ucmttem seminar oct_2014
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Group Seminar 2014
Progress on Experimental and Numerical analysis with a special focus on Corevo Foam and Perlite Composite Material (PMC)
2nd October 2014
By: Mohd Ayub Sulong
![Page 2: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Supervisors:
Dr. Thomas Fiedler*Prof. Dr. Irina BelovaProf. Dr. Graeme MurchProf. Dr. Andreas Oechsner
*Principal supervisor
1
![Page 3: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction
Fig. 1: Metal foam made of Zinc and bread roll (Banhart J., 2002)
2
![Page 4: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Stochastic
3
![Page 5: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Introduction
Corevo foam Perlite composite material (PCM) Sintered Titania
Scaffold
4
![Page 6: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Computed tomography method
Fig. 2: Computed tomography method from raw image to 3D model.
5
![Page 7: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Introduction
Fig. 3: Corevo or salt foam
Average pore size, d=5.6 mm Average pore
size, d=1.9 mm
6
![Page 8: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Base Material Properties Corevo Foam: Aluminium alloy - AS7G06 (Al, 7 wt%Si, 0.6 wt%
Mg) Density = 2675kg/m3
Young’s modulus = 74 GPa Poisson’s ratio = 0.33 Yield stress = 241 MPa
7
![Page 9: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Experimental analysis
Fig. 4: Equivalent plastic strain distribution for (a) d=5.6 mm, sample S#2 (b) d=1.9 mm), sample A (Fiedler et. al, 2014).
ISO 13314 standard
8
![Page 10: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Failure Analysis
Fig. 5: 0.2% offset yield stress result of sample S#1 and S#2.
9
![Page 11: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Failure Analysis
Fig. 6: Equivalent plastic strain distribution for (a) d=5.6 mm, sample S#2 (b) d=1.9 mm), sample A (Fiedler et. al, 2014).
10
![Page 12: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Failure Analysis
Fig. 7: Uni-axial compression test done on Sample S#1
11
![Page 13: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Failure Analysis
Fig. 8: Experimental compression test snapshots of (a) Corevo® foam samples with an average pore size (d=5.6 mm) , sample S#2 (b) Corevo® foam samples with an average pore size (d=1.9 mm), sample B.
12
![Page 14: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Introduction
Perlite Composite Material (PCM)
13
![Page 15: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
PMC base material: Aluminium alloy - A356 (7.2 wt% Si, 0.4 wt% Mg, 0.1 wt% Ti, 0.12 wt% Fe) Density = 2.675 g/cm3
Young’s modulus = 75 GPa Poisson’s ratio = 0.33
Expanded perlite (EP) particles Density ≈ 0.1 g/cm3
Young’s modulus = less than 5GPa Composition: 75 wt% SiO2, 14 wt% Al2O3, 3 wt% Na2O, 4 wt% K2O, 1.3 wt%
CaO, 1 wt% Fe2O3, 0.3 wt% MgO, 0.2 wt% TiO2 with traces of heavy metal oxides.
14
![Page 16: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Sample S 3D view on BoneJ
Fig. 9: Sample S visualised by BoneJ software
15
![Page 17: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
PCM with 3 particle sizes
Fig. 10: Strut’s local thickness distribution for PCM materials.
16
![Page 18: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Boundary Conditions-PCM
Fig. 11: Mesh sensitivity analysis and boundary conditions used for PCM
17
![Page 19: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Collapse Mechanism- Treated
Fig. 12: Failure mechanism observed for treated PCM samples
18
![Page 20: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
19
Fig. 13: Failure mechanism observed for untreated PCM samples
Collapse Mechanism- Untreated
![Page 21: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Sample#10
Failure Analysis
Fig. 14: Equivalent plastic strain prediction for PCM with average EP particle size of 3-4 mm (Group M)
Sample#13
20
![Page 22: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Average stress-strain curves from experiments
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7020406080
100120140
Stress_SStress_MStress_L
Strain ( - )
Stre
ss (
MPa
)
Fig. 15: Experimental average stress-strain data for three groups of EP particle size sample
21
![Page 23: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Material Properties-Solid samples
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50100200300400500600700800 HT3 Initial YS E_Low E_Literature
Strain ( - )
Stre
ss (
MPa
)
Fig. 16: Experimental average stress-strain data for three groups of EP particle size sample
22
![Page 24: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Material Properties
-0.0999999999999998 0.1 0.30
100
200
300
400
500
600Piece-wise hardening modulus model
UT_solid_sampleHT3_exp
Strain, -
Stre
ss, M
Pa
E_Exp = 9.8 GpaEquivalent E = 9.8 GPaE_literature = 75 GPa
Fig. 17: Experimental average stress-strain data for three groups of EP particle size sample
23
![Page 25: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Material Properties
Fig. 18: Experimental average stress-strain data for three groups of EP particle size sample
Numerical result without hardening modulus defined
24
![Page 26: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Material Properties
Item S M L
Young’s modulus, E (GPa) 12 14 14
Yield Stress 230 230 250
Hardening Modulus, HM y = 10x2 – 3x +1 y = 0.2x +1 y=1
Poisson’s ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33
Fig. 19: Experimental average stress-strain data for three groups of EP
25
![Page 27: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
y = 10x2 – 3x +1
y = 0.2x +1
y=1
![Page 28: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Conclusions Corevo foam with two different average pore sizes
have been mechanically characterised. A significant change in plateau stress is observed
between these two group of Corevo foam. Material properties for perlite composite material
are developed using ‘reverse engineering’ method. PCM with different average particle sizes differ
significantly in hardening modulus.
27
![Page 29: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Q & A Session
28
![Page 30: Ucmttem seminar oct_2014](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051706/58f0af3e1a28ab677c8b465b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Thanks for your attention
29