turning up the heat

3
TURNING UP THE HEAT Intertidal environments are highly variable with respect to temperature due to tidal cycles and the vertical elevation influencing the period of emer- sion, and thus rocky intertidal organisms generally have broad temperature tolerances. Many popula- tions of intertidal organisms, however, may already experience their physiological limits under current- day temperature profiles (Stillman and Somero 2000, Nguyen et al. 2011). Such species are likely to be highly sensitive to further increases in sea and air temperatures, increases in extreme temperature events, and changes to variability in temperature (Hawkins et al. 2008, Lima and Wethey 2012). Increasing evidence (but see Poloczanska et al. 2011) indicates that species range shifts are already occurring in response to increased sea-surface tem- perature with poleward expansions and contractions at their equatorial limits (Millar 2007, Ling et al. 2009b, Pitt et al. 2010, Johnson et al. 2011, Last et al. 2011, Wernberg et al. 2011a). Amongst affected species, macroalgae are particularly suscep- tible (Millar 2007, Johnson et al. 2011, Poloczanska et al. 2011, Wernberg et al. 2011a) due to (1) the lack of potential reef habitat to retreat to on some coastlines, (2) the apparently poor dispersal capacity of many macroalgae (Santelices 1990, Bellgrove et al. 2004, Coleman et al. 2009, 2011), and (3) the autogenic engineering role (Jones et al. 1994) of many vulnerable macroalgal species (Schiel 2006, Schiel 2011, Wernberg et al. 2011b). Elevated water temperatures pose a significant threat to both mac- roalgae and their associated species of intertidal and shallow subtidal reefs (Schiel et al. 2004, Wern- berg et al. 2011a), with likelihood of local and glo- bal extinctions and the inevitable loss of biodiversity. In this issue, Clark et al. “Potential for adaptation in response to thermal stress in an intertidal macro- alga” remind us that, although recent reviews have called for examination of the influence of genotype on environmental tolerance (Hoffmann and Sgro 2011, Pandolfi et al. 2011), such studies are rare in marine systems, and nonexistent for macroalgae. Clark et al. used genetic breeding design experi- ments to assess whether there was genetic variation in thermal sensitivity between two populations of a habitat-forming intertidal fucoid, Hormosira banksii. They demonstrated how thermal reaction patterns (plots of performance vs. temperature for each genotype; Fig. 1) can be used to illustrate geno- typeenvironment interactions in developing algal embryos (as proposed for terrestrial insects by King- solver et al. 2004) and thereby identify the potential susceptibility of populations to climate change. The influence of genotype on environmental tolerance and the potential for adaptation to environmental stress has not previously been examined for marine algae, but, as this study showed, may be important. Fucoid algae are conspicuous habitat-formers on temperate intertidal reefs globally (Fig. 2a), and at least some of these species have been demonstrated to act as autogenic engineers (Jenkins et al. 1999, Jenkins et al. 2004, Schiel 2006, Lilley and Schiel 2006). There is evidence from south-eastern Austra- lia that extreme temperature events can cause sun- burn (Fig. 2b) and significant canopy loss of the intertidal fucoid, Hormosira banksii, and associated changes to mid-shore communities (Keough and Quinn 1998). Changes to the distribution and abun- dance of autogenic engineers, such as H. banksii in the intertidal (and various laminarian and fucoid species in the shallow subtidal), can have cascading and long-lasting effects on the structure, diversity, and resilience of associated communities (Jenkins et al. 2004, Schiel 2006, 2011, Johnson et al. 2011, Schiel and Lilley 2011, Wernberg et al. 2011a). Understanding the connectivity, genetic diversity, and differences in temperature tolerance (Wern- berg et al. 2011b) of important intertidal and sub- tidal habitat-forming species, in the context of their broader geographical distributions, will be impor- tant for assessing the capacity of these species (and their associated communities) to adapt to future air and sea temperature profiles. Projected sea-surface temperature changes will not happen in isolation. It is the cumulative effects from a range of interacting processes that will have the greatest impacts on existing ecosystems, but will also be hardest to predict (Russell et al. 2009, Russell et al. 2012). For example, the effects of J. Phycol. 49, 627–629 (2013) © 2013 Phycological Society of America DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12088 627

