understanding private blockchains
TRANSCRIPT
Understanding private blockchains
Dr Gideon Greenspan, Founder and CEO
A brief history of blockchains
2009 Bitcoin
2011—2013 Altcoins
2015— Many private blockchains
http
://c
orpo
rate
.com
cast
.com
/com
cast
-voi
ces/
com
cast
-spo
nsor
s-in
tern
et-m
easu
rem
ent-
hack
atho
n
Public blockchains in enterprises?
• Low capacity • Poor governance • Unknown costs • Anonymous miners • Cryptocurrencies • Writable by all • Visible to all • One bloated ledger
Blockchains for enterprises
• Private shared database • Byzantine fault tolerance • Control of capacity + cost • Designated “miners” • No cryptocurrency • Collective admin • Blockchain as
tool not ideology
Tomato 1
This is just a shared
database!
Centralized shared databases
Client Server
Client
Request
Peer-to-peer shared databases
Node
Node
Node
Node Transaction
Block
Peer-to-peer shared databases
Node
Node
Node
Node Transaction
Block
Blockchain
Consensus created by validator nodes
Peer-to-peer DB requirements
• Atomic transactions – Self-contained “packets”
• Peer-to-peer ⇒ origin unknown – Transactions digitally signed – All data tagged by public key/s
• Shared write ⇒ transaction constraints – Bitcoin vs Ethereum style
• Consensus mechanism
Signed by Bob
Signed by Alice
Alice £10
Bob $15
Alice $15
Bob £10
Bitcoin-style constraints
Metadata: b469dc12a0746…
Ethereum-style constraints
from = msg.sender fromvalue = contract.storage[from]
to = msg.data[0] value = msg.data[1]
if fromvalue >= value: contract.storage[from] -= value contract.storage[to] += value return(1) else: return(0)
A new type of shared database
Tomato 2
This is not immutable!
“Mining” in private chains
• All blocks signed by miner • Only permitted miners
ü No impersonation attacks
• Mining diversity constraint ü Proof of work not required
On immutability
• Public blockchains – Secured by hashing power – Mutable by 51% of hashrate – Threat: someone rich (e.g. a government)
• Private blockchains – Secured by distributed consensus – Mutable by ≥51% of validators – Threat: validator collusion
Tomato 3
This is not a blockchain!
Public vs private blockchains
Different Same
Permissions model Peer-to-peer architecture
Transaction censorship Byzantine fault tolerance
Native cryptocurrency Public key cryptography
“The blockchain” Transaction constraints
Proof-of-work consensus Consensus chain of blocks
Public vs private blockchains
Different Same
Permissions model Peer-to-peer architecture
Transaction censorship Byzantine fault tolerance
Native cryptocurrency Public key cryptography
“The blockchain” Transaction constraints
Proof-of-work consensus Consensus chain of blocks
Philosophical Investigations
“the meaning of a word is its use in the language”
— LW
Tomato 4
This has no uses!
What are blockchains for?
• Old problem: – Shared database (or ledger) – Multiple writers – Limited trust
• Old solution: – Centralized database at intermediary
• New possibility: – Use a (private) blockchain
Blockchains vs centralized DBs
Advantages Disadvantages
Disintermediation Confidentiality
Robustness Performance
Post-trade settlement?
• Interbank blockchain • Issue any asset on chain • Rapid settlement • Delivery versus payment • No need for reconciliation • Regulatory transparency
Post-trade settlement?
• Interbank blockchain • Issue any asset on chain • Rapid settlement • Delivery versus payment • No need for reconciliation • Regulatory transparency
Confidentiality
Strong blockchain use cases
• Lightweight financial systems • Provenance tracking • Interorganizational record keeping – Multiparty data aggregation
Lightweight finance
• Any asset can be tokenized on blockchain – Tokens issued by trusted entity/s – Token confers right of redemption
• Disintermediates centralized control – More secure and cheaper
• Confidentiality limits applications – Small financial trading circles – Gift cards, loyalty points
Provenance tracking
• Digital certificate of authenticity – Physical transfer ⇒ token transfer – Verifiable chain of custody
• Disintermediates risk of fraud – Collusion cannot corrupt
• Confidentiality via multiple addresses – Fewer transactions between competitors – Regulation can still be a concern
Asset movement patterns
Interorganizational records
• Collectively record and notarize – Communications or transactions – Digital signatures + immutability
• Infrastructure solution for large groups • Disintermediates external party – Cheaper and simpler
• Confidentiality easily addressed – Encryption or hashing
Tomato 5
This is nothing new!
Blockchain Old-Timers
New? Bitcoin transaction model
http
://q
iita.
com
/yan
agis
awa-
kent
aro/
item
s/50
3dfc
e376
2e3b
1237
c9
New? Compact state proofs
http
s://
blog
.eth
ereu
m.o
rg/2
015/
11/1
5/m
erkl
ing-
in-e
ther
eum
/
New: Awareness + Productization
Tomato 6
This is overhyped!
• x
http://ericsammons.com/what-is-the-blockchain/
https://ripple.com/insights/2016-will-be-the-year-you-realized-you-dont-need-the-blockchain/
• x
http://ericsammons.com/what-is-the-blockchain/
https://ripple.com/insights/2016-will-be-the-year-you-realized-you-dont-need-the-blockchain/
Tomato 7
This is all vaporware!
MultiChain blockchain platform
• Off-the-shelf private blockchains ü Easy to configure and deploy
• Permission management ü Private and tightly controlled
• Native asset support ü Tracked at network level
• Extendable via metadata ü Up to 8MB arbitrary data per transaction
MultiChain.com search acquisition
Jul 2015
Aug 2015
Sep 2015
Oct 2015
Nov 2015
Dec 2015
Jan 2016
Feb 2016
Mar 2016
Apr 2016
May 2016
Questions?
Visit www.multichain.com for:
MultiChain download Getting started guide
Developer docs and forum Popular private blockchain blog