typica axial load structural load test l.j j...".:p ~~:. .."','ii _~ '! css...

9
r_ CENTAUR STANDARD SHROUD (CSS) TESTS ,..- CENTAUR STANDARD SHROUD LN 2 .. ,... TITAN INTER STAGE ADAPTER -- -- TITAN FORWARD SKIRT .'/ .. CENTAURfCSS TYPICA_ AXIAL LOAD l.J J TIE POINT - _ . ......-- TRUSS ADAPTER ·"-:-TYPICAl SIDE LOAD CSS nop <. i"; -- STUB ADAPTER .N,- xf : . STRUCTURAL LOAD TEST A. CSS LOADS 1. TEST TO FLIGHT ULTIMATE LOADS, 2 AXES 2. DETERMINE CENTAUR LOAD SHARING B. SPACECRAFT LOADS .' 1. TEST TO FLIGHT ULTIMATE LOADS, 2 AXES Z. COMBINE WITH CSS LOADS, 2 AXES ) ;;(7"RYOGENIC TESTS A. HEAT TRANSFER 1. DETERMINE BOILOFF RATES ,FOR GROUND HOLD B. VENT 1. VERIFY VENT SYSTEM CAPACITY C. UNLATCH 1. VERIFY SATISFACTORY SEPARATION 2. DETERMINE SEPARATION LOADS 3. VERIFY . i . .• I IlL JmlSON TESTS A. SEA LEVEL 1. DETERMINE STRUCTURAL FLEXING 2. DETERMINE HINGE RELEASE BEHAVIOR AND LOADS 3. MEASURE SEA LEVEl TRAJECTORY (CALCULATE ALTITUDE TRAJ ECTORY) B. ALTITUDE 1. SAME AS FOR II SEA LEVEl, II EXCEPT MEASURE ALTITUDE TRAJ ECTORY ,." ... II iV\/,-'A· . ' , ' i: ; , ! ," ;: :I , f I " 11};/A71

Upload: others

Post on 25-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TYPICA AXIAL LOAD STRUCTURAL LOAD TEST l.J J...".:P ~~:. .."','Ii _~ '! CSS TEST~G AT PLUM BROOK SPF ADVANTAGES 1. EXISTING EQUIPMENT A. SUITABLE BASIC JmlSON TEST STAND (FROM SATURN

r _

CENTAUR STANDARD SHROUD (CSS) TESTS

,..- CENTAUR STANDARD SHROUDLN2 ..

,... ~.~- TITAN INTERSTAGE ADAPTER

-- - - TITAN FORWARD SKIRT.'/ ..

CENTAURfCSS

TYPICA_ AXIAL LOAD

l.J JTIE POINT - _ . ·:~T; ......-- TRUSS ADAPTER

~-f ·"-:-TYPICAl SIDE LOADCSS nop RfMOVtDl~.' <. i"; - - STUB ADAPTER

.N,-

xf: .STRUCTURAL LOAD TESTA. CSS LOADS

1. TEST TO FLIGHT ULTIMATE LOADS, 2 AXES2. DETERMINE CENTAUR LOAD SHARING

B. SPACECRAFT LOADS .'1. TEST TO FLIGHT ULTIMATE LOADS, 2 AXESZ. COMBINE WITH CSS LOADS, 2 AXES

.~

):.~ ;;(7"RYOGENIC TESTS

A. HEAT TRANSFER1. DETERMINE BOILOFF RATES ,FOR GROUND HOLD

B. VENT1. VERIFY VENT SYSTEM CAPACITY

C. UNLATCH1. VERIFY SATISFACTORY SEPARATION2. DETERMINE SEPARATION LOADS3. VERIFY CLEA~ANCES

. i

..• I

IlL JmlSON TESTSA. SEA LEVEL

1. DETERMINE STRUCTURAL FLEXING2. DETERMINE HINGE RELEASE BEHAVIOR AND LOADS3. MEASURE SEA LEVEl TRAJECTORY (CALCULATE

ALTITUDE TRAJ ECTORY)B. ALTITUDE

1. SAME AS FOR II SEA LEVEl, II EXCEPT MEASUREALTITUDE TRAJ ECTORY ,." ... II

iV\/,-'A·. ', '

i:; ,

! ,"

; : : I, ~.

• f I ~: • "

11};/A71

Page 2: TYPICA AXIAL LOAD STRUCTURAL LOAD TEST l.J J...".:P ~~:. .."','Ii _~ '! CSS TEST~G AT PLUM BROOK SPF ADVANTAGES 1. EXISTING EQUIPMENT A. SUITABLE BASIC JmlSON TEST STAND (FROM SATURN

ess TESTING AT PLUM BROOK B'-3

;,_ BUILDING STRUCTURE

~ LOADING SYSTEM (TYPICAlI

~-~:-__ ::"_-_:.:_-. - - -

I... DOOR EXTENDS TO73'(J1 FLOOR

!I

Of

-i

d~.-

.~~- ..... ,i

-l " "

.1 "p-- - ,...

