understanding depth of knowledge as it relates to unpacking the wv csos adapted from the office of...
DESCRIPTION
What is so different about these Content Standards?TRANSCRIPT
Understanding Depth of Knowledge as it Relates to Unpacking
the WV CSOs
Adapted from the Office of Instruction’s Presentations posted on Teach 21
21st Century Curriculum
Three Ways to Improve Student Learning
Raise the level of rigor in the content standards and objectives
Increase the skill and knowledge of teachers in teaching the content
Engage students in active learning designed around the standards for content, learning skills and technology tools.
What is so different about these Content Standards?
Depth of Knowledge
Level 1 – Recall, recognition. Skill a behavior or sequence of behaviors learned through practice and easily performed
Level 2 – Application of skills, concepts; conceptual understanding; procedural understanding
Level 3 – More sophisticated reasoning and analysis; students required to solve problems, draw conclusions given data, arguments, situations and other information; construct mental models translating among different representations; justifying from evidence; summarizing a body of text
Level 4 – Extended thinking; requires integration of knowledge from multiple sources and ability to represent knowledge in a variety of ways; usually requires work overa period of time
Understanding DOK
DOK is not a verb; nor is it about “difficulty”
What comes after the verb is more important than the verb itself.
“Analyze this sentence to decide if the commas have been used correctly” does not meet the criteria for high cognitive processing. The student who has been taught the rule for using commas is merely
using the rule.
Copyright © 2007 Mississippi Department of Education
Understanding DOK
Words like explain or analyze have to be considered in context. “Explain to me where you live” does not raise
the DOK of a simple rote response. Even if the student has to use addresses or
landmarks, the student is doing nothing more than recalling and reciting.
Copyright © 2007 Mississippi Department of Education
Understanding DOK
Difficulty is a reference to how many students answer a question correctly. How many of you know the definition of exaggerate? DOK 1 – recall
If all of you know the definition, this question is an easy question. How many of you know the definition of vergandoib? DOK 1 –
recall If most of you do not know the definition, this question is a difficult
question.
Copyright © 2007 Mississippi Department of Education
Same Verb – 3 DOK Levels
• DOK 3- Describe a model that you might use to represent the relationships that exist within the rock cycle. (requires deep understanding of rock cycle and a determination of how best to represent it)
• DOK 2- Describe the difference between metamorphic and igneous rocks. (requires cognitive processing to determine the differences in the two rock types)
• DOK 1- Describe three characteristics of metamorphic rocks. (simple recall)
Same verb—three DOK levels
Understanding DOK
DOK is about intended outcome, not difficultyDOK is a reference to the complexity of mental
processing that must occur to answer a question, perform a task, or generate a product. Adding is a mental process. Knowing the rule for adding is the intended outcome that influences
the DOK. Once someone learns the “rule” of how to add, 4 + 4 is DOK 1 and is
also easy. Adding 4,678,895 + 9,578,885 is still a DOK 1 but may be more
“difficult.”
Copyright © 2007 Mississippi Department of Education
RELA CSO Comparison – Grade 4
Previous PolicyRLA.4.1.11 summarize the
author’s purpose (e.g., to persuade; to inform; to determine a specific viewpoint).
Revised Policy 07/01/08
RLA.O.4.1.09 determine author’s purposes in literary and informational texts and use supporting material to justify author’s intent: To persuade To entertain To inform To determine a specific
viewpoint
Previous Policy
RLA.8.1.2 relate literary theme to global situations.
Revised Policy RLA.O.8.1.08 recognize
connections among ideas in literary and informational text (e.g. text to self, text-to-text, text to world connection) and recognize that global awareness promotes understanding, tolerance, and acceptance of ethnic, cultural, religious and personal differences.
RELA CSO Comparison – Grade 8
Science CSO Comparison – Grade
Previous Policy
AB.4.31 investigate and discuss that the number of organisms any environment can support depends on the resources available
Revised Policy 07/01/08
SC.O.B.2.18 evaluate environmental factors that affect succession, populations and communities.
