tudge, c. (2002). natural born killers. new scientist, 174(2342), 36

5
EBSCO Publishing Citation Format: APA (American Psychological Assoc.): NOTE: Review the instructions at http://support.ebsco.com.oxfordbrookes.idm.oclc.org/help/? int=ehost&lang=&feature_id=APA and make any necessary corrections before using. Pay special attention to personal names, capitalization, and dates. Always consult your library resources for the exact formatting and punctuation guidelines. References Tudge, C. (2002). NATURAL BORN KILLERS. New Scientist, 174(2342), 36. <!Additional Information: Persistent link to this record (Permalink): http://search.ebscohost.com.oxfordbrookes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx? direct=true&db=a9h&AN=6728518&site=ehostlive End of citation> NATURAL BORN KILLERS THE MAKINGS OF A SUICIDE BOMBER LIE IN THE BIOLOGY THAT SHAPED US ALL, SAYS COLIN TUDGE REVENGE might make us feel better, but in the end it is not the point. What matters is to make the world safer, and for that we need some inkling of why people who are neither mad nor stupid kill people they have never even met. We need a feel for the conditions that promote such behaviour and the mindset that leads to it. In short, we need some insight into that elusive quality known as human nature. But what has emerged most starkly from 11 September is that we haven't a clue; or none, at least, that has enabled the world's leaders to improve on simple retaliation, which may be high tech in execution but in strategy belongs to the Stone Age. To probe our own nature we should wherever possible bring science to bear, because its ideas are testable and so can be worked on and improved. With luck, it can move us beyond mere opinion. One obvious approach is to look at our own biology, for although we think of ourselves in ethereal terms—theologians speak of the soul, and Aristotle declared that we are “political animals”—we are also creatures of biology, evolved like any other, and it must be sensible to ask what that implies. For this we have to turn to the branch of biology known as evolutionary psychology. Mere biology would scarcely seem up to the task of explaining why young men and women should sacrifice their own lives as suicide bombers. Their behaviour seems both shocking and incomprehensible, a cue for politicians to rage about “fanaticism” and resurrect the cold war concept of “brainwashing”. Yet the term “fanaticism” taken alone has no explanatory value, and is often racist: the implication is that Muslims in general and Arabs in particular are prone to such behaviour, together perhaps with the northern Irish. This behaviour, it's implied, is innately pathological, and defies understanding. It cannot be seen as part of our evolved nature. Can't it? A whole number of creatures from all sections of the phylogenetic tree, including many

Upload: mihai-rusu

Post on 08-Sep-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Tudge, c. (2002). Natural Born Killers. New Scientist, 174(2342), 36.

TRANSCRIPT

  • 5/2/2015 EBSCOhost

    http://web.b.ebscohost.com.oxfordbrookes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/delivery?sid=c8fd6c7d9c6943159491e34b0cc7230d%40sessionmgr110&vid=1&hid=107 1/5

    EBSCOPublishingCitationFormat:APA(AmericanPsychologicalAssoc.):

    NOTE: Review the instructions at http://support.ebsco.com.oxfordbrookes.idm.oclc.org/help/?int=ehost&lang=&feature_id=APA and make any necessary corrections before using.Pay specialattentiontopersonalnames,capitalization,anddates.Alwaysconsultyourlibraryresourcesfortheexactformattingandpunctuationguidelines.

    ReferencesTudge,C.(2002).NATURALBORNKILLERS.NewScientist,174(2342),36.

    NATURALBORNKILLERSTHEMAKINGSOFASUICIDEBOMBERLIEINTHEBIOLOGYTHATSHAPEDUSALL,SAYSCOLINTUDGEREVENGEmightmakeusfeelbetter,butintheenditisnotthepoint.Whatmattersistomaketheworld safer, and for thatweneed some inkling ofwhy peoplewhoare neithermadnorstupid kill people theyhaveneverevenmet.Weneeda feel for theconditions thatpromotesuchbehaviourandthemindsetthatleadstoit.Inshort,weneedsomeinsightintothatelusivequalityknownashumannature.

    Butwhathasemergedmoststarklyfrom11Septemberisthatwehaven'taclueornone,atleast,thathasenabledtheworld'sleaderstoimproveonsimpleretaliation,whichmaybehightechinexecutionbutinstrategybelongstotheStoneAge.Toprobeourownnatureweshouldwhereverpossiblebringsciencetobear,becauseitsideasaretestableandsocanbeworkedonandimproved.Withluck,itcanmoveusbeyondmereopinion.Oneobviousapproachistolook at our own biology, for although we think of ourselves in ethereal termstheologiansspeakofthesoul,andAristotledeclaredthatwearepoliticalanimalswearealsocreaturesofbiology,evolvedlikeanyother,anditmustbesensibletoaskwhatthatimplies.Forthiswehavetoturntothebranchofbiologyknownasevolutionarypsychology.

    Merebiologywould scarcely seemup to the taskof explainingwhy youngmenandwomenshouldsacrificetheirownlivesassuicidebombers.Theirbehaviourseemsbothshockingandincomprehensible, a cue for politicians to rage about fanaticism and resurrect the coldwarconceptofbrainwashing.Yetthetermfanaticismtakenalonehasnoexplanatoryvalue,andisoften racist: the implication is thatMuslims ingeneralandArabs inparticularareprone tosuchbehaviour,togetherperhapswiththenorthernIrish.Thisbehaviour,it'simplied,isinnatelypathological,anddefiesunderstanding.Itcannotbeseenaspartofourevolvednature.

    Can'tit?Awholenumberofcreaturesfromallsectionsofthephylogenetictree,includingmany

  • 5/2/2015 EBSCOhost

    http://web.b.ebscohost.com.oxfordbrookes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/delivery?sid=c8fd6c7d9c6943159491e34b0cc7230d%40sessionmgr110&vid=1&hid=107 2/5

    that have no brains to be washed and certainly follow no religion, are known to sacrificethemselvesinallkindsofcircumstances.Thedrivingforcesareclearlygenetic,asitispossibleinprincipletoshowhowsuchbehavioursmayfollowMendelianpatternsofinheritance,andtheunderlyingreasonscanbeanalysedaccordingtotherulesofgametheory.

    TheubiquitousgutbacteriumEscherichia coli providesa casestudy (Selection, vol 1, p51).TwoscientistsatMichiganStateUniversity,RichardLenskiandGregVelicer,foundthatwhennutrients are in short supply, different strains of the bacterium engage in chemical warfare.Individualswithineachstrainproducetoxinscalledcolicinsthatkillbacteriaofotherstrainsbutnottheirown.Butthere'sasnag.Individualbacteriathatproducethetoxinkillthemselvesintheprocess, just as a honeybee does when it stings or, as Lenski and Velicer point out, like asuicide bomber (and they wrote their paper well before September 2001). Selfsacrificemakes evolutionary sense because the gene that promotes the behaviour is also containedwithinotherbacteriaofthesamegenotype.Allindividualsofagivengenotypewillcontainthecolicingene,butonlyafewactuallyproducethetoxinandsosacrificethemselvesonbehalfoftheothers.Gametheoryanalysiscanshowwhatproportionwillemergeassuicidebombers.

    Humans,ofcourse,arenotbacteria.Itwould,however,beasignificantmetaphysicalconceittosupposethatwecanlearnnothingfromothercreatures.Wehavegenestoo,andtheyinfluenceourbehaviour.The rulesofgeneticsareuniversal, so thesamebroad forces that shape thegeneralbehaviouralstrategiesofallcreaturesmustapplytoustoo.Specifically,broadbiologicalprinciplestellusthat,whateverthespecies,itisnotsurprisingthatsomeindividualsinasocietyandnot just thosewhoarepathologicallyprone to fanaticismmightsacrifice themselvesfortherest.

