tsp grade card 2010

8/9/2019 TSP Grade Card 2010

1/7

To meet a test indicatorfor grades

3-8 and 10, atleast 75% ofstudents

testedmustscoreproficientor higher

on that test. Other indicator requirements are:

11thgradeOhio Graduation Tests,85%; Attendance

Rate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%.

StateIndicators

2009-2010 School Year Report Card

The state requirement is 75 percent








3rd Grade Achievement

1. Reading2. Mathematics

4th Grade Achievement

3. Reading

4. Mathematics


5. Reading

6. Mathematics

7. Science


8. Reading

9. Mathematics


10. Reading

11. Mathematics


12. Reading

13. Mathematics

14. Science

Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade)

15. Reading

16. Mathematics

17. Writing

18. Science

19. Social Studies

Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)

20. Reading

21. Mathematics

22. Writing

23. Science

24. Social Studies

Attendance Rate

25. All Grades

2008-09 Graduation Rate

26. District



The six designations are Excellent with Distinction Excellent Effective Continuous Improvement

Academic Watch Academic Emergency

Value-AddedAdequateYearly Progress

PerformanceIndex

Indicators

The District Report Card for the2009-2010 school year shows theprogress districts have madebased on four measures ofperformance.

The combination of the fourmeasures is the basis forassigning state designationsto districts, buildings andcommunity schools.

Your DistrictsDesignation: Number of State

IndicatorsMet out of 26

PerformanceIndex

StateIndicators Performance

Index

Value-AddedMeasure

Your District

2009-2010

Similar Districts

2009-2010

State

2009-2010

Percentage of Students at and above the Proficient Level

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov

Value-AddedMeasure

State

Indicators

District Improvement(0-120 points)

AYP

*

**

Any result at or above the state standard is indicated by a .

SimilarDistrictsare basedon comparingdemographic, socioeconomicand geographicfactors. Cumulativeresults forstudents whotook thetestsas 10thor 11th graders.***

-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

88.3 %

83.5 %

90.5 %

76.2 %

84.0 %

94.9 %

83.7 %

IRN # 044909

Continuous

Improvement 4 82.6

Not Met

Improvement Year 4

Toledo City School District420 E Manhattan Blvd, Toledo, OH 43608-1200 - Lucas County

Current Superintendent: Jerome Pecko (419) 671-8200

67.5 %64.0 %

67.1 %

66.5 %

56.7 %

53.2 %

49.8 %

72.5 %

63.0 %

60.0 %

45.3 %

60.5 %

39.0 %

34.3 %

72.2 %

70.8 %

79.2 %

59.7 %

71.4 %

63.1 %59.9 %

78.4 %76.9 %

64.3 %

57.8 %

81 %

76.2 %

52.7 %

45.5 %

44.8 %

71.8 %

67 %

69.9 %

84.1 %

77.4 %

68.4 %

57.6 %

80.2 %

71.1 %

62.8 %

49.2 %

80.9 %

69.2 %

64.8 %

64.9 %

47.9 %

38.1 %

83 %

80.4 %

84.1 %

73 %

79.6 %

73.3 %

69.1 %

76.2 %

55.8 %

68.5 %

91.6 %

89.2 %

93.2 %

85.1 %

88.7 %

94.3 %

83 %

88.0 %

83.0 %

90.9 %

74.2 %

81.9 %

94.0 %

74.6 %

- = below


2/7

2

All students in the district for a full academic year are included in the results.

The StateIndicators are

based on stateassessments, as wellas on attendance andgraduation rates.To earn an indicator

for Achievement or

Graduation Tests, atleast 75% of studentsmust reach proficientor above for the givenassessment.For the 11th grade OhioGraduationTestsindicators,a cumulative 85%passagerate for each assessmentis required.

StateIndicators

Your Districts Assessment Results Over Time

Cumulative results for students who took the tests as 10th or 11th graders.*

StateStandard

-75%

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

3rd Grade Achievement

07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

66.4 65.6 67.5 66.0 71.0 64.0

--------------------------------------

StateStandard

-75%

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%


07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

68.8 69.9 67.1 59.2 65.0 66.5

--------------------------------------

StateS

tandard-75%

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

Science


07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

56.3 54.8 56.7 43.1 44.5 53.2 44.9 51.2 49.8

------------------------------------------------------

StateS

tandard-75%

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%


07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

6 2.3 63 .7 7 2. 5 52 .2 53 .6 6 3. 0

--------------------------------

StateStandard-75%

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%


07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

54. 5 53.2 60. 0 36. 6 49.1 45. 3

--------------------------------

StateStandard-75%

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

Science


07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

62.4 47.5 6 0.5 46.4 36.5 3 9.0 31.6 32.9 34.3

------------------------------------------------------

StateStandard-75%

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

OhioGraduationTests (10thGrade)

