united nations environment programme environment for ... mountain report... · any opinion of the...
TRANSCRIPT
United Nations Environment Programme
Environment for Development
Dinaric Arc and Balkans Environment Outlook
DABEO
Proposal on the Geographic Extent of the Balkans/Dinaric Arc Region for
the DABEO Reporting Process
D A B E O Dinaric Arc and Balkans Environment Outlook
Geographic Extent Proposal
1
Disclaimer
The designation of geographical entities in this report do not imply the expression of
any opinion of the United Nations Organization, the United Nations Environment
Programme (UNEP) or any other partner of the Environment and Security Initiative
concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or
concerning the delimitations of its frontiers or boundaries. For the purpose of this report
the acronym FYROM has been used to refer to the Former Yugoslav Republic of
Macedonia.
The views expressed in this report are the sole responsibility of the author and can
under no condition be regarded as reflecting the position of the United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP), the involved Division of Early Warning and
Assessment (UNEP/DEWA) office for Europe in Geneva, and the Regional Office for
Europe in Vienna (UNEP/ROE).
The partial or total reproduction of the contents is authorized provided the source is
fully acknowledged.
Citation: Dinaric Arc and Balkans Environment Outlook (DABEO). Proposal on the
Geographic Extent of the Balkans/Dinaric Arc Region for the DABEO Reporting
Process. UNEP/DEWA/GRID, 2010, Geneva.
This proposal was prepared in 2009 and 2010 by UNEP/DEWA/GRID∼Europe and
UNEP/ROE/Vienna.
Author: Dusan Djordjevic, consultant, UNEP/DEWA/GRID∼Europe.
Maps prepared and modified by: UNEP/DEWA/GRID∼Europe.
Geographic Extent Proposal
2
Contents
The Balkan Peninsula ...................................................................................... 3
Geology .............................................................................................................. 8
The Dinaric Alps ............................................................................................................. 11
The Pindus Mountains .................................................................................................. 12
The Balkan Mountains ................................................................................................... 13
The Rilo-Rhodope Mountains ...................................................................................... 13
Hydrology ....................................................................................................... 14
Climate ............................................................................................................. 16
Biodiversity ..................................................................................................... 18
Ecoregions ....................................................................................................... 20
The Illyrian deciduous forests ..................................................................................... 21
The Dinaric Mountain mixed forests .......................................................................... 22
The Pindus Mountains mixed forests......................................................................... 22
The Balkan mixed forests .............................................................................................. 23
The Rhodope Montane mixed forests ........................................................................ 23
Geographic Extent Proposal ........................................................................ 24
The Ecoregion Delineation Approach ........................................................................ 24
The Mountain Area Delineation Approach .............................................................. 26
Bibliography .................................................................................................... 29
Geographic Extent Proposal
3
The Balkan Peninsula
While it is today easy to understand what constitutes the Balkan Peninsula in
political terms, the unique geographical definition remains a matter of debate in
scientific circles. In view of modern political division of states, the Balkan
Peninsula as a region can be defined by the territorial boundaries of Albania,
Bulgaria, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Former Yugoslav Republic of
Macedonia (FYROM), Montenegro, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, Greece and the
western part of Turkey. However, due to cultural, socio-economic or
geographical differences, countries that are often omitted from the working
definitions are Romania, Turkey and often even Greece (Andonovski et al. 2006).
The northern boundaries of the Balkan Peninsula separating it from the Central
European region are not clearly defined geographically. For these reasons,
various definitions can be found in the literature and are subject to change
depending on the objectives of the source.
The purpose of this paper is to propose a definition of the geographic extent of
the Balkans and Dinaric Arc for the DABEO reporting process. A working
definition is required that will attempt to provide a delineation in terms of
physical geography and ecoregions, rather than the existing political boundaries.
The Balkan Peninsula is often described as a triangular piece of land which
extends from the rest of the Central Europe in the north into the Mediterranean
Sea in the south. Thus, clear demarcation of what physically constitutes the
Balkan Peninsula is already made distinct by the Adriatic Sea in the west, the
Ionian and the Aegean Seas in the south, and the Black Sea in the east.
The eastern boundary of the Balkan Peninsula is one point that might lead to
debate. Often the eastern boundary is considered to follow the Bosphorus Strait.
In this view, the western part of Turkey would be included in the definition of
the Balkans (Griffiths et al. 2004). However, for the purpose of this study the
eastern boundary shall be demarcated along the political boundaries of the
westernmost part of Turkey with Bulgaria and Greece. The reason for this
should be considered partly in terms of the cultural specificities of the region,
and partly because the DABEO study’s objective is to pay greater attention to the
geographical and biological specificity of the region, with a focus on mountain
areas as a natural reserve of the unique attributes of the Balkan/Dinaric region.
Geographic Extent Proposal
4
Figure 1. The Balkan Peninsula (Socha – Krka – Sava Rivers used as the northern delineation)
Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b6/Balkan_topo_en.jpg
Modified by: UNEP/DEWA/GRID~Europe 2009
The eastern boundary follows the coast of the Black Sea to the northeast. The
furthest northeastern point of the Balkan Peninsula cannot be clearly demarcated
and definitions often vary. While some definitions take the political boundary of
Bulgaria with Romania to be the line of division, others may include part of
southeastern Romania, following the course of the Danube River until the point
where it forms its delta into the Black Sea (Reed et al. 2004). Romania is in
geographic and climatic character much closer to Central Europe than to the
Balkans. The mountains of Romania belong to the wider Carpathian Mountains
region. Therefore, for the purpose of this study, the working definition of the
Balkan Peninsula should consider the political boundary between Bulgaria and
Romania to be the line of demarcation. This particular area shared by
northeastern Bulgaria and southeastern Romania is called Dobruja. Due to the
Geographic Extent Proposal
5
distinctive geophysical and biological features of this region, it should be given
special attention in the process of geographic extent demarcation.
The northern boundary of the Balkan Peninsula with Central Europe is not
clearly defined by any mountain ranges or great bodies of water. The northern
political boundaries of the Balkan countries encompass southern parts of the
great Pannonian Plane extending toward Central Europe. In the absence of any
more significant physical boundary, the Danube River is usually taken as the
division line (Griffiths et al. 2004). Indeed, the line of flow of the Danube offers
an appropriate demarcation between the mountainous southern regions so
characteristic of the Balkans from the northern plane regions of Central Europe.
The Iron Gate, a gorge of the Danube River, is not only a natural boundary
between Romania in north and Serbia in south, but according to the EEA and the
WWF it also presents a clear separation between the Carpathian Mountains
ecoregion and the Balkan Mountains ecoregion. This division is based on the
Digital Map of European Ecological Regions which was developed by the EEA
and was harmonized with the Ecological Regions of WWF (EEA 2005, Ruffini et
al. 2006).
