turning the corner? protecting innovation and investment ... · protecting innovation and...
TRANSCRIPT
1
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
11
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
2
Turning the Corner? Protecting Innovation and Investment in China’s Rapidly Evolving Business Landscape
October 27, 2009Chicago, IL
2
3
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Discuss Agenda
Patent Reform and Other Recent Developments in China’s IP Landscape – Protection, Enforcement, and Other Considerations
China’s Changing Landscape —Josh Timberlake, Deloitte Consulting
LLP
Discussions about Chinese Tax Issues —Sarah Winters, Deloitte Tax LLP
Strengthening a Company’s Business and IP Assets in China Through Effective Agreements with Employees, Internal Controls and Favorable Governmental Policies —Ken Duck, Foley & Lardner LLP
Changing China: Current Trends in China’s IP Landscape —Jon Dudas, Foley & Lardner LLP
Enforcing Intellectual Property in China —Catherine Sun, Foley & Lardner LLP
Intellectual Property Considerations for Companies Doing Business in ChinaJ. Bruce Schelkopf, Cummins Inc.
Strengthening a Company’s Business and IP Assets Under China’s Current Regulatory Environment
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
4
Patent Reform and Other Recent Developments in China’s IP
Landscape – Protection, Enforcement, and Other Considerations
3
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
5
Changing China: Current Trends in China’s IP Landscape
Jon Dudas, PartnerFoley & Lardner LLP
6
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
China and the IP Dichotomy
China receives more patent applications than any other nation and is the third largest recipient of utility (invention) applications.China has the most trademark filings of any nation.China was the source of 81% of the total value of counterfeit goods seized by US Customs in 2008. IPR seizures of goods from China rose 40% by value in FY 2008.
4
7
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Brief History of IP in China
1980--Patent Office created1982--Trademark Office created1985--Copyright Office createdDecember 2001—China joins the WTO and signs the TRIPS agreementJune 2008--Publication of the National Intellectual Property Strategy
8
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Shifting Attitude in China
2001-2004Focus on laws, less than robust enforcementDefensive international postureTension within the government agencies in China
2004-2007More attention paid to enforcementUS files a WTO case against China
2007-PresentFocus on Innovation in ChinaMove from “Made in China” to “Invented in China”National Intellectual Property Strategy is Adopted
5
9
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
National IP Strategy
Goal: China to become a world leader in innovation by 2020Coordination: 33 Departments in the Chinese Government were involved in the negotiation of the StrategyArchitects: Vice Minister Wu Yi (retired) and Tian Lipu, Commissioner of the State Intellectual Property Office
10
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
China-US Cooperation
IP is addressed at the highest political levels and working levels—President, Premier, Vice Premiers, Ministers, Vice Ministers and Directors—in diverse agencies
October 2008—Memoranda of Understanding Signed between the USPTO and SIPO (patents), SAIC (trademarks) and GAPP (copyrights)
6
11
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
China-US Cooperation(continued)
China is a full participant of the IP5—5 largest patent offices in the worldChina is an observer in the Trademark Trilateral Meetings among the US, Japan and EuropeAnnual US-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade (Ministerial Level) progresses
12
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
US Resources in China
US Patent and Trademark Office/Foreign Commercial Service IP AttachesMarket Access Compliance OfficersUS EmbassyUnited States Trade Representative
7
13
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Resources in the United States
STOP Hotline—1-866-999-HALT; www.stopfakes.gov
US Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator (“IP Czar”)
US Patent and Trademark Office
US Trade Representative
14
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
China IP Strategies
File strategically, but file for IP in ChinaThere is no enforcement of IP rights without IP, a problem for companies large and small
Strategically determine whether and where to manufacture in ChinaUtilize US government resourcesHave counsel in ChinaFamiliarity and presence in China is critical
Know and visit regularly with key national and provincial Chinese government officials
8
15
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Questions & Answers
Jon DudasPartnerFoley & Lardner LLPWashington Harbour3000 K Street NWSuite 600Washington, DC Phone: 202.945.6107 Email: [email protected]
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
16
Enforcing Intellectual Property in China
Catherine Sun, Managing PartnerFoley & Lardner LLP
9
17
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Dynamics of IP Legislation in China
Brief History of 27 years-PRC Trademark law took effect on March 1, 1983Joined World Trade Organization in 2001
Eight years of Accession
Third Amendment to the Patent Law effective on October 1, 2009Third Amendment to the Trademark Law is pending
18
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Enforcing Patents under the Third Amendment: Reality and Prediction
Increased maximum statutory damagesInvalidate a patent in suit based on absolute noveltyChallenge the enforceability of the patent in suit based on failure to comply with confidentiality review requirementInfringement defense based on practicing of prior artHarder to obtain pre-suit preliminary injunction
10
19
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Chint v. SchneiderA Chinese Company Suing A French Companyfor Patent Infringement
Forum shopping - Wenzhou Intermediate Court as the trial courtPatent at issue – a Chinese utility model patent expired in November 2007Damages – trial count rendered RMB 334 million in damagesIn April 2009, case settled for RMB 157.5 million, the largest settlement in Chinese patent litigation history
20
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
How to Enforce IP in China?
