using 3d laser profilers and imus to measure road geometryproceedings.esri.com › library ›...
TRANSCRIPT
-
PavemetricsVision Technology for Inspection of Transportation Infrastructures
2016 ESRI – UC
LaserDigitalTerrainMapping (LDTM)
Benoit Petitclerc, P. Eng.John Laurent, P. Eng.Éric Samson
PAVEMETRICS Systems Inc.
150 Boulevard René-Lévesque Est, Suite 1820Québec, Québec, CANADAG1R 5B1
www.pavemetrics.com
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM – Overview
System that produces a 3D representation in the space of a scanned surface to calculate or measure:
2
• Break lines and detect lane markings,
• Road edges,
• Curbs,
• Dropoff of unpaved shoulders,
• Road profile,
• Curvature,
• Slope and crossfall (super elevation)
• Etc.
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM components - LCMS
100km/h scanning speed
Surface geometry measurement
Full 3D model of surface
Day or night operation
High-resolution image of surface
1mm x resolutionLCMS-1 : 5mm y resolutionLCMS-2 : 1mm y resolution at 100km/h0.5 mm z resolution
Automated data processing
LCMS-1 : 11200 profiles per secondLCMS-2 : 28000 profiles per second4160 points per profile (4m FOV) 3
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics
Line Laser
Camera
Measurement principle
LCMS Sensor
Road/Runway/Tunnel/Rail Surface
Range
Successive Scans are Compiled to Form a Continuous Image
DZ
4
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics Understanding 3D Imaging
5
Range Intensity3D
-
PavemetricsPavemetricsExample of results without
compensation
6
The profiles are aligned in strait line one after the other and elevation varies according to movement of the
suspension
Example: U-turn and curb jump
-
PavemetricsPavemetricsLDTM Components for compensation
LDTM solutions:
1 –• Optical encoder (DMI)
• Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) x 2
2 –• Optical encoder (DMI)
• Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) x 2
• GNSS (Rover / Base station)
Or
Commercial inertial navigation system
7
Milepoint: 156.4Z, Y, Z: 46.81, -71.21, 47.12Pitch, Roll Heading: 2%, 5%, 3 DegreesLane Width: 3.5m
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM components
Inertial Measurement Units
8
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics
High Dynamic test
• Curbside jump
• U-turn9
Example of compensation
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics
IMUs compensate for short wave length and GNSS for the long one wave length
10
Example of compensation
IMUs and GNSS compensation
Elevation compensated
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics
Wandering driver test- Compensating for highly dynamic vehicle movement
Before After
Example of compensation
11
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM -Typical configurations
1. Stand alone mode Pure inertial using IMUs only
2. Stand alone mixed with a GNSS GNSS is necessary for absolute data position1 and to compensate the
IMU’s drift over time
3. Coupled with a commercial Inertial solution2
12
1 : If no ground truth used2 : All the results in that presentation are based on that configuration
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM - Usage
13
Evaluation of the geometry and the surface characteristics of transportation infrastructures (Road, Rail, runway, tunnel)
Machinery control on construction site
Ref.: http://www.forconstructionpros.com/article/12067870
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics Usage example
14
Road Rehabilitation
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics Road Rehabilitation
15
Manual Road
Surveying
GPS/Laser Controlled
Milling
GPS/Laser Controlled
Paver
Engineering CAD Tool
Ref.: http://construction.trimble.com/ Ref.: Bentley Microstation InRoads ™
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics Road Rehabilitation
16
GPS/Laser Controlled
Milling
GPS/Laser Controlled
Paver
Engineering CAD Tool
LDTM Road Surveying (100km/h)
Ref.: http://construction.trimble.com/ Ref.: Bentley Microstation InRoads ™
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM – Closing the Loop
3D Road Data Collection
Data Processing
Road Condition and Geometry
PMS
Civil engineering 3D road design
and infrastructure software
New Road
17
PriorityProject List
Road Maintenance
Road Design
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM – Closing the Loop
3D Road Data Collection
Data Processing
Road Condition and Geometry
PMS
Civil engineering 3D road design
and infrastructure software
Rehabilitated Road
18
PriorityProject List
Road Maintenance
Road Design
LDTM’s DataLoop
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM Benefits
Build a better surface• Achieve maximum smoothness• Remove road waves and high & low spots• Ideal for projects such as highways, airports and large commercial surfaces
Reduce use of expensive material• Pave within a tighter tolerance and get closer to the minimal asphalt
thickness specification
Improve productivity• Reduce surveying costs• Faster completion
Every millimeter saved reduces milling and paving costs substantially
19
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics
As Designed• 1 mile long (5,280 feet)• 2 lanes; total width of 28
feet• 3” asphalt (76mm)• Asphalt @ $75/ton= 2,772 tons required at a cost of $207,900
As Built• 1 mile long (5,280 feet)• 2 lanes; total width of 28
feet• 3.157” asphalt (80mm)• Asphalt @ $75/ton= 2,917 tons (+145) required at a cost of $218,775
20
Millimeters Matter
Just 4mm extra asphalt on 1 mile…+$10,875 in material costs
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics Millimeters Matter
“Concrete pavements constructed 10% less than their design thickness will reduce its life cycle by 90%”
Jim Ollis, National Survey Standard for Road and Bridge Construction in Australia and New Zealand
21
-
PavemetricsPavemetricsLDTM vs Mobile Mapping and
Manual Survey
22
1 - LDTM coupled with an Inertial system2 - Industry accepted specification values3 - Obstruction caused by objects in the field of view (ex: cars, people, trees, etc.)4- Réf.: Accuracy evaluation of a mobile mapping system with advanced statistical methods (2015)
I. Toschi , P. Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, F. Remondino, S. Minto, S. Orlandini, A. Fuller
Manual Survey LDTM1 Mobile Mapping2
Sampling rate 15 points / hour 45 Mpixels / sec. 1 Mega pixels / sec.Field of view 100 m 4 m 360 degreesPosition accuracy 3 mm 4 mm 8 to 10 mm4
Obstruction by object3 None None Yes
LDTM collects 45 Mega pixels per second over a 4m lane with the accuracy achieved by a
professional surveyor.
