united states vs. city of derby
TRANSCRIPT
8/10/2019 United States vs. City of Derby
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/united-states-vs-city-of-derby 1/7
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT
OF CONNECTICUT
UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA
P l a i n t i f f ,
v .
CITYOF
DERBY CONNECTICUT
D e f e n d a n t .
C i v i l
A c t i o n
No.
COMPLAINT
The n i t e d S t a t e s of merica,
y
u t h o r i t y o f ' t h e
A t t o r n e y
G e n e r a l of
h e
U n i t e d Stags
and
h r o u g h
t h e
u n d e r s i g n e d
a t t o r n e y s ,
a c t i n g a t
t h e
r e q u e s t
of
h e
A d m i n i s t r a t o r of
h e
United
t a t e s
Environmental
r o t e c t i o n
Agency `BPA ),
i l e s
t h i s
complaint and
l l e g e s
a s
f o l l o w s :
NATURE
OF
THE ACTION
L This s a
i v i l a c t i o n u n d e r S e c t i o n s 107(a)
nd
1 1 3 ( g ) ( 2 ) of h e
Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, nd
L i a b i l i t y A c t ,
a s amended
CERCLA ), 2
U.S.C. §§
960~(a)
nd 6 1 3 ( g ) ( 2 ) .
I n
t h i s
a c t i o n ,
t h e
U n i t e d S t a t e s
s e e k s c ~
r e c o v e r
c o s t s
i n c u r r e d
and o
be n c u r r e d by
e U n i t e d S t a t e s i n
c o n d u c t i n g a c t i o n s
i n r e s p o n s e t o
r e l e a s e s
o r
t h r e a t e n e d r e l e a s e
of azardous u b s t a n c e s
a t o r
from
h e O ' S u l l i v a n ' s I s l a n d
Superfund S i t e
( S i t e )
l o c a t e d i n
t h e C i t y
of
Derby,
County
of
New
aven,
o n n e c t i c u t .
SDIGTION AND
VENUE
2 .
T h i s
C c > u r t
has
u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r t h e s u b j e c t m a t t e r of
h i s
a c t i o n and
over h e
p a z
t i e s
p u ~ • s u a n t
t o 2$ U,S,C. §§
1331
and
1345, nd
S e c t i o n 113(b) fCERCLA 2
U,S.C,
Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 1 Filed 10/28/14 Page 1 of 7
8/10/2019 United States vs. City of Derby
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/united-states-vs-city-of-derby 2/7
§
613
b ) .
3 . Venue s
p r o p e r i n
t h i s
j u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t
p u r s u a n t
t o 2$
U.S.C. §
1391
and
S e c t i o n
113{b)
of
CERCLA
2 U.S.C. §
61
( b ) ,
b e c a u s e t h e
c l a i m s
a r o s e
i n
t h i s
d i s t r i c t
t h e
r e l e a s e
o r
t h r e a t e n e d
r e l e a s e
of
azardous
u b s t a n c e s o c c u r r e d
i n t h i s
d i s t r i c t
a n d .
h e
S i t e
i s
l o c a t e d
i n t h i s
d i s t r i c t .
DEFENDANT
4 . Defendant
C i t y of erby
Derby ) s a m u n i c i p a l
c o r p o r a t i o n c r e a t e d , o r g a n i z e d
and
e x i s t i n g
u n d e r t h e laws of h e
S t a t e of
o n n e c t i c u t , and a
o l i t i c a l
s u b d i v i s i o n of
h e S t a t e
of
C o n n e c t i c u t .
5 . Derby s a
p e r s o n
w i t h i n t h e meaning of e c t i o n
101(21)
ofCERCLA
2 U.S.C.
9 6 0 1 ( 2 1 ) .
STATUTORYFR~M~WORK
6 .
CERCLA
a s
n a c t e d
i n 1980
o
p r o v i d e
a
comprehensive
governmental
mechanism f o r
a b a t i n g
r e l e a s e s
and
h r e a t e n e d
r e l e a s e s of a z a r d o u s
s u b s t a n c e s
and o t h e r
p o l l u t a n t s
and
c o n t a m i n a n t s
and
f o r
funding
h e
c o s t s
of
uch abat ement and
r e l a t e d
enforcement
c t i v i t i e s ,
which a r e
known s
r e s p o n s e
a c t i o n s . 42
U.S.C.
