UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK

2020/21

2

Contents

1 Welcome to IATL .................................................................................................................................. 4

2 What is Interdisciplinary learning? ...................................................................................................... 4

3 Why take an Interdisciplinary module? ............................................................................................... 4

4 What does Interdisciplinarity mean? ................................................................................................... 5

5 SEMINAR TIMES and LOCATIONS 2020/21 .......................................................................................... 7

6 Attendance ........................................................................................................................................... 8

6.1 Absence from Seminar Policy ...................................................................................................... 8

6.2 Reading Week .............................................................................................................................. 8

7 Assessment .......................................................................................................................................... 9

7.1 IATL Assessment Strategy ............................................................................................................ 9

7.2 Examinations .............................................................................................................................. 10

7.3 Examination Feedback ............................................................................................................... 10

7.4 Essays ......................................................................................................................................... 10

7.5 Style and Presentation Guidelines ............................................................................................. 10

7.6 Bibliography, Footnotes and Endnotes ...................................................................................... 11

7.7 Portfolios .................................................................................................................................... 11

7.8 Reflective Journals ..................................................................................................................... 11

7.9 Word Limits ................................................................................................................................ 12

8 Submission ......................................................................................................................................... 13

9 Extensions .......................................................................................................................................... 13

10 Return of Assessed work ................................................................................................................ 13

11 IATL Feedback Strategy .................................................................................................................. 14

12 Briefing Note for Students on the 20 Point Marking Scale ............................................................ 15

13 CATS Points .................................................................................................................................... 16

14 Mitigating Circumstances .............................................................................................................. 16

15 Cheating ......................................................................................................................................... 17

16 Plagiarism ....................................................................................................................................... 17

17 Health and Safety Policy ................................................................................................................ 18

17.1 Fire Evacuation ........................................................................................................................... 18

17.2 First Aid ...................................................................................................................................... 18

17.3 Security ...................................................................................................................................... 18

18 Sexual and Racial Harassment ....................................................................................................... 18

19 Equality .......................................................................................................................................... 19

3

20 Other Policies and Regulations ...................................................................................................... 19

Appendix 1 ................................................................................................................................................... 2

Appendix 2 ................................................................................................................................................... 3

Appendix 3 ................................................................................................................................................... 4

IATL Research Ethics Sub-Committee ...................................................................................................... 4

4

1 Welcome to IATL

We’re pleased you’ve chosen to study with IATL. This handbook aims to offer guidance, advice and policy

to students working on IATL modules in terms of assessment, attendance, and the relationship of the

work students do with us to their home Department.

IATL hosts a number of cross-faculty modules. Second, third and fourth-year undergraduates from across

the University faculties are able to work together on one or more of IATL's interdisciplinary modules.

These modules are designed to help you grasp abstract and complex ideas from a range of subjects, to

synthesise these into a rounded intellectual and creative response, to understand the symbiotic potential

of traditionally distinct disciplines, and to stimulate collaboration through group work and embodied

learning.

2 What is Interdisciplinary learning?

“When intellectuality is premised on rediscovery and rethinking, resocialisation and reintellectualisation,

interdisciplinarity becomes not just a way of doing things but a new way of knowing”

Klein, J. T. (1996) Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities and Interdisciplinarities. London:

University Press of Virginia. P15

Interdisciplinary study will benefit you in your time at Warwick and beyond by broadening your

educational horizons, encouraging you to step outside of your comfort zone, and supporting you in

working with students and staff from disciplines other than your own.

3 Why take an Interdisciplinary module?

Excitement: Many academics and administrators in universities see interdisciplinarity as the future.

Single disciplinary knowledge is a necessary but no longer sufficient means of addressing the major issues

that confront what is an increasingly globalised world, the complexities of which militate against a single

angle or focus. Each of IATL’s module tutors is invested in this idea, and committed to the idea of problem-

based learning.

“I have really enjoyed the module! It was great learning about something that was so different to my

course, and something I am really interested in. I feel like our group worked through a lot of interesting

topics and came up with some great points that I will be able to use in my future learning.”

Enrichment: Which tools do we need to reinvent education or apply our imaginations to the challenges

that face us? Can we ever obtain freedom of expression? How do we maintain wellbeing in a modern

westernised society? What are the ethical, social and political implications of scientific developments in

the field of genetics? How can you apply the theoretical knowledge from your degree to practical, real

world problems in communities?

Employment: By engaging with these and other issues you are shaping not only your own future, but that

of society more broadly. Crucially, also, you are making yourself more employable. Interdisciplinary

modules require, by their very nature, a number of the key skills the CBI identify as vital in graduate

employability, including 'the ability to use and assimilate knowledge ... research skills, complex problem-

solving skills and analysis.'

Enjoyment: There is no better way to mix with fellow students from different disciplines in and academic

environment. Learn new things, new ways of thinking and researching, share your own insights and

knowledge.

