u.s. vs. lopez 115 s.ct. 1624

Upload: thalia-sanders

Post on 29-May-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 U.S. vs. Lopez 115 S.Ct. 1624

    1/54

    Westlaw Delivery Summary Report for PATRON ACCESS,-

    Date/Time of Request: Monday, August 23, 2010 13:58 EasternClient Identifier: PATRON ACCESS

    Database: SCTFIND

    Citation Text: 115 S.Ct. 1624

    Lines: 3391

    Documents: 1

    Images: 0

    business law 2 double check 317 us. illionois, 63 st. 82, 1942 u.s lexix 1046 (1942)

    The material accompanying this summary is subject to copyright. Usage is governed by contract with Thomson Reuters,

    West and their affiliates.

  • 8/9/2019 U.S. vs. Lopez 115 S.Ct. 1624

    2/54

    Supreme Court of the United StatesUNITED STATES, Petitioner

    v.

    Alfonso LOPEZ, Jr.

    No. 93-1260.

    Argued Nov. 8, 1994.

    Decided April 26, 1995.

    Defendant was convicted in the United States Dis-

    trict Court for the Western District of Texas, H.F.

    Garcia, J., of possessing firearm in school zone in

    violation of Gun-Free School Zones Act, and he ap-pealed. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit,

    Garwood, Circuit Judge, 2 F.3d 1342, reversed and

    remanded with directions, and government peti-

    tioned for certiorari review. After granting certior-

    ari, 114 S.Ct. 1536, the United States Supreme

    Court, Chief Justice Rehnquist, held that Gun-Free

    School Zones Act, making it federal offense for any

    individual knowingly to possess firearm at place

    that individual knows or has reasonable cause to

    believe is school zone, exceeded Congress' com-

    merce clause authority, since possession of gun in

    local school zone was not economic activity that

    substantially affected interstate commerce.

    Affirmed.

    Justice Kennedy filed concurring opinion in which

    Justice O'Connor joined.

    Justice Thomas filed concurring opinion.

    Justices Stevens and Souter filed dissenting opin-

    ions.

    Justice Breyer filed dissenting opinion, in which

    Justices Stevens, Souter and Ginsburg joined.

    West Headnotes

    [1] Commerce 83 5

    83 Commerce

    83I Power to Regulate in General

    83k2 Constitutional Grant of Power to Con-

    gress

    83k5 k. Commerce among the states.

    Most Cited Cases

    Test for determining whether activity is within

    Congress' power to regulate under commerce clause

    is whether it substantially affects interstate com-

    merce. U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 1, 8, cl. 3.

    [2] Commerce 83 5

    83 Commerce

    83I Power to Regulate in General

    83k2 Constitutional Grant of Power to Con-

    gress

    83k5 k. Commerce among the states.

    Most Cited Cases

    Where economic activity substantially affects inter-

    state commerce, federal legislation regulating that

    activity will be sustained. U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 1,

    8, cl. 3.

    [3] Criminal Law 110 5

    110 Criminal Law

    110I Nature and Elements of Crime

    110k2 Power to Define and Punish Crime

    110k5 k. States. Most Cited Cases

    States 360 4.4(2)

    360 States

    360I Political Status and Relations

    360I(A) In General

    360k4.4 Powers Reserved to States

    360k4.4(2) k. Police power. Most

    Cited Cases

    Under federal system, states possess primary au-

    thority for defining and enforcing criminal law.

    [4] Commerce 83 82.50

    83 Commerce

    115 S.Ct. 1624 Page 1

    514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626, 63 USLW 4343, 99 Ed. Law Rep. 24

    (Cite as: 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0258156801&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0258156801&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0204863401&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=506&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1993177422http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1994053654http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0238463201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0243105201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0209675601&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0216654601&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0156277701&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0263202201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0254766801&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0156277701&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0263202201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0224420501&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k2http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k5http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=83k5http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k2http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k5http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=83k5http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k2http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k5http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=360http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=360Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=360I%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=360I%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=360k4.4http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=360k4.4%282%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=360k4.4%282%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=360k4.4%282%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=360k4.4%282%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=360k4.4%282%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=360k4.4%282%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=360k4.4http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=360I%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=360Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=360http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k2http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=83k5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k2http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=83k5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k2http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0224420501&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0263202201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0156277701&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0254766801&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0263202201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0156277701&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0216654601&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0209675601&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0243105201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0238463201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1994053654http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=506&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1993177422http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0204863401&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0258156801&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0258156801&FindType=h
  • 8/9/2019 U.S. vs. Lopez 115 S.Ct. 1624

    3/54

    83II Application to Particular Subjects and

    Methods of Regulation

    83II(K) Miscellaneous Subjects and Regula-

    tions

    83k82.50 k. Weapons and explosives.

