university of northampton teachers and advisors conference full version feb 2017
TRANSCRIPT
Why learning and teaching at the University of Northampton is different
Dr Rachel Maxwell Head of Learning &Teaching Development
Tuesday 28th February 2017
@DrRachLTB
Strategic Challenges
@DrRachLTB
A course follows an ABL methodology if it:• Is taught through student-centred activities to
develop knowledge and understanding, independent learning & digital fluency.
• Has a core, collaborative face-to-face component, explicitly linked to learning activity outside the classroom, typically online.
• Helps to develop autonomy, Changemaker attributes and employability skills.
@DrRachLTB
Active Blended Learning: The New Normal
Preparatory work
Preparatory sense-making
activities
F2F sessionConsolidation & follow-
up
Online & F2F
Face-to-Face
Online & F2F
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOwbqaoJUoc
@DrRachLTB
A course is not taught in ABL if:• It makes regular use of non-interactive lectures, or
• NILE is primarily a content repository, or
• Online activity is merely an add-on to the face-to-face sessions, or
• There is no evidence of systematic enhancement.
@DrRachLTB
Benefits of ABL:
Staff• Do more of what you love• Ownership• Lightbulb moments• Sharing resources• Move content transmission
online• Time to trial
Students• Personalised & tailored• Flexible – where, when and how• Revision and consolidation of
learning• Application of content to practice• Better prepared• Increased ownership of learning
@DrRachLTB
Challenges of ABL:
Staff• Time!• Increasingly student-led• Heavy workload upfront• Learning how to design and
deliver online• Non-engagement /
preparation
Students• Independent learning and
autonomy• Time management• Distractions• O/L not timetabled
@DrRachLTB
What is ‘quality contact’?
• Tutor-mediated• Teaching, guidance and feedback to students• F2F and online• Onsite and off-site• Synchronous and asynchronous• Personalised tutor presence and input within a specified time-
frame• Structured• Focused• Purposeful• Interactive
} = high quality
@DrRachLTB
Non-literacy
Digital literacy
Digital competence
Digital fluency
Images by Juan P. Armellini, used by permission
@DrRachLTB
Evidence from students (1)
“Students consistently commented that they felt that they wanted more interactive classes. This was not just so that they could practically learn about their subject area, but also to develop peer relationships with their classmates, which they also linked to good future employability skills”.
Source: NUS Student Experience Research 2012 p.5, emphasis added
@DrRachLTB
Evidence from students (2)
“When asked what would most improve their academic experience, 50.2% of students said that more interactive/group teaching sessions would improve their experience”.
Source: NUS Student Experience Research 2012 p.5, emphasis added
“I prefer the seminar because I have more chance to talk to lecturers or tutors. In some lectures the tutors just talk and it’s not very efficient”.
Source: NUS Student Experience Research 2012 p.19, emphasis added
@DrRachLTB
Evidence from students (4)
“[…] the traditional model that continues to dominate in UK higher education: teaching through lectures, excessive summative assessment, slow feedback, and students working almost entirely individually. Many student complaints about the quality of their courses can be tracked back to [these]”.
Source: Comprehensive Guide to Learning & Teaching (NUS, 2015: 7), emphasis added
@DrRachLTB
Evidence from the literature
Explaining ABL to students