u.s. department of the interior earthquake summary … · 11/15/2006  · u.s. department of the...

1
Russia China Japan Mongolia Japan North Korea South Korea Japan Japan United States Seoul Tokyo Kobe Taegu Pusan Osaka Jilin Sendai Dalian Anshan Harbin Kwangju Fukuoka Qingdao Inch`on Sapporo Qiqihar Yokohama Tangshan Changchun P'yongyang Khabarovsk Vladivostok Cheju Chita Wonsan Aomori Kanggye Magadan Yakutsk Nagasaki Ch'ongjin Ch'unch'on Birobidzhan Blagoveshchensk Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk Petropavloski-Kamchatskiy 120° 110° 130° 130° 140° 140° 150° 150° 160° 160° 170° 30° 40° 40° 50° 50° 60° Map prepared by U.S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Information Center 2006 Map not approved for release by Director USGS EARTHQUAKE SUMMARY MAP XXX U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DISCLAIMER Base map data, such as place names and political boundaries, are the best available but may not be current or may contain inaccuracies and therefore should not be regarded as having official significance. M8.3 Kuril Islands Earthquake of 15 November 2006 Kuril-KamchatkaTrench A' A Sea of Okhotsk Iturup Urup Simushir Onetokan Pacific Ocean 1973 1969 1918 1994 1978 1958 1978 1978 1995 1963 1963 1978 1916 1991 1918 1913 1915 1900 146° 146° 148° 148° 150° 150° 152° 152° 154° 154° 156° 156° 158° 43° 43° 45° 45° 47° 47° 49° 49° Epicentral Region Seismotectonic Setting Seismic Hazard EURASIA PLATE 74 mm/year 92 mm/year OKHOTSK PLATE NORTH AMERICA PLATE PACIFIC PLATE AMUR PLATE 2003 Kuril-Kamchatka Trench 88 mm/year Japan Trench Emperor Seamount Russia China Japan Russia North Korea South Korea Japan United States Seoul Tokyo Kobe Taegu Pusan Osaka Kyoto Jilin Sendai Harbin Fukuoka Sapporo Qiqihar Yokohama Changchun P'yongyang Khabarovsk Vladivostok Wonsan Aomori Matsuyama Ch'ongjin Ch'unch'on Birobidzhan Blagoveshchensk Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk Petropavloski-Kamchatskiy 120° 130° 130° 140° 140° 150° 150° 160° 160° 170° 170° 180° 30° 40° 40° 50° 50° 30° 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 250 Kilometers Scale 1:20,000,000 Scale 1:2,500,000 DISCUSSION The Kuril Islands earthquake of 15 November 2006, occurred as thrust-faulting on the boundary between the Pacific plate and the Okhotsk plate. In the region of the earthquake's epicenter, the Pacific plate moves northwest with respect to the Okhotsk plate with a velocity of about 90 mm/year. The Pacific plate subducts beneath the Okhotsk plate at the Kuril-Kamchatka Trench and becomes progressively deeper to the northwest, remaining seismically active to a depth of 680 km. The 15 November mainshock occurred at shallow depth within about 80 km of the trench axis. The 15 November earthquake is the largest earthquake to have occurred in the central Kuril Islands since the early 20th century. A central Kuril Islands earthquake in 1915 is estimated to have had a magnitude of about 8. The central Kuril Islands commonly experiences one or more shocks of magnitude 6 or greater in a decade. To the southwest, the southern Kuril Islands chain experienced a magnitude 8.5 earthquake in 1963. To the northeast, a magnitude 9 earthquake occurred offshore of Kamchatka in 1952. Significant Earthquakes Mag ≥ 7.5 Year Mn Dy Lat Long Dep Mag 1900 1 31 48.000 146.000 450 7.5 1913 8 1 47.500 155.500 0 7.7 1915 5 1 47.500 154.500 35 7.9 1916 10 31 45.400 154.000 0 7.6 1918 9 7 46.812 150.253 242 7.6 1918 11 8 43.816 152.775 63 7.5 1958 11 6 44.329 148.623 35 8.4 1963 10 13 44.770 149.798 13 8.6 1963 10 20 44.772 150.563 27 7.9 1969 8 11 43.478 147.815 45 8.2 1973 6 17 43.223 145.743 43 7.8 1978 3 23 44.982 148.523 21 7.6 1978 3 23 44.359 149.113 8 7.5 1978 3 24 44.233 148.923 12 7.5 1978 12 6 44.455 146.475 181 7.8 1991 12 22 45.615 151.010 25 7.6 1994 10 4 43.945 147.224 14 8.3 1995 12 3 44.663 149.300 33 7.9 Seismic hazard is expressed as peak ground acceleration (PGA) on firm rock, in meters/sec², expected to be exceeded in a 50-yr period with a probability of 10 percent. 