NegotiationMediationArbitration
Face saving (mianzi) still dictates resolution of disputes by non-court actions
Administrative ActionsCivil actionsCriminal actions
Criminal actions mostly are applicable to trademark and copyright offenses
11
21
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Administrative Enforcement
Agency for Industry and Commerce (AIC) and Technology Supervision Bureau (TSB)
Suitable for trademark and simple design patent infringement only
Quicker & Cheaper
Evidence collection tool
No damages
22
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Civil Court Actions vs. Administrative Actions
Specialized IP courtsSuitable for copyright & complex patent casesRemedies include damages, injunction, and public & private apologyUnique characteristics:
rocket docketvery little discoverydamages are historically not high
12
23
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
How to Resolve IP Dispute in China - Final Thoughts
Avoid litigation if possible
Do allocate decent budget in China IP protection
Carefully manage litigation expectation and exposure
24
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Questions & Answers
Catherine SunShanghai Managing PartnerFoley & Lardner LLPSuite 2201, Jinmao Tower88 Century BoulevardShanghai 200121, ChinaPhone: 86.21.61008900Email: [email protected]
13
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
25
Intellectual Property Considerations for Companies Doing Business in
China
J. Bruce Schelkopf, Esq.Chief Patent & IP Counsel
Cummins Inc.
26
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Overview: Doing Business in China
Cummins’ business experience in ChinaPresence in China for 37 years Partnering with Chinese companiesChanges in landscape of technology industryShift in attitudes of Chinese manufacturers and technology ownersContinued challenges with doing business in China
14
27
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Understanding Cultural, Social, and Legal Issues in China
China is transitioning from a manufacturing society to a knowledge society
Technology is increasingly valued
Knowledge is becoming a commodity
Adapt to and adopt cultural indices
U.S. companies benefit by sharing, teaching, and educating Chinese business partners
28
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Strategy For Identifying & Preventing Counterfeit Goods
Identifying counterfeit goods
Marking authentic products
“On the ground” assessment/investigation
Educating employees/business partners
Process and procedures
15
29
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Strategy For Identifying & Preventing Counterfeit Goods
Partnering with Chinese Officials
Notify and investigate suspected counterfeit
goods
AIC Officials in Chinese provinces
30
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Counterfeit Goods Strategy (continued)
When counterfeit goods are identified. . .
Confiscate? Purchase? Destroy?