However, in the most recent work done on the delineation of the Carpathian
Mountains region, as a support to the Carpathian Convention implementation
process, some adjustments have been adopted in regard to this division. In view
of the national experts of Serbia, and based on the criteria of geological and
biological diversity (Ruffini et al. 2006), the entire territory of the Djerdap
National Park is also to be included in the Carpathian Mountains region. In
order to secure one integral territory, Serbia’s national proposal concerns
territory stretching from the municipality of Golubac to the hydroelectric power
plant Djerdap I, includes the entire territory of the Djerdap National Park with
some extensions, totaling 732 km2 of surface. Statistical units that are this way
included in the Carpathians region are municipalities of Golubac, Majdanpek
and Kladovo (Ruffini et al. 2006).
In conclusion, the Carpathians Environment Outlook adopted the Timok River
Valley as the southernmost border of the Carpathian region, and as the natural
division line between the Carpathian and the Stara Planina (Balkan) Mountains
(UNEP 2007).
Geographic Extent Proposal
6
The line of northern division continues following the flow of the Sava River,
which divides the Pannonian and Peri-Pannonian regions of Croatia in the north
from the slopes of the Dinaric Arc in the south and southwest (Andonovski et al.
2006). In the upstream flow the Sava and Krka Rivers provide a near division of
the territory of Slovenia into the northern region of the Julian Alps and the
Pannonian planes and the southern region of the Dinaric plateaus (Perko 2004).
Again, the clear division of the Julian Alps from the Dinaric Alps is the potential
cause of debate. The extreme northwestern boundary of the Balkan Peninsula
may either follow the political boundary between Slovenia and Italy, or the flow
of the Socha River. Building on previous extensive attempts to introduce
regionalization schemes in Slovenia, Perko (1998) introduced a new
regionalization of Slovenia based on an analysis of rock, surface relief, climate,
vegetation, and land use using the Geographic Information System. His
methodology divides Slovenia into “four macro-regions, nine sub-macro-regions,
and 49 mezzo-regions” (Perko 1998). The four macro-regions are namely the
Alpine macroregion, Mediterranean macro-region, Dinaric macro-region, and the
Pannonian macro-region.
Figure 2. Macroregions division in Slovenia using Drago Perko methodology. Source: Geographic
Institute AM ZRC SAZU, 1998. Modifyed by UNEP/DEWA/GRID~Europe.
Geographic Extent Proposal
7
At the extreme northwestern end of the Dinaric macro-region, the plateau-like
mezzo-region is split by the deeply cut Socha Valley. At the extreme northern
end of the Dinaric macro-region, Ljubljansko barje (Ljubljana Moor) stretches
northward to the Ljubljana Gate (Ljubljanska vrata) and is the southernmost part
of the vast “Ljubljanska kotlina” (Ljubljana Basin), which north of the Ljubljana
Gate belongs to the Alpine macro-region (Perko 1998). These proposed divisions
based on sound methodology could prove to be a good starting point for the
delineation of the Dinaric Arc and geographic area to be considered in the
DABEO reporting process.
These boundaries outline a territory of an approximate surface of 500’000 km2.
The great diversity of landscapes, flora and fauna of the region as defined above
owe their evolution to the complex and specific physical geography of the
region, and to the special location of a transition zone for biota (Krystufek et al.
2004).
Geographic Extent Proposal
8
Geology
From its recent geological past, the Balkan Peninsula owes its topographic
configuration to the Alpine orogenic activity that culminated in the mid-Tertiary
period. Physiographically, the Balkans can be viewed as the part of the Alpine
Mountains region, and one of the four major physiographic regions of Europe
extending from the Betic Cordillera of southern Spain to the Caucasus
Mountains. Another recent event in geological terms that greatly influenced the
features of the Balkans was the Messinian Salinity Crisis (5.7- 5.4 Ma.), when the
loss of inflow of sea water from the Atlantic led to formation of shallow super-
saline basins, causing erosion of river valleys and caves and a change in the
ecology (Ager 1980, Robertson et al. 1984, Grove et al. 2003, Reed et al 2004).
Many areas in the Balkans are still tectonically active and are known for severe
earthquake events and frequent landslides. The Balkan Peninsula is
geotectonically divided into external and internal zones. The external zone is
spread along the Adriatic and Ionian coasts, and bounded by the Dinarides-
Hellenides Mountain range. It is characterized by Alpine orogenesis and a
relatively simple geotectonic structure comprising sedimentary sequences. The
internal zone (to the east of the external zone) was affected by older orogenic
movements and is characterized by a complex geotectonic structure.
Metamorphic massifs, plutonic and volcanic intrusions, and opholite structure
areas dominate this zone (Ager 1980, Moores et al. 1997, Griffiths et al. 2004,
Skoulikidis 2009).
Distinguishing a mountain environment from a non-mountain environment is
based on criteria developed by geographers aiming to establish environmental
gradients. The criteria developed by UNEP/WCMC, for example, are based on
combinations of altitude and slopes to determine what constitutes a mountain.
Seven defined classes of mountains are determined as first class above 4500
meters, second class from 3500m to 4500m, and third class from 2500m to 3500m.
Mountains of fourth class are those with elevations from 1500m to 2500m and a
slope of 2° and more, while class three mountains have altitudes from 1000m to
1500m and a slope of 5° and more, or a local elevation range of more than 300
meters within a radius of 7 km. The sixth class of mountains is defined by
elevations from 300 to 1000 meters and a local elevation range of more than 300
meters within a radius of 7 km. The most recently added seventh class of
mountain environment considers isolated inner basins and plateaus less than 25
Geographic Extent Proposal
9
km2 in extent that are surrounded by mountains, but do not themselves meet
criteria of the previous six (UNEP/WCMC, 2002).
This global delineation does not include areas at altitudes below 300m. However,
in some areas along the coasts of the Adriatic and Ionian Seas, there are
mountains that extend down to sea level. This implies that, as in the case of
European mountains, delineation should be based on a combination of altitude
and topography (NORDREGIO 2004).
Figure 3. Mountains of Europe, using UNEP-WCMC 2000 global delineation
Source: NORDREGIO 2004
Geographic Extent Proposal
10
Defined in this way, the mountainous environment covers about 27% of the
Earth’s surface. The Balkan Peninsula can then correctly be considered as a
mountainous region, given that approximately 70% of the delineated territory is
characterized by high relief and long mountain chains (Reed et al. 2004). High
mountain chains rise from a narrow coast and at times almost directly from the
sea throughout the entire length of the Adriatic, the Ionian and the Aegean Seas.
The highest point of the Balkan Peninsula is the Rila Mountain with Mousala
Peak at 2926 meters belonging to the Rilo-Rhodope Mountain Ranges in
Bulgaria. Other countries of the region also have peaks between 2500 and 3000
meters, apart from Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina in the lower region of the
Dinaric Alps with highest points of 1830m and 2386m respectively (Reed et al.
2004). Table 1. Percentage of Mountain Area of the Balkan Countries as Defined by
UNEP-WCMC Methodology and National Criteria
Mountain Area
UNEP-WCMC
(km2)
% of
National
Territory
Mountain Area
National Def.
