf $263/sf$282/sf $194/sf $234/sf $148/sf $215/sf $411/sf$337/sf




temperate

hot humid

hot arid

cool

UNIVERSIT Y CLASSROOM

12-17111222222222222222222 1711111 %

16-211166 211111 %

16-211111111111111166666666666666 21111111 %

$337/s/ f

649 kw

301k

743 kw

301k

12 17111111111111112222222222222-117%%

SCHOOL K-8

11-161111111 16%

19-241111111111111111199999999999999-244441 %

17-221111111111111111111777777777777777777-221 %%

$247/sf/

1013 kw

968k

776 kw

968k

MID RISE OFFICE

26-3126 31%

32-3732 3333333333333373 %

36-4136 444444444441%

773 kw

/

851 kw

357k

357k

LOW RISE OFFICE

29-3429-344%

33-3933333-39%%

355-4400000000000000000000%

271 kw

/

273 kw

122k

122k

17-22117-2211 %

/

1433 kw

357k

20-25200 2 % 26-312 % 16-2116 21% 21-26222 %

23-2823-28222 %%

26 312226-311222 %%

1143 kw

376k

35-403555 4 %

39-4439-4 %

38-4338 43%

7 kw

31k

31-36%

33-383 %

32-37%

654 kw

357k

20-2520 222222222222222222222222222555555555555555%

20-2520 22222222255555555522 %

23-2823 22222222222222222222222288888888888888888888888822 %

2556 kw

32-3732 33333333337777777777777777777733333 %

32-37333 %

32-37333 %

4465 kw

/

825 kw

959k1296k267k

1180k

556 kw25

633k2525k1685k

4288k

/

3143 kw

/

4959 kw143 kw31

425k2525k1866k 4288k

59 kw495

1921k2368k

65 kw446

2688k4288k1601k

981 kw

176k72k53k

569kw

523k445k

591 kw

153k195k

205 kw

95k 27k

2222222222222222111111111111-22662 %

855 kw

182k119k

4 kw

17k14k

513 kw

227k1296k

1976 kw 3439 kw

75k 999k

19976 kw19

321k2525k1997k

3439 kkw439 k

386k4288k3903k

24-2924 292 %

130k

1617 kw

301k

1224 kw

968k

930 kw

357k

330 kw

122k

1578 kw

376k

9 kw

26k

912 kw

1096k

3582 kw 5666 kw

k

91

101296k

35882 kw358

517k2525k1801k

56666 kw56

2196k4288k2093k5k

/

6 kw

23k9k

44 49444-499944 %

8885

1119k

4-9444444444444 999%

35.4 28.2 36.030.3 37.2 15.5 23.2 32.0 123.9

40.3 24.8 34.935.5 35.3 17.1 21.8 30.6 117.4

38.4 23.0 34.234.3 33.6 11.5 22.0 30.9 118.7

48.6 35.7 43.443.6 45.5 19.5 28.5 40.5 148.0





11-16 years 27-32 years 22-27 years 13-18 years

12-17 years

9-14 years

6-11 years

29-34 years

39-44 years

22-27 years

20-25 years

19-24 years

12-17 years

13-18 years

11-16 years

8-13 years

11-16 years

6-11 years

9-14 years 2-7 years

8-13 years

10-15 years

6-11 years

10-15 years

8-13 years

12-17 years

6-11 years

18-23 years

15-20 years

16-21 years

10-15 years

25-30 years

21-26 years

20-25 years

16-21 years

10-15 years


STORy by JASON F. MCLENNAN

Density and Sustainability – A Radical Perspective

CHAlleNGiNG THe WisDOM OF exAGGerATeD HeiGHT AND DeNsiTy iN urBAN sTruCTures

27trim tab

We have all seen the futuristic, sci-fi depictions of what our cities of tomorrow are supposedly going to look like. These Blade Runner-esque wastelands are as depressing as they are ridiculous and they are certainly not the kinds of places where we want our children and grandchildren to live. They present a foregone conclusion that our cities will end up as megalopolises filled with skyscrapers that stretch for miles – taking New York, Tokyo, Singapore and Hong Kong to an absurd level of density and height. Unfortunately, many in the green building community seem captivated by so-called Eco-high-rises and green skyscrapers and assume that the sky-high buildings portrayed in books and movies are not only coming, but are best for us from a sustainability standpoint. There is a belief that more density and height is always better.”

