ubisecure oy | data quality report | august 2019 · data quality scores ubisecure oy | data quality...
TRANSCRIPT
Statistics
Data Quality Scores
Ubisecure Oy | Data Quality Report | August 2019
LEI Issuer Total Data Quality Score LEI Issuer Total Data Quality Score Trend
LEI Issuer Data Quality ( ) against LEI Pool Average ( )
The LEI Issuer Total Data Quality Score is calculated as the equal weightedaverage of the 11 ‘Data Quality Criteria’.
Progress achieved with regard to the continuous optimization of the dataquality based on the LEI Issuer Total Data Quality Score.
Data Quality in Covered Countries
Quality Maturity Level
100%
75%
AugJulJun
99.99 % 99.99 %99.96 %
DISCLAIMER: All figures of this LEI Data Quality Report are derived from these sources: 1) Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) Concatenated end-of-month files for all months mentionedin this report and 2) the Data Quality Reports for the reported month based on the LEI-Data-Quality-Check Specification v2.1.7. While every care has been taken in the compilation of thisinformation, GLEIF will not be held responsible for any loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of inaccuracy or error within the LEI Data Quality Report. The text and graphic content of theLEI Data Quality Report may be used, printed and distributed ONLY with the copyright information displayed (© Copyright Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF)).
AugJulJunMayFeb MarJan AprOct NovSep DecAug
100%0%
99 %
100%
<90%
JulAug # Checks # Failed Records
The Data Quality criteria is expected to contain 12 dimensions. Currently a subset of 11criteria is implemented, to the detriment of the score, as they are averaged on all ofthem. This is expected to change, on a nonfixed timeline, to include all 12 dimensions.
Data Quality Criteria
Active entities managed
49 (+19.51 %)
Challenges this month
Inactive entities managed
Managed LEIs
206 (+19.76 %)
Values
LEIs with complete parent information
6 (-53.84 %)
14,878 (+13.22 %)
23 (+15.00 %)
Duplicate percentage of managed LEIs < 1 % (+1.56 %)
LEIs with LEI parent relationships
4 (-55.55 %)
Level 2 Info
55 (+3.77 %)
Totals
New lapsed LEIs *
14,865 (+13.21 %)
1 (-50.00 %)
13 (+30.00 %)
Values
ValuesChallenges
Covered countries
Total LEIs marked as duplicate **
Duplicates found this month
** RegistrationStatus = DUPLICATE
14,870 (+13.20 %)
Values
Duplicates
* Please see our Business Report www.gleif.org/business-reportsfor detailed information around lapsed LEIs.
Updates to entity information this month
Files Values
31 / 31 (+/-0 %)No. of days per month with CDF-compliant file uploads
L3 Excellent qualityL2 Expected qualityL1 Required quality
C000245
C000243
LEI has exactly one record for ultimate parent a...
If the ultimate parent is public: The ultimate par...
# Failed Records
4 This LEI must not have any parent RR record in R...
C000276
Check description
2 RegistrationAuthorityEntityID is in an expected f...
C000263 4
Top 5 Failing Checks
They must be managed by the same LOU that m...
1
C000291 3
99.99 %
100.00 %
100.00 %
3
99.99 %
100.00 %
100.00 %
99.99 %
Representation
100.00 % 0 (0 %)
100.00 %
8 (0.05 %)
Accuracy
1
99.98 % 1
2
Completeness
100.00 %
100.00 %Integrity
0 (0 %)
Currency
Comprehensiveness 100.00 %
Provenance
Uniqueness
0 (0 %)8
2 (0.01 %)
15
4 (0.02 %)99.99 %
0 (0 %)
Consistency
18
100.00 % 0 (0 %)
100.00 %
1
2
0 (0 %)
99.99 %
Validity
21
99.96 %
99.99 %
100.00 %
100.00 %
Accessibility
2
0 (0 %)
0 (0 %)
100.00 %