(km2)
% of
National
Territory
Albania 20,604 71.7 15,000 60
Bosnia&Herzegovina 38,112 74.5 N/A
Bulgaria 44,730 40.3 44,000 40
Croatia 16,578 29.3 21,000 38
FYROM 21,530 83.7 N/A
Slovenia 13,534 66.8 9,500 47
Serbia&Montenegro 54,890 53.7 N/A
Greece 72,898 55.2 79,000 60
Source: Cooperation for the Protection, 2006
A view of the general character of the Balkan Peninsula Mountains may lead to
the conclusion that relief varies between west and east. While the mountains of
the western area are comprised of the Dinaric Alps and the Pindus Mountains
which rise very steeply from the coastal area, the eastern mountain ranges of the
Balkan Mountains and the Rhodope Mountains have rather gentle slopes. Each
of these mountains is of different sedimentary composition and has a different
tectonic history. Metamorphic, magmatic and sedimentary rocks like granite,
marble, blueschist and sandstone are all found here with local variations, while
in Slovenia alone 50 different types of rocks can be found (Mrsic 1997).
However, unlike the others, the Dinaric Alps are dominated by carbonate rocks
(Ager 1980, Robertson et al. 1984, Griffiths et al. 2004).
Geographic Extent Proposal
11
The Dinaric Alps
The Dinaric Alps are a dominating feature of the Balkan Peninsula. They stretch
from northwest from the River Sava in Slovenia to southeast throughout Croatia,
Bosnia, Serbia and Montenegro to Albania, covering a territory of nearly 100’000
km2. Although the Dinaric range seems to extend into the ranges of the Pindus
Mountains in Greece, a clear delineation between the two can be made at the
Scutari-Pec line in northern Albania, which is taken as the southern ending point
of the Dinaric Alps (Ager 1980, Reed et al. 2004). From this point there is evident
a great difference in geology of the Pindus Mountains where volcanic and
metamorphic rocks dominate. The Dinaric Mountains are a series of nearly
parallel ridges, plateaus and depressions, dissected by steep-sided valleys (Perko
2004, Andonovski et al. 2006, Tvrtkovic et al. 2006). The northern part of the
system is lower and the highest mountains are in the southern part, with the
highest peak Maja Jezerce at 2694 meters in Albania.
The dominant rock type of this mountain range is Cretaceous limestone, while
Triassic sediments of sandstones and shells are common in the northwestern
karst region. The term karst is used to describe a geological landscape that
develops wherever limestone formations, or other carbonate rocks, dominate the
region and spread over extensive areas. Due to their solubility, these rock
formations develop high permeability along fractures and faults, with the
formation of sinkholes, chasms, underground streams and caves, thus leading to
creation of karstic aquifers which contain large amounts of groundwater
(Tvrtkovic et al. 2006). They also support unique ecosystems very rich in
biodiversity. The process of dissolving of limestone by rainwater creates
characteristic landscapes of small depressions called “dolina”, and larger basins
called “polje”. The poljes and dolines support soil formation in this otherwise
dry, barren landscape to the extent that poljes can sustain dense forests, while
dolines greatly contribute to regional biodiversity (Kruckeberg 2004, Tvrtkovic
2006). This truly unique karst ecosystem covers a large continuous region of the
Dinaric Alps, starting from southern Slovenia and continuing through middle
and southeastern Croatia, southwestern Bosnia, all of Herzegovina, southern
Montenegro and western Albania. Isolated karst islands also appear in western
Serbia and FYROM, containing some typical Dinaric species within them.
Geographic Extent Proposal
12
North of Albania, these mountain chains of the Dinaric Alps characterized by
karst can be divided into three regions. The northern karst includes the Velebit
Mountains (Vaganski Peak at 1757m), the central karst extends south of the Una
River, with parallel ranges like Biokovo separated by poljes (Cincer Peak at
2008m), and the southern karst which is a high plateau south of the Neretva
River, with the highest point being Durmitor Peak at 2522m, characterized by
Jurassic limestone. The further ranges in Albania are more complex with a large
share of Triassic limestone, Paleozoic rocks beneath, and intrusions of igneous
and metamorphic rocks. The northern Albanian Alps are the most rugged
mountains in the region with glaciated limestone summits rising above 2400m.
Further south are the Murdita Mountain, a glaciated plateau of igneous and
metamorphic rock rising above 2100m (Andonovski et al. 2006).
The eastern region of the Dinaric Alps is a high plateau of Tertiary deposits,
gabbros and granites, extending to the south of the Vrbas River in Bosnia. Here
ridges of the Dinaric Mountains are aligned from northwest to southeast, with
the highest peak Cemernica/Paripovac of 1631m near the Bosnian city of
Sarajevo. Further to the southeast, the Dinaric Mountains form a platform of
Paleozoic schist, with remnants of Jurassic and Triassic limestone extending into
the western part of the Rhodope Mountains. This high platform with extensive
mountains of Shar Planina (Turcin 2748m), Kopaonik, Mokra Gora, Koprivnik
Planina (2522 m) and Zljeb Gora (2403 m), to name a few, are shared between
Serbia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) and Albania. The
Shara Mountain extend further south to Albania, where their relief becomes a
gentler form of Tertiary sandstone and flysch rising again to the heights of the
Grammos Mountains, with the highest peak Grammos of 2524m on the border
between Albania and Greece (Andonovski et al. 2006).
The Pindus Mountains
Further south the Pindus Mountains stretch along the Ionian and Aegean Sea
coasts, starting from the southern part of Albania and southwest of FYROM, and
continuing to south to the Peloponnesus, and further to the islands of Crete and
Rhodes. These mountains are made of volcanic and metamorphic rock, and are
characterized by complex folding of upper rocks over basal rocks on a large scale
and similar to the Jura Mountains in the European Alps, while the ranges of the
islands are composed mainly of Triassic and Mesozoic carbonate rocks. The
Geographic Extent Proposal
13
maximum elevation of this mountain range is the peak of Smolikas at 2637
meters (Grove et al. 2003, McNeill 2003, Reed 2004).
The Balkan Mountains
The Stara Planina Mountains or the Balkan Mountains are one dominant feature
of the eastern part of the Balkan Peninsula, formed at the same period as the
Carpathian Mountains. This mountain range begins at the Iron Gate, a gorge of
the Danube River, the point where the Carpathians end. The mountain range
extends southward from this point with its ridges acting as a natural boundary
between Serbia and Bulgaria, where the highest peak Midzor reaches 2169
meters. The mountain range stretches from west to east across the entire
territory of Bulgaria to the Black Sea. The highest peak in this part is Botev (2376
meters); these higher areas are mostly of igneous rock. The rest of the western
and central mountain range is between 1000 and 1800 meters in altitude and
formed of Paleozoic schist and igneous rock at its core, with a layer of Jurassic
and Cretaceous limestone. The eastern part is lower and broad as it approaches
the Black Sea, with sedimentary rocks predominating here (Ager 1980,
Andonovski et al. 2006).
The Rilo-Rhodope Mountains
The Rilo-Rhodope Mountains massif further to the south follows nearly the same
direction as the Balkan Mountains. However, they are of quite different geology
due to their Alpine orogeny, more similar to the southeastern region of the
Dinaric Alps, and nearly connect with them in the territories of FYROM and
Serbia (Ager 1980, Reed et al. 2004). They begin from the northern Sredna Gora
just south of the Stara Mountain, and form a plateau composed of the same schist
and igneous rock, rising up to 1606m at Bogdan peak. Further south the ranges
are folded and partially covered by flysch and Mesozoic rock (Andonovski et al.