§§
6 0 4 ( a ) ,
9 6 0 1 ( 2 5 ) .
7 .
Under
S e c t i o n 1 0 4 { a ) ( 1 )
of
CERCLA s
amended,
whenever any
hazardous u b s t a n c e
i s
r e l e a s e d i n t o t h e environment,
r
t h e r e
i s
a
u b s t a n t i a l .
t h r e a t
of
uch
a
r e l e a s e i n t o
t h e
environment,
h e
P r e s i d e n t i s a u t h o r i z e d t o
a c t ,
c o n s i s t e n t
w i t h t h e
N a t i o n a l
Contingency
P l a n , o
remove o r a r r a n g e
f o r s
t h e
removal
of h e h a z a r d o u s s u b s t a n c e .
42
U.S.C.
9 6 0 4 ( a ) ( 1 ) .
8 . Far
CERCLA
e s p o n s e
a c t i o n s
and
enforcement p u r p o s e s ,
t h e
A d m i n i s t i ° a t o r of
LPA
s
t h e
P r e s i d e n t s
d e l e g a t e , a s
p z ~ o v i d e d i n
o p e r a t i v e
E x e c u t i v e
O r d e r s . .
Within
c e r t a i n
l i m i t s , t h e
EPA
d m ~ i n i s t a
a t o r
has
e - d e l e g a t e d
t h i s
a u t h o r i t y
t o
f h e
EPA
egional
d m i n i s t r a t o r s .
2
Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 1 Filed 10/28/14 Page 2 of 7
8/10/2019 United States vs. City of Derby
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/united-states-vs-city-of-derby 3/7
9 . S e c t i o n 1 0 7 ( a )
ofCERCLA r o v i d e s :
a j N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g
any o t h e r
p r o v i s i o n
o r
r u l e
of
a w , .
and
s u b j e c t o n l y
t o
t h e
d e f e n s e s
s e t
f o r t h i n
s u b s e c t i o n
{b)
f h i s
s e c t i o n
(1)
t h e
owner
and
o p e r a t o r
of
v e s s e l
o r
a
a c i l i t y ,
(2) any
p e r s o n .
who
a t t h e
tune
of
i s p o s a l
of any
h a z a r d o u s
s u b s t a n c e
owned
o r
o p e r a t e d
any f a c i l i t y
a t ~ w h i c h such h a z a r d o u s s u b s t a n c e s were d i s p o s e d
o f ,
...from which t h e r e i s
a e l e a s e ,
o r
a t h r e a t e n e d
r e l e a s e
which
c a u s e s t h e
i n c u r r e n c e
of
e s p o n s e
c o s t s ,
of
a h a z a r d o u s
s u b s t a n c e , s h a l l be
i a b l e
f o r
A)
a l l
c o s t s
of
removal
o r
r e m e d i a l
a c t i o n
i n c u r r e d by
t h e U n i t e d
S t a t e s
Government
...not
n c o n s i s t e n t
w i t h
t h e
n a t i o n a l
c o n t i n g e n c y
p l a n ; ..
42
U.S.C. ~
9 6 0 7 { a ) .
SITE DESCRIPTION AND
FACTUAL
BACKGROUND
1 0 .
The seven- a c r e O S u l l i v a n s
I s l a n d
S i t e i s l o c a t e d on a p e n i n s u l a
a t
t h e
c o n f l u e n c e
of
t h e Housatonic
and
Naugatuck
R i v e r s
i r 1
Derby,
o n n e c t i c u t .
1 1 .
I n
1983, u r i e d
55- g a l l o n
drums
were d i s c o v e r e d a t
t h e
S i t e ,
l e a d i n g
EPA o
conduct
two
removal
a c t i o n s
under
CERCL~1
v e r atwo-year p e r i o d . I n
t h e
f i r s t
conducted l a t e r
i n
19 3,
EPA
emoved
a p p r o x i m a t e l y
200 drums
c o n t a i n i n g
h a z a r d o u s s u b s t a n c e s .
