united scientific groupunitedscientificgroup.com/journals/ets/articles/v1n1/... · web viewtable of...
TRANSCRIPT
Supplementary Materials for ‘Alpha hyperconnectivity and atypical memory processing in soldiers with PTSD’
Figure S1. 90 cortical and subcortical seed regions derived from the AAL atlas (Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002) that were used in the beamformer reconstruction.
1Dunkley, et al.
Table S1. AAL seed regions (Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002).
Region x y zPrecentral.L -40 -6 51Precentral.R 40 -8 52Frontal.Sup.L -19 35 42Frontal.Sup.R 20 31 44Frontal.Sup.Orb.L -18 47 -13Frontal.Sup.Orb.R 17 48 -14Frontal.Mid.L -34 33 35Frontal.Mid.R 37 33 34Frontal.Mid.Orb.L -32 50 -10Frontal.Mid.Orb.R 32 53 -11Frontal.Inf.Oper.L -49 13 19Frontal.Inf.Oper.R 49 15 21Frontal.Inf.Tri.L -47 30 14Frontal.Inf.Tri.R 49 30 14Frontal.Inf.Orb.L -37 31 -12Frontal.Inf.Orb.R 40 32 -12Rolandic.Oper.L -48 -8 14Rolandic.Oper.R 52 -6 15Supp.Motor.Area.L -6 5 61Supp.Motor.Area.R 8 0 62Olfactory.L -9 15 -12Olfactory.R 8 16 -11Frontal.Sup.Medial.L -6 49 31Frontal.Sup.Medial.R 8 51 30Frontal.Med.Orb.L -6 54 -7Frontal.Med.Orb.R 7 52 -7Rectus.L -6 37 -18Rectus.R 7 36 -18Insula.L -36 7 3Insula.R 38 6 2Cingulum.Ant.L -5 35 14Cingulum.Ant.R 7 37 16Cingulum.Mid.L -6 -15 42Cingulum.Mid.R 7 -9 40Cingulum.Post.L -6 -43 25Cingulum.Post.R 6 -42 22Hippocampus.L -26 -21 -10Hippocampus.R 28 -20 -10
2Dunkley, et al.
ParaHippocampal.L -22 -16 -21ParaHippocampal.R 24 -15 -20Amygdala.L -24 -1 -17Amygdala.R 26 1 -18Calcarine.L -8 -79 6Calcarine.R 15 -73 9Cuneus.L -7 -80 27Cuneus.R 13 -79 28Lingual.L -16 -68 -5Lingual.R 15 -67 -4Occipital.Sup.L -18 -84 28Occipital.Sup.R 23 -81 31Occipital.Mid.L -33 -81 16Occipital.Mid.R 36 -80 19Occipital.Inf.L -37 -78 -8Occipital.Inf.R 37 -82 -8Fusiform.L -32 -40 -20Fusiform.R 33 -39 -20Postcentral.L -43 -23 49Postcentral.R 40 -25 53Parietal.Sup.L -24 -60 59Parietal.Sup.R 25 -59 62Parietal.Inf.L -44 -46 47Parietal.Inf.R 45 -46 50SupraMarginal.L -57 -34 30SupraMarginal.R 57 -32 34Angular.L -45 -61 36Angular.R 45 -60 39Precuneus.L -8 -56 48Precuneus.R 9 -56 44Paracentral.Lobule.L -9 -25 70Paracentral.Lobule.R 6 -32 68Caudate.L -12 11 9Caudate.R 14 12 9Putamen.L -25 4 2Putamen.R 27 5 2Pallidum.L -19 0 0Pallidum.R 20 0 0Thalamus.L -12 -18 8Thalamus.R 12 -18 8Heschl.L -43 -19 10
3Dunkley, et al.
Heschl.R 45 -17 10Temporal.Sup.L -54 -21 7Temporal.Sup.R 57 -22 7Temporal.Pole.Sup.L -41 15 -20Temporal.Pole.Sup.R 47 15 -17Temporal.Mid.L -57 -34 -2Temporal.Mid.R 56 -37 -1Temporal.Pole.Mid.L -37 15 -34Temporal.Pole.Mid.R 43 15 -32Temporal.Inf.L -51 -28 -23Temporal.Inf.R 53 -31 -22
4Dunkley, et al.
Figure S2. Group-mean, whole-brain connectivity strength times series for the theta, beta, gamma and high gamma band in encoding and recognition trials during the working memory task (-0.2 to 0.8 seconds, stimulus appears at 0 time point; PTSD in blue, control in green, ±1 standard error bars, difference in red).
5Dunkley, et al.
Table S2 & S3. Table of significant connectivity differences for encoding trials in the working memory task, 50-150 ms and 150-250 ms, for nodes greater than degree of 2.