2006). The boundary with Turkey follows these mountain ranges which
gradually descend towards the east, only to reappear again to the southeast by
the Black Sea, where they form a low mountain area of Strandja rising to no more
than 500 meters (Andonovski et al. 2006). The highest areas of Rila and Pirin
contain more than 100 peaks above 2500 meters and have an alpine character
Geographic Extent Proposal
14
with evidence of glaciations. The highest alpine peaks here are Mousala (2926
meters) and Vihren (2915 meters).
An outstandingly large number of caves and cave systems is another
characteristic feature of the Balkan Peninsula, with the most renowned cave
systems of the karstic region of the Dinaric Alps. Caves, cave systems, deep
valleys and underground streams owe their formation to the dissolution and
erosion of soft bedrock. The most famous of these are Postojnska Jama and the
World Heritage Site of Skocjanske Jame. Numerous habitats are found in caves,
of which terrestrial, freshwater and brackish (transient between seawater and
freshwater) water habitats can be distinguished, hosting a large number of
endemic species of flora and fauna (Kruckeberg 2004, Reed et al. 2004, Tvrtkovic
et al. 2006).
Hydrology
The relatively young geology of the Peninsula predetermines its highly
fragmented hydrographic networks. Small and medium-sized mountainous
rivers dominate the area and run through steep and narrow valleys. These rivers
are characterized by flash flow and sediment regimes. There are also a few low-
gradient rivers crossing the Balkans and forming extensive flood and deltaic
plains. Seven river basins in the Balkans are trans-boundary. The total
catchment area of fifteen rivers equals 182637 km2. The major river system of the
region is formed by the Danube and its tributaries: the Drava, the Tisza, the Sava,
the Morava, the Isker, the Sereth and the Pruth. Among the main rivers, the
Kamchia enters the Black Sea, while all others flow into the Mediterranean.
Eight rivers flowing into the Aegean Sea are the Evros, the Nestos, the Strymon,
the Axios, the Aliakmon, the Pinios, the Sperchios and the Evrotas; three flowing
into the Adriatic Sea are the Neretva, the Drin and the Aoos; and three into the
Ionian Sea are the Arachthos, Acheloos and Alfeios. The majority of Balkan
rivers form deltaic plains, while some of them form natural lakes and lagoons.
Almost all of these wetlands are of international importance (Skoulikidis 2009).
Physiogeographic and hydrochemical conditions of lakes vary significantly and
can be classified into three main zones. Most of the Balkan lakes are of tectonic
origin and include the ancient lakes Ohrid (Albania-FYROM), Prespa (FYROM-
Greece-Albania) and Ioannina (Greece) formed in the late Tertiary. The largest,
Lake Ohrid, was formed through rifting, while Lakes Prespa and Ioannina
formed as a result of karstic processes. Prespa and Ionannina are desolation
Geographic Extent Proposal
15
basins that have undergone continuous subsidence since their formation. More
recent subsiding basins include Lake Dojran (FYROM-Greece), Kastorias
(Greece) and the World Heritage Plitvice National Park system of lakes (Croatia)
(Albrecht et al. 2008).
Figure 4. Transboundary river basins of the Balkans.
Source: UNEP/DEWA/GRID~Europe 2009
Skadar/Shkoder Lake situated on the border between Montenegro and Albania
in the southern part of the Dinaric Alps is the largest lake on the Balkan
Peninsula in terms of water surface. Its drainage area is about 5500 km2 and it
drains to the southeast through the Buna-Bojana River to the Adriatic.
Skadar/Shkoder Lake features a complex freshwater ecosystem, associated with
wetlands, floodplains and karstic features. Skadar/Shkoder Lake is the largest
karstic lake in Europe formed relatively recently in a shallow subsiding tectonic
depression within limestone from the Dinaric chain. The west side of the lake
takes the form of a limestone wall or dune, which resulted from the Dinarides
orogenic activity. This limestone wall separates the Skadar/Shkoder Lake,
which is below the sea level, from the Adriatic Sea (Ager 1980, Reed et al. 2004).
It is considered that Skadar/Shkoder Lake is linked by way of a large trans-
boundary karstic groundwater aquifer through the Drin River Basin, to Lake
Geographic Extent Proposal
16
Ohrid and Lake Prespa, two other karstic lakes of the Balkan Peninsula. Due to
its low elevation, southern location and shallow water, Lake Shkoder has high
water temperatures, causing high rates of organic decomposition, and because
the lake never freezes, it is a prime winter location for birds (World Bank 2008).
Ohrid Lake shared between Albania and FYROM, Prespa Lake shared between
Albania, FYROM and Greece, and Mikri Prespa Lake shared between Albania
and Greece are the lakes of the Balkan Peninsula which are classified as the
European lake group called “Dessaretes”. Maliq Lake once located in Albania
also belonged to this group of lakes, but was drained after the World War II. Not
taking into account the transcontinental Caspian Lake, Lake Ohrid is the only
European ancient lake (Albrecht et al. 2008). With a surface are of 358 km2 and
212 endemic species, this is one of the lakes with the highest biodiversity in the
world. Ohrid and Prespa Lakes are bounded by the crystalline mountains of
Mokra Gora (1500m) on the west and the Baba Mountains (2600m) on the east.
The bedrock of the Galicica Mountains (2250m) separating the two lakes is made
of karstic carbonates of high water permeability, allowing for the lakes to be
connected, whereas Prespa Lake lies 150m higher than Ohrid Lake. Both lakes
are graben type lakes and have probably formed due to the collapse of the large
karstic fields “poljes” (Stankovic 1960, Albrecht et al. 2008).
Climate
Diversity of climate is a well-known characteristic of the wider Mediterranean
region, including the Balkan Peninsula. However, there are not many regions in
the world that reveal such large temperature contrasts and climate diversity as
the Balkans (Griffiths et al. 2004).
Altitudinal gradients, mountainous relief and the influence of the Mediterranean
and Black Seas generate a wide range of climatic conditions in the Balkan
Peninsula. Serving as a barrier between the Mediterranean and European parts
of the region, the Balkan Mountains prevent the access of warm air masses to the
north. The major part of the region falls within the temperate zone (35-48 N),
while the southern part (30-35 N) enjoys a typical Mediterranean climate.
Distinct bi-modal seasonality and strong north-south and east-west gradients are
the main climatic features of this region (Skoulikidis 2009). The regional climate
is dominated by polar air masses, while tropical air may also enter the region at
times of polar front depressions (Furlan 1977, Reed et al. 2004).
Geographic Extent Proposal
17
The mountainous character of the Balkans imposes extreme variability on the
climate of the peninsula, resulting in sharp transitions and associated variability
in vegetation types. Temperature contrasts are especially present in the western
Balkans, where the Dinaric Alps rise steeply from the narrow coastal region. The
temperature contrast is most notable in winter when coastal regions remain
protected from influxes of cold polar air from the north. There are three main
climate zones in the Balkans. First, a Mediterranean climate with mild, wet
winters and hot, dry summers is typical for the coastal regions and islands.