II ;

1r---~ ;I t

ifF j.I

ADVANTAGES

1. EXISTING EQUIPMENTA. SUITABLE BASIC TEST STAND AND ASSEMBLY AREAS

B. LH2 AND LN2 Fill AND VENT, GHZ BURNER

c. HYDRAULIC, GHa, GN2 SYSTEMS

D. «Xl-CHANN£l DATA SYSTEM2. EXPERIENCED MANPOWER AVAILABLE (BASED ON KNOWN TEST

PROGRAMS)

3. ENGINEERS AND TECHNICIANS KNOW CENTAUR (MINIMUM GD!CSUPPORT NEEDED)

4. EASY TO MONITOR AND TO REVISE TEST PLANS

EXISTING FLOORElEVATION 7JU' ""',

" .. :"~.'

:: .......: ~

.'---.

STRUCTURAL TESTSB-3 FACILITY

DISADVANTAGE1. MUST ADD NETS FOR JffilSON TESTS

I

I

..........

,il~_- B-3 FACILITY

.:.. '. . __1- -CSS ROTATES UP TO 17"-,- I WITHOUT MODS TO B-;

II iI

I r NETS FORI / JETTISON (NEW)

I• . I,,

ElEVATION 7} (II -~'WU_.--l.._--i-_=C[ij~~~~:J».

CRYOGENIC & JETTISON TEST

Page 3: TYPICA AXIAL LOAD STRUCTURAL LOAD TEST l.J J...".:P ~~:. .."','Ii _~ '! CSS TEST~G AT PLUM BROOK SPF ADVANTAGES 1. EXISTING EQUIPMENT A. SUITABLE BASIC JmlSON TEST STAND (FROM SATURN

".:P ~~: . .."','Ii _~ '!

-;.:.. ~.:......." -"- ~

CSS TEST~G AT PLUM BROOK SPF

ADVANTAGES

1. EXISTING EQUIPMENTA. SUITABLE BASIC JmlSON TEST STAND (FROM SATURN

SHROUD TESTS)B. LN2 FILL AND VENT SYSTEMC. 250-CHANNEL DATA SYSTEM

2. ALTITUDE CAPABILITY

3. EASY TO MONITOR AND TO REVISE TEST PLANS

DISADVANTAGES

1. NO EXISTING STRUCTURAL TEST STAND

2. lH2 SYSTEM PROBLEMSA. SAFETY IN VACUUM CHAMBERB. LONG LINESC. NO EXISTING CONTROLS OR VENTS

CONCRETE TESTCHAMBER ENCLOSURE- ..&:<i'·

. ~. "C}...

CENTAUR VEHICLE, .,,:~:J:WITH CSS .:r'INSTALLED --... ;....t·

...... '.-

~fo·~.'

~:'~S·..

.. ....~

'DISASSEMBLYAREA

I:- SHROUDCATCH NET

rAJ VACUUM TEST CHM/IBER

TRAJECTORY

ASSEf...'BLYAREA

Page 4: TYPICA AXIAL LOAD STRUCTURAL LOAD TEST l.J J...".:P ~~:. .."','Ii _~ '! CSS TEST~G AT PLUM BROOK SPF ADVANTAGES 1. EXISTING EQUIPMENT A. SUITABLE BASIC JmlSON TEST STAND (FROM SATURN

• ~ ..... ~ •. ~.~.t!;.. ":~. ".:::: •

.... ._ _ ~ :_"'~. ::i;~.<-. ':':;."-.. '__ . : _ •• _0',;0-. ~:"'.'::;':.~"'_'

• It

ess TESTING AT LMse

JETTISON TESTS(SUNNYVALE BLDG 182)

ADVANTAGES

1. EXISTING EQUIPMENTA. BASIC STRUCTURAL TEST STAND, USED FOR AF lO-FT

SHROUD

B. CRYOGENIC TEST STAND, WITH DEWARS AND DATA SYSTEM

C. SEA LEVEL JETTISON TEST STAND, USED FOR AF lO-FTSHROUD

2. EXPERIENCED WITH SIMILAR TESTS OF LARGE SHROUDS

3. INCREASED CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY

4. LOWER COST LMSCSUPPORT

DISADVANTAGES

1. MINOR MODIFICATIONS NEEDED TO EACH OF THREE TEST SITES

2. NO CENTAUR EXPERIENCE (NEED GDIC SUPPO~3. CHANGE ORDERS WOULD INCREASE CONTRACT COST

r NET SUPPORTSTRUCTURE

SHROUOCATCHING NET

EXISTING TEST STANO"", /

LOADING SYSTEM '~(TYPICAU\,- - - - .. -.../~~~.- - - -i

\/ ~ ,\ t·

"'n----n' T,. t\ Ii'\1 1 : I

l' I irI I :