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 250 Kilometers Scale 1:20,000,000 EXPLANATION Global Seismic Hazard 0 - 0.2 cm/sec² .2 - .4 .4 - .8 .8 - 1.6 1.6 - 3.2 3.2 - 6.4 6.4 - 9.8 -200 -200 -150 -150 -100 -100 -50 -50 0 0 50 50 100 100 150 150 -200 -200 -150 -150 -100 -100 -50 -50 Depth Section A A' DATA SOURCES EARTHQUAKES AND SEISMIC HAZARD USGS, National Earthquake Information Center NOAA, National Geophysical Data Center IASPEI, Centennial Catalog (1900 - 1999) and extensions (Engdahl and Villaseñor, 2002) HDF (unpublished earthquake catalog) (Engdahl, 2003) Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP, 1999) PLATE TECTONICS PB2002 (Bird, 2003) BASE MAP ESRI (1992), Digital Chart of the World GLOBE (1999) IOC, IHO, and BODC (2003) 0 100 200 300 400 50 Kilometers EXPLANATION 15 November 2006 Aftershocks Earthquake Magnitude 4.50 - 4.99 5.00 - 5.99 6.00 - 6.99 7.00 - 7.99 8.00 - 8.99 Earthquake Depth 0 - 65 km 65 - 300 300 - 600 Plate Boundary Subduction Transform Divergent Convergent Finite Fault Model REFERENCES Bird, P., 2003, An updated digital model of plate boundaries: Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., v. 4, no. 3, pp. 1027- 80. Engdahl, E.R. and Villaseñor, A., 2002, Global Seismicity: 1900 - 1999, chap. 41 of Lee, W.H.K., and others,eds., International Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, Part A: New York, N.Y., Elsevier Academic Press, 932 p. Engdahl, E.R., Van der Hilst, R.D., and Buland, R.P., 1998, Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination: Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., v. 88, p. 722-743. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., 1992, 1993, Digital Chart of the World: ESRI, Data Dictionary and CDROM(4), Redlands, Calif., USA. GLOBE Task Team and others, 1999, The Global Land One-Kilometer Base Elevation (GLOBE) Digital Elevation Model, Version 1.0: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colo., USA. IOC, IHO, and BODC, 2003, Centenary Edition of the GEBCO Digital Atlas: CD-ROM(2), British Oceanographic Data Centre, Liverpool, UK. Ji, C., D.J. Wald, and D.V. Helmberger, Source description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California earthquake; Part I: Wavelet domain inversion theory and resolution analysis, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., Vol 92, No. 4. pp. 1192-1207, 2002. Bassin, C., Laske, G. and Masters, G., The Current Limits of Resolution for Surface Wave Tomography in North America, EOS Trans AGU, 81, F897, 2000. FINITE FAULT MODEL Contributed by C. Ji, California Institute of Technology Distribution of the amplitude and direction of slip for subfault elements (small rectangles) of the fault rupture model are determined from the inversion of teleseismic body waveforms. Arrows indicate the amplitude and direction of slip (of the hanging wall with respect to the foot wall); the slip amount is also color-coded as shown. The view is from above, per- pendicular to the fault plane. The orientation of the finite fault plane may differ from the corresponding best double couple nodal plane depicted in the focal mechanism diagram on the main map. This is due to different methods of analysis. The strike of the fault rupture plane is 214 (S 34 W) and the dip is 15°. The dimensions of the subfault elements are 20 km in the strike direction and 12.5 km in the dip direction. EXPLANATION Slip, Finite Fault Model 0 - 100 100 - 200 200 -300 300 -400 400 -500 500 -600 600 -700 700 - 800 800 - 900 Kuril Islands, Russia 15 November 2006 11:14:16 UTC 46.616° N, 153.224° E Depth 28.5 km Mw = 8.3 (Harvard) A great earthquake occurred 495 km (305 miles) SSW of Severo-Kuril'sk, Kuril Islands, Russia and 1665 km (1030 miles) NE of Tokyo, Japan, at 5:14 AM MDT, Nov 15, 2006 (10:14 PM local time in Russia). The magnitude and location may be revised when additional data and further analysis results are available. Felt at Misawa and Yokosuka, Japan and at Petropavlovsk- Kamchatskiy, Russia. At least three docks at Crescent City, California, were damaged by a tsunami with a measured wave height of 1.8 m. Measured wave heights (peak-to-trough) of the tsunami: 0.60 m at Tokachi, 0.40 m at Nemuro and 0.20 m at Kushiro, Japan; 1.52 m at Kahului, 1.14 m at Haleiwa, 0.99 m at Waianae, 0.99 m at Hilo, 0.89 m at Nawiliwili and 0.89 m at Kalaupapa, Hawaii; 0.20 m at Shemya Island and 0.08 m at Amchitka Island, Alaska.

