update on kyeamba creek nafe study

20
1 Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study. (1)Intro the study (reminder) (2)Go over reviewers comments from NAFE special edition letter (3) Upscaling to Kyeamba data. Dr Greg Summerell. DECC Wagga Wagga NSW Mr Victor Shoemark. DPI Wagga Wagga NSW Sandy Grant DECC Wagga Wagga NSW Jeff Walker University of Melbourne

Upload: tejano

Post on 31-Jan-2016

22 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study. Intro the study (reminder) Go over reviewers comments from NAFE special edition letter Upscaling to Kyeamba data. Dr Greg Summerell. DECC Wagga Wagga NSW Mr Victor Shoemark. DPI Wagga Wagga NSW Sandy Grant DECC Wagga Wagga NSW - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

1

Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study.

(1) Intro the study (reminder)

(2) Go over reviewers comments from NAFE special edition letter

(3) Upscaling to Kyeamba data.

Dr Greg Summerell. DECC Wagga Wagga NSW

Mr Victor Shoemark. DPI Wagga Wagga NSW

Sandy Grant DECC Wagga Wagga NSW

Jeff Walker University of Melbourne

Page 2: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

2

Kyeamba Creek monitoring network

Page 3: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

3

Livingstone Creek Study area

Page 4: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

4

Field sampling (3 samples per site).

Page 5: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

5

Page 6: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

6

Page 7: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

7

Page 8: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

8

Page 9: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

9

PUBLICATION Submitted to NAFE special edition.

Using passive microwave response to soil moisture change for soil mapping: A case study for the Livingstone Creek Catchment

Quickly present the paper

Discuss reviewers comments.

Page 10: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

10

Soil Moisture: Continuous trace, Discrete field sample, PLMR Brightness

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

30/1

0/06

1/11

/06

3/11

/06

5/11

/06

7/11

/06

9/11

/06

11/1

1/06

13/1

1/06

15/1

1/06

17/1

1/06

19/1

1/06

21/1

1/06

23/1

1/06

25/1

1/06

27/1

1/06

29/1

1/06

% M

ois

ture

Vo

lum

etr

ic v

/v

150

170

190

210

230

250

270

290

PL

MR

Bri

gh

tne

ss

60cm

5cm

Field soil moisture

PLMR Brightness

Page 11: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

11

PLMR Brightnessimages

Page 12: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

12

Major geological features

Page 13: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

13

Subtle differences between soil landscapes

Page 14: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

14

Differences at soil facet level (Ridge tops, mid and lower slopes on a hillslope).

Page 15: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

15

Reviewers comments

Both reviewers agree that your topic can be a useful important addition to the literature--particularly as it is one of first addressing the apparent correlation of spatial soil moisture patterns to landscape controls. However, both reviewers also agree that the connection needs to be made more strongly and more quantitatively, and I would agree.

Page 16: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

16

Comments continued

More needs to be done to establish that these surface patterns are attributable to soil characteristics and not precipitation patterns (which is not discussed).

You use a qualitative visual approach where a statistical approach would be more in place. If you truly calculate the spatial correlation between the two maps, the comparison study would become more valuable for the scientific community.

Page 17: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

17

Correlating Spatial patterns:

Observed Predicted

Observed not Predicted

Observed and PredictedPredicted not Observed

Not Observed Andnot Predicted

Page 18: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

18

Comments

In your letter you describe the strong relationship between soil properties and low frequency brightness temperatures. Scientists where already aware of this relationship since the seventies (e.g. Hipp, 1974 IEEE; Schmugge 1975: JGR; Eagleman and Lin 1976 JGR). I believe that a small section of the early work in the introduction would be good addition.

Page 19: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

19

Comments continued

Try to use polarization ratios (Tbh/Tbv) in figure 2 in stead of brightness temperatures. Now the brightness temperatures are mainly a function of soil moisture and temperature (vegetation contribution is apparently very small). With the use of polarization ratio you eliminate the effect of temperature. I also expect that the correlation will increase.

Page 20: Update on Kyeamba Creek NAFE study

20

Future work: Down Scaling From Kyeamba Creek to Livingstone Creek (not up scaling).