Penalties for counterfeit activity
Examples of counterfeit goods that Cummins has dealt with in China
16
31
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Counterfeit Goods Strategy (continued)
Ceremony & Publication
Highlight successes; create incentives
Benefits government officials, Chinese business partners, and Chinese provinces
32
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Strategies For Protecting and Enforcing IP In China
Role of Chinese manufacturers in driving enforcementConcerns with “blocking” access to Chinese suppliersWorking with Chinese business partnersWorking with local officials
17
33
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Patent Considerations & Filing Strategy
Resource Allocation – China or United States?Utility Model or Invention Patent?Where to File Priority Application?Design Patent ProtectionDefensive Patents
34
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Patent Considerations & Filing Strategy
Patent protection in ChinaBy 2013-2014: Issuances of Chinese patents will exceed the number of issued U.S. patentsLegal & practical implications for U.S. companies in China
18
35
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Opportunities in China BasedOn The Third Amendment
Effective October 1, 2009Changes to Patentability Standards
“Absolute novelty”
Patent Enforcement ConsiderationsAdditional administrative powersIncreased penalties availableEvidence preservationPrior art defense
36
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Third Amendment (continued)
Joint Ownership Issues
Joint development concerns
Collaborating with Chinese business partnersAvoid holding your Chinese supplier “hostage”
Considerations for written agreementsCultural & social issues
19
37
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Third Amendment (continued)
Compulsory License IssuesInfringement Damages
Statutory damage ceiling increasedIncreased penalties for counterfeiting
Content Review SystemFile first outside China after content reviewApplicability to foreign enterprises?
38
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Third Amendment (continued)
Inventor CompensationApplicability to foreign enterprisesPolicy or agreement can override
Design Patent ApplicationsMultiple embodiments in single applicationNo source identifiers
20
39
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
J. Bruce SchelkopfChief Patent & IP CounselCummins Inc.One American Square, Suite 1800 Indianapolis, IN 46282Phone: 317.610.2462Email:[email protected]
Questions & Answers
40
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Discuss Agenda
Patent Reform and Other Recent Developments in China’s IP Landscape – Protection, Enforcement, and Other Considerations
China’s Changing Landscape —Josh Timberlake, Deloitte
Discussions about Chinese Tax Issues —Sarah Winters, Deloitte
Strengthening a Company’s Business and IP Assets in China Through Effective Agreements with Employees, Internal Controls and Favorable Governmental Policies —Ken Duck, Foley & Lardner
Changing China: Current Trends in China’s IP Landscape —Jon Dudas, Foley & Lardner
Enforcing Intellectual Property in China —Catherine Sun, Foley & Lardner
Intellectual Property Considerations for Companies Doing Business in ChinaJ. Bruce Schelkopf, Cummins Inc.
Strengthening a Company’s Business and IP Assets Under China’s Current Regulatory Environment
21
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
41
Strengthening a Company’s Business and IP Assets Under
China’s Current Regulatory Environment
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
42
China’s Changing Landscape
Josh Timberlake, Senior ManagerDeloitte Consulting LLP
22
43
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Before and After
Pudong - 1987 Pudong - 2007
44
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Why Offshore to China?
Linear Deployment Model
Customers R&D
Engineer
Sourcing
Production
Assembly
Dist’n
Reve
nue Talent
Cost
Market Builders•Target new customers
and revenue sources•Based on GDP growth,
market deregulation, trade alliances, etc.
Talent Seekers•Target locations that
offer depth of talent•Based on access to
universities, research institutions, IP protection, etc.
Cost Cutters•Pursue low-cost inputs to product or process•Low-cost inputs may include labor, utilities, raw materials, etc.
Past
Pres
ent
Futu
re
CostCutters
MarketBuilders Talent
Seekers
23
45
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Cost Cutters – on the move
China’s cost advantage has eroded substantially
Rapid cost escalation (Labor, Real Estate, etc.)Changing Tax environmentTransition to single CIT rate – 25%Declining / evolving incentivesCost cutters moving to interior, if not out of China
Shanghai Urban Average Wage
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Shanghai urban average wage (RMB/Yr)
Data: China Statistical Yearbook
Source: Shanghai Statistical Yearbook
46
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Cost Cutters – increasing competition
Foreign Direct Investment Trends in Traditional “Cost Cutter” Industries (2003 – 2008)
Data from fDi Intelligence by Financial Times. Includes announcements of planned capital investment in Electronic Components, Consumer Electronics,
Consumer Products, and Textiles sectors.
