u.s. marine fisheries management dr. louis b. daniel iii director n.c. division of marine fisheries
TRANSCRIPT
U.S. Marine Fisheries Management
Dr. Louis B. Daniel III
Director
N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries
Regulatory Bodies • Division of Marine Fisheries• Marine Fisheries Commission• Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission• Federal Fishery Management Councils• National Marine Fisheries Service• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Governing Legislation
• Fisheries Reform Act of 1997 (state)• Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (federal)• Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative
Management Act (federal)
Division of Marine Fisheries“Recommenders”
• Director’s proclamation authority to implement rules
• 321 staff to collect and analyze data to make sound recommendations to the various rulemaking bodies
• Very little direct authority• Wildlife Resources Commission• Implement Fisheries Reform Act
Marine Fisheries Commission“Deciders”
• Rulemaking authority for coastal waters out to three miles
• Approve fishery management plans• Authority laid out in Fisheries Reform Act
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission
• Compact of all east coast states to manage state coastal waters out to three miles
• Three members from each state cast a single vote
• Member states with a declared interest in a fishery must comply with management measures approved by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission
Federal FisheryManagement Councils
• N.C. membership on both the Mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic councils
• Three members from each state with separate votes
• Manage species from 3-200 miles offshore in the Exclusive Economic Zone
National Marine Fisheries Service
• Federal fisheries councils (Exclusive Economic Zone)
• Protected Resources• Highly Migratory Species• Enforcement in the Exclusive Economic Zone
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
• Protected Resources• Anadromous Species• Hatcheries
Technical Advice
• Plan development teams• Technical committees • Stock assessment committees• Assessment reviews• Science and Statistics Committee
Public Involvement
• Marine Fisheries Commission• Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission • Federal councils• Highly Migratory Species• Protected Resources
Process Example
Plan Development
TeamAdvisory
Committee
Marine Fisheries
Commission
Standing and Regional
Committees
Marine Fisheries
Commission
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Interjurisdictional(23 Species)
Completed: September 2002
Amended: June 2008
Initial Status:Varies by Species
Current Status:Varies by Species
Fishery Management Plan Measures• Adopted federal and interstate plans by
reference to comply with state law• Coordinated state efforts for participation
in federal and interstate plan processes• Set forth public outreach procedures for
federal and interstate issues
Improvements• Sustainable stocks– Summer flounder– Spiny Dogfish– Bluefish
Challenges• Weakfish• Snapper-Grouper• Sheepshead
Red Drum
Completed:March 2001
Amended:November 2008
Initial Status: Overfished
Current Status: Recovering
Fishery Management Plan Measures• Reduced recreational bag limit from
five fish to one• Implemented commercial trip limit• Prohibited harvest over 27 inches
Improvements• Two recent stock assessments show North
Carolina has achieved a stock rebuilding goal set by Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission in 2002− N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries in 2007− Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission in 2009
Challenges• Management of a recovering fishery
River Herring
FMP Completed: February 2000
Amended: September 2007
Initial Status: Depleted (Albemarle Sound)Unknown (Other Waters)
Current Status: Depleted (Albemarle Sound)Unknown (Other Waters)
FMP Measures• No-harvest provision• Allows discretionary fishery for research
purposes and to benefit cultural festival• Funding for research• Designation of anadromous fish
spawning areas
Improvements• Research - Albemarle Sound
Management Area— Spawning area survey— Migration impediment survey— Expanded juvenile sampling, commercial
pound net survey, water quality monitoring
Challenges• Impacts from harvest closure still unknown
Prognosis?