    Most Cited Cases

    Weapons 406 106(4)

    406 Weapons

    406I In General

    406k102 Constitutional, Statutory, and Regu-

    latory Provisions

    406k106 Validity

    406k106(4) k. Violation of other rights

    or provisions. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 406k3)

    Gun-Free School Zones Act, which makes it federal

    offense for any individual knowingly to possess

    firearm in place that individual believes or has reas-

    onable cause to believe is school zone, exceeded

    Congress' commerce clause authority; Act was

    criminal statute that by its terms had nothing to do

    with commerce or any sort of economic enter-

    prise, however broadly defined; possession of gun

    in local school zone was not economic activity that

    might, through repetition elsewhere, substantially

    affect any sort of interstate commerce; and statutecontained no jurisdictional element to ensure,

    through case-by-case inquiry, that possession of

    firearm had any concrete tie to interstate commerce.

    U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 1, 8, cl. 3; 18 U.S.C.(1988

    Ed.) 922(q)(1)(A).

    [5] Commerce 83 5

    83 Commerce

    83I Power to Regulate in General

    83k2 Constitutional Grant of Power to Con-

    gress83k5 k. Commerce among the states.

    Most Cited Cases

    Congress normally is not required to make formal

    findings as to substantial burdens that activity has

    on interstate commerce to establish constitutional-

    ity of legislation under commerce clause. U.S.C.A.

    Const. Art. 1, 8, cl. 3.

    [6] Commerce 83 82.20

    83 Commerce83II Application to Particular Subjects and

    Methods of Regulation

    83II(K) Miscellaneous Subjects and Regula-

    tions

    83k82.20 k. Subjects and regulations in

    general. Most Cited Cases

    Congressional authority under commerce clause to

    regulate numerous commercial activities that sub-

    stantially affect interstate commerce and also affect

    educational process, though broad, does not include

    authority to regulate each and every aspect of local

    schools. U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 1, 8, cl. 3.

    West Codenotes

    Prior Version Held Unconstitutional18 U.S.C.A.

    922(q)(1)(A).

    **1625 *549 SyllabusFN*

    FN* The syllabus constitutes no part of the

    opinion of the Court but has been prepared

    by the Reporter of Decisions for the con-

    venience of the reader. See United States v.

    Detroit Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26

    S.Ct. 282, 287, 50 L.Ed. 499.

    After respondent, then a 12th-grade student, carried

    a concealed handgun into his high school, he was

    charged with violating the Gun-Free School Zones

    Act of 1990, which forbids any individual know-

    ingly to possess a firearm at a place that [he] knows

    ... is a school zone, 18 U.S.C. 922(q)(1)(A). The

    District Court denied his motion to dismiss the in-

    dictment, concluding that 922(q) is a constitution-

    al exercise of Congress' power to regulate activities

    in and affecting commerce. In reversing, the Court

    of Appeals held that, in light of what it character-

    ized as insufficient congressional findings and le-

    gislative history, 922(q) is invalid as beyond Con-

    gress' power under the Commerce Clause.

    Held: The Act exceeds Congress' Commerce

    115 S.Ct. 1624 Page 2

    514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626, 63 USLW 4343, 99 Ed. Law Rep. 24

    (Cite as: 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83IIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83II%28K%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83II%28K%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k82.50http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=83k82.50http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=406http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=406Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=406k102http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=406k102http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=406k106http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=406k106%284%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=406k106%284%29http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k2http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k5http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=83k5http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83IIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83II%28K%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83II%28K%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k82.20http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=83k82.20http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=83k82.20http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k82.20http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83II%28K%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83IIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=83k5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k2http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=406k106%284%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=406k106%284%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=406k106http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=406k102http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=406Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=406http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=83k82.50http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83k82.50http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83II%28K%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=83II
  • 8/9/2019 U.S. vs. Lopez 115 S.Ct. 1624