I disagree.

As global populations rise and resources diminish, I propose an alternative way of thinking about the greening of our city structures. I believe that there is, like so many things in life, a “sweet-spot” between density and height as well as culture and the environment. Contrary to popular thinking, I believe that there is a point at which the sustainability benefits of density and building height diminish – then actually reverse!

cities of the future The cities of the future should be more than ecologically benign; they must also be socially just and culturally rich. As today’s designers, urban planners, politicians

and architects, we have a responsibility to seek urban form that achieves the highest possible level of cultural, social, aesthetic and environmental goals. Solutions that achieve one or two at the expense of the others are, in the long-term, failures. Such is the story of most of today’s cities. Unfortunately, the same can be said for the current planning and visions of the city of the future that revolve around excessive height and density.

Putting density in its vertical PlaceWe’ve known for some time that the lower the urban density, the greater the environmental burdens and the more dramatic the societal impact. There are countless scholarly articles about the ills of suburban sprawl and low-density development. Since the 1990s, the negative reality of how we transformed our cities from World War II onward has finally sunk in. When people are spread out, public transportation systems lose their effectiveness, private vehicle use rises, pollution increases and the citizens’ interconnectedness and cultural connections suffer. We have paved over farmland and forestland for strip malls and lollypop subdivisions. I have no debate with these realizations. The suburban model is broken and destructive. When presented against our litmus test of ecologically benign, socially just and culturally rich communities, they fail miserably.

I do take issue, however, with the disparagement of all low-density communities, including small rural towns that traditionally had a purpose as the breadbasket of our nation. As bedroom communities, they are disastrous,

CiTies OF THe FuTure sHOulD Be eCOlOGiCAlly BeNiGN, sOCiAlly JusT AND CulTurAlly riCH


but as centers of rich agricultural life, they are essential. There is nothing wrong with living on an acre or more if you are raising chickens and growing a large percentage of your vegetables!

With that said, let’s leave the well-worn path of low density out of this discussion and focus on a current sacred cow: the assumption that density and building height is always good and the more there is of it, the better. The question we should ask ourselves is simple.

I believe the answer might surprise a few people.

the nature of limits and finding the sweet spotIn the natural world, it is commonly understood that there are limits to the density of any one species on a given area of land. These limits are never hard and fast rules, but are based on the carrying capacity of the land that varies through time and location. Too many of any one animal in any one place results in less than ideal conditions for the whole. There are limits, but we believe our cleverness removes these rules on our behalf. We build how we like because we think we can and the results of this attitude are becoming painfully clear.

So, let’s skip right to the punch line.

I believe that there should be limits to the density of our cities and to the heights of the buildings in which the majority of humanity lives. I believe that there is a “sweet spot” or optimal range that results in the kind of urbanity that best meets our test and should guide our long-term vision of the cities of tomorrow. I believe that this sweet spot tends to be in the four-to-eight-story height range at densities between 30 and 100 dwelling units/acre for reasons that I’ll outline shortly. Depending on circumstances, this range could be extended downward to two-to-three stories and upwards to twelve-to-fourteen (with corresponding adjustments to density). But the sweet spot is between four and eight.

The remainder of this article presents a series of arguments that explain my rationale. Each argument alone is not enough, but I believe that in concert they make a compelling case for my theory. As you will see, a built environment within the “sweet spot” of height (assuming an urban fabric and most decidedly not isolated buildings in the landscape) results in the best mix of energy efficiency while retaining a fundamental human-to-nature connection.

Within my proposed range, the best results are achieved: enough density to allow for car-free living in a city that is resilient and walkable, while keeping us close enough to the ground to maintain our relationship with the Earth and with one another. In this regard, density may be looked at from a spatial as well as a vertical perspective.

Making the caseCapping the height and density of our communities will yield advantages on global, societal and personal levels. When the following individual arguments are considered together, they demonstrate the overwhelming strength of the idea. This combination of factors can usher in a better quality of life for and in our cities.

1 Story: Not productive2-3 Stories: Good, but not ideal4-8 Stories: Ideal8-12 Stories: Good, but not ideal12-14 Stories: Pushing it14+ Stories: Increasing Impact

What building heights and urban densities result in the maximum benefits to culture, society and the environment?