Precipitation occurs when western winds move south in winter, while summer
droughts occur when air masses from the dry belt move north. Mountain
regions have an Alpine climate, with strong altitudinal shifts in precipitation and
temperature. The northern lowlands, which are isolated from the influence of
the Mediterranean, but are open to Central and Eastern Europe, have a
continental climate (Furlan 1977, Reed et al. 2004).
The Dinaric Mountains have three types of climate. In the northern karst region,
a transitional climate is present, while a Mediterranean climate typifies the
central parts and continues to Albania. The eastern ridges of the Dinaric
Mountains are characterized by a continental climate. The Balkan Mountains
also have a continental climate, while the Rhodope Mountains have a modified
continental climate (Andonovski et al. 2006).
The karstic regions of the Dinaric Mountains experience cold winters and great
amounts of precipitation. High mountain ranges also have a great influence on
distribution of rainfall, as they prevent humid air and rainfall from penetrating
inland. Although barren land with a shortage of surface water, the region of
Crkvice in Montenegro at about 1050 meters has the highest level of precipitation
in Europe of more than 4600 mm annually. All other mountain ranges of the
Balkans experience most precipitation in the summer, while winters tend to be
dry with snow in the higher altitudes. The northern lowlands, which are isolated
from the influence of the Mediterranean, but are open to Central and Eastern
Europe, have a continental climate. Winters are frosty and snowy in this part of
the region, while summers are hot and dry with highest precipitation rates in
May and June. The presence of mountains thus predetermines the high climatic
variability, ranging from typical Mediterranean to continental (Reed et al. 2004,
Andonovski et al. 2006).
Geographic Extent Proposal
18
Biodiversity
The Balkan Peninsula is today recognized as one of Europe’s “hot spots” of
biodiversity and a region of global importance in regard to conservation efforts.
In part, this feature of the Balkans is due to diversity of topography in
combination with influences of both Mediterranean and continental climates.
However, this exceptional biodiversity and endemism of cave and ancient lake
environments, high terrestrial and river biodiversity is in part also due to its
historic role of a glacial refuge for plant and animal species, and also its location
at the crossroads for floral and faunal exchange between Central Europe on one
side and Asia Minor on the other (Griffiths et al. 2004).
High diversity and endemism of flora and fauna is most of all a remarkable
feature of the Dinaric Arc, but in the case of the Balkan Peninsula this feature
continues throughout the interior of the land, as well as other mountains of the
Balkans. Caves, lakes, river deltas and some 34 wetlands all present an
important reserve of amphibian species and ornithological stations for great
numbers of birds. The number of endemic species accounts for more than 10% of
the total flora population in some areas of the Dinaric Mountains. Up to date,
6530 native plant species are known to exist in the Balkans. Certain taxa have a
very restricted distribution range, as in case of the Velebit Mountain range, and
are included as threatened species in the 1997 IUCN Red List of Threatened
Plants (Eastwood 2004, Krystufek et al. 2004).
High faunal diversity is mostly in regard to birds, with some distinct species like
capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus), griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus), peregrine falcon
(Falco peregrinus), and kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). However, large carnivores
and herbivores still maintain populations of a significant size in these
mountainous areas. These are namely brown bear (Ursus arctos), lynx (Lynx
lynx), wolf (Canis lupus), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), red deer (Cervus
elaphus) and chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra). (WWF 2009)
While many plant and animal species are of global or European conservation
importance, a large number of them are critically endangered or extinct. Only in
Albania alone, the rate of species loss over the past 50 years has been one of the
highest in Europe. The Balkans region accounts for a number of Important Bird
Areas (IBA) and threatened Species of European Concern. The main threat to
some species and cause of more rapid extinction of other species is direct and
indirect human influence on the habitats (UNEP Vienna ISCC 2006).
Geographic Extent Proposal
19
Anthropogenic pressures may come in the form of poaching, wildlife trade,
farming and overgrazing, and uncontrolled collection of medicinal plants. While
most endangered species are currently given legal protection status, they are not
always effective unless their habitats are protected and whole ecosystems are
prevented from being damaged by anthropogenic activities. Protection of natural
ecosystems in the region was mainly secured in planned large-scale protected
areas. Large-scale protected areas are the Sutjeska (17350 ha) in Bosnia and
Herzegovina; Mavrovo (73088 ha), Galicica (22750 ha) and Pelister (12500 ha) in
FYROM; Durmitor (32000 ha) in Montenegro; as well as Djerdap (63608 ha),
Fruska Gora (25393 ha), Stara Planina (39000 ha), Tara (19175 ha) and Kopaonik
(11810 ha) in Serbia. (UNEP Vienna ISCC 2006, UNEP/GRID 2007)
Table 2. Number of Species Threatened
Birds Mammals Reptiles Fish Amphibian Tree Plant
Albania 6 2 4 27 2 0 0
Bosnia&Herzegovina 6 8 2 28 1 1 1
Bulgaria 12 13 2 13 0 0 0
Croatia 11 7 2 42 2 1 1
Greece 10 9 2 8 0 0 0
FYROM 10 11 5 50 5 2 11
Montenegro 9 6 2 20 1 0 0
Serbia 10 8 0 8 0 0 1
Slovenia 3 7 1 25 2 0 0
Source: World Resources Institute-The Environmental Information Portal 2009
A comprehensive and integrated study of biodiversity of the Balkan Peninsula
has never been carried out, apart from studies undertaken at the national level,
which may not necessarily be compatible with each other. Thus, patterns and
processes which influence and bring about such high level of biodiversity in the
region as a whole are poorly documented and understood.
Geographic Extent Proposal
20
Ecoregions
Essentially, biodiversity of a region is determined by climate, geology and the
evolutionary history. Intertwined influences of these characteristics lead to
formation of what scientists today refer to as “ecoregions” (Dinerstein et al.
2001). Today there are 142 terrestrial, 53 freshwater and 43 marine ecoregions
recognized across the globe (WWF 2009).
The territory of the Balkan Peninsula in this analysis occupies as many as ten
discrete ecoregions. This study of DABEO delineates the territorial extent which
excludes from the research the narrow areas of influence of five ecoregions,
namely the Pannonian mixed forest ecoregion, the Pontic steppe ecoregion of the
Danube River delta, the East European forest steppe ecoregion of the Dobruja
region, the Euxine-Colchic deciduous forests ecoregion of the northwestern
Turkey, and the Aegean and Western Turkey sclerophyllous and mixed forests
ecoregion.
Figure 5. Digital map of European ecological regions DMEER. Source: EEA 2000
Geographic Extent Proposal
21
The ecoregions which are the focus of this study are: 1) the Illyrian deciduous
forests ecoregion of the western Balkans; 2) the Dinaric Mountains mixed forests
ecoregion; 3) the Pindus Mountains mixed forests ecoregion; 4) the Balkan mixed
forests ecoregion; and 5) the Rhodope Montane mixed forests ecoregion.
