unclassified / for official use only european union satellite centre © 2012 european union...

UNCLASSIFIED / FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

European Union Satellite Centre © 2012European Union Satellite Centre © 2011

BRIDGES: FP7 project in support of a sustainable development of GMES security

governance

EISC Workshop

14 May 2012, Cracow

European Union Satellite Centre

Denis BruckertGMES [email protected]

European Union Satellite Centre © 2011

An agency working for the Common Security and Defence Policy of the EU under the operational direction of the High Representative.

107 People (84 Staff, 18 Temporary, 5 SNEs) Budget 12,3 M € (2011)

Autonomous European Capability


“The Satellite Centre shall, in coherence with the European Security Strategy, support the decision-making of the European Union in the field of the CFSP, in particular of the ESDP, including European Union crisis management operations, by providing, as appropriate, products resulting from the analysis of satellite imagery and collateral data, including aerial imagery, and related services.”

Joint Action - Art. 2: Mission


JA Art. 3: Political Supervision

The Political and Security Committee (PSC) will, in accordance with its responsibilities for CFSP and in particular for the ESDP, exercise political supervision over the activities of the Centre and issue guidance to the Secretary-General / High Representative on the Centre’s priorities.

JA Art. 4: Operational direction

1. The Secretary-General/High Representative shall give operational direction to the Centre, without prejudice to the responsibilities of the Board and of the Director of the Centre, respectively, as set out in this Joint Action.

2. In the execution of his tasks as set out in this Article, the Secretary General/High Representative shall report as appropriate and at least once every six months to the Political and Security Committee.

Political Supervision – Operational Direction


EEAS – European External Action Service


EUSC accesses governmental satellite imagery

EUSC supports EU crisis management operations

EUSC an operational agency ...

EUSC produces GEOINT(Team of about 30 Image Analysts)

GMES Security Dimension - Policy

European Union Satellite Centre©2011

REGULATION (EU) No 911/2010

(art. 23) Security services are an important part of the GMES initiative. Europe will benefit from the use of space and in-situ assets in support of the implementation of services responding to the challenges which Europe is facing in the security field, notably border control, maritime surveillance and support to Union external actions.

GMES will contribute to serve EU security needs.

The key areas identified until now are the following:

• Support to EUROSUR (Border Surveillance)

• Support to EU External Actions (SEA)

• Maritime Surveillance

• Homeland Security

EUSC supports service development (FP7 projects).

EUSC supports GMES Security Dimension: expertise provided to GMES Bureau working groups on Security and to ESA studies related to the S of GMES.

GMES Security Dimension - Policy



GMES Activations (SAFER/GMOSAIC)


Haiti

Chile

TunisMadeira

Nairobi

KampalaBosasso

Algiers

Moldova

EgyptLibya

Nicaragua

Lorca

Somalia

Syria

BratislavaTarnobrzeg

Sana’a

Mogadishu

Goma



GMES G-MOSAIC Rapid Geospatial Reporting – Libya // IN SYNERGY WITH SAFER

EU CARPATHEX 2011 – EUSC Participation (including on field support)


Evacuation Maps (Color and B&W): Evacuation Planning

3 Evacuation Routes Maps 2 Time accessibility analysis

Briefing Notes: 1 Evacuation Plan 1 Hazardous materials analysis

• User: Space Research Centre PAS, CIK Date of Request: 27/07/2011

GMES Security Dimension


The Situation today.

Industry developed useful pre-operational services in FP7 projects, GMES BUREAU is working on the definition of GMES Services in support to

Security, ESA is working on Space Component related issues (ground stations, etc)

Emergency services are starting initial operations with a rather clear “governance” including coordination of user’s requests, management of quota, authorised users, etc.

The challenges for a sustainable GMES Security Dimension

Need of sustainable financial resources (e.g. discussion on MFF) Further develop the services (4 projects funded by FP7 to start in 2012/13) Data security policy (more sensitive for services dedicated to security) The governance: - structured dialog between EEAS/DG ENTR/ESA/EDA/EUSC - BRIDGES project (Fp7 CSA funded by the EC) supports the Commission



BRIDGES (CSA on GMES Security Dimension) BRIDGES (CSA on GMES Security Dimension)

Study of several models of governance for sustainable services addressing the Security Dimension of GMES, including technical, financial and legal implications.

Duration: 2 YearsBudget: 1 M€



BRIDGES: Support for the work on the governanceBRIDGES: Support for the work on the governance

GOVERNANCE …

1 – Governance relates to consistent management, cohesive policies, guidance, processes and decision-rights for a given area of responsibility.

A fair governance implies that mechanisms function in a way that allows the executives (the "agents") to respect the rights and interests of the stakeholders (the "principals"), in a spirit of democracy.(source Wikipedia)

2 – The BRIDGES project will propose in a constant dialogue with Stakeholders (respecting their rights and interests) sustainable Governance scenarios for the GMES Security Dimension.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_governance

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_governance

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stakeholder_(corporate)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy

BRIDGES: PHASE 1 – Analysis of current situation


Analysis of relevant existing governance models in the Space and non-Space domain

(e.g. Galileo, ORFEO, TerraSAR-X, GMES Emergency, EMSA, etc.)

Background and operational Service Delivery scenarios (experience of Industry and previous FP7 projects)

The role that the EUSC may play in GMES Security dimension as a facilitator is a variable to take into consideration (e.g. Technical coordination of the services provided by the Industry for the S of GMES is foreseen as well as quality control, validation (certification) and user’s interface.)

BRIDGES: PHASE 2 – Definition of scenarios


Definition of Scenarios of governance for GMES Security dimension:

Support to EU External Action

Border Surveillance Mainly a description of the current status (EUROSUR driven)

Maritime Surveillance

BRIDGES: PHASE 3 – Impact analysis


Impact Analysis:

Legal and Financial implications

Technical Implementation

Cost-Benefit Analysis

All this based on a constant dialogue with the stakeholders: Users, Institutional and Industry.

BRIDGES


Institutional Advisory Board

Industrial ForumUser Committee

Phase 3

Legal Analysis

Technical Implementation

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Scenarios of Governance

Phase 2

Operational service delivery options

Phase 1

Analysis of the applicability of

existing governance models in the field of Space

Stakeholders:MSs, EEAS, EC, ESA, EDA, ISS, etc.



Roadmap and ConclusionsRoadmap and Conclusions

GIO (GMES Initial Operations)

GMES Operations

2009

GMES Pre-operational Services

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

SECURITYEXTERNAL ACTIONSGMOSAIC

BRIDGES - GOVERNANCE

POST - GMOSAIC

EMERGENCYSAFER GIO EMERGENCY RESPONSE

BRIDGES IS OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE TO bring all the work already done by the EUSC and other stakeholder in the Security Dimension of GMES to the operational status in 2014

The definition of the role of the EUSC is fundamental for ensuring an efficient use of an existing operational agency with a long-lasting experience with users needs.

unclassified / for official use only european union satellite centre © 2012 european union...

Documents