    Inourownspecies,suicidebombersandhijackerswillingtodieforthecausearemoreoftenyoungmenratherthanwomen.FemalesuicidebombershaverecentlystruckseveraltimesinIsrael, and the Tamil Tigers, who have carried out many more suicide bombings than thePalestinians,havealsoemployedwomenbombers,butyoungmalebombersare in thegreatmajority.Nooneissurprisedbythis,becauseamongallcategoriesofhumanbeingmaleandfemale,youngandoldit'syoungmenwhoare thebiggest risktakers,not just inmattersofphysicalprowessbutinallaspectsoflife.

    This tendencymaywellderivedirectly from reproductivephysiology.Femaleswhoare fertileandwanttohaveababyaregenerallyabletodoso.Malescaninprincipleimpregnateagreatmanymatesbutthisincreasesthecompetitionbetweenthem,sotheycaneasilyfinishupwithnomatesatall,andoftendo.Malescan'tbecertainof reproducingwithout takingrisks: theycannotsimplywaitforamatetocall.Thosewhoriskallmightdieintheattempt,butthisisnoworsegeneticallyspeakingthansittingaroundanddyingchildlesstheymight,byriskingall,doverywellindeed.Faintheartneverwonfairlady.

    Youngmen'spropensityforriskiseasilyquantifiedinviolentcrime.Thusintheirclassicstudyoverseveraldecades,MartinDalyandMargoWilsonofMcMasterUniversityinOntarioshowedthat in all societies, young men commit the overwhelming majority of murders. Of course,humanbehaviourisextremelyflexibleandtheenvironmenthasahugebearingonthelikelihoodthatanyoneperson,maleor female,youngorold,willcommitmurder.MorewomencommitmurderinPhiladelphiathanmendoinIceland.Setuptherightcomparisonandyoucanfinda

  • 5/2/2015 EBSCOhost

    http://web.b.ebscohost.com.oxfordbrookes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/delivery?sid=c8fd6c7d9c6943159491e34b0cc7230d%40sessionmgr110&vid=1&hid=107 3/5

    group of women who are more violent than a group of men. But still, male murderers inPhiladelphiaoutstripPhiladelphia'swomenmurderersby100to1,andthesameratioofmentowomenisfoundinthePhilippines,andScotland,andDenmark,andindeedinIceland,althoughthenumberofmurdersthereissosmallthatthestatisticshardlyregister.

    Evolutionarypsychologistshavealsostudiedtheothersideofthecoin:notconflictandviolence,but sociality. Not all creatures are social but those that are clearly benefit in many ways.Commonsense,observationandallmannerof theoriesagree that sociality typically involvessomemeasureofunselfishness,andthisbydefinitionimpliesthatsocialityexactsaprice.Thevarious theories of altruism throw light on where unselfishness comes from. The lateevolutionarybiologistBillHamilton'snotionofkinselectionneatlyexplainedwhycreaturesareliabletohelptheirownkin,evenatcosttothemselves,andforanycreatureitsimmediatekinwillinevitablyformasignificantpartofitssociety.HisideasweretakenfurtherbyBobTrivers,ananthropologistatRutgersUniversityinNewJersey,toshowwhyevolutionmightalsofavourindividuals that helpothers theyarenot related to, in particular through reciprocal altruism:onehelpsanotherinthehopeandexpectationthatatsometimethefavourwillbereturned.

    Moreprogresshasbeenmadeonthebackofthesefundamentalideas.JohnMaynardSmith'sanalysesofbehaviouralstrategythroughgametheory,developedattheUniversityofSussex,areparticularlyimportant.HisworkshowsthatsocietieswhichappeartoprovidewhatJeremyBenthamsometwocenturiesagocalledthegreatesthappinessforthegreatestnumbermaynotbeevolutionarilystable.Thussocietieswhichcontainonlyaltruisticdovesareaspeacefulascanbesincenobodywill fightanyoneelse.Butalldovesocietiesare liabletobeupsetbysomemutanthawkthatswaggersinandtakeseverythingwithoutopposition.Thehawkswillthriveandmultiplyuntil therearesomany that theystartclashingwithotherhawks,which isbadnewsforthehawks.Sothehawksaremoreorlessboundtoappearamongsocietiesofdoves,buttheirownhawkishnessstopsthembecomingtoonumerous.

