using big data to predict organizational commitment
TRANSCRIPT
Using Big Data to Predict Organizational Commitment
Rajiv B. DeoB.Tech. M.Tech. C.I.S.A.
© Rajiv B Deo 20152
References W. Tantisiriroj, S. Patil, G. Gibson. “Data-intensive file
systems for Internet services: A rose by any other name ...” Technical Report CMUPDL-08-114, Parallel Data Laboratory, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, October 2008
Ramesh R. Sarukkai, Link Prediction and Path Analysis Using Markov Chains, Yahoo Inc, 2000
Stefan Wegenkittl, Modeling with Markov chains http://crypto.mat.sbg.ac.at/~ste/diss/node1.html, May 1998
M.C. Paulk et al., eds., The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process, Addison Wesley Longman, Reading, Mass., 1995
Billy E. Gillett, Introduction to Operations Research, TMH Edition 1979
Frederick S. Hillier and Gerald J. Lieberman, Introduction to Operations Research, Holden-Day Inc 1973
W.Feller, Introduction to Probability Theory & It’s applications, Vol 1 & 2, Wiley, 1971
© Rajiv B Deo 20153
The success of any business depends heavily on meeting the customer requirements in terms of quality, cost and functionality on or before the agreed dead line.
This is achieved by ensuring a very high level of commitment among all the sub groups activities
“commitment” is nothing but keeping the promises made with each interface represented by a sub group
Organizational Commitment - I
© Rajiv B Deo 20154
Organizational Commitment - II Quality model based on Capability Maturity
concept developed by SEI is built on the management commitment and involvement at each stage for meeting goals of every KPA
Thus, there is a need to continuously monitor and predict organization commitment level in every organization aiming at “Optimizing” level of SEI CMM. Over a period this level needs to improve.
In this presentation, we shall take a brief look at a quantitative model conceptualized and developed by the author to predict level of organization wide commitment.
© Rajiv B Deo 20155
Organization commitment model
Request for commitment is made by the service user agent
Scope of the request is frozen & Risk + Impact analysis is done by the service provider agent
Commitment given to the user agent - the date of expected fulfillment
Commitments
Commitments tracked to closure
Organization commitment model described here is best represented by a network diagram (PERT chart) where each arm in the critical path is represented by a two party commitment transaction involving a user agent and a service agent. The actual process between user and service agents is described below:-
© Rajiv B Deo 20156
Commitment Agents & their Interfaces
Senior Management
Business Development
Software Delivery
Infra-structure
Quality & Software Engineering
SQ Audit performanceTeam Performance- Schedule- CostsDuration of team meetings
# Proposals# Orders# Customers# New Customers
Audit PerformanceSLA performance- Installation- Problem solving- H/W S/W Purchase
# Processes introduced / modified / improved- Process Compliance Index
Customers
Project Management
Training Management
Resource Management
Human Resource Management
© Rajiv B Deo 20157
Network Diagram for predicting Organizational Commitment Level
CUSTOMER
Business DevelopmentGroup
Software Delivery Group
Project Management Group
Quality Group
Human Resources Group
Resource Management Group
Training Group
Infra-structure Group
© Rajiv B Deo 20158
Statistical Techniques - 1 Design of experiments technique is used to
identify unique independent factors which influence the predictability of the commitment transaction.
Delivery, Quality, and Cost of each project depends on commitment from - Senior Management Quality Management Project Management Training Management Resource Management Help Desk & Infrastructure Management Hardware & Technology Procurement Management Human Resource Management Business Development
© Rajiv B Deo 20159
Statistical Techniques - 2 The predictive model for organizational commitment
level is dependent on the current state and is completely independent of the previous states of the system.
The Organizational Commitment Model as seen by the customer is represented as a first order, finite state Markov chain consisting of two channels viz.Main channel
Marketing - Pre-sales – Project Management – Implementation
Supporting channelResources, Training, HR, Quality, Senior
Management, Infrastructure
© Rajiv B Deo 201510
Statistical Techniques - 3Transition probability from stage I to
stage J is worked out using pij(s) = P(X(t+s) = j | X(t) = i)
where, X is the Markov property derived from the performance of respective commitment agents on the critical path of the organizational network diagram.
© Rajiv B Deo 201511
Statistical Techniques - 4Organization Commitment level is
predicted with a certain level of confidence from a stochastic process consisting of collection of OCi{i = 1,2, …. n} where in, each OCi has a specific probability distribution function.
12
Degrees of Freedom – Commitment Agents
SM QM PM TM RM IT HP HR BD
7 7 7 6 6 5 4 6 2
SM 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1
QM 5 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0
PM 7 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0
TM 5 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0
RM 7 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
IT 6 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
HP 4 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0
HR 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1
BD 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
13
Commitment Agents Table part IAgent
Description Mechanism Interfaces Degrees of Freedom
Weight age (Wagent)
SM Senior Management
Senior Management decision making and reviews
Customers, Software Delivery, Quality, Infrastructure, Business Development, Human Resources
12 0.2857
QM Quality Management
Audit Performance
Software Delivery, Hardware & Technology procurement, Help Desk Support, Business Development,Project Management, Resource Management, Training Management, Human Resource Management
12 0.0714
PM Project Management
Project Planning, review, and Tracking
Software Delivery, Resource Management, Training Management
14 0.1429
TM Training Management
Inter Group Coordination
Project Management, Resource Management, Infrastructure, Quality, Human Resource Management
11 0.0714
14
Commitment Agents Table part IIAgent
Description Mechanism Interfaces Degrees of Freedom
Weight age (Wagent)
RM Resource Management
Inter Group Coordination
Human Resources, Project Management
13 0.0714
IT Help Desk & Infrastructure Management
SLA Performance Project Management 11 0.0714
HP Hardware & Technology Procurement Management
SLA Performance Project Management 8 0.0714
HR Human Resource Management
SLA Performance Software Delivery, Quality, Infrastructure
13 0.1429
BD Business Development
Business Targets Software Delivery 6 0.0714
© Rajiv B Deo 201515
Using Prediction Model in practice - I To find out what would be the organizational
commitment level in the month of August, you would look at the predicted value of OC8 of 9 service providers mentioned in the network diagram.
Organization commitment level for August 2016 would be 1. OC8 = WSM*OC8SM + WQM*OC8QM +
WPM*OC8PM 2. OC8 = OC8 + WTM*OC8TM + WRM* OC8RM 3. OC8 = OC8 + WITOC8IT + WRD* OC8BD
4. OC8 = OC8 + WHP*OC8HP + WHR* OC8HR
© Rajiv B Deo 201516
Using Prediction Model in practice - II After the organization commitment level for a
month is predicted using the stochastic process model, we test the hypothesis that the organizational commitment would be at the predicted value with 95% level of confidence using Chi square test. If the test fails we repeat the exercise for a lower level of confidence till the test succeeds.
The predicted service provider component’s level from the model is used by the concerned service providers to give realistic commitments, there by ensuring better predictability and greater customer satisfaction.
© Rajiv B Deo 201517
SummaryThe predictive model defined here,
was implemented using Hadoop with R and beta tested at many global organizations from 2008 to 2014
Live raw data captured from Unicenter, Remedy, SAP modules.
The leading indicators from the model have ensured higher levels of organizational commitment
© Rajiv B Deo 201518
Scope for further work The predictive data analytical model can
evaluate dynamic business scenarios including organization re-structuring as the degrees of freedom between the service agents change resulting in a different levels of organization commitment.
A real time Management Dashboard driven by business simulation of different organizational strategies can boost the organization wide commitment level as seen by the customer.