using & interpreting the single decrement life table
DESCRIPTION
Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table. Examples. Plan. Review Period Life Table Construction Ways of using the life table The life table as a Stationary Population Examples Life tables from South Africa Life tables from Zambia Life tables from the USA. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Samuel Clark
Department of Sociology, University of WashingtonInstitute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado at Boulder
Agincourt Health and Population Unit, University of the Witwatersrand
Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table
Examples
![Page 2: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Plan
Review Period Life Table Construction Ways of using the life table The life table as a Stationary Population Examples
– Life tables from South Africa– Life tables from Zambia– Life tables from the USA
![Page 3: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Creating a Period Life Table
The data available are usually observed age-specific mortality rates, nMx
Critical assumption is that nMx~ nmx
The trick then is to convert these observed age-specific mortality rates into one of the columns of a life table
The most convenient choice is to convert to nqx
nMx to nqx conversion:
1
n xn x
n x n x
n mq
n a m
![Page 4: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Strategies for Choosing nax
nmx nqx requires nax … where do we get nax ?
From calculating it directly From smoothing (graduating) the death distribution within
each age interval Borrowing values from another population Making one of two assumptions:
– nax is half the length of the age interval (n/2), or
– nmx is constant in the interval which negates the necessity of using nax because there is a direct formula to calculate
npx: n xn mn xp e
![Page 5: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
nax in Practice
Usually use n/2 for all age groups except the first Mortality rate between ages 0 and 5 changes very
rapidly, falling very quickly at first and then flattening out Consequently most deaths early in life occur closer to 0
than to 5 and hence nax is significantly less than n/2 in the first two age groups (0, 1-4)
In general in other age groups where mortality is changing less rapidly, the overall life table is very insensitive to the exact choice of nax
![Page 6: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
nax for Very Young Ages
Males Females
Value of 1a0
I f 1m0 >= 0.107 0.330 0.350I f 1m0 < 0.107 0.045+2.684(1m0) 0.053+2.800(1m0)
Value of 4a1
I f 1m0 >= 0.107 1.352 1.361I f 1m0 < 0.107 1.651-2.816(1m0) 1.522-1.518(1m0)
![Page 7: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Example Sensitivity of ex to nax
Age Suggested All 50% All 25% All 75%
0 0.330 0.500 0.250 0.7501-4 1.332 2.000 1.000 3.0005-9 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.750
10-14 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75015-19 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75020-24 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75025-29 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75030-34 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75035-39 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75040-44 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75045-49 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75050-54 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75055-59 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75060-64 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75065-69 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75070-74 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75075-79 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.75080-84 2.500 2.500 1.250 3.750
e(0) 44.443219 44.3598 44.00779 44.714498error (% ) -na- -0.19% -0.79% 1.61%
nax value
![Page 8: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Life Table Columns: nmx
Death rate in the cohort between ages x and x+n
In constructing a period life table, we usually start by assuming that the observed mortality rates are equal to the life table mortality rates: nmx ~nMx
n xn x
n x
dm
L
![Page 9: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Life Table Columns: nax
Average number of years lived in the age interval by those dying in the age interval
We must acquire the nax values from somewhere, discussed previously
n xa
![Page 10: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Life Table Columns: nqx
n xn x
x
dq
l
Probability of dying between ages x and x+n
This is where we usually start constructing the life table:
1
n xn x
n x n x
n Mq
n a M
![Page 11: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Life Table Columns: npx
Probability of surviving from ages x to x+n
1x n x n xn x n x
x x
l l dp q
l l
![Page 12: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Life Table Columns: lx
x n x n xl l p Survivors, number left alive at age x+n
