Updates on Implementation of ISO 50001 in the U.S.

Prakash  Rao  

Lawrence  Berkeley  National  Laboratory    

EEMODS  2013  Rio  de  Janeiro,  Brazil  

Topics

1. U.S.  leadership  in  ISO  50001    2. Superior  Energy  Performance  (SEPTM)  demonstration  

plant  outcomes  3. Development  of  Qualified  Workforce  4. U.S.  DOE  Better  Buildings,  Better  Plants  initiative  5. Release  of  Energy  Performance  Indicator  Tool  v3.0  6. Next  Steps  for  SEPTM  and  Better  Plants  7. Global  Superior  Energy  Performance  (GSEP)  

   

Developed  by    ISO  Project  Committee  242:  United  States  and  Brazil  lead  effort  with  United  Kingdom  

         and  China  U.S.  leadership  supported  through  U.S.  DOE  

New  international  best  practice  in  energy  management  Emphasis  on  collection  and  analysis  of  available  energy  data    

           to  support  energy  management  decision-­making,  and  improve:  Ability  to  benchmark,  measure  and  report  Transparency  and  communication  to  management  Operations  and  capital  cost  decisions  

Flexible  and  limited  documentation  requirements  (compared  to  ISO  14001)    focus  is  on  energy  performance  Published  in  2011,  including  input  from  56  countries    

   

 http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/management-­standards/iso50001.htm  

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/energymanagement/    

ISO 50001: Energy Management Standard

Implementing ISO 50001

Designed  to  be  used  independently,  yet  can  be  aligned  or  integrated  with  other  management  systems  (e.g.,  ISO  9001  and  ISO  14001).      Certification  is  not  required  to  benefit  from  use  of  ISO  50001  Does  not  prescribe  specific  performance  criteria  or  results with  respect  to  energy.    Requires a skilled energy management workforce to implement the energy management system (EnMS) and conduct conformance audits  Needs  enabling  policies  to  realize  its  global  potential  for  GHG  emissions  reductions  

In  the  US,  the  enabling  policy  for  ISO  50001  is  called  Superior  Energy  Performance  (SEPTM)  

ISO 50001 Components in place:

Top Management Energy Team Policy Planning Baseline Performance Metrics

Superior Energy PerformanceTM

Single facility ISO 50001 conformance with verified energy performance improvement

ISO 50001 ISO 50001 is a foundational tool that any organization can use to manage energy.

SEPTM Certification Requirements A  market-­based,  ANSI-­ANAB  accredited  certification  program  that  provides  industrial  and  commercial  facilities  with  a  roadmap  for  achieving  continual  improvement  in  energy  efficiency  while  boosting  competitiveness.      Certification Requirements:  An  ANSI-­ANAB  accredited  Verification  Body  conducts  a  third-­party  audit  to  verify  that  the  following  requirements  are  met:  

1. Energy  management  system  conformance  to  ISO  50001  2. Achieve  and  document  energy  performance  improvement  

   

4  

3M Allsteel Ascend Performance Materials Bentley Prince Street Bridgestone Tire Coca-­Cola CCP Composites Cooper Tire Cummins

Curtiss-­Wright Flow Control Company Didion Milling, Inc Dixie Chemical Dow Chemical Eaton Freescale Semiconductors General Dynamics Gerdau Harbec Inc.  

Haynes International Ingersoll Rand

Lockheed Martin Mack Trucks MedImmune Neenah Foundry Company Nissan North American Höganäs

OLAM Spices Owens Corning Republic Conduit Schneider Electric Spirax Sarco UTC/Sikorsky United States Mint Volvo World Kitchen

States,  regions,  and  utilities  are  partnering  with  U.S.  DOE  to  support  SEPTM  demonstrations  in  companies  across  the  country.    