.F==, I

1/-//STRUCTURAL TESTS

(SUNNYVALE BLOG 102)

/\~,ail\~ ,r- EXISTING/" : ~,' , :: ,\< BUI~DING, '\: ':' I ~ / \~\ I, I fL__'>,

1/ \ " \ ,: L/'

,,_ '; .... I, "j\\ \ . \, I /.1 ./~ \"/ C-...I 'I, I / : r CSS '. -.

; \ \: \: r ROTATES I" ~i "i : 10° MAX "

~/ 'I \ ' J \

L~:-~t-_~Ii: _._7

CRYOGENIC TESTS(MODIFIED CRYO TEST SITE

AT SANTA CRUZ)

~ ..:" .-:.~. ~-- ". :--to: - .. ,-". ~.. ., ~-;~ .......... ""- 1;'; y>,".- --t'.

Page 5: TYPICA AXIAL LOAD STRUCTURAL LOAD TEST l.J J...".:P ~~:. .."','Ii _~ '! CSS TEST~G AT PLUM BROOK SPF ADVANTAGES 1. EXISTING EQUIPMENT A. SUITABLE BASIC JmlSON TEST STAND (FROM SATURN

- ::---

- -; ~.~ .._._ '.':: '.. ..'";. -..:. '" .• - •• ~ "':.40. .. -. _ ...;..~. - .• .,. ..

. j

COST FOR CSS TESTING AT PLUM BROOK B-3

TESTS PLUM BROOK LMSC SUBTOTALSUPPORT

MAN-HR, LABOR CONTRACT.-.COST**HR¥ COST

STRUCTURAL 29000 $ 580000 $150 000 109 000 $ --839 000

CRYO 14000 280000 75 000 - 112 000 467 000

(UNLATCH, VENT, &

HEAT TRANSFER)

JETTISON '--~~OOO- -c- - 149-{)oo- 120m - -1-6-7--eoo--- -4l7-000---

(SEA LEVEL)

50,000 $1 000 000 $345 000 388000

GRAND TOTAL / $1 733 000

::cTOTAL REQUIREJV'ENT; TECH IAN HR ~ 2/3, ENGINEERING HR ~ 1/3•

Page 6: TYPICA AXIAL LOAD STRUCTURAL LOAD TEST l.J J...".:P ~~:. .."','Ii _~ '! CSS TEST~G AT PLUM BROOK SPF ADVANTAGES 1. EXISTING EQUIPMENT A. SUITABLE BASIC JmlSON TEST STAND (FROM SATURN

.; . "., ...... ...-=-_.. -.;..:.. f ~ "1f'"'. ,"!(t. .- :".-' ..- ..,,'"

.......:.4;',.: : :-t1::.. : .' ~l·.~

.... ' COST FOR CSS TESTING AT PLUM BROOK SPFPlum·."~r'ook SPF Estimate*

4t-8,OOO

246~OOO

231~OOO

..... 399,000

$ 629,000

Subtotal

Sl:O:-6,OOO

Subtotal

$ 1,106,000

.,. (

LMSCContract Support

Cost

$ .318,000 $ 109,000

66,000 112,000

16,000 167,000

$ 400,000 $ 388,000

GRAND TOTAL

and with shroud catcher and half of needed instrumentation(to be done in late 1970)2/3, engineering hr~ 1/3

Plum BrookMan-hr., Labor

Hr** Cost***

Based on testing in sequence sho;available from Saturn shrou estsTotal requ~en~ tee . lan hr ~

Man-hr. a\..'CJ~ ~ ..:; ~ :". .....Y7 . ,.

LVD

Tests Plum LMSCMan-hr. , Contract Support

Hr** Cost

t 27,000 540,000 $ 407~000 $ 109,000Structural

Cryo (unlatch, vfnt,& heat tr'ansfer) 16,200 324,000 52,000 . 112,000

Jettison (altitude orsea level) 10,800 216,000 16,000 167,000

·54,000 $1,080,000 $ 475,000 $ 388,000

GRAND TOTAL

Tests

*

Structural t 10,100 $ 202,000

.- . Cryo (unlatch, vtnt,& heat transfer) 3,400 68,000

Jettison (altitudeor sea level) 2,400 48,000

15,900 $ 318,000

t Area safety not resolved

*****

Page 7: TYPICA AXIAL LOAD STRUCTURAL LOAD TEST l.J J...".:P ~~:. .."','Ii _~ '! CSS TEST~G AT PLUM BROOK SPF ADVANTAGES 1. EXISTING EQUIPMENT A. SUITABLE BASIC JmlSON TEST STAND (FROM SATURN

COST FOR CSS JETTISON TESTING AT PLUM BHOOK spr~t.··}.·

iii;".~ .

