using overhead projector to simulate x-ray diffraction experiments

2
In the Classroom 1240 Journal of Chemical Education Vol. 76 No. 9 September 1999 JChemEd.chem.wisc.edu Overhead Projector Demonstrations edited by Doris K. Kolb Bradley University Peoria, IL 61625 Using Overhead Projector to Simulate X-ray Diffraction Experiments Veljko Dragojlovic Department of Chemistry, Northwest Community College, 5331 McConnell Avenue, Terrace, BC, V8G 4C2, Canada; [email protected] Several demonstrations described in this Journal employ lasers to demonstrate diffraction of light and illustrate X-ray crystallography experiments (1–6 ). A similar demonstration can be performed using a common overhead projector. The setup is shown in Figure 1. The glass surface of the overhead projector was covered with a piece of cardboard, which had an 8-mm circular or square hole in the center. The projector was focused so that a circular (or square) spot was projected onto the screen. A white board made a good projection screen, as one could mark the position of spots on it. In the path of the light beam we placed a pattern made of a combination of transmission diffraction gratings (7 ). 1 Thus, white light was dispersed into a spectrum and a diffraction pattern was obtained (Fig. 2). This diffraction pattern depends on the combination of diffraction gratings. We used a single diffraction grating, two diffraction gratings pasted together at an angle of 90° , three diffraction gratings pasted together at angles of 60°, and six diffraction gratings in a helical arrangement. In a dark room, and using relatively good- quality gratings, third-order diffraction spots were visible. A projection distance of 2.4 m gave an 80-cm diffraction spacing (first order, red band) on the screen. If the central spot of the diffraction pattern is perceived as too bright, it can be labeled with a black marker. As the third-order diffraction spot may not be immediately visible, covering and uncover- ing the hole in the projector cover should help students to locate its position. Since human eyes are most sensitive to green light, most students are able to locate the position of the green band of the third-order diffraction. This is a good place to introduce averted vision technique to students. To illustrate diffraction of a light beam of a single color (narrow band of wavelengths) a suitable filter can be used. 2 Because the filters attenuate light, the third-order diffraction spots may no longer be visible. The light beam can be made visible by spraying water mist along the light beam from an atomizer such as an ordinary plant-leaf sprayer. Students can be asked what factors affect the observed diffraction pattern. From the observation that white light was dispersed into a spectrum of colors, they should be able to conclude that different wavelengths of light were diffracted by different angles. After some discussion, this should lead into the conclusion that using a single wavelength will allow us to determine the distance between the individual grooves of the grating. After the wavelength of diffracted light and the distance between the grooves were compared (λ = 400–700 nm for the visible light and d 4200 nm for the diffraction grating), students were asked to draw a conclusion about the Diffraction gratings covering lens Carboard covering projector surface Figure 1. Overhead projector with a mask and diffraction grating. Present address: Department of Math, Science, and Technology, Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Ave., Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314. electromagnetic radiation wavelength necessary to obtain diffraction patterns of crystals. Given that the distances in crystals are of the order of 10 {10 m, the electromagnetic radiation wavelength is λ 10 {10 –10 {11 m (X-rays). As a classroom activity (similar to one described in the ref 1) the spacing between the lines of a grating can be calculated if the wavelength of transmitted light is known. 3 Alternatively, once the spacing is known, the wavelength of diffracted light can be calculated. The light beam should be orthogonal to the screen, and Fraunhofer’s equation for diffraction should be used as described in ref 2. For this activity it is the best if there is a square hole on the projector cover and the distance b is measured from the edge of the central (zero-order) square to the corresponding edge of the first-order diffraction square (Fig. 3). This activity is particu- larly suitable for high school students because it does not use laser pointers and therefore requires neither safety precautions nor extensive supervision.

Upload: veljko

Post on 31-Jan-2017

215 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Using Overhead Projector to Simulate X-ray Diffraction Experiments

In the Classroom

1240 Journal of Chemical Education • Vol. 76 No. 9 September 1999 • JChemEd.chem.wisc.edu

Overhead Projector Demonstrationsedited by

Doris K. KolbBradley UniversityPeoria, IL 61625

Using Overhead Projector to SimulateX-ray Diffraction Experiments

Veljko Dragojlovic†

Department of Chemistry, Northwest Community College, 5331 McConnell Avenue, Terrace, BC, V8G 4C2, Canada;[email protected]

Several demonstrations described in this Journal employlasers to demonstrate diffraction of light and illustrate X-raycrystallography experiments (1–6 ). A similar demonstrationcan be performed using a common overhead projector.