Mathematics CSO Comparison Grade 3
Previous Policy
MA.3.1.6compare and order fractions with like and unlike denominators using concrete models.
Revised PolicyM.O.3.1.6create concrete models
and pictorial representations to• compare and order
fractions with like and unlike denominators,
• add and subtract fractions with like denominators,
and verify results.
Mathematics CSO Comparison Algebra
Previous Policy
AL.2.10 determine the equation of a line given a graph of a line, two points on the line, the slope and a point, and the slope and y intercept
Revised Policy
AL.2.8 extrapolate data represented by graphs, tables and formulas to make inferences and predictions on rate of change (slope) and justify when communicating results within a project-based investigation
Social Studies CSO Comparison Grade 3
Previous PolicySS.8.5.1
list reasons for exploration, routes and discoveries of major explorers on the western Virginia frontier.
SS.8.5.2
sequence the events and incentives for Virginia’s expansion west to the Ohio River.
Revised PolicySS.O.08.05.01
cite reasons for exploration, transportation routes and discoveries by major explorers and explain the sequence of events and incentives for Virginia’s expansion west to the Ohio River.
Where do we begin?
Without Clear Targets We Can’t Do Any of the Following…
Know if the assessment adequately covers and samples what we taught.
Correctly identify what students know and don’t know and their level of achievement.
Plan next steps in instruction.Give detailed, descriptive feedback to students.Have students self-assess or set goals likely to help them
learn more.Keep track of student learning target by target or standard
by standard.Complete a standards-based report card.
The UbD “Three-Circle Audit” Process http://wvde.state.wv.us/teach21
Curricular Priorities and Assessment Methods
Traditional quizzes
and tests (selected response)…….
Quizzes and tests
(constructed response)…….
Performance tasks and projects…
Performance tasks and projects
(complex, open-ended, authentic)……...
M.O.3.1.6 Create concrete models and pictorial representations to
• Compare and order fractions with like and unlike denominators,
• Add and subtract fractions with like denominators, and • Verify results.
Learning Targets
Knowledge (2 learning targets)
Comprehends Mathematics Vocabulary – fractions, like denominators, unlike denominators, add, subtract.
Demonstrates an understanding of fractions as a part of a whole/one and part of a set/group using models and pictorial representations (a partner CSO – required prior knowledge)
Reasoning (10 Learning Targets)
Compare fractions with like denominators Compare fractions with unlike denominators Verify results of ordering fractions with like denominators using concrete models Verify results of ordering fractions with like denominators using pictorial
representations Verify results of ordering fractions with unlike denominators using concrete models Verify results of ordering fractions with unlike denominators using pictorial
representations Verify results of adding fractions with like denominators using concrete models Verify results of adding fractions with like denominators using pictorial representations Verify results of subtracting fractions with like denominators using concrete models Verify results of subtracting fractions with like denominators using pictorial
representations
Performance (8 Learning Targets)
Order fractions with like denominators using concrete modelsOrder fractions with like denominators using pictorial
representationsOrder fractions with unlike denominators using concrete modelsOrder fractions with unlike denominators using pictorial
representationsAdd with like denominators using concrete modelsAdd with like denominators using pictorial modelsSubtract with like denominators using concrete modelsSubtract with like denominators using pictorial models
Product (8 Learning Targets)
Concrete Models of ordering fractions with like denominatorsConcrete Models of ordering fractions with unlike denominatorsConcrete Models of adding with like denominatorsConcrete Models of subtracting with like denominatorsPictorial Representations of ordering fractions with like
denominatorsPictorial Representations of ordering fractions with unlike
denominatorsPictorial Representations of adding with like denominatorsPictorial Representations of subtracting with like denominators
“We must be the change we wish to see in the world.”
-Ghandi
QUESTIONS?????
Monica Ann Beane, NBCT
Assistant Director, Office of Instruction
West Virginia Department of Education
304.558.5325