understanding documents: a conceptual framework professor david k. farkas puget sound chapter, stc...

61
Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 [email protected] Slides available at: http://faculty.washington.edu /farkas/framework Copyright © David K. Farkas 2004. All rights reserved.

Post on 21-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework

Professor David K. Farkas

Puget Sound Chapter, STC

October 19, [email protected] available at: http://faculty.washington.edu/farkas/framework

Copyright © David K. Farkas 2004. All rights reserved.

Page 2: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Seven Concepts Central toDesigning Documents

• Context

• Author/Intent

• Genre

• Medium

• Format

• Behaviors

• Text

Page 3: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

The Conceptual Framework

• Context

• Author/Intent

• Genre

• Medium

• Format

• Behaviors

• Text

Text

Author/ Intent

Page 4: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

The Complete Framework

Author/Intent

Page 5: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Text

BehaviorsFormat

Graphics

Multimedia

Text

Detail: The Document

Page 6: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

What is the Purpose of this Conceptual Framework?

• Clarifies relationships among key concepts.

• Provides a useful checklist (heuristic) for design and evaluation.

• Enables us to anticipate challenging or complex aspects of a design.

Page 7: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Limitations of this Framework

• It applies only to text-based documents.

Behaviors

Text

Audio

Gra

ph

ics

Mo

tion

FormatBehaviors

Format

Graphics

Multimedia

Text

Page 8: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Context

Page 9: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Defining “Context”

• Context refers to the human, social, and societal dimensions surrounding every document.

Page 10: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Context—1

• The most important context is the audience, in particular their

– Background knowledge

– Attitudes and sensibilities

– Information needs, tasks, and responsibilities

– The communication technologies they employ

Page 11: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Context—2

• Other important contexts are these:

– The organizational environment in which the document is created

– Documents related to this one

– The relevant business and regulatory environment

– The linguistic environment

Page 12: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Context Checklist

1. Are you fully aware of all the contexts relevant to the document you are creating?

Page 13: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Author/Intent

Page 14: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Defining “Author” and “Intent”

• The author is the creator of the document envisioned as a complex social agent.

• The intent is what an author and/or organization hopes to achieve by creating the document.

Page 15: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Author/Intent—1

• Authors do not pump out information. Meaning is “negotiated” through complex interactions with various contexts.

Page 16: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Author/Intent—2

• Intentions are usually complex.

– Persuade the client to renew the contract

– Gain credit within my organization

– Make sure I acknowledge what I borrowed from Susan

• All parts of the document must work together to carry out your intentions.

Page 17: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Author/Intent Checklist

1. Are your intentions realistic?

2. Are you paying attention to all relevant contexts? Are you letting their voices speak to you?

3. Do all parts of the document work together to achieve your intentions?

Page 18: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Genre

Page 19: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Defining “Genre”

• A genre is a document category.

• Every genre has (1) a particular purpose (or purposes) and (2) recognizable features.

– Is the resume a genre?

– Is the business letter a genre?

– Is the Ecommerce website a genre?

Page 20: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Genre—1

• Every document belongs to one or more genres.

• The choice of genre is largely driven by the author’s intentions. Writers begin with a genre in mind.

Page 21: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Genre—2

• Readers cannot make sense of a document without reference to its genre(s).

• Genres evolve, blend, and even fade away.

Page 22: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Genre Checklist

1. If you are genre-bending, do you understand the underlying genres?

2. If you are genre-bending, will your audience “get it” and accept it?

Page 23: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Genre bending in advertising

Page 24: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Genre bending in user assistance

Page 25: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Medium

Page 26: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Defining “Medium”

• A document’s medium is the means by which we share knowledge and experience over time and distance.

Page 27: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Media—1

• Media are defined by their

– Modes of communication (text, graphics, motion, audio)

– Features (user controls presentation, etc.)

– Underlying technology

– Business model

– Social role

Page 28: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Media—2

• A medium can communicate multiple genres.

• The same genre often crosses media.

Page 29: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Media—3

• Media evolve, compete, and take on capabilities of competing media (“convergence”).

• Older media die out very slowly—e.g., the scroll.

Page 30: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Medium Checklist

1. Are you using the most appropriate medium for your document—print vs. on-screen.

2. Are you planning to move your document across media. If so, will this work? What changes will be necessary? What will be the benefits and drawbacks?