Upload: alecia

Post on 28-Mar-2017

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Turning up the heat

TURNING UP THE HEAT

Intertidal environments are highly variable withrespect to temperature due to tidal cycles and thevertical elevation influencing the period of emer-sion, and thus rocky intertidal organisms generallyhave broad temperature tolerances. Many popula-tions of intertidal organisms, however, may alreadyexperience their physiological limits under current-day temperature profiles (Stillman and Somero2000, Nguyen et al. 2011). Such species are likely tobe highly sensitive to further increases in sea andair temperatures, increases in extreme temperatureevents, and changes to variability in temperature(Hawkins et al. 2008, Lima and Wethey 2012).

Increasing evidence (but see Poloczanska et al.2011) indicates that species range shifts are alreadyoccurring in response to increased sea-surface tem-perature with poleward expansions and contractionsat their equatorial limits (Millar 2007, Ling et al.2009b, Pitt et al. 2010, Johnson et al. 2011, Lastet al. 2011, Wernberg et al. 2011a). Amongstaffected species, macroalgae are particularly suscep-tible (Millar 2007, Johnson et al. 2011, Poloczanskaet al. 2011, Wernberg et al. 2011a) due to (1) thelack of potential reef habitat to retreat to on somecoastlines, (2) the apparently poor dispersal capacityof many macroalgae (Santelices 1990, Bellgroveet al. 2004, Coleman et al. 2009, 2011), and (3) theautogenic engineering role (Jones et al. 1994) ofmany vulnerable macroalgal species (Schiel 2006,Schiel 2011, Wernberg et al. 2011b). Elevated watertemperatures pose a significant threat to both mac-roalgae and their associated species of intertidaland shallow subtidal reefs (Schiel et al. 2004, Wern-berg et al. 2011a), with likelihood of local and glo-bal extinctions and the inevitable loss ofbiodiversity.

In this issue, Clark et al. “Potential for adaptationin response to thermal stress in an intertidal macro-alga” remind us that, although recent reviews havecalled for examination of the influence of genotypeon environmental tolerance (Hoffmann and Sgro2011, Pandolfi et al. 2011), such studies are rare inmarine systems, and nonexistent for macroalgae.Clark et al. used genetic breeding design experi-ments to assess whether there was genetic variation

in thermal sensitivity between two populations of ahabitat-forming intertidal fucoid, Hormosira banksii.They demonstrated how thermal reaction patterns(plots of performance vs. temperature for eachgenotype; Fig. 1) can be used to illustrate geno-type–environment interactions in developing algalembryos (as proposed for terrestrial insects by King-solver et al. 2004) and thereby identify the potentialsusceptibility of populations to climate change. Theinfluence of genotype on environmental toleranceand the potential for adaptation to environmentalstress has not previously been examined for marinealgae, but, as this study showed, may be important.Fucoid algae are conspicuous habitat-formers on

temperate intertidal reefs globally (Fig. 2a), and atleast some of these species have been demonstratedto act as autogenic engineers (Jenkins et al. 1999,Jenkins et al. 2004, Schiel 2006, Lilley and Schiel2006). There is evidence from south-eastern Austra-lia that extreme temperature events can cause sun-burn (Fig. 2b) and significant canopy loss of theintertidal fucoid, Hormosira banksii, and associatedchanges to mid-shore communities (Keough andQuinn 1998). Changes to the distribution and abun-dance of autogenic engineers, such as H. banksii inthe intertidal (and various laminarian and fucoidspecies in the shallow subtidal), can have cascadingand long-lasting effects on the structure, diversity,and resilience of associated communities (Jenkinset al. 2004, Schiel 2006, 2011, Johnson et al. 2011,Schiel and Lilley 2011, Wernberg et al. 2011a).Understanding the connectivity, genetic diversity,and differences in temperature tolerance (Wern-berg et al. 2011b) of important intertidal and sub-tidal habitat-forming species, in the context of theirbroader geographical distributions, will be impor-tant for assessing the capacity of these species (andtheir associated communities) to adapt to future airand sea temperature profiles.Projected sea-surface temperature changes will

not happen in isolation. It is the cumulative effectsfrom a range of interacting processes that will havethe greatest impacts on existing ecosystems, but willalso be hardest to predict (Russell et al. 2009,Russell et al. 2012). For example, the effects of