THe sWeeT sPOT

29trim tab

on a fully built-out urban site depending upon climate and building type. Building anything taller would require more surface area than exists to generate enough energy or capture enough water with the resources available. That height/density range can be extended based on a more district/neighborhood level approach. If we believe in a future of carbon-neutral cities with decentralized neighborhood and building scale systems, then our sweet spot is activated.

ARguMent two – density And tRAnsPoRtAtion effectivenessIn an ideal and truly sustainable city, people should be able to walk or bike for any of their daily needs, and the city’s density would support renewably-powered public transportation systems to take people further afield when necessary. A truly walkable, pedestrian-oriented community is the most democratic and socially just, allowing people of all ages access to the services they require, whether they can drive or not. At the densities suggested in our “sweet-spot,” this idea is reached perfectly without the need for super-scaled, mass-people-moving systems that end up using even more energy.

ARguMent thRee – secuRity And PAssive suRvivAbilityIn this discussion, it is important to consider the concept

Cities like barcelona and Amsterdam reach the right density to make car-free travel possible at a scale that is humane and connected to place.

ARguMent one – living buildings; eneRgy And wAteR indePendenceThe Living Building Challenge™ focuses on buildings that are energy- and water-independent. For single structure projects pursuing the Challenge, the program requires your building to generate all of its own energy on-site with renewable resources on a net annual basis, and to capture all water for use in the building through rainwater catchment, then treat it onsite for reuse. This is a radical departure from resource wasteful regional systems. That said, we recognize in the Living Building Challenge that the ideal scale for energy generation or water treatment and capture may not always be at the building level. The program has a system called “Scale Jumping” that allows for neighborhood/district scale systems as well. At this scale, buildings can share “resources” in a similar way that a forest shares resources without sizeable system losses and obscene levels of infrastructure. A decentralized system for energy and water is, in the long term, more economic, safer from a national security standpoint, and allows for more innovation due to the scale of solutions available.

This is interesting: when you look technically at what it takes to produce net-zero energy and water buildings based on available solar energy, wind or rainfall, you end up with a maximum range between two and six stories in height


of passive survivability: how a building’s inhabitants will fare when its power, heating and water systems fail. As the climate continues to change and weather patterns become less predictable, the possibility of system disruptions increase. Additionally, as we transition from a fossil fuel economy, supplies will inevitably decrease and potentially make our communities more vulnerable to disruptions. The taller the building, the more difficult it is to service its energy and water needs and the greater the reliance on globally-sourced materials to build and maintain them. Further, in the event of a catastrophe that cripples a structure’s system, the chance of escape diminishes with every vertical story that occupants must descend. At extreme heights, our cities and buildings become less resilient. What happens to be the maximum height that works without elevators? Six to eight stories…

ARguMent fouR – wAy-finding And defining PlAceKevin Lynch’s great book, The Image of the City, describes how people know how to get around in their city or any city they are visiting by locating paths, edges, nodes or other wayfinding devices and comparing the locations of these markers to where they need to head. Our concept of a place is incredibly wrapped up in our “markers,”

which also say a lot about what we value as a society. The rise of corporate towers and expensive high-rise condos is telling, but perhaps diminishes our sense of place and the “specialness” of our communities.

When all city structures reach to the sky and hide important visual markers, it becomes difficult for us to find our way and we lose any sense of architectural or sociological hierarchy. We should reserve extreme height for structures with societal importance, and leave a visual path that winds through our cities. It is noteworthy that maps of many modern American cities highlight corporate headquarters as the most prominent downtown buildings. We must be able to navigate our way through landscapes containing both natural and man-made vistas.

ARguMent five – 3,000 yeARs of cultuRAl legAcyI’ll keep this point simple. Perhaps several thousand years of continuous civilization means we got some things right? The most sought-after places to visit — the cities we view as cultural legacies of humanity — always fall within our sweet spot of height and density. Paris, Barcelona, Rome and Kyoto are just a few that come to mind. Enough said?

31trim tab

The extreme height and density of parts of Manhattan are exciting and intense, but i believe what makes New york work is its green heart – Central Park – is like a giant biophilic pressure release valve.

