ust golden notes - election law

Upload: jerik-solas

Post on 01-Jun-2018

244 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    1/25

    ELECTION LAW

    K.ELECTIONLAW

    157UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

    F a c u l t a d d e D e r e c h o i v i l

    ACADEMICSCHAIR:LESTERJAYALANE.FLORESII

    VICECHAIRSFORACADEMICS:KARENJOYG.SABUGO&JOHNHENRYC.MENDOZA

    VICECHAIRFORADMINISTRATIONANDFINANCE:JEANELLEC.LEE

    VICECHAIRSFORLAYOUTANDDESIGN:EARLLOUIEM.MASACAYAN&THEENAC.MARTINEZ

    Q:Whatisanelection?

    A:Itistheselectionofcandidatestopublicoffice

    bypopularvoteofthepeople.

    Q:Whatarethecomponentsofanelection?

    A:

    1. Choice or selection of candidates to

    publicofficebypopularvote

    2.

    Conductofthepolls

    3.

    Listingofvotes

    4.

    Holdingofelectoralcampaign

    5. Actofcastingand receiving theballots

    fromthevoters

    6. Countingtheballots

    7. Makingtheelectionreturns

    8.

    Proclaimingthe

    winning

    candidates

    Q:Whatarethetypesofelections?

    A:

    1.

    Regularelection refers toanelection

    participated in by those who possess

    therightofsuffrage,arenototherwise

    disqualified by law, and who are

    registeredvoters.

    a.NationalElection

    i.forPresidentandVP

    ii.for

    Senators

    b.LocalElections

    i.ForMembersofHOR

    ii.PartyListRepresentatives

    iii.ProvincialOfficials

    iv.CityOfficials

    v.MunicipalOfficials

    c.BarangayElections

    d.ARRMElections

    i.ForRegionalGovernor

    ii.RegionalViceGovernor

    iii.RegionalAssemblymen

    e.SanggguniangKabataan

    (SK)

    Elections

    2.

    Special election one held to fill a

    vacancy in office before theexpiration

    of the term for which the incumbent

    waselected.

    a. Plebisciteelectoral process by

    whichaninitiativeontheConstitutionis

    approvedorrejectedbythepeople.

    b. Initiativepower of the people to

    propose amendments to the

    Constitution

    orto

    propose

    and

    enact

    legislations

    throughelectioncalledforthepurpose

    i.InitiativeontheConstitution

    ii.InitiativeonStatutes

    iii. Initiative on Local

    Legislation

    c. Referendumpower of the

    electorate toapproveor rejectapiece

    of legislationthroughanelectioncalled

    forthepurpose.

    i.ReferendumonStatutes

    ii.ReferendumonLocalLaws

    d.Recallmode

    of

    removal

    of

    an

    elective public officer by the people

    beforetheendofhistermofoffice.

    Q:Whataretherulesonconstructionofelection

    laws?

    A:

    CONSTRUCTIONOFELECTIONLAW

    Laws for conduct of

    elections

    1.Before the election

    Mandatory

    2.After the election

    Directory

    LawsforcandidatesMandatory

    and

    strictly

    construed

    Proceduralrules

    Liberally construed in

    favorofascertainingthe

    willoftheelections

    Q:Whenwilltheelectionperiodcommence?

    A: The election period shall commence 90 days

    before the dayof the election and shallend 30

    days thereafter. (Sec. 3, B.P. 881 Omnibus

    ElectionCode)

    Q:Whatisthepurposeofanelection?

    A:Togivethevotersadirectparticipation inthe

    affairsoftheirpublicofficialsorindecidingsome

    questions of public interest. (Luna v. Rodriguez,

    G.R.No.L13744,November29,1918)

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    2/25

    USTGOLDENNOTES2011

    158POLITICALLAWTEAM:

    ADVISER:ATTY.EDWINREYSANDOVAL;SUBJECTHEAD:RACHELMARIE L.FELICES;ASST.SUBJECTHEADS:WIVINOE.BRACEROII&

    HERAZEUSCHRISTINEY.UY;MEMBERS:LAWRENCEPAULOH.AQUINO,LEANDRORODELV.ATIENZA,MARINETHEASTERAND.AYOS,

    CARLOR.BALA,WILFREDOT.BONILLA,JR.,KEELACHERNARR.DINOY,APRILV.ENRILE,KENNETHJAMESCARLOC.HIZON,JOSEMARIA

    G.MENDOZA,ROGERCHRISTOPHERR.REYES,ROMILINDAC.SIBAL,JASMINM.SISON,ZARAHPATRICIAT.SUAREZ,RALPHJULIOUSL.VILLAMOR.

    a.SUFFRAGE

    Q:Whatistherightofsuffrage?

    A:Itistherighttovoteintheelectionofofficers

    chosenbythepeopleandinthedeterminationof

    questionssubmittedtothepeople.Itincludes:

    1. Election

    2. Plebiscite

    3. Initiativeand

    4. Referendum

    Q:Istherightofsuffrageabsolute?

    A: No.Needlesstosay,theexerciseoftheright

    ofsuffrage,asintheenjoymentofallotherrights,

    is subject to existing substantive and procedural

    requirements embodied in our Constitution,

    statute

    books

    and

    other

    repositories

    of

    law.

    (AKBAYANYOUTHv.COMELEC,G.R.No.147066,

    March26,2001)

    b.QUALIFICATIONANDDISQUALIFICATIONOF

    VOTERS

    Q:Whatarethequalificationsforsuffrage?

    A:

    1. Filipinocitizenship

    2.

    Atleast

    18

    years

    of

    age

    3. Resident of the Philippines for at least

    oneyear

    4. Resident of the place where he

    proposestovoteforat least6months;

    and

    5. Not otherwise disqualified by law (Sec.

    9,R.A.No.8189)

    Q:Whataretheproceduralqualifications?

    A: As to the procedural limitation, the right of a

    citizen to vote is necessarily conditioned upon

    certain procedural requirements he must

    undergo: among others, the process of

    registration. Specifically, acitizen inorder to be

    qualifiedtoexercisehisrighttovote, inaddition

    to the minimum requirements set by the

    fundamentalcharter,isobligedbylawtoregister,

    at present, under the provisions of Republic Act

    No. 8189, otherwise known as the Voters

    Registration Act of 1996.(AkbayanYouth v.

    COMELEC,G.R.No.147066,Mar.26,2001)

    Q:Whoaredisqualifiedtovote?

    A:

    1.

    Persons

    sentenced

    by

    final

    judgment

    to

    suffer imprisonment for not less than

    one year, unless pardoned or granted

    amnesty;butright isreacquiredbefore

    expiration of 5 years after service of

    sentence

    2. Conviction by finaljudgment of any of

    thefollowingcrimes:

    a. Crime involving disloyalty to the

    government

    b.Anycrimeagainstnationalsecurity

    c.Firearmslaws

    Butrightisreacquiredbeforeexpiration

    of5yearsafterserviceofsentence.

    3.

    Insanity or incompetence declared by

    competentauthority(Sec.118,B.P.881

    OmnibusElectionCode)

    c.REGISTRATIONOFVOTERS

    Q:Doesregistrationconfertherighttovote?

    A: No. It is but a condition precedent to the

    exercise of the right to vote. Registration is a

    regulation,notaqualification.(Yrav.Abano,G.R.

    No.L30187,

    November

    15,

    1928)

    Q:Whatistheeffectoftransferofresidence?

    A:Anyperson,who transfersresidencesolelyby

    reason of his occupation, profession or

    employment in private or public service,

    education,etc.,shallnotbedeemedtohave lost

    hisoriginalresidence.(Asistiov.Aguirre,G.R.No.

    191124,April27,2010)

    Q:Whatisdomicile?

    A: A place to which, whenever absent for

    business or for pleasure, one intends to return,

    and depends on facts and circumstances in the

    sense that they disclose intent. (Romualdez

    Marcosvs.COMELEC,G.R.No.119976,Sept.18,

    1995)

    Q:Whatisresidenceforelectionpurposes?

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    3/25

    ELECTION LAW

    A: It implies the factual relationship of an

    individual to a certain place. It is the physical

    presenceofaperson inagivenarea,community

    orcountry. Forelectionpurposestheconceptsof

    residence and domicile are dictated by the

    peculiar criteria of political laws. As these

    conceptshave

    evolved

    in

    our

    election

    law,

    what

    hasclearlyandunequivocallyemerged isthefact

    that residence for election purposes is used

    synonymouslywithdomicile.(Ibid.)

    Q: Petitioner ran congressman of the First

    DistrictofLaguna. InhisCoC,he indicated that

    his complete/exactaddress is inSta.RosaCity,

    Laguna. Vicente sought the cancellation of

    petitionersCOCandthe lattersdisqualification

    as a candidate on the ground of an alleged

    materialmisrepresentation inhisCoC regarding

    hisplace

    of

    residence,

    because

    during

    past

    elections,hehaddeclaredPagsanjan,Lagunaas

    his address, and Pagsanjanwas located in the

    Fourth District of Laguna and that Vicente is

    merelyleasingapropertyinhisallegedSta.Rosa

    residence.Does the constitution require that a

    candidate be a property owner in the district

    whereheintendstorun?

    A:No.Although itistruethatthe latestacquired

    abodeisnotnecessarilythedomicileofchoiceof

    a candidate, there isnothing in theConstitution

    orour

    election

    laws

    which

    require

    acongressional

    candidate to sell a previously acquired home in

    onedistrictandbuyanewoneintheplacewhere

    he seeks to run in order to qualify for a

    congressional seat in thatotherdistrict. Neither

    doweseethefactthatVicentewasonlyleasinga

    residenceinSta.Rosaatthetimeofhiscandidacy

    as a barrier for him to run in that district.

    Certainly, the Constitution does not require a

    congressional candidate tobe apropertyowner

    inthedistrictwhereheseekstorunbutonlythat

    heresides inthatdistrictforat leastayearprior

    toElection

    Day.

    To

    use

    ownership

    of

    property

    in

    the district as the determinative indicium of

    permanenceofdomicileorresidenceimpliesthat

    onlythelandedcanestablishcompliancewiththe

    residency requirement. This Courtwould be, in

    effect, imposing a property requirement to the

    right to hold public office, which property

    requirement would be unconstitutional.

    (Fernandez v. HRET, G.R. No. 187478, Dec. 29,

    2009)

    Q:Whoisadoubleregistrant?

    A: Any person who, being a registered voter,

    registersanew

    without

    filing

    an

    application

    for

    cancellationofhisprevious registration. (Sec.26

    (y)(6),OmnibusElectionCode)

    Q:Maruhomregisteredasavoter inMarawion

    26 July 2003.Only three days after,Maruhom

    againregisteredasavoterinMarantao,without

    firstcancelingherregistrationinMarawi;andon

    28 March 2007, Maruhom filed her COC

    declaring that she was a registered voter in

    Marantaoandeligible torunasacandidate for

    thepositionofmayorofsaidmunicipality.Isshe

    stillqualified

    to

    run

    for

    such

    position

    in

    Marantao?

