triple bottom line savings for rio tinto

19
Improving Longwall Hydraulics Kestrel Coal Case Study Tristan Lovell

Upload: informa-australia

Post on 16-May-2015

239 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Tristan Lovell, Asset management superintendent – from Kestrel Mine, Rio Tinto delivered this presentation at 2012 Longwall conference in the Hunter Valley Australia. Building on eleven years of excellence it’s rare that such a large gathering of underground coal operators come together under the one roof, providing a great opportunity to catch up with friends, industry leaders, former colleagues and longwall mining specialists. For more information, please visit: http://www.longwallconference.com.au

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

Improving Longwall Hydraulics –Kestrel Coal Case StudyTristan Lovell

Page 2: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

22 October 2012

Summary

This presentation will cover:

• Kestrel Location

• Longwall Equipment

• A brief history of Kestrels Longwall Hydraulics

• Improvements

• Lessons Learnt

Page 3: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

Kestrel Mine in production

since 2002

Kestrel Mine Extension

production forecast in 2013

Operations are adjacent to

agricultural land use

Page 4: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

22 October 2012

Longwall Equipment

Equipment Kestrel Mine

Shearer Cat EL3000

Roof supports 146 x 860t + PM4

AFC 855kw CST P drive M-gate

855kw CST KP drive T-gate

Pump station SES (900 L/min) + Kamat (900 L/min)

Crusher 250 kw drive unit

BSL 400 kw drive unit

Monorail Macquarie system

Nameplate capacity 2500 tonnes per hour

Page 5: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

Kestrels Longwall Hydraulics – A brief history

• The Longwall Shield hydraulic arrangement at Kestrel Mine consisted of a

single pump station arrangement being fed by an underground mix of oil

and water to create an emulsion.

• The system used a mechanical mix system and back up venturi style

mixing unit to siphon oil and water together

• The system also utilised an oil pod arrangement that required replenishing

every second or third day.

• This system of supply was logistically inefficient.

Tanker fills

bulk surface

tank with oil

Supply team

fill oil pod on

surface and

transport

underground

Empty pod

swapped with

full pod and

transported to

surface

Page 6: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

Kestrels Longwall Hydraulics – A brief history

• The water supply used for Kestrels emulsion mix began as filtered raw

water:

• This system performed adequately for a number of years….

Surface filtration

system

Underground sand

filter pod

Mixed with

oil

Offsite

supply

Page 7: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

22 October 2012

Kestrels Longwall Hydraulics – A brief history

• During the 2008 flood event in the Emerald region sediment build-up in

the local water supply increased dramatically.

• The raw water filtration system was inadequate to keep up.

Valve damage from contamination.Raw water filters often overloaded & by passed

Page 8: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

Improving the system

• During this flood event – the hydraulic performance of the longwall shields

became diminished and a spotlight on the system was shone.

• An assessment of the system was undertaken and a number of key areas

for improvement were identified:

• Water quality – absolute and minimal variability

• Fluid control – a higher level of consistent ratio Water to oil mix was

required

• Environmental Quality – the impact of the hydraulic component of

the mixed product needed be minimised.

Page 9: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

22 October 2012

Improved Water quality

After the flood event of 2008, a dedicated water line run from the onsite

water treatment plant was installed into the underground Longwall panel.

By taking water directly from the water treatment plant, variability in water

quality could be eliminated and high quality clean water could be used to

mix emulsion.

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

300.00

350.00

2007-1

2007-2

2007-3

2007-4

2007-5

2007-6

2007-7

2007-8

2007-9

2007-1

0

2007-1

1

2007-1

2

2008-1

2008-2

2008-3

2008-4

2008-5

2008-6

2008-7

2008-8

2008-9

2008-1

0

2008-1

1

2008-1

2

2009-1

2009-2

2009-3

2009-4

2009-5

2009-6

2009-7

2009-8

2009-9

2009-1

0

2009-1

1

2009-1

2

Usag

e R

ate

(L

/m)

Months

Emulsion Usage Rate

FLOOD EVENT INTRODUCTION OF

TREATED WATER

CLEANING SYSTEM

Page 10: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

22 October 2012

Improved Fluid Control

At the beginning of 2010, a Q-mix surface mixing plant was installed.

With the underground mechanical mix on demand system, concentration would vary by up to

75% of target concentration.

The Q-mix PLC controlled system reliably maintains +/- 0.1% accuracy, continuously monitors

the fluids other essential properties, and ensures that the longwall is delivered the highest

quality fluid at all times.

Mixing plant control module Kestrel Citect diagram

Page 11: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

22 October 2012

Improvement: Synthetic fluid

Converted to new technology synthetic fluid, Quintolubric with:

• Increased corrosion protection

• Higher lubricity

• Cleaner operation

• Lower operating concentration (2%)

• Higher safety

• Lower environmental impact

Page 12: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

Improved Environmental Footprint

No mineral oil from hydraulic leaks

Biodegradable 97% in 28 days

Reduced Chemical Oxygen demand (COD) by 75%

Reduced risk of impact on ground waters

Page 13: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

22 October 2012

Improved Cleanliness 1. Reduce filter usage

2. Increase life of HP pumps and reduce seal gland replacement

3. Expand solenoid valve life

Page 14: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

22 October 2012

Improved filtration

Emulsion Fluid

Filter

Particles

Synthetic fluid

Oil Particles

Increased Contamination capacity & lifetime• Less oily residues

• No water soap residues

• No antifoam residues

• Higher efficiency through thicker caking

Page 15: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

Profile filter use over time

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Nu

mb

er

of

Filte

rs U

sed

Week

Almost complete elimination of

profile filter usage over 4 years

Page 16: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

22 October 2012

Improved Pump station performance

Decrease Contamination

• No mineral oil to soften seals

• No particles agglomeration to wear plunger

• No aeration to expand and destroy plunger surface

• Improved pump efficiency through less foaming

Lower Maintenance cost

• Seals change out time decrease by 2 times

• Extend ceramic plunger life

Productivity Improvement

• To replace damage parts for the high pressure pumps

Page 17: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

22 October 2012

Improved solenoid performance

Decrease Contamination

• No fatty acid soaps to block the solenoid valves

• No antifoam blocking the solenoids

Lower Maintenance cost

• Solenoid change out decrease significantly

Productivity Improvement

• To replace solenoids

Page 18: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

Solenoid Usage Over Time

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Nu

mb

er

of

So

len

oid

s U

sed

Week

Downward trend of solenoid

usage over 4 years

Page 19: Triple Bottom Line Savings for Rio Tinto

Lessons Learnt

• The longwall shield hydraulic system is key to the assets health

• A set and forget approach to shield fluid systems will eventually lead to significant loss in productivity and an increase in material cost

• Active measurement and management of the use of hydraulic fluid will ensure an operation understands its systems health

• Increased performance, environmental improvement and cost reduction do live happily together – efficient solutions can and will yield all three

• An active interest in the technology advances available will ensure even aging assets can keep up with the latest standards and perform well.