understanding fraud acct 5329 fall 2012. definition of fraud gaining an unfair advantage over...

30
Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012

Upload: benedict-brooks

Post on 23-Dec-2015

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Understanding Fraud

ACCT 5329Fall 2012

Page 2: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Definition of Fraud

Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be:1.A false statement, representation, or disclosure2.A material fact, which is something that induces a person to act3.An intent to deceive4.A justifiable reliance; that is, the person relies on the misrepresentation to take an action5.An injury or loss suffered by the victim

Page 3: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Definition of Fraud

• Acts committed on, by, or for the organization ( misappropriation, corruption, fraudulent financial statements)

• Acts are committed by an internal or external source

• Acts are intentional and concealed

Page 4: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Definition of Fraud

• Acts are illegal• Acts also cause: financial misstatement, policy

violation, ethical lapse, or a perception issue• Acts cause a loss of company funds, company

value, or any other unauthorized benefit loss (whether received personally or by others)

Page 5: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

SAS No. 99 and Fraud *

• Categories:– Asset misappropriation– Financial statement fraud– Corruption

* As amended by SAS No. 113

Page 6: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Auditor’s Responsibilities to Detect Fraud

• Understand fraud• Discuss the risk of material fraudulent

misstatements• Obtain information• Identify, assess, and respond to risks• Evaluate the results of their audit tests• Document and communicate findings• Incorporate a technology focus

Page 7: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Fraud Triangle

Pressure

RationalizationOppo

rtuni

ty

Page 8: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Premises of the Fraud Triangle

• The three elements of fraud coexist at different levels per individual

• The elements of fraud will vary based on personal circumstances

• The strength of one element may cause an individual to commit a fraudulent act

Page 9: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Premises of the Fraud Triangle

• The strength of one element may eliminate the worry of detection

• Identifying the three elements is easier than measuring the three elements

• The fraud risk factor may originate from internal or external sources

Page 10: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

The Fraud Circle

INHERENT FRAUD

SCHEME

Fraud Concealment

Permutation Analysis

Fraud Scenario

Fraud Opportunity

Fraud Response

Fraud Red Flags

Fraud Conversion

Page 11: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Inherent Fraud Schemes

• Each business system has a finite and predictable list of inherent fraud schemes, typically five to seven inherent schemes

• Each inherent fraud scheme has a finite and predictable list of fraud permutations

• Each fraud scheme permutation creates a finite and predictable list of fraud scenarios

Page 12: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Inherent Fraud Schemes Example

• In the payroll system, a ghost employee is a common fraud scheme that has at least eight different variations.

• Audit procedures would pertain to the specific variation.

• For example:– Think about the difference between a fictitious

ghost employee and a no-show ghost employee– How would audit tests differ?

Page 13: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Costly Types of Fraud

Some of the more costly types of fraud include but are not limited to:• Financial Statement Fraud• Check Forgery• Credit Card Fraud• Medical/Insurance Claim Fraud

Page 14: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Other Common Types of Fraud

Including, but not limited to:• Falsifying timesheets for a higher amount of pay• Pilfering stamps• Stealing of any kind (e.g., cash, petty cash, supplies,

equipment, tools, data, records, etc.)• Forgery (not just check forgery, e.g. forging

department head signatures on purchase orders)• Lapping collections on customers’ accounts • Check Kiting • Pocketing payments on customers’ accounts, issuing

receipts on self-designed receipt books

Page 15: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Other Common Types of Fraud• Not depositing all cash receipts (deposits are not “intact”)• Creating fictitious employees and collecting the paychecks

(impersonation)• Failing to end personnel assignments for terminated

employees and collecting the paychecks• Paying for personal expenses with business funds• Increasing vendor invoices through collusion• Billing for services not rendered and collecting the cash• Seizing checks payable to vendors• Recording fictitious transactions on the books to cover up

theft

Page 16: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Internal Control Inhibitors

• Circumvention• Exploitation• Avoidance

Page 17: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Concealing the Fraud

• Management override• Collusion• Blocking the flow of information– Layering a transaction– Use of intermediaries– Labeling the transaction as confidential– Using secrecy standards– Using people in a position of trust to provide

legitimacy

Page 18: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Concealing the Fraud