 

www.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/tech_deployment/sep_demonstrations.html    5  

SEPTM Demonstrations

Corporate Industrial Participants: Green highlight indicates company with one or more certified facility

Facility Name

Facility Wide Verified %

Energy Performance Improvement

Volvo Trucks, NA | Dublin,  VA   25.8

Dow Chemical Company | Texas  City,  TX:  Manufacturing  facility   17.1

3M Canada Company | Brockville,  Ontario,  Canada 15.2 Cook Composites and Polymers | Houston,  TX   14.9

General Dynamics | Scranton,  PA   11.9 Allsteel | Muscatine,  IA   10.2

Cooper Tire | Texarkana,  AR   10.1 Olam Spices | Gilroy,  CA   9.8

Owens Corning | Waxahachie,  TX   9.6 Dow Chemical Company | Texas  City,  TX:  Energy  systems  

facility   8.1

Nissan, NA | Smyrna,  TN   7.2 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | West  Austin,  TX   6.5

3M Company| Cordova,  IL   6.2 Bridgestone Americas Tire | Wilson,  NC   16.8

6  

SEPTM Program Certifications 14  facilities  SEPTM  certified.  Nine  SEP  certified  facilities  offered  data  to  DOE.  Results  from  nine  plants  averaged  10%  improvement  in  energy  performance  over  business-­as-­usual  in  the  first  18  months  of  SEP  implementation.    Cost  savings  on  average  $503,000  per  year  from  operational  improvements  (low/no  cost  investment)  attributable  to  SEP.  77%  of  savings  from  operational  improvements  and  23%  from  capital  projects.    

7  

Analysis of SEPTM demonstration sites Energy Savings Percentages

Facilities  required  longer  than  one  quarter  to  implement  an  EnMS.    SEPTM  attributable  savings  start  in  +Q2  when  EnMS  implementation  start  to  impact  energy  savings.  

Taken  from:  Peter  Therkelsen,  Ridah  Soubani,  Aimee  McKane,  and  Paul  Scheihing.  (2013).  Assessing  the  Costs  and  Benefits  of  the  Superior  Energy  Performance  Program,  2013  ACEEE  Summer  Study  on  Energy  Efficiency  in  Industry,  Niagara  Falls,  NY    

8  

Analysis of SEPTM demonstration sites Payback

period) reporting SEPin SEP toble(attributa SavingsEnergy lOperationaCoststion Implementa SEP and EnMS

BenefitsCosts

TMTM

TM

Capital energy performance improvement action costs and savings not included.

< 2 year payback for > 0.28 PJ Meets typical industry hurdle rate.

SEPTM certification payback related to baseline energy consumption. < 2 year payback for facility with > 0.27 Tbtu (0.28 PJ) baseline annual source energy consumption.

Taken  from:  Peter  Therkelsen,  Ridah  Soubani,  Aimee  McKane,  and  Paul  Scheihing.  (2013).  Assessing  the  Costs  and  Benefits  of  the  Superior  Energy  Performance  Program,  2013  ACEEE  Summer  Study  on  Energy  Efficiency  in  Industry,  Niagara  Falls,  NY    

Qualified Workforce SEPTM  is  helping  to  build  a  workforce  qualified  to  apply  ISO  50001  effectively  and  to  verify  its  conformance  and  resulting  energy  performance  improvement  

Certified Practitioners in Energy Management Systems (CP EnMS): Help  facilities  implement  ISO  50001  and  prepare  for  SEPTM  certification  (74  certified  as  of  Oct  2013)  ISO 50001 Auditor

  Perform  third-­party  conformance  audits  to  ISO  50001  Certified Practitioner in Systems:    Four  planned-­  perform  compressed  air,  process  heating,  pumping,  or  steam  system  assessments  using  ASME  system  assessment  standards  

http://www.superiorenergyperformance.net/certified_practitioners.html  

Institute  for  Energy  Management  Professionals  (IEnMP)    

http://www.ienmp.com/    

SEP Lead Auditors and SEP Performance Verifiers:      Perform  third-­party  audits  to  verify  that  a  facility  meets  SEPTM  requirements  (10  Lead  Auditors  and  16  Performance  Verifiers  as  of  Oct  2013)  

Better Buildings, Better Plants Program

Voluntary  pledge  program  between  U.S.  manufacturing  companies  and  the  U.S.  DOE  to  improve  energy  intensity  of  manufacturing  operations  by  25%  over  10  years  Partners  establish  energy  performance  baselines  based  on  U.S.  DOE  guidance  and  consistent  with  ISO  50001  In  return  for  pledging,  U.S.  DOE  offers:  

Technical  assistance  towards  tracking  progress  towards  pledge  achievement  National  recognition  for  Partners  with  additional  recognition  for  pledge  achievers  

