RSP Event

Supporting and Enhancing Your Repository

21st January, 2013

Andrew Dorward

2

RJBroker Wave 1

Wave 1 Decisions by JISC

RoMEO

Juliet

Wave 1

Wave 1

ORI Wave 1

IRUS-UK Wave 1

NAMES2 Align with ORCID

ROAR

Open DOAR

ITT - OARR

ITT - OARR

IRS

REPUK

CORE

Innovation Zone

Innovation zone

Innovation Zone

A: Aggregation, Text mining & Search

B: Benchmarking, Statistics and Report

C: Creating Relevant Registries

D: Deposit Tools

E: Enhancing Metadata Quality

3

RepNet Service Portfolio (ITIL)

RoMEO-Hosted JULIET-Hosted

IRUS-UK ORI

RJBroker

Retired Services

Third-party components

Continual Service

Improvement Service

Concepts

Market Research

Service Transition

Service Design

Innovation Zone

(REPUK, CORE, IRS)

Operational Services

RoMEO JULIET

4

Overview External/existing systems/services

R-J B

roker

RoM

EO

JULIE

T

IRU

S-U

K

HEI Finance Systems

OpenDOAR

Aggregation and Search

Benchmarking and Reporting

Deposit tools

Registry of Repositories

Metadata quality

ROAR

Wave 1 components - Reporting and Deposit

ORI

KPL Study on Search

HEI CRIS SystemsIR Managers

5

RepNet snapshot – Autumn 2012External/existing systems/services HEI Finance Systems

Aggregation and Search

Benchmarking and Reporting

Deposit tools

Registry of Repositories

Metadata quality

R-J B

roker

RoM

EO

JULIE

T

IRU

S-U

K

OpenDOAR

ROAR

ORI

KPL Report on

Search

HEI CRIS Systems

IR Managers

6

RepNet snapshot – Winter 2012-13External/existing systems/services HEI Finance Systems

Aggregation and Search

Benchmarking and Reporting

Deposit tools

Registry of Repositories

Metadata quality

R-J B

roker

RoM

EO

JULIE

T

IRU

S-U

K

OpenDOAR

ROAR

ORI

KPL Report on

Search

HEI CRIS Systems

OARR

RepNet Service Desk

IR Managers

RepNet Service Catalogue

7

Review of new functionality for RepNet servicesHEI Finance Systems

Aggregation and Search

Benchmarking and Reporting

Deposit tools

Registry of Repositories

Metadata quality

R-J B

roker

RoM

EO

JULIE

T

IRU

S-U

K

OpenDOAR

ROAR

ORI

KPL Report on

Search

HEI CRIS Systems

OA

RR Metadata

Enhancement

Project Reporting

BenchmarkPublisher Website Delivery

Fund-Ref

DOI retrieval – Cross-Ref

PDF->XML

KeepIt (Eprints)

CRIS/Sword EndPoints

ISNI/ORCID

RIOXX

IR Managers

Gap analysis

CERIF/OAI-PMH

Supporting activities Consider for inclusion in RepNet service catalogue

RepNet Service Desk

RepNet Service Catalogue

8

Potential Reconfiguration + AggregationHEI Finance Systems

Aggregation and Search

Benchmarking and Reporting

Deposit tools

Registry of Repositories

Metadata quality

R-J B

roker

RoM

EO

JULIE

T

IRU

S-U

K

OpenDOAR

ROAR

ORI

KPL Report on

Search

HEI CRIS Systems

OA

RR Metadata

Enhancement

Project Reporting

BenchmarkPublisher Website Delivery

Potential New Service

Supporting activities Available through RepNet service catalogue

IR Managers

GAP

Aggregation middleware: from Registry, for Monitoring (and Search)

Rules-based Deposit for Broker

from RoMEO/JULIET

data

Deposit monitor

Potential Application onto Components

Fund-Ref

DOI retrieval – Cross-Ref

PDF->XML

KeepIt (Eprints)

CRIS/Sword EndPoints

ISNI/ORCID

RIOXX

CERIF/OAI-PMHRepNet Service Desk

RepNet Service Catalogue

9

Use cases for potential new applications- Pablo

10

The Value to Repository Managers- what’s in it for me?

11

The 4 challenges for IRs: Deposit; Discover; Report; Disseminate

• How to increase deposit rates into IRs, particularly full-text?• How to address publisher/funder OA policies at time of deposit

and impact on definition of item copyright and access levels?

Deposit

• How to improve repository content indexing rates for Google/Google Scholar?

• What means to measure and improve these?• Faceted search functionality for researchers/reporting?

Discover

• How can IRs address institutional and funder reporting requirements for OA policy?

• How can IRs co-exist with HEI CRIS systems? [1]

Report

• How to establish best practise with peers?• How to measure KPIs against peers?• How to establish IR’s value within HEI?

Disseminate

[1] there is a clear trend to making CERIF and CRISs the default standards for provision and exchange of research information. The transition to this model may affect demand over time for RepNet services. One of the RIOXX specific objectives is to “develop these [recommendations] such that they pave the way for a likely CERIF-based solution in the medium-long term” (http://blog.paulwalk.net/2012/12/23/rioxx-application-profile-draft-1/)

12

How challenges are addressed by RepNet

• Automated deposit from funder and subject repositories, publishers into IRs via R-J Broker

• Publisher and funder policies from RoMEO and JULIET• Further automation of R-J Broker through rules derived from R/J

Deposit

• UK-wide aggregation to collate IR metadata and expose OAI-PMH as tagged files for indexing

• Measure discoverability as download stats via IRUS

Discover

• Metadata enhancement through RIOXX, V4OA• Enrichment through feeds from CrossRef (DOI), Fundref

(Funder, project ID), IRIOS/UKRISS (output linked to funder info)• Report on mandate compliance through to research impact via

service built on aggregation

Report

• IR-focussed events through RSP, UKCoRR, COAR• IRUS, OARR for providing benchmarking• Improved project-based reporting; interoperability with CRIS

through CERIF; RepNet as observatory for IR-CRIS transition

Disseminate