J. Phycol. 49, 627–629 (2013)© 2013 Phycological Society of AmericaDOI: 10.1111/jpy.12088

627

Page 2: Turning up the heat

temperature on the physiology of organisms willaffect their responses to extreme events such asstorms, which might include storm surges, floodingand increased turbidity, large run-off events withassociated water quality changes as well as physicaldisturbance caused by increased wave action. Fur-thermore, the ability to recover or recolonize anarea following the combined effects of climate-related events might depend on the delivery ofpropagules by the prevailing currents, nutrient avail-ability that might be impacted by changes to upwell-ing regimes, and the effects of ocean acidificationon early life stages of available organisms (Fabryet al. 2008). Climate-driven changes also need to beconsidered in the context of other anthropogenic

stressors and influences, such as overfishing (Linget al. 2009a), invasive species, pollution (Bellgroveet al. 1997, Brown et al. 2000), urbanization, andengineered coastlines (Airoldi et al. 2005). Thepotential synergies amongst such multiple stressorsare only just beginning to be examined. Clark et al.(2013) demonstrated that consideration must begiven to the within- and between-population geneticvariations specifically to individual and multiplestressors, in addition to understanding the averageeffects of given stressors in isolation and combina-tion. Macroalgae with easily manipulated gametes(such as fucoids) provide good model systems totest these ideas, as may cultures of microalgal spe-cies with short generation times. Moreover, theimportance of habitat-forming macroalgae for mar-ine biodiversity and the role of marine algae in theglobal carbon cycle highlight the need for a greaterunderstanding of the factors influencing their sensi-tivity and adaptability to environmental and anthro-pogenic stress.

ALECIA BELLGROVE

Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life &Environmental Sciences, Deakin University,

Warrnambool, Victoria 3280, AustraliaE-mail: [email protected]

Airoldi, L., Abbiati, M., Beck, M. W., Hawkins, S. J., Jonsson, P.R., Martin, D., Moschella, P. S., Sundelof, A., Thompson, R.C. & Aberg, P. 2005. An ecological perspective on thedeployment and design of low-crested and other hard coastaldefence structures. Coast. Eng. 52:1073–87.

Bellgrove, A., Clayton, M. N. & Quinn, G. P. 1997. Effects of sec-ondarily treated sewage effluent on intertidal macroalgalrecruitment processes. Mar. Freshwater Res. 48:137–46.

Bellgrove, A., Clayton, M. N. & Quinn, G. P. 2004. An integratedstudy of the temporal and spatial variation in the supply ofpropagules, recruitment and assemblages of intertidal macro-algae on a wave-exposed rocky coast, Victoria, Australia.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 310:207–25.

Brown, M., Coelho, S. & Rijstenbil, J. 2000. Impacts of anthropo-genic stresses on the early development stages of seaweeds.J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recovery 7:317.

Clark, J. S., Poore, A. G. B., Ralph, P. J. & Doblin, M. A. 2013.Potential for adaptation in response to thermal stress in anintertidal macroalga. J. Phycol.

Coleman, M. A., Chambers, J., Knott, N. A., Malcolm, H. A.,Harasti, D., Jordan, A. & Kelaher, B. P. 2011. Connectivitywithin and among a network of temperate marine reserves.PLoS ONE 6:e20168.

Coleman, M. A., Gillanders, B. M. & Connell, S. D. 2009. Dis-persal and gene flow in the habitat-forming kelp, Eckloniaradiata: relative degrees of isolation across an east-west coast-line. Mar. Freshwater Res. 60:802–9.