    A: No. Her prior registration makes her

    subsequentregistrationnullandvoid.Shecannot

    beconsideredaregisteredvoterinMarantaoand

    thusshemadea falserepresentation inherCOC

    whensheclaimedtobeone.Ifacandidatestates

    amaterialrepresentationintheCOCthatisfalse,

    theCOMELEC isempowered todenyduecourse

    toor cancel theCOC. Thepersonwhose COC is

    deniedduecourseorcancelledunderSection78

    ofthe

    OEC

    is

    not

    treated

    as

    acandidate

    at

    all,

    as

    if

    suchpersonneverfiledaCOC.However,although

    Maruhoms registration inMarantao is void,her

    registration inMarawi still subsists. Shemaybe

    barred from voting or running formayor in the

    former, but she may still exercise her right to

    vote, or even run for an elective post, in the

    latter. (Maruhom v. COMELEC,G.R.No.179430,

    July27,2009)

    Q:Aredoubleregistrantsstillqualifiedtovote?

    A:Yes,

    double

    registrants

    are

    still

    qualified

    to

    vote provided that COMELEC has to make a

    determinationonwhich registration is valid and

    which isvoid. COMELECcouldnotconsiderboth

    registrationsvalidbecauseitwouldthengiverise

    to the anomalous situationwhere a voter could

    voteintwoprecinctsatthesametime.COMELEC

    laiddown the rule inMinuteResolutionNo.00

    1513thatwhilethefirstregistrationofanyvoter

    159

    UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

    F a c u l t a d d e D e r e c h o i v i l

    ACADEMICSCHAIR:LESTERJAYALANE.FLORESII

    VICECHAIRSFORACADEMICS:KARENJOYG.SABUGO&JOHNHENRYC.MENDOZA

    VICECHAIRFORADMINISTRATIONANDFINANCE:JEANELLEC.LEE

    VICECHAIRSFORLAYOUTANDDESIGN:EARLLOUIEM.MASACAYAN&THEENAC.MARTINEZ

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    4/25

    USTGOLDENNOTES2011

    subsists, any subsequent registration thereto is

    void ab initio. (Maruhom v. COMELEC, G.R. No.

    179430,July27,2009)

    Q: Y filed a petition for the cancellation of the

    certificateofcandidacy(COC)ofX.Essentially,Y

    sought the disqualification of X for Mayor of

    South Upi, Maguindanao, alleging, that X was

    not a registered voter in the Municipality of

    South Upi, Maguindanao since he failed to sign

    his application for registration, and that the

    unsignedapplicationforregistrationhasnolegal

    effect. In refutation, X asseverated that his

    failuretosignhisapplicationforregistrationdid

    notaffectthevalidityofhisregistrationsincehe

    possesses the qualifications of a voter set forth

    in the Omnibus Election Code as amended by

    Section9ofRepublicAct8189.Yinsiststhatthe

    signature

    in

    the

    application

    for

    registration

    is

    indispensable for its validity as it is an

    authentication and affirmation of the data

    appearingtherein.ShouldXbedisqualified?

    A:Yes.R.A.8189,TheVotersRegistrationActof

    1996,specificallyprovidesthatanapplicationfor

    registration shall contain specimen signatures of

    the applicant as well as his/her thumbprints,

    among others. The evidence shows that X failed

    to sign very important parts of the application,

    which refer to the oath which X should have

    takento

    validate

    and

    swear

    to

    the

    veracity

    of

    the

    contents appearing in the application for

    registration. Plainly, from the foregoing, the

    irregularities surrounding Xs application for

    registrationeloquentlyproclaims thathedidnot

    comply with the minimum requirements of RA

    8189. This leads to only one conclusion: that X,

    not having demonstrated that he duly

    accomplished an application for registration, is

    not a registered voter. Hence, he must be

    disqualified to run for Mayor. (Gunsi Sr. v.

    COMELEC,G.R.No.168792,Feb.23,2009)

    Q:"A",whileof legalageandofsoundmind,is

    illiterate. He has asked your advice on how he

    canvoteinthecomingelectionforhisbrotheris

    runningformayor.Thiswillbethefirsttime"A"

    willvoteandhehasneverregisteredasavoter

    before. What advice will you give him on the

    procedureheneedstofollowinordertobeable

    tovote?

    A: The Constitution provides that until Congress

    shall have provided otherwise, illiterate and

    disabled voters shall be allowed to vote under

    existing lawsandregulations(Art,V,Sec.2). It is

    necessary for any qualified voter to register in

    ordertovote. (OmnibusElectionCode,Sec.115)

    In thecaseof illiterateanddisabledvoters,their

    voter'saffidavitmaybepreparedbyanyrelative

    withinthefourthcivildegreeofconsanguinityor

    affinityorbyanymemberoftheboardofelection

    inspectors who shall prepare the affidavit in

    accordance with the data supplied by the

    applicant.(Sec.14,R.A.No.8189)

    Q:Whatisthesystemofcontinuingregistration?

    A: GR: It is a system where the application of

    registration of voters shall be conducted daily in

    the

    office

    hours

    of

    the

    election

    officer

    during

    regularofficehours.

    XPN: No registration shall be conducted during

    the period starting 120 days before a regular

    election and 90 days before a special election

    (Sec.8,R.A.8189)

    Note: The SC upheld COMELECs denial of the

    requestfortwoadditionalregistrationdaysinorder

    toenfranchisemorethan4millionyouthwhofailed

    toregisteronorbeforeDecember27,2000.It isan

    accepted

    doctrine

    in

    administrative

    law

    that

    the

    determination of administrative agencies as to the

    operation, implementation andapplicationofa law

    is accorded greatest weight, considering that these

    specialized government bodies are, by their nature

    and functions, in the best position to know what

    they can possibly do or not do under prevailing

    circumstances(AkbayanYouthv.COMELEC,G.R.No.

    147066,Mar.26,2001)

    Q: On Nov. 12, 2008 respondent COMELEC

    issued Resolution 8514 set Dec. 2, 2008 to

    Dec.15, 2009 as the period of continuing voter

    registration using the biometrics process in all

    areas except ARMM. Subsequently COMELEC

    issued Resolution 8585 on Feb. 12, 2009

    adjusting the deadline of voter registration for

    theMay10,2010nationalandlocalelectionsto

    Oct. 31, 2009 instead of Dec. 15, 2009 as

    previously fixed by Resolution 8514. Petitioners

    challenge the validity of COMELEC Resolution

    160POLITICALLAWTEAM:

    ADVISER:ATTY.EDWINREYSANDOVAL;SUBJECTHEAD:RACHELMARIE L.FELICES;ASST.SUBJECTHEADS:WIVINOE.BRACEROII&

    HERAZEUSCHRISTINEY.UY;MEMBERS:LAWRENCEPAULOH.AQUINO,LEANDRORODELV.ATIENZA,MARINETHEASTERAND.AYOS,

    CARLOR.BALA,WILFREDOT.BONILLA,JR.,KEELACHERNARR.DINOY,APRILV.ENRILE,KENNETHJAMESCARLOC.HIZON,JOSEMARIA

    G.MENDOZA,ROGERCHRISTOPHERR.REYES,ROMILINDAC.SIBAL,JASMINM.SISON,ZARAHPATRICIAT.SUAREZ,RALPHJULIOUSL.VILLAMOR.

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    5/25

    ELECTION LAW

    8585 and seek the declaration of its nullity.

    Petitioners further contend that the COMELEC

    Resolution 8585 is an unconstitutional

    encroachment on the legislative power of

    Congressas itamendsthesystemofcontinuing

    voterregistrationunderSection8ofRA8189.Is

    COMELECResolution

    8585

    valid?

    Differentiate

    fromthecaseofAkbayanYouthv.COMELEC?

    A:Inthepresentcase,theCourtfindsnoground

    to hold that the mandate of continuing voter

    registrationcannotbereasonablyheldwithinthe

    period provided by RA 8189 (Absentee Voting),

    Sec.8 daily during the office hours, except

    during the period starting 120 days before the

    May 10,2010 regular elections. There is thus no

    occasion for theCOMELEC toexercise itspower

    tofixotherdatesordeadlinesthereof.

    The present case differs significantly from the

    AkbayanYouthvs.COMELEC.Inthesaidcase,the

    Court held that the COMELEC did not abuse its

    discretion in denying the request of the therein

    petitionersforanextensionoftheDec.27,2000

    deadline of voter registration for the May 14,

    2001 elections. For the therein petitioners filed

    their petitionwith the courtwithin the 120day

    periodfortheconductofvoterregistrationunder

    Sec.8,RA8189,andsoughttheconductofatwo

    day registrationof Feb.17, and18,2001, clearly

    withinthe

    120

    day

    prohibited

    period.

    TheclearimportoftheCourtspronouncementin

    AkbayanYouth is that had therein petitioners

    filedtheirpetitionandsoughtanextensiondate

    thatwasbeforethe120dayprohibitiveperiod,

    theirprayerwouldhavebeengrantedpursuantto

    themandateofRA8189(AbsenteeVoting).Inthe

    presentcase,asreflectedearlier,both thedates

    offilingofthepetition(October30,2009)andthe

    extensionsought(untilJanuary9,2010)areprior

    to the 120 day prohibitive period. The Court

    therefore,finds

    no

    legal

    impediment

    to

    the

    extension prayed for. (Kabataan partylist v.

    COMELEC,G.R.No.189868,Dec.15,2009)

    Q:Whatisabsenteevoting?

    A:Itisaprocessbywhichqualifiedcitizensofthe

    Philippines abroad exercise their right to vote

    pursuant to the constitutional mandate that

    Congress shall provide a system for absentee

    votingbyqualifiedFilipinosabroad(Sec.2,Art.V,

    1987 Constitution). Absentee voting is an

    exception to the sixmonth/one year residency

    requirement. (Macalintal v. Romulo, G.R. No.

    157013,July10,2003)

    Note:TheconstitutionalityofSec.18.5ofR.A.9189

    (AbsenteeVoting)isupheldwithrespectonlytothe

    authority given to the COMELEC to proclaim the

    winning candidates for the Senators and partylist

    representativesbutnotas to thepower tocanvass

    votes and proclaim the winning candidates for

    PresidentandVicepresident.(Ibid.)

    Q:Whoarequalifiedtovoteundertheabsentee

    votinglaw?

    A:Allcitizensof thePhilippinesabroad,whoare

    not otherwise disqualified by law, at least

    eighteen (18) years of age on the day of the

    elections,mayvote forpresident,vicepresident,

    senators and partylist representatives. (Sec. 4,

    R.A.9189)

    Q:Who are disqualified from voting under the

    absenteevotinglaw?

    A:

    1. Those who have lost their Filipino

    citizenship in accordance with

    Philippinelaws;

    2. Those who have expressly renounced

    their Philippine citizenship and who

    have pledged allegiance to a foreign

    country;

    3.