5

4 What does Interdisciplinarity mean?

Although interdisciplinarity can be defined in theoretical terms, there is great variation in how individuals

interpret it and how it is formulated in practice. “Interdisciplinarity has been variously defined in this

century: as a methodology, a concept, a process, a way of thinking, a philosophy, and a reflexive

ideology… Interdisciplinarity is a means of solving problems and answering questions that cannot be

satisfactorily addressed using single methods or approaches” (Klein 1990: 196). At IATL we define

multidisciplinarity as the encounter with knowledge sets, methodologies and skills from more than one

established academic discipline. Interdisciplinarity combines this with reflection on the relationships

between the sets of knowledges, skills and methodologies explored, and transdiciplinarity begins the

process of synthesis between these elements as, driven by the study of a particular problem, normally

stable boundaries are transgressed. We do not always reach the transdisciplinary stage, but we always

seek to move in that direction.

On these modules you will, therefore, do the following:

• Develop conceptual links using a perspective in one discipline to modify a perspective in another;

• Recognize a new level of organization with its own processes in order to solve unsolved problems within

existing disciplines or problems that lie beyond the scope of any one discipline;

• Use research techniques developed in one discipline to elaborate a theoretical model in another;

• Modify and extend a theoretical framework from one domain to apply in another;

• Develop a new theoretical framework that may reconceptualize research in separate domains as it

attempts to integrate them;

• Address broad issues and/or complex questions spanning more than one disciplinary field.

(Bechtel 1986 46-7; Klein 1990 11).

6

IATL STAFF CONTACT DETAILS

Professor Jonathan Heron Email: Jonathan.Heron@warwick.ac.uk

Director of IATL & Head of Department Tel: 024 761 50530

Jo Wale Email: J.R.Wale@warwick.ac.uk

Academic Manager & Deputy Director Tel: 024 765 75124

Caroline Gibson Email: C.A.L.Gibson@warwick.ac.uk

Academic Manager & Deputy Director Tel: 024 761 50067

Dr Elena Riva Email: E.Riva@warwick.ac.uk

Associate Professor & Director of Studies Tel: 024 761 50531

Naomi de la Tour Email: Naomi.de-la-tour@warwick.ac.uk

Senior Teaching Fellow Tel: 024 765 73591

Dr Heather Meyer Email: Heather.Meyer@warwick.ac.uk

Teaching Fellow Tel: 024 765 73564

Angela Ward Email: A.Ward.5@warwick.ac.uk

Interdisciplinary Modules Officer Tel: 024 765 22813

Tayyba Qayyum Email: tayyba.qayyum@warwick.ac.uk

Office Manager Tel: 024 761 73563

Greta Radzeviciute Email: g.radzeviciute@warwick.ac.uk

Projects Officer

Bendik Andersen Email: bendik.anderson@warwick.ac.uk

Technology Officer Tel: 024 765 73592

Emma Barker Email: E.Barker@warwick.ac.uk

Journal and Conferences Manager Tel: 024 765 75125

Fiona O’Brien Email: F.O-Brien@warwick.ac.uk

Journal and Conferences Coordinator

Email

IATL will use your @warwick email address for all correspondence.

WHERE ARE WE?

Second Floor, Senate House - General Office: Room SH2.01

*** Please note that access to the office will be limited, so contact staff via email

in the first instance ***

7

5 SEMINAR TIMES and LOCATIONS 2020/21 AUTUMN TERM 2020

IL001/IL101 Forms of Identity

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment: - A

Thursdays 10.00 -12.00

Venue: R2.41 Ramphal Building

IL002/IL102 Navigating Psychopathology

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment: - A

Tuesdays 14.00-16.00 (ALSO available in Spring term)

Venue: R0.12, Ramphal Building

IL008/IL108 Reinventing Education

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment: -A

Mondays 10.00-12.00 (ALSO available in Spring term)

Venue: A0.03 Social Sciences Building

IL018 Censorship and Society

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment A

Wednesdays

Venue: A0.03 Social Sciences Building

IL020 Entrepreneurship: A Critical Perspective

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment: -A

Thursdays 14.00 -16.00

Venue: R2.41 Ramphal Building

IL028 Understanding Wellbeing

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment: A

TUesdays 10.00-12.00

Venue: R2.41 Ramphal Building

IL032 Change: Critical Understandings, Practices and Action

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment: A

Tuesdays 17.00-19.00

Venue: R0.12, Ramphal Building

IL033 Feminist Dissent: Theory, Practice and Resistance

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment: A

Mondays 12.00-14.00

Venue: R0.12, Ramphal Building

IL038/IL136 Public Engagement

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment: A

Wednesdays 10:00 – 12:00

Venue: A0.03 Social Sciences Building

SPRING TERM 2019

IL002 Navigating Psychopathology

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment: - A

Tuesdays 14.00-16.00 (ALSO available in Autumn term)

Venue: R0.12, Ramphal Building

IL005/IL105 Applied Imagination: Theory and Practice

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment: - A

Tuesdays 10:00 – 13:00

Venue:

IL008 Reinventing Education

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment: -A

Mondays 14.00-16.00 (ALSO available in Autumn term)

Venue:

IL014/IL114 Global Connections: Understanding Global

Literacy

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment: -A

Wednesdays 09.00 – 11.00

Venue: R0.12, Ramphal Building

IL023 Genetics, Science & Society

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment A

Fridays 10.00-12.00

Venue:

IL029 An Introduction to Design Thinking Theory and

Practice

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment A

Fridays 10.00 – 13:00

Venue:

IL031 Serious Tabletop Game Design and Development

CATS 12 or 15

Assessment A

Thursdays 14:00 – 16:00

Venue:

8

Please check the module webpages to ensure that no changes have been made to times and teaching

locations.