Upload: others

Post on 11-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR EARTHQUAKE SUMMARY … · 11/15/2006  · U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR EARTHQUAKE SUMMARY MAP XXX U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ... NORTH AMERICA PLATE

Russia

China

Japan

Mongolia

JapanNorth Korea

South Korea

JapanJapan

United States

Seoul

TokyoKobe

TaeguPusan

Osaka

Jilin

Sendai

Dalian

Anshan

Harbin

KwangjuFukuoka

Qingdao Inch`on

Sapporo

Qiqihar

Yokohama

Tangshan

Changchun

P'yongyang

Khabarovsk

Vladivostok

Cheju

Chita

Wonsan Aomori

Kanggye

Magadan

Yakutsk

Nagasaki

Ch'ongjin

Ch'unch'on

Birobidzhan

Blagoveshchensk

Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk

Petropavloski-Kamchatskiy

120°110°

130°

130°

140°

140°

150°

150° 160°

160°

170°

30°

40°

40°

50°

50°

60°

Map prepared by U.S. Geological SurveyNational Earthquake Information Center2006Map not approved for release by Director USGS

EARTHQUAKE SUMMARY MAP XXXU.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORU.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

DISCLAIMERBase map data, such as place names and politicalboundaries, are the best available but may not be current or may contain inaccuracies and thereforeshould not be regarded as having official significance.

M8.3 Kuril Islands Earthquake of 15 November 2006

Ku r i l -K amc h a t k a T r e n c h

A'