    Those who have committed and are

    convictedinafinaljudgmentbyacourt

    or tribunalofanoffensepunishableby

    imprisonment of not less than one (1)

    year, including those who have

    committed and been found guilty of

    DisloyaltyasdefinedunderArt.137of

    theRevisedPenalCode, suchdisability

    not having been removed by plenary

    pardonor

    amnesty;

    Note:However,anypersondisqualifiedto

    vote under this subsection shall

    automatically acquire the right to vote

    upon expiration of five (5) years after

    serviceofsentence;Providedfurther,that

    the Commissionmay take cognizance of

    finaljudgmentsissuedbyforeigncourtsor

    161

    UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

    F a c u l t a d d e D e r e c h o i v i l

    ACADEMICSCHAIR:LESTERJAYALANE.FLORESII

    VICECHAIRSFORACADEMICS:KARENJOYG.SABUGO&JOHNHENRYC.MENDOZA

    VICECHAIRFORADMINISTRATIONANDFINANCE:JEANELLEC.LEE

    VICECHAIRSFORLAYOUTANDDESIGN:EARLLOUIEM.MASACAYAN&THEENAC.MARTINEZ

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    6/25

    USTGOLDENNOTES2011

    tribunals only on the basis of reciprocity

    and subject to the formalities and

    processesprescribed bytheRulesofCourt

    onexecutionofjudgments;

    4. An immigrant or a permanent resident

    who

    is

    recognized

    as

    such

    in

    the

    host

    country

    Note: An immigrant or permanent

    resident may vote if he/she executes,

    upon registration, an affidavit prepared

    for the purpose by the Commission

    declaring that he/she shall resume actual

    physical permanent residence in the

    Philippines not later than three (3) years

    from approval of his/her registration

    under this Act. Such affidavit shall also

    state that he/she has not applied for

    citizenship

    in

    another

    country.

    Failure

    to

    returnshallbethecause for the removal

    of the name of the immigrant or

    permanent resident from the National

    Registry of Absentee Voters and his/her

    permanent disqualification to vote in

    absentia.

    5.

    Any citizen of the Philippines abroad

    previously declared insane or

    incompetentbycompetentauthority in

    thePhilippinesorabroad,asverifiedby

    thePhilippine embassies,consulatesor

    foreign

    service

    establishments

    concerned

    Note: Unless such competent authority

    subsequently certifies thatsuch person is

    no longer insane or incompetent. (Sec.5,

    AbsenteeVotingLaw)

    Q:Howisregistrationdoneforabsenteevoters?

    A: Registration as an overseas absentee voter

    shall be done in person (Sec. 6, R.A. 9189,

    AbsenteeVotingLaw)

    Q:Howshallvotingbedone?

    A:

    1.

    The overseas absentee voter shall

    personally accomplish his/her ballot at

    theembassy,consulateorotherforeign

    service establishment that has

    jurisdiction over the country where

    he/she temporarily resides or at any

    pollingplacedesignatedandaccredited

    by theCommission. (Sec.16,R.A.9189

    AbsenteeVotingLaw)

    2. The overseas absentee voter may also

    vote

    by

    mail.(R.A.

    9189

    Absentee

    VotingLaw)

    Q:Whenmayvotingbymailbeallowed?

    A: Voting by mail may be allowed in countries

    thatsatisfythefollowingconditions:

    1. Wherethemailingsystemisfairlywell

    developed and secure to prevent the

    occasionoffraud

    2.

    Where there exists a technically

    established identification system that

    would

    preclude

    multiply

    or

    proxyvoting;and

    3. Where the system of reception and

    custody of mailed ballots in the

    embassies,consulatesandotherforeign

    service establishments concerned are

    adequateandwellsecured.

    Thereafter,votingbymail inanycountryshallbe

    allowed only upon review and approval of the

    Joint Congressional Oversight Committee. (Sec.

    17.1,R.A.No.9189AbsenteeVotingLaw)

    Q:How

    will

    the

    counting

    and

    canvassing

    of

    the

    votesbedone?

    A:

    1. It shall be conducted in the country

    wherethevoteswereactuallycast.The

    opening of the speciallymarked

    envelopes containing the ballots and

    the counting and canvassing of votes

    shallbeconductedwithinthepremises

    of theembassies,consulatesandother

    foreign service establishments or in

    suchotherplacesasmaybedesignated

    by the COMELEC pursuant to the

    Implementing Rules and Regulations.The COMELEC shall ensure that the

    start of counting in all polling places

    abroad shall be synchronized with the

    startofcountinginthePhilippines.

    2.

    The COMELEC shall constitute as many

    SpecialBoardsofElection Inspectorsas

    may be necessary to conduct and

    supervisethecountingofvotes.

    162POLITICALLAWTEAM:

    ADVISER:ATTY.EDWINREYSANDOVAL;SUBJECTHEAD:RACHELMARIE L.FELICES;ASST.SUBJECTHEADS:WIVINOE.BRACEROII&

    HERAZEUSCHRISTINEY.UY;MEMBERS:LAWRENCEPAULOH.AQUINO,LEANDRORODELV.ATIENZA,MARINETHEASTERAND.AYOS,

    CARLOR.BALA,WILFREDOT.BONILLA,JR.,KEELACHERNARR.DINOY,APRILV.ENRILE,KENNETHJAMESCARLOC.HIZON,JOSEMARIA

    G.MENDOZA,ROGERCHRISTOPHERR.REYES,ROMILINDAC.SIBAL,JASMINM.SISON,ZARAHPATRICIAT.SUAREZ,RALPHJULIOUSL.VILLAMOR.

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    7/25

    ELECTION LAW

    3. Immediately upon completion of the

    counting,theSpecialBoardsofElection

    Inspectors shall transmit via facsimile

    and/orelectronicmailtheresultstothe

    Commission in Manila and the

    accreditedmajor political parties. (Sec.

    18,R.A.9189AbsenteeVotingLaw)

    Q: Can the canvass of the overseas absentee

    votesdelaytheproclamationofwinners?

    A:No, if theoutcomeof theelectionwillnotbe

    affected by the results thereof.Notwithstanding

    the foregoing, the COMELEC is empowered to

    order the proclamation of winning candidates

    despite the fact that the scheduled electionhas

    not yet taken place in a particular country or

    countries, if theholdingofelections thereinhas

    beenrenderedimpossiblebyevents,factors,and

    circumstancespeculiar

    to

    such

    country

    or

    countries, and which events, factors and

    circumstances are beyond the control or

    influence of the COMELEC. (Sec. 18, RA 9189

    AbsenteeVotingLaw)

    Q: What kind of registration system do the

    Philippineshave?

    A:

    1. Continuing

    2. Computerized;and

    3.

    Permanent

    163UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

    F a c u l t a d d e D e r e c h o i v i l

    ACADEMICSCHAIR:LESTERJAYALANE.FLORESII

    VICECHAIRSFORACADEMICS:KARENJOYG.SABUGO&JOHNHENRYC.MENDOZA

    VICECHAIRFORADMINISTRATIONANDFINANCE:JEANELLEC.LEE

    VICECHAIRSFORLAYOUTANDDESIGN:EARLLOUIEM.MASACAYAN&THEENAC.MARTINEZ

    d.INCLUSIONANDEXCLUSIONPROCEEDINGS

    Q: Which court has jurisdiction over inclusion

    andexclusionproceedings?

    A:

    1. MTC originalandexclusive

    2. RTC appellatejurisdiction

    3. SC appellatejurisdiction over RTC on

    questionoflaw

    Q: Who may file a petition in an inclusion or

    exclusionproceedings?

    A:

    1.

    Inclusion

    a.

    Any private person whose application

    was disapproved by the Election

    RegistrationBoardorwhosenamewas

    strickenoutfromthelistofvoters

    b. COMELEC

    2. Exclusion

    a. Any registered voter in the city or

    municipality

    b.

    Representativeof

    political

    party

    c. Electionofficer

    d. COMELEC (BP 881 Omnibus Election

    Code)

    Q:What is theperiod for filingapetition inan

    inclusionorexclusionproceeding?

    A:

    1. Inclusion any day except 105 days

    before regular election or 75 days

    before a special election. (COMELEC

    Reso.No.8820)

    2.

    Exclusion anytime

    except

    100

    days

    before a regular election or 65 days

    before a special election. (COMELEC

    Reso.No.9021)

    Q: Do decisions in an inclusion or exclusion

    proceedingsacquirethenatureofresjudicata?

    A: No. The proceedings for the exclusion or

    inclusion of voters in the list of voters are

    summary in character. Except for the right to

    remain inthe listofvotersorforbeingexcluded

    therefromfortheparticularelectioninrelationto

    whichtheproceedingshadbeenheld,adecision

    in an exclusion or inclusion proceeding, even if

    final and unappealable, does not acquire the

    natureof resjudicata. In this sense, itdoesnot

    operateasabartoanyfurtheractionthataparty

    may takeconcerning the subjectpassedupon in

    theproceeding. Thus, adecision in anexclusion

    proceedingwould neither be conclusive on the

    voters political status, nor bar subsequent

    proceedings on his right to be registered as a

    voter in any other election. (Domino vs.

    COMELEC,G.R.No.134015,July19,1999)

    e.POLITICALPARTIES

    Q:Whatisapoliticalparty?

    A: A political party is any organized group of

    citizens advocating an ideology or platform,

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    8/25

    USTGOLDENNOTES2011

    principlesandpoliciesforthegeneralconductof

    government and which, as the most immediate

    means of securing their adoption, regularly

    nominatesandsupportscertainofitsleadersand

    membersascandidateinpublicoffice.

    164POLITICALLAWTEAM:

    ADVISER:ATTY.EDWINREYSANDOVAL;SUBJECTHEAD:RACHELMARIE L.FELICES;ASST.SUBJECTHEADS:WIVINOE.BRACEROII&

    HERAZEUSCHRISTINEY.UY;MEMBERS:LAWRENCEPAULOH.AQUINO,LEANDRORODELV.ATIENZA,MARINETHEASTERAND.AYOS,

    CARLOR.BALA,WILFREDOT.BONILLA,JR.,KEELACHERNARR.DINOY,APRILV.ENRILE,KENNETHJAMESCARLOC.HIZON,JOSEMARIA

    G.MENDOZA,ROGERCHRISTOPHERR.REYES,ROMILINDAC.SIBAL,JASMINM.SISON,ZARAHPATRICIAT.SUAREZ,RALPHJULIOUSL.VILLAMOR.

    Toacquirejuridicalpersonalityandtoentitleitto

    rightsandprivilegesgrantedtopoliticalparties,it

    mustberegisteredwithCOMELEC.(Sec.3(c),R.A.

    7941)

    Q:Whatisasectoralparty?

    A:Asectoralpartyreferstoanorganizedgroupof

    citizens belonging to any of the sectors

    enumerated in Section 5, RA 7941 whose

    principaladvocacypertainstothespecialinterest

    and concerns of their sector. (Sec. 3 (d), R.A.

    7941)

    Q:Whatisasectoralorganization?

    A: A sectoral organization refers to a group of

    citizens or a coalition of groups of citizens who

    sharesimilarphysicalattributesorcharacteristics,

    employment, interests or concerns. (Sec. 3 (e),

    R.A.7941)

    Q:What are thegrounds for therefusal and/or

    cancellationofregistrationofapoliticalparty?