    4/54

    Clause authority. First, although this Court has up-

    held a wide variety of congressional Acts regulating

    intrastate economic activity that substantially af-

    fected interstate commerce, the possession of a gun

    in a local school zone is in no sense an economic

    activity that might, through repetition elsewhere,

    have such a substantial effect on interstate com-

    merce. Section 922(q) is a criminal statute that by

    its terms has nothing to do with commerce or any

    sort of economic enterprise, however broadly those

    terms are defined. Nor is it an essential part of a

    larger regulation of economic activity, in which the

    regulatory scheme could be undercut unless the in-

    trastate activity were regulated. It cannot, therefore,

    be sustained under the Court's cases upholding reg-

    ulations of activities that arise out of or are connec-ted with a commercial transaction, which, viewed

    in the aggregate, substantially affects interstate

    commerce. Second, 922(q) contains no jurisdic-

    tional element that would ensure, through case-

    by-case inquiry, that the firearms possession in

    question has the requisite nexus with interstate

    commerce. Respondent was a local student at a loc-

    al school; there is no indication that he had recently

    moved in interstate commerce, and there is no re-

    quirement that his possession of the firearm have

    any concrete tie to interstate commerce. To uphold

    the Government's contention that 922(q) is justi-

    fied because firearms possession in a local school

    zone does indeed substantially affect interstate

    commerce would require this Court to pile infer-

    ence upon inference in a manner that would bid fair

    to convert congressional Commerce Clause *550

    authority to a general police power of the sort held

    only by the States. Pp. 1626-1634.

    2 F.3d 1342, (CA5 1993), affirmed.

    REHNQUIST, C.J., delivered the opinion of the

    Court, in which O'CONNOR, SCALIA,

    KENNEDY, and THOMAS, JJ., joined.

    KENNEDY, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which

    O'CONNOR, J., joined, post, p. 1634. THOMAS,

    J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 1642.

    STEVENS, J., post, p. 1651, and SOUTER, J., post,

    p. 1651, filed dissenting opinions. BREYER, J.,

    filed a dissenting opinion, in which STEVENS,

    SOUTER, and GINSBURG, JJ., joined, post, p.

    1657.

    Drew S. Days, III, New Haven, CT, for petitioner.

    John R. Carter, Georgetown, TX, for respondent.

    For U.S. Supreme Court briefs, see:1994 WL

    242541 (Pet.Brief)1994 WL 396915

    (Resp.Brief)1994 WL 449691 (Reply.Brief)1994

    WL 534698 (Pet.Supp.Brief)

    **1626 *551 Chief Justice REHNQUIST delivered

    the opinion of the Court.

    In the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, Con-gress made it a federal offense for any individual

    knowingly to possess a firearm at a place that the

    individual knows, or has reasonable cause to be-

    lieve, is a school zone. 18 U.S.C. 922(q)(1)(A)

    (1988 ed., Supp. V). The Act neither regulates a

    commercial activity nor contains a requirement that

    the possession be connected in any way to interstate

    commerce. We hold that the Act exceeds the au-

    thority of Congress [t]o regulate Commerce ...

    among the several States.... U.S. Const., Art. I,

    8, cl. 3.

    On March 10, 1992, respondent, who was then a

    12th-grade student, arrived at Edison High School

    in San Antonio, Texas, carrying a concealed

    .38-caliber handgun and five bullets. Acting upon

    an anonymous tip, school authorities confronted re-

    spondent, who admitted that he was carrying the

    weapon. He was arrested and charged under Texas

    law with firearm possession on school premises.

    See Tex.Penal Code Ann. 46.03(a)(1)

    (Supp.1994). The next day, the state charges were

    dismissed after federal agents charged respondent

    by complaint with violating the Gun-Free School

    Zones Act of 1990. 18 U.S.C. 922(q)(1)(A) (1988

    ed., Supp. V).FN1

    FN1. The term school zone is defined as

    in, or on the grounds of, a public, parochi-

    115 S.Ct. 1624 Page 3

    514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626, 63 USLW 4343, 99 Ed. Law Rep. 24

    (Cite as: 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=506&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1993177422http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0238463201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0209675601&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0254763301&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0243105201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0216654601&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0243105201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0209675601&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0216654601&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0156277701&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0263202201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0254766801&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0156277701&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0263202201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0224420501&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0270223401&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0238463201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000182&DocName=TXPES46.03&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000182&DocName=TXPES46.03&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_285c0000a6020http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0238463201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0270223401&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0224420501&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0263202201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0156277701&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0254766801&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0263202201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0156277701&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0216654601&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0209675601&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0243105201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0216654601&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0243105201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0254763301&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0209675601&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=PROFILER-WLD&DocName=0238463201&FindType=hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=506&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1993177422http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341
  • 8/9/2019 U.S. vs. Lopez 115 S.Ct. 1624

    5/54

    al or private school or within a distance

    of 1,000 feet from the grounds of a public,

    parochial or private school. 921(a)(25).