To locate the teaching spaces for your module, please type the name or number of the room into this

webpage: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/about/visiting/maps/interactive

Module Assessment types

A = 100% Assessed B = 100% Examined

C = 50% Assessed/50% Examined D=60% Examined/40% Assessed

6 Attendance

6.1 Absence from Seminar Policy

Attendance at small and large classes is a course requirement. If you cannot attend a seminar group

please let the module leader know in advance. If you have not been able to warn about your absence in

advance then you should let the module leader know why as soon as possible afterwards. Attendance at

each small group class will be recorded. If you miss classes often the module leader may ask you why; and

you may then be required to produce additional work. As an ultimate sanction there is a University

procedure for terminating your registration if you fail to do the work your home department expects of

you. (See Regulation 36 published as part of the University Calendar on the University website).

Please refer to your home department’s handbook for information on their attendance monitoring policy.

Please note also that the University is required to monitor attendance in line with immigration legislation

and regulatory requirements.

6.2 Reading Week

Many IATL modules do not have a reading week. Please check your module webpage to see if your

module does. If there is a reading week it will usually take place during week six of the autumn and spring

terms. It means that there are no lectures, seminars or tutorials that week. This is intended to allow you

to consolidate your work and prepare material for the second half of term.

Please check whether your tutor holds office hours during reading week.

9

7 Assessment

There are a variety of forms of assessment on IATL modules. Please see your individual module webpages

for more details on how you will be assessed for the modules you have selected.

The deadlines for assessment can be found on module webpages.

Please note that in the event that you have submitted assessment worth more than 10% of the module,

we are required to follow University regulations which state that you must finish the module:

“Where departments permit students to register for more modules than required, and subsequently de-

register from some of those modules, students may not de-register from a module after a significant

proportion (more than 10%) of the assessment has been undertaken (Senate 93(d)/07-08; AQSC 124/14-

15))”

7.1 IATL Assessment Strategy

IATL is fully committed to the University’s Assessment Strategy and, in particular, to the University’s desire

to:

encourage your active engagement of students in your own learning;

provide assessments that are accessible and inclusive (regardless of which faculty you are from

and the focus of the interdisciplinary module);

IATL uses a number of different method of assessments. The list below is not exhaustive and, indeed, our

strategy is to create and develop new methods of assessment to test your understanding and to suit the

learning outcomes of the module:

1) Assessed essays provide you with an opportunity to display a command of analysis and research, and

an ability to collect and organise evidence.

2) Oral presentations test your ability to synthesise visual images and theoretical material and to

communicate these clearly, and to stimulate discussion.

3) Examinations test your understanding of issues and coverage of the syllabus, as well as your ability

to write concisely.

4) Reflective Journals provide you with an opportunity to reflect upon your learning experience and to

engage critically and analytically with your journey. The reflective journals test your ability to be

analytical rather than descriptive, selective rather than comprehensive, and to support your personal

reflections by using evidence and references to wider reading.

5) Blogs enhance your engagement in participative and collaborative learning. In addition, blogs

facilitate your learning towards key assessable learning outcomes, including academic literacy and

digital literacy skills.

6) Student-devised Assessments/Practical Projects offer an opportunity for you to work in

collaboration with your tutor and to create a piece of work that offers a solution to a controversial

topic or question that has interested you during the module. You are encouraged to undertake your

own research utilising methodologies presented during the module.

7) Peer Assessment engages you in providing feedback to your peers and is a powerful technique for

facilitating better understanding of the assessment criteria, transferring a degree of ownership of the

assessment process, and increasing motivation. It encourages you to learn more deeply and gain an

insight into your own approach in comparison to your peers, and aids your development of self-

awareness, judgement, and critical thinking skills.

10

7.2 Examinations

There is no set examination period. Examination dates vary from module to module. Some IATL modules

taught only in the autumn term, for example, may have their examination at the end of that term. If this

is the case then you will be informed by the module tutor during the first class. Most examinations will

be invigilated unseen papers; however a few modules opt for a seen paper. Details of these will be given

to you by the tutor. Seen exam papers will be available 21 days before the examination. Papers will be

distributed by module leaders.

Rubrics for examinations will be supplied by module leaders. Please note: You will be penalised up to 20

marks from your overall exam mark if it is evident that you are in violation of the rubric of the exam paper.

For details of Materials Allowed in Examinations, please refer to the Regulation A, which can be found in

the University's Senate Examination and Degree Conventions.

Past examination papers are available on the University's past papers page.

7.3 Examination Feedback

IATL does not return examination scripts to students. However, generic exam feedback will be provided.

7.4 Essays

You will be very likely to be required to write essays on IATL modules. Most essays will be assessed (or

summative) pieces of work, with marks counting towards your final grade. Essays are important as they

help you to develop your skills and improve your performance. Advice on writing essays can be obtained

via the Academic Writing Programme where workshops, mentoring and an online course are on offer to

Undergraduate students. (http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/scs/skills/awp/).

