University of Groningen

The Dynamics of English Writing Development in Advanced Chinese LearnersHou, Junping

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.

Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date:2017

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):Hou, J. (2017). The Dynamics of English Writing Development in Advanced Chinese Learners [Groningen]:University of Groningen

CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

Download date: 17-08-2018

Reference | 145

References

Adamson, B., & Xia, B. (2011). A case study of the College English Test

and ethnic minority university students in China: negotiating the final

hurdle. Multilingual Education, 1(1), 1-11.

Alexander, R. J. (1984). Fixed expressions in English: reference books and

the teacher. ELT Journal, 38(2), 127-134.

AlHassan, L., & Wood, D. (2015). The effectiveness of focused instruction

of formulaic sequences in augmenting L2 learners' academic writing

skills: A quantitative research study. Journal of English for Academic

Purposes, 17, 51-62.

Anderson, A.H. (1995). Negotiating coherence in dialogue. In: M. A.

Gernsbacher & T. Givon (Eds). The Negotiation of Coherence (pp. 41-

58), New York: John Benjamins.

Anderson, P. L. (1980). Cohesion as an Index for Written and Oral

Composition of ESL Learners.

Appel, R., & Wood, D. (2016). Recurrent word combinations in EAP test-

taker writing: Differences between high-and low-proficiency levels.

Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(1), 55-71.

Baddeley, A. D. (1976). The psychology of memory. New York: Harper &

Row.

Bao, S. (2006). Study on washback effect on the new CET 4. (Unpublished

M.A. thesis). Jilin University.

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and

morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in

Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), 17-34.

Becker, J. D. (1975). The phrasal lexicon. In: Proceedings of the 1975

workshop on Theoretical issues in natural language processing (pp. 60-

63). Association for Computational Linguistics.

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written

communication. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic

writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for

Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2-20.

Reference | 146

Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M.

(2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a

lexical approach to the test. Language teaching research, 10(3), 245-

261.

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University

Press.

Bulté, B. (2013). The development of complexity in second language

acquisition: A dynamic systems approach. (Unpublished doctoral

dissertation). University of Brussels.

Byrnes, H. (2009). Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular

context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and

Education, 20(1), 50-66.

Cai, J. (2005). Some thoughts on college English teaching. Foreign

Language Teaching and Research, 2, 000.

Cancino, H., Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J. (1978). The acquisition of

English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish speakers.

Second language acquisition: A book of readings, 207-230.

Carrell, P. L. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL quarterly, 16(4),

479-488.

Caspi, T. (2010). A dynamic perspective on second language development.

(Unpublished PhD thesis), University of Groningen.

Chan S. (2001) Complex Adaptive Systems, ESD 83. Research Seminar in

Engineering Systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology,

Cambridge, MA.

Chen, J. (2004). College English Curriculum Requirements: A Theoretical

Understanding and Application. Media in Foreign Language

Instruction,6.

Chen, Q., & Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment and curriculum reform in

China: the college English test and tertiary English as a foreign

language education. In: Proceedings of the 2008 AARE International

Education Conference. The Australian Association for Research in

Education.

Cheng, L. (2008). The key to success: English language testing in China.

Language Testing, 25(1), 15-37.

Coh-Metrix (version 3.0). Retrieved from http://cohmetrix.com/

Reference | 147

Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a

second language students’ writing. Research on Language & Social

Interaction, 17(3), 301-316.

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for

languages.

Cowie, A. P. (1992). Multiword lexical units and communicative language

teaching. In: Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 1-12). Palgrave

Macmillan UK.

Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Computational assessment of

lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language

Writing, 18(2), 119-135.

Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2010). Cohesion, coherence, and

expert evaluations of writing proficiency. In: Proceedings of the 32nd

annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 984-989).

Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Text coherence and judgments

of essay quality: Models of quality and coherence. In: Proceedings of

the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1236-

1241).

Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016a). The development

and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to

judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1-

16.

Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016b). The tool for the

automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment

of local, global, and text cohesion. Behavior research methods, 48(4),

1227-1237.

Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Predicting human

scores of essay quality using computational indices of linguistic and

textual features. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence

in Education (pp. 438-440). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

De Beaugrande, R. A., & Dressler, W. U. (1981). Introduction to Text

Linguistics (Vol. 2). London: Longman.

De Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language

learning, 46(3), 529-555.

Reference | 148

De Bot, K. (2008). Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic

process. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 166-178.

Ding, Y., & Qi, Y. (2005). Use of formulaic language as a predictor of L2

oral and written performance. Journal of PLA University of Foreign

Languages, 3, 49-53.

Duan, S. (2008). Review of the research on lexical chunks in second

language teaching in China. Beijing. Journal of Foreign Languages In

China, 4, 23-26.

Dueraman, B. (2007). Cohesion and coherence in English essays written by

Malaysian and Thai medical students. In: Proceedings from Southern

Thailand English Language Teaching/Cultural Change Conference, 1-

18.

Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in

second language acquisition, 24(2), 143-188.

Ellis, N. C. (2008). The periphery and the heart of language. Phraseology:

An interdisciplinary perspective, 1-13.

Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. (2009). Constructing a second language:

Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive

Linguistics, 7(1), 111-139.

Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and

implicit language knowledge. Studies in second language acquisition,

27(2), 305-352.

Ellis, N. C. (2009). Optimizing the input: Frequency and sampling in usage-

based and form-focused learning. The handbook of language teaching,

139.

Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. P. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford

University Press, USA.

Engber, C. A. (1995). The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of

ESL compositions. Journal of second language writing, 4(2), 139-155.

Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice

principle. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse,

20(1), 29-62.

Eyckmans, J., Boers, F., & Stengers, H. (2007). Identifying chunks: Who

can see the wood for the trees. In Language Forum (Vol. 33, No. 2, pp.

85-100).

Reference | 149

Ferris, D. R. (1994). Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by

students at different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2),

414-420.

Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and

idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone.

Language, 64, 501-538.

Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics, 1934-1951. Oxford University

Press.

Fitzgerald, J., & Spiegel, D. L. (1986). Textual cohesion and coherence in

children's writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 263-280.

Fogel, A., & Thelen, E. (1987). Development of early expressive and

communicative action: Reinterpreting the evidence from a dynamic

systems perspective. Developmental psychology, 23(6), 747.

Foltz, P.W., 2007. Discourse coherence and LSA. In: Landauer, T.K.,

McNamara, D.S., Dennis, S., Kintsch, W. (Eds.), Handbook of Latent

Semantic Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, pp. 167–184.

Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on

second language performance. Studies in Second language acquisition,

18(3), 299-323.

Gell-Mann, M. (1995). Let’s call it plectics’. Complexity, 1(5), 96.

Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-Metrix

providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational

researcher, 40(5), 223-234.

Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., & Louwerse, M.M. (2003). What do

readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative

and expository text? In: A.P. Sweet & C.E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking

Reading Comprehension (pp. 82-98). New York: Guilford Publications.

Gu, W., & Liu. J (2005). Test analysis of college students communicative

competence in English. Asian EFL Journal,7, 118–33.

Gu, X. (2005). Positive or negative? An empirical study of CET washback

on college English teaching and learning in China. (Unpublished PhD

Dissertation), Shanghai Jiaotong University.

Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Predicting human

judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second

Reference | 150

language writing samples: A comparison study. Assessing Writing,

18(3), 218-238.

Hakuta, K. (1974). Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in

second language acquisition. Language learning, 24(2), 287-297.

Halliday, M. A. K., Matthiessen, C. M., & Yang, X. (1999). Construing

experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition.

London: Cassell.

Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English, Longman,

London.

Han, B., Dai, M., & Yang, L. (2004). Problems with College English Test as

emerged from a survey. Foreign languages and their teaching, 179(2),

17-23.

Han, M., & Yang, X. (2001). Educational assessment in China: lessons from

history and future prospects. Assessment in Education, 8(1), 5 - 10.

Hartnett, C. G. (1980). Cohesion as a teachable measure of writing

competence. University Microfilms.

Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing

processes. In: L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive Processes

in Writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.