    A federal grand jury indicted respondent on one

    count of knowing possession of a firearm at a

    school zone, in violation of 922(q). Respondent

    moved to dismiss his federal indictment on the

    ground that 922(q) is unconstitutional as it is

    beyond the power of Congress to legislate control

    over our public schools. The District Court denied

    the motion, concluding that 922(q) is a constitu-

    tional exercise of Congress' well-defined power to

    regulate activities in and affecting *552 commerce,

    and the business' of elementary, middle and high

    schools ... affects interstate commerce. App. toPet. for Cert. 55a. Respondent waived his right to a

    jury trial. The District Court conducted a bench tri-

    al, found him guilty of violating 922(q), and sen-

    tenced him to six months' imprisonment and two

    years' supervised release.

    On appeal, respondent challenged his conviction

    based on his claim that 922(q) exceeded Con-

    gress' power to legislate under the Commerce

    Clause. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

    agreed and reversed respondent's conviction. It held

    that, in light of what it characterized as insufficientcongressional findings and legislative history,

    section 922(q), in the full reach of its terms, is in-

    valid as beyond the power of Congress under the

    Commerce Clause. 2 F.3d 1342, 1367-1368 (1993)

    . Because of the importance of the issue, we granted

    certiorari, 511 U.S. 1029, 114 S.Ct. 1536, 128

    L.Ed.2d 189 (1994), and we now affirm.

    We start with first principles. The Constitution cre-

    ates a Federal Government of enumerated powers.

    See Art. I, 8. As James Madison wrote: The

    powers delegated by the proposed Constitution tothe federal government are few and defined. Those

    which are to remain in the State governments are

    numerous and indefinite. The Federalist No. 45,

    pp. 292-293 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961). This constitu-

    tionally mandated division of authority was adop-

    ted by the Framers to ensure protection of our fun-

    damental liberties. Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S.

    452, 458, 111 S.Ct. 2395, 2400, 115 L.Ed.2d 4 10

    (1991) (internal quotation marks omitted). Just as

    the separation and independence of the coordinate

    branches of the Federal Government serve to pre-

    vent the accumulation of excessive power in any

    one branch, a healthy balance of power between the

    States and the Federal Government will reduce the

    risk of tyranny and abuse from either front. Ibid.

    The Constitution delegates to Congress the power

    [t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and

    among the several States, and with the Indian

    Tribes. *553Art. I, 8, cl. 3. The Court, through

    Chief Justice Marshall, first defined the nature of

    Congress'**1627 commerce power in Gibbons v.Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 189-190, 6 L.Ed. 23 (1824):

    Commerce, undoubtedly, is traffic, but it is

    something more: it is intercourse. It describes the

    commercial intercourse between nations, and

    parts of nations, in all its branches, and is regu-

    lated by prescribing rules for carrying on that in-

    tercourse.

    The commerce power is the power to regulate; that

    is, to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be

    governed. This power, like all others vested in con-gress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its

    utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations,

    other than are prescribed in the constitution. Id., at

    196. The Gibbons Court, however, acknowledged

    that limitations on the commerce power are inher-

    ent in the very language of the Commerce Clause.

    It is not intended to say that these words com-

    prehend that commerce, which is completely in-

    ternal, which is carried on between man and man

    in a State, or between different parts of the same

    State, and which does not extend to or affect oth-

    er States. Such a power would be inconvenient,and is certainly unnecessary.

    Comprehensive as the word among is, it may

    very properly be restricted to that commerce

    which concerns more States than one.... The enu-

    meration presupposes something not enumerated;

    115 S.Ct. 1624 Page 4

    514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626, 63 USLW 4343, 99 Ed. Law Rep. 24

    (Cite as: 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=506&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1993177422&ReferencePosition=1367http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1994053654http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1994053654http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1991112179&ReferencePosition=2400http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1991112179&ReferencePosition=2400http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1991112179&ReferencePosition=2400http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1991112179&ReferencePosition=2400http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1991112179http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1800117190&ReferencePosition=189http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1800117190&ReferencePosition=189http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1800117190&ReferencePosition=189http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1800117190&ReferencePosition=189http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1800117190&ReferencePosition=189http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1800117190&ReferencePosition=189http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOARTIS8CL3&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1991112179http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1991112179&ReferencePosition=2400http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1991112179&ReferencePosition=2400http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1991112179&ReferencePosition=2400http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1991112179&ReferencePosition=2400http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1994053654http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1994053654http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=506&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1993177422&ReferencePosition=1367http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=18USCAS922&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_7f6e000041341
  • 8/9/2019 U.S. vs. Lopez 115 S.Ct. 1624

    6/54

    and that something, if we regard the language, or

    the subject of the sentence, must be the exclus-

    ively internal commerce of a State. Id., at

    194-195.