    Moregenerally, all societies require individuals tobehavewith somedegreeof altruism,andthatinturnmeansthattheyareallatriskfromfreeloaderswhotakethegoodiesanddonothinginreturn.Triverspredictedthatsocialcreaturesshouldbeadeptatdetectingcheatsandtakeadimviewofthem.EvolutionarypsychologistsJohnToobyandLedaCosmidesoftheUniversityof California, Santa Barbara, have tested this prediction in humans and so it turns out. Inlaboratoryteststheyshowthatpeoplefindithardtodetectviolationsofanif/thenrulelaidoutin logic but can do so easily and accurately if the violation represents cheating in a socialsituation.Theconclusionisthatourbrainshavespecificallyevolvedtospotcheating.Wehavenotsimplyevolvedageneralabilitytothinklogically.

    The other side of this coin has been explored byRobert Frank ofCornellUniversity amongothers. In his books, including The WinnerTakeAll Society, he develops the notion thathumanshaveevolvedatremendouslystrongsenseofjustice.Ontheonehandweareacutelyawareofbeingdonedownontheotherwegotogreatlengthstoestablishourreputationsasgood,honestpeople.Inthis,wegofarbeyondwhatmightseemtobenecessary:forexample,weleavetipsforwaitersinrestaurantswewillnevervisitagain,becausewecan'tstopprovingtotheworldhowreliableweare.

    Suchnotionscanbetestedindirectly.InSwitzerland,ErnstFehroftheUniversityofZurichand

  • 5/2/2015 EBSCOhost

    http://web.b.ebscohost.com.oxfordbrookes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/delivery?sid=c8fd6c7d9c6943159491e34b0cc7230d%40sessionmgr110&vid=1&hid=107 4/5

    SimonGachteroftheUniversityofStGallengavestudentsacooperativetaskoftheprisoner'sdilemma kind: all benefit if everyone plays honourably, but those who cheat benefit moreprovided they don't get found out (New Scientist, 12 January, p 11). The students wererewardedwith realmoney if they didwell and fined if they did not. Theywere also able topunishfellowplayersbyimposingfinesbutonlybypayingapenaltythemselves,sothosewhopunishedothersa lotwere liable to finishupwith lessmoney than thosewhopunishedverylittle.Surprisinglythoughperhapsnotsosurprisingtothoseversedinevolutionarypsychologythestudentstendedtopunishcheatsseverely,eventhoughtheylostoutbydoingso.Peopleseem to hate cheats somuch that they are prepared to incur significant penalties to punishthem.Again,thistendencydoesnotseemconfinedtohumansitisnotjustapartofourownspecific culturaloverlay.JenniferScottat theWesleyanUniversity inConnecticuthas foundcomparablebehaviour ingorillas.Eventhealphamales,hugeanddominantthoughtheyare,areliabletobegivenabadtimebytheirsubordinatesiftheyappeartobehaveunjustly.

    Onemore lineof thought, this timederiving fromDarwin's ideaofsexualselection,seems tosewthesedisparateobservationsintoaneatstory.Darwinproposedthenotionthatselectiondidnotactonlyoncharacteristicsthatmadecreaturesbetterabletosurvive,butalsoonthosethatmadethembetterabletoattractmates.HisideaswereneglecteduntilAmotzZahavitookthemupinthe1970stoexplorewhyanimalsdoweirdandwonderfulthingsfortheoppositesexthatarequiteuselessorevendamagingfordaytodaysurvival.Indeed,Zahaviproposedthatmatingdisplayswithfeathersandantlersandthunderousbassvoicesareimpressivepreciselybecausetheyaresocostly intimeandenergy.It isasthoughtheanimalweresaying:WhatwonderfulgenesImusthavetoabletodothisandsurvivetoo.