The Illyrian deciduous forests
The Illyrian deciduous forests extend all along the coastal ranges of the Dinaric
Alps, from the Julian Alps in Slovenia to the northern Ionian coast between
Albania and Greece. They are primarily composed of coastal sub-Mediterranean
and meso-supra-Mediterranean downy oak forests with small units of meso-
Mediterranean Holm oak forests. Average annual rainfall is from 1500 to 2000
mm, but can exceed 3000 mm as in case of the Velebit Mountains in Dalmatia. In
winter snowfall is present as temperatures go well below zero, while summer
brings moderate average temperatures between 15°C and 20°C. Two forest
zones characterize this region of wide altitudinal range. The conifer zone is
present at the higher altitude between 1200m and 2500m, while a mixed
broadleaf zone covers lower elevations and coastal lowlands. The dominant tree
species of the mountain conifer forests are spruce (Picea abies), silver fir (Abies
alba), and black pine (Pinus nigra). Mixed fir, spruce and beech (Fagus sylvatica)
forests frequently appear all along the higher elevations and the more
continental east-facing slopes. (WWF(c) 2009)
Medium and lower altitudes are mostly populated by broadleaf beech and mixed
oak forests, while deciduous oak species display high diversity. Evergreen trees
of Holm oak and Aleppo pine, and maquis shrubs become predominant at the
lower altitudes and near the coast. (WWF(c) 2009)
This ecoregion is characterized by a very high endemism of flora, with its most
restricted distribution range in the Velebit Mountains, and a very high diversity
of bird species with large mammals also significantly present. The most
exceptional is the diversity of fauna in karst systems and related aquatic habitats
(Tvrtkovic et al. 2006).
Geographic Extent Proposal
22
The Dinaric Mountain mixed forests
The Dinaric Mountain mixed forests ecoregion encompasses the northwest-
southeast Balkan mountain ranges, from the eastern Alps to the northern
Albanian massifs. The wide altitudinal range of this ecoregion results in two
major forest zones: a coniferous zone, which characterizes the highest elevations
(average altitudinal range of 1200 to 2500 m), and a mixed broadleaf zone that
occurs at the medium elevations and lowlands. It also includes the lowland-
colline sub-continental meadow steppes and dry grassland vegetation, and
lowland-colline lime oak forests of Eastern Europe. These forests are among the
largest and most continuous tracts of forested habitat remaining for large
carnivores in Europe. The flora has a relatively high endemism rate, of about 10%
of total population, with many relict and restricted range species. Faunal
diversity is high, and a number of IBAs (Important Bird Areas) and threatened
SPECs (Species of European Concern) are included in this region (WWF (b)
2009).
The Pindus Mountains mixed forests
The Pindus Mountains mixed forests ecoregion forests are at higher elevations of
1200m to 2500m and are composed of conifer species, with mixed broadleaf
species at lower elevations. Juniper woodlands (Juniperus foetidissima) usually
define a timberline in high mountain areas of certain massifs. The dominant
canopy tree species of the mountain conifer forests are the Pallas pine (Pinus
nigra pallasiana), the endemic Greek fir (Abies cephalonica) and the hybrid
Balkan fir (Abies borisii-regis). Two rare and endemic pine species (Pinus
heldreichii and P. peuce) occur on certain mountain massifs. Climatically, the
ecoregion is characterized by an average annual rainfall of 1200 mm, but in
certain high altitudes this can be higher than 2000 mm. Snow frequently falls
during winter and minimum average temperatures are below freezing. This
region of Mediterranean forests has a very high rate of endemism second only to
the tropical Andes worldwide, with a rate of endemism of 35% within a total
mountain flora of about 4000 species. A large number of endemic and restricted
range plant species are threatened with extinction. Brown bear (Ursus arctos),
wolf (Canis lupus), and jackal (Canis aureus) populations persist in these
mountains. (WWF (d) 2009)
Geographic Extent Proposal
23
The Balkan mixed forests
The Balkan mixed forests ecoregion covers much of Bulgaria and bordering
countries. The vegetation of this ecoregion is closer to the one of Central Europe
and is characterized by Mediterranean-subcontinental thermophilous bitter oak
forests and sub-Mediterranean and meso-supra-Mediterranean downy oak
forests. Mixed oak forests are characteristic, with Quercus frainetto as the
dominant tree species. Oak forests are interspersed with pine, silver fir (Abies
alba) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) forests, woodland pastures, shrubbery
and grasslands. High valleys and sheltered slopes feature forests dominated by
beech (Fagus sylvatica) and hornbeam (Carpinus orientalis and Carpinus
betulus). (WWF(a) 2009)
The Rhodope Montane mixed forests
The Rhodope Montane mixed forests ecoregion is composed of the Balkan
Mountains and Rhodope Mountains region. Mixed deciduous forests (Fagus
sylvatica, Carpinus orientalis, Carpinus betulus, Quercus spp.) grow on
mountain slopes while the higher elevations are dominated by conifers (Abies
alba, Picea albies, Pinus nigra). On the highest peaks, forests are replaced by
heaths and alpine grasslands. It is estimated that the flora of the region includes
about 3000 vascular plant species. Many are endemics from the Pleistocene
glaciation, as the region served as a refuge for species that never re-established
themselves to the north. The position of the ecoregion at the crossroads of several
floristic elements (European, Alpine and Mediterranean) also enhances floristic
diversity. Several of Europe’s threatened fauna species are found here such as
the otter (Lutra lutra), pine marten (Martes martes), imperial eagle (Aquila
heliaca), cinereous vulture (Aegypius monachus) and ferruginous duck (Aytha
nyroca) (WWF(e) 2009).
Geographic Extent Proposal
24
Geographic Extent Proposal
The foregoing description of the distinctive geographic features of the Balkan
Peninsula implies at least two sound approaches to defining geographic extent
that would be most appropriate for the DABEO reporting process. Both the
ecoregion delineation approach and the mountain area delineation approach
have their strengths and weaknesses. Most importantly, both these approaches
provide a possibility to use readily available data in the initial process of
mapping of the entire area concerned.
The Ecoregion Delineation Approach
Out of ten discrete ecoregions present in the Balkan Peninsula, only five
ecoregions have been described. These five ecoregions are the ones that truly
capture what is unique about the Balkan Peninsula in terms of geology, climate
and biota. The ecoregions are defined by a large team of experts, making their
decisions on the basis of updated data of European climate, topography and
botany. One of the outcomes of this process was the development of the Digital
Map of European Ecological Regions (DMEER), with the objective to show the
extent of areas with relatively homogeneous ecological conditions where
comparisons and assessments of different expressions of biodiversity would be
meaningful (EEA 2000).
The DMEER maps are based on information sources of the potential vegetation
map of natural vegetation of Europe (Bonn et al. 1994), which is a final result of
an international project having the objective to generate such a map at a scale of
1:2,5 million (Ruffini et al. 2006), and topographic and climate data of the
European land (Bunce 1995) as are presented in the map of European land
classification. To understand patterns of ecology and to derive an ecological
gradient, a cluster analysis model was used to place similar samples into clusters,
which are arranged in a hierarchical tree-like structure called a dendrogram.
