triple aim design thinking - stanford medx 2014

71
Designing connected care solutions at the intersection of medicine and finance James Dias – CEO Lucas Dailey – Senior UX Designer

Upload: wellbeme

Post on 02-Dec-2014

182 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


2 download

DESCRIPTION

James Dias, CEO, and Lucas Dailey, Senior User Experience Designer, will present a workshop, “Designing connected care solutions at the intersection of medicine and finance” on Saturday, September 6th from 2:20-3:50 PM PDT. The workshop will explore how the business of performance-based healthcare requires a balance between giving patients the best possible quality outcomes and doing it in a cost effective manner. This emphasis on value-driven medicine is producing the opportunity for new technology solutions that address both care and costs. Designing effective solutions for “Connected Care” requires an interdisciplinary approach that brings together the disparate fields of healthcare economics, patient engagement, and digital technology.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Designing connected care solutionsat the intersection of medicine and finance

James Dias – CEO

Lucas Dailey – Senior UX Designer

Page 2: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

1. Introductions2. Audience Survey3. About us - Who is Wellbe

Page 3: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Part 1: A Healthcare Framework for Design

Part 2: A Case Study of Good Design

Part 3: A Workgroup Exercise (30 mins)

Agenda

Page 4: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Patient-Centric design isn’t enough

Fire starter

Page 5: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

What is Meaningful Use Stage 2?

Pop Quiz

The final rule for meaningful use Stage 2* intends to increase health information exchange between providers and promote patient engagement by giving patients secure online access to their health information.

HealthIT.Gov

Page 6: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Pop Quiz

Page 7: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Design Framework

Page 8: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

The Triple Aim

1. Improving the patient experience of care2. Improving the health of populations3. Reducing the per-capita cost of healthcare

http://www.ihi.org/Engage/Initiatives/TripleAim/pages/default.aspx

Page 9: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

The Triple AimPopulation Health

Experience of Care Per Capita Cost

Page 10: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Background - The Triple Aim

• Framework developed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement

• An approach to optimizing health system performance• Conjoin models about healthcare and financing• Create stakeholder accountability for all three dimensions,

simultaneously

Page 11: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

A Foundational Concept

Triple Aim

ONC CMS CHT ACA

The Triple Aim is a prevalent influencer in all major healthcare transformational initiatives

Page 12: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Office of National CoordinatorThe mission of ONC is to optimize the paths to reach these five health IT goals along with interoperability

to support the Triple Aim.

• Achieve adoption and information exchange through meaningful use of health IT

• Improve care, improve population health, and reduce healthcare costs through the use of health IT

• Inspire confidence and trust in health IT• Empower individuals with health IT to improve their health and the health

care system• Achieve rapid learning and technological advancement

Page 13: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Metrics

Page 14: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Metrics

Page 15: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Experience Metrics

Page 16: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Experience Metrics

Health Care

Page 17: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Cost Metrics

Page 18: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Reducing Costs

1. Lower the cost of therapies and treatments2. Improved efficiency in care delivery3. Improved choice-making4. Mitigating risks

Page 19: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Improving Experience

1. Quality of the care2. Patient Satisfaction, HCAHPS3. Alignment of expectations

Page 20: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Improving Outcomes

1. Measurable Functional Achievements2. Patient reported Outcomes Measures (PROM)3. Monitoring Activities of Daily Living4. Clinical Indicators, health status

By 2015, health care providers participating in accountable care organizations will have to provide evidence that the care they've delivered produced value for the patient—as reported by the patient.

Page 21: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Evaluating Technology

Page 22: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Primary FocusEvaluated technologies that serve

value-driven delivery and reimbursement models

Improve the Patient Experience

Evidence? Investment?

Improve the Health of Populations

Reduce Per Capita Cost of Care

Page 23: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Findings

“The most striking finding of the DHSF is that the vast majority of digital health companies do not simultaneously emphasize achievement of all three Triple Aim Components. This limited emphasis on the Triple Aim may reflect a lack of awareness or perceived value of the entire Triple Aim for health technology entrepreneurs. This finding may also indicate a market in transition from technology products that currently serve dominant fee-for-service, volume-driven health care organizations toward technologies that serve value-driven delivery and reimbursement models in the future.”

The vast majority of companies did not meet the intent of the Tripe Aim

Page 24: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

More findings

“Most technologies targeted toward Patients focus on trying to improve individual health outcomes. Very few focus on Decreasing the Costs of Care, which may be an opportunity for technology developers to create innovative applications to make consumers more fiscally informed about their health care decisions. Technologies focused on Payers and Providers are more oriented toward costs and outcomes, but suffer from a major lack of emphasis on Improving Patient Experience. “

Missing the mark!