A

S e ao f

O k h o t s k

Iturup

Urup

Simushir

Onetokan

P a c i f i cO c e a n

1973

1969

19181994

19781958 1978

1978

1995 1963 1963

1978

19161991

1918

19131915

1900

146°

146°

148°

148°

150°

150° 152°

152°

154°

154°

156°

156°

158°

43°43°

45°45°

47°47°

49°49°

Epicentral Region

Seismotectonic Setting

Seismic Hazard

EURASIAPLATE

74 mm/year

92 mm/year

OKHOTSKPLATE

NORTH AMERICAPLATE

PACIFIC PLATE

AMUR PLATE

2003

Kuril-

Kamch

atka T

rench

88 mm/year

Japan

Trenc

h

Emperor Seamoun t

Russia

China

Japan

Russia

North Korea

South Korea

Japan

United States

Seoul

TokyoKobe

TaeguPusan

OsakaKyoto

Jilin

Sendai

Harbin

Fukuoka

Sapporo

Qiqihar

Yokohama

Changchun

P'yongyang

Khabarovsk

Vladivostok

Wonsan Aomori

Matsuyama

Ch'ongjin

Ch'unch'on

Birobidzhan

Blagoveshchensk

Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk

Petropavloski-Kamchatskiy

120°

130°

130°

140°

140°

150°

150° 160°

160°

170°

170°

180°

30°

40° 40°

50° 50°

30°

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Kilometers

Scale 1:20,000,000

Scale 1:2,500,000

DISCUSSIONThe Kuril Islands earthquake of 15 November 2006, occurred as thrust-faulting on theboundary between the Pacific plate and the Okhotsk plate. In the region of theearthquake's epicenter, the Pacific plate moves northwest with respect to the Okhotsk platewith a velocity of about 90 mm/year. The Pacific plate subducts beneath the Okhotsk plateat the Kuril-Kamchatka Trench and becomes progressively deeper to the northwest,remaining seismically active to a depth of 680 km. The 15 November mainshock occurredat shallow depth within about 80 km of the trench axis.The 15 November earthquake is the largest earthquake to have occurred in the centralKuril Islands since the early 20th century. A central Kuril Islands earthquake in 1915 isestimated to have had a magnitude of about 8. The central Kuril Islands commonlyexperiences one or more shocks of magnitude 6 or greater in a decade. To the southwest,the southern Kuril Islands chain experienced a magnitude 8.5 earthquake in 1963. To thenortheast, a magnitude 9 earthquake occurred offshore of Kamchatka in 1952.

Significant Earthquakes Mag ≥ 7.5

Year Mn Dy Lat Long Dep Mag1900 1 31 48.000 146.000 450 7.51913 8 1 47.500 155.500 0 7.71915 5 1 47.500 154.500 35 7.91916 10 31 45.400 154.000 0 7.61918 9 7 46.812 150.253 242 7.61918 11 8 43.816 152.775 63 7.51958 11 6 44.329 148.623 35 8.41963 10 13 44.770 149.798 13 8.61963 10 20 44.772 150.563 27 7.91969 8 11 43.478 147.815 45 8.21973 6 17 43.223 145.743 43 7.81978 3 23 44.982 148.523 21 7.61978 3 23 44.359 149.113 8 7.51978 3 24 44.233 148.923 12 7.51978 12 6 44.455 146.475 181 7.81991 12 22 45.615 151.010 25 7.61994 10 4 43.945 147.224 14 8.31995 12 3 44.663 149.300 33 7.9

Seismic hazard is expressed as peakground acceleration (PGA) on firmrock, in meters/sec², expected to beexceeded in a 50-yr period with aprobability of 10 percent.

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Kilometers

Scale 1:20,000,000

EXPLANATIONGlobal Seismic Hazard

0 - 0.2 cm/sec².2 - .4.4 - .8.8 - 1.61.6 - 3.23.2 - 6.46.4 - 9.8

-200

-200

-150

-150

-100

-100

-50

-50

0

0

50

50

100

100

150

150

-200 -200

-150 -150

-100 -100

-50 -50

Depth SectionA A'

DATA SOURCESEARTHQUAKES AND SEISMIC HAZARD USGS, National Earthquake Information Center NOAA, National Geophysical Data Center IASPEI, Centennial Catalog (1900 - 1999) and extensions (Engdahl and Villaseñor, 2002) HDF (unpublished earthquake catalog) (Engdahl, 2003) Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP, 1999)PLATE TECTONICS PB2002 (Bird, 2003)BASE MAP ESRI (1992), Digital Chart of the World GLOBE (1999) IOC, IHO, and BODC (2003)