    For nearly a century thereafter, the Court's Com-

    merce Clause decisions dealt but rarely with the ex-

    tent of Congress' power, and almost entirely with

    the Commerce Clause as a limit on state legislation

    that discriminated against interstate commerce. See,

    e.g., Veazie v. Moor, 14 How. 568, 573-575, 14

    L.Ed. 545 (1853) (upholding a state-created steam-

    boat monopoly*554 because it involved regulation

    of wholly internal commerce); Kidd v. Pearson,

    128 U.S. 1, 17, 20-22, 9 S.Ct. 6, 9-10, 32 L.Ed. 346

    (1888) (upholding a state prohibition on the manu-facture of intoxicating liquor because the commerce

    power does not comprehend the purely internal

    domestic commerce of a State which is carried on

    between man and man within a State or between

    different parts of the same State); see also L.

    Tribe, American Constitutional Law 306 (2d ed.

    1988). Under this line of precedent, the Court held

    that certain categories of activity such as

    production, manufacturing, and mining were

    within the province of state governments, and thus

    were beyond the power of Congress under the

    Commerce Clause. See Wickard v. Filburn, 317U.S. 111, 121, 63 S.Ct. 82, 87, 87 L.Ed. 122 (1942)

    (describing development of Commerce Clause jur-

    isprudence).

    In 1887, Congress enacted the Interstate Commerce

    Act, 24 Stat. 379, and in 1890, Congress enacted

    the Sherman Antitrust Act, 26 Stat. 209, as

    amended, 15 U.S.C. 1 et seq. These laws ushered

    in a new era of federal regulation under the com-

    merce power. When cases involving these laws first

    reached this Court, we imported from our negative

    Commerce Clause cases the approach that Congress

    could not regulate activities such as production,

    manufacturing, and mining. See, e.g., United

    States v. E.C. Knight Co., 156 U.S. 1, 12, 15 S.Ct.

    249, 253-254, 39 L.Ed. 325 (1895) (Commerce

    succeeds to manufacture, and is not part of it);

    Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U.S. 238, 304, 56

    S.Ct. 855, 869, 80 L.Ed. 1160 (1936) (Mining

    brings the subject matter of commerce into exist-

    ence. Commerce disposes of it). Simultaneously,

    however, the Court held that, where the interstate

    and intrastate aspects of commerce were so mingled

    together that full regulation of interstate commerce

    required incidental regulation of intrastate com-

    merce, the Commerce Clause authorized such regu-

    lation. See, e.g., Shreveport Rate Cases, 234 U.S.

    342, 34 S.Ct. 833, 58 L.Ed. 1341 (1914).

    In A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States,

    295 U.S. 495, 550, 55 S.Ct. 837, 851-52, 79 L.Ed.

    1570 (1935), the Court struck down regulations that

    *555 fixed the hours and wages of individuals em-ployed by an intrastate business because the activ-

    ity being regulated related to interstate commerce

    only indirectly. In doing so, the Court characterized

    the distinction between **1628 direct and indirect

    effects of intrastate transactions upon interstate

    commerce as a fundamental one, essential to the

    maintenance of our constitutional system. Id., at

    548, 55 S.Ct., at 851. Activities that affected inter-

    state commerce directly were within Congress'

    power; activities that affected interstate commerce

    indirectly were beyond Congress' reach. Id., at 546,

    55 S.Ct., at 850. The justification for this formaldistinction was rooted in the fear that otherwise

    there would be virtually no limit to the federal

    power and for all practical purposes we should have

    a completely centralized government. Id., at 548,

    55 S.Ct., at 851.

    Two years later, in the watershed case of NLRB v.

    Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1, 57 S.Ct.

    615, 81 L.Ed. 893 (1937), the Court upheld the Na-

    tional Labor Relations Act against a Commerce

    Clause challenge, and in the process, departed from

    the distinction between direct and indirect ef-

    fects on interstate commerce. Id., at 36-38, 57

    S.Ct., at 623-624 (The question [of the scope of

    Congress' power] is necessarily one of degree).