Between
September
1984
and
J a n u a r y
1985,EPA onducted a second
r e m o v a l .
a c t i o n
d u r i n g which t
d i s p o s e d of
p p r o x i m a t e l y 700
d d i t i o n a l
drums c o n t a m i n a t e d w i t h o r
c o 7 7 t a i n i n g h a z a r d o u s
s u b s t a n c e s .
EPA n c u r r e d a p p r o x i m a t e l y
310,000 n
r e s p o n s e
c o s t s i n
p e r f o r m i n g
t h e
t wo
r e m o v a l s .
1 2 .
I n
1987, h e
U n i t e d
S t a t e s and Derby
e n t e r e d i n t o a Consent
Decree r e s o l v i n g t h e
U n i t e d
3
Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 1 Filed 10/28/14 Page 3 of 7
8/10/2019 United States vs. City of Derby
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/united-states-vs-city-of-derby 4/7
S t a t e s claims
f o r t h e recovery
o f
e s p o n s e c o s t s r e l a t i n g t o
t h e 19 3~and
1985
r e m o v a l a c t i o n s .
United t a t e s v . C i t y
o f
erby,
C o n n e c t i c u t ,
C i v i l Acti on
Nu m b e r
86-67(D.
a n n . ) .
1 3 .
I n June, 2008, h e l o c a l Council
o f G o v e r n m e n t s
c o n t a c t e d
EPA e q u e s t i n g
a s s i s t a n c e
i n
t h e
r e m o v a l
o i r e i n a i n i n g
s o i l
a t
t h e
S i t e
t h a t
w a s
contaminated
w i t h
p o l y c h l o r i n a t e d
b i p h e n y l s
( I C ~ ~ 3 s ) .
E I ~ 1
determined
t h a t
S i t e
c o n d i t i o n s ,
i n c l u d i n g i n p a r t i c u l a r t h e
PCB
- c o n t a m i n a t e d s o i l ,
pos ed a i e a I t h
t h r e a t based
o n p o t e n t i a l
hum a n
c o n t a c t .
EPA
u b s e q u e n t l y determined
t h a t t h e
response
a c t i o n
should a l s o i n c l u d e s a mpl ing an d
d i s p o s a l
o f egra ded
drums
c o n t a i n i n g
hazardous s u b s t a n c e s t h a t
had
b e c o m e exposed
a n d . u n s t a b l e
i n t h e i n t e r v e n i n g y e a r s s i n c e
EPA's r e m o v a l
a c t i o n s
i n
t h e
1 . 9 8 0 s .
1 4 . E 1 f t e r D e r b y d e c l i n e d
t o
u n d e r t a k e t h e a p p r o p r i a t e
work a t
t h e S i t e ,
EPA roc eeded t o
perform
t h e
r e m o v a l a c t i o n .
1
S .
Since ?008,
h e United S t a t e s
has i n c u r r e d
over
4
i l l i o n ,
p l u s i n t e r e s t ,
i n response
c o s t s
a t
a n d
i n
connection w i t h t h e
S i t e .
1 6 .
On
ebruary
27,
19b3,
D e r b y b e c a m e t h e
o w n e r o f
h e
l a n d t h a t
c o n s t i t u t e s t h e
S i t e .
D e r b y
a c q u i r e d
t i t l e
t o
t h e l a n d
through
e x e c u t i o n
o f
a d e e d
b y
t h e
S t a t e
o f
o n n e c t i c u t .
That
d e e d
w a s r e c o r d e d
w i t h t h e
Town
l e r k
f o r
Derby,
o n n e c t i c u t , o n A p r i l
15,
1 . 9 6 3 . A t
l l
times
s i n c e
1963,
D e r b y
has been
t h e o w n e r o f h e
O S u l l i v a n s
I s l a n d
S i t e .
1 7 .
During
t h e
ti m e
t h a t
D e rb y
o w n e d
a n d o p e r a t e d t h e l a n d
a t
t h e
S i t e ,
hazardous
s u b s t a n c e s ,
i n c l u d i n g
PCBs,
were d i s p o s e d
o f
t
t h e S i t e .
