university of texas at austinmichigan technological university 1 module 1: environmental literacy:...
TRANSCRIPT
University of Texas at Austin1
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Environmental Literacy:Environmental Issues, Risk, Exposure, and
Regulations
David Shonnard
Department of Chemical Engineering
Michigan Technological University
University of Texas at Austin2
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Presentation Outline
Educational goals and topics covered in the module
Potential uses of the module in chemical engineering courses
Review of environmental impacts - Chapter 1
Environmental and health risk assessment - Ch. 2
Exposure calculations - Chapter 6
Environmental regulations of interest to chemical engineers - Chapter 3
University of Texas at Austin3
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Educational goals and topics
Students will: be introduced to major environmental issues related
to chemical processing
become familiar with the fundamentals of risk assessment
be introduced to the major environmental regulations of interest to the chemical industry and the chemical engineer
become aware of the major pathways and routes of exposure to industrial chemicals
University of Texas at Austin4
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Potential uses of the module in chemical engineering courses
Design course: Introduce environmental literacy and regulations before assigning projects
Freshman Engineering: Introduction to issues regarding environment / society / industry
University of Texas at Austin5
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Scope of environmental impacts (Ch 1)
Raw MaterialsExtraction
Energy
Wastes
ChemicalProcessing
Wastes
ProductManufacturing
Wastes
Use, Reuse,Disposal
Wastes
Materials
Energy
Materials
Energy
Materials
Energy
Materials
Pollution Control
Pollution Control
Life-CycleStages
global warming
ozone depletion
smog formation
acidifi-cation
ecological harm
Human healthand ecosystem damage
Midpoints
Endpoint
University of Texas at Austin6
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: U.S. Energy Flows, 1997
Annual Energy Review 1997, U.S. DOE, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, DOE/EIA-0384(97)
University of Texas at Austin7
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Global warming and related impacts
ChemicalProcessing
EnergyMaterialsProducts
greenhousegas emissions CO2, CH4, N2O
climate change;sea level change
human mortalityor life adjustments
Cause and Effect Chain
CFCs
CO2
CH4
O3
N2O
Contribution to global Warming; Phipps, NPPC, http://www.snre.umich.edu/nppc/
Climate Change 1995, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, WMO and
UNEP, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
University of Texas at Austin8
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Stratospheric ozone and related impacts
ChemicalProcessing
EnergyMaterialsProducts
ozone depleting substancesCFCs, HCFCs
ozone layer lossincrease in uv
human mortalityor life adjustmentsecosystem damage
Cause and Effect Chain
0.E+00
2.E+05
4.E+05
6.E+05
8.E+05
1.E+06
1.E+06
1995 1996 1997
Year
Total On- and Off-site Releases
Toxics Release Inventory Data
University of Texas at Austin9
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Smog formation and related impacts
ChemicalProcessing
EnergyMaterialsProducts
NOx and volatileorganic substances
photochemical oxidation reactions
human/ecologicaldamage from O3
and other oxidants
Cause and Effect Chain
NOx VOCs
12 3
4
5
6
7
1
2
34
5
6 7
1 - Chemical & Allied Processing2 - Petroleum & Related Industries
3 - Metals Processing, 4 - Other Industrial Processes5 - Solvent Utilization, 6 - Storage & Transportation7 - Waste Disposal & Recycling
VOCs
NOx 1997
1997
National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report, 1997, U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, http://www.epa.gov/oar/aqtrnd97/chapter2.pdf
Fuel Combustion
Industrial Processes
Transportation
Miscellaneous
University of Texas at Austin10
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Acid rain / Acid deposition
ChemicalProcessing
EnergyMaterialsProducts
SO2 and NOxemission to air
Acidification rxns.& acid deposition
human/ecologicaldamage from H+
and heavy metals
Cause and Effect Chain
National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report, 1997, U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, http://www.epa.gov/oar/aqtrnd97/chapter2.pdf
SO2
1
23
5 7
4
6
1 - Chemical & Allied Processing2 - Petroleum & Related Industries3 - Metals Processing4 - Other Industrial Processes5 - Solvent Utilization6 - Storage & Transportation7 - Waste Disposal & Recycling
1997
Fuel Combustion
Industrial Processes
Transportation
Miscellaneous
University of Texas at Austin11
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Human health toxicity
ChemicalProcessing
EnergyMaterialsProducts
Toxic releases to air, water, and soil
Transport, fate, exposure pathways& routes
Human health damage; carcino-genic & non...
