use of a small unpiloted aerial vehicle for remote sensing in the arctic – potential and...

29
Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, [email protected] Rationale for UAVs The “Aerosonde” UAV Barrow Operations Results

Post on 15-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations

Jim Maslanik, [email protected]

• Rationale for UAVs

• The “Aerosonde” UAV

• Barrow Operations

• Results

Page 2: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

• surface characterization / time-space variations

• ice-atmosphere interactions

• ocean temperatures – local/regional variations, forcings

• polar clouds and radiation

• satellite product validation

• coastal processes (erosion, productivity, currents)

• wildlife studies

• vegetation / lake studies

• search and rescue

• …

Potential Research/Application Areas

Page 3: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Aircraft Support Issues for Polar Research

• research-grade aircraft

• easily deployable with less long-range planning needed

• ability to stay on site for long periods

• low cost

• minimum hassle

• basic instrument suite

• long range/duration

• multiple aircraft

• …

Page 4: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Why UAVs?

Considerations:• safety• access• operating conditions• logistics and cost

Page 5: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

• access

• local impacts

Why UAVs?

Page 6: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

The Aerosondetm Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle

Design philosophy:

• fully robotic

•low cost per plane (approx. $50,000)

• low/moderate operations/logistics costs

• long range/flight duration

• small but effective payload capacity

• flexible communications/operations modes

Page 7: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

• Relatively low cost

• Ease of deployment

• Global sat-comm operation

•Range and multi-plane capabilities

Advantages/Disadvantages of the Aerosonde

• payload restrictions

• no “see and avoid”

Page 8: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Manufactured and operated by Aerosonde, Ltd., Melbourne

(www.aerosonde.com)

Instrument Payloads:• air temp., RH, wind speed and direction• digital camera (800 image capacity)• infrared pyrometer (skin temps., cloud top temps.)• video (visual and thermal: long-range transmission)• icing sensor• imaging radar, profiling laser, pyranometers, cloud particle sampler•ozone sampler, profiling spectrometer, turbulent flux measurements

Page 9: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Multi-Plane / Long-Duration Mission Configurations

• aircraft at multiple altitudes

• two planes flying in tandem

• tag-team missions

Page 10: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Profiles

Lead Mission: 29 March 2003

Survey Legs

Mission Planning and Control

Page 11: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Barrow-Based Operating Area

Page 12: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Engineering accomplishments for operations in cold regions

• Oil heating• Icing sensor for avoidance• Insulate electronics• Replace carburetor with fuel injection system• Strengthened airframe to withstand icing

Page 13: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale
Page 14: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Limitations:

• airframe icing

• availability and maintenance of launch/landing areas

• payload/power restrictions

• availability and scheduling

• cost

• local impacts

• FAA restrictions

Page 15: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Research Examples (Barrow Missions)

Page 16: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale
Page 17: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale
Page 18: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

[email protected]@colorado.edu

www.aerosonde.comwww.aerosonde.com

[email protected]@eas.gatech.edu

[email protected]@aerosonde.com

Page 19: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Ice-Atmosphere Processes

Page 20: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

air temperature skin

temperature

wind direction

Lead Processes and Surface Temperature Studies

Page 21: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Mesoscale variability caused by open water

upwind

downwind

Page 22: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Sea Surface Temperature Studies

Page 23: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

4am ADT, Tuesday, July 29

Winds: West-southwest at 38 mph, Gust of 49 mph, Temperature: 47°F

L

Improving Weather Forecasts

Page 24: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale
Page 25: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Shoreline/Vegetation Mapping

Surface Characterization

Page 26: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Potential Contribution to Other Programs

• SEARCH

• RIME

• EOS / NPOESS

• PARCA

• Int. Polar Year

• …

Page 28: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

Questions?

Page 29: Use of a Small Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing in the Arctic – Potential and Limitations Jim Maslanik, James.maslanik@colorado.edu Rationale

#1. FAA flight restrictions

• FAA limits flight operations to outside 12 miles from shore

• FAA requires visual-flight-rule (VFR) conditions for take-off (Aerosondes are capable of operating under IFR conditions)

• increased FAA flexibility, clearly-defined FAA technology requirements for UAVs, new flight monitoring technology (e.g., “Capstone” program)

#2. Airframe icing

• detect and avoid icing conditions through onboard instrumentation and mission planning

• anti-icing engineering

#3. Cross-winds

• presently limited to east-west launch tracks

• launch procedure mods.

• additional launch area

Major (Barrow Area) Limiting Factors / Solution Options