7.5 Style and Presentation Guidelines

Essays can be written in the style that your Department favours. English and Comparative Literary Studies

use, for example, either MLA (Modern Languages Association) conventions or the MHRA (Modern

Humanities Research Association) referencing conventions whilst Life Sciences, for instance, employ the

Vancouver style of referencing. Be self-consistent and use the same system throughout the piece of work

being submitted. The Library provides some guidance on referencing: warwick.ac.uk/refwise

Handwritten assignments cannot be accepted. Computers for students' use are available in the work

areas in the Library and the Learning Grid. You are required to keep a back-up of your work and an

electronic copy of any assignments you submit to the department. In the event of computer problems,

please contact the IT Services Helpdesk on ext. 73737.

Please Note: Computer problems are not an acceptable reason for non/late submission of assessed work.

Extra-Curricular commitments are not valid reasons for requesting an extension to an assessed essay

deadline.

You should observe the following presentation guidelines for all essays:

Line spacing should be 1.5 or double,

Use 12-point type, a clear font and wide margins for tutor comments

Your Student ID number should be included in the header or footer on each page of your essay.

YOUR NAME SHOULD NOT APPEAR ON THE PAGES OF THE ESSAY.

11

7.6 Bibliography, Footnotes and Endnotes

All assessed essays and dissertations should have a bibliography of works consulted and cited. There

should be correct and full referencing of sources either as in-text citation, as footnotes or as endnotes.

The purpose of these references is:

To document direct quotation

To credit ideas taken from a primary or secondary source (including single words, phrases and

paraphrases)

To give your reader sufficient information to track your quotation back to its source and to locate

its full text.

You may use the referencing style of your home department but bear in mind that the key essentials of

all citations are: clarity, brevity, consistency and completeness.

7.7 Portfolios

A portfolio is a series of shorter pieces of work written for assessment. In terms of submission and marking

they are treated in exactly the same way as essays (see above).

7.8 Reflective Journals

What is a reflective journal?

A reflective journal is an account of your work in progress, but more essentially an opportunity for

reflection on the learning experience. It should provide you with a means of engaging critically and

analytically with the journey made in planning and the delivery of the final assessed workshop. For

example, did you experience something in one of the seminars and then try it out?

What does a reflective journal look like?

There is no right or wrong way of presenting your journal, as this should take account of personal

experience, preferred learning style and your independent research focus. Some journals are electronic

(more like video or written blogs), and some take a diary form with visual and written material cut and

pasted (literally) into 'scrapbooks'.

You should however:

Write in the first person.

Be mindful that this journal is a public document and therefore it is important to consider the

reader as you write. They were not with you on this learning journey so some context is

important.

Content is more important than presentation.

Process and immediacy are the key words.

Your journal will be enhanced by evidence of:

Progression through a learning journey.

Evaluation of new approaches experienced in the period of independent study.

Teasing out assumptions underpinning practice

Critical evaluation of your own practice.

Analysis of key or 'critical' moments from independent study, whether positive or negative, and

what was learnt from them.

Sensitivity to relationships with other members of the group.

Taking a position and making an argument from your learning experience.

Relevant reading.

12

New understandings made from: reading, planning and or delivery, collaborative activities, the

exam, the viva, and the questioning of previous assumptions.

How will your reflective journal be assessed?

Ask yourself is there evidence of:

Effective organisation and presentation of material and or evidence.

Academic reading used in a relevant way to inform, support and or shape your reflections.

Critical engagement with, rather than description of, the creation of your piece, or of the term's

work; your own process; and the process of others.

Evaluation of the limitations/potential of the work undertaken.

Immediacy – did you reflect every time you met for discussions/rehearsals; or after each seminar?

The 20-point scale criteria will broadly apply. Please see below.

A very good journal will be analytical rather than descriptive; selective rather than comprehensive; based

in evidence and references to wider reading; critical and cautious in the claims made; personal but not

rhetorical.

7.9 Word Limits

The permitted word limit for your assessments includes quotations and excludes footnotes, endnotes and

the bibliography. Tutors will allow a discretionary 10% extension of the word length, however, they will

not take into account anything which is written after the 10% extension. This could have severe

repercussions on your mark, as your concluding paragraphs will not be read, so please make sure that

your work does not exceed the maximum word length allowed. If your work does exceed the maximum

word length allowed, the following penalties will be applied:

10-15% over - 5 points will be deducted from the mark for the essay

15-50% over - 10 points will be deducted from the mark for the essay

More than 50% over - 20 points will be deducted from the mark for the essay

Please note that if your work is significantly under the required length it is unlikely to meet

the rubric for the assignment which is likely to have a consequential negative impact upon

the mark awarded.

13

8 Submission

Assessments must be submitted electronically via the Tabula Coursework Management system in .doc,

.docx or pdf format by the stipulated deadline. Submission of a hard copy of your essay is not required.

Please ensure that you attach the IATL cover sheet to your assessment when you submit. This can be

found on the IATL website and is also provided in Appendix A of this handbook for reference purposes

(http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/activities/modules/ugmodules)

Please also ensure that your student number is in the header of your assignment but not your name. This

is to ensure anonymity.