    A:

    1.

    It is a religious sect or denomination,

    organization or association, organized

    forreligiouspurposes

    2. Itadvocatesviolenceorunlawfulmeans

    toseekitsgoal

    3.

    Itisaforeignpartyororganization

    4.

    It isreceivingsupport fromany foreign

    government, foreign political party,

    foundation, organization, whether

    directlyorthroughanyof itsofficersor

    members or indirectly through third

    parties

    for

    partisan

    election

    purposes

    5. It violates or fails to comply with laws,

    rulesorregulationsrelatingtoelections

    6. It declares untruthful statements in its

    petition

    7. Ithasceasedtoexistforatleastone(1)

    year;or

    8. It fails toparticipate in the last two (2)

    precedingelectionsorfailstoobtainat

    leasttwopercentum(2%)ofthevotes

    cast under the partylist system in the

    two (2) preceding elections for the

    constituency inwhich ithasregistered.

    (Sec.6, R.A.7941)

    f.CANDIDATES

    1.QualificationsofCandidates

    Q:WhatarethequalificationsforPresidentand

    VicePresidentofthePhilippines?

    A:

    1.

    NaturalborncitizenofthePhilippines

    2. Registeredvoter

    3. Abletoreadandwrite

    4.

    At least 40 years of age at the day of

    election

    5.

    Andaresident

    of

    the

    Philippines

    for

    at

    least ten years immediately preceding

    such election. (Sec. 63, B.P. No. 881

    OmnibusElectionCode)

    Q: What are the qualifications of elective local

    officials?

    A:

    1. MustbeacitizenofthePhilippines

    2. A registered voter in the barangay,

    municipality,city,orprovinceor, inthe

    case of a member of the sangguniang

    panlalawigan,sangguniang

    panlungsod,

    orsanggunianbayan,thedistrictwhere

    heintendstobeelected

    3.

    A resident therein for at least one (1)

    year immediately preceding the day of

    theelection

    4. And able to read and write Filipino or

    anyotherlocallanguageordialect.(Sec.

    39, R.A. No. 7160 Local Government

    CodeofthePhilippines)

    Q:Whatarethegroundsfordisqualificationofa

    candidate?

    A:

    1. Declared as incompetent or insane by

    competentauthority

    2. Convicted by final judgment for

    subversion, insurrection, rebellion, or

    any offense for which he has been

    sentenced to a penalty of 18 months

    imprisonment

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    9/25

    ELECTION LAW

    3. Convictedbyfinaljudgmentforacrime

    involvingmoralturpitude

    4. Election offenses under Sec. 68 of the

    OmnibusElectionCode

    5.

    Committing acts of terrorism to

    enhancecandidacy

    6. Spending in his election campaign an

    amountin

    excess

    of

    that

    allowed

    7.

    Soliciting, receiving,making prohibited

    contributions

    8.

    Not possessing qualifications and

    possessing disqualifications under the

    LocalGovernmentCode

    9. Sentenced by final judgment for an

    offenseinvolvingmoralturpitudeorfor

    an offense punishable by one year or

    moreofimprisonmentwithintwoyears

    afterservingsentence

    10. Removed from office as a result of an

    administrativecase

    11. Convicted by final judgment for

    violatingthe

    oath

    of

    allegiance

    to

    the

    Republic

    12. Dualcitizenship (morespecifically,dual

    allegiance)

    13. Fugitivesfromjusticeincriminalornon

    politicalcaseshereorabroad

    14. Permanent residents in a foreign

    countryorthosewhohaveacquiredthe

    right to reside abroad and continue to

    availofthesameright

    15.

    Insaneorfeebleminded

    16.

    Nuisancecandidate

    17.

    ViolationofSec.73OECwithregard to

    COC

    18.

    Violationof

    Sec.

    78:

    material

    misrepresentationintheCOC

    Note: When a candidate has not yet been

    disqualified by final judgment during the election

    day andwas voted for, the votes cast in his favor

    cannotbedeclaredstray.(Codillav.DeVenecia,G.R.

    No.150605,Dec.10,2002)

    165UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

    F a c u l t a d d e D e r e c h o i v i l

    ACADEMICSCHAIR:LESTERJAYALANE.FLORESII

    VICECHAIRSFORACADEMICS:KARENJOYG.SABUGO&JOHNHENRYC.MENDOZA

    VICECHAIRFORADMINISTRATIONANDFINANCE:JEANELLEC.LEE

    VICECHAIRSFORLAYOUTANDDESIGN:EARLLOUIEM.MASACAYAN&THEENAC.MARTINEZ

    2.FilingofCertificatesofCandidacy

    Q:

    What

    is

    a

    certificate

    of

    candidacy

    (CoC)?

    A: It is the formal manifestation to the whole

    worldofthecandidatespoliticalcreedor lackof

    politicalcreed.

    Note:ACOCmaybeamendedbeforetheelections,

    evenafterthedateofitsfiling

    Provisions of the election law on certificates of

    candidacy aremandatory in terms.However, after

    theelections,theyareregardedasdirectorysoasto

    giveeffecttothewilloftheelectorate.(SayaAngSr.

    v.COMELEC,G.R.No.155087,November28,2003)

    Q:What

    is

    the

    purpose

    of

    the

    law

    in

    requiring

    thefilingofcertificateofcandidacyandinfixing

    thetimelimittherefor?

    A:

    1.

    Toenable the voters to know, at least

    60daysbeforetheregularelection,the

    candidates amongwhom they have to

    choose,and

    2. To avoid confusion and inconvenience

    in the tabulation of the votes cast.

    (Miranda v. Abaya, G.R. No. 136351,

    July28,1999)

    Q:KaRogerwenttoLagunatofilehisCOC.The

    electionofficerrefusedtoreceiveKaRogersCoC

    because he seeks to achieve his goals through

    violence.Istherefusalvalid?

    A:No.Itistheministerialdutyonthepartofthe

    election officer to receive and acknowledge

    receipt of the CoC. The question ofwhether or

    not a person is disqualified belongs to another

    tribunalinanappropriatedisqualificationcase.

    Q: What is the effect of filing a certificate of

    candidacy on the tenure of incumbent

    governmentofficials?

    A:

    1. AppointiveofficialSec.66of theOEC

    provides that any person holding an

    appointive office or position, including

    activemembersoftheArmedForcesof

    the Philippines, and officers and

    employees in GOCCs, shall be

    considered ipso facto RESIGNED from

    his office upon the filing of his

    certificate of candidacy. Such

    resignationis

    irrevocable.

    2. Elective official No effect. The

    candidate shallcontinue toholdoffice,

    whetherheisrunningforthesameora

    different position. (Sec. 14, Fair

    ElectionsActexpressly repealedSec.67

    ofBP881)

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    10/25

    USTGOLDENNOTES2011

    Q:Dothedeemedresignedprovisionswhichare

    applicable to appointive officials and not with

    elective officials violate the equal protection

    clauseoftheconstitution?

    A: No. The legal dichotomy created by the

    Legislature isareasonableclassification,asthere

    are material and significant distinctions between

    thetwoclassesofofficials.Thisisbecauseelected

    publicofficials,bytheverynatureoftheiroffice,

    engage in partisan political activities almost all

    yearround,evenoutsideofthecampaignperiod.

    Politicalpartisanshipistheinevitableessenceofa

    political office, elective positions included. The

    equal protection of the law clause in the

    Constitution is not absolute, but is subject to

    reasonable classification. Substantial distinctions

    clearly exist between elective officials and

    appointive

    officials.

    The

    former

    occupy

    their

    officebyvirtueofthemandateoftheelectorate.

    They are elected to an office for a definite term

    and may be removed therefrom only upon

    stringent conditions. On the other hand,

    appointive officials hold their office by virtue of

    their designation thereto by an appointing

    authority. Some appointive officials hold their

    officeinapermanentcapacityandareentitledto

    security of tenure while others serve at the

    pleasure of the appointing authority. (Quinto v.

    COMELEC,Feb.22,2010,G.R.189698)

    Q:WhatisthedutyoftheCOMELECinreceiving

    CoCs?

    A:

    GR:WhenacandidatefileshisCOC,theCOMELEC

    hasaministerialdutytoreceiveandacknowledge

    itsreceiptpursuanttoSection76,oftheElection

    Code. The COMELEC may not, by itself, without

    the proper proceedings, deny due course to or

    cancel a COC filed in due form. (Luna vs.

    COMELEC,G.R.No.165983,April24,2007)

    XPN:

    1.

    Nuisance candidatesSec. 69 of the

    OEC

    2. Petitiontodenyduecourseortocancel

    aCOCSec.78oftheOEC

    166

    3. Filingofadisqualificationcaseonanyof

    thegroundsenumerated inSection68,

    OEC.

    Q:CanyouwithdrawtheCoC?

    A:Yes.ApersonwhohasfiledaCoCmay,priorto

    theelection,withdrawthesamebysubmittingto

    the office concerned (COMELEC) a written

    declaration under oath. (Sec. 73, Omnibus

    ElectionCode)

    Q:OnthelastdayoffilingaCoC,March31,Jose

    Monsale withdrew his CoC. April 1, campaign

    period started. On April 2, he wanted to run

    again so he filed a written declaration

    withdrawing his withdrawal. Is his act of

    withdrawingthewithdrawalvalid?

    A: No. The withdrawal of the withdrawal of the

    CoCmadeafterthelastdayoffilingisconsidered

    asfilingofanewCoC.Hence, itwasnotallowed

    since

    it

    was

    filed

    out

    of

    time.(Monsale

    v.

    Nico,

    G.R.No.L2539,May28,1949)

    Q: Explain the concept of substitution of

    candidacy.

    A:Ifafterthelastdayforthefilingofcertificates

    of candidacy, an official candidate of a political

    party:(1)dies,(2)withdrawsor is(3)disqualified

    for any causea person belonging to, and

    certified by, the same political party may file a

    certificateofcandidacynot laterthanmiddayof

    election

    day

    to

    replace

    the

    candidate

    who

    died,

    withdrew or was disqualified. (COMELEC Reso.

    No.9140)

    Note:However,nosubstitutionshallbeallowed forany

    independentcandidate.(Ibid.)

    Q:Whataretherequisitesforvalidsubstitution?

    A:

    GR:

    1. Thesubstitutemustbelongtothesame

    party2.

    The deceased, disqualified or

    withdrawn candidate must have duly

    file a valid certificate of candidacy.

    (Ibid.)

    XPN: Thisdoesnotincludethosecaseswherethe

    certificate of candidacy of the person to be

    substituted had been denied due course and

    canceled under Section 78 of the Omnibus

    POLITICALLAWTEAM:

    ADVISER:ATTY.EDWINREYSANDOVAL;SUBJECTHEAD:RACHELMARIE L.FELICES;ASST.SUBJECTHEADS:WIVINOE.BRACEROII&

    HERAZEUSCHRISTINEY.UY;MEMBERS:LAWRENCEPAULOH.AQUINO,LEANDRORODELV.ATIENZA,MARINETHEASTERAND.AYOS,

    CARLOR.BALA,WILFREDOT.BONILLA,JR.,KEELACHERNARR.DINOY,APRILV.ENRILE,KENNETHJAMESCARLOC.HIZON,JOSEMARIA

    G.MENDOZA,ROGERCHRISTOPHERR.REYES,ROMILINDAC.SIBAL,JASMINM.SISON,ZARAHPATRICIAT.SUAREZ,RALPHJULIOUSL.VILLAMOR.