Fabry, V. J., Seibel, B. A., Feely, R. A. & Orr, J. C. 2008. Impactsof ocean acidification on marine fauna and ecosystem pro-cesses. ICES J. Mar. Sci.: Journal du Conseil 65:414–32.

Hawkins, S. J., Moore, P. J., Burrows, M. T., Poloczanska, E., Mies-zkowska, N., Herbert, R. J. H., Jenkins, S. R., Thompson, R.C., Genner, M. J. & Southward, A. J. 2008. Complex interac-tions in a rapidly changing world: responses of rocky shorecommunities to recent climate change. Clim. Res. 37:123–33.

Hoffmann, A. A. & Sgro, C. M. 2011. Climate change and evolu-tionary adaptation. Nature 470:479–85.

FIG. 1. Thermal reaction norms of performance of differentgenotypes (represented by each line) exposed to control and ele-vated temperatures. Nonparallel and/or overlapping lines indi-cate genotype–environment interactions illustrating geneticvariation in performance with temperature, whereas parallel linesindicate temperature-independent variability in performance.Based on Clark et al. (2013) and Kingsolver et al. (2004).

(a) (b)

FIG. 2. (a) The fucoid alga, Hormosira banksii, forms extensivecanopies dominating the rocky intertidal of temperate Australasiafrom Albany, Western Australia to northern New South Wales,around Tasmania, the North and South Islands of New Zealandand some of the smaller offshore islands in southern Australasia;(b) during intense and prolonged periods of high temperatureand UV exposure the thallus of H. banksii can become sunburnt.Oxidized phenolic compounds are released from physodes in theperipheral cells and protect the photosynthetic tissue beneath(Schoenwaelder 2002), but, in extreme cases, can lead to tissuedeath and significant canopy loss (Keough and Quinn 1998).Photographs courtesy of Jennifer Clark, University of Technology,Sydney.

628 ALGAE HIGHLIGHTS

ALGAEH

IGHLIG

HT

Page 3: Turning up the heat

Jenkins, S. R., Hawkins, S. J. & Norton, T. A. 1999. Direct andindirect effects of a macroalgal canopy and limpet grazing instructuring a sheltered inter-tidal community. Mar. Ecol. Prog.Ser. 188:81–92.

Jenkins, S. R., Norton, T. A. & Hawkins, S. J. 2004. Long termeffects of Ascophyllum nodosum canopy removal on mid shorecommunity structure. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 84:327–9.

Johnson, C. R., Banks, S. C., Barrett, N. S., Cazassus, F., Dunstan,P. K., Edgar, G. J., Frusher, S. D. et al. 2011. Climate changecascades: shifts in oceanography, species’ ranges and subtidalmarine community dynamics in eastern Tasmania. J. Exp.Mar. Biol. Ecol. 400:17–32.

Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H. & Shachak, M. 1994. Organisms asecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–86.

Keough, M. J. & Quinn, G. P. 1998. Effects of periodic distur-bances from trampling on rocky intertidal algal beds. Ecol.App. 8:141–61.

Kingsolver, J. G., Izem, R. & Ragland, G. J. 2004. Plasticity of sizeand growth in fluctuating thermal environments: comparingreaction norms and performance curves. Integr. Comp. Biol.44:450–60.

Last, P. R., White, W. T., Gledhill, D. C., Hobday, A. J., Brown, R.,Edgar, G. J. & Pecl, G. 2011. Long-term shifts in abundance anddistribution of a temperate fish fauna: a response to climatechange and fishing practices.Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20:58–72.

Lilley, S. A. & Schiel, D. R. 2006. Community effects followingthe deletion of a habitat-forming alga from rocky marineshores. Oecologia 148:672–81.

Lima, F. P. & Wethey, D. S. 2012. Three decades of high-resolu-tion coastal sea surface temperatures reveal more than warm-ing. Nat. Comm. 3:704.

Ling, S. D., Johnson, C. R., Frusher, S. D. & Ridgway, K. R. 2009a.Overfishing reduces resilience of kelp beds to climate-drivencatastrophic phase shift. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106:22341–5.