24
47
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Market Builders – a growing wave
Increasing attractiveness of China’s consumer market
Rising disposable income levelsProduct localization (encouraged / incented for certain industries)Improving transportation networkCoastal vs. interior income disparity remains
Disposable Income
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
urban disposable income ‐ national average(RMB/Yr)
Source: China Statistical Yearbook
48
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Talent Seekers – the pool deepens
Source: IMD World Competitiveness Report; Deloitte research
Annual R&D Expenditures
05,000
10,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,00040,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
US $
M
China (Mainland) India Mexico Poland Vietnam
China’s domestic talent pool is growing increasingly competitive
Demographics – huge talent poolImproving skills – engineers, scientists, technicians, etc.Graduate repatriationPolicy-backed targeting of R&D and IP-intensive projectsIncentives
High & New Technology Enterprise
5.1 million students graduated from higher education in 2007Over 40% science or engineering majorsTechnical/vocational school enrollment doubled from 1997-2007 to roughly 20 million
25
49
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
A Changing Tide
Convergence Model
CostCutters
MarketBuilders
TalentSeekers
Customers R&D
Engineer
Sourcing
Production
Assembly
Dist’n
Reve
nue Talent
Cost
Market Builders•Target new customers and
revenue sources•Based on GDP growth,
market deregulation, trade alliances, etc.
Talent Seekers•Target locations that offer
depth of talent•Based on access to
universities, research institutions, IP protection, etc.
Cost Cutters•Pursue low-cost inputs to product or process•Low-cost inputs may include labor, utilities, raw materials, etc.
•Companies increasingly trying to balance multiple deployment objectives
•China is one of the few global locations which balances all three
50
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Questions & Answers
Josh TimberlakeSenior ManagerDeloitte Consulting LLPPhone: 312.486.3067Email: [email protected]
26
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
51
Discussions about Chinese Tax Issues
Sarah Winters, International Tax DirectorDeloitte Tax LLP
52
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Contents
Overview of Chinese Tax System
Enterprise Income Tax
Turnover Tax
- Value Added Tax
- Business Tax
27
53
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Overview of Chinese Tax System
54
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Overview of Chinese Tax System
Income Tax
Enterprise
Resident Enterprises ( 25% beginning in 2008)
Nonresident Enterprises
Income connected to China establishment (25% beginning in 2008)
Income not connected to China establishment (withholding taxes)
Individual (5% - 45%)
Turnover Tax
Value Added Tax (0%-17%)
Business Tax (3%-20%)
Consumption Tax (5%-45%)
Other Major TaxesCustoms Duty
Stamp Duty (0.003% - 0.1%)
Land Value Appreciation Tax (30% - 60%)
28
55
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Enterprise Income Tax
56
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Tax Incentives under the New Chinese Enterprise Income Tax Law
China’s tax incentives moved from predominately manufacturing based and location oriented to high technology, R&D, and environmental incentives. The following are a few key incentives available under the new tax system:1. High and New Technology Enterprises2. R&D Super Deduction3. Technologically Advanced Service Enterprise4. Various incentives for certain industries specifically encouraged by
government, such as software and integrated circuitry, environmental protection, etc.