Reading WritingMathematics Science Social Studies

07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

76.7 7 7.9 7 2.2 64.0 6 9.7 70.8 81.7 8 8.7 79.2 55.6 6 0.6 59.7 66.9 72.3 71.4

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

StateStandard-85%

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

OhioGraduationTests (11thGrade)

Reading WritingMathematics Science Social Studies

*

07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

88.7 87.5 88.3 79.5 8 1.3 83.5 90.5 8 8.6 90.5 69.8 7 1.5 7 6.2 79.1 81.5 84.0

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Toledo City School District, Lucas County


3/7

Overall CompositeScores reflect grade level and overall composite

ratings for the 2009-2010 school year.

Value-Added Measure

Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Reading

Mathematics

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov

Your districts Value-Added rating represents the progress yourdistrict has made with its students since last school year.In contrast, achievement scores represent students performance at apoint in time. A score of Above indicates greater than one year of

progress has been achieved; Met indicates one year of progress has beenachieved; Below indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved.

Value-AddedMeasure

-

+

AboveExpected Growth

MetExpected Growth

BelowExpected Growth

=

=

=

Legend

Performance Index

Performance Level Across Grades3-8 and 10 for all Tested Subjects

(Includes every student enrolled in

the district for a full academic year)

X =WeightPercentage Points

Performance Index Calculations

for the 2009-2010 School Year

Untested

Limited

Basic

Proficient

Accelerated

Advanced

X

X

X

X

X

X

=

=

=

=

=

=

The PerformanceIndex reflects theachievement ofevery studentenrolled for the fullacademic

year. The Performance Index is a

weighted average that includes alltested subjects and grades anduntested students. The greatestweight is given to advanced scores(1.2); the weights decrease for eachperformance level and a weight ofzero is given to untested students.This results in a scale from 0 to 120points. The Performance Index can becompared across years to showdistrict achievement trends.

PerformanceIndex

2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008

Performance Index Over Time

Your Districts Performance Index

0.8

15.0

24.2

34.4

15.4

10.1

4.5

14.5

34.4

17.0

12.1

82.6 81.0 80.1

82.6

Toledo City School District, Lucas Coun

-- - +

- + -

0.00.0

0.3

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.2


4/7

4

Grades 3-8 and 10

Reading

and

Mathematics

Adequate Yearly

Progress

AllStu

dents

PercentProficient

PercentTested

Econo

mica

llyDis

adva

ntage

d

Asia

n/Pac

ificIslan

der

Black

,non

-Hisp

anic

Ameri

can I

ndian

/Alas

kaNativ

e

Hispa

nic

Multi-

Racia

l

White

,non

-Hisp

anic

Students

with

Disab

ilities

Limite

d Eng

lishPro

ficien

t

Reading

Mathematics

Reading

Mathematics

Graduation Rate*

Attendance Rate*

Legend

Not applicable.

NR

N/A

Met

Not Met

Not Required This indicator was not evaluated for this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statisti-cally reliable result. 30 students is the minimum size for the proficiency and non-test indicators, while 40 is the minimum size for the participation rate indicators.

This subgroup met AYP for this indicator with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harbor, or growth measure results.

This subgroup did not meet AYP for this indicator.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Reading

Proficiency:

Mathematics

Proficiency:

Reading

Participation:

Mathematics

Participation:

Attendance

Rate:

AYP Determinatio

by Indicator

Graduation

Rate:

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a federally required measure. Every schoolanddistrict must meet AYP goalsthat are set for Readingand Mathematics

Proficiency and Participation, Attendance Rate, and GraduationRate. These goals are applied to ten student groups: All Students,Economically Disadvantaged Students, Asian/Pacific IslanderStudents, Black, non-Hispanic Students, American Indian/AlaskaNative Students, Hispanic Students, Multi-Racial Students, White,

non-Hispanic Students, Students with Disabilities (IEP), and Students withLimited English Proficiency (LEP). If any one of these groups does not meetAYP in Reading or Mathematics Proficiency, or in Participation, AttendanceRate, or Graduation Rate, then the school or district does not meet AYP.Not meeting AYP for consecutive years will have both federal and stateconsequences. Federal consequences could include a school or district beingidentified for improvement. State consequences could include a reductionin the states rating designation.

AYP

AYP Determination

by Subgroup

AYP

Determinationfor Your District:

This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this years AYP goals.

For test indicators, AYP can be met in one of four ways:

1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;

2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;

3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harbor;

4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results.

For non-test indicators, AYP can be met in one of three ways:

1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;

2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;

3) making improvement over the previous year.