Petroleum Refining
9%
Chemical / Allied
Products51%
Transport-ation
Equipment7%
All Other Industries
16%
Primary Metals
8%
Electronic Equipment
9%
Chemical and Allied Products
27%
Primary Metals22%
All Other Industries
23%
Paper and Allied
Products5%
Petroleum Refining
3%
Rubber and Miscel-
laneous Plastics
3%
Transport-ation5%
Fabricated Metals
6%
Electronic Equipment
6%
RCRA HazardousWaste
EPCRAToxicWaste
Allen and Rosselot, 1997
University of Texas at Austin12
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Risk assessment: important questions (Ch
2)
What are the risks associated with a chemical, manufacturing process, or use of a product?
How is risk quantified by professional risk assessors?
Is risk assessment used by government agencies to regulate industry? (Yes!)
University of Texas at Austin13
Michigan Technological University
Steps in risk assessment» Hazard assessment» Exposure assessment» Dose/response relationships» Risk characterization
Module 1: Risk assessment: introductory concepts
Risk = F(exposure x hazard)
Modules 1,2 Modules 1,2 Chapters 5,6 Chapters 2,5
University of Texas at Austin14
Michigan Technological University
Indicators of chemical toxicology Carcinogenic effects - Slope Factor (SF), Weight of Evidence (WOE)
classification
Noncarcinogenic effects - No Observable Adverse Effects Level (NOAEL), Reference Dose (RfD), Reference Concentration (RfC), Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL), Threshold Limit Value (TLV)
Sources of Data for Health Effects1. The Material Safety Data Sheet - MSDS
2. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards (www.cdc.gov/niosh.npg/gpdstart.html) 3. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (http://www.epa.gov/ngispgm3/iris/index.html)
4. National Library of Medicine (ToxNet) (http://sis.nlm.nih.gov/sis1)
5. Casarett and Doull’s “Toxicology, the Basic Science of Poisons”, Macmillan
6. Patty’s Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, John Wiley & Sons
Module 1: Hazard assessment
University of Texas at Austin15
Michigan Technological University
Occupational Exposure- exposure to people in the workplace Community Exposure- exposure outside the workplace
Different modeling approaches and assumptions
Exposure Assessment Methodology - Community Exposure1. Identify all waste stream components and concentrations
2. Estimate release rates to the air, water, and soil
3. Choose proper exposure pathways (through environment) and routes (into humans)
4. Determine exposure concentrations at the point of exposure to humans using measurements or an environmental fate and transport model
Module 1: Exposure assessment (Ch 6)
University of Texas at Austin16
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Exposure assessment - cont.
Multiple pathwaysare possibleExposure Routes
1. Inhalation2. Ingestion3. Dermal (skin)
University of Texas at Austin17
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Exposure assessment - H2S release
example
Ca Q
y zvxexp
H2
2z2
Q = 0.025 kg/s H2S
H = 0 m
x = 300 m
Rural release, daytime neutral atmosphere, x<500m, vx=4 m/s yz = 0.01082 x1.78
Rural release, nighttime stable atmosphere, x<500m , vx=2.5 m/s yz = 0.0049 x1.66
Ca 0.025kg / s
(.01082 (300 m)1.78 (4 m / s))7.17 10 6 kg / m3 1.71mg / m3
Ca 0.025kg / s
(.0049 (300 m)1.66 (2.5 m / s))5.02 10 5 kg / m3 50.2 mg / m3
Atmospheric dispersion Model, Ca
University of Texas at Austin18
Michigan Technological University
How large a dose causes what kind of effect?
Module 1: Dose/Response
Effective Dose(reversible) Toxic Dose
(irreversible)Lethal Dose
Crowl and Louvar, Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications, Prentice Hall, 1990
University of Texas at Austin19
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Risk Characterization
Risk i = (Ca CREFED)
(BW AT )SF
i
Exposure Dose(mg/kg/d)
Dose - Response Relationship,Slope Factor (mg/kg/d)-1
Result: # excess cancers per 106 cases in the population; 10-4 to 10-6 acceptable
Carcinogenic Risk Example (inhalation route)
Exposure FactorsCR = contact rate (m3 air breathed / day)EF = exposure frequency (days / yr)ED = exposure duration (yr)BW = body weight (kg)AT = averaging time (days) - 25,550 days for carcinogenic risk
University of Texas at Austin20
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Environmental regulations:the regulatory process (Ch 3)
Environmental Laws • Clean Air Act of 1970
Administrative Agencies • US Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Regulations • National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Rule Making • publish proposed regulations in the Federal Register
• receive public comment on proposed regulations
• publish regulations in the Federal Register
University of Texas at Austin21
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Environmental regulations:changes over time
Bishop, “Pollution Prevention: Fundamentals and Practice”, McGraw-Hill, 2000
Major Laws/Amendments Environmental Regulations
University of Texas at Austin22
Michigan Technological University
The 9 essential environmental regulations:
the manufacture of chemicals
EnvironmentalStatute
DateEnacted
Purpose ofLegislation
Key Provisions
Regulation of ChemicalManufacturing
The Toxic SubstancesControl Act (TSCA)
The Federal Insecti-cide, Fungicide, andRodenticide Act(FIFRA)
The OccupationalSafety and Health Act(OSH Act)
1976
Enacted,1947Amended,1972
1970
Assess the risks ofchemicals before theyare introduced intocommerce.