123  Partners  have  taken  the  pledge  Represents  8%  of  the  total  U.S.  manufacturing  energy  footprint  

Better Buildings, Better Plants Program Recent Achievements

12  new  Partners  in  past  12  months,  including:   Accomplishment Total

Number  of  Partner  Companies   123  

Approximate  Number  of  Plants   1,750  

Reported Savings

Cumulative  Energy  Savings  through  8/2013  (TBtu)  

190  (200  PJ)  

Cumulative  Cost  Savings  through  8/2013  (Million)  

$1,000  

Average  Energy  Intensity  Improvement  in  2012  

2.7%  

2013  Snapshot  of  Program  achievements  

Better Plants Challenge

Buildings  Initiative  (BBI)  BBI  seeks  to  reduce  energy  intensity  in  the  commercial  and  industrial  sectors  by  20%  in  2020  Challenge  Partners  pledge  to  reduce  energy  intensity  by  25%  in  10  years  with  additional  level  of  transparency  including:  

Sharing  energy  performance  data  Conduct  showcase  projects  that  demonstrate  near  term  energy  savings  

13  U.S.  manufacturers  have  taken  the  Challenge    

 

-­ 3M

-­ Alcoa

-­ Briggs & Stratton

-­ Cummins

-­ Ford Motor Company

-­ General Electric

-­ Harbec, Inc.

-­ Johnson Controls, Inc.

-­ Legrand N. America

-­ Nissan N. America

-­ Saint-­Gobain Corp

-­ Schneider Electric

-­ The J.R. Simplot

Company

Energy Performance Indicator Tool v3.0

Developed  by  U.S.  DOE  to  assist  plant  and  corporate  managers:  Establish  an  energy  consumption  baseline  Develop  a  regression  model  to  predict  energy  consumption  based  on  variables  such  as  production  and  weather  Track  annual  energy  intensity  improvements  against  the  baseline  Calculate  energy  savings  against  the  baseline  Calculate  performance  indicators  for  SEPTM  and  Better  Plants  

Spreadsheet  based  and  downloadable  for  free  at:  https://ecenter.ee.doe.gov/EM/tools/Pages/EnPI.aspx  

Next Steps for SEPTM and Better Plants

SEPTM  Enterprise  Accelerator  Directed  to  Better  Plants  partners  that  want  to  implement  SEPTM,  including  ISO  50001,  across  multiple  facilities  creating  opportunities  for  economies  of  scale  in  deploying  SEPTM  

 SEPTM    Ratepayer-­Funded  Program  Accelerator    

U.S.  DOE  will  be  working  with  several  utilities  and  energy  efficiency  program  administrators  to  develop  an  implementation  model  for  SEPTM  that  meets  regulatory  requirements  for  offering  incentives  to  their  industrial  customers.      

GSEP Energy Management Working Group (EMWG) goal:    Implementation  of  an  EnMS  and  ISO  50001  becomes  common  practice  as  part  of  continual  improvement  of  energy  performance  in  industrial  and  commercial  facilities  and  companies.  

EMWG Strategic Objectives:  1. Energy Management:  Increase  the  implementation  of  energy  

management  in  the  industrial  and  buildings  sectors  in  order  to  improve  energy  efficiency  and  energy  performance  on  an  ongoing  basis  

2. Measurement and Verification (M&V): Measure  and  verify  energy  performance  improvements  on  a  consistent  basis  

3. Qualified Workforce:  Build  a  qualified  workforce  of  professionals  with  expertise  in  the  fields  of  energy  management,  energy  efficiency,  and  measurement  and  verification  

Global Superior Energy Performance (GSEP) Partnership

The  Clean  Energy  Ministerial  (CEM)  is  a  high-­level  global  forum  to  promote  policies  and  programs  that  advance  clean  energy  technology,  to  share  lessons  learned  and  best  practices,  and  to  encourage  the  transition  to  a  global  clean  energy  economy.    The    GSEP  EMWG  is  one  of  six  working  groups  created  through  the  CEM.  

http://www.cleanenergyministerial.org

United  States  Denmark   India  Canada   European  Commission  

Australia   South  Africa   Sweden  Japan   Mexico  Korea  

Links

Superior  Energy  PerformanceTM:  http://www.superiorenergyperformance.net/  

U.S.  DOE  Better  Buildings,  Better  Plants:  http://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/tech_assistance/betterplants/index.html  

U.S.  DOE  Advanced  Manufacturing  Office:  http://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/