    The Court held that intrastate activities that have

    such a close and substantial relation to interstate

    115 S.Ct. 1624 Page 5

    514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626, 63 USLW 4343, 99 Ed. Law Rep. 24

    (Cite as: 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1800107728&ReferencePosition=573http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1800107728&ReferencePosition=573http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1800107728&ReferencePosition=573http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1888180229&ReferencePosition=9http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1888180229&ReferencePosition=9http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1888180229&ReferencePosition=9http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=87http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=87http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=87http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=15USCAS1&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=15USCAS1&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1895143988&ReferencePosition=253http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1895143988&ReferencePosition=253http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1895143988&ReferencePosition=253http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1895143988&ReferencePosition=253http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1936122235&ReferencePosition=869http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1936122235&ReferencePosition=869http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1936122235&ReferencePosition=869http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1914100712http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1914100712http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1914100712http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=850http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=850http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=850http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1937123003http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1937123003http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1937123003http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1937123003http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=623http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=623http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=623http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=623http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=623http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=623http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1937123003http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1937123003http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1937123003http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1937123003http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=850http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=850http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=850http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1935123814&ReferencePosition=851http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1914100712http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1914100712http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1914100712http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1936122235&ReferencePosition=869http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1936122235&ReferencePosition=869http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1936122235&ReferencePosition=869http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1895143988&ReferencePosition=253http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1895143988&ReferencePosition=253http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1895143988&ReferencePosition=253http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1895143988&ReferencePosition=253http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=15USCAS1&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=15USCAS1&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=87http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=87http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=87http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1888180229&ReferencePosition=9http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1888180229&ReferencePosition=9http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1888180229&ReferencePosition=9http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1888180229&ReferencePosition=9http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1800107728&ReferencePosition=573http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1800107728&ReferencePosition=573http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1800107728&ReferencePosition=573http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1800117190
  • 8/9/2019 U.S. vs. Lopez 115 S.Ct. 1624

    7/54

    commerce that their control is essential or appropri-

    ate to protect that commerce from burdens and ob-

    structions are within Congress' power to regulate.

    Id., at 37, 57 S.Ct., at 624.

    In United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100, 61 S.Ct.

    451, 85 L.Ed. 609 (1941), the Court upheld the Fair

    Labor Standards Act, stating:

    The power of Congress over interstate com-

    merce is not confined to the regulation of com-

    merce among the states. It extends to those activ-

    ities intrastate which so affect interstate com-

    merce or the exercise of the power of Congress

    over it as to make regulation of them appropriate

    means to the attainment of a legitimate end, the

    exercise of the granted power of Congress to reg-

    ulate interstate commerce. Id., at 118, 61 S.Ct.,

    at 459.

    *556 See also United States v. Wrightwood Dairy

    Co., 315 U.S. 110, 119, 62 S.Ct. 523, 526, 86 L.Ed.

    726 (1942) (the commerce power extends to those

    intrastate activities which in a substantial way inter-

    fere with or obstruct the exercise of the granted

    power).

    In Wickard v. Filburn, the Court upheld the applic-

    ation of amendments to the Agricultural Adjust-

    ment Act of 1938 to the production and consump-

    tion of homegrown wheat. 317 U.S., at 128-129, 63

    S.Ct., at 90-91. The Wickard Court explicitly rejec-

    ted earlier distinctions between direct and indirect

    effects on interstate commerce, stating:

    [E]ven if appellee's activity be local and though

    it may not be regarded as commerce, it may still,

    whatever its nature, be reached by Congress if it

    exerts a substantial economic effect on interstate

    commerce, and this irrespective of whether such

    effect is what might at some earlier time have

    been defined as direct or indirect. Id., at

    125, 63 S.Ct., at 89.

    The Wickard Court emphasized that although Fil-

    burn's own contribution to the demand for wheat

    may have been trivial by itself, that was not

    enough to remove him from the scope of federal

    regulation where, as here, his contribution, taken

    together with that of many others similarly situated,

    is far from trivial. Id., at 127-128, 63 S.Ct., at

    90-91.

    Jones & Laughlin Steel, Darby, and Wickard

    ushered in an era of Commerce Clause jurispru-

    dence that greatly expanded the previously defined

    authority of Congress under that Clause. In part,

    this was a recognition of the great changes that had

    occurred in the way business was carried on in this

    country. Enterprises that had once been local or at

    most regional in nature had become national in

    scope. But the doctrinal change also reflected aview that earlier Commerce Clause cases artifi-

    cially had constrained the authority of Congress to

    regulate interstate commerce.