ARguMent six – the need foR nAtuRe in the city: bioPhiliABiologist and researcher Edward O. Wilson popularized the notion of biophilia, which he described as “the connections that human beings subconsciously seek with the rest of life.” We thrive emotionally and physically, Wilson wrote, when we are in the presence of other organic forms. Even in our built environment, it is important that we retain this connection. (It is no accident that people put flowerpots on their high-rise balconies, indoor Ficus trees in their offices and electric tabletop fountains on their desks.) When density is disproportionate to nature and we are disconnected from our earthly surroundings, we face the very real risk of what writer Richard Louv has identified as “nature deficit disorder.” In this discussion, the question of New York always comes up. The extreme height and density of parts of Manhattan are exciting and intense, but I believe what makes New York work is that its green heart – Central Park – is like a giant biophilic pressure release valve. If Central Park were paved over with equally tall buildings as in mid-town Manhattan, I believe the city would fail.


ARguMent seven – too high to see fAces: evolutionARy suPPoRt foR liMited heightThere is an important architectural concept known as “Prospect and Refuge.” It is based on the idea that people derive psychological comfort from shelter that affords us a good view of the surroundings – enough to see threats coming, yet never too high to be disconnected from the landscape in order to make our escape. This makes sense if you consider our evolutionary history on the savannah, where prospect was afforded from a knoll or from a tree, such as the acacia that grows to no higher than 100 feet. (People would climb 40-60 feet at the most; there’s our sweet spot again.) One still sees this behavior in our closest evolutionary cousins: great apes.

There was no need to go higher; mid-rise elevations offered long-range visibility while retaining visual clarity of what lay beneath. What is interesting about this degree of prospect is how it relates to our physiological abilities.

The ability to recognize human features diminishes as we move away from a person’s face. Studies show that at 10 feet away, we can no longer see individual eyelashes. At 200 feet, we cannot distinguish the person’s eyes and have a difficult

time distinguishing one person from another. At 500 feet, we can make out a head but it appears blurry. So as we move out of our sweet spot above the ground, we are unable to visually process our fellow humans who stroll along the sidewalk below. This is okay from time to time, but how does this really affect us if this is our daily experience? Even more dramatically, what if this is our everyday experience during our formative years? What happens to our connection to life when people and all of the natural world are rarely more than a mere blur? This, I believe, creates a dangerous disconnection within the species.

equitability. As we move toward a renewable world, it is imperative that we grant all people equal access to sunlight. It would be a tragedy if a building were to invest significant resources to install integrated photovoltaic’s, only to have another taller building put it in shadow and render it obsolete. Like access to fresh air, access to your own sunlight on your property should be a right. It is possible to plan for “solar envelopes” that guide city development and ensure that each property always has access to the light and free energy that it needs. But doing so means restricting building heights to within the “sweet spot” based on rational street widths.

33trim tab

thinking AheadThe greatest human societies — European, early North American, North African and Asian — built their cities in a height range that fits within the proposed ”sweet spot” for culturally rich, ecologically sound and socially just communities (although none of these is guaranteed by urban fabric, only enabled by it). They did this based on the reality of “limits” that did not burden them but allowed them to express culture and place for great local differences. The greatest of those still stand today as testaments to enduring cultural and societal legacies that stretch back for generations.

It’s really only been in the last century when we have felt the need to rise to such architectural heights. Undeniably, there are skyscraping marvels standing in the world’s most impressive cities, but I look at them as exceptions to what should become a new urban rule. If livability is the goal and sustainability is the necessity, then we must start planning now for our cities to return from the clouds to grounded carbon-neutral communities. Perhaps, like our oil-addicted culture, the skyscraper was a brief interlude in human history — a 100-year experiment in density and height that was impressive but never meant to last.

FAR LEFT: Could it be that children growing up so disconnected from the landscape and the proper “scale” of its surroundings, as those in the upper stories of this apartment building, are in some way developmentally disadvantaged? LEFT: Skyscrapers are out of proportion to the street widths below, making for dark, gloomy urban canyons. The only way to get any sun is to keep building higher and to hope your neighbor doesn’t steal your light down the road. bELOW: The Acacia tree, an important part of our evolutionary legacy, shares its scale with our “sweet-spot.”

