united states fleet forces ready fleet … global reach 1 surface ship maintenance program brief for...

United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Ready Fleet … Global ReachReady Fleet … Global Reach 1

Surface Ship Maintenance ProgramSurface Ship Maintenance Programbrief for brief for

Virginia Ship Repair AssociationVirginia Ship Repair Association

CAPT Mike StantonCAPT Mike StantonUSFF N431USFF N43122 APR 2009

UNCLASS


OverviewOverview

• USFF Fleet Maintenance Directorate

• Program objectives:

– ‘Planned Service Life’ view of Maintenance

– Areas of responsibility

• Strategic Maintenance Process:

– Requirements & programming

– Maintenance execution planning

– Maintenance execution

Improve process stability; Reduce process variation


USFF N43 Maintenance DirectorateUSFF N43 Maintenance Directorate

N43 Fleet Maint Officer RADM(s) Joe Campbell

(prospective) FMO RADM(s) Clark Orzalli (May)

N43B Deputy FMO Mr. Bob Butler

N431 Surface Ship Maint Prog Mgr CAPT Mike Stanton

(prospective) CAPT Stephanie Douglas

N432 Submarine Maint Prog Mgr CDR Greg Burton

N433 Aviation Maint Prog Mgr CAPT Dave Seaton

N434 Technical & Process Prog Mgr Mr. Dale Hirschman

N435 Financial & Industrial Mgt Mr. Glenn Hottel

N436 C5I Branch Head CDR Drew Lambley (IA)

N437 Maint Information Sys Mgt Mrs. Maureen Ransom

N438 CVN Maint Prog Mgr CAPT Lloyd Jones


Surface Ship Maintenance Program: Surface Ship Maintenance Program: Focus on Achieving Service LifeFocus on Achieving Service Life

Requirement: ensure material condition of ships supports Ao, presence requirements & achieves planned service life.

– 157 Surface Ships, 11 classes

– 11 CSG, 10 ESG, various SNGs & surge reqts

• Support current and future readiness:

Ao,overall = Ao,FRP + Ao,Lifecycle

Priorities

1. 313 ship Navy: must achieve planned service life for ships in inventory

• 49% of surface force service life has been consumed

2. Stabilizing & refining maintenance requirements

3. Developing & deploying sound maintenance practices, processes & strategies

Significant Congressional interest in the readiness of the Surface Force


N431 Areas of ResponsibilityN431 Areas of Responsibility

Current Readiness

• Availability execution in support of FRP

• Ships with marginal material condition

• Hi-interest INSURVs

• New Construction readiness (LPD 17, LCS)

Future Readiness

• Breadth & technical rigor of lifecycle maint reqts

• Programming strategies and risk decisions

• Availability risk assessment and mitigation

• New Construction readiness

Maint Acquisition Mgt

• MSMO Program

– Acqn Strat IPT

– AFEBs

• Maint Contracting Strategies

• Maintenance execution strategies and policies

• Industry Relations

– JINII, VSRA, JASRA

FMBoD “locked-in” on Surface Ship Maintenance Program


Strategic Maintenance Process Strategic Maintenance Process

RequirementsDevelopment

(TYCOM, FFC)

Programming& Budgeting

(FFC, OPNAV)

Appropriation &Apportionment

(Congress, FMB)

Planning(RMC & MSMO)

Execution(RMC & MSMO)

Var

iati

on

Process stage

Savings Potential

- Risk decisionstoward “PSL+”- Industrial basepreservation

- MSMO Spiral 2 - SHIPMAIN- Assessments- Level-loading

Targeted strategies

-Reqts Realism: MRS- ICMP development

- MSMO stabilization - Contracts Governance- Depot work integration- RMC standardization




(TYCOM, FFC)


(FFC, OPNAV)


(Congress, FMB)



Var

iati

on

Process stage

Savings Potential



Targeted strategies




Requirements ImprovementRequirements Improvement

• January 2009 Surface Ship Maint Strategic Offsite– Must strengthen requirements determination process for ships

– CLASSRON: focus on lifecycle maintenance to feed programming

Actions• Maintenance Requirements System (MRS) Alliance

– Availability notionals “tailoring” projects

– Modified docking cycles

– “Aged” notionals

– Parametric analysis

• Surface Ship Life Cycle Management Activity (SSLCM)

– ICMP improvement

– Standardized availability work packages

• ABS Hull-life Surveys (NAVSEA 05)

under review

“technical rigor”


Maint Requirements AdjustmentsMaint Requirements Adjustments

“Aged” Notionals

• Automobile maint concept – older assets require increasing maint

– Gradually increase the notionals as the vessel consumes service life

– Basis for CVN Maint Op-cycle Mgt & availability resourcing levels

– Easily understood by Pentagon programmers

DSRA-1

EDSRA-2

DSRA-3

Mdays/avail

PSA SRA-1 SRA-1 SRA-2 SRA-2 SRA-3 SRA-3 SRA-4 SRA-4

Under study




(TYCOM, FFC)


(FFC, OPNAV)


(Congress, FMB)



Var

iati

on

Process stage

Savings Potential



Targeted strategies




Programming ConsiderationsProgramming Considerations

• Meeting maintenance requirements since 2003 with baseline funding plus supplemental appropriations

– How to transition out of supplementals yet still secure needed funding(?)

– Fiscal policies of new administration….

• How is risk managed against shortfalls

– Preserve industrial base vs. service life risk?