Under current economy situation, certain local authorities have provided subsidy to enterprises (modeled after incentives)
29
57
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
High and New Technology Enterprises
Entitled to 15% income tax rateMajor requirements:i. Has been established in China for more than one yearii. Products / Service within the scope of the Catalogueiii. Intellectual Property (“IP”)
Enterprise has obtained the IP right of core technology in the last 3 years through self-R&D activities, transfer/purchase, donation, merger etc.; orEnterprise to secure exclusive right to use IP for period of at least 5 years
58
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
High and New Technology Enterprises
iv. Headcount of technical staff with university degree or above to be 30% or more of total headcount of enterprise, of which 10% or more R&D staff
v. R&D expenditure for the recent 3 years should reach a prescribed percentage of the total revenue
vi. The amount of R&D expenditure incurred within China should not be less than 60% of the total R&D expenditure
vii. Income from high & new tech products / services should be >60% of the total annual income
30
59
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
R&D Super Deduction
150% deduction for eligible R&D expenses; or 150% tax basis for eligible R&D expenses that have been capitalizedNo IP ownership is requiredR&D activities include:
Those activities listed in the ‘State encouraged high-new technology areas’ and the ‘Guideline of the latest key priority development areas in the high tech industry’, orActivities carried on continuously with a clear objective to obtain new knowledge of science and technology; or to substantially improve technology, production techniques or products
60
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
R&D Super Deduction
R&D expenses include:Those direct expenses that can be specifically allocated to the R&D activitiesIf activities carried out by a third party, the consignor/principal is entitled to claim the super deductionIf activities are carried out by multiple enterprises, each member will share the costs they specifically incurred
31
61
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Technologically Advanced Service Enterprise
Qualified Technologically Advanced Service Enterprise (TASE) in 20 pilot cities are entitled with major preferential tax benefits as follows:
15% income tax rate Limit of deductible education expenses is increased to 8% of the total salary; the excess amount can be carried forward to future yearsOffshore outsourcing service income exempted from business tax Pilot cities include Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Chongqing, Dalian, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Wuhan, Haerbin, Chengdu, Nanjing, Xi’An, Jinan, Hangzhou, Hefei, Nanchang, Changsha, Daqing, Suzhou, WuxiTentatively from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013
62
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Technologically Advanced Service Enterprise
Scope of technologically advanced servicesInformation Technology Outsourcing (ITO) including software development, system hosting, system maintenance, IT development, etc.Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) including design of operational flows, business internal control, business operations management, supply chain management, etc.Knowledge Processing Outsourcing (KPO) services
32
63
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Technologically Advanced Service Enterprise
Qualification of TASE1. Engaged in one or more of the technologically advanced
outsourcing services2. Registered and operating in one of the 20 specified pilot
cities3. Being a legal entity in good standing for two years with
respect to all business administrative requirements including import, export, finance, taxation, foreign exchange, customs, etc.; and are using advanced technology or has strong R&D capabilities
4. More than 50% of total employees should have an Associate degree or higher
64
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Technologically Advanced Service Enterprise
Qualification of TASE (cont)
5. More than 70% of total annual income is from technologically advanced outsourcing services
6. Possesses international qualifications including the capability maturity model (CMM), CMM integration, IT service management standard, information security standard, control environment of service organization, ISO family of standards, people CMM, etc.; and enters into outsourcing contracts with overseas customers which represents 50% or more of its annual income
33
65
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Other Technology Related Tax Incentives
Holidays restored in six zones (Circular [2007] #40)“High and New-Tech Enterprises” established on or after January 1, 2008 in the five Special Economic Zones (SEZs) and Pudong New District in Shanghai can enjoy a 2-year EIT exemption followed by 3-years one-half of the statutory EIT rate (the “2-year EIT Exemption and 3-year 50% EIT Reduction”)The EIT exemption starts from the first revenue generating year
66
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Other Technology Related Tax Incentives
SEZs refer to Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Shantou, Xiamen and HainanThe high-tech status will be determined based on new EIT rules (ownership of core IP is required)Companies with branch operations outside of SEZsand Pudong New District have to clearly segregate their revenues within/outside of SEZs/Pudong New District, or will be denied the tax rate reductions
34
67
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Other Technology Related Tax Incentives
Software production enterprisesNewly set up qualified enterprises: “2+3” tax holiday