• Cross-border/geographic distance• Direct pressure on manager• Direct pressure based on the person’s

relationship with the company• Processing a transaction below the “control

radar”• False documentation

Page 19: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Concealing the Fraud

• Changes to internal controls or audit trails• Complexity of the transaction (causing a lack

of understanding)• Concealing transactions amount other

transactions

Page 20: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Fraud Red Flags

• Indicates a potential for a fraud scheme (not necessarily that a fraud has occurred)

• A triggering event• Not all red flags have the same weight or

value• The weight of the red flag or the total number

of red flags does correlate with the likelihood of a fraudulent transaction

Page 21: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Employee Red Flags

• Employee lifestyle changes: expensive cars, jewelry, homes, clothes

• Significant personal debt and credit problems• Behavioral changes: these may be an indication of

drugs, alcohol, gambling, or just fear of losing the job• High employee turnover, especially in those areas

which are more vulnerable to fraud• Refusal to take vacation or sick leave• Lack of segregation of duties in the vulnerable area

Page 22: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Management Red Flags

• Reluctance to provide information to auditors• Managers engage in frequent disputes with auditors• Management decisions are dominated by an individual

or small group• Managers display significant disrespect for regulatory

bodies• There is a weak internal control environment• Accounting personnel are lax or inexperienced in their

duties• Decentralization without adequate monitoring

Page 23: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Management Red Flags

• Excessive number of checking accounts• Frequent changes in banking accounts• Frequent changes in external auditors• Company assets sold under market value• Significant downsizing in a healthy market• Continuous rollover of loans• Excessive number of year end transactions• High employee turnover rate

Page 24: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Management Red Flags

• Unexpected overdrafts or declines in cash balances

• Refusal by company or division to use serial numbered documents (receipts)

• Compensation program that is out of proportion• Any financial transaction that doesn’t make sense

- either common or business• Service Contracts result in no product• Photocopied or missing documents

Page 25: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Changes in Behavior “Red Flags”The following behavior changes can be “Red Flags” for Embezzlement:

• Borrowing money from co-workers• Creditors or collectors appearing at the workplace• Gambling beyond the ability to stand the loss• Excessive drinking or other personal habits• Easily annoyed at reasonable questioning• Providing unreasonable responses to questions• Refusing vacations or promotions for fear of detection• Bragging about significant new purchases• Carrying unusually large sums of money• Rewriting records under the guise of neatness in presentation

Page 26: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Red Flags in Cash/Accounts Receivable

Since cash is the asset most often misappropriated, local government officials and auditors should pay close attention to any of these warning signs.• Excessive number of voids, discounts and returns• Unauthorized bank accounts• Sudden activity in a dormant banking accounts• Taxpayer complaints that they are receiving non-

payment notices• Discrepancies between bank deposits and posting

Page 27: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Red Flags in Cash/Accounts Receivable

• Abnormal number of expense items, supplies, or reimbursement to the employee

• Presence of employee checks in the petty cash for the employee in charge of petty cash

• Excessive or unjustified cash transactions• Large number of write-offs of accounts• Bank accounts that are not reconciled on a timely

basis

Page 28: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Red Flags in PayrollRed flags that show up in payroll are generally worthy of looking into. Although payroll is usually an automated function, it is a vulnerable area, especially if collusion is involved.• Inconsistent overtime hours for a cost center• Overtime charged during a slack period• Overtime charged for employees who normally would not

have overtime wages• Budget variations for payroll by cost center• Employees with duplicate Social Security numbers, names,

and addresses• Employees with few or no payroll deductions

Page 29: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Red Flags in Purchasing/Inventory

• Increasing number of complaints about products or service

• Increase in purchasing inventory but no increase in sales

• Abnormal inventory shrinkage• Lack of physical security over assets/inventory• Charges without shipping documents• Payments to vendors who aren’t on an approved

vendor list

Page 30: Understanding Fraud ACCT 5329 Fall 2012. Definition of Fraud Gaining an unfair advantage over another person. Legally, there must be: 1.A false statement,

Red Flags in Purchasing/Inventory

• High volume of purchases from new vendors• Purchases that bypass the normal procedures• Vendors without physical addresses• Vendor addresses matching employee addresses• Excess inventory and inventory that is slow to

turnover• Purchasing agents that pick up vendor payments

rather than have it mailed