updates to the rpki certificate policy

7
Updates to the RPKI Certificate Policy Steve Kent BBN Technologies

Upload: pules

Post on 06-Jan-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Updates to the RPKI Certificate Policy. Steve Kent BBN Technologies. Reminder: What is the RPKI CP?. There is exactly one CP for the whole RPKI All CA’s operating in the RPKI MUST include the OID for the CP in every (RPKI) certificate they issue - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Updates to the RPKI Certificate Policy

Updates to the RPKI Certificate Policy

Steve Kent

BBN Technologies

Page 2: Updates to the RPKI Certificate Policy

Reminder: What is the RPKI CP?

• There is exactly one CP for the whole RPKI

• All CA’s operating in the RPKI MUST include the OID for the CP in every (RPKI) certificate they issue

• Thus, all prospective RPKI CA’s (IANA, RIRs, NIRs, LIRs/ISPs) REALLY OUGHT to pay attention to this document, and provide feedback!

Page 3: Updates to the RPKI Certificate Policy

Top Level View of Changes

• In response to comments from Andrei at IETF 73, we revised the CP to move details to the CPS, where appropriate

• Reduced page count from 47 to 41 (despite adding new boilerplate)

• Could probably drop a few more pages if we move the audit outline to the CPS too

• Changed scope to be broader, not just ROAs

Page 4: Updates to the RPKI Certificate Policy

What was Moved

• Time constraints to publish a new certificate or CRL

• Enrollment details

• Time constraints for notification of certificate issuance

• CRL issuance frequency

Page 5: Updates to the RPKI Certificate Policy

What was Removed

• Requirement to publish a new ROA before the old one expires

• Requirement for CAs to perform PoP

• All sections marked “omitted” were deleted (but section numbering was retained)

• Some informative references

• Discussions of the default TA model

Page 6: Updates to the RPKI Certificate Policy

What Next?• This document is not likely to become

much smaller

• Attorneys who have experience with PKI documents would see this as very reasonable in size and scope

• They also appreciate the parallelism to RFC 3647

• I’d like to request review, again, by any party who will act as a CA in the RPKI

• Then, let’s go to WGLC

Page 7: Updates to the RPKI Certificate Policy

Questions?