1st & 2nd years : exempt3rd to 5th years : half of the standard tax rate i.e. 12.5%
Existing qualified enterprises: reduced taxrate @10%
68
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Transfer Pricing Documentation Requirement
Starting from 01/01/08, all enterprises are required to prepare and maintain contemporaneous transfer pricing documentation, with the following three exceptions:
Safe Harbor Exception – related party buy/sell transactions < RMB 200 million (toll processing amount calculated based on declared import & export value to Customs) and other related party transactions < RMB 40 million (excluding amounts covered in CSA or APA) *Domestic Transaction Exception - Foreign shareholding of enterprise < 50% AND only domestic transactions (HK, Taiwan & Macao are non-domestic)APA Exception – Transactions covered under an APA
35
69
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Transfer Pricing Documentation Requirement
Shall be completed by May 31 of the following year and must be submitted within 20 days upon tax bureau’s request; Year 2008 documentation - extended to 12/31/09Documentation must be in Chinese and maintained for 10 yearsPer Circular GuoShuiHan [2009] No.363 "Circular of the State Administration of Taxation on Strengthening Supervision and Investigation of Cross-Border Related Party Transactions” recently released by the SAT, the Sale Harbor Exceptions above does not apply to single functioned enterprises incur losses
70
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Turnover Taxes
36
71
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Value Added Tax Reform
The changes in Value Added Tax (VAT) regulations came into effect on 1/1/2009
Transition from a production to consumption based VAT - Recovery of VAT incurred on fixed assets, such as machinery and equipment excluding yachts, motorcycles and motor vehiclesReduction of the VAT rate for small-scale taxpayers to a uniform 3%
72
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Value Added Tax Reform
Reduction of the threshold of VAT small-scaled taxpayers, from the current annual sales value of RMB 1 million (for the manufacturing companies) and RMB 1.8 million (for the trading companies) to RMB 0.5 million and RMB 0.8 million, respectivelyRemoval of the VAT exemption for equipment imported for processing, assembly or compensation tradeExtend deadlines of VAT returns from 10 days to 15 daysDifferent VAT treatments on sale of used goods/ fixed assetsSignificant number of VAT refund rate increases
37
73
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Relevant Value Added Tax Incentive
General VAT taxpayers sell the self-developed and self-produced software products, which is taxed at the rate of 17%, may enjoythe simultaneous levy and refund policy to ensure the actual VAT burdens not exceeding 3% during the period from June 24, 2000 to the end of 2010
For the general VAT payers, which sell self-developed and self-produced embedded software together with the computer network, computer hardware, machinery and equipment, etc. , if they could clearly separate the account and records of sales of the embedded software, computer hardware, machinery and equipment, etc., the sales of embedded software may also apply for the preferential VAT treatment above
74
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Business Tax Reform
Effective from 1/1/2009, change the Business Tax (BT) levying principle from where the service is performed to where the entity receiving or providing the service is located. BT would be imposed on services income if either the service provider or the servicerecipient is located in China, regardless of where the services are rendered.
38
75
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Business Tax Update
As per the circular Caishui [2009] No.112, a grandfather rule has been granted the BT tax exposure on services provided out of China
Before 31 December 2009, or when the services end, whichever is the earlier, no BT is due for services rendered under cross-year contracts when the service is provided overseas while the service recipient is located in ChinaAny overpaid BT prior to the release of this Notice can be offset against the BT payable amount in a later filing period or can be refunded to the taxpayer
76
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Relevant Business Tax Incentive
The income derived from the operations of technology transfers, technology development and the related technology consultation, and technology services offered by units or individuals (including enterprises with foreign investment, research and development centers invested in and established by foreign businesses, foreign enterprises, and foreign individuals) is exempt from the business tax
BT exemption for offshore outsourcing service income by the qualified TASE
39
77
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Questions & Answers
Sarah WintersInternational Tax DirectorDeloitte Tax LLP Phone: 313.396.3305Email: [email protected]
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
78
Strengthening a Company’s Business and IP Assets in China Through
Effective Agreements with Employees, Internal Controls and Favorable
Governmental Policies Ken Duck, Senior Counsel
Foley & Lardner LLP
40
79
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Need for Internal Controls to Protect IP
Until now, much emphasis placed on protecting external IP misappropriation/theftRelative shortage of experienced skilled labor has resulted in sharp salary increases and retention strugglesWith more R&D underway in China among FIEs, comes an increased need for internal IP protection
80
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
What Strategies Can Be Used?