Assess the risks of pes-ticides and to controltheir usage to minimizeexposure.
Control exposure tochemicals in the work-place
Chemical manufacturers, importers, orprocessors, must test new chemicalsand submit a Premanufacturing Notice(PMN) to EPA.
Before any pesticide can be distrib-uted or sold in the U.S., it must beregistered with the EPA.
Companies must adhere to all OSHAhealth standards (exposure limits tochemicals) and safety standards(physical hazards from equipment).Requires companies to develop (ma-terial safety data sheet (MSDS).
University of Texas at Austin23
Michigan Technological University
EnvironmentalStatute
DateEnacted
Purpose ofLegislation
Key Provisions
Regulation of Dischargesto the Air, Water, and Soil
Clean Air Act (CAA)
Clean Water Act (CWA)
Resource Conservationand Recovery Act(RCRA)
1970
1972
1976
Establish uniform ambient airquality standards / control airpollution discharge. Address spe-cific air pollution problems (haz-ardous air pollutants, stratosphericozone depletion, and acid rain).
Reduce pollutant discharges intothe nation’s waterways (“zero dis-charge” goal). Make water bodiessafe for swimming, fishing, andother forms of recreation (“swim-mable” goal).
Regulate the “cradle-to-grave”generation, transport, and dis-posal of both non-hazardous andhazardous wastes to land, en-courage recycling, and promotethe development of alternative en-ergy sources based on solid wastematerials.
National Ambient Air Quality Stan-dards (NAAQS) for CO, Pb, NO2,O3, particulate matter, and SO2.States must develop source-specific emission limits to achievethe NAAQS.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimi-nation System (NPDES) permitprogram. Permit holders mustmonitor discharges, collect data,and keep records of the pollutantlevels of their effluents.
Generators must maintain recordsof hazardous waste generation andtransportation, and file this data inbiennial reports to the EPA.Transporters and disposal facilitiesmust adhere to similar require-ments for record keeping andmonitoring the environment.
The 9 essential environmental regulations :
discharges to air, water, and soil
University of Texas at Austin24
Michigan Technological University
The 9 essential environmental regulations :
clean-up, disclosure, and pollution prevention
EnvironmentalStatute
DateEnacted
Purpose ofLegislation
Key Provisions
Clean-Up, EmergencyPanning, and PollutionPrevention
The ComprehensiveEnvironmental Re-sponse, Compensation,and Liability Act(CERCLA)
The Emergency Plan-ning and CommunityRight to Know Act(EPCRA – part of SARA)
Pollution PreventionAct (PPA)
1980
1986
1990
Identify and clean up hazardouswaste sites at industrial com-plexes, and federal facilities. EPAis responsible for creating the Na-tional Priority List (NPL). Amendedby the Superfund Amendmentsand Reauthorization Act (SARA)of 1986.
1) to respond to chemical releaseemergencies, and 2) compile aninventory of toxic chemical re-leases to the air, water, and soilfrom manufacturing facilities.
Establish pollution prevention asthe nation’s primary pollutionmanagement strategy with em-phasis on source reduction. Es-tablished a Pollution PreventionInformation Clearinghouse.
EPA identifies potentially responsi-ble parties (PRPs) and notifiesthem of their potential CERCLAliability, which is strict, joint andseveral, and retroactive.
Facilities must help state and localentities to develop emergency re-sponse plans, and report annuallyto EPA data on toxic substances .
Owners and operators of facilitiesthat are required to file a Form Runder the SARA Title III to report tothe EPA information regarding thesource reduction and recycling ef-forts that the facility has undertakenduring the previous year.
University of Texas at Austin25
Michigan Technological University
Module 1: Recap
Educational goals and topics covered in the module
Potential uses of the module in chemical engineering courses
Review of environmental impacts - Chapter 1
Environmental and health risk assessment - Ch. 2
Exposure calculations - Chapter 6
Environmental regulations of interest to chemical engineers - Chapter 3