tuesday, june 19, 2007ices3, june 18-21, 2007, montreal1 the annual structural business survey...

22
Tuesday, June 19, 2 007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim Onat Rachel Visschers Statistics Netherlands Division of Business Statistics

Upload: jordan-carlson

Post on 27-Mar-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 1

The Annual Structural Business SurveyDeveloping and Testing

an Electronic Form

Ger SnijkersEvrim Onat

Rachel Visschers

Statistics NetherlandsDivision of Business Statistics

Page 2: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 2

1. Dutch Annual StructuralBusiness Survey

Annual survey of economic activity Mandatory 75.000 business each year:

• Sample of small firms, bigger firms each year Until now: paper questionnaire

• length may differ, 20 pages is typical Three parts:

• revenues and costs• summary of business accounts:

profits and losses• industry specific specifications

Page 3: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 3

2. The paper questionnaireCharacteristics

A4 booklet• Right page: items• Left page: help texts - long and voluminous

Items are grouped in sections• Long sections

• Completion process: complicated and hard• Large amount of detailed information• Broad range of business information:

several departments, several respondents• No match with definitions used, but same label:

CBS – business definitions• Lay-out: misinterpratations and errors

Page 4: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 4

Vernieuwde huisstijl:2. Onderzoek naar de PS

Q oud

Page 5: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 5

3. The web questionnaireProject goal

Develop a web questionnaire• same contents• mixed-mode design: paper and web• support completion process:

- motivate respondents to use this mode• into the field: March 2006

Start of project: June 2004

In the field: Spring 2006

Page 6: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 6

3. The web questionnaire Developing and testing

In five stages:

1. Testing the prototype (31-1-’05)• pre-tests to test usability: 3 waves

2. Revision of questionnaire (1-9-’05)• expert reviews

3. Testing of revised questionnaire (1-1-’06)• additional usability tests

4. Implementation of field pilot (1-3-’06)

5. Implementation of survey (1-3-’07)

Page 7: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 7

3.1. The web Q: The prototype

Page 8: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 8

3.1. The prototype: 3 test waves

Test 1 Test 2 Test 3

Period Aug. 2004 Oct. 2004 Nov./Dec. 2004

Form Blaise IS Blaise -EDR

Blaise -CBSquest

On/off-line On-line Off-line Off-line

Mode Browser CD-rom Downloadablevia internet

Number of interviews

15 CBS employees

37 businesses

6 businesses

Tested by CBS employees,external designer

6 business interviewers

2 cogn. lab interviewer + 2 business interviewer

Results Experiences from CBS employees

Experiences from interviewers

Experiences with respondents

Page 9: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 9

3.1. The prototypeResearch issues

1. How does the e-form work in practice?• Completing the questionnaire• Question-and-answer process

2. What features should be included to make it easy to use?• Respondent friendly: ‘Computer-assisted’ tools• User wishes

3. How should the web Q be designed in relation to the paper Q?• The same or a different design• ‘look-and-feel’ of paper and e-form

Page 10: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 10

3.1. The prototypeResearch issues

1. How does the Q work?

Laborious and complex process• Long, complex questionnaire (≥ 25 items)• Complex completion process:

- several sessions, several informants- kick-and-rush behaviour

• Imagine ... a respondent sitting behind his/her computer ...

Respondent got lost in the questionnaire

Page 11: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 11

2. Features to make it easy to use?• What am I supposed to do (next)?

• Easy to download, install, complete, send data back• It is one process: downloading – sending data back, • Clear instructions and explanations (but not read)

• How is the questionnaire built up? • Show how the questionnaire is structured: overview• Help to find the way in the questionnaire• No hidden rules, no unexpected functionalities

• Where am I? What did I do so far?• Provide overview of the completion process• Clear navigation, no scrolling• Printing function

3.1. The prototypeResearch issues

Page 12: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 12

2. Features to make it easy to use? Con’d• Printing

• Passing on sections of Q to other departments• Checking the data before transmitting• Getting authorisation to release the data

• Calculations• Well accepted, … even expected

• Entry-search• ‘Google’-like search: “Where to put these data?”

• Navigation and overview• Choose a setup people are familiar with:

- setup of tax office, windows explorer

3.1. The prototypeResearch issues

Page 13: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 13

3. Design of paper and web Q?• The computer is different than paper

• The web Q reacts to the respondent• Reading from the screen is different• Navigating and getting an overview

works differently• Kick-and-rush behaviour,

even stronger than on paper• The use of computer-assisted functionalities;

the respondent expects the computer to react

3.1. The prototypeResearch issues

Page 14: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 14

3.1. The prototypeConclusions of pre-test waves

• Visual design Clear and logical Simple, transparent, consistent No hidden and unexpected functionalities

• Support the completion process Other mode, other features, other visual design

Different than paper form, same ‘look-and-feel’

• Tailor to kick-and-rush behaviour Small sections, small tasks Short and clear explanations

Page 15: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 15

3.2. The revised questionnaire

Based on:• Pre-test results• Expert reviews

• Iterative process with- Professional designer- Questionnaire designers- Methodologists

• A user friendly design was put first, not the IT tool

• New prototypes designed in Power Point

Page 16: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 16

Page 17: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 17

3.3. The revised questionnaireConclusions of add. pre-tests

• 10 concurrent in-depth interviews• Usability and user friendliness has been

improved respondents enjoyed working with the

questionnaire they could handle the task even though … the task had not changed

Web questionnaire design is communication design

Page 18: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 18

3.4. Field pilot

Set-up:

March-July 2006 7200 businesses, 5 industries Advance letter with

• internet address: www.cbs.nl/productiestatistiek• user name and password• leaflet to introduce web questionnaire

and explain why the survey is conducted• paper questionnaire not mentioned

Page 19: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 19

Leaflet

Page 20: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 20

3.4. Field pilot

Goals: Implementation of web questionnaire

• paper and web flows

Test the whole process• downloading – completing – sending-in data• investigate completion process in the field:

- debriefing interviews with respondents- audit trails

Response rates Data quality

• data editing, mode effects

Page 21: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 21

3.5. Survey

Now running About 75.000 business received this

questionnaire

Page 22: Tuesday, June 19, 2007ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal1 The Annual Structural Business Survey Developing and Testing an Electronic Form Ger Snijkers Evrim

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 22

Web questionnaire design is communication design