TEST

PLUM BROOK SPF ESTIMATE

PLUM BROOK LMSCSUPPORT

MANHOUR LABOR CONTRACTCOST*

TOTAL

•,..

JETTISON

(ALTITUDE)

"1\.~..•..... ".

~

,I.,~~ ..,''i~

10,200 $204,000 $95,000 $167,000

~

~I\-{;;>*MANHOUR AT e3YHR.

**BASED ON USING EQUIPMENT FROM SATURN SHROUD TEST

(10/70 thru S/71).

$466,000

Page 8: TYPICA AXIAL LOAD STRUCTURAL LOAD TEST l.J J...".:P ~~:. .."','Ii _~ '! CSS TEST~G AT PLUM BROOK SPF ADVANTAGES 1. EXISTING EQUIPMENT A. SUITABLE BASIC JmlSON TEST STAND (FROM SATURN

w .. ~. ~ .-,;... ' •• ~ ~ ./0. .

~:.~:~;~""'" 'r:4~""",·t~~'>~.....,.", :~t'''''~i~'"f'~ ~"'!~~.~ ~ '1, .• ~>*,~~.;~~i;:~:C~~~~'i(::~ ~"(~~~~f5~~~>'~".. - ' ,- :" , . ,', 1'" , '~

" '

~?r... !~: ..,:.4 ~ :. ~'... ~ :~" , '-:~,' ~-fOST ~,"fO~,;CSS.·.~.ESIJ.~(i ,~r~ ..~~.,~~.~.":l!-" -: ,~;. :.' .'::, ...:'.,. ....r.: ".. -

- tE~TS . ;,lMSC'~lA80R &"MATERIAL

GO/C, SUBTOTALSUPPORT*

. . '."'. /

$270 000 $ " 654 000

':- i270000' ,":, '~~l~f(xx), ..,- ~ ..

,:312000

'$ 384 000

o <f'118 000 ' "

:;.-:.......~.-, .~." ,<'

- -_..;~.,

,ST~UCTURAL:. ; _ .~. _r-" ~

.. <.";. ~ ..' . ~ ~... ..' '" .

"CR-YO

(UNlATCH,V-ENT, & '

HEAT TRANSfER)'

· ' JETTISON(SEA LEVELl

'. :.' ~

, -

. ".... - .k.),•.!o" ":' :.' " • _." _ ~ ...-:" • _•.' p •••; ,.... • •••

$1104 000

'. ·r ,F'~'

GRAND TOTAL ~l 794 000

·,::~EEDED,TO ERECJ& MAINTAIN CENTAUR AT lMSC TEST SfTES."-\.,+. • ~- •.~'.'. • ::." -'

, . ---f·" .~:

Page 9: TYPICA AXIAL LOAD STRUCTURAL LOAD TEST l.J J...".:P ~~:. .."','Ii _~ '! CSS TEST~G AT PLUM BROOK SPF ADVANTAGES 1. EXISTING EQUIPMENT A. SUITABLE BASIC JmlSON TEST STAND (FROM SATURN

-~, :~~'::,: "~." ~

.d"c':.

CSS SCHEDULE AND PLUM BROOK RSD MANPOWER REQUIREMENTS

~.::.;:- .. -,;;;

~- "

.CY 70 CY 71" CY 72 CY 73 CY 74

." ~- :~- ..:: ........

CSS SCHEDULE*PROCUREMENT

DESIGN

FABRICATION

TEST SITE PREPARATIONS

CRYOGENIC TESTS

STRUCTURAL TESTS

JETTISON TESTS

DELIVER FU{;HT SHROUD

PROOF FLIGHT

B-2 &F(KNOWN WORK)

HTF(KNOWN WORK)

K(KNOWN WORK)

B-3**~~

(PROPOSED WORK)

--& ~

lMSC GDIC

T1000

MAN-WK!YR

~~~~~""""'""'!-l

.i

*SCHEDULE NO-f DEPENDENT ON WHERE TESTING IS DONE.*:;;BAR HEIGHT SHOWS TECHNICIAN REQUIREMENTS ESTIMATED BY RSD, AVERAGED OVER WHOLE YEAR.

"'u:C*ALSO NEED 4 ENGINEERS FOR FULL TIME.

., "r"'