Henry, K. (1996). Early L2 Writing Development: A Study of

Autobiographical Essays by University‐Level Students of Russian. The

Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 309-326.

Hood, G. M. (2004). Poptools. Version 2.6. 4. Albany, Western Australia,

Australia.

Hou, J., Loerts, H., & Verspoor, M. H. (2016). Chunk use and development

in advanced Chinese L2 learners of English. Language Teaching

Research, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816662290

Hou, J., Loerts, H., & Verspoor, M. H. (2018). Exploring attitude and test-

driven motivation towards English at Chinese universities.

International Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), pp37-60.

Hou, J., Loerts, H., & Verspoor, M. H. (under review). The dynamics of L2

writing development over time: A strong learner versus a weak learner.

Submitted (April 10, 2017) to International Journal of Applied

linguistics.

Reference | 151

Hou, J., Verspoor, M., & Loerts, H. (2016). An exploratory study into the

dynamics of ChineseL2 writing development. Dutch Journal of Applied

Linguistics, 5(1), 65-96.

Housen, A., Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in

Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics; 30 (4): 461-473.

Housen , A. , Kuiken , F. , & Vedder , I . (Eds.). ( 2012 ). Dimensions of L2

performance and proficiency. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in

SLA. Amsterdam, The Netherlands : Benjamins .

Howell, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology (4th ed.). Boston,

MA: ITP.

Hsu J.Y. (2007). Multiword lexical units and their relationship to impromptu

speech. Educational Research Information Centre (ERIC).

Indrasuta, C. (1988). Narrative styles in the writing of Thai and American

students. In: Purves, A.(Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures:

Issues in contrastive rhetoric, 206-226.

Ishikawa, S. (1995). Objective measurement of low-proficiency EFL

narrative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(1), 51-69.

Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T., & O’Hagan, S. (2008). What

features of language distinguish levels of learner proficiency, depth

analysis of task performance in the context of the speaking scale

development. Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 29-49.

Jarvis, S., Grant, L., Bikowski, D., & Ferris, D. (2003). Exploring multiple

profiles of highly rated learner compositions. Journal of Second

Language Writing, 12(4), 377-403.

Jespersen, O. (2013). International Language (Vol. 3). Routledge.

Jia, Y., & Yang, R. (2005). The assessment system of college English: the

current situation and its reform. Journal of Shanxi College for Youth

Administrators, 1, 028.

Jin, Y., & Wu, J. (1998). Examining the testing validity of CET reading

comprehension by introspection. Foreign Language World, 2, 47–52.

Jin, Y., & Yang, H. (2006). The English proficiency of college and

university students in China: As reflected in the CET. Language,

Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 21-36.

Johnson, P. (1992). Coherence and cohesion in compositions in Malay and

English. RELC Journal, 23(2), 1-17.

Reference | 152

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-

Hall.

Kern, R. G., & Schultz, J. (1992). The effects of composition instruction on

intermediate level French students’ writing performance: Some

preliminary findings. The Modern Language Journal, 76(1), 1-13.

Klein, D., & Manning, C. D. (2003, July). Accurate unlexicalized parsing.

In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for

Computational Linguistics-Volume 1 (pp. 423-430). Association for

Computational Linguistics.

Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.).

(2013). Handbook of Latent semantic analysis. Psychology Press.

Langacker, R. W. (2000), A dynamic usage-based model. In: M. Barlow &

S. Kenner (Eds.), Usage-based Models of Language (pp.1-63).

Stanford: CSLI Publications

Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar as a basis for language

instruction. In: P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of

Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 66-88).

New York: Routledge.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1978). An ESL index of development. TESOL

Quarterly, 439-448.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/Complexity science and second language

acquisition. Applied Linguistics 18(2), 140–165.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The Emergence of complexity, fluency and

accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of

English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590-619.

Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size & use: lexical richness in

L2 written productions. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307–322.

Lautamatti, L. (1990). Coherence in spoken and written discourse. In: U.

Cornor, and A. M. Johns,(Eds.), Coherence: Research and Pedagogical

Perspectives. Washington, DC: TESOL.

