two reasons stir is wrong
TRANSCRIPT
Two reasons STIR is wrong for the West End
www.westendneighbours.caTown Hall Meeting, Coast Plaza Hotel, Comox Street, April 22, 2010
Two questions. Will STIR…
1) … lower rents in the WE?
• Size of increase in supply?
• Price sensitive buyers?
5) … put City’s fiscal future in jeopardy by subsidizing developers?
Is large decline in rents likely? NO!
• Currently under 500 new rental units, or under 2.2% of available rentals: NEGLIGIBLE
• Buyers price sensitive: a lot of their income spent on rent and there are good alternative locations (Yaletown, along Canada Line)
In summary…
• Small increase in supply is unlikely push rents down a lot
• Even a small reduction in rents would cause many renters from alternative locations to come to WE, preventing further reductions
Subsidies to developers: TENS OF MILLIONS OF $
• Foregone development revenue (cost levies and amenity contributions)
• The city needs this revenue from new development to fund broader infrastructure improvements associated with increased loads on municipal services.
Don’t fall for this one
• Developer’s argument: but market rentals ARE amenities
• A bit like saying a for-profit rent-a-car company represents public transportation
Impending fiscal crisis?
• At times of high deficits ($50 million), City itself recognizes:
“historically low development revenue”
as one of the causes of budget shortfall.
• STIR means foregoing more development revenue on an unprecedented scale.
Above all…
CITY SUBSIDIZES THE DEVELOPER, BUT THE
DEVELOPER DOES NOT SUBSIDIZE THE RENTER.
Sources:
• For City finances:
http://vancouver.ca/fs/budgetServices/operatingBudget/pdf/City2010Budget-presentation.pdf
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/planning/census/2006/localareas/westend.pdf
• For rental statistics:
Above all…
• All the sources for STIR are too numerous to cite, but a good place to start is:http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/developmentservices/stir/index.htm
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/cityplans/fg/index.htm
• Specifically, on levies and contributions: