us gaap, ifrs and indian gaap comparison

Upload: sanjeev-aggarwal

Post on 07-Apr-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    1/23

    ASSOCHAMSeminar on US GAAP, IFRS &

    Indian GAAP : A Comparison

    Related Party Transactions

    Abhijit SenChief Financial Officer

    Citibank, N.A.

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    2/23

    Presentation Path

    Need for regulation

    Who is a related party ?

    Related Party Transactions

    Indian GAAP AS 18

    Transfer Pricing Rules

    US GAAP FAS 57

    Regulation W and Section 23A and 23BInternational Accounting Standard IAS 24

    Comparative analysis

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    3/23

    Need for RegulationConglomerates carry on their various business / investment activities

    through subsidiaries or associates and acquire interests in otherenterprises. This results into multiple legal vehicles and overlapping

    activities. It also leads to complex business needs and structures

    Arms length of transactions and pricing may be at risk resulting into

    incorrect representation of financial position and operating results :

    The presumption that transactions in financial statements are done on an

    arms length basis between independent parties may not be valid.

    Related party may enter into transactions which unrelated parties would

    not enter into

    Transactions between related parties may not be effected at the same terms

    and conditions as between unrelated parties.

    Due to the above, financials may fail to reflect the correct picture while

    comparing with previous periods and with other enterprises

    Other issues, viz. revenue leakage for tax authorities, fiduciary nature

    of relationship with the enterprise, eg. directors,etc.

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    4/23

    Who is a Related Party ?

    Parties are considered to be related ifat any time during the reporting periodone party has the ability to control the

    other party or exercise significantinfluence over the other party inmaking financial and/or operating

    decisions

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    5/23

    Rel ted rt r s cti s

    Funded transactionsIntercompany lending and borrowing

    Non-fund based transactions

    Fee income for services rendered

    Sharing common resources

    Space sharing

    Management time for common directors,etc.

    Common use of other infrastructureOther transactions

    Purchase / Sale of goods

    Leasing of premises

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    6/23

    Indian GAAP AS 18Applicability

    Companies which are listed or are in process of listing

    Banks, financial institutions and insurance companies

    Enterprises having turnover > Rs. 50 cr.

    Enterprises having borrowings > Rs. 10 cr.

    Holding / subsidiary company of any of the above

    Related Parties

    Holding companies, subsidiaries and fellow subsidiaries

    Associates and joint ventures

    Individuals (incl. their relatives) having voting powergiving them control or significant influence

    Key management personnel incl.their relatives

    Enterprises where controlling individual or key managerial

    personnel has significant influence

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    7/23

    Indian GAAP AS 18contd.

    Disclosure requirements

    Related parties

    Name and nature of relationship irrespective of

    whether or not there have been transactions betweenthem

    Related party transactions

    Name of the party and description of the relationshipVolume of transactions

    Outstanding balances on balance sheet date

    Amounts written off / written back

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    8/23

    Indian GAAP AS 18contd.

    Other Key PointsNot applicable where confidentiality of data isrequired as per regulations eg. banks

    Following are deemed not to be related parties ;

    Two companies simply because they have a directorin common (unless the director is able to affect thepolicies of both companies in their mutual dealings)

    Single customer, supplier,franchiser, distributor orgeneral agent with whom significant volume ofbusiness is transacted

    Normal dealings with providers of finance, tradeunions, public utilities and government departments

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    9/23

    Transfer Pricing RulesCovered under Direct Taxes

    Exhaustive transfer pricing rules introduced in 2001

    Deals with computation of income arising from internationaltransactions between associated enterprises

    Discretionary powers to Assessing Officer - if he believes that

    less profits have accrued due to international transactions, hecan proceed to determine profits using the transfer pricingrules.

    Transfer Pricing Methods

    Comparable uncontrolled price methodResale price method

    Cost plus method

    Profit split method

    Transactional net margin method

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    10/23

    AS 18 and Transfer Pricing

    AS 18 Transfer PricingFor significant influence to exist,

    20% shareholding is necessary

    26% shareholding for applicability

    of transfer pricing

    Parties do not become relatedmerely because one is 100%

    dependent on the other

    These dependent parties will beassociated parties for the purpose

    of transfer pricing

    Focuses on disclosure for correct

    representation of financial

    statements

    Focuses on correct calculation of

    profits to determine the actual tax

    payable on them

    Applicable for all related parties

    whether situated locally or abroad

    Applicable only for international

    transactions. Local associates

    covered under S.40A(2)(b) of

    Income Tax Act.

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    11/23

    US GAAP - FAS 57

    Pronounced by FASB

    Related Party exhaustively covered also inStatement on Auditing Standard 6 (SAS 6)under US Regulations.

    Related PartiesParent company and its subsidiaries

    Subsidiaries of a common parent

    An enterprise and trusts for the benefit of employeeslike pension, etc.