1 8 . Hazardous s u b s t a n c e s a s d e f i n e d i n
S e c t i o n
101(14)
o f
CERCLA, 2 .S.C. § 9601(14),
i n c l u d i n g
PCBs,
have been
d e t e c t e d
a t
t h e
S i t e . The r e l e a s e s a n d
t h r e a t e n e d
r e l e a s e s
o f
hazardous
s u b s t a n c e s
a t o r f r o m t h e S i t e
have
c a u s e d . h e United
S t a t e s
t o i n c u r c o s t s
o f esponse
4
Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 1 Filed 10/28/14 Page 4 of 7
8/10/2019 United States vs. City of Derby
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/united-states-vs-city-of-derby 5/7
n o t i n c o n s i s t e n t
~ r i t h
t h e N a t i o n a l Contingency
P l a n ,
40
C.F.R.
a r t
300,
o f
more
t h a n
$ 4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 .
GENERAL
ALLEGATIONS
1 9 .
The
i t e
i s
a
a c i l i t y
w i t h i n t h e meaning
of
e c t i o n
l0I
9)
f
CERCLA
2
U.S.C.
9 6 0 1 ( 9 ) .
20.
At l l t i m e s r e l e v a n t t o
t h i s
a c t i o n ,
t h e r e
h a s
b een
a r e l e a s e o r
a
' t h r e a t e n e d r e l e a s e
o f
hazardous s u b s t a n c e s , ' '
n c l u d i n g ,
b u t
n o t l i m i t e d t o , PCBs, n t o t h e
environment
a t
o r
from
t h e S i t e , w i t h i n t h e
meaning
o f S e c t i o n s 1 0 1 ( 1 4 ) ,
I01(22)
and 107(a)o fGERCLA 2
U.S.C.
§§
9601(14),
6 0 1 ( 2 2 ) ,
and 9 6 0 7 ( a ) .
21. Derby
s
w i t h i n t h e c l a s s
o f i a b l e p e r s o n s
d e s c r i b e d i n S e c t i o n s 1 0 7 { a ) (1 ) and a ) { 2 )
o f
CERCLA 2
.S.C.
§§
9 6 0 7 ( a ) { 1 ) and
a ) ( 2 ) ,
b e c a u s e
i t
o w n e d
and
o p e r a t e d
t h e
S i t e
a t
t h e
time of i s p o s a l of hazardous
s u b s t a n c e s
a t t h e S i t e
and s
t h e
c u r r e n t
owner of h e S i t e .
CLAIMFOR ELIEF
R~~SPONSE
COSTS
UNDER
CERCLA SECTION
0 7 ( a )
22.
a r a g r a p h s
1 - 2 1 ,
i n c l u s i v e ,
a r e r e a l l e g e d
and i n c o r p o r a t e d h e r e i n by
r e f e r e n c e .
23. n
u n d e r t a k i n g
r e s p o n s e a c t i o n s t o a d d r e s s t h e
r e l e a s e
o r
t h r e a t
o f
e l e a s e
of a z a r d o u s
s u b s t a n c e s a t
t h e
S i t e ,
t h e
U n i t e d S t a t e s
h a s
i n c u r r e d
` ` r e s p o n s e
c o s t s
a s
d e f i n e d i n
S e c t i o n
101(25) of
CERCLA 2
U.S,C.
§
6 0 1 ( 2 5 ) ,
n c l u d i n g
b u t
n o t l i m i t e d t o
{ a )
h e c o s t s of
i n v e s t i g a t i n g t h e
S i t e ,
( b ) h e c o s t s
o f h e removal
a c t i o n , and ( c ) h e c o s t s
o f
a r i o u s
enforcement a c t i v i t i e s .
24.
EPA's
r e s p o n s e
a c t i o n s
t a k e n
a t
o r
i n
c o n n e c t i o n w i t h
t h e S i t e ,
and
t h e c a s t s
i n c u r r e d
i n c i d e n t
t h e r e t o ,
a r e n o t i n c o n s i s t e n t
~ r i t h
t h e N a t i o n a l
Contingency
P l a n , which
wa s
promulgated
p u r s u a n t
t o S e c t i o n
105
of
CERCLA
2 U.S.C. ~
9605,
and
i s
c o d i f i e d
a t
40
5
Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 1 Filed 10/28/14 Page 5 of 7
8/10/2019 United States vs. City of Derby
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/united-states-vs-city-of-derby 6/7
C.F.R. P a r t 300.