Leech, G., Rayson, P., and Wilson, A. (2001). Word Frequencies in Written

and Spoken English Based on the British National Corpus. London:

Longman.

Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach. Hove, England: Language Teaching

Publications.

Reference | 153

Lewis, M. (1997). Pedagogical implications of the lexical approach. In:

Coady, J. And Huckin, T. (Eds.), Second Language Vocabulary

Acquisition: a Rationale for Pedagogy (pp. 255-270). Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Li, J. (2002). The current college English test in China: Problems and

thoughts. Foreign Language Education, 23(5), 33-38.

Lieber, P. E. (1980). Cohesion in ESL students' expository writing: a

descriptive stud. (Unpublished PhD thesis), New York University.

Lindsay, D.B. (1985). Cohesion in the composition of ESL and English

students. (Unpublished M.A. thesis), University of California.

Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2015). Variability and variation in second

language acquisition orders: A dynamic reevaluation. Language

Learning, 65(1), 63-88.

Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second

language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4),

474-496.

Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures

as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL

Quarterly, 36-62.

Lu, X. (2012). The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL

learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190-

208.

Ma, G. (2009). Lexical bundles in L2 timed writing of English majors.

Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1, 54-59.

MacKay, D. G. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed–

accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89(5),

483.

MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: The database (Vol. 2).

Psychology Press.

McCulley, G.A. (1985). Writing quality, coherence, and cohesion. Research

in the Teaching of English, 19, 269-282.

McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai, Z. (2014).

Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix.

Cambridge University Press.

Reference | 154

McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are

good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background

knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text.

Cognition and instruction, 14(1), 1-43.

Medve, V. B., & Takač, V. P. (2013). The influence of cohesion and

coherence on text quality: A cross-linguistic study of foreign language

learners’ written production. In Language in cognition and affect (pp.

111-131). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some

limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological

review, 63(2), 81.

Minnen, G., Carroll, J., & Pearce, D. (2001). Applied morphological

processing of English. Natural Language Engineering, 7(03), 207-223.

Moon, R. (1997). Vocabulary connections: Multi-word items in English. In:

N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description,

acquisition and pedagogy, 40-63.

Nation, P., & Meara, P. (2002). Vocabulary. An introduction to applied

linguistics, 35-54.

National College English Testing Committee. (2006). CET-4 test syllabus

and sample test paper (revised version). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign

Language Education Press.

Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language

teaching. Oxford University Press.

Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition

and the law of practice. Cognitive skills and their acquisition, 1, 1-55.

O’reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reversing the reverse cohesion

effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers.

Discourse processes, 43(2), 121-152.

Ortega, L. (2000). Understanding syntactic complexity: The measurement of

change in the syntax of instructed L2 Spanish learners (Unpublished

PhD thesis), University of Hawai'i.

Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to

L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college‐level L2 writing.

Applied linguistics, 24(4), 492-518.

Reference | 155

Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory:

nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. Language and

communication, 191, 225.

Penris, W., & Verspoor, M. (2017). Academic writing development: a

complex, dynamic process. In : Pfenninger, S. E. & Navracsics, J.

(Eds.), Future Research Directions for Applied Linguistics. Bristol:

Multilingual Matters.

Perera, N. S. (2001). The role of prefabricated language in young children's

second language acquisition. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(3), 327-

356.

Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency

effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language

acquisition. Cognition, 38(1), 43-102.

Polio, C. (2003). Research on second language writing: an overview of what

we investigate and how. Exploring the dynamics of second language

writing, 1, 35-66.

Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.

Römer, U. (2009). The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus

linguistic perspectives. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1),

140-162.

Rosenbloom, P., & Newell, A. (1987). Learning by chunking: A production

system model of practice. In: Klahr, D., & Langley, P. (Eds.),

Production system models of learning and development, 221-286.

Scarcella, R. C. (1984). Cohesion in the writing development of native and

non-native English speakers. (Unpublished PhD thesis), University of

Southern California.

Schmid, M. S., Verspoor, M., & MacWhinney, B. (2011). Coding and

extracting data. A dynamic approach to second language development:

Methods and techniques, 39-54.

Schmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2004). Formulaic sequences in action. Formulaic

sequences: Acquisition, processing and use, 1-22.

Schmid, H. J. (2015). A blueprint of the entrenchment-and-

conventionalization model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive

Linguistics Association, 3(1), 3.

Reference | 156

Serrano, R., Stengers, H., & Housen, A. (2015). Acquisition of formulaic

sequences in intensive and regular EFL programmes. Language

Teaching Research, 19(1), 89-106.

Shu, D. (2006) FLT in China: problems and suggested solutions. Applied

Linguistics, 27(4), 754-757.

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University

Press.

Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating

complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied linguistics, 3(4), 510-

532.

Smiskova-Gustafsson, H. (2013). Chunks in L2 development: a usage-based

perspective. (Unpublished PhD thesis), University of Groningen.

Smiskova-Gustafsson, H., Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2012).

Conventionalized ways of saying things (CWOSTs) and L2

development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 125-142.

Somasundaran, S., Burstein, J., & Chodorow, M. (2014). Lexical chaining

for measuring discourse coherence quality in test-taker essays. In

COLING (pp. 950-961).

Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of

accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition

of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 532-553.

Stockwell, G., & Harrington, M. (2003). The incidental development of L2

proficiency in NS-NNS email interactions. CALICO Journal, 337-359.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: the sociolinguistic analysis of

natural language (Vol. 4). University of Chicago Press.

Sun, H. (2015). Predictors and Stages of Very Young Child EFL Learners’

English Development in China. (Unpublished PhD thesis), University

of Groningen.

Systat Software Incorporated. (2015). Table curve 2D (v5.01 ed.).

Rochmond. California, USA: Systat Software Incorporated.

Tanskanen, S. K. (2006). Collaborating towards coherence: lexical cohesion

in English discourse (Vol. 146). John Benjamins Publishing.

Templin, M. C. (1957). Certain language skills in children; their

development and interrelationships. University of Minnesota Press

Thelen, E. (1989). Self-organization in developmental processes: Can

systems approaches work? In: M. Gunnar & E. Thelen (Eds.), Systems

Reference | 157

and development. The Minnesota Symposia in Child Psychology (pp.

77-117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1996). A dynamic systems approach to the

development of cognition and action. MIT press.

Tierney, R.J, & Mosenthal, J. (1983). Cohesion and textual coherence.

Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 215-229.

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of

language acquisition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C. D., & Singer, Y. (2003). Feature-rich

part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In:

Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of

the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language

Technology-Volume 1(pp. 173-180). Association for Computational

Linguistics.

Urquhart, V., McIver, M., 2005. Teaching writing in the content areas. In:

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Aurora, CO.

Van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2011). Variability and DST. A

dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and

techniques, 55-84.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and Context-Explorations in the. Semantics and

Pragmatics of. Discourse, (pp. 93–129). London: Longman.

Van Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language

growth. Psychological Review, 98(1), 3.

Van Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development: Change between

complexity and chaos. Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Van Geert, P., & Van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to

study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant

Behavior and Development, 25(4), 340-374.

Van Geert, P., & Verspoor, M. (2015). Dynamic systems and language

development. In The Handbook of Language Emergence, 537-555

Verspoor, M. (in press) Complex dynamic systems theory and L2 pedagogy:

lessons to be learned. In: Ortega, L. & Han, Z. (Eds.), Complexity

Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-

Freeman. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Reference | 158

Verspoor, M., & Behrens, H. (2011). Dynamic systems theory and a usage

based approach to second language development. In: M. Verspoor, K.

de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A Dynamic Approach to Second Language

Development: Methods and Techniques. (pp. 25-38). Amsterdam: John

Benjamins.

Verspoor, M., & van Dijk, M. (2011). Visualizing interactions between

variables. A dynamic approach to second language development:

Methods and techniques, 85-98.

Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.) (2011). A Dynamic systems

approach to second language development: methods and techniques.

Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Verspoor, M., & Hong, N. (2013). A dynamic usage-based approach to

Communicative Language Teaching. European Journal of Applied

Linguistics, 1(1), 22-54.

Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second

language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The

Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214-231.

Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., Chan, H. P., & Vahtrick, L. (2017). Linguistic

complexity in second language development: variability and variation

at advanced stages. Recherches en didactique des langues et des

cultures. Les cahiers de l'Acedle, 14 (1).

Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M. (2008) Variability in L2

development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language

Journal, 92, 214-31.

Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X. (2012). A dynamic usage-based

perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3),

239-263.

Wachal, R.S., & Spreen, O. (1973). Some measures of lexical diversity in

aphasic and normal language performance. Language and Speech, 16,

169-181.

Wang, J. (2007). The college English test in China: challenges and

suggestions. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 17, 137-

144.

Warren, B. (2005). A model of idiomaticity. Nordic Journal of English

Studies, 4(1), 35-54.

Reference | 159

Watson Todd, R. (2003). Topics in classroom discourse. (Unpublished PhD

thesis), University of Liverpool.

Watson Todd, R.W. (1998). Topic-based analysis of classroom discourse.

System, 26(3), 303-318.

Watson Todd, R., Khongput, S., & Darasawang, P. (2007). Coherence,

cohesion and comments on students’ academic essays. Assessing

Writing, 12(1), 10-25.

Watson Todd, R., Thienpermpool, P., & Keyuravong, S. (2004). Measuring

the coherence of writing using topic-based analysis. Assessing Writing,

9(2), 85-104.

Weigand, E. (2009). Language as dialogue: from rules to principles of

probability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge Language Assessment

Series. Cambridge: CUP.

Weir, C. J. (1990). Communicative Language Testing. New York: Prentice

Hall

Wen, Q., Wang, L., & Liang, M. (2005). Spoken and written English corpus

of Chinese learners. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research

Press.

Widdowson, H. (1989). Knowledge of language and ability for use. Applied

Linguistics, 10(2), 128-137

Witte, S., & Faigley, L. (1981). Coherence, cohesion, and writing quality.

College Composition and Communication, 37(1), 22-29.

Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. (1998). Second language

development in writing: measures of fluency, accuracy, & complexity,

Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency:

background, evidence and classroom applications. Bloomsbury

Publishing.

Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Wu, J., & Wang R. (2002). Lexical chunks, English teaching resources to be

exploited. Jinan: Shandong. Foreign Language Teaching. 23(3), 26.

Reference | 160

Xu, X. (2010). English language attrition and retention in Chinese and

Dutch university students. (Unpublished PhD thesis), University of

Groningen.

Yang, H. (2003). The 15 years of CET and its impact on teaching. Journal of

Foreign Languages, 3, 21-29.

Yang, H., & Jin, Y. (2001). Score interpretation of CET. Foreign Language

World, 81, 62–68.

Yang, H., & Weir, C. (2001). Validation study of the national English test.

Shanghai, China: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative

writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels.

Linguistics and Education, 23(1), 31-48.

Yao, B. (2002). Prefabricated lexical chunks and English teaching.

Shanghai: English Teaching and Research Notes. 23(3), 26.

Yin, Z. (2013). Development, issues and tendencies of recent researches of

language chunks in China-a survey of the CSSCI journal articles.

Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology, 33(6), 102-

108

Yule, G. (1996). The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Zareva, A., Schwanenflugel, P., & Nikolova, Y. (2005). Relationship

between lexical competence and language proficiency-variable

sensitivity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(4), 567-595.

Zhang, Z. (2005). A historical review of CET 4/6. Modern Language

Journal, 18(2), 100-103

Zhao, J., & Cheng, L. (2010). Exploring the relationship between Chinese

university students’ Attitudes towards the college English test and their

test performance. English Language Assessment and the Chinese

Learner, 190.

Zhao, Y. (2009). An empirical study of L2 learners’ use of lexical chunks

and language production. (Unpublished M.A. thesis), Kristianstad

University College.

Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. (2008). Test review: college English test (CET) in

China. Language Testing, 25(3), 408-417.

Zhu, H. (2003). Globalization and new ELT challenges in China. English

Today, 19(04), 36-41.

Reference | 161

Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language

comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.

Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of

situation-model construction innarrative comprehension. Journal of

Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386–

397.