For some assessments (such as a reflective journal or a student devised project) a hard copy may be

submitted where an electronic copy is not appropriate or feasible. Hard-copy submissions must be made

by 12 noon to the IATL offices (SH2.01 Senate House). A cover sheet must be attached, which is available

both online and from the IATL offices. In addition, an electronic copy of the cover sheet must be submitted

to Tabula stating that a hard copy of the assignment has been submitted to the IATL office.). This is to

prevent Tabula inadvertently awarding penalties for late submission.

(http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/activities/modules/ugmodules)

9 Extensions

Students are expected to plan their schedules allowing for the possibilities of minor disruptions in the

writing period. Extensions for summative assessed work may only be granted for serious medical issues,

or for severely difficult personal circumstances. Computer failure is not a valid reason for an extension

and students are encouraged to back up their work regularly, and on an external or virtual device.

All extension requests need to be supported by medical, counselling, or other appropriate evidence.

Requests for extensions must be applied for via Tabula: https://tabula.warwick.ac.uk/coursework/.

Extensions are only granted if applied for in advance of the deadline.

5 PERCENTAGE POINTS (EXCLUDING WEEKENDS, PUBLIC HOLIDAYS AND UNIVERSITY CLOSURE DAYS)

WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM LATE ASSESSMENTS WHERE AN EXTENSION HAS NOT BEEN GRANTED. For

example, a late piece of work that would have scored 65% had it been handed in on time would be

awarded 60 if it were one day late, 55 if two days late etc.

10 Return of Assessed work

The department aims to return feedback and provisional marks to students four weeks or 20 working

days after submission. The department has in place a comprehensive process for marking and moderating

(both internally and externally) work submitted for assessment.

We will not normally return copies of assessed work to you. It is therefore essential that you keep your

own copy for future reference.

All marks are provisional until they are approved by the IATL Board of Examiners, which meets in June,

and may be subject to change.

14

11 IATL Feedback Strategy

IATL is fully committed to the University’s Feedback Strategy and Good Practice, recognising that feedback

is a crucial tool for ‘providing the appropriate support for students to fulfil their potential while at

Warwick, as this forms an essential component of the learning experience.’

There is considerable variety in the ways in which the outcomes and implications of performance in

assessments can be communicated to you:

Written feedback (i.e. assessment’s cover sheets, notes on the text of the essays/exam/project sheet, notes on Tabula, emailed feedback)

Oral feedback (i.e. comments in seminars, discussions with tutors to help you develop your knowledge and skills, feedback captured with recording device, etc.)

Visual feedback (i.e. video recording)

Peer-feedback

Self-generated feedback

It is important to note that verbal, email, audio, peer and self-generated feedback are as important as

written comments on your essays/exams/projects.

You will be informed at the start of their course: • How your work will be assessed • How assessment results will be communicated • What format of ongoing feedback and final assessment feedback you may expect • The extent of assessment feedback you may expect (which may take the form of a word-limit

range, and may vary for different types of assessment) • An agreed timeframe for the submission of assessed work and the provision of feedback, both

throughout the academic year, and in individual instances • Details of the assessment criteria and learning outcomes for the module/course and information

on whether and how assessment feedback will be related to these criteria and outcomes • Whether you will be expected to reflect on your own performance either informally, for example,

in the context of personal development planning, or formally, through jointly planned and executed assignments or presentations

• That your first mark for summative assessments is provisional until its verification by the second marker and by the Board of Examiners

Completing the cycle of learning, assessment and assessment feedback is important in the creation of an

integrated student academic experience. Assessment feedback should identify further actions to be

taken by you to develop your knowledge and learning abilities, such as improving your revision skills,

undertaking more in-depth reading on a particular topic, or developing a certain practice or skill (i.e.

communication skill). The feedback process will also provide an opportunity for you to work towards a

set of goals, with the aim of improving your learning and personal skills and your performance in the next

round of assessment.

15

12 Briefing Note for Students on the 20 Point Marking Scale

Your work will be marked using the University's 20 point marking scale.

This scale has 20 mark (or grade) points on it; each of which falls into one of the five classes of

performance which correspond to the overall degree classification. The University uses these classes of

performance for all of its undergraduate modules:

70-100 First Class

60-69 Second Class, Upper Division (also referred to as "Upper Second" or "2.1")

50-59 Second Class, Lower Division (also referred to as "Lower Second" or "2.2")

40-49 Third Class

0-39 Fail

The University has generic descriptors for work which is given a mark that falls within the range(s) of

marks in each to the class. So, there is a description for work in the Upper Second class range, another for

work in the Lower Second class range etc. The mark which each piece of your work will be given is

dependent upon the extent to which the work satisfies the elements in the generic descriptors.

For the purposes of the 20 point mark scale, each of the five classes is further subdivided into the positions

shown in the table below (high 2.1, mid 2.1 etc). One of the 20 mark points is assigned to each of the

subdivisions. The person marking your work will consider your work alongside the generic criteria to

decide which class of performance the work falls into. The marker will then determine the extent to which

your work meets the criteria in order to arrive at a judgment about the position (high, mid, low) within

the class. The work will be awarded the mark assigned to the relevant position in the class.