Page 25: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Refilling Prescriptions in a Patient Portal

Case Study

Page 26: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Case Study – MyChart

• EPIC’s patient portal• Most used EMR and patient portal in US

Page 27: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Case Study – Screens

Screen Shots

Page 28: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Case Study – Key Points

• Doesn’t fulfill Triple Aim– Patient Experience: Helpful, Convenient– Population Health: marginal effect– Cost: marginal effect

• Single Use• Replaces an existing process with an online process –

incremental

Page 29: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Design Approaches

• Lean Design – good for process efficiency• Design Thinking – good for product design• Agile – good for software development

Page 30: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

The 5 Basic StepsThe Stanford d.school Design Thinking Process

Page 31: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

The 5 Basic Steps

1. EmpathizeSee the problem from the perspective of the user’s experience

2. DefineUse the 5 Why’s to define the problem, then the success criteria

3. IdeateBrainstorming solutions to meet the goals

4. PrototypeBuild prototype(s) of the solution as fast as possible

5. TestMeasure the impact of your solutions, then iterate

The Stanford d.school Design Thinking Process

Page 32: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

The 4 Basic Steps

1. Empathy: Being able to see challenges and opportunities from others’ perspectives and understand what people truly need.

2. Multi-Disciplinary Collaboration: Leveraging the creativity and intelligence of diverse perspectives to see the bigger opportunity.

3. Ideation & Prototyping: Exploring many possibilities to get to the breakthrough idea.

4. Experimentation: Testing new solutions early and often to increase the chance of marketplace success

The Rotman School’s “Business Design”

Page 33: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Keys to Success DT

• Integrative Thinking – hold two opposing thoughts in mind – simultaneously

• Encourages divergent thinking to create new choices that haven’t existed before

• Challenging prevailing assumptions - Devils Advocate, Black Hats, 10th Man.

Page 34: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Successful Design Thinking

How DT Turned Around AirBnB • Growth flat lined in 2009 and they went broke• Founder Joe Gebbia went to RISD• DT analysis helped identify the problem: Photos sucked• DT helped them find and test a solution: Photograph spaces

themselves• Test worked: revenue jumped

Page 35: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

A New Framework

Page 36: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Forging A New Framework

Triple Aim Design Thinking

Page 37: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Methodology ofDesign thinking

FrameworkOf the Triple Aim

Forging A New Framework

Page 38: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Two strategiesTriple Aim Design Thinking

Page 39: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Use Three-stakeholder Lens

Provider Patient Payer

Page 40: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Design for the Future

Page 41: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

The Value ofTriple Aim Design Thinking

• Better alignment with systemic challenges• Creates clear and compelling value• Unveils new avenues for transformation• Opens commercial opportunities

Page 42: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Name one of the more popular apps or sites that people use for their healthcare.

Pop Quiz

iTriage WebMD YouTube

Page 43: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Healthcare Challenges

Page 44: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

A Seeming Contradiction

Improve quality and lower cost. Oftentimes, quality, profitability and sustainability operate at odds with each other.

Page 45: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

No Two Patients

• Vast differences in demographics• Changing Expectations• No one wants to be there

Page 46: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Fragmentation Everywhere

• Siloed, disconnected processes and systems• Diverse, un-coordinated care delivery• Compartmentalized data and limited visibility• Poor patient experiences across transitions

Page 47: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Healthcare Culture

• Necessarily, Risk averse• Deference to authority• Submissive patients

Page 48: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

What is the largest segment of the healthcare consumer market?

Pop Quiz

Page 49: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Pop Quiz

Page 50: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Showcase - Virtuwell

Page 51: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Screenshot

Showcase 1 - Virtuwell

Page 52: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Screenshot

Showcase 1 - Virtuwell

Page 53: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Screenshot

Showcase 1 - Virtuwell

Page 54: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Screenshot

Showcase 1 - Virtuwell

Page 55: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Screenshot

Showcase 1 - Virtuwell

Page 56: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Screenshot

Showcase 1 - Virtuwell

Page 57: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Positive Experience: High convenience

Population health: Quick diagnosis and treatment; better health outcomes

Cost: Savings with a new delivery model

Virtuwell – Triple Aim

Page 58: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

In 2014, what percentage of US Physicians communicate electronically with their patients?

Pop Quiz

a) 74%b) 39%c) 15%d) 7%

Page 59: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014
Page 60: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Triple Aim Design Thinking Exercise

Page 61: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Empathize

Define

Ideate

Prototype

Test

Triple Aim Design Thinking Exercise

Page 62: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Case Study – Screens

Screen Shots

Page 63: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Redesign the medications refill element of a patient portal.

Triple Aim Design Thinking Exercise

Page 64: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Focus on Cost:

An 2013 NEHI study found medication reconciliation cost the industry $26 billion

An Institute of Medicine found medication reconciliation to be the most common medical error

Triple Aim Design Thinking Exercise

Page 65: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Exercise - 25 Minutes

1. Why don’t patients take their medications (properly)?

2. How could the medication refill part of a patient portal help, while reducing costs?

Page 66: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Nota bene:

Ignore technical constraints!

Page 67: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Exercise - 25 Minutes1. Why don’t patients take their

medications properly?

2. How could the medication refill part of a patient portal help, while meeting the Triple Aim?

Ignore technical constraints!

Page 68: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Exercise - 5 Minutes

1. Share your tables’ ideas with the room

Page 69: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

What did we learn?

What insights did we uncover?

Wrap-Up Discussion

Page 70: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

Triple Aim Design Thinking

Take away 2

Takeaway 3

Restate the Takeaways

Page 71: Triple Aim Design Thinking - Stanford MedX 2014

James Dias – [email protected]

Lucas Dailey – Senior UX [email protected]

Deck on Slideshare – tweet #TripleaimDesignthinking