* The non-test indicators used for overall AYP (Attendance Rate and Graduation Rate)are evaluated only for the All Students subgroup.

2008-2009Graduation Rate Information

The disaggregated graduation rates of your district are provided forinformational purposes only andare not used for your AYP determination.

HispanicWhite,

non-HispanicLimited English

Proficient Multi-RacialStudents with

Disabilities

Black,non-Hispanic

Asian orPacific Islander

American Indian/Alaska Native

Econ.Disadvtgd

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met


Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Not Met

Not Met

Met

Met

Not Met

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Not Met

Not Met

Met

Met

Not Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Not M

Not M

Met

Met

Met

Met

Not M

-- >95% 81.7% 78.7%

77.1% 81.8% 87.5% 72.6% 86.8%


5/7

Under the federalNo Child Left BehindAct, states are

required to reportcertain data aboutschoolsandteachers.Data presented hereare for reportingpurposes only andare not used in thecomputation of thestate designationfor districts andschools.


Reading

WritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies

ReadingWritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies

ReadingWritingMathematicsScience

Social Studies



Black,non-Hispanic

AmericanIndian/

Alaska Native

Asian orPacific

IslanderHispanic

Multi-Racial

White,non-Hispanic

Non-DisabledStudents

Studentswith

DisabilitiesMigrant

Non-Econ.

Disadvtgd

Econ.Disadvtgd

LimitedEnglish

ProficientFemale Male

Your District's Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level

Percentage of Students Scoring Limited

Percentage of Students Scoring Basic

Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient

Percentage of Students Scoring Accelerated

Percentage of Students Scoring Advanced

State and Federally Required District Information

Number of Limited English Proficient StudentsExcluded from Accountability Calculations

All Schools inYour District

High-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*

Low-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*

Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelors Degree

Percentage of teachers with at least a Masters Degree

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses not taught by highly qualified teachers

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses taught by properly certified teachers

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught byteachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure

*High-poverty schools arethoserankedin thetop quartilebasedon thepercentageof economicallydisadvantagedstudents.Low-poverty schoolsare those ranked in thebottomquartile based on thepercent

of economicallydisadvantaged students. A districtmay havebuildingsin bothquartiles, in justone quartileor in neitherquartile.

Federally Required School Teacher Information


Average DailyStudent

Enrollment

Black,non-

Hispanic

American

Indian or

Alaska Native

Asian orPacific

IslanderHispanic Multi-Racial

White,non-

Hispanic

Studentswith

DisabilitiesMigrant

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

LimitedEnglish

Proficient

Your Districts Students 2009-2010

--

25195 45.0% 0.1% 0.6% 8.4% 5.0% 40.8% 66.6% 1.5% 19.2% --


99.5

52.9

1.8

92.2

99.5

54.3

2.0

92.4

25.722.829.448.222.2

--

--------

7.7

0.07.73.70.0

10.1

8.013.612.513.0

8.9

9.112.610.812.1

8.6

3.410.66.07.8

8.7

0.512.58.75.4

35.1

27.842.731.747.2

--

--------

7.9

2.510.97.48.7

16.4

8.721.616.517.6

11.4

4.217.813.413.1

12.0

5.018.87.2

10.0

16.1

6.719.013.113.0

----------

4.610.012.325.910.0

21.16.0

23.837.88.0

18.73.0

26.234.612.1

16.69.5

18.430.39.9

17.28.0

21.336.311.8

36.747.935.250.632.2

----------

15.111.518.030.212.5

23.519.226.544.018.7

25.715.025.149.320.0

19.111.224.241.214.7

22.819.223.737.216.3

37.850.028.021.3

33.3

--------

--

40.030.032.325.9

20.0

43.863.036.627.8

40.0

43.460.634.431.4

39.4

40.249.334.230.4

30.9

44.958.336.530.5

37.9

17.817.512.08.1

10.3

--------

--

39.750.232.429.2

32.5

39.651.631.424.4

33.2

41.455.034.027.5

40.0

41.850.833.126.3

34.7

37.650.930.425.8

31.1

10.719.09.27.1

15.0

----------

27.760.020.029.630.0

18.023.014.815.123.0

18.124.214.416.824.2

21.037.118.620.520.6

19.233.216.616.522.2

3.71.33.23.40.9

----------

22.835.319.620.120.6

13.319.111.510.616.0

14.125.013.17.25.0

17.433.313.913.120.9

15.121.614.014.715.9

5.31.35.62.9

11.5

20.5

6.927.920.518.0

----------

20.00.0

27.714.840.0

7.00.0

11.26.8

16.0

10.93.0

12.46.5

12.1

13.70.7

18.312.830.9

10.00.0

13.28.0

22.6

6.75.66.96.29.4

----------

14.50.6

19.013.225.6

7.21.48.94.6

14.5

6.80.08.98.7

25.0

10.40.5

11.06.1

16.6

8.51.5

12.99.1

23.7

0.0 0.0 --

0.0

0.0

--

--


6/7

6

Every school in SI has to create animprovement plan. If a school in SIreceives federal funds, it may have tooffer Public School Choice and/orSupplemental Educational Services.