If a module has more than one "unit" (or piece) of assessment, (e.g. the assessment comprises two

assessed essays), the mark for each unit is determined using the 20 point mark scale and then the marks

are averaged, taking account of the units" respective weightings, in order to produce the module result.

This is expressed as a percentage (and therefore may be any number up to 100 and so is not limited to

one of the 20 marks on the scale). The information below shows each class of degree (including the

subdivisions) and the marks assigned to each position in the class on the 20 point mark scale, alongside

the University's generic descriptors for work in the class.

Class Scale Mark Descriptor

First

Excellent 1st

100

Work of original and exceptional quality which in the

examiners’ judgement merits special recognition by the

award of the highest possible mark.

94

Exceptional work of the highest quality, demonstrating

excellent knowledge and understanding, analysis,

organisation, accuracy, relevance, presentation and

appropriate skills. At final-year level: work may achieve or be

close to publishable standard.

High 1st 88

Very high quality work demonstrating excellent knowledge

and understanding, analysis, organisation, accuracy,

relevance, presentation and appropriate skills. Work which

may extend existing debates or interpretations.

Upper Mid 1st 82

Lower Mid 1st 78

Low 1st 74

16

Upper Second

(2.1)

High 2.1 68 High quality work demonstrating good knowledge and

understanding, analysis, organisation, accuracy, relevance,

presentation and appropriate skills.

Mid 2.1 65

Low 2.1 62

Lower Second (2.2)

High 2.2 58 Competent work, demonstrating reasonable knowledge and

understanding, some analysis, organisation, accuracy,

relevance, presentation and appropriate skills.

Mid 2.2 55

Low 2.2 52

Third

High 3rd 48

Work of limited quality, demonstrating some relevant

knowledge and understanding. Mid 3rd 45

Low 3rd 42

Fail

High Fail (sub Honours)

38

Work does not meet standards required for the appropriate

stage of an Honours degree. Evidence of study and

demonstrates some knowledge and some basic

understanding of relevant concepts and techniques, but

subject to significant omissions and errors.

Fail

32

Work is significantly below the standard required for the

appropriate stage of an Honours degree. Some evidence of

study and some knowledge and evidence of understanding

but subject to very serious omissions and errors.

25 Poor quality work well below the standards required for the

appropriate stage of an Honours degree. Low Fail 12

Zero Zero 0 Work of no merit OR Absent, work not submitted, penalty in

some misconduct cases

13 CATS Points

These work the same way in IATL as anywhere else and are directly credited to your degree.

14 Mitigating Circumstances

Extenuating or mitigating circumstances are those events which have had a detrimental effect on your

study, to the point that it is in your interest to draw your department’s attention to them and ask for

them to be considered in mitigation of poor performance. Such circumstances include (but are not

limited to) illness, both bodily and emotional; the severe illness or death of a close family member; a

shocking or traumatic personal experience. In addition, sudden, unexpected changes in family

circumstances might affect your ability to make academic progress as a consequence of their

demonstrable emotional impact upon you, and may also be considered as mitigation.

17

In order for your circumstances to be considered as mitigating by your home department, they must be

conveyed to home department. The University expects that you will alert your home department to your

circumstances before Exam Boards meet, so that they may be taken into account in good time.

If you have mitigating circumstances that you wish to declare, submit them through your personal

Tabula page https://tabula.warwick.ac.uk/profiles/view/me/personalcircs

Full instructions and a video walk through showing how to declare a mitigating circumstance on

Tabula can be viewed at:

https://warwick.ac.uk/services/its/servicessupport/web/tabula/manual/cm2/mit-circs/declare

15 Cheating

It is critical that every piece of work that you submit is your own work. Cheating in a University test, which

includes assessed essays and dissertations, is not tolerated by either the University or IATL. If you do

cheat, your work may be awarded a mark of 0%. Cheating can be defined in a number of ways: the

University's regulations provide the following definition: 'In these regulations 'cheating' means an

attempt to benefit oneself, or another, by deceit or fraud. This shall include deliberately reproducing the

work of another person or persons without proper acknowledgment.' Regulation 11, University Calendar.

When you submit an assessed essay you must sign the following declaration on the cover sheet: "I am

aware of the Department's notes on plagiarism and of Regulation 11B in the University Calendar

concerning cheating in a University test. The attached work submitted for a University test is my own." If

it is subsequently found that the work is not your own or that you have not accurately acknowledged any

sources, you risk being awarded a mark of 0%.

For further information on the procedure followed in the event that a student is suspected of cheating in

an examination or plagiarising an assignment, please see Regulation 11 in the University Calendar (link

provided in section 19).

16 Plagiarism

What is it?

It is a form of cheating. It is the use of another person's work without acknowledgement. It may include

direct transcriptions of text or the presentation of ideas from a source as your own. You must always

acknowledge your sources, making appropriate use of citation and bibliographies.

Quotations must always be acknowledged with a specific page reference every time they occur.

Direct quotations must be placed in quotation marks.

An idea taken from a secondary source must be given a detailed reference.