![Page 13: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Life Table Columns: ndx
Number dying between ages x and x+n
n x x x nd l l
![Page 14: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Life Table Columns: nLx
Person-years lived between ages x and x+n
Because n is effectively infinite for the open (last) age interval, we cannot calculate nLx given the formulas we have:
n x x n n x n xL n l a d
xx
x
lL
m
![Page 15: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Life Table Columns: Tx
Person-years lived at ages older than x
x n aa x
T L
![Page 16: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Life Table Columns: ex
Expectation of life at age x; average additional years of life that someone who survives to age x can expect to live
Single-Life-Table-Template.xls
0 xx
x
Te
l
![Page 17: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Additional Ways of Using a Life Table
Probability of surviving from age x to age y
Probability of dying between ages x and y
Number of people dying between ages x and y
Number of person years lived between ages x and y
Probability that a newborn will die between ages x and x+n
yy x x
x
lp
l
x y y x xl l d
1 1 y x y y x x
y x x y x xx x x
l l l dq p
l l l
x y y x xT T L
0
n xdl
![Page 18: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Additional Ways of Using a Life Table
Probability that a newborn will experience their death between ages x and y
Number of years that a newborn can expect to live between ages x and y
Probability that newborn will survive to age x
Probability that a newborn will die before age x
0
( ) xlp xl
0 0
0 0 0
( ) 1 ( ) 1 x xx l l dlq x p x
l l l
0 0
x y y x xl l d
l l
0
x yT T
l
![Page 19: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
The Life Table as Stationary Population
A stationary population has:– Age-specific mortality constant through time– The number of births constant through time– Net migration = 0 at all ages
size and age structure that are constant through time
x xp0 Jan. 1 Jan. 2 Jan. 3 Jan. 4 Jan. 5 Jan. 6 Jan. 7 Jan. 8 Jan. 9 Jan. 10 . Dec. 31
0 1.000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 . 10001 0.970 970 970 970 970 970 970 970 970 970 . 9702 0.950 950 950 950 950 950 950 950 950 . 9503 0.946 946 946 946 946 946 946 946 . 9464 0.942 942 942 942 942 942 942 . 9425 0.938 938 938 938 938 938 . 9386 0.935 935 935 935 935 . 9357 0.932 932 932 932 . 9328 0.930 930 930 . 9309 0.928 928 . 928
. . . .364 0.900 900
Population alive on:Age in days
Probability of surviving to age x
![Page 20: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Stationary Population Life Table Columns
is the number of births each year
is the number at age x in each year
is the number between age x and x+n in each year
is the number above age x in each year
is the population size
is the number dying between age x and x+n each year
is the mean age at death
xl
xTn xL
0T
n xd00e
0l
![Page 21: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Stationary Population Relationships
0
00 0
0
1 1lBCBR
TPY T el
0
1CBR CDR
e
1 1x
xxx x
x
lm
TT el
101 1 1 2
10 0 0 0
10
1x
x x xx
aa
llL L L
C CBRT l T lL
2 2
0 0
n nx x
n x
n l l
C CBR n CBRl l
![Page 22: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Simple Examples
Constant graduate student population of size 40 with 10 new and 10 graduating each year:
Constant number of employees, average time spent in a job is five years:
0
1 10.2 20% attrition rate
5CDR CBR
e
![Page 23: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
LIFE TABLES FROM SOUTH AFRICA
Life-Tables_South-Africa.xls
![Page 24: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
nqxAgincourt, Male
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
01-
45-
9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
9
Age (Years)
nq
x
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 92-04
![Page 25: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
nqxAgincourt, Female
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
01-
45-
9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
9
Age (Years)
nq
x
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 92-04
![Page 26: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
lxAgincourt, Male
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000
01-
45-
9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
9
Age (Years)
l x
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 92-04
![Page 27: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
lxAgincourt, Female
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000
01-
45-
9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
9
Age (Years)
l x
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 92-04
![Page 28: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
ndxAgincourt, Male
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
22,000
24,000
01-
45-
9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
9
Age (Years)
nd
x
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 92-04
![Page 29: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