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    11/25

    ELECTION LAW

    Election Code. While the law enumerated the

    occasion where a candidate may be validly

    substituted, there is no mention of the case

    where a candidate is excluded not only by

    disqualification but also by denial and

    cancellationofhiscertificateofcandidacy.(Ongv.

    Alegre,G.R.No.163295,January23,2006)

    Q:Whenmaysubstitutiontakeplace?

    A: Substitution can only take place on the first

    dayofcampaignperioduntilnot later thanmid

    dayofelectionday.(COMELECReso.No.9140)

    Q:Martin de Guzman diedwhile campaigning.

    Hissonsubstitutedhim.Votersonthedayofthe

    election wrote Martin de Guzman instead of

    castingthesameinthenameofhisson,Joelde

    Guzman.Shouldthevotesbecountedinfavorof

    Joel?

    A: Yes. As a general rule, the same will be

    considered as stray votes butwillnot invalidate

    thewholeballot.Exceptioniswhenthesubstitute

    carriesthesamefamilyname.(Sec.12, R.A9006)

    Q: In the1998election,MayorMirandaalready

    served 8 consecutive terms, yet he still filed a

    CoC. As a result, Abaya filed a disqualification

    case. COMELEC then disqualified Miranda and

    cancelled his CoC. The son of Miranda, Joel,

    uponnomination

    of

    their

    political

    party,

    filed

    a

    certificateofsubstitute.JoelMirandawon.Was

    thesubstitutionvalid?

    A:Therewasnovalidsubstitution.COMELECdid

    notonlydisqualifyMirandabutalsocancelledhis

    CoC.Therefore,hecannotbevalidlysubstituted.

    Adisqualifiedcandidatemayonlybesubstituted

    ifhehad a valid CoC because if thedisqualified

    candidate did not have a valid and seasonably

    filed CoC, he is andwas not a candidate at all.

    (Miranda v. Abaya, G.R. No. 136351, July 28,

    1999)

    Q:Sincetherewasnovalidsubstitution,should

    thecandidatewhoobtained thesecondhighest

    votebeproclaimed?Whowill thenassume the

    positionofmayorship?

    167

    A: No. Under the doctrine on the rejection of

    secondplacer,thesecondplacerisjustlikethat

    second placer. He was not the choice of the

    electorate. The wreath of victory cannot be

    transferredtotherepudiatedloser.Followingthe

    ruleon succession, it is theViceMayorwhowill

    assume the position of mayorship. (Cayat v.

    COMELEC,G.R.No.163776,Apr.24,2010)

    Q: What is the effect of reacquisition of

    Philippine citizenship as to the

    domicile/residencerequirementforrunningasa

    mayoraltycandidate?

    A: Reacquisition of Philippine citizenship under

    R.A.9225hasnoautomaticimpactoreffectona

    candidatesresidence/domicile.Hemerelyhasan

    option to again establish his domicile in the

    municipality,which place shall become his new

    domicile of choice. The length of his residence

    thereinshall

    be

    determined

    from

    the

    time

    he

    made it his domicile of choice and it shall not

    retroact to the time of his birth. (Japson v.

    COMELEC,G.R.No.180088,Jan.19,2009)

    Q:Mayasecondplacerbedeclaredelected?

    A:

    GR:No.

    XPN:

    1. If the one who obtained the highest

    number

    of

    votes

    is

    disqualified

    and

    2. Theelectorateisfullyawareinfactand

    inlawofthecandidatesdisqualification

    so as to bring such awareness within

    the realm of notoriety but would

    nonethelesscast theirvotes infavorof

    the ineligible candidate. (Grego v.

    COMELEC, G. R. No. 125955,June 19,

    1997)

    Q:What istheeffectoffilingtwocertificatesof

    candidacy?

    A: Filing of two (2) certificates of candidacy

    disqualifies the person to run for both elective

    positions. (Sec. 73, B.P. 881 Omnibus Election

    Code)

    Q: Who may be considered a nuisance

    candidate?

    UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

    F a c u l t a d d e D e r e c h o i v i l

    ACADEMICSCHAIR:LESTERJAYALANE.FLORESII

    VICECHAIRSFORACADEMICS:KARENJOYG.SABUGO&JOHNHENRYC.MENDOZA

    VICECHAIRFORADMINISTRATIONANDFINANCE:JEANELLEC.LEE

    VICECHAIRSFORLAYOUTANDDESIGN:EARLLOUIEM.MASACAYAN&THEENAC.MARTINEZ

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    12/25

    USTGOLDENNOTES2011

    A: They are candidates who have no bona fide

    intentiontorun fortheofficeforwhichtheCOC

    has been filed and would thus prevent a faithful

    election.Anduponshowingthat:

    1.

    Saidcertificatehasbeenfiledtoputthe

    election

    process

    in

    mockery

    or

    disrepute

    2. Tocauseconfusionamongthevotersby

    the similarity of the names of the

    registeredcandidates;or

    3. By other circumstances or acts which

    demonstrate that a candidate has no

    bonafideintentiontorunfortheoffice

    for which his certificate of candidacy

    has been filed and thus prevent a

    faithfuldeterminationofthetruewillof

    the electorate. (Tajanan v. COMELEC,

    G.R.No.104443,Apr.13,1992)

    TheCOMELECmay,motupropriooruponverified

    petitionofaninterestedparty,refusetogivedue

    course to or cancel a certificate of candidacy

    uponshowingoftheabovestatedcircumstances.

    (Sec.69,B.P.881OmnibusElectionCode)

    Q:AandBwere theonlycandidates formayor

    of Bigaa, Bulacan in the May 1995 local

    elections. A obtained 10,000 votes as against

    3,000 votes for B. In the same elections, X got

    the highest number of votes among the

    candidates for the Sangguniang Bayan of the

    same town. A died the day before his

    proclamation.

    1.

    Who should the Board of Canvassers

    proclaim as elected mayor, A, B or X?

    Explain.

    168POLITICALLAWTEAM:

    ADVISER:ATTY.EDWINREYSANDOVAL;SUBJECTHEAD:RACHELMARIE L.FELICES;ASST.SUBJECTHEADS:WIVINOE.BRACEROII&

    HERAZEUSCHRISTINEY.UY;MEMBERS:LAWRENCEPAULOH.AQUINO,LEANDRORODELV.ATIENZA,MARINETHEASTERAND.AYOS,

    CARLOR.BALA,WILFREDOT.BONILLA,JR.,KEELACHERNARR.DINOY,APRILV.ENRILE,KENNETHJAMESCARLOC.HIZON,JOSEMARIA

    G.MENDOZA,ROGERCHRISTOPHERR.REYES,ROMILINDAC.SIBAL,JASMINM.SISON,ZARAHPATRICIAT.SUAREZ,RALPHJULIOUSL.VILLAMOR.

    2.

    Who is entitled to discharge the functions

    oftheofficeofthemayor,BorX?Explain.

    A: It is A who should be proclaimed as winner,

    because he was the one who obtained the

    highest number of votes for the position of

    mayor,

    but

    a

    notation

    should

    be

    made

    that

    he

    died for the purpose of applying the rule on

    successiontooffice.

    1. B cannot be proclaimed, because the

    death of the candidate who obtained

    the highest number of votes does not

    entitle thecandidatewhoobtainedthe

    next highest number of votes to be

    proclaimed the winner, since he was

    notthechoiceoftheelectorate.Xisnot

    entitled to be proclaimed elected as

    mayor, because he ran for the

    SangguniangBayan.

    2. NeitherBnorX isentitledtodischarge

    thefunctions

    of

    the

    office

    of

    mayor.

    B

    is

    not entitled to discharge the office of

    mayor, since he was defeated in the

    election. X is not entitled to discharge

    theofficeofmayor.UnderSection44of

    the Local Government Code, it is the

    vicemayorwhoshouldsucceed incase

    of permanent vacancy in the office of

    themayor. It isonly when theposition

    ofthevicemayorisalsovacantthatthe

    memberoftheSangguniangBayanwho

    obtained the highest number of votes

    will succeed to the office of mayor.

    (Benito v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 106053

    Aug.17,

    1994)

    Q:Whencanapersonfileapetitiontodenydue

    coursetoorcancelacertificateofcandidacy?

    A:Averifiedpetitionseekingtodenyduecourse

    ortocancelacertificateofcandidacymaybefiled

    bythepersonexclusivelyonthegroundthatany

    material representation contained therein as

    required under Section 74 of the Omnibus

    ElectionCodeisfalse.Thepetitionmaybefiledat

    anytimenotlaterthantwentyfive(25)daysfrom

    the

    time

    of

    the

    filing

    of

    the

    certificate

    of

    candidacy and shall be decided, after due notice

    and hearing, not later than fifteen days before

    theelection.

    g.CAMPAIGN

    1.PrematureCampaigning

    Q:Whatisanelectioncampaign?

    A: It refers to an act designed to promote the

    election or defeat of a particular candidate or

    candidatestoapublicofficewhichshallinclude:

    1.

    Forming organizations, associations,

    clubs, committees or other groups of

    persons for the purpose of soliciting

    votesand/orundertakinganycampaign

    fororagainstacandidate

    2.

    Holdingpoliticalcaucuses,conferences,

    meetings, rallies, parades, or other

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    13/25

    ELECTION LAW

    similar assemblies, for the purpose of

    solicitingvotesand/orundertakingany

    campaignorpropaganda fororagainst

    acandidate

    3.

    Making speeches, announcements or

    commentaries,orholdinginterviewsfor

    oragainsttheelectionofanycandidate

    forpublic

    office

    4.

    Publishing or distributing campaign

    literature or materials designed to

    support or oppose the election of any

    candidate;or

    5. Directly or indirectly soliciting votes,

    pledges or support for or against a

    candidate (Sec. 79, B.P. 881 Omnibus

    ElectionCode).

    Note: The foregoing enumerated acts ifperformed

    for the purpose of enhancing the chances of

    aspirants for nomination for candidacy to a public

    office

    by

    a

    political

    party,

    aggroupment,

    or

    coalition

    of parties shall not be considered as election

    campaignorpartisanelectionactivity.

    Public expressions or opinions or discussions of

    probable issues in a forthcoming election or on

    attributes of or criticisms against probable

    candidates proposed to be nominated in a

    forthcoming political party convention shall not be

    construed as part of any election campaign or

    partisan political activity contemplated under the

    OEC.(Sec.79,B.P.881OmnibusElectionCode)

    Q:Discuss

    the

    period

    of

    campaign

    A:

    1. Presidential and Vice presidential

    election90days;

    2. Election of members of the Congress

    andlocalelection45days;

    3. BarangayElection15days

    4.