    GeoffreyMiller, inTheMatingMind, suggests that all the greatest achievements of humans,including fine art andmusic and the ability to do calculus and speculate onGod, began asdisplays of prowess. Oneway to stand out from the crowd is simply to be passionate, andyoungmenareparticularlypronetopassionindeed,DalyandWilsonhaveproposedthattheextremeviolencesooftenevidentinyoungmalescanbeconstruedasaformofshowingoff.

    Soaswedrawtogetherthevariousthreadsofevolutionarypsychologyitbecomeseasytoseehowyoungmen in particularwant both to display their bravery, andare deeply offendedbyinjustice,andonbothcountsmayrisktheirownliveseventothepointofcertaindeath.Whenthesepeopleareonoursidewecall themheroesandmartyrswhen theyarenot,we labelthemterrorists.

    Whatdoesall thisaddupto?Thegeneralcontributionofevolutionarypsychologysofar is tosuggestthatevenflyinganaeroplanefullofpassengersintoabuildingfullofordinarypeopleisnotbeyondhumanunderstanding.Itshouldnotbedescribedsimplyinthemystifyinglanguageof psychopathology. It wastes everybody's time simply to smother the whole event and thepeople behind it in words like wicked and evil. This is the vocabulary of desperation:expressions of intellectual and moral abdication, as if such acts must forever be beyondunderstanding, so there is nothing sensible to be done except to purge the world of theirperpetrators, with as many bombs as it takes. Once we perceive that even such extremebehaviourisinprinciplecomprehensible,andthatitisveryprobablyrootedinthedeep,human,evolvedsenseof justiceand injustice,andperpetratedbyyoungpeoplewho feeldonedownand have a yen for martyrdom, then we at least have the basis for sensible and perhaps

  • 5/2/2015 EBSCOhost

    http://web.b.ebscohost.com.oxfordbrookes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/delivery?sid=c8fd6c7d9c6943159491e34b0cc7230d%40sessionmgr110&vid=1&hid=107 5/5

    effectivestrategy.

    Ofcourse,evolutionarypsychologydoesnotprovideanallembracingtheoryofhumannature.Itisnotasoloturn,toreplaceallotherwaysoflookingatourselves.Butitshouldbeacceptedalongsideothersourcesof insight, includingpsychology,sociology,philosophy, literature.Andthe common canard of the critics, that the hypotheses of evolutionary psychology are nottestableandthereforearenotscience, issimplynottrue.Theseareonlythebeginnings,too.Evolutionarypsychologyisnotapanacea,oranalgorithm,but itsurely isasignificantstepinwhatshouldbehumanity'squestforenlightenment.

    PHOTO(COLOR)

    PHOTO(COLOR)

    PHOTO(COLOR):Wegotogreatlengthstoestablishourreputationsasgood,honestpeople

    PHOTO(COLOR):Whenthesepeopleareonoursidewecallthemheroesandmartyrs:whentheyarenot,welabelthemterrorists

    ~~~~~~~~ByColinTudge

    ColinTudge'slatestbooks,InMendel'sFootnotesandTheVarietyofLife,arenowavailableinpaperback.TheauthorisespeciallygratefultoOliverCurryattheLondonSchoolofEconomicsforhishelpinpreparingthisarticle

    2002,NewScientist,ReedBusinessInformationUK,Ltd.,adivisionofReedElsevier,Inc.AllRightsReserved.CopyrightofNewScientististhepropertyofReedBusinessInformationanditscontentmaynotbecopiedoremailedtomultiplesitesorpostedtoalistservwithoutthecopyrightholder'sexpresswrittenpermission.However, usersmayprint, download,oremailarticlesforindividualuse.