    But even these modern-era precedents which have

    expanded congressional power under the Com-

    merce Clause *557 confirm that this power is sub-

    ject to outer limits. In Jones & Laughlin Steel, the

    Court warned that the scope of the interstate com-

    merce power must be considered in the light of our

    dual system of government and may not be exten-

    ded so as to embrace effects upon interstate com-merce so indirect and remote that **1629 to em-

    brace them, in view of our complex society, would

    effectually obliterate the distinction between what

    is national and what is local and create a com-

    pletely centralized government. 301 U.S., at 37, 57

    S.Ct., at 624; see also Darby, supra, 312 U.S., at

    119-120, 61 S.Ct., at 459-460 (Congress may regu-

    late intrastate activity that has a substantial effect

    on interstate commerce); Wickard, supra, at 125, 63

    S.Ct., at 89 (Congress may regulate activity that

    exerts a substantial economic effect on interstate

    commerce). Since that time, the Court has heeded

    that warning and undertaken to decide whether a ra-

    tional basis existed for concluding that a regulated

    activity sufficiently affected interstate commerce.

    See, e.g., Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Re-

    clamation Assn., Inc., 452 U.S. 264, 276-280, 101

    115 S.Ct. 1624 Page 6

    514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626, 63 USLW 4343, 99 Ed. Law Rep. 24

    (Cite as: 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=624http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=624http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1941123321http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1941123321http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1941123321http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1941123321&ReferencePosition=459http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1941123321&ReferencePosition=459http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1941123321&ReferencePosition=459http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121599&ReferencePosition=526http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121599&ReferencePosition=526http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121599&ReferencePosition=526http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121599&ReferencePosition=526http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1942121823http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=90http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=90http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1942121823http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=89http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=89http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=89http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1942121823http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=90http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=90http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=90http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1937123003http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1941123321http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1942121823http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1937123003http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=624http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=624http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1941123321&ReferencePosition=459http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1941123321&ReferencePosition=459http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1941123321&ReferencePosition=459http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=89http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=89http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=89http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1981126305&ReferencePosition=2360http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1981126305&ReferencePosition=2360http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1981126305&ReferencePosition=2360http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1981126305&ReferencePosition=2360http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=89http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=89http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=89http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1941123321&ReferencePosition=459http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1941123321&ReferencePosition=459http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1941123321&ReferencePosition=459http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=624http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=624http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1937123003http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1942121823http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1941123321http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1937123003http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=90http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=90http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=90http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1942121823http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=89http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=89http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=89http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1942121823http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=90http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121823&ReferencePosition=90http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1942121823http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121599&ReferencePosition=526http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121599&ReferencePosition=526http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121599&ReferencePosition=526http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1942121599&ReferencePosition=526http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1941123321&ReferencePosition=459http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1941123321&ReferencePosition=459http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1941123321&ReferencePosition=459http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1941123321http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1941123321http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1941123321http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=624http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1937123003&ReferencePosition=624
  • 8/9/2019 U.S. vs. Lopez 115 S.Ct. 1624

    8/54

    S.Ct. 2352, 2360-2361, 69 L.Ed.2d 1 (1981); Perez

    v. United States, 402 U.S. 146, 155-156, 91 S.Ct.

    1357, 1362, 28 L.Ed.2d 686 (1971); Katzenbach v.

    McClung, 379 U.S. 294, 299-301, 85 S.Ct. 377,

    381-382, 13 L.Ed.2d 290 (1964); Heart of Atlanta

    Motel, Inc. v. United States, 379 U.S. 241, 252-253,

    85 S.Ct. 348, 354-355, 13 L.Ed.2d 258 (1964).FN2

    FN2. See also Hodel, 452 U.S., at 311, 101

    S.Ct., at 2391 ([S]imply because Con-

    gress may conclude that a particular activ-

    ity substantially affects interstate com-

    merce does not necessarily make it so)

    (REHNQUIST, J., concurring in judg-

    ment); Heart of Atlanta Motel, 379 U.S., at

    273, 85 S.Ct., at 366 ([W]hether particu-lar operations affect interstate commerce

    sufficiently to come under the constitution-

    al power of Congress to regulate them is

    ultimately a judicial rather than a legislat-

    ive question, and can be settled finally

    only by this Court) (Black, J., concur-

    ring).