Page 31: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Moving a genre to a new mediumwww.scottmccloud.com/comics/icst/icst-4/icst-4.html

Page 32: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Format

Page 33: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Defining “Format”

• Format refers to the use of techniques, primarily visual, that direct the user’s attention and draw distinctions.

Page 34: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Format—1

• We can distinguish between microformats and macroformats.

– Microformats are specific techniques used in many contexts, such as a hanging indent.

– Macroformats are coordinated sets of microformats.

Page 35: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Information Mapping™. A macroformat suitable for several genres in two media.

Page 36: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Format—2

• Formats very often cross media.

• Certain formats are genre specific.

• Formats evolve.

Page 37: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Evolution of birding field guides(Allen, Bateman & Delin)

Page 38: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Format Checklist

1. Is your formatting appropriate for your genre? Does it help to identify the genre?

2. Do you have enough formatting? Too much?

3. Do you really need a behavior? For example, a wizard rather than a flowchart.

Page 39: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Behaviors

Page 40: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Defining “Behaviors”

• Document behaviors are operations—primarily computer operations—that further communication.

– Hyperlinks, ALT tags

– Expanding online tables of context

– Search

– Etc.

Page 41: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Behaviors—1

• Behaviors differ in their power. For example, ALT tags vs. personalization.

• Many behaviors are analogous to formatting. For example, wizards are powerful flowcharts, expandable online TOCs are more powerful than print TOCs.

Page 42: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

A tree control TOC

Page 43: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Behaviors—2

• We can distinguish between microbehaviors and macrobehaviors.

• Some online genres are defined by macrobehaviors—e.g., CBT and online shopping sites.

• Some development tools specify macrobehaviors—Acrobat Distiller, Microsoft’s help compilers.

Page 44: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Behaviors—3

• Books have minimal behaviors.

• Certain books have special behaviors.

Page 45: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Behaviors of pop-up books

Page 46: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

MagicBook, a book with VR behaviors(Billinghurst, Kato, and Poupyrev)

Page 47: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Behaviors Checklist

1. Do the behaviors of your document fit the genre?

2. Do your behaviors have the correct functionality? Are you overpowered? Are you underpowered?

Page 48: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Do We Need This Behavior?

Many PowerPoint Decks Are Overpowered

Page 49: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Text

Page 50: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Defining “Text”

• Text is meaning encoded through written language.

Page 51: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Lessons about Text

• Text is written to carry out intentions.

• We encode meaning into a text through a vast number of rhetorical choices.

• We must consider the context, genre, medium, format, and behaviors as we create text.

• Many text-based documents include graphics and multimedia.

Page 52: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Text Checklist—1

1. Is the document’s text in the appropriate language or languages?

2. Is it linguistically competent?

3. Is it orderly and does it follow conventions?

4. Is the authorial intentions well conceived? Is there a sound strategy for achieving them?

Page 53: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Text Checklist—2

5. Does each part of the document follow the strategy?

6. Are the style and rhetorical stance appropriate?

7. Is there adequate graphical and multimedia support?

Page 54: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

What Is the Purpose of this Conceptual Framework?

Clarifies relationships among key concepts.

Provides a useful checklist (heuristic) for design and evaluation.

• Enables us to anticipate challenging or complex aspects of a design.

Page 55: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

What are the major challenges in creating these documents?

Context-sensitive help?

Crabby Office Lady articles?

Scott McCloud’s Web-based comics?

Page 56: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

The “article” genre in user assistance

Page 57: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Online comics

Page 58: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

The End

Page 59: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Reference

• Allen, Patrick, John Bateman, and Judy Delin, “Genre and Layout Design in Multimodal Documents: Towards an Empirical Account,” American Association for Artificial Intelligence Fall Symposium on Using Layout for the Generation, Analysis, or Retrieval of Documents, Cape Cod, Autumn 1999.http://www.gem.stir.ac.uk/newframe.html

Page 60: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Reference

• Billinghurst, M., Kato, H. and Poupyrev, I. (2001). The MagicBook - Moving Seamlessly between Reality and Virtuality. Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(3), 2-4.http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-2002-29/r-2002-29.pdf .

Page 61: Understanding Documents: A Conceptual Framework Professor David K. Farkas Puget Sound Chapter, STC October 19, 2004 farkas@u.washington.edu Slides available

Older media die out very slowly.

Medium