US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 1

Slides for the US Si Tracker Institutional Group Leaders Meeting

J. Incandela

March 1, 2005

US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 2

US CMS Tracker Group

• Brown University• R. Hooper, G. Landsberg, C. Nguyen, H. Nguyen

• University of California, Riverside (UCR)• P. Gartung, G. Hanson, G.Y. Jeng, G. Pasztor

• University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB)• A. Affolder, S. Burke, C. Campagnari, F. Garberson, D. Hale, J. Incandela, • P. Kalavase, S. Kyre, J. Lamb, R. Taylor, D. Stuart, D. White + technicians

• University of Illinois, Chicago (UIC)• E. Chabalina, C. Gerber, L. Nigra, T. Ten

• Fermilab (FNAL)• M. Demarteau, A. Ronzhin, K. Sogut, L. Spiegel, S. Tkaczyk + technicians

• University of Kansas (KU)• P. Baringer, A. Bean, L. Christofek, D. Coppage

• Mexican Consortium: • Cinvestav: H. Castilla, R. Perez, A. Sanchez• Puebla: E. Medel, H. Salazar• San Luis Potosi: A. Morelos

• University of Rochester (UR)• R.Demina, R. Eusebi, E. Halkiadakis, A. Hocker, S. Korjenevski, P. Tipton

20 joined group this past year – few more needed at both sites10 left the group (includes KSU)

20 joined group this past year – few more needed at both sites10 left the group (includes KSU)

US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 3

US Group Activity

• US Group Leaders Meeting – monthly or as needed• Discuss resources, planning, etc.

• US Production Meeting – Weekly• Keep track of quality, schedule, problems

• All major tasks report.

• Experts understood to be meeting regularly.

• One expert representative for each task will make summary report in the Production meeting.

• Will start next week.

US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 4

SST Schedule

Completion: Jan. 2006

An aggressive schedule

US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 5

Schedule Outlook

• Parts• Sensor: HPK – yields very high – quality excellent

• Fairly confident all Sensors will arrive by November – even if we increase order from 16400 to ~18000

• Hybrids: Cicorel – quality good – yields rising• Recent batches were very good

• Went from slightly behind the original schedule to slightly ahead• The exceptionally good new batches included TOB

• Looks like all TOB hybrids could be in hand before Europe closes for August

• Module Production• Open issues: Approval of Ag epoxy fix, Encapsulation• Start now: 6-9 per day (30 per site this week) • Following 4 weeks: ~50/w/site• Following 4 weeks: ~75/w/site• Steady state after that: ~100/w/site

• Cannot exceed ~ 60-70/w/site until multi-rod burn-in is going. • Without rods, need overnight cycling in Wien box for thermal check. • Gives us 5 to 8 weeks to get the rod production up to snuff.

US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 6

Planning

• We will focus heavily on TOB initially, with the possibility of completing all rods by early Autumn being considered.

• Then, UCSB will be full time TEC module production.

• Meanwhile, we build a team up at CERN for I&C

US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 7

UCSB Assembly Plate/Capacity

Total of 24 plates(#) = plates added in 2004

Module type Completed Plates

Plates In Process Total Daily Capacity

(# modules)

TOB r-phi 7 (2) 7 21

TOB stereo 3 (1) 3 9

TEC R5P 2 (2) 1 3 9

TEC R5S 2 (2) 1 3 9

TEC R6 5 (4) 5 15

TEC R7 2 (2) 1 3 9

US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 8

TEC R7

TEC R6 TEC R5P TEC R5S

TOB r-phi TOB stereo

Module Types Built in US

US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 9

Tracker Management Structure

Proposed Solution to Management Structure• Must involve all Talented People in the Success of the Project

• Propose to Manage the Project with a Management Board

• Each Member with assigned Specific Responsibility

• Propose the Management Board meets ~ once each Month

• Management Board meets at different Tracker Institutions :• Visit labs, Meets people doing the work, understands Problems/Common

Solutions

• Receive Reports, Technical Status, Financial Status, Anticipate Future Problems

• Manage the Project to meet Schedule and Budget

• Develop the CMS Tracker Management Team

Slide taken from Peter Sharp’s presentation

US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 10

Tracker Management Structure

Tracker Management Board

1 Peter Sharp Project Manager

2 Didier Contardo TEC - France

3 Geoff Hall Head of the Project Office UK

4 Roland Horisberger Pixels Switzerland

5 Joe Incandela TOB USA

6 Marcello Mannelli QA and Schedules

7 Stefan Schael TEC + Germany

8 Roberto Tenchini Resources (Finance & People)

9 Guido Tonelli TIB / TID Italy

10 Guenter Flugge Tracker Institution Board

Slide taken from Peter Sharp’s presentation

US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 11

Tracker Management Structure

Proposed Project Structure

Slide taken from Peter Sharp’s presentation

US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 12

Tracker Management Structure

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Slide taken from Peter Sharp’s presentation

US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 13

Management

• Tracker Construction Board• Currently 2D

• Columns: TIB/TOB/TEC/PIXELS

• Rows: Module Production, Integration: Tracker/Electronics/Software

• May add more technical rows

• Names not settled