• Phasing with major modernization programs

• Full funding vs. timing of funding

• Measurements tricky:

– Near term effects and long-term effects




(TYCOM, FFC)


(FFC, OPNAV)


(Congress, FMB)



Var

iati

on

Process stage

Savings Potential



Targeted strategies




Execution PlanningExecution Planning

• Incremental improvements in MSMO Spiral 2

• MCIT replaces SHIPMAIN

– Focused on avail planning & execution performance

• What of “assessments”?

– Re-institute shipboard assessments to facilitate avail planning

• SSLCM: ICMP deploying BAWPs & AWPs

• Expanding role of MFOM

– Valuating lifecycle maintenance actions

• Port-loading considerations (source of variation)

• Technical requirements clarification & stabilization




(TYCOM, FFC)


(FFC, OPNAV)


(Congress, FMB)



Var

iati

on

Process stage

Savings Potential



Targeted strategies




Maintenance ExecutionMaintenance Execution

• MSMO

–Over-arching objective: stabilize MSMO

• Permits contractor focus, commitment, repetition, improvement

–Incremental improvements for MSMO Spiral 2

• Beneficial to Navy and industry

• Comprehensive Contracting Strategy

–Contracts Governance Process

–Depot Work Integration


-

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

$M

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Av

g D

ay

s p

er

Yr Maint $M

OPTEMPO Actual(Avg Days per Yr)

Navy initiates FRP

MSMO Results: MSMO Results: Readiness vs. Maint InvestmentReadiness vs. Maint Investment

Increased steaming at same maint investment levels: MSMO enabling FRP

Large increase in steaming days/yr 2004-2008 (HOA, APS, POA, HADR, etc.)

Start MSMO

CNO Clark: “buy-down maint backlog” (2003)

Steaming days/yr/ship


MSMO Results: Contract PerformanceMSMO Results: Contract Performance

• Cost: rates stable, affordable, and w/i programmed levels

– Cumulative cost performance (thru FY08): ~ 4% cost under-run, all contracts,

all performance periods

• Schedule: response to current readiness exceptional – supports FRP

– >200 CNO MSMO availabilities – 1 late due to contractor performance

– Incorporation of change scope w/o sked impact significant (range 15-30%)

• Technical performance solid & improving

– Govt QA-point reject rate ~ 2%

• Partnership: All MSMOs productively engaged

in many Navy initiatives

1st-order MSMO program objectives being met 0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

3.50%

Award FeePeriod 1

Award FeePeriod 2

Award FeePeriod 3

Award FeePeriod 4

Award FeePeriod 5

Award FeePeriod 6

Award FeePeriod 7

Observation Period

Av

era

ge

Re

jec

tio

n P

erc

en

tag

e f

or

all

Co

ntr

ac

tors

QA Reject trends


MSMO Controls, Oversight, GovernanceMSMO Controls, Oversight, Governance

MSMO success due to:

• All contracts issued under proper Navy contract & technical warrants

• Contract stability: focus, investment, process improvement

• RMC exercising contractual authorities

• DCAA periodic cost audits

• Award fee evaluation boards – frequent feedback & accountability

• Standing MSMO Acqn IPT providing dynamic review & adjustment

• Rigorous oversight by ASN(RDA)

– Balancing competition, performance incentives, stability

– Approved additional contract strengthening in MSMO Spiral 2 (FY10-14)

• Navy submitting report to Congress in FY10 Budget Request substantiating rationale for executing DDG Modernization w/ MSMO

Many pieces contributing to overall program strength


Update: Comprehensive Contracting & Update: Comprehensive Contracting & Depot Work IntegrationDepot Work Integration

Policy for Comprehensive Contracting and Depot Work Integration

– Approved by ASN(RDA) 27 March 2009

– Enabling instructions & policies implemented JFMM Ch 7A (30 Jun 08)

• Key elements/enablers

– All work coincident to depot availabilities shall be planned, integrated and coordinated through the NSA using the LMA as the planning agent

– LMAs shall have first opportunity to execute all depot work for which they have organic capability, capacity and cost reasonableness

• Programs shall budget for reasonable depot installation costs

– AITs shall execute AIT-unique work, and can execute depot installation work if the LMA does not meet the aforementioned requirements

– NSAs shall remain the single authoritative voice to equitably resolve availability disputes and disruptions amongst all customers

Policy successfully executed on several major CNO availabilities


Comprehensive Contracting & Depot Work IntegrationComprehensive Contracting & Depot Work IntegrationOverviewOverview

Enablers: - SY-AIT SWT 897-04 - 1 June 08 JFMM update - ASN Policy directive

Enablers: - 2004 FISC/SUP/Fleet/SEA/MOU - USFF 201411ZJUL06

- USFF 211431ZJUN07 - USFF 271300ZMAR08

- 30 June 2008 JFMM update - NAVSEA SEAPORT-e Policy

- ASN Policy directive

Comprehensive Contracting & Depot Work IntegrationComprehensive Contracting & Depot Work Integration

Comprehensive Contracting Strategy

Maint, Modernization& AIT Integration

• Inclusive & balanced planning• End-to-end avail mgt• Single authority for conflict resolution

Portfolio ofShipboardProductionContracts

Contracts Governance

Oversight Process


Questions?Questions?

united states fleet forces ready fleet … global reach 1 surface ship maintenance program brief for...

Documents