The setup is shown in Figure 1. The glass surface of theoverhead projector was covered with a piece of cardboard,which had an 8-mm circular or square hole in the center.The projector was focused so that a circular (or square) spotwas projected onto the screen. A white board made a goodprojection screen, as one could mark the position of spotson it. In the path of the light beam we placed a pattern made ofa combination of transmission diffraction gratings (7).1 Thus,white light was dispersed into a spectrum and a diffractionpattern was obtained (Fig. 2). This diffraction pattern dependson the combination of diffraction gratings. We used a singlediffraction grating, two diffraction gratings pasted togetherat an angle of 90°, three diffraction gratings pasted togetherat angles of 60°, and six diffraction gratings in a helicalarrangement. In a dark room, and using relatively good-quality gratings, third-order diffraction spots were visible. Aprojection distance of 2.4 m gave an 80-cm diffraction spacing(first order, red band) on the screen. If the central spot ofthe diffraction pattern is perceived as too bright, it can belabeled with a black marker. As the third-order diffractionspot may not be immediately visible, covering and uncover-ing the hole in the projector cover should help students tolocate its position. Since human eyes are most sensitive togreen light, most students are able to locate the position ofthe green band of the third-order diffraction. This is a goodplace to introduce averted vision technique to students. Toillustrate diffraction of a light beam of a single color (narrowband of wavelengths) a suitable filter can be used.2 Becausethe filters attenuate light, the third-order diffraction spots mayno longer be visible. The light beam can be made visible byspraying water mist along the light beam from an atomizersuch as an ordinary plant-leaf sprayer.

Students can be asked what factors affect the observeddiffraction pattern. From the observation that white light wasdispersed into a spectrum of colors, they should be able toconclude that different wavelengths of light were diffractedby different angles. After some discussion, this should leadinto the conclusion that using a single wavelength will allow

us to determine the distance between the individual groovesof the grating. After the wavelength of diffracted light and thedistance between the grooves were compared (λ = 400–700nm for the visible light and d ≈ 4200 nm for the diffractiongrating), students were asked to draw a conclusion about the

Diffraction gratingscovering lens

Carboard coveringprojector surface

Figure 1. Overhead projector with a mask and diffraction grating.

†Present address: Department of Math, Science, and Technology,Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Ave., Ft. Lauderdale,FL 33314.

electromagnetic radiation wavelength necessary to obtaindiffraction patterns of crystals. Given that the distancesin crystals are of the order of 10{10 m, the electromagneticradiation wavelength is λ ≈ 10{10–10{11 m (X-rays).

As a classroom activity (similar to one described in theref 1) the spacing between the lines of a grating can becalculated if the wavelength of transmitted light is known.3

Alternatively, once the spacing is known, the wavelength ofdiffracted light can be calculated. The light beam should beorthogonal to the screen, and Fraunhofer’s equation fordiffraction should be used as described in ref 2. For thisactivity it is the best if there is a square hole on the projectorcover and the distance b is measured from the edge of thecentral (zero-order) square to the corresponding edge of thefirst-order diffraction square (Fig. 3). This activity is particu-larly suitable for high school students because it does not uselaser pointers and therefore requires neither safety precautionsnor extensive supervision.

Page 2: Using Overhead Projector to Simulate X-ray Diffraction Experiments

In the Classroom

JChemEd.chem.wisc.edu • Vol. 76 No. 9 September 1999 • Journal of Chemical Education 1241

Notes

1. Replica diffraction gratings mounted on a 35 mm slides wereobtained from Edmund Scientific Company, 101 E. Gloucester Pike,Barrington, NJ 08007-1380, stock # C39,502. These slides were ofuneven quality. Out of a package of 25 slides, only six were of satisfac-tory quality for this demonstration. Diffraction grating sheets providedby the same supplier (stock # C40,267) were of better quality and thepatterns for the demonstration were prepared by cutting the sheets tosize and mounting them on a 6’’ x 6’’ cardboard frames.

2. Plastic color filters were obtained from Sargent-Welch Scien-tific Company, P.O. Box 20060, London, Ontario, N6K 4G6; stock# 3662.

3. The absorption maxima for the filters from note 2 were 448,535, and ~660 nm for the blue, green, and red filter, respectively. Iwould like to thank Don Hill from the Northwest Community Col-lege for recording the absorption spectra of the filters.

Literature Cited

1. Hughes, E. Jr.; Holmes, L. H. Jr. J. Chem. Educ. 1997, 74, 298.2. Lisensky, G. C.; Kelly, T. F.; Neu, D. R.; Ellis, A. B. J. Chem.

Educ. 1991, 68, 91.3. Klier, K.; Taylor, J. A. J. Chem. Educ. 1991, 68, 155.4. Spencer, B. H.; Zare, R. N. J. Chem. Educ. 1991, 68, 97.5. Segschneider, C.; Versmold, H. J. Chem. Educ. 1990, 67, 967.6. Brisse, F.; Sundararajan, P. K. J. Chem. Educ. 1975, 52, 414.7. A detailed review on the manufacture and properties of diffrac-

tion gratings appeared in Grossman, W. E. L. J. Chem. Educ. 1993,70, 741.

Figure 2. Diffraction patterns obtained with (a) blue filter, (b) red filter, and (c) without a filter.

a cb

Diffractiongrating

Screenb

ac

φ

Figure 3. Diffraction experiment with transmission diffraction grating.