Compartmentalize the manufacturing/R&D processHold technical staff to NDAsBind technical staff and senior managers with non-competesUse liquidated damage clauses
41
81
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Compartmentalization of Manufacturing Process
Merits:No single person has access to all facets of proprietary technology processRequires reverse-engineering to be a conspiracy, not just actions of a single employeeRelatively low labor cost in China may offset inherent inefficiencies of this approach
82
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Compartmentalization of Manufacturing Process
Demerits:Likely results in inefficiencies in manufacturing processLikely results in increased labor costsMay unintentionally stifle innovation
42
83
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Non-Disclosure Agreements
NDAs are permitted to be used to protect confidential information from unauthorized disclosure during and following termination of employmentAlthough initially difficult for employers to prevail in labor arbitration, trend now is increasingly favoring employer
84
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Non-Competes (1)
Historically used for employees with access to competitively harmful informationWas not codified in PRC law until passage of Labor Contract Law (effective 1/1/08)Non-competes may be used in labor contracts for up to a maximum of 2 years May only be enforced against senior management and technical personnel
43
85
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Non-Competes (2)
Special compensation must be paidLCL silent on calculation of amount of considerationCalculation still left up to local implementing regulations, many of which are also silentGood rule of thumb: in the absence of specific local rules, 4-6 months’ salary for each year of non-compete term
86
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Liquidated Damage Clauses
The LCL authorizes employers to include liquidated damage clauses in labor contracts for employee training expensesMeant to punish employees that leave soon after receiving special training (overseas, academic, etc.)Employers might consider special training (and such damage clauses) for technical staff as incentive to remain employed
44
87
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Drafting Effective and Enforceable Contracts
Contract Law Interpretation of May 13, 2009 by the Supreme People’s Court
Article 4 of the Interpretation says courts should consider the place of signing agreed by the parties as the place of signing in a legal sense, even if actually signed elsewhereSignificant because the place of signing generally determines which court has jurisdiction as well as the governing law of the contract – prior practice was to actually have clients travel to the desired (neutral) place to have the signing ceremony
88
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Drafting Effective and Enforceable Contracts (2)
SPC Contract Law InterpretationVariation in the quality and sophistication of judges from locality to locality in China can be dramaticIntent of the Interpretation is to have the parties to contracts be free to create jurisdiction based on where they want to litigateThis is likely to lead to wide spread forum shopping, which is common in the U.S.
45
89
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Drafting Effective and Enforceable Contracts (3)
SPC Contract Law InterpretationA contract can be found to exist through the course of dealings between the partiesIf a party includes in a contract a standard disclaimer language excluding or limiting the party’s liabilities, the disclaimer must be highlighted through the use of font, symbols and other means, and at the request of the other party, the party including such disclaimer must explain the meaning of the disclaimer
90
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Drafting Effective and Enforceable Contracts (4)
July 7, 2009 SPC Opinion acknowledges the significance of the economic downturn on existing commercial/contractual relationships
(Change of Circumstances) Clarifies distinction between mere “commercial risks” inherent in business and a genuine material change of circumstance, which is unforeseeable and not inherent in the market system(Liquidated Damage Clauses) Courts have ability to reduce “excessive” damage clauses, and the Opinion sets out clear principle that damages clauses are “excessive”where more than 30% higher than the actual loss
46
91
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
R&D and Technology Investments in China
Changes to the Foreign Investment Industry Catalogue (effective 12/1/07)
Upgrade China’s industrial structure by encouraging investment projects that use new and high technologies and new materials;Reduce support for investment in the manufacturing sector using traditional technologies; andEnhance resource conservation.
92
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
R&D and Technology Investments in China
“Encouraged” industries now include:Energy (power generation, grid construction and clean energy)Bio-techsElectricityAerospace (airports and satellites)Chemical (especially supporting aerospace, IT and environmental)Pharmaceutical and healthcare
47
93
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
R&D and Technology Investments in China (Local Measures)
Formation of Onshore VC FundsOnly local level approval needed now (below US$100 million)Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangdong and Tianjin have enacted local rules to support the formation of onshore fundsThese incentives include relaxed formation procedures, tax holidays (for the funds and high level management), cash bonuses on establishment and lower capital requirements
94
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
R&D and Technology Investments in China (Local Measures)
Government matching funds available for co-investment
Depends on fund’s focus, location of the fund in China (what investment zone, etc.) and negotiations with local funding sourcesExamples include Suzhou, Huzhou, and Zhengzhou
48
95
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Questions & Answers
Ken DuckSenior CounselFoley & Lardner LLPOne Detroit Center 500Woodward Avenue Suite 2700Detroit, MI 48226-3489Phone: 313. 234.7121Email: [email protected]
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
9696