    Principal owners, management, or members of theirimmediate families

    Affiliates

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    12/23

    US GAAP - FAS 57

    Disclosure requirements

    Related parties and transactions :

    Nature of relationshipDescription of the transaction

    Value of transactions

    Effects of change in method of establishing the

    terms from that used in the preceding period

    Outstanding items as at balance sheet date

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    13/23

    RegulationW and Sec. 23 A/B(Revised provisions under implementation)

    Regulation W of the Federal Reserve Board

    implements, interprets and applies the statutory

    provisions of Section 23 A and 23 B of the Federal

    Reserve Act.Section 23 A and B are intended to prevent the abuse

    of a banks resource in transactions with its affiliates

    These guidelines are intended to cover US Law

    requirements applicable for all US registered entities

    Applicability between bank chain entities and other

    affiliates under non-bank chain

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    14/23

    RegulationW and Sec. 23 A/B

    Section 23 A

    US Banks and their

    subsidiaries are restricted by

    Section 23 A from engagingin loans, purchases of assets,

    and other specified

    transactions with or

    involving their affiliatesunless limits in the amount

    of exposure to any one

    affiliate or all affiliates in

    the aggregate are observed

    Section 23 B

    Section 23 B is designed toensure that transactions

    between banks and their

    affiliates are on an armslength basis and at fairmarket value.

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    15/23

    RegulationW - Inter-company Transactions

    23A/B Affiliates23A/B Affiliates

    (also known as Corporate-chain)

    and any legal vehicle that is not a

    Bank-Chain Entity, which is 25

    percent or more owned or

    otherwise controlled, directly or

    indirectly, by Bank related group

    Bank Chain EntitiesBank Chain Entities

    any subsidiary that is a U.S.Bank

    and any legal vehicle 25 percent

    or more owned or otherwise

    controlled, directly or indirectly

    by a U.S. bank

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    16/23

    Sec. 23 A Transactions glimpseCovered

    transactions

    Extension of credit

    Purchasing and investing in securities

    Purchasing assets

    Acceptance of security as collateral for credit to third party

    Issuance/Confirmation of LC and Guarantee

    Cross affiliate netting arrangements

    Prohi itions Purchase of lo uality assetsnsafe and unsound transactions

    nsecured credit extensions

    Exemptions Transaction et een sister anksCorresp. anking deposits as ongoing orking alance

    Credit extensions secured y cash/govt.securities

    Intra-day extensions of credit

    Purchasing certain marketa le / municipal securities

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    17/23

    Sec. 23 B Transactions glimpse

    Coveredtransactions

    All S.23A covered transactionsSale of security/other asset (incl.repurchase agreements)

    Payment of money or furnishing a service

    Fees paid to affiliate to act as agent, broker,etc.

    Third party transaction where affiliate is interested

    Third party transaction where benefit is transferred to

    the affiliate

    Derivative transactions

    Intra-day credit extensions

    Prohibitions Purchasing securities/assets as a fiduciary unlesspermitted by trust instrument, etc.

    Restricted Underwriting Purchase

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    18/23

    RegulationW Requirement

    QUANTITATIVE LIMITS

    Covered Transactions between a Bank Chain Entity and

    a 23A/B Affiliate, unless exempt

    COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS

    Credit Transactions whereby a

    Bank Chain Entity extends credit

    to a 23A/B Affiliate, unless exempt

    MARKET TERMS

    All transactions of a Bank Chain Entity with a 23A/B

    Affiliate (including transactions subject to the Attribution

    Rule and the Special Situations), unless exempt.

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    19/23

    International AS IAS 24

    Related Parties

    Directly or indirectly controls, has interest or has joint

    control over the entity

    Associates of the entity

    Joint ventures

    Key management personnel of entity or its parent

    Close family member of any of the above

    Entities controlled, jointly controlled or significantly

    influenced / voting power by any of the key management

    personnel or their close family members

    Entities having post employment benefit plans for the

    benefits of employees of the entity, or of any of its related

    parties

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    20/23

    International AS IAS 24..contd.

    Disclosures in financial statementsNature of relationship even if there were notransactions between those related parties

    Name of the entities

    Compensation of key management personnelcategorised into short-term benefits, post-employment benefits, long-term benefits,terminationbenefits, equity compensation benefits

    Transactions between related partiesOutstanding balances

    Provisions for doubtful debts in respect of relatedparties

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    21/23

    Comparative Analysis

    IAS US GAAP Indian GAAPDisclose name of related

    party and nature of

    relationship and types of

    transactions. For control

    relationships givedisclosures regardless of

    whether transactions

    occur

    Some exemptionsavailable for separate

    financial statements of

    subsidiaries

    Similar to IAS

    Exemptions are

    narrower than

    under IAS

    Similar to IAS except

    for following additional

    disclosures:

    Volume of transactions

    Amounts written off /

    written back in respect

    of debts due from related

    parties

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    22/23

    Legal Books vs. Management Books

    Legal Books Management Books

    Focus on legal entity setup and

    financials based on accounting

    policies and practices which could be

    across business lines and products

    Focus on business lines and

    profitability based on business

    segments which could be across

    multiple legal entities

    Physical Billing and Service Level

    Agreements signed off for recovery

    of charges

    Allocation of costs on a mutually

    agreed basis is done across business

    functions to reflect correct segment

    profits

    Legal books reflect transactions with

    external parties

    Management books reflect internal

    funds transfer pricing system and cost

    plus margin system used for inter-

    department flow of funds / goods

  • 8/6/2019 US GAAP, IfRS and Indian GAAP Comparison

    23/23

    Thank you