These clusters or classes of sorting objects represent different ecological regions,
and depending on their position on the dendrogram, or the level of aggregation,
they represent homogenous sub-ecological regions, inside the primary ecological
regions. (EEA 2000). In the final stage of the production of the Digital Map of
European Ecological Regions (DMEER), biology and geography experts
interactively decided, based on the intermediate maps, which level of the
Geographic Extent Proposal
25
dendogram would best reflect the ecological characteristics of the corresponding
locations. In search of common ground for the lines and units for the DMEER,
EEA and WWF agreed on the resulting methodology and acceptance of WWF
ecological units for the DMEER (EEA 2005, Ruffini et al. 2006).
This approach captures the distinctive features of the Balkans environment, and
it also provides a certain level of flexibility for the geographic extent definition,
as it does not rely on rigid criteria for delineation.
Figure 6. The Balkan Peninsula ecoregions.
Source: EEA 2000 Modified by: UNEP/DEWA/GRID~Europe
Another advantage of this approach is the ability to recognize and exclude areas
which are not characteristic of the Balkans region. For example, this would be
the case with the Euxine-Colchic deciduous forests ecoregion of the northwestern
Turkey, and with the East European forest steppe ecoregion of the Dobruja
Geographic Extent Proposal
26
region. The region of Dobruja is shared by Romania and Bulgaria and it
possesses unique features, as it exemplifies a biological crossroad with influences
on local flora and fauna from the north, east and south. The geology of this
region dates from an older period than the rest of the surrounding land. It is
characterized by Precambrian schists and metamorphosed sandstones, and
covered by fossiliferous Silurian limestone (Ager 1980, Reed et al. 2004). The
physical geography of the region is typified by steppe and hills, with average
altitude of 200 to 300 meters above the sea level. Even though Dobruja occupies
the furthest north-east part of the Balkan Peninsula, due to its physical and
biological characteristics it falls into the East European forest steppe ecoregion
category. Therefore, in order to truly capture the distinguishing features of the
Balkan Peninsula, this region should not be a part of the DABEO reporting
process.
On the other hand, this flexibility might prove to be a weakness for the reporting
process as it encompasses a large territory to be assessed.
The Mountain Area Delineation Approach
One of the focus areas of the DABEO reporting process is to be the high
mountain region of the Balkan Peninsula. The second proposed approach would
indeed make it possible to focus solely on the mountainous areas, and a rigid
definition (UNEP-WCMC 2002) of what constitutes a mountain territory could be
applied. However, in this case as well, there may need to be a certain level of
flexibility agreed upon.
The previously elaborated UNEP-WCMC definition of the mountain area has
been further developed and somewhat altered in order to be applied in the
process of determination and mapping of the mountains of Europe. The process
was built upon previously conducted work of UNEP-WCMC on global mapping
of mountain areas (Kapos et al. 2000). The maps are created by the use of the
GTOPO30 Digital Elevation Model (DEM), which is derived from satellite images
(Schuler et al. 2004). GTOPO30 works with a horizontal grid spacing of 30 arc
seconds (approximately 1 kilometer), and digital elevation models are also
available in 3km and 9 km resolutions (EEA 2004). This model combined with
the established criteria for low elevations (from 300m to 999m) makes what is
today widely accepted as a useful tool for scientists and decision-makers (Schuler
et al. 2004).
Geographic Extent Proposal
27
Figure 7. Mountain regions of the Balkan Peninsula
Sources: GTOPO30 from U.S. Geological Survey 1996, UNEP-WCMC 2000, UNCS 2009
However, the global mountain delineation based on altitude and slope does not
include areas at altitudes below 300 m. In the process of making the map of
European mountains, exceptions were made in situations where mountains
along the coasts extended down to sea level. Here it was decided that the
delineation should be based on a combination of altitude and topography
(Schuler et al. 2004). Below 300m, the objective is to identify areas with strong
local contrasts in the relief, such as Scottish and Norwegian fjords and
Mediterranean coastal mountain areas. Selecting areas according to the standard
deviation of elevations in close proximity to each is the best approach to include
these types of landscapes. For each point of the Digital Elevation Model, the
Geographic Extent Proposal
28
standard deviation with the 8 cardinal points surrounding it was calculated. If
this standard deviation is 50 meters or greater, the landscape is sufficiently rough
to be considered as mountainous, despite the low altitude (Schuler et al. 2004).
This will prove to be the case with the mountain ranges of the Balkans as well, in
the coastal areas along the Adriatic Sea (one example is Lovcen in Montenegro),
and along the Albanian and Greek coasts of the Ionian and the Aegean Seas.
Also, in the process of delineation of European mountains, isolated mountainous
areas of less than five km2 were not considered. On the other hand, non-
mountainous areas within mountain massifs were included. This was done in
order to create more continuous areas (Schuler et al. 2004).
In order to define a fully contiguous geographic extent for the DABEO reporting
process supplementing the one presented in figure 6, an extension of the area via
use of municipal boundaries could be utilized. In the case of Europe, the
mountain area was approximated to municipal boundaries. First, an assessment
was made of the proportion of each municipality falling into the mountain
delineation, derived from the analysis based on the above-mentioned criteria. To
be considered as mountainous, a municipality had to have at least 50% of its area
within the area delimited as mountainous (Schuler et al. 2004). In the case of the
Dinaric Arc and Balkans, this methodology could also be used, or could be
further discussed by the relevant actors. This approximation would also
facilitate allocation of administrative resources and indicate relevant local actors
in the DABEO reporting process.
Finally, the proposed geographic extent for the DABEO study could also be
based on a combination of the two approaches, or simply put, on an overlay of
the criteria defining the mountainous region and the ecoregion delimitation.
Geographic Extent Proposal
29
Bibliography
Ager, D. V. (1980). Geology of Europe. Mcgraw Hill Book Co Ltd.
Albrecht, C., & Wilke, T. (2008). Ancient Lake Ohrid: biodiversity and evolution.
Hydrobiologia, 615(1), 103-140.
Andonovski, V., & Pop-Stojanov, D. (2006). Cooperation for the Protection and
Sustainable Development of Mountain Regions in South Eastern Europe:
Assessment of Baseline, Needs and Opportunities. Balkan Foundation for
Sustainable Development.
Bunce, R. G. H., Metzger, M. J., Jongman, R. H. G., Brandt, J., Blust, G., Elena-
Rossello, R., et al. (2008). A standardized procedure for surveillance and
monitoring European habitats and provision of spatial data. Landscape
Ecology, 23(1), 11-25.
Bunce, R. (1995). A European land Classification. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology,
Merlewood.
Cooper, A., McCann, T., & Bunce, R. G. H. (2006). The influence of sampling
intensity on vegetation classification and the implications for
environmental management. Environmental conservation, 33(2), 118-127.
Danielopol, D. L., Griebler, C., Gunatilaka, A., & Notenboom, J. (2003). Present
state and future prospects for groundwater ecosystems. Environmental
conservation, 30(2), 104-130.
Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E., Burgess, N., Powell, G., Underwood, E. C.,
D’Amico, J., et al. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of
life on earth. BioScience, 51(11), 933-938.
Eastwood, W. (2004). East Mediterranean Vegetation and Climate Change. In
Balkan Biodiversity. Pattern and process in the European Hotspot. (pp. 9-22).
Dordrecht: Kluwer.