Perhaps, like our oil-addicted culture, the skyscraper was a brief interlude in human history — a 100-year experiment in density and height that was impressive but never meant to last.


jASON F. McLeNNAN is the CeO of the Cascadia region Green Building Council. He is the creator of the living Building Challenge, as well as the author of three books, including The Philosophy of sustainable Design.

eNDNOTes

[1] Ken Yeang’s Green Skyscraper is an excellent example. [2] Two of my favorites include the Geography of Nowhere by James Kunstler and Ashphalt Nation by Jane Holtz Kay.[3] A great sociological study of this can be found in Robert Putnam’s seminal book Bowling Alone.[4] Again, it is critical that this is not seen as a hard and fast rule, but a range that can be expanded based upon the carrying capacity and particulars of a given place.[5] Along with 14 other simple but profound prerequisites in the Challenge. For more info see www.cascadiagbc.org/lbc

Solar Envelope Diagrams like this show how maximum building height and massing for a given latitude, grid orientation and street width to ensure that one building never negatively impacts another’s access to sun.

To be clear, I’m not talking about creating whole new cities from the ground up. Instead, I propose that we should gradually transform our existing communities. Cities, like living organisms, evolve over time. With careful and thoughtful planning, the urban areas of today can transition to the more environmentally sound cities that we envision for our future. Only a fraction of the buildings that currently stand in a city will remain in place 100 years from now. We are quick to forget how completely we transformed every major metropolitan area in North America to make room for the automobile from 1945-1975. Surely, with the urgent need to address climate change and other global environmental and energy problems, we can do the same again.

In America, our efforts will result in greater overall density for almost every city and produce compact, walkable, pedestrian-oriented communities. But it must be done

within a density that allows urbanity without crowding out our connection to the natural world and diminishing our connections to each other and the scale of place.

As outdated structures are torn down, or as better infill development occurs, we must replace them with alternatives that adhere to saner height and density guidelines. This will more likely result in ideal ecological, cultural and sociological performance. If we succeed, our future cities will be built to last, supporting us as well as they support themselves. And there is no sweeter spot than that.

[6] Just think of mega projects like the Three Gorges Dam, or nuclear reactors that supply huge amounts of energy.[7] It also lends itself to greater social equity, as large mega-projects tend to concentrate wealth whereas decentralized infrastructure keeps wealth distributed among more individuals.[8] Known as place legibility[9] Is that approaching person from our tribe or another tribe?[10] http://uwnews.washington.edu/ni/article.asp?articleID=8228[11] And only in the past century have we had the technological ability to do so with modern steel, the elevator, modern plumbing and air conditioning to enable the jump in height.

35trim tab

CASCADIA ANNOUNCES CREATION OF ThE INTERNATIONAL LIVING bUILDING INSTITUTE (ILbI)

Three years down the road from the launch of the Living Building Challenge™, a non-profit organization devoted to the global development of the standard has been created—the International Living Building Institute (ILBI). Its creation is a response to the increased demand for and interest in the Challenge and will help to disseminate its message and tools on a global scale. Announced at Living Future 2009, ILBI will become its own entity in 2010; in the meantime, Cascadia will manage the Institute. LEARN MORE

UPDATE: CODE IS CRACKED ON bARRIERS TO ThE LIVING bUILDING ChALLENGE

In partnership with the City of Vancouver, WA and Clark County, WA, Cascadia released a study in April that identifies and addresses code and regulatory barriers to the Living Building Challenge for sustainable, affordable, residential development. The Code Study identified 6 green residential projects built or under development in the region that were assessed against Cascadia’s Living Building Challenge criteria. A detailed review of the case study projects against the city and county’s land use, development, and building codes was performed to highlight the potential obstacles projects may encounter. This project is funded through the Washington State Department of Community Trade & Economic Development. MORE INFO

FIRST LIVING bUILDING CANDIDATES STEP UP TO bAT

ThE OMEGA CENTER FOR SUSTAINAbLE LIVING in Rheinbeck, NY and TySON LIVING LEARNING CENTER in Eureka, MO will be the first Living Building Challenge hopefuls to complete construction (May 2009). They will then enter the year-long period of occupancy and opera-tion, after which they must prove they’ve met the require-ments of each petal.