    SpecialelectionunderArt.VIII,Sec.5(2)

    oftheConstitution45days

    Note: The campaign periods shall not include the

    daybeforeandthedayoftheelection(Sec.3OEC)

    Q: What is the rule against premature

    campaigning?

    A:Itshallbeunlawfulforanyperson,whetheror

    not a voter or candidate, or for any party, or

    association of persons, to engage in an election

    campaign or partisan political activity except

    duringthecampaignperiod.(Sec.80,B.P.881).

    Theuseof lawfulelectionpropagandaunderthe

    FairElectionsActissubjecttothesupervisionand

    regulation by the COMELEC in order to prevent

    prematurecampaigningandtoequalize,asmuch

    as practicable, the situation of all candidatesby

    preventing popular and rich candidates from

    gainingundue

    advantage

    in

    exposure

    and

    publicity on account of their resources and

    popularity.(Chavezv.COMELEC,G.R.No.162777,

    August31,2004)

    Q. Petitioner Penera and respondent Andanar

    ranformayorofSta.Monica,SurigaoDelNorte

    during the May 14, 2007 elections. Peneras

    political party held amotorcade preceding the

    filingofhercertificateofcandidacyannouncing

    her candidacy for mayor. Because of this,

    AndanarfiledapetitiontodisqualifyPenerafor

    engagingin

    premature

    campaigning

    in

    violation

    ofSec.80and68of theOmnibusElectionCode.

    Does the act of campaigning for votes

    immediatelyprecedingthefilingofcertificateof

    candidacy violate the prohibition against

    prematurecampaigning?

    A.Thecampaignperiodforlocalofficialsbeginon

    30March2007andendson12May2007.Penera

    filed her certificate of candidacy on 29 March

    2007.Penerawas thusacandidateon29March

    2009 only for purposes of printing the ballots

    underSec.11

    of

    R.A.

    8436.On

    29

    March

    2007,

    the

    law stilldidnot considerPeneraa candidate for

    purposesother than theprintingofballots.Acts

    committedbyPenerapriorto30March2007,the

    date when she became a "candidate," even if

    constituting election campaigning or partisan

    political activities, are not punishable under

    Section 80 of theOmnibus Election Code. Such

    actsarewithin therealmofacitizensprotected

    freedomofexpression.ActscommittedbyPenera

    within the campaign period are not covered by

    Section 80 as Section 80 punishes only acts

    outsidethe

    campaign

    period.

    Inlaymanslanguage,thismeansthatacandidate

    isliableforanelectionoffenseonlyforactsdone

    during thecampaignperiod,notbefore.The law

    is clear as daylight any election offense that

    may be committed by a candidate under any

    election law cannot be committed before the

    169

    UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

    F a c u l t a d d e D e r e c h o i v i l

    ACADEMICSCHAIR:LESTERJAYALANE.FLORESII

    VICECHAIRSFORACADEMICS:KARENJOYG.SABUGO&JOHNHENRYC.MENDOZA

    VICECHAIRFORADMINISTRATIONANDFINANCE:JEANELLEC.LEE

    VICECHAIRSFORLAYOUTANDDESIGN:EARLLOUIEM.MASACAYAN&THEENAC.MARTINEZ

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    14/25

    USTGOLDENNOTES2011

    170POLITICALLAWTEAM:

    ADVISER:ATTY.EDWINREYSANDOVAL;SUBJECTHEAD:RACHELMARIE L.FELICES;ASST.SUBJECTHEADS:WIVINOE.BRACEROII&

    HERAZEUSCHRISTINEY.UY;MEMBERS:LAWRENCEPAULOH.AQUINO,LEANDRORODELV.ATIENZA,MARINETHEASTERAND.AYOS,

    CARLOR.BALA,WILFREDOT.BONILLA,JR.,KEELACHERNARR.DINOY,APRILV.ENRILE,KENNETHJAMESCARLOC.HIZON,JOSEMARIA

    G.MENDOZA,ROGERCHRISTOPHERR.REYES,ROMILINDAC.SIBAL,JASMINM.SISON,ZARAHPATRICIAT.SUAREZ,RALPHJULIOUSL.VILLAMOR.

    start of the campaign period. (Penera v.

    COMELEC,G.R.No.181613,Nov.25,2009)

    Q: When can a person be considered a

    candidate?

    A: A candidate refers to any person aspiring for

    orseekinganelectivepublicoffice,whohasfiled

    acertificateofcandidacybyhimselforthroughan

    accredited political party, aggroupment or

    coalition of parties. However, it is no longer

    enough to merely file a certificate of candidacy

    for a person to be considered a candidate

    because "any person who files his certificate of

    candidacy within the filing period shall only be

    considered a candidate at the start of the

    campaignperiodforwhichhefiledhiscertificate

    of candidacy." Any person may thus file a

    certificate

    of

    candidacy

    on

    any

    day

    within

    the

    prescribed period for filing a certificate of

    candidacy yet that person shall be considered a

    candidate, for purposes of determining ones

    possible violations of election laws, only during

    the campaign period. (Penera v. COMELEC,G.R.

    No.181613,Nov.25,2009)

    2.ProhibitedContributions

    Q: What are considered as lawful election

    propaganda?

    A:

    1.

    Written printed materials (does not

    exceed8in.widthby14in.length)

    2.

    Handwritten/printedletters

    3. Posters (not exceeding 2 x 3 ft.).

    However, a public meeting or rally, at

    thesiteandontheoccasionofapublic

    meeting or rally, may be displayed five

    (5) days before the date of rally but

    shallberemovedwithin24hoursafter

    saidrally

    4.

    Printads

    page

    in

    broadsheets

    and

    page in tabloids thrice a week per

    newspaper, magazine or other

    publicationduringthecampaignperiod;

    5. Broadcastmedia(i.e.TVandradio)

    6. All other forms of election propaganda

    notprohibitedbytheOmnibusElection

    CodeorthisAct.(Sec.3,R.A.No.9006)

    ALLOWABLECOMELECAIRTIMEFORCANDIDATES

    (FairElectionsAct)

    NATIONALPOSITIONS LOCAL

    POSITIONS

    120minutesforTV 60minutesforTV

    180minutesforradio 90minutesforradio

    Note: COMELEC cannot compel newspapers of

    general circulation to donate free print space as

    COMELEC space without payment of just

    compensation. Suchcompulsionamounts to taking;

    hence,itisanexerciseofeminentdomainandnotof

    policepower (PhilippinePress Institutev.COMELEC,

    G.R.No.119694,May22,1995).Thepaymentofjust

    compensation isnowexpressly providedundersec.

    7oftheFairElectionsAct.

    However,allbroadcastingstations,whetherbyradio

    or television stations, which are licensed by the

    government, do not own the airways and

    frequencies; they are merely given the temporary

    privilege of using them. A franchise is a privilege

    subjecttoamendment,andtheprovisionofBP881

    granting free airtime to the COMELEC is an

    amendmentof the franchiseofradioand television

    stations (Telecommunications and Broadcast

    Attorneys of the Philippines v. COMELEC, G.R. No.

    132922, Apr. 21, 1998). Payment of just

    compensation is not necessary since it is a valid

    exerciseofpolicepower.

    Q:A

    COMELEC

    resolution

    provides

    that

    political

    parties supporting a common set of candidates

    shallbeallowedtopurchasejointlyairtimeand

    the aggregate amount of advertising space

    purchased for campaign purposes shall not

    exceedthatallottedtootherpoliticalpartiesor

    groups that nominated only one set of

    candidates. The resolution is challenged as a

    violation of the freedom of speech and of the

    press. Is the resolution constitutionally

    defensible?Explain.

    A:

    Yes,

    the

    resolution

    is

    constitutionally

    defensible. Under Sec. 4, Art. IXC of the 1987

    Constitution, during the election period the

    COMELECmaysuperviseorregulatethemediaof

    communication or information to ensure equal

    opportunity, time, and space among candidates

    with the objective of holding free, orderly,

    honest,peaceful,andcredibleelections.Toallow

    candidateswhoaresupportedbymorethanone

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    15/25

    ELECTION LAW

    political party to purchase more air time and

    advertising space than candidates supported by

    onepoliticalpartyonlywilldeprive the latterof

    equaltimeandspaceinthemedia.

    Alternative Answer: No. Although the

    expenditurelimitation

    applies

    only

    to

    the

    purchaseofairtime,thusleavingpoliticalparties

    free to spend for other forms of campaign, the

    limitation nonetheless results in a direct and

    substantial reduction of the quantity of political

    speech by restricting the number of issues that

    can be discussed, the depth of their discussion

    andthesizeoftheaudiencethatcanbereached,

    throughthebroadcastmedia.

    SincethepurposeoftheFreeSpeechClauseisto

    promote the widest possible dissemination of

    information,and

    the

    reality

    is

    that

    to

    do

    this

    requires the expenditure ofmoney, a limitation

    on expenditure for this purpose cannot be

    justified,not even for the purpose ofequalizing

    theopportunityofpoliticalcandidates. (Gonzalez

    v.COMELEC,G.R.No.L28783,Apr.18,1969)

    Q:Whatare includedaselectoral contributions

    andexpenditures?

    A:

    1.

    Agift

    2.

    Donation

    3.

    Subscription

    4. Loan

    5. Advance or deposit of money or

    anythingofvalue

    6. A contract, promise or agreement of

    contribution, whether or not legally

    enforceable

    7. Use of facilities voluntarily donated by

    other persons, the money value of

    which can be assessed based on the

    ratesprevailinginthearea

    8. Madeforthepurposeofinfluencingthe

    resultsoftheelections

    Note: Does not include services rendered without

    compensationby individuals volunteeringaportion

    or all of their time in behalf of a candidate or

    politicalparty.(Sec.94,OEC)

    171

    Q:Whatareprohibitedcontributions?

    A:Thosemadedirectlyorindirectlybyanyofthe

    following:

    1. Public or private financial institutions

    (except loanstoacandidateorpolitical

    party)

    2. Public utilities or those exploiting

    naturalresourcesofthenation

    3.

    Persons with contracts to supply thegovernmentwith goods or services or

    toperformconstructionorotherworks

    4. Grantees of franchises, incentives,

    exemptions, allocations, or similar

    privileges or concessions by the

    government

    5.

    Personswho,within one year prior to

    the date of the election, have been

    grantedloansorotheraccommodations

    in excess of P100,000 by the

    government

    6.

    Educational institutions which have

    receivedgrantsofpublicfundsnot less

    thanP100,000

    7. Officials or employees in the Civil

    Service or members of the Armed

    ForcesofthePhilippines;and

    8.

    Foreigners and foreign corporations.

    (Sec. 95, B.P. 881 Omnibus Election

    Code)

    Q:Whatareprohibitedmeansofraisingfunds?

    A:

    1.

    Holdinganyofthefollowingactivities:

    a. Dances

    b.

    Lotteries

    c. Cockfights

    d.

    Games

    e.

    Boxingbouts

    f.

    Bingo

    g.

