uruguay’s experience
TRANSCRIPT
• Soils conservation: from traditional plowing to no-till systems, that embrace over 90% of area
Intensification of agricultural production must be sustainable
Context: need to consider several goals
at the same time
1. Produce more food and raw matters.
2. Minimize negative impacts to environment .
3. Build resilience to CC.
Institutional framework for climate change coordination: institutional set up and mechanism,
regulatory/policy/strategic framework
• National System of Response to Climate Change (SNRCC)
• Climate, Water and Environment Cabinet and Secretary.
• Ministry of Environment (MVOTMA): CC Division, focal point.
• Ministry of Agriculture (MGAP): Agriculture & CC Unit (UACC, created in 2000), part of Agricultural Planning and PoliciesOffice + networking
• Local governments actions.
With FAO support: progress to answer keyquestions
¿Adatp to what/where/who
, how?
¿How to reduce vulnerability and build resilience?
Initiatives related to Uruguay NAP and agriculture/climate policy
• Diagnosis and general strategy (2010)
• National Policy for CC (2016)
• TNA (2015)
• National Communications (3rd in 2010, 4th to be presented in June 2016)
• Battery of initiatives on.going: • Adaptation Fund project,
• DACC project,
• EWS
• Index insurances
• Soil Conservation policy,
• Water policy (water harvest, suplementary irrigation),
• NAP GSP for non-LCD (UNEP-UNDP)
Best practice of climate financing/fiscal framework as a means to leverage domestic and international
financial support
• COMAP: National system that promotes investments: projectswith adaptation and mitigations proposals recieve extra pointsin the evaluation process.
• Subsidies to index insurances
• Adaptation Fund and DACC projects (subsidies to investmentand technical assistance) with farmers´counterpart and revolving funds
From 2008 to 2014 werepromoted investmentsin irrigation projects of
US$ 140 million,
through a tax waiver
that surpassed US$ 76 million
Investment Promotion Policy (COMAP)
Adaptation to climate change
TOTAL INVESTMENT
(US$)
FISCAL EXEMPTION
(US$)% of
exemption2010 10.072.221 5.465.841 54%2011 8.801.298 4.507.704 51%2012 19.936.328 10.931.598 55%2013 27.177.041 14.206.371 52%
2014* 73.807.461 41.026.796 56%TOTAL 139.794.683 76.138.311 55%
* Hasta junio
PronósticoClimatico del IRI
(3 meses)
Monitoreo y Pronóstico Balance Agua
Monitoreo y Pronóstico Pasturas
MonitoreoExistencias
(SNIG)
EWS
Productores familiares
DGDR
Mapas de Riesgo
Serie histórica de 30 años de NDVI
Datos satelitales MODIS/LTDRVacas de cría por sección policialMapa de uso del suelo
Herramienta de tarificación
Suma asegurada por SP
Risk characterization and index insurances
Promotion of associative projects
Application of new criteria to guide investment promotion - COMAP
Water for livestock and irrigation
Adaptation to climate change
Entry points for sectoral integration in NAP process and NAP Ag project
• Actors map
• Mainstreaming adaptation in sustainable developmentpolicies. Co-benefits approach.
• Climate resilient livelihoods in rural areas.
• Capacity building.
• Financial support to vulnerable stakeholders
• Assessing vulnerabilities and impacts for rural sector and society as a whole
• Align National and local govermnents plans and actions.
We see two integration challenges and paths
NAPs
Rural developmentpolicies and
plans
Agriculturaladaptation
plans
Some partial lessons so far…
• We know past better than future and we are notwell adapted to present. We haveunderestimated the lessons from the past.
• Agriculture is the most heterogeneous sector
• Policies based on science
• Farmers´ centered & ecosystem based adaptation
• Start from pesent needs by farmers
• Knowledge management (including impactsassessment) is key