EEA - Data - Digital elevation model of Europe. (n.d.). . Retrieved October 19,
2009, from
http://dataservice.eea.europa.eu/dataservice/metadetails.asp?id=650.
Geographic Extent Proposal
30
EEA - Data - Digital map of european ecological regions. (n.d.). . Retrieved
October 19, 2009, from
http://dataservice.eea.europa.eu/dataservice/metadetails.asp?id=192.
Griffiths, H. I., Kryštufek, B., & Reed, J. M. (2004). Balkan biodiversity (p. 357).
Springer.
Grove, A. T., & Rackham, O. (2003). The nature of Mediterranean Europe (p. 384).
Yale University Press.
IUCN. (1995). The mountains of Central and Eastern Europe. English. Gland,
Switzerland: IUCN.
Jongman, R. H. G., Bunce, R. G. H., Metzger, M. J., Mücher, C. A., Howard, D. C.,
& Mateus, V. L. (2006). Objectives and Applications of a Statistical
Environmental Stratification of Europe. Landscape Ecology, 21(3), 409-419.
Kruckeberg, A. R. (2004). Geology and Plant Life: The Effects of Landforms and Rock
Types on Plants. University of Washington Press.
Kryštufek, B., & Reed, J. M. (2004). Pattern and Process in Balkan Biodiversity: an
overview. In Balkan Biodiversity. Pattern and process in the European Hotspot.
(pp. 1-8). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Matvejev, S., & Puncer, I. (1961). Map of Biomes. Landscapes of Yugoslavia and
their protection. Natural History Museum in Belgrade, 36.
McNeill, J. R. (2003). The Mountains of the Mediterranean World (p. 448). Cambridge
University Press.
Metzger, M., Bunce, R., Leemans, R., & Viner, D. (2008). Projected environmental
shifts under climate change: European trends and regional impacts.
Environmental conservation - Foundation for Environmental Conservation,
35(1), 64-75.
Metzger, M. J., Bunce, R. G. H., Jongman, R. H. G., Mucher, C. A., & Watkins, J.
W. (2005). A climatic stratification of the environment of Europe. Global
Ecology and Biogeography, 14(6), 549-563.
Moores, E. M., & Fairbridge, R. W. (1997). Encyclopedia of European and Asian
regional geology (p. 804). Springer.
Geographic Extent Proposal
31
Mrsic, N. (1997). Biotic diversity in Slovenia (p. 129 p). Ljubljana: Government of
Slovenia.
Mucher, C., Hennekens, S., Bunce, R., Schaminee, J., & Schaepman, M. (2009).
Modelling the spatial distribution of Natura 2000 habitats across Europe.
Landscape and Urban Planning, 92(2), 148-159.
Neuhäuslová, Z., & Bohn, U. (1993). Vegetation Map of Europe: Current State.
Folia Geobotanica & Phytotaxonomica, 28(2), 211-214.
Perko, D. (2004). Slovenia at the Junction of Major European Geographical Units.
Association of the Geographical Societies of Slovenia: Založba ZRC.
Perko, D. (1998). Regionalization of Slovenia. Geografski institut Antona Melika
ZRC SAZU.
Price, M. F., & Butt, N. (2000). Forests in Sustainable Mountain Development: A State
of Knowledge Report for 2000: Task Force on Forests in Sustainable Mountain
Development (Har/Map.). CABI.
Reed, J. M., Kryštufek, B., & Eastwood, W. (2004). Physical geography of the
Balkans and nomenclature of place names.
In Balkan Biodiversity. Pattern and process in the European Hotspot. (pp. 9-
22). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Regato, P. (2001). The Mediterranean forests. A new conservation strategy. WWF.
Robertson, A., & Dixon, J. (1984). Introduction: aspects of the geological
evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean. Geological Society, London, Special
Publications, 17, 1-74.
Ruffini, F. V., Streifender, T., & Eiselt, B. (2006). Implementing an international
mountain convention - An approach for the delimitation of the Carpathian
Conventionarea. European Academy Bolzano.
Schuler, M., Stucki, E., Roque, O., & Perlik, M. (2004). Mountain Areas in Europe :
Analysis of mountain areas in EU member states, acceding and other European
countries.
Sket, B. (1999). The nature of biodiversity in hypogean waters and how it is
endangered. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8(10), 1319-1338.
Geographic Extent Proposal
32
Skoulikidis, N. (2009). The environmental state of rivers in the Balkans-A review
within the DPSIR framework. Science of The Total Environment, 407(8),
2501-2516.
Stankovic, S. (1960). The Balkan Lake Ohrid and its living world. Monographiae
biologicae ; vol.9. The Hague :: Junk.
The World Bank. (2008). Lake Skadar-Shkoder Integrated Ecosystem
Management Project. West Balkans Country Management Unit.
Tvrtkovic, N., & Veen, P. (2006). The Dinaric Alps Rare Habitats and Species: A
Nature Conservation Project in Croatia . Hrvatski prirodoslovni muzej
Zagreb (CNHM) and Royal Dutch Society for Nature Conservation
(KNNV) .
Tykot, R. H. (1998). A geological companion to Greece and the Aegean.
Geoarchaeology, 13(4), 419-420.
UNDP. (2007). Environmental Policy in South-Eastern Europe. UNDP.
UNEP Vienna. (2009). Potential for the establishment of the sub-regional network
of mountain protected areas in the Balkans and the Dinaric Arc. UNEP
Vienna ISCC.
UNEP Vienna ISCC . (2006). Enhancing Trans-boundary Biodiversity Management in
South Eastern Europe.
UNEP/GRID-Arendal. (2007). Balkan Vital Graphics. Environment without
Borders.
UNEP-WCMC. (2002). Mountain Watch: environmental change and sustainable
development in mountains. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring
Centre.
WWF. (2009). WWF - Science - Ecoregions. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from
http://www.worldwildlife.org/science/ecoregions/item1847.html.
WWFa. (2009). Terrestrial Ecoregions -- Balkan mixed forests (PA0404). Retrieved
October 19, 2009, from
http://www.worldwildlife.org/wildworld/profiles/terrestrial/pa/pa040
4_full.html.
Geographic Extent Proposal
33
WWFb. (2009). Terrestrial Ecoregions -- Dinaric Mountains mixed forests
(PA0418). Retrieved October 19, 2009, from
http://www.worldwildlife.org/wildworld/profiles/terrestrial/pa/pa041
8_full.html.
WWFc. (2009). Terrestrial Ecoregions -- Illyrian deciduous forests (PA1210).
Retrieved October 19, 2009, from
http://www.worldwildlife.org/wildworld/profiles/terrestrial/pa/pa121
0_full.html.
WWFd. (2009). Terrestrial Ecoregions -- Pindus Mountains mixed forests
(PA1217). Retrieved October 19, 2009, from
http://www.worldwildlife.org/wildworld/profiles/terrestrial/pa/pa121
7_full.html.
WWFe. (2009). Terrestrial Ecoregions -- Rodope montane mixed forests (PA0435).
Retrieved October 19, 2009, from
http://www.worldwildlife.org/wildworld/profiles/terrestrial/pa/pa043
5_full.html.