It is not acceptable to just cite a source in the bibliography; if you are using quotations or ideas from a

specific source you must cite the reference accurately.

What could happen?

If a tutor suspects plagiarism they will notify the Head of Department. Having examined the work, the

Director of IATL may impose a mark of 0%. If this happens, it can have serious consequences for your

work: most essays count for 50% of your module mark. If you are a second-year or third-year student

your case may be considered by a Senate Disciplinary Committee. If plagiarism is detected in one essay,

18

all other essays may be re-examined for evidence of plagiarism. The University has a range of plagiarism

software that can be used to do this.

How to avoid it

Very few students are deliberately dishonest, but poor scholarly practice can lead them to commit

plagiarism. You should always provide appropriate references. Whilst it is important to engage with other

people's ideas, you must credit their work. Sources that need citing include on-line sources. If you consult

the internet you need to provide the URL and state the date on which you accessed it.

Advice on good scholarly practice can be found in most books on academic writing. Alternatively, consult

the University’s plagiarism tutorial on Moodle: Avoiding Plagiarism

17 Health and Safety Policy

The Institute for Advanced Teaching and Learning (IATL) takes seriously its provision for the safety and

welfare of its students.

17.1 Fire Evacuation

In the case of a fire alarm, you are expected to leave the building quickly and quietly. Failure to evacuate

the building during a fire alarm may lead to disciplinary action.

If you have a disability that may impede your evacuation from the building you can request that IATL's

Health and Safety Officer prepares a personalised evacuation plan for you.

In the event of fire, raise the alarm as quickly as possible and move to safety.

17.2 First Aid

In the case of an accident or injury in Senate House please contact IATL's first aider, Tayyba Qayyum, who

is based in IATL General Office, SH2.01, ext. 73563.

17.3 Security

If you cannot find any of the fire officers or first aider, you should contact Security on ext. 22222.

Further details of the University's Health and Safety Policy can be found on the Health, Safety & Well-

being website.

18 Sexual and Racial Harassment

The University considers sexual or racial harassment to be totally unacceptable and offers support to staff

and students subjected to it. The University is also prepared to take disciplinary action against offenders.

Sexual harassment may be defined as verbal or physical contact of a sexual nature which the perpetrator

knows, or should have known, was offensive to the victim. Such conduct may encompass displays of

sexually suggestive pictures, unwanted demands for sex and unwanted physical contact.

Racial harassment may be defined as behaviour that is offensive or intimidating to the recipient and would

be regarded as racial harassment by any reasonable person. Such conduct may range from racist jokes

and insults to physical threats. Confidential advice is available from the Head of the Department, the

Director of Studies, the Student Counselling Service, or the Advice and Welfare Services Officer in the

Student Union. A leaflet, Sexual and Racial Harassment – Guidelines for Students, is available from the

Senior Tutor's Office, University House.

19

19 Equality

The University of Warwick strives to treat both employees and students with respect and dignity, to treat

them fairly with regards to all assessments, choices and procedures, and to give them encouragement to

reach their full potential. Therefore, the University strives to treat all its members on the basis of merit

and ability alone and aims to eliminate unjustifiable discrimination on the grounds of gender, race,

nationality, ethnic or national origin, political beliefs, religious beliefs or practices, disability, marital

status, family circumstances, sexual orientation, spent criminal convictions, age or any other

inappropriate ground.

20 Other Policies and Regulations

Our Values

Student Community

Student Feedback and Complaints

Study Hours Statement

Policy on Recording Lectures by Students

Smoking Policy

Data Protection Policy

University Calendar

Information on Examinations

Regulation 10: Examination Regulations

Regulation 11: Procedure to be Adopted in the Event of Suspected Cheating in a University Test

Regulation 23: Student Disciplinary Offences

Regulation 31: Regulations governing the use of University Computing Facilities

Regulation 36: Regulations Governing Student Registration, Attendance and Progress

2

Appendix 1 ASSESSED WORK COVER SHEET

Students should be aware that in accordance with departmental regulations they are required to retain electronic copies of all pieces of submitted assessed work until after the finals exam board of their degree. Online university

storage is available for this, and can be accessed at www.files.warwick.ac.uk.

Student ID Number: Year of Study: Module Name & Code: CATS (please select):

Module Tutor(s):

Word Count: Assignment Title: In completing details on this cover sheet and submitting the assignment, you are doing so on the basis that this assignment is all your own work and that you have not copied, borrowed or failed to acknowledge anyone else’s work. Please ‘X’ this box if you agree to this statement.

Failure to do your assessed work by the specified deadline will mean that your submission is LATE. Please remember that you MUST print out the electronic receipt you will receive for your online essay submission, and keep for reference.

7.5 CATS 12 CATS 15 CATS

3

Appendix 2

MARKSHEET AND FEEDBACK FORM

First Marker: Second Marker: Final Agreed Mark: Feedback1:

1 Please note that some markers may leave their feedback on Tabula rather than on the cover sheet.

4

Appendix 3

IATL Research Ethics Sub-Committee

How to apply/What to submit/Review Process

While the majority of research completed in the Institute does not need ethical approval, occasionally

research does require the involvement of human participants, through methods such as surveys,

interviews and focus groups, to collect pertinent information from different groups of people. In order to

streamline processes and reduce the need to refer all applications to HSSREC, HSSREC has granted the

Institute the right to set up a sub-committee to consider such applications for research undertaken by

Undergraduate, Postgraduate Taught, or Postgraduate Research Students. Staff research must be

approved by HSSREC.

