update and key learnings from the irish physical activity ... · joseph j murphy1, jemima...
TRANSCRIPT
• intervention coordinators, funders and policy makers when deciding on the future of PA interventions.
INTRODUCTION
To answer the question: “How do we successfully implement effectiveinterventions designed to reduce physical inactivity in Ireland?”
OBJECTIVES
METHODS
RESULTS
• I-PARC highlights the need for effective partnerships and buy in from various sectors inorder to promote PA
• The project is securing significant support for the development of a pragmaticevaluation framework that can be suitable for real world application and useful forvarious stakeholders
• Gathering information from those involved in the delivery of PA interventions willprovide valuable insight into the facilitators and barriers of implementation
• The collaboration leads to the transfer of knowledge for all parties, reducing the gapbetween research, practice and policy
DISCUSSION
1Physical Activity for Health Cluster, Health Research Institute, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Ireland; 2Department of Health, Dublin, Ireland; 3Sport Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; 4Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland; 5School of Health Sciences, Waterford Institute of Technology,
Ireland; 6School of Sport, Ulster University, Jordanstown Campus, Northern Ireland; 7Department of Education, Dublin, Ireland; 8Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport, Dublin, Ireland; 9Health and Social Care, Public Health Agency, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Figure 1. Adapted from the NIRN Framework
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would also like to thank the members of the I-PARC team,research collaboration, the practitioner advisory group andfunders.
REFERENCES 1. World Health Organization, A European Framework to Promote Physical
Activity for Health. Copenhagen, Denmark; 2007. 2. Woods CB, Powell C, Saunders JA, O’Brien W, Murphy MH, Duff C, Farmer O,
Johnston A., Connolly S. and Belton S. (2018). The Children’s Sport Participation and Physical Activity Study 2018 (CSPPA 2018). https://www.sportireland.ie/Research/CSPPA%20Final%20Report.pdf
3. Dublin, Ireland and Sport Northern Ireland, Belfast, Northern Ireland.SportIreland. (2017). Irish Sports Monitor Annual Report 2017. Ipsos MRBI.
4. Turner, N., Donoghue, O., Kenny, RA. (2018). Wellbeing and Health in Ireland’s over 50s 2009-2016.
5. Department of Health (2016) Healthy Ireland - Get Ireland Active! National physical activity plan for Ireland. http://www.getirelandactive.ie/Professionals/National-PA-Plan.pdf.
6. Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport (2018). National Sports Policy 2018 - 2027. http://www.dttas.ie/sites/default/files/publications/sport/english/national-sports-policy-2018-2027/national-sports-policy-2018.pdf.
7. National Implementation Research Network (2013). The Active Implementation Hub: Module 2 - Implementation Drivers.
8. Bauman, A., & Nutbeam, D. (2013). Evaluation in a nutshell: a practical guide to the evaluation of health promotion programs. Mcgraw hill.
CONTACT INFORMATION
[email protected] @JoeyJMurphy
[email protected] @JemBonQuiQui
Find out more at i-parc.ie or follow the project on twitter @IPARC_1
Effective
Interventions
Effective
Implementation
Enabling
Contexts Enabling
Contexts
• Regular physical activity (PA) is known to have many health benefits, making its promotiona key component of health promotion strategies worldwide 1.
• Although PA guidelines are reported in Ireland, insufficient numbers of children (13.5%)2,adults (32.6%) 3 and older adults (33%) 4 achieve them.
• In Ireland, the need for increased PA levels are emphasised by the National PhysicalActivity Plan (NPAP) 5 and the National Sports Policy 6.
• Guided by the National Implementation Research Network (NIRN) framework 7 (Figure 1),the Irish Physical Activity Research Collaboration (I-PARC) was established to play a keyrole in contributing to the outcomes of the NPAP.
Figure 1. Adapted from the NIRN Framework
Effective
Interventions
Effective
Implementation
Enabling
Contexts
Increased
population PA
levels
Update and key learnings from the Irish Physical Activity Research Collaboration
I-PARC uses a mixed methods approach through a partnership.
WP1
WP1 seeks to establish a
collaboration of key stakeholders in order
to enable effective knowledge translation.
WP2
WP2 involves the development of a
standardised evaluation framework (SEF) for assessing PA
interventions.
WP3
WP3 combines survey and interview methods to understand
implementation barriers and
facilitators of PA interventions in
Ireland
Research Advisory Panel
Practitioner Advisory Group
Participation events, social media and an I-PARC website have been successful for the
dissemination of the project aims, updates and outputs
Work on the SEF has led to key learnings around
creating a tool that is both effective and usable in
practice 8
Two surveys for examining factors related to
implementation have been developed and piloted. These
will be administered to service coordinators and
providers.
I-PARC has created a collaboration of key
stakeholders involved with PA promotion
across various sectors
Research Institutes
Government Departments & Agencies
PractitionersPA
Research Institutes Government Departments Government Agencies
Project Team
I-PARC is split into three work packages (WPs):
Joseph J Murphy1, Jemima Cooper1, Fiona Mansergh2, Benny Cullen3, Sarah O’Brien 4, Niamh Murphy 5, Marie H Murphy6, Shirley O’Shea, Peter Smyth2, Vydehi Muppavarapu2, Ronan Kielt7, James Lavelle8, Colette Brolly 9,
Enrique G Bengoechea1 and Catherine B Woods 1.