AIA/COTE PICKS ITS 2009 TOP TEN GREEN PROJECTS

The American Institute of Architects (AIA) has named the year’s top ten examples of sustainable architecture and green design, selected by the AIA’s Committee on the Environment (COTE). Many of the new buildings have achieved LEED Platinum certification. The top buildings cover a range of uses, including a student center, a synagogue, apartment buildings, and large commercial buildings, and hail from six U.S. states—California, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Texas, and Washington—as well as Victoria, British Columbia and Beirut, Lebanon. LEARN AbOUT ThE PROJECTS

RECyCLING CENTER TO bECOME FIRST LEED INDUSTRIAL bUILDING IN ALASKA

Funding was recently secured for a community recycling center in Alaska’s Mat-su Borough, which will be built to achieve LEED-Gold, making it the first commercial/

Moving upstream: PrOGress iN THe BiOreGiON AND BeyOND


Vancouver city council unanimously voted in favor to change city bylaws to legalize keeping chickens in urban backyards. The city joins its bioregional neighbors Port-land and Seattle as chicken-friendly zones.

UPDATE: EFFICIENCy FIRST! LEGISLATION bECOMES LAW IN WAShINGTON

In March, the Washington State Legislature approved the Efficiency First! bill and Gov. Chris Gregoire signed it into law. The bill will help spur Washington’s economy and make it a clean energy leader by promoting super-efficient, low-energy-use building codes, requiring disclosure of buildings’ energy use scores to prospective buyers, and make public buildings models of energy efficiency. MORE INFO

OREGON WANDERS DOWN ThE PATh TO NET ZERO

Energy Trust of Oregon, Inc., a non-profit dedicated to promoting energy efficiency and clean renewable energy in Oregon, launched a “Path to Net Zero” pilot for owners who construct non-residential buildings with exceptional energy performance and strive for net zero on-site energy use. Eligible new construction and major renovation projects will receive enhanced design and technical assistance, as well as premium cash incentives. MORE INFO

GREyWATER GETS ThE GREEN ThUMbS UP IN OREGON

Commercial and residential buildings in Oregon are now allowed to use rainwater and greywater, putting the state in the top national tier of progressive water regulations. The report Achieving Water Independence in Buildings, initiated by affordable housing non-profit Central City Concern and supported by a host of green building heavy-hitters, including Cascadia, greatly influenced both the Oregon House of Representatives and Senate to give the thumbs up to House Bill 2080. The bill establishes a definition for greywater, encourages the appropriate reuse of greywater, and instructs the State DEQ to establish a permit for greywater use and disposal outside of buildings. The bill now awaits signing by Governor Kulongoski to become law. MORE INFO

industrial building in the great North to reach such standards, if achieved. The initial design goal is to eventually enable the building to transition to a net-zero energy, zero waste facility, though more financial resources will be required to accomplish this. Construction will begin summer 2009. LEARN MORE AbOUT ThE PROJECT.

VANCOUVER AIMS hIGh, ShOOTS FOR ThE “GREENEST CITy IN ThE WORLD”

Vancouver’s eye is on the prize: to be the Greenest City on Earth by 2020, announced by Mayor Gregor Robertson in April. The recent release of “Urgent Quick Start Recommendations” by the city’s GREENEST CITy ACTION TEAM (GCAT) proposed measures such as creating a priority permitting process for green buildings, making streets safer for pedestrians and cyclists, and creating an edible landscaping policy. READ GCAT’S COMPLETE REPORT

NEW TOOLS FOR PASSIVE DESIGN TO hELP VANCOUVER AChIEVE GhG EMISSION REDUCTION TARGETS

Vancouver city council unanimously adopted a Passive Design Program, consisting of a passive design toolkit for homes and one for comprehensive projects—a significant step in achieving the city’s carbon reduction goals. The toolkits detail strategies for achieving energy efficiency and improved heating comfort through building design. The move signals that the city recognizes it takes more than green building codes to achieve sustainable architecture and is committed to taking significant steps toward sustainable development. LEARN MORE

VANCOUVER’S bACKyARDS ARE TURNING INTO URbAN FARMyARDS

A vegetable patch at Vancouver’s City Hall will bring the city closer to its commitment of 2,010 community garden plots by 2010, as well as help the city really walk the talk of sustainability., city officials believe. The idea was the first “Quick Start” recommendation made by the city’s Greenest City Action Team. This plot joins the 1600 others already planted on both public and private land around the city. MORE INFO