Who to apply to for REC approval

In line with University Regulation, REC approval is required for all research at the Institute that involves

human participants and their data. The overview below sets out which REC needs to be approached,

depending on the nature and scope of the research:

Institute for Advanced Teaching and Learning (IATL) REC sub-committee:

If the project is low risk, i.e. it involves adult participants who can provide informed consent. Projects

involving the collection of personal data need to ensure that they comply with the Data Protection Act

and follow University of Warwick procedures for the secure storage of these data.

HSSREC: Any applications which fall into the following categories will be referred directly to

HSSREC:

1. The project involves vulnerable people, e.g. children and young people, those with a learning

disability or cognitive impairment, or individuals in a dependent or unequal relationship

2. If the project involves sensitive topics or potentially offensive material (e.g. sexual behaviour,

participants’ illegal or political behaviour, their experience of violence, their abuse or exploitation,

their mental health, or their gender or ethnic status)

3. If the research poses significant risk to the researcher or the participant (e.g. involving one-to-one

interviews without other people in the nearby vicinity)

4. Research which will be conducted overseas in a country deemed to be high-risk.

In cases where the student is jointly supervised with another Institution, if ethical approval has been

granted by another institution’s ethics committee it should not be necessary to submit the study for

approval at the University of Warwick. However, we will request copies of the approval granted before

the research commences.

How to apply for ethical approval

• The application process starts as soon as the research project has been identified.

• The application will be submitted by the student in consultation with their supervisor/ module

convenor.

• Research ethics applications of undergraduate students, postgraduate taught or research students will

be reviewed by the IATL Ethics Officer.

5

• Students and Supervisors/Module Convenors are advised to read the Guidelines of HSSREC before

completing the application form.

• Students should also complete the online Epigeum training before beginning their research.

What to submit to the sub-committee

The documents to be submitted are the same as those required for HSSREC approval:

Application form (asking for general information, project details, information about participants,

data, publications, further information and signatures of both student and supervisor)

Participant information sheet (including details about the complaints procedure and the

University of Warwick’s minimum of 10-year data retention policy)

Consent form

Copies of any relevant authorisations

Recruitment material (posters, copy of letters or emails to recruit participants, etc.)

NB: If research is to be conducted overseas, a copy of the Information sheet and Consent form

should also be submitted in the research participants’ first language.

All the required forms can be found at https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/study/ethics/

Further information and guidelines, can be accessed on the HSSREC webpage.

How to submit documents

Applications to the sub-committee should be sent to via email to iatl.modules@warwick.ac.uk, specifying

in the Subject of your email that it is a submission for Ethical approval.

The Institute administrator will forward them to the sub-committee members and keep copies of the

applications on the Institute shared drive.

Review process

The members of the sub-committee will discuss the application and decide as follows, usually within a 2

week period:

Approved – no amendment

Conditionally Approved – minor amendments required

Resubmit – needs to be resubmitted with substantial amendments

Rejected – ethically unsound.

Referred to HSSREC (cases deemed to carry a high risk to either the student and/or participants)

The applicant will be informed by the Institute administrator about the decision via email.

Applicants have a right to appeal the Committee’s decision to reject an application. The appeal process is

carried out by the Humanities & Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (HSSREC).

Changes to research projects after approval has been given

The Sub-committee’s approval must be sought for any substantial change made to a project. If you are in

any doubt about whether the change you are making is sufficiently substantial to require further ethics

committee review please contact the Director of Research in the first instance.

Examples of substantial changes that would require the Committee’s approval include those relating to:

6

recruitment strategies

rewording of any documentation including letters or information sheets

The Committee and Chair’s action

Composition of Sub-Committee:

IATL Ethics Officer and Director of Studies

Two IATL Module Convenors

Two IATL Teaching Fellows

All committee members will have completed the relevant training prior to any reviews being

conducted.

Chair’s Action may be taken (with the advice of other Committee members if appropriate) to:

determine whether or not an application falls within the remit of the Committee;

confirm the approval of conditionally-approved protocols when the conditions have been met;

approve protocol amendments which are typographical corrections, minor redrafting or

administrative points;

note correspondence received for information only.

Accountability

The IATL sub-committee is accountable to HSSREC, which is itself accountable to the University's Research

Governance and Ethics Committee and is required to report regularly to the University through this

Committee. The sub-committee will provide internal reports to HSSREC to feed into HSSREC’s own

reporting requirements, as required by HSSREC.

A log of all applications will be kept, including the following headings:

Student name and number

Level of study

Title of research project

Supervisor/Module Convenor

Application outcome (e.g. amendments required, approved – no amendments, etc.)

Date approval granted

All paperwork for REC applications will be saved in an electronic directory, accessible to the committee

members and the administration team.

Links to the IATL Research Form, Participant information and the Consent Form can all be found at:

https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/study/ethics/