Being in SI for three or more yearsrequires more extensive correctiveactions and, eventually, restructuring.

Generally, a school will enter SchoolImprovement (SI) after missing AYP

for two consecutive years, and it canexit SI only after meeting AYP for two

consecutive years.

Name of the School & Years in Improvement

Name of Schools Identified for Improvement and Years in Improvement Status

Schools in School Improvement

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),oftenreferred to as The Nations Report Card, is theonly nationally representativeandcontinuingassessment that enables the comparision of performance in Ohio and other states in varioussubjectareas. Schools and students within each state are selected randomly to be a part of theassessment. Not all students inthe state or in a particular school take the assessment.Data are reported atthe state level only,and there are no individual student or evenschoolsummaryresults. Theassessments are conductedin mathematics, reading,science, writing,thearts, civics, economics, geography andU.S. history.

To view Ohios most recentNAEP results,

go to:

and search for key word NAEP

http://education.ohio.gov

Allied Health Academy 3 Arlington Elementary School 3

Birmingham Elementary School 4 Bowsher High School 5

Burroughs Elementary School 2 Byrnedale Middle School 6

Chase STEM Academy 7 DeVeaux Middle School 5

East Broadway Middle School 6 East Side Central Elementary School 3

Fulton Achievement Center 3 Garfield Elementary School 6

Glenwood Elementary School 1 Hawkins Elementary School 4

Humanities Academy 3 Keyser Elementary School 4

Lagrange Elementary School 4 Leverette Middle School 7

Longfellow Elementary School 4 Marshall Elementary School 4

McTigue Middle School 7 Navarre Elementary School 4

Oakdale Elementary School 4 Pickett Elementary School 11

Rosa Parks Elementary School 7 Samuel M. Jones at Gunckel Park Middle 7 Science Math And Related Techn. Academy 3

Sherman Elementary School 4 Waite High School 3 Walbridge Elementary School 2

Westfield Elementary School 1 Whittier Elementary School 4 Woodward High School 7



7/7

1. If a district meets AYP in the current year, it can berated no lower than Continuous Improvement.

2. If a district does not meet AYP for three consecutiveyears and in the current year it does not meet AYP inmore than one student group, it can be rated no

higher than Continuous Improvement.3. In all other cases, AYP has no effect on the

preliminary designation. Thus, the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.

Once the preliminary designation is determined, Value-Added,the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluatedto determine the impact (if any) on the districts finaldesignation.

1. If your districts rating is restricted to ContinuousImprovement due to AYP, then Value-Added will have noimpact on the designation and the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.

2. If your district experiences above expected growth for atleast two consecutive years, your districts finaldesignation will increase by one designation.

3. If your district experiences below expected growth for atleast three consecutive years, your districts finaldesignation will decrease by one designation.

The preliminary designation results from identifying thehigher value between the percentage of indicators met byyour district and your districts performance index. AYPthen is evaluated to determine its effect on the preliminarydesignation. There are three ways in which AYP can affectthe preliminary designation.

Determining Your District's Rating

Indicators Met Performance Index Score AYP Status Preliminary Designation94%-100% 100 to 120or

or

or

or

or

and

and

and

and

and

andand

Met or Not Met Excellent

75%-93.9%

0%-74.9%

50%-74.9%

31%-49.9%

0%-30.9%

90 to 99.9

80 to 89.9

0 to 89.9

70 to 79.9

0 to 69.9

Met or Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Met

Effective

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

Continuous

Improvement

=

=

=

=

=

=

Preliminary Designation Value-Added Measure* Final Designation

Excellent

Effective

Continuous Improvement

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive yearsand

and

and

and

and

Excellent with Distinction

Effective

Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years


Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years







Excellent


Academic Emergency

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency


Academic Watch

Effective

*In all other cases, including if your districts designation has been restricted to Continuous Improvement, then Value-Added will haveno impact on the designation and the preliminary designation becomes the final designation.

or

or

or

or

or

Determiningyour districts reportcard designationis a multi-stepprocess. Thefirst stepis to determinea preliminary designation,whichis basedon the following components:1)the percentage of indicators met, 2)the performanceindexand 3) AYPdetermination.


tsp grade card 2010

Documents