ndxAgincourt, Female
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
22,000
24,000
01-
45-
9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
9
Age (Years)
nd
x
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 92-04
![Page 30: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
TxAgincourt, Male
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
01-
45-
9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
9
Age (Years)
Tx
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 92-04
![Page 31: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
TxAgincourt, Female
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
01-
45-
9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
9
Age (Years)
Tx
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 92-04
![Page 32: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
exAgincourt, Male
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
01-
45-
9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
9
Age (Years)
e x
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 92-04
![Page 33: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
exAgincourt, Female
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
01-
45-
9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
9
Age (Years)
e x
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 92-04
![Page 34: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Male Proportional Age StructureAgincourt 1992-2004
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
0-5
5-9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
910
0+
Age (years)
Pro
po
rtio
n (
per
cen
t)
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
92-04
![Page 35: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Female Proportional Age StructureAgincourt 1992-2004
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
0-5
5-9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
910
0+
Age (years)
Pro
po
rtio
n (
per
cen
t)
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
92-04
![Page 36: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
1992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004
01-
45-
9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
910
0+
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
lx
Year
Age (Years)
Trend in Male Survival CurvesAgincourt 1992-2004
![Page 37: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
1992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004
01-
45-
9
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85-8
9
90-9
4
95-9
910
0+
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
lx
Year
Age (Years)
Trend in Female Survival CurvesAgincourt 1992-2004
![Page 38: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Life Table Template
Examine life table template It is possible to calculate standard errors around life
table values See:
Chiang, C.L. 1984. The Life Table and Its Applications. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
Single-Life-Table-Template.xls
![Page 39: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
CHILD MORTALITYTrend in Probability of Dying between Ages 0 and 5, 5q0
Agincourt 1992-2004
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Year
5q0
per
1,0
00
Female
Male
Male (2nd Poly.)
Female (2nd Poly.)
![Page 40: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
ADOLESCENT MORTALITYTrend in Probability of Dying between Ages 5 and 15, 10q5
Agincourt 1992-2004
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Year
10q
5 p
er 1
,000
FemaleMaleMale (linear)Female (linear)
![Page 41: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
ADULT MORTALITYTrend in Probability of Dying between Ages 15 and 60, 45q15
Agincourt 1992-2004
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Year
45q
15 p
er 1
,000
Female
Male
Male (2nd Poly.)
Female (2nd Poly.)
![Page 42: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
OLDER ADULT MORTALITYTrend in Probability of Dying between Ages 60 and 90, 30q60
Agincourt 1992-2004
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Year
30q
60 p
er 1
,000
Female
Male
Male (linear)
Female (linear)
![Page 43: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
OLDER ADULT MORTALITYTrend in Probability of Dying between Ages 50 and 65, 15q50
Agincourt 1992-2004
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Year
15q
50 p
er 1
,000
Female
Male
Male (3rd Poly.)
Female (2nd Poly.)
InflectionPoint
Converging Trend
Diverging Trend
![Page 44: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Trend in Expectation of Life at Birth, e0
Agincourt 1992-2004
50.0
52.5
55.0
57.5
60.0
62.5
65.0
67.5
70.0
72.5
75.0
77.5
80.0
82.5
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Year
e0 (
Yea
rs)
Female
Male
Male fit (2nd Poly.)
Female fit (2nd Poly.)
![Page 45: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
LIFE TABLES FROM ZAMBIA
Life-Tables_Zambia.xls
![Page 46: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Life Table Probability of Dying nqx 1957-1995