If edible urban flora isn’t enough, VanCity dwellers can now co-dwell with (edible) fauna—chickens. In March,

37trim tab

MANuFACTurer: Steelcase, Inc

MANuFACTuriNG lOCATiON:

Grand Rapids, MI (and high Point, NC for Siento)

sOurCe lOCATiON(s) FOr rAW MATeriAls:

Not answered COMPleTeD A liFe CyCle AssessMeNT?

yes, with the University of Michigan’s Center for Sustainable Systems

ANy PersisTeNT OrGANiC POlluTANTs,

Very HiGH HAzArD CHeMiCAls, HiGH

HAzArD CHeMiCAls Or HiGHly ACuTe

TOxiCANTs [>0.1% By WeiGHT]? No

Leap, Think, Amia, Siento - Seating

read steelcase, inc.’s entire social equity policy and review other completed Building Materials Questionnaires by visiting

www.ilbi.org > resources > research > Building Material Questionnaires

Blank questionnaires can also be downloaded for use or distribution. All returned forms will be included in a public online database.

curious about building products’ social and ecological footprints?

use Cascadia’s Building Materials Questionnaire to start a dialogue about the potentially hidden impacts of product specification beyond typical metrics of cost, performance and aesthetics. For each issue of Trim Tab, we select an excerpt from a completed survey to highlight a product of interest.

Product spotlight:

ANy suBsTANCes ON THe us ePA’s TOxiC

releAse iNVeNTOry releAseD DuriNG

PrODuCTiON? Not answered

BiODeGrADABle Or reCyClABle WiTH

THe CurreNT AVAilABle PrOGrAMs AND

TeCHNOlOGies? yes, recyclable

PerCeNTAGe OF FiNAl PrODuCT WeiGHT

FrOM:

POsT-CONsuMer reCyCleD CONTeNT?

33%POsT-iNDusTriAl reCyCleD CONTeNT? 4%

MANuFACTuriNG PrACTiCes CONsisTeNT

WiTH CANADiAN AND/Or us lABOr

sTANDArDs? yes

making progress?

Do you have a lead on cutting-edge green building progress in the region?

Contact [email protected] and put “Moving Upstream News Lead” in the subject line.

MASSAChUSETTS STRETCh CODE TO CAUSE A ShRINK IN ENERGy ThANKS TO NbI CORE PERFORMANCE STANDARD

The Massachusetts Board of Building Regulations and Standards voted to adopt a stretch energy code for the state that would make new commercial buildings under 100,000 square feet up to 30% more energy efficient than base standards and reduce carbon emissions by nearly 40%. The standard is based on a protocol developed by Washington-based New Buildings Institute (NBI) called Core Performance, which enables high performance building without the need for modeling. MORE INFO


sTePPiNG TOWArD iNTeGrATeD DesiGN:

A Book review of Integrated Design: Mithun

Integrated design is a buzz-word these days, but it’s also something that architects have long recognized as valuable. Firms saw value in having urban designers, planners, interior designers, landscape architects, and engineers on staff because it enriched the process and the service offerings to clients. But business models followed educational ones, for the most part, keeping disciplines in separate silos. Many factors have urged the industry towards greater integration, which usually means architects and consultants working closer together from early in the process. The sustainable design movement has stressed the value and need for this approach. Yet even progressive leaders in this area have been slow to expand and include disciplines farther afield, such as sociologists and hydrologists. Even firms that have found ways to engage more deeply and productively with clients, stakeholders, and multiple disciplines within still often struggle to effectively engage outside consultants throughout the process. Mithun, a firm highlighted in the first of Ecotone Publishing’s new series Integrated Design, has made good on the promise of integrated design, but their example may represent the beginning of the journey, not its end.

In many ways, Integrated Design: Mithun (2008), authored by David R. Macaulay, is what a monograph should be. (Perhaps especially if one doesn’t think of other

Book review:By KirA GOulD

39trim tab

architects—who might prefer a greater proportion of full-bleed photography—as the primary audience.) This book is the Mithun story, framed by its seven eloquent principles: Grow an Idea, Expand the Boundaries, Use Nature as a Guide, Create Beauty and Spirit, Do the Math, Strengthen Community, and Bring Passion, Leave Ego. It is illustrated by nine case studies, including REI’s flagship store, the firm’s Seattle office at Pier 56, the award-winning Lloyd Crossing plan, and IslandWood School, plus references to other projects. It is an elegant, yet substantial book with solid photography and a good mix of other media.