0 100 200 300 40050Kilometers

EXPLANATION

15 November 2006

AftershocksEarthquake Magnitude

4.50 - 4.995.00 - 5.996.00 - 6.997.00 - 7.998.00 - 8.99

Earthquake Depth0 - 65 km65 - 300300 - 600

Plate BoundarySubductionTransformDivergentConvergent

Finite Fault Model

REFERENCESBird, P., 2003, An updated digital model of plate boundaries: Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., v. 4, no. 3, pp. 1027- 80.Engdahl, E.R. and Villaseñor, A., 2002, Global Seismicity: 1900 - 1999, chap. 41 of Lee, W.H.K., and others,eds.,International Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, Part A: New York, N.Y., Elsevier Academic Press, 932 p.Engdahl, E.R., Van der Hilst, R.D., and Buland, R.P., 1998, Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improvedtravel times and procedures for depth determination: Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., v. 88, p. 722-743.Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., 1992, 1993, Digital Chart of the World: ESRI, Data Dictionary andCDROM(4), Redlands, Calif., USA.GLOBE Task Team and others, 1999, The Global Land One-Kilometer Base Elevation (GLOBE) Digital ElevationModel, Version 1.0: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colo., USA.IOC, IHO, and BODC, 2003, Centenary Edition of the GEBCO Digital Atlas: CD-ROM(2), British OceanographicData Centre, Liverpool, UK.Ji, C., D.J. Wald, and D.V. Helmberger, Source description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California earthquake; Part I:Wavelet domain inversion theory and resolution analysis, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., Vol 92, No. 4. pp. 1192-1207, 2002.

Bassin, C., Laske, G. and Masters, G., The Current Limits of Resolution for Surface Wave Tomography in NorthAmerica, EOS Trans AGU, 81, F897, 2000.

FINITE FAULT MODELContributed byC. Ji, California Institute of TechnologyDistribution of the amplitude and direction of slip forsubfault elements (small rectangles) of the fault rupturemodel are determined from the inversion of teleseismic bodywaveforms. Arrows indicate the amplitude and direction ofslip (of the hanging wall with respect to the foot wall); theslip amount is also color-coded as shown. The view is fromabove, per-pendicular to the fault plane.The orientation of the finite fault plane may differ from thecorresponding best double couple nodal plane depicted in thefocal mechanism diagram on the main map. This is due todifferent methods of analysis.The strike of the fault rupture plane is 214 (S 34 W) and thedip is 15°. The dimensions of the subfault elements are 20km in the strike direction and 12.5 km in the dip direction.

EXPLANATIONSlip, Finite Fault Model

0 - 100100 - 200200 -300300 -400400 -500500 -600600 -700700 - 800800 - 900

Kuril Islands, Russia15 November 2006 11:14:16 UTC46.616° N, 153.224° EDepth 28.5 kmMw = 8.3 (Harvard)A great earthquake occurred 495 km (305 miles) SSW ofSevero-Kuril'sk, Kuril Islands, Russia and 1665 km (1030 miles)NE of Tokyo, Japan, at 5:14 AM MDT, Nov 15, 2006 (10:14 PMlocal time in Russia). The magnitude and location may berevised when additional data and further analysis results areavailable.Felt at Misawa and Yokosuka, Japan and at Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy, Russia. At least three docks at Crescent City,California, were damaged by a tsunami with a measured waveheight of 1.8 m. Measured wave heights (peak-to-trough) of thetsunami: 0.60 m at Tokachi, 0.40 m at Nemuro and 0.20 m atKushiro, Japan; 1.52 m at Kahului, 1.14 m at Haleiwa, 0.99 m atWaianae, 0.99 m at Hilo, 0.89 m at Nawiliwili and 0.89 m atKalaupapa, Hawaii; 0.20 m at Shemya Island and 0.08 m atAmchitka Island, Alaska.