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Age
per 1,00
0
Female Male
![Page 47: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Life Table Survivors lx 1957-1995
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
Age
Female Male
![Page 48: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
Life Table Probability of Dying nqx 1957-1961
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 1-4 5-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79
Age
per 1,00
0
Female Male
![Page 49: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
Life Table Survivors lx 1957-1961
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
0 1-4 5-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79
Age
Female Male
![Page 50: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
Life Table Probability of Dying nqx 1992-1995
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 1-4 5-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79
Age
per 1,00
0
Female Male
![Page 51: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
Life Table Survivors lx 1992-1995
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
0 1-4 5-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79
Female Male
![Page 52: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
LIFE TABLES FROM USA
Male-USA-LTs-1959-2002.xls
Human-Mortality-Database-1x1.mdb
![Page 53: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
nMxUSA, Male
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0
2
4
6
8
1
0
12
1
4
16
1
8
20
2
2
24
2
6
28
3
0
32
3
4
36
3
8
40
4
2
44
4
6
48
5
0
52
5
4
56
5
8
60
6
2
64
6
6
68
7
0
72
7
4
76
7
8
80
8
2
84
8
6
88
9
0
92
9
4
96
9
8
100
10
2
104
10
6
108
11
0+
Age (Year)
nM
x
1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
![Page 54: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
naxUSA, Male
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0
2
4
6
8
1
0
12
1
4
16
1
8
20
2
2
24
2
6
28
3
0
32
3
4
36
3
8
40
4
2
44
4
6
48
5
0
52
5
4
56
5
8
60
6
2
64
6
6
68
7
0
72
7
4
76
7
8
80
8
2
84
8
6
88
9
0
92
9
4
96
9
8
100
10
2
104
10
6
108
Age (Year)
na x
1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
![Page 55: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
55
nqxUSA, Male
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0
2
4
6
8
1
0
12
1
4
16
1
8
20
2
2
24
2
6
28
3
0
32
3
4
36
3
8
40
4
2
44
4
6
48
5
0
52
5
4
56
5
8
60
6
2
64
6
6
68
7
0
72
7
4
76
7
8
80
8
2
84
8
6
88
9
0
92
9
4
96
9
8
100
10
2
104
10
6
108
Age (Year)
nq
x
1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
![Page 56: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
nqxUSA, Male
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.1
0
2
4
6
8
1
0
12
1
4
16
1
8
20
2
2
24
2
6
28
3
0
32
3
4
36
3
8
40
4
2
44
4
6
48
5
0
52
5
4
56
5
8
60
6
2
64
6
6
68
7
0
72
7
4
76
7
8
80
8
2
84
8
6
88
9
0
92
9
4
96
9
8
100
10
2
104
10
6
108
Age (Year)
nq
x
1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
![Page 57: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
57
lxUSA, Male
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000
0
2
4
6
8
1
0
12
1
4
16
1
8
20
2
2
24
2
6
28
3
0
32
3
4
36
3
8
40
4
2
44
4
6
48
5
0
52
5
4
56
5
8
60
6
2
64
6
6
68
7
0
72
7
4
76
7
8
80
8
2
84
8
6
88
9
0
92
9
4
96
9
8
100
10
2
104
10
6
108
Age (Year)
l x
1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
![Page 58: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
ndxUSA, Male
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
0
2
4
6
8
1
0
12
1
4
16
1
8
20
2
2
24
2
6
28
3
0
32
3
4
36
3
8
40
4
2
44
4
6
48
5
0
52
5
4
56
5
8
60
6
2
64
6
6
68
7
0
72
7
4
76
7
8
80
8
2
84
8
6
88
9
0
92
9
4
96
9
8
100
10
2
104
10
6
108
Age (Year)
nd
x
1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
![Page 59: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
59
nLxUSA, Male
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000
0
2
4
6
8
1
0
12
1
4
16
1
8
20
2
2
24
2
6
28
3
0
32
3
4
36
3
8
40
4
2
44
4
6
48
5
0
52
5
4
56
5
8
60
6
2
64
6
6
68
7
0
72
7
4
76
7
8
80
8
2
84
8
6
88
9
0
92
9
4
96
9
8
100
10
2
104
10
6
108
Age (Year)
nL
x
1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
![Page 60: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
60
TxUSA, Male
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
0
2
4
6
8
1
0
12
1
4
16
1
8
20
2
2
24
2
6
28
3
0
32
3
4
36
3
8
40
4
2
44
4
6
48
5
0
52
5
4
56
5
8
60
6
2
64
6
6
68
7
0
72
7
4
76
7
8
80
8
2
84
8
6
88
9
0
92
9
4
96
9
8
100
10
2
104
10
6
108
Age (Year)
Tx
1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
![Page 61: Using & Interpreting the Single Decrement Life Table](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081419/56814c5d550346895db97cbb/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
61
exUSA, Male
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
2
4
6
8
1
0
12
1
4
16
1
8
20
2
2
24
2
6
28
3
0
32
3
4
36
3
8
40
4
2
44
4
6
48
5
0
52
5
4
56
5
8
60
6
2
64
6
6
68
7
0
72
7
4
76
7
8
80
8
2
84
8
6
88
9
0
92
9
4
96
9
8
100
10
2
104
10
6
108
Age (Year)
e x (
Yea
r)
1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002