Ling, S. D., Johnson, C. R., Ridgway, K., Hobday, A. J. & Haddon,M. 2009b. Climate-driven range extension of a sea urchin:inferring future trends by analysis of recent populationdynamics. Glob. Change Biol. 15:719–31.

Millar, A. J. K. 2007. The Flindersian and Peronian Provinces. InMcCarthy, P. M. & Orchard, A. E. [Eds.] Algae of Australia:Introduction. CSIRO publishing, Canberra, pp. 554–9.

Nguyen, K. D. T., Morley, S. A., Lai, C. H., Clark, M. S., Tan, K.S., Bates, A. E. & Peck, L. S. 2011. Upper temperature limitsof tropical marine ectotherms: global warming implications.PLoS ONE 6:e29340, 1–8.

Pandolfi, J. M., Connolly, S. R., Marshall, D. J. & Cohen, A. L.2011. Projecting coral reef futures under global warmingand ocean acidification. Science 333:418–22.

Pitt, N. R., Poloczanska, E. S. & Hobday, A. J. 2010. Climate-dri-ven range changes in Tasmanian intertidal fauna. Mar. Fresh-water Res. 61:963–70.

Poloczanska, E. S., Smith, S., Fauconnet, L., Healy, J., Tibbetts, I.R., Burrows, M. T. & Richardson, A. J. 2011. Little change inthe distribution of rocky shore faunal communities on theAustralian east coast after 50 years of rapid warming. J. Exp.Mar. Biol. Ecol. 400:145–54.

Russell, B. D., Thompson, J. A. I., Falkenberg, L. J. & Connell, S.D. 2009. Synergistic effects of climate change and local stres-sors: CO2 and nutrient-driven change in subtidal rocky habi-tats. Global Change Biol. 15:2153–62.

Russell, B. D., Harley, C. D. G., Wernberg, T., Mieszkowska, N.,Widdicombe, S., Hall-Spencer, J. M. & Connell, S. D. 2012.Predicting ecosystem shifts requires new approaches thatintegrate the effects of climate change across entire systems.Biol. Lett. 8:164–6.

Santelices, B. 1990. Patterns of reproduction, dispersal andrecruitment in seaweeds. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 28:177–276.

Schiel, D. R., Steinbeck, J. R. & Foster, M. S. 2004. Ten years ofinduced ocean warming causes comprehensive changes inmarine benthic communities. Ecology 85:1833–39.

Schiel, D. R. 2006. Rivets or bolts? When single species count inthe function of temperate rocky reef communities. J. Exp.Mar. Biol. Ecol. 338:233–52.

Schiel, D. R. 2011. Biogeographic patterns and long-term changeson New Zealand coastal reefs: non-trophic cascades fromdiffuse and local impacts. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 400:33–51.

Schiel, D. R. & Lilley, S. A. 2011. Impacts and negative feedbacksin community recovery over eight years following removalof habitat-forming macroalgae. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 407:108–15.

Schoenwaelder, M. E. A. 2002. Physode distribution and theeffect of ‘thallus sunburn’ in Hormosira banksii (Fucales,Phaeophyceae). Bot. Mar. 45:262–6.

Stillman, J. H. & Somero, G. N. 2000. A comparative analysis ofthe upper thermal tolerance limits of eastern Pacific porce-lain crabs, genus Petrolisthes: influences of latitude, verticalzonation, acclimation, and phylogeny. Physiol. Biochem. Zool.73:200–08.

Wernberg, T., Russell, B. D., Thomsen, M. S., Gurgel, C. F. D.,Bradshaw, C. J. A., Poloczanska, E. S. & Connell, S. D. 2011a.Seaweed communities in retreat from ocean warming. Curr.Biol. 21:1828–32.

Wernberg, T., Thomsen, M. S., Tuya, F. & Kendrick, G. A. 2011b.Biogenic habitat structure of seaweeds change along a latitu-dinal gradient in ocean temperature. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.400:264–71.

ALGAE HIGHLIGHTS 629

ALGAEH

IGHLIG

HT