Foucault tells us that ~

We are far indeed from A

For Foucault,

It is surprising that ~

Foucault account in book's name

His analysis as a whole reproduces that

~

In what follows, I shall examine ~

I consider three categories of such ~

I shall probe ~

In the final section, I shall argue

All the A we have described so far are

~

We have examined some of ~

In a language of ~

Are we dealing in all this merely with

A?

Both are aiming at the same general

result.

We are often told that ~

There is some truth in A.

Here it might be objected that ~

First, Second, Third, Lastly(Finally)

As I argued earlier,

It is true that ~

What is announced in A

Foucault tends to identify A

Now,

This is not to deny that ~

What I wish to suggest instead is that

~

As noted earlier,

I have described elsewhere how ~

This, then, is one meaning of A

This is a second sense of A

There is a certain contradiction here.

beyond this, it calls into question that

~

If my analysis is correct,

If, as I have argued, ~

By contrast,

In important ways,

It is presented to us in ways that ~

Foucault often writes

Peter accuses Foucault of lacking a

theory of A

Nor should we forget that ~

I will argue ~

What I need to ask of why ~

We need to ~

I will call those stream as ~

I agree with A

I take ~

For that reason,

throughout my discussion

This is not to say that ~

Nowhere, as we shall see, is this more

clear than in the case of A.

This is what many anorexics describe

as their ultimate goal.

It is not usually noted that ~

A hundred pages earlier, she had

described ~

We should feel cautioned against ~

Surely we must recognize in this last ~

None of this is to dispute that ~

There is the same emphasis on ~

Most strikingly, there is the same

emphasis on ~

Hilde reports that ~

What is the meaning of these ~?

It was an era, too, that ~

Freud, who~

Paradoxically,

It is important to recognize, too, that ~

Let's explore this image.

It is important to emphasize that ~

A, on the other hand, ~