tulsa’s kindergarten readiness assessment pilot project project overview & year 1-2 results
DESCRIPTION
Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results. Updated January 2013. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project
PROJECT OVERVIEW& year 1-2 results
Updated January 2013
![Page 2: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
“There’s an enormous brain drain being lost in
our country. Children under 5 are not being empowered to reach their potential and it’s a huge loss to children, their parents, their community, and our society”
--Neal Halfon, M.D., Director, UCLA Center for Healthier Children, Families & Communities
“Young children are our last chance at prevention”--Nina Sazer O’Donnell, Vice President, Education, United
Way Worldwide2
![Page 3: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Project overviewData--Early Development Instrument
implementationComplete EDI in all schools in partner districts
in 3 years (2011-3)—approximately 5,000 children
Move EDI outside Tulsa area (2012-3)Action--Using results for system improvement
Community response in selected neighborhoods (2012-3)
School-based responses
3
![Page 4: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Early Development Instrument
Developed in Canada in 1998 and expanding across US since 2009
Population-based (results for neighborhoods and schools but not individual children)
Teacher-administered (no child involvement or use of class time)
Kindergarten level (first comprehensive and comparable assessment under grade 3)
Multi-domain (not just “academics”)Evaluations show high reliability, moderate
validity, good predictive validity 4
![Page 5: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
RESULTS
5
![Page 6: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
EDI Tulsa Overall Results 3,100 children 2011-12EDI Domain All
TulsaDefinitions
Developmentally “Very Ready”
408 (14%)
75th percentile or higher on 4 or more of the 5 domains
Developmentally Vulnerable on 2 or More Domains
600 (20%)
10th percentile or lower on 2 or more of the 5 domains
Multiple Challenge Index
236 (8%)
“Not ready” on 9 or more of the 15 sub-domainsMost are included in “Developmentally Vulnerable”
6
![Page 7: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
EDI Sub-domains with High Vulnerability
EDI Domain All Tulsa Vulnerab
le
Key sub-domain issues
Physical Health and Well-Being
20% 14% not physically ready for school18% not physically independent32% not ready in motor skills
Social Competence
15% 18% not ready in approaches to learning14% not ready in responsibility and respect
Emotional Maturity
18% 32% not ready in prosocial/helping26% not ready in hyperactive and inattentive behavior21% not ready in aggressive behavior
Language and Cognitive Skills (school-based)
12% 20% not ready in interest in literacy/numeracy
Communication Skills and general knowledge
9% (no sub-domains) 7
![Page 8: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
TULSA SUBGROUP RESULTS
(2011 results only, approximately 1,500 children)
8
![Page 9: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Whether Attended Any Pre-K
Pre-K (42% of children)
No Pre-K (58%)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
14% 15%
% Very Ready
Pre-K* No Pre-K0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
17%
22%
% Vulnerable
9* Indicates significantly different from children who did not attend pre-K
![Page 10: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Whether Enrolled in CAP Age 4
Not CAP (81% of children)
CAP* (19%)0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
15%
11%
% Very Ready
Not CAP CAP*0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%21%
15%
% Vulnerable
10
*Indicates results differ significantly from children who were not in CAP at age 4.Children in CAP at 4 are also significantly less likely to have multiple challenges.
![Page 11: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
% Vulnerable by Preschool
No CAP as 3 & no
PreK as 4
No CAP as 3 & PreK as
4
CAP as 3 & PreK as 4
CAP as 3 & CAP PreK
as 4
CAP as 3 & non-CAP PreK as 4
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25% 23%
18%
14%12%
15%
% Vulnerable
11
![Page 12: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
% Developmentally Vulnerable by Domain—CAP Status
Phys
ical
Socia
l
Emotion
al
Lang
uage
Gener
al0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
CAP at Age 4 (19% of children)Not CAP at Age 4 (81%)
12
![Page 13: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
EDI Maps
13
![Page 14: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
EDI MapsShow results by where children live, not
where they go to schoolMaps that are not included in this
presentation also show domain vulnerability, socioeconomic status, community assets identified by CAP.
14
![Page 15: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
% vulnerable on 2+ domains by neighborhood, central Tulsa
15
![Page 16: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
% Vulnerable, Physical Health and Well-Being
16
![Page 17: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Next Steps
17
![Page 18: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Continue EDIsIn Tulsa
Complete 3rd year EDIs (January-March)Review results (November)
3 years combinedCan compare with other areas in state for
first timeOutside Tulsa
Expanding in north and southeast Oklahoma this school year
Expecting to expand further in 2013-14.
18
![Page 19: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Using EDI results to change systemsCommunity continues response (CAP)
Share results with school boards, city leadership, business and community groups
Use results in ongoing neighborhood efforts (Kendall-Whittier and Eugene Field)
School-based presentations and discussions Identifying community partners Identifying local areas for response
School response (districts) Review school-level and neighborhood-level results
with faculty, parents, neighborhood groups and determine next steps (with CAP assistance if desired)
19
![Page 20: Tulsa’s Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Pilot Project PROJECT OVERVIEW & year 1-2 results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/568162aa550346895dd32c1e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
For more informationPaul Shinn, Public Policy Analyst, CAP
[email protected](918)855-3638
Caleb Gayle, Advocacy and Outreach Specialist, [email protected](918)629-7039
TECCS national site (fact sheets, sample documents, evaluations, local community efforts, etc.)- http://teccs.net/
20