The well-organized text tells the firm’s story from its founding by Omer Mithun in Bellevue, Washington in 1949. The story is rich with voices of Mithun team members (Mithunees); author Macaulay knows when to let their words do the work and yet doesn’t yield his responsibility to narrative and flow. Mithun is a firm whose work, people, and workplace are imbued with the spirit and sensibility of its home region, the Pacific Northwest; hearing this from them can be powerful. For other firms looking to learn about nurturing a strong culture, the monograph touches on the firm’s commitment to education, mentoring, and having fun.

For many architects, the enormity of climate change has prompted a focus on building elements that relate to energy efficiencies. A more holistic perspective is critical, and this can make the work the architect and allied professions amazingly complex. But as Yale Professor Michelle Addington has reminded us eloquently (most recently in “Harvard Design” magazine), no building is an island. Mithun’s own principles seem to remind their teams of this reality, and it results in special projects, such as the firm’s BuildCarbonNeutral.org web tool and its Climate Partnership, in which the firm shares with staff the cost of personal climate protection actions.

I was gratified to see consultant teams listed in this volume, but disappointed to find them in the back. Crediting these firms with the project stories would have helped celebrate their roles. In the mix of the rich stories of the firm’s growth and its diverse projects, I appreciated the client voices where they surfaced, but wished there were a bit more evidence of the consultants. We’ve all heard stories about the unexpected benefits of deeply integrated teams, and more voice from the consultants could have served to better support this.

In this telling, there could also have been a greater supply of “lessons learned.” There is always keen interest to know what teams would have done differently, and there must be many lessons learned in this collection of completed and conceptual projects. Good reasons often keep such laundry out of monographs, but airing it is what the profession needs, even if project teams and clients may prefer otherwise.

This speaks to a conundrum that Mithun has created for itself. The firm is clearly committed to excellence and to integrated design as the path to reaching that result with clients and communities. But in celebrating its principles and sharing glimpses of its process, we are left wanting even more—more about the details of the process, especially what didn’t work. Firms that can help themselves and the profession learn more from every project may be the next wave of true progressives.

PHOTOGRAPHS by jUAN HeRNANDez, MITHUN

Writer kIRA GOULD , Assoc. AiA, leeD AP, is Director of Communications for the architecture, community design, and consulting firm of William McDonough + Partners. she is co-author, with lance Hosey, of Women in Green: Voices of sustainable Design (ecotone Publishing, 2007). she has written for Metropolis magazine and other publications, and has lectured widely. she was the 2007 chair of the AiA Committee on the environment.


Workshops, lectures and other opportunities throughout the bioregion

event calendar: june–September 2009

FOR COMPLETE DETAILS, PLEASE VISIT OUR CALENDAR AT WWW.CASCADIAGbC.ORG/CALENDAR

tRAnsfoRMAtionAl lectuRe seRies

Guy Battle Portland, OR – 6/24 Seattle, WA – 6/25

otheR events

cAnAdA gReen building council nAtionAl suMMit Montreal, Quebec – 6/9-11

gReen bRokeR 2009

Seattle, WA - 9/17

gReen skyline touRs

Throughout British Columbia - 9/25 and 9/27

usgbc And cAgbc leed woRkshoPs, hosted by cAscAdiA Region gReen building council

gReen building oPeRAtions & MAintenAnce: the leed iMPleMentAtion PRocess

Seattle, WA – 7/24Portland, OR - 3rd week of August leed® cAnAdA-nc 1.1 technicAl Review woRkshoP

Vancouver, BC – 6/23

leed cAnAdA-ci 1.0 technicAl Review woRkshoP

Kelowna, BC - 9/23

woRkshoPs PResented by cAscAdiA

build it leed foR contRActoRs

Everett, WA – 7/23

gReen building And the building code

Hood River, OR - 9/22Hillsboro/PDX Metro - 9/23


FORwARD TO FRIeNDS:

Like What You See? Forward this to a friend and have them sign up for Trim Tab

ADveRTISe:

Want to reaCh nearLY 20,000 Leading PraCtitionerS? contact us to advertise in the next issue!

trim tab v.2 - spring 2009

Documents