    Beautycontests

    h. Entertainments

    i. Cinematographic, theatrical,

    orotherperformancesforthe

    purpose of raising funds for

    an election campaign or for

    the support of any candidate

    from the commencement of

    the election period up to an

    electionday.

    2.

    Itshallalsobeunlawful foranyperson

    ororganization to solicitand/oraccept

    fromanycandidateforpublicofficeany

    gift, food, transportation, contribution

    ordonation incashor inkindformthe

    commencement of the election period

    and including election day, except

    UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

    F a c u l t a d d e D e r e c h o i v i l

    ACADEMICSCHAIR:LESTERJAYALANE.FLORESII

    VICECHAIRSFORACADEMICS:KARENJOYG.SABUGO&JOHNHENRYC.MENDOZA

    VICECHAIRFORADMINISTRATIONANDFINANCE:JEANELLEC.LEE

    VICECHAIRSFORLAYOUTANDDESIGN:EARLLOUIEM.MASACAYAN&THEENAC.MARTINEZ

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    16/25

    USTGOLDENNOTES2011

    normal and customary religious

    stipends,tithes,orcollections.(Sec.97,

    OEC)

    Q:Whatarelawfulexpenditures?

    A:

    1. Fortravelingexpenses

    2. Compensation of campaigners, clerks,

    stenographers, messengers and other

    persons actually employed in the

    campaign

    3. Telegraphandtelephonetolls,postage,

    freightandexpressdeliverycharges

    4. Stationery, printing and distribution of

    printedmattersrelativetocandidacy

    5. Employmentofwatchersatthepolls

    6.

    Rent, maintenance and furnishing of

    campaign headquarters, office or place

    ofmeetings

    7.

    Politicalmeetings

    or

    rallies

    8. Advertisements

    9.

    Employment of counsel, the cost of

    whichshallnotbetakenintoaccountin

    determining the amount of expenses

    whichacandidateorpoliticalpartymay

    haveincurred

    10. Copying and classifying list of voters,

    investigating and challenging the right

    tovoteofpersonsregisteredinthelists,

    thecostofwhichshallnotbetakeninto

    account in determining the amount of

    expenseswhichacandidateorpolitical

    partymayhaveincurred

    11.

    Printing

    sample

    ballots,

    the

    cost

    of

    whichshallnotbetakenintoaccountin

    determining the amount of expenses

    whichacandidateorpoliticalpartymay

    have incurred. (Sec. 102, B.P. 881

    OmnibusElectionCode)

    172POLITICALLAWTEAM:

    ADVISER:ATTY.EDWINREYSANDOVAL;SUBJECTHEAD:RACHELMARIE L.FELICES;ASST.SUBJECTHEADS:WIVINOE.BRACEROII&

    HERAZEUSCHRISTINEY.UY;MEMBERS:LAWRENCEPAULOH.AQUINO,LEANDRORODELV.ATIENZA,MARINETHEASTERAND.AYOS,

    CARLOR.BALA,WILFREDOT.BONILLA,JR.,KEELACHERNARR.DINOY,APRILV.ENRILE,KENNETHJAMESCARLOC.HIZON,JOSEMARIA

    G.MENDOZA,ROGERCHRISTOPHERR.REYES,ROMILINDAC.SIBAL,JASMINM.SISON,ZARAHPATRICIAT.SUAREZ,RALPHJULIOUSL.VILLAMOR.

    Q:Whatarethe limitationsonexpensesforthe

    candidatesandpoliticalparties?

    A:

    1.

    Forcandidates

    a.

    President and VicePresident

    P10/voter

    b. Other candidates, ifwithparty

    P3/voter

    c. Othercandidates,ifwithoutparty

    P5/voter

    2. For political parties P5/voter

    (COMELECResolutionNo.8758)

    Q: What is a statement of contribution and

    expenses?

    A: Every candidate and treasurer of the political

    party shall, within 30 days after the day of the

    election, file in duplicate with the offices of the

    COMELEC, the full, true and itemized statement

    of all contributions and expenditures in

    connectionwiththeelection.(Sec.14,R.A.7166)

    Q:Istheconductofelectionsurveyprohibited?

    A: No. The SC held that Sec. 5.4 of the Fair

    Election Act prohibiting publication of survey

    results15days immediatelyprecedinganational

    election and 7 days before a local election

    violates the constitutional rights of speech,

    expressionandthepressbecause:

    1. It imposes a prior restraint on the

    freedomofexpression

    2. It is a direct and total suppressionof a

    categoryofexpressionandeventhough

    such suppression is only for a limited

    period;and

    3. Thegovernmentalinterestsoughttobe

    promoted can be achieved by means

    other than thesuppression of freedom

    of expression (SWS v. COMELEC, G.R.

    No.147571,May5,2001)

    h.BOARDOFCANVASSERS

    Q: What is the composition of the Board of

    Canvassers(BoC)?

    A:

    1. Provincial board of canvassers the

    provincial board of canvassers shall be

    composed of the provincial election

    supervisor or a senior lawyer in the

    regional office of the Commission, as

    chairman,

    the

    provincial

    fiscal,

    as

    vice

    chairman, and the provincial

    superintendent of schools, and one

    representative from each of the ruling

    party and the dominant opposition

    political party in the constituency

    concerned entitled to be represented,

    asmembers.

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    17/25

    ELECTION LAW

    2. Cityboardofcanvassers thecityboard

    ofcanvassersshallbecomposedofthe

    cityelectionregistraroralawyerofthe

    Commission,aschairman,thecityfiscal

    and thecity superintendentofschools,

    and one representative from each of

    theruling

    party

    and

    the

    dominant

    oppositionpoliticalpartyentitled tobe

    represented,asmembers.

    3. District board of canvassers of

    MetropolitanManila thedistrictboard

    of canvassers shall be composed of a

    lawyeroftheCommission,aschairman,

    and a ranking fiscal in the district and

    the most senior district school

    supervisor in the district to be

    appointed upon consultation with the

    Ministryof

    Justice

    and

    the

    Ministry

    of

    Education, Culture and Sports,

    respectively, and one representative

    from each of the ruling party and the

    dominant opposition political party in

    the constituency concerned, as

    members.

    173UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

    F a c u l t a d d e D e r e c h o i v i l

    ACADEMICSCHAIR:LESTERJAYALANE.FLORESII

    VICECHAIRSFORACADEMICS:KARENJOYG.SABUGO&JOHNHENRYC.MENDOZA

    VICECHAIRFORADMINISTRATIONANDFINANCE:JEANELLEC.LEE

    VICECHAIRSFORLAYOUTANDDESIGN:EARLLOUIEM.MASACAYAN&THEENAC.MARTINEZ

    4. Municipal board of canvassers the

    municipal board of canvassers shallbe

    composedoftheelectionregistrarora

    representative of the Commission, as

    chairman,the

    municipal

    treasurer,

    and

    thedistrictsupervisoror inhisabsence

    any public school principal in the

    municipality and one representative

    from each of the ruling party and the

    dominant opposition political party

    entitled to be represented, as

    members.

    5. Board of canvassersfor newly created

    political subdivisions the Commission

    shall constitute a board of canvassers

    andappoint

    the

    members

    thereof

    for

    the first election in a newly created

    province,cityormunicipalityincasethe

    officials who shall act as members

    thereof have not yet assumed their

    dutiesandfunctions(Sec.221,B.P.881)

    Q: Who has supervision and control over the

    boardofcanvassers?

    A:TheCommission shallhavedirect controland

    supervision over the board of canvassers. Any

    memberof theboardof canvassersmay,atany

    time,berelievedforcauseandsubstitutedmotu

    propriobytheCommission.(Sec.227.,B.P.881)

    Q: What is the manner of delivery and

    transmittalofelectionreturns?

    A:

    CityandMunicipalBoardof

    Canvassers

    Provincialand

    DistrictBoardsof

    Canvassersin

    Metropolitan

    Manila

    the copy of the election

    returns,dulyplaced insidea

    sealed envelope signed and

    affixed with the imprint of

    thethumboftherighthand

    of all the members of the

    boardofelectioninspectors,

    shallbepersonallydelivered

    by the members of the

    boardofelection inspectors

    to the city or municipal

    board of canvassers under

    proper receipt to be signed

    byallthemembersthereof.

    the copy of the

    electionreturnsshall

    be personally

    delivered by the

    members of the

    board of election

    inspectors to the

    election registrar for

    transmittal to the

    proper board of

    canvassers under

    proper receipt tobe

    signed by all the

    membersthereof.

    Theelection

    registrar

    concerned

    shall

    place

    all

    thereturns intendedfor theboardofcanvassers

    insideaballotboxprovidedwith threepadlocks

    whosekeys shallbe keptas follows:oneby the

    election registrar, anotherby the representative

    of the ruling party and the third by the

    representative of the dominant political

    oppositionparty.(Sec.229,B.P.881)

    Q: How will the safekeeping of transmitted

    electionreturnsbedone?

    A:The

    board

    of

    canvassers

    shall

    keep

    the

    ballot

    boxes containing the election returns in a safe

    and secure room before and after the canvass.

    Thedoortotheroommustbepadlockedbythree

    lockswiththekeysthereofkeptasfollows:

    1. Onewiththechairman,

    2. The other with the representative of

    therulingparty,

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    18/25

    USTGOLDENNOTES2011

    3. And the other with the representative

    of the dominant opposition political

    party.

    The watchers of candidates, political parties,

    coalition of political parties and organization

    collectively

    authorized

    by

    the

    Commission

    to

    appointwatchersshallhavetherighttoguardthe

    room. Violation of this right shall constitute an

    election offense. (Sec. 230, B.P. 881 Omnibus

    ElectionCode)

    Q: How will the canvassing by the board be

    done?

    A:

    1. Theboardofcanvassersshallmeetnot

    laterthansixo'clockintheafternoonof

    election

    day

    at

    the

    place

    designated

    by

    the Commission toreceive theelection

    returns and to immediately canvass

    those that may have already been

    received.

    2. It shall meet continuously from day to

    dayuntilthecanvass iscompleted,and

    mayadjournbutonlyforthepurposeof

    awaiting the other election returns

    from other polling places within its

    jurisdiction.

    3.

    Each

    time

    the

    board

    adjourns,

    it

    shall

    makea totalofall thevotescanvassed

    so far for each candidate for each

    office, furnishing the Commission in

    Manila by the fastest means of

    communicationacertifiedcopythereof,

    and making available the data

    contained therein to the mass media

    andotherinterestedparties.

    4.

    As soon as the other election returns

    are delivered, the board shall

    immediatelyresumecanvassinguntilall

    thereturnshavebeencanvassed.

    5.

    Therespectiveboardofcanvassersshall

    prepare a certificate of canvass duly

    signed and affixed with the imprint of

    the thumb of the right hand of each

    member, supported by a statement of

    thevotesreceivedbyeachcandidatein

    each polling place and, on the basis

    thereof, shall proclaim as elected the

    candidates who obtained the highest

    number of votes cast in the province,

    city,municipalityorbarangay(Sec.231,

    B.P.881).

    Note: Failure tocomplywith this requirementshall

    constituteanelectionoffense.