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM
23
Accuracy and precision
Ref.: http://www.extremetech.com/
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM validation - Test Track
24
Local Québec Test Site
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM Test Track
25
Test Site Characteristics
• Allow for testing LDTM in multiple road geometry scenarios and different collection speeds- 700m straight road
- Soft curves
- Sharp turns
- Various Loops : 2.2km, 1.7km, 1.2km and dead end (200m)
- Elevation changes (approximately 2 º slope )
- More the 500 ref. points=> surveyed 3 time with total station
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM Test Track
26
Targets used-
• Target Type- 10cm diameter disc with overlaid cross.(cont’d)
- Cross: Easy identification of the disc center for surveying
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics
Test Site : Surveyed markers
LDTM Test Track
27
Markers group
-
PavemetricsPavemetricsAccuracy assessment of the
ground truth
Accuracy (mm): X: 2.8 Y: 3.0 Z: 2.0 Precision (mm): X: 0.8 Y: 0.1 Z: 0.1
28
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
RMS Error (mm)
Markers group
“Marker Group” comparison of Survey 1 and 2
X Y Z
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM – Accuracy assessment
Method:
For a certain distance (300 and 825 meters)
Best fit between GT and LDTM clicked reference points
29
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics
Accuracy compare to GT (Avg. in mm): X: 5.0 Y: 4.0 Z: 2.5 Repeatability compare to first scan (mm)*: X: 3.0 Y: 5.0 Z: 2.0
30
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Average RM
S Error (mm)
Run
Multiple runs ‐ Average error compare to GT
X Y Z
Best fit « Detected Markers »vs Ground Truth –300m
*Mean of RMS Error over 11 scans
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics
31
Accuracy compare to GT(Avg. in mm): X: 9.0 Y: 7.0 Z: 5.0 Repeatability compare to first scan (mm)* : X: 6.0 Y: 6.0 Z: 4.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Average RM
S Error (mm)
Run
Multiple runs ‐ Average error compare to GT
X Y Z
Best fit « Detected Markers » vs Ground Truth – 825m
*Mean of RMS Error over 11 scans
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM elevation repeatability
Elevation measured between 2 reference points separated by approx. 3.5m transversally
32
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM elevation repeatability
33
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
Delta elevation per siteLDTM with commercial inertial system
Delta_LDTM Delta_GT
Average GT-LDTM (m): 0.00183Standard deviation (m): 0.001563
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics
34
1 - LDTM coupled with an Inertial system2 - Industry accepted specification values3 - Obstruction caused by objects in the field of view (ex: cars, people, trees, etc.)4- Réf.: Accuracy evaluation of a mobile mapping system with advanced statistical methods (2015)
I. Toschi , P. Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, F. Remondino, S. Minto, S. Orlandini, A. Fuller
Manual Survey LDTM1 Mobile Mapping2
Sampling rate 15 points / hour 45 Mpixels / sec. 1 Mega pixels / sec.Field of view 100 m 4 m 360 degreesPosition accuracy 3 mm 4 mm 8 to 10 mm4
Obstruction by object3 None None Yes
LDTM collects 45 Mega pixels per second over a 4m lane with the accuracy achieved by a
professional surveyor.
LDTM - Conclusion
-
PavemetricsPavemetrics LDTM - Conclusions
• Reduce significantly the number of reference point to be measured manually (ground truth)
• System as accurate as traditional surveying methods
• Possibility to stitch many runs to produce multi lane 3D models (highways, runways, tunnels wall, etc.)
• Fast and highly accurate solution to produce data for automatic measures of geometry and infrastructure’s surface characteristics
35