    Similarly, in Maryland v. Wirtz, 392 U.S. 183, 88

    S.Ct. 2017, 20 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1968), the Court reaf-

    firmed that the power to regulate commerce,

    though broad indeed, has limits that [t]he Courthas ample power to enforce. Id., at 196, 88 S.Ct.,

    at 2023-2024, overruled on other grounds, National

    League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833, 96 S.Ct.

    2465, 49 L.Ed.2d 245 (1976), overruled by *558

    Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Au-

    thority, 469 U.S. 528, 105 S.Ct. 1005, 83 L.Ed.2d

    1016 (1985). In response to the dissent's warnings

    that the Court was powerless to enforce the limita-

    tions on Congress' commerce powers because [a]ll

    activities affecting commerce, even in the minutest

    degree, [Wickard], may be regulated and controlled

    by Congress, 392 U.S., at 204, 88 S.Ct., at 20 28

    (Douglas, J., dissenting), the Wirtz Court replied

    that the dissent had misread precedent as [n]either

    here nor in Wickard has the Court declared that

    Congress may use a relatively trivial impact on

    commerce as an excuse for broad general regulation

    of state or private activities, id., at 197, n. 27, 63

    S.Ct., at 89-90, n. 27. Rather, [t]he Court has said

    only that where a general regulatory statute bears

    a substantial relation to commerce, the de minimis

    character of individual instances arising under that

    statute is of no consequence. Ibid. (first emphasis

    added).

    Consistent with this structure, we have identified

    three broad categories of activity that Congress may

    regulate under its commerce power. Perez, supra,

    at 150, 91 S.Ct., at 1359; see also Hodel, supra, at

    276-277, 101 S.Ct., at 2360-2361. First, Congress

    may regulate the use of the channels of interstate

    commerce. See, e.g., Darby, 312 U.S., at 114, 61

    S.Ct., at 457; Heart of Atlanta Motel, supra, at 256,85 S.Ct., at 357 ( [T]he authority of Congress to

    keep the channels of interstate commerce free from

    immoral and injurious uses has been frequently sus-

    tained, and is no longer open to question.

    (quoting Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470,

    491, 37 S.Ct. 192, 197, 61 L.Ed. 442 (1917))).

    Second, Congress is empowered to regulate and

    protect the instrumentalities of interstate commerce,

    or persons or things in interstate commerce, even

    though the threat may come only from intrastate

    activities. See, e.g., Shreveport Rate Cases, 234

    U.S. 342, 34 S.Ct. 833, 58 L.Ed. 1341 (1914);Southern R. Co. v. United States, 222 U.S. 20, 32

    S.Ct. 2, 56 L.Ed. 72 (1911) (upholding amendments

    to Safety Appliance Act as applied to vehicles used

    in intrastate commerce); Perez, supra, at 150, 91

    S.Ct., at 1359 ([F]or example, the destruction of

    an aircraft (18 U.S.C. 32), or ... thefts from inter-

    state shipments (18 U.S.C. 659)). Finally, Con-

    gress' commerce authority includes the power to

    regulate those activities*559 having a substantial

    **1630 relation to interstate commerce, Jones &

    Laughlin Steel, 301 U.S., at 37, 57 S.Ct., at 624,

    i.e., those activities that substantially affect inter-

    state commerce, Wirtz, supra, at 196, n. 27, 88

    S.Ct., at 2024, n. 27.

    [1] Within this final category, admittedly, our case

    law has not been clear whether an activity must

    115 S.Ct. 1624 Page 7

    514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626, 63 USLW 4343, 99 Ed. Law Rep. 24

    (Cite as: 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1981126305&ReferencePosition=2360http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1971127059&ReferencePosition=1362http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1971127059&ReferencePosition=1362http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1971127059&ReferencePosition=1362http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1971127059&ReferencePosition=1362http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1964133016&ReferencePosition=381http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1964133016&ReferencePosition=381http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1964133016&ReferencePosition=381http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1964133016&ReferencePosition=381http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1964124896&ReferencePosition=354http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1964124896&ReferencePosition=354http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1964124896&ReferencePosition=354http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1964124896&ReferencePosition=354http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1981126305&ReferencePosition=2391http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1981126305&ReferencePosition=2391http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1981126305&ReferencePosition=2391http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1964124896&ReferencePosition=366http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1964124896&ReferencePosition=366http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1964124896&ReferencePosition=366http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1968131225http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1968131225http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1968131225http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1968131225&ReferencePosition=2023http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1968131225&ReferencePosition=2023http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1968131225&ReferencePosition=2023http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1976142422http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1976142422http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1976142422http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1976142422http://www.westlaw.com/Fin