    Subject to reasonable exceptions, the board of

    canvassers must complete their canvass within

    thirtysixhoursinmunicipalities,fortyeighthoursin

    citiesandseventytwohours in provinces.Violation

    hereofshallbeanelectionoffense.

    WithrespecttotheelectionforPresidentandVice

    President, the provincial and city boards of

    canvassersshallprepareinquintuplicateacertificate

    of canvass supported by a statement of votes

    receivedbyeachcandidateineachpollingplaceand

    transmitthefirstcopythereoftotheSpeakerofthe

    Batasang

    Pambansa.

    The

    second

    copy

    shall

    be

    transmittedtotheCommission,thethirdcopyshall

    bekeptbytheprovincialelectionsupervisororcity

    electionregistrar; the fourthandthefifthcopies to

    each of the two accredited political parties.

    (Agujetasv.CA,G.R.No.106560,August23,1996)

    Q: Who are not allowed inside the canvassing

    room?

    A:

    1. Any officer or member of the Armed

    Forces of the Philippines, including the

    Philippine Constabulary, or the

    IntegratedNationalPolice

    2. Any peace officer or any armed or

    unarmedpersonsbelongingtoanextra

    police agency, special forces, reaction

    forces, strike forces, home defense

    forces, barangay selfdefense units,

    barangaytanod

    3. Any member of the security or police

    organizationsofgovernmentministries,

    commissions,councils,bureaus,offices,

    instrumentalities,

    or

    governmentowned or controlled corporations or

    theirsubsidiaries

    4.

    Any member of a privately owned or

    operated security, investigative,

    protective or intelligence agency

    performingidenticalorsimilarfunctions

    toentertheroomwherethecanvassing

    of the election returns are held by the

    174POLITICALLAWTEAM:

    ADVISER:ATTY.EDWINREYSANDOVAL;SUBJECTHEAD:RACHELMARIE L.FELICES;ASST.SUBJECTHEADS:WIVINOE.BRACEROII&

    HERAZEUSCHRISTINEY.UY;MEMBERS:LAWRENCEPAULOH.AQUINO,LEANDRORODELV.ATIENZA,MARINETHEASTERAND.AYOS,

    CARLOR.BALA,WILFREDOT.BONILLA,JR.,KEELACHERNARR.DINOY,APRILV.ENRILE,KENNETHJAMESCARLOC.HIZON,JOSEMARIA

    G.MENDOZA,ROGERCHRISTOPHERR.REYES,ROMILINDAC.SIBAL,JASMINM.SISON,ZARAHPATRICIAT.SUAREZ,RALPHJULIOUSL.VILLAMOR.

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    19/25

    ELECTION LAW

    boardofcanvassersandwithinaradius

    of fifty meters from such room. (Sec.

    232,B.P.881OmnibusElectionCode)

    Note:Theboardofcanvassersbyamajorityvote,if

    itdeemsnecessary,maymake a call inwriting for

    the detail of policemen or any peace officers for

    theirprotectionorfortheprotectionoftheelection

    documents and paraphernalia in the possession of

    the board, or for the maintenance of peace and

    order, in which case said policemen or peace

    officers,who shall be inproperuniform, shall stay

    outside the room within a radius of thirtymeters

    near enough to be easily called by the board of

    canvassersatanytime.(Ibid.)

    Q: Incasetheelectionreturnsaredelayed, lost

    ordestroyed,whatshouldtheBOCdo?

    A:In

    case

    its

    copy

    of

    the

    election

    returns

    is

    missing,theboardofcanvassersshall:

    1. Obtain such missing election returns

    from the board of election inspectors

    concerned,or ifsaidreturnshavebeen

    lostordestroyed

    2.

    The board of canvassers, upon prior

    authority of the Commission,may use

    any of the authentic copies of said

    election returns or a certified copy of

    said election returns issued by the

    Commission,and

    forthwith

    3. Direct its representative to investigate

    the case and immediately report the

    mattertotheCommission

    Note:Theboardofcanvassers,notwithstandingthe

    fact that not all the election returns have been

    received by it, may terminate the canvass and

    proclaimthecandidateselectedon thebasisof the

    available election returns if the missing election

    returns will not affect the results of the election

    (Sec.233,B.P.881).

    Q:When

    the

    integrity

    of

    ballots

    is

    violated,

    what

    shouldtheBoCdo?

    A:

    1. In case of material defects in the

    election returns If it should clearly

    appear that some requisites in formor

    data had been omitted in the election

    returns, the board of canvassers shall

    callforallthemembersoftheboardof

    election inspectors concerned by the

    most expeditiousmeans, for the same

    boardtoeffectthecorrection.Incaseof

    theomission in theelection returnsof

    thename

    of

    any

    candidate

    and/or

    his

    corresponding votes, the board of

    canvassers shall require the board of

    election inspectors concerned to

    complete the necessary data in the

    election returns and affix therein their

    initials (Sec. 234, B.P. 881 Omnibus

    ElectionCode).

    Note:The rightofacandidate toavailof

    thisprovisionshallnotbe lostoraffected

    by the fact that an election protest is

    subsequently

    filed

    by

    any

    of

    the

    candidates.

    2.

    Incasetheelectionreturnsappeartobe

    tampered with or falsified If the

    electionreturnssubmittedtotheboard

    of canvassers appear to be tampered

    with,alteredorfalsifiedaftertheyhave

    left thehandsof theboardofelection

    inspectors,orotherwisenotauthentic,

    or were prepared by the board of

    election inspectorsunderduress,force,

    intimidation, or prepared by persons

    otherthanthememberoftheboardof

    election inspectors, the board of

    canvassersshallusetheothercopiesof

    said election returns and, if necessary,

    the copy inside the ballot box which

    upon previous authority given by the

    Commission may be retrieved in

    accordance with Section 220 hereof

    (Sec. 235, B.P. 881 Omnibus Election

    Code).

    3. In caseofdiscrepancies in the election

    return if it appears to the board of

    canvassers that there exists

    discrepancies in the other authentic

    copies of the election returns from a

    polling place or discrepancies in the

    votes of any candidate in words and

    figuresinthesamereturn,andineither

    casethedifferenceaffectstheresultsof

    175

    UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

    F a c u l t a d d e D e r e c h o i v i l

    ACADEMICSCHAIR:LESTERJAYALANE.FLORESII

    VICECHAIRSFORACADEMICS:KARENJOYG.SABUGO&JOHNHENRYC.MENDOZA

    VICECHAIRFORADMINISTRATIONANDFINANCE:JEANELLEC.LEE

    VICECHAIRSFORLAYOUTANDDESIGN:EARLLOUIEM.MASACAYAN&THEENAC.MARTINEZ

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    20/25

    USTGOLDENNOTES2011

    the election, the Commission, upon

    motion of the board of canvassers or

    any candidate affected and after due

    noticetoallcandidatesconcerned,shall

    proceed summarily to determine

    whether the integrity of the ballot box

    hadbeenpreserved,andoncesatisfied

    thereof shall order the opening of the

    ballot box to recount the votes cast in

    thepollingplacesolelyforthepurpose

    of determining the true result of the

    count of votes of the candidates

    concerned (Sec.236,B.P.881Omnibus

    ElectionCode).

    Note: When integrity of ballots is violated. The

    Commission shall not recount the ballots but shall

    forthwith seal the ballot box and order its

    safekeeping(Sec.

    237,

    B.P.

    881

    Omnibus

    Election

    Code).

    Canvass of remaining or unquestioned returns to

    continue.If,afterthecanvassofallthesaidreturns,

    itshouldbedeterminedthatthereturnswhichhave

    been setasidewillaffect theresultof theelection,

    no proclamation shall be made except upon orders

    oftheCommissionafterduenoticeandhearing.Any

    proclamation made in violation hereof shall be null

    and void (Sec. 238, B.P. 881 Omnibus Election

    Code).

    176POLITICALLAWTEAM:

    ADVISER:ATTY.EDWINREYSANDOVAL;SUBJECTHEAD:RACHELMARIE L.FELICES;ASST.SUBJECTHEADS:WIVINOE.BRACEROII&

    HERAZEUSCHRISTINEY.UY;MEMBERS:LAWRENCEPAULOH.AQUINO,LEANDRORODELV.ATIENZA,MARINETHEASTERAND.AYOS,

    CARLOR.BALA,WILFREDOT.BONILLA,JR.,KEELACHERNARR.DINOY,APRILV.ENRILE,KENNETHJAMESCARLOC.HIZON,JOSEMARIA

    G.MENDOZA,ROGERCHRISTOPHERR.REYES,ROMILINDAC.SIBAL,JASMINM.SISON,ZARAHPATRICIAT.SUAREZ,RALPHJULIOUSL.VILLAMOR.

    Q:Iftheelectionresultedintoatie,whatshould

    theBOCdo?

    A:Wheneveritshallappearfromthecanvassthat

    two or more candidates have received an equal

    and highest number of votes, or in cases where

    twoormorecandidatesaretobeelectedforthe

    same position and two or more candidates

    received the same number of votes for the last

    place in the number to be elected, the board of

    canvassers,afterrecordingthisfactinitsminutes,

    shallbyresolution,uponfivedaysnoticetoallthe

    tied candidates, hold a special public meeting at

    which the board of canvassers shall proceed to

    the drawing of lots of the candidates who have

    tiedandshallproclaimaselectedthecandidates

    whomaybefavoredby luck,andthecandidates

    so proclaimed shall have the right to assume

    office in the same manner as if he had been

    elected by plurality of vote. The board of

    canvassers shall forthwith make a certificate

    statingthenameofthecandidatewhohadbeen

    favoredbyluckandhisproclamationonthebasis

    thereof. (Sec. 240, B.P. 881 Omnibus Election

    Code)

    Q: When will the proceedings of the BoC be

    consideredasanillegalproceeding?

    A:ThereisanillegalproceedingoftheBOCwhen

    thecanvassing isashamormereceremony, the

    results of which are predetermined and

    manipulated as when any of the following

    circumstancesarepresent:

    1. Precipitatecanvassing

    2. Terrorism

    3. Lackofsufficientnoticetothemembers

    oftheBOC's

    4. Improper venue. (Sec. 2, Rule 4,

    COMELEC Resolution No. 8804, March

    22,2010)

    i.REMEDIESANDJURISDICTIONINELECTION

    LAW

    1.PetitionnottogiveduecoursetoCertificate

    ofCandidacy

    Q: What are the requisites for the grant of a

    petition to deny due course to or cancel a

    certificateofcandidacy?

    A:

    1. Material misrepresentation in the

    qualifications for elective office, which

    includesage,residency,citizenship,and

    anyother legal qualifications necessary

    to run for an elective office; and

    2. Deliberate attempt to mislead,

    misinform or hide a fact which would

    otherwiserenderacandidateineligible.

    Note: These two requirements must

    concur towarrant the cancellationof the

    certificate of candidacy.

  • 8/9/2019 UST Golden Notes - Election Law

    21/25

    ELECTION LAW

    Averifiedpetitionmaybefiledexclusively

    on the ground that any material

    representationcontainedinthecertificate

    asrequiredunderSection74 isf