unleashing the potential of collaboration – archaeological detection in the 21st century
DESCRIPTION
Computers, the internet and mobile phones have changed how archaeologists work. More importantly it has changed how everybody can access, use and contribute to archaeology. This has altered public expectations on modes of engagement and resource access. This is resulting in an increased demand for access to this data. This phenomena is not solely about archaeology and heritage but is reflected in many areas of society. Some governments have recognised that taxpayers, as funders of data, should be allowed to access and utilise this data more easily. This has underpinned the Open Data movement. At the same time companies and institutions, like Google and NASA, started making large datasets available on the internet. Some of these organisations provided Application Programming Interface (API's) and other services so that software applications could be built around their data. Such software services made it easier for people to use this data to make new things (derive content) and in turn share these things with their communities. This produced the crowd-sourcing and citizen-science movements. Crowdsoucing is where products, ideas, or content are created by soliciting contributions from a large group of people online. The community mapping system called Open Street Map is a good example of crowdsourcing. Other people want to be more active. Projects like Galaxy Zoo, Ancient Lives and Old Weather have helped free data trapped in books or help scientists collect and analyse data. National Geographic have sponsored a project to help detect archaeological sites in Mongolia using high spatial resolution satellite images (exploration.nationalgeographic.com/mongolia/home). With lots of people working together a big problem can turn into a small problem. These people are 'citizen scientists'. This presentation will describe these movements in more detail and provide examples of their implications for the heritage sector. A vision will then be set out for the future of a collaborative framework for heritage management. This will be framed in the implications it has for practice, engagement, research, curation and policy. Public participation is welcomed!TRANSCRIPT
Housekeeping
• Presentation is available on slideshare:
–http://goo.gl/Ew2Iz● My notes from the conference:
–http://goo.gl/dzOuz● Don't worry it's on the final slide
Archaeology is led by
Theories structure this evidence
The past is a foreign place
• Archaeological knowledge acquisition is a dynamic process
• Dynamic feedback allows theories/practice to be tested or revised
Interpretation
Synthesis
• Primary data– Excavation
records– Remote
sensing transcriptions
– NMP– Lab Analysis– Specialist
reports
• Decoupled synthetic data– Site reports– SMR– NMR
Isn’t this wrong?
Implications of silo-ed data
• No synergy• Cripples the
knowledge frameworks
• Less effective– Research– Impact– Policy– Engagement
Interpretation
Synthesis
Open data
Make better decision based on the best available evidence.Make better decision based on the best available evidence.>K2 <U2
Known knowns
Known unknowns
Unknownunknowns
Open contributions
Open contributions
Think of an Open Archaeology Map!
http://www.hypr3d.com/models/4eb80c1657ec530001000058
http://photosynth.net/view.aspx?cid=f817f6c4-3bac-4373-9329-dfa5ecfa7e70
Open processing - SaaS
http://www.earthlook.org/demos/demo_items/sandbox.php
What is the impact on detection
Where do we want to be?
Think provision not possessionLeif Isaksen
The next decade belongs to distributed models not centralised ones, to collaboration not control, and to small data not big data.
Rufus Pollock
We must find new ways of doing our work in a public sphere without impacting on disciplinary integrity
Conor Newman
Think provision not possessionLeif Isaksen
The next decade belongs to distributed models not centralised ones, to collaboration not control, and to small data not big data.
Rufus Pollock
We must find new ways of doing our work in a public sphere without impacting on disciplinary integrity
Conor NewmanPresentation is available on slideshare:
http://goo.gl/Ew2IzMy notes:
http://goo.gl/dzOuzMuch of the material is freely available under CC-BY licences on Wikimedia Commons: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Arbeck