50-150 ms
Region x y Z DegreeRolandic.Oper.L -47.16 -8.48 13.95 16Frontal.Sup.Orb.L -16.56 47.32 -13.31 7Rectus.L -5.08 37.07 -18.14 7Postcentral.L -42.46 -22.63 48.92 6SupraMarginal.L -55.79 -33.64 30.45 5Supp.Motor.Area.L -5.32 4.85 61.38 4Supp.Motor.Area.R 8.62 0.17 61.85 4Cingulum.Mid.R 8.02 -8.83 39.79 4Hippocampus.L -25.03 -20.74 -10.13 4Lingual.L -14.62 -67.56 -4.63 4Fusiform.L -31.16 -40.3 -20.23 4Thalamus.L -10.85 -17.56 7.98 4Precentral.R 41.37 -8.21 52.09 3Frontal.Sup.Orb.R 18.49 48.1 -14.02 3ParaHippocampal.R 25.38 -15.15 -20.47 3Occipital.Inf.R 38.16 -81.99 -7.61 3Postcentral.R 41.43 -25.49 52.55 3
150-250 ms
Region x y z DegreeThalamus.L -10.85 -17.56 7.98 7Rolandic.Oper.L -47.16 -8.48 13.95 6ParaHippocampal.L -21.17 -15.95 -20.7 5Hippocampus.L -25.03 -20.74 -10.13 4Hippocampus.R 29.23 -19.78 -10.33 4Precuneus.L -7.24 -56.07 48.01 4Temporal.Mid.L -55.52 -33.8 -2.2 4Frontal.Sup.Orb.L -16.56 47.32 -13.31 3Frontal.Inf.Oper.L -48.43 12.73 19.02 3Frontal.Inf.Tri.L -45.58 29.91 13.99 3Fusiform.R 33.97 -39.1 -20.18 3Postcentral.L -42.46 -22.63 48.92 3Heschl.R 45.86 -17.15 10.41 3
6Dunkley, et al.
Table S4. Table for significant regions in the recognition trials for the working memory task, 150-250 ms, for nodes greater than degree of 2.
Region x y z DegreeOlfactory.R 10.43 15.91 -11.26 7ParaHippocampal.L -21.17 -15.95 -20.7 7Precuneus.R 9.98 -56.05 43.77 6ParaHippocampal.R 25.38 -15.15 -20.47 5Amygdala.R 27.32 0.64 -17.5 5Temporal.Inf.R 53.69 -31.07 -22.32 5Frontal.Sup.Medial.R 9.1 50.84 30.22 4Pallidum.R 21.2 0.18 0.23 4Frontal.Inf.Orb.L -35.98 30.71 -12.11 3Occipital.Inf.L -36.36 -78.29 -7.84 3
7Dunkley, et al.
Figure S3. Group-mean, whole-brain connectivity strength times series for the theta, beta, gamma and high gamma band during war-related and neutral trials in the long-term recognition task (-0.2 to 0.8 seconds, stimulus appears at 0 time point; PTSD in blue, control in green, ±1 standard error bars, difference in red).
8Dunkley, et al.
Table S5. For war-related trials in the long-term recognition task, 50-150 ms, for nodes greater than degree of 2.
Region x y z DegreeOccipital.Sup.L -16.54 -84.26 28.17 12Rectus.R 8.35 35.64 -18.04 8Cuneus.L -5.93 -80.13 27.22 7Rolandic.Oper.R 52.65 -6.25 14.63 5Olfactory.R 10.43 15.91 -11.26 5Amygdala.R 27.32 0.64 -17.5 5Heschl.R 45.86 -17.15 10.41 5Temporal.Pole.Mid.R 44.22 14.55 -32.23 5Postcentral.L -42.46 -22.63 48.92 4Temporal.Sup.L -53.16 -20.68 7.13 4Temporal.Mid.R 57.47 -37.23 -1.47 4Precuneus.R 9.98 -56.05 43.77 3Pallidum.L -17.75 -0.03 0.21 3
9Dunkley, et al.
Table S6. For neutral trials in the long-term recognition task, 50-150 ms, for nodes greater than degree of 2.
50-150 ms
Region x y z DegreeFrontal.Inf.Oper.L -48.43 12.73 19.02 7Supp.Motor.Area.R 8.62 0.17 61.85 7Parietal.Inf.R 46.46 -46.29 49.54 6Heschl.L -41.99 -18.88 9.98 4Temporal.Pole.Mid.R 44.22 14.55 -32.23 4Thalamus.L -10.85 -17.56 7.98 4Frontal.Inf.Tri.L -45.58 29.91 13.99 3Calcarine.L -7.14 -78.67 6.44 3Occipital.Sup.R 24.29 -80.85 30.59 3Postcentral.L -42.46 -22.63 48.92 3SupraMarginal.R 57.61 -31.5 34.48 3
10Dunkley, et al.