25.
P u r s u a n t . o S e c t i o n s
1 0 7 ( a ) ( 1 )
and
{ a ) ( 2 ) ofCERCLA
2 U.S.C.
§
6 0 7 ( a ) ( 1 ) and
( a ) ( 2 ) , Defendant
Derby s j o i n t l y
and
s e v e r a l l y
l i a b l e
t o
t h e U n i t e d
S t a t e s f o r
l l
c o s t s i n c u r r e d
by
t h e
U n i t e d
S t a t e s
i n
c o n n e c t i o n w i t h
t h e
S i t e ,
i n c l u d i n g
enforcement
c o s t s
a n d . i n t e r e s t
on
l l
such
c o s t s .
PRAYER
FOR ELIEF
WHEREFORE
l a i n t i f f ,
t h e
U n i t e d
S t a t e s
of America
r a y s
t h a t t h e
C o u r t :
a .
E n t e r judgment
i n
f a v o r of
h e U n i t e d S t a t e s
and
a g a i n s t Defendant
Derby
f o r
l l
unreimbursed
r e s p o n s e c o s t s
i n c u r r e d
by t h e
U n i t e d
S t a t e s
r e l a t i n g
t o
t h e
S i t e , i n c l u d i n g
enforcement o s t s and prejudgment i n t e r e s t ,
p u r s u a n t
t o
S e c t i o n
1 0 7 ( a ) ( 4 ) ( A ) ofCERCLA
42
.S.C.
§
9 6 0 7 ( a ) ( 4 ) ( A ) ; and
b .
E n t e r
a g a i n s t Defendant
Derby
and
i n f a v o r
of
h e U n i t e d
S t a t e s ,
p u r s u a n t
t o S e c t i o n
1 1 3 ( 8 ) ( 2 ) of
CERCLA
2
U.S.C.
§
9 6 1 3 ( 8 ) ( 2 ) ,
a
d e c l a r a t o r y judgment on i b i l i t y t h a t w i l l
be
b i n d i n g on
any
s ~ i b s e c ~ u e n t
a c t i o n
o r
a c t i o n s t o
r e c o v e r
f u r t h e r
r e s p o n s e
c o s t s ;
and
c .
Award
t h e
U n i t e d
S t a t e s
i t s
c o s t s
of
h i s
a c t i o n ; and
d . G r a n t . such
o t h e r
and
f u r t h e r r e l i e f a s t h e
Court
d e e m s
u s t and
p r o p e r .
R e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d ,
SAMHIRSCH
A c t i n g
A s s i s t a n t
A t t o r n e y
G e n e r a l .
Environment and N a t u r a l
Resources
D i v i s i o n
/ s / P c t e y ~ K. Kauts
P E T E R
K .
KAUTSKY
T r i a l
A t t o r n e y
U. S.
Department of u s t i c e
Environment and
N a t u r a l
Resources
Environmental Enforcement
S e c t i o n
P.O.
Box 761
Washington
D .C.
20044-7611
Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 1 Filed 10/28/14 Page 6 of 7
8/10/2019 United States vs. City of Derby
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/united-states-vs-city-of-derby 7/7
DETRDRE M DALY
U n i t e d
S t a t e s
A t t o r n e y
D i s t r i c t of o n n e c t i c u t
/ s /
L i s u
E. P e r k i n s
LISA
E .
PERKINS
ct23164)
A s s i s t a n t
U n i t e d
S t a t e s
A t t o r n e y
U.S. t t o r n e y s
O f f i c e
H a r t f o r d O f f i c e
450
Main
S t r e e t ,
Room 28
H a r t f o r d ,
C o n n e c t i c u t 06103
T e l . : 860) 47-ll01
Fax:
860)
60-7979
l i s a , p e r k i n s ~ u s d o j . g o v
:~rZ~l~~[.~1J
Cynthia Lewis
O f f i c e
of
egional Counsel
U. S. Environmental
P r o t e c t i o n
Agency
Region
I
Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 1 Filed 10/28/14 Page 7 of 7