university strategy marcus williams. contents 0.1 strategic goals 0.2 re-positioning 0.3 campus...
TRANSCRIPT
Contents
0.1 Strategic goals
0.2 Re-positioning
0.3 Campus infrastructure
0.4 Sussex off campus
0.5 Malaysia Office
0.6 Questions
Strategic Goals
Making the Future to 2018 – Strategic Goals
• Teaching, Learning and Student Experience– Securing a top 10 position for overall satisfaction in the National Student Survey
(NSS) and being in the top 25 for all NSS themes.– Growing undergraduate student numbers by 50 per cent in targeted academic
areas.– Growing our postgraduate student numbers to ensure that the proportion of
postgraduate students is at least 20 per cent.– Ensuring all undergraduate students have the opportunity to broaden their studies
by engaging with some combination of study abroad, placement, a minor pathway and volunteering.
– Being consistently in the top 20 of UK universities in both UK and world rankings.
Sussex actual and adjusted growth to reflect Peer Group and Sector growth 2000-11
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
8000850090009500
10000105001100011500120001250013000
Sussex
with Peer growth
with Sector growthSussex 7% vs 18% R/94
Sussex 41% vs 38% R/94
Size of Institution: Peer Group 2011/12 Student FTEs
Inst of E
ducation
Goldsmith
s
Royal H
olloway
Birkbeck
ReadingBath
Surre
y
Loughboro
ughYork
Durham
Bristol
Exeter
Cambridge
Newcastl
eKing's
UCL
Cardiff
Edinburgh
Leeds
Manch
ester
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
400001994 Group/Others
Sussex, 30th/39
Russell GroupRussell Group joiners
Sussex Student FTEs: Actual and target
2002
/03
2003
/04
2004
/05
2005
/06
2006
/07
2007
/08
2008
/09
2009
/10
2010
/11
2011
/12
2012
/13
2013
/14
2014
/15
2015
/16
2016
/17
2017
/18
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
shortfall
Overseas Postgraduate
Home & EU Postgraduate
Overseas Undergraduate
Home & EU Undergraduate
10%
62%
15%
13%
10%
12%
14%
64%
Applications are clearly linked to national league tables position
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40 -20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
13 15
-11
-16
average LT rank
% applications difference
Av
era
ge
Le
ag
ue
Ta
ble
ra
nk
% c
ha
ng
e i
n a
pp
lic
ati
on
s c
om
pa
red
to
s
ec
tor
Year (of League Table publication and application entry)
NSS questions 2014
•The teaching on my course (Q1-4)• Q1. Staff are good at explaining things •Q2. Staff have made the subject interesting •Q3. Staff are enthusiastic about what they are teaching •Q4. The course is intellectually stimulating
•Assessment and feedback (Q5-9) •Q5. The criteria used in marking have been clear in advance •Q6. Assessment arrangements and marking have been fair •Q7. Feedback on my work has been prompt •Q8. I have received detailed comments on my work •Q9. Feedback on my work has helped me clarify things I did not understand
•Overall Satisfaction Academic support (Q10-12) •Q10. I have received sufficient advice and support with my studies •Q11. I have been able to contact staff when I needed to•Q12. Good advice was available when I needed to make study choices
Organisation and management (Q13-15) Q13. The timetable works efficiently as far as my activities are concerned Q14. Any changes in the course or teaching have been communicated effectivelyQ15. The course is well organised and is running smoothly
Learning resources (Q16-18) Q16. The library resources and services are good enough for my needs Q17. I have been able to access general IT resources when I needed to Q18. I have been able to access specialised equipment, facilities or rooms when I needed to
Personal development (Q19-21) Q19. The course has helped me to present myself with confidence Q20. My communication skills have improved Q21. As a result of the course, I feel confident in tackling unfamiliar problems
Overall satisfaction Q22
Percentage satisfied by theme 2008-2014
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201450%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%% satisfied with teaching
% satisfied with assessment and feedback
% satisfied with academic support
% satisfied with organisation and management
% satisfied with learning resources
% satisfied with personal development
% sa
tisfa
ction
How NSS results are used in league tables
League table Teaching
Assess. & feedback
Academic support
Org. & m’gmt
Learning resources
Personal dev.
Overall (Q22)
Latest overall rank (year of pub.)
Complete University Guide
38th (2014)
Guardian43rd
(2014)
Times & Sunday Times
32nd (2013)
Average score (1-5)
Average score (1-5)
Average % agree or strongly agree
How league tables weight indicators
Guardian Times/ST CUG0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Completion
Good degrees
Entry tariff
Value added
Grad. prospects
SSR
Spend / student
RAE
NSS
We
igh
t
Employability: 2009-2013 graduates (DLHE)
2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100% 96%
4%
75%
employed & further studyunemployedjobs at graduate level
Campus Infrastructure
• Attenborough Centre for Creative Arts opens in September
• East Slope will be replaced