uva-dare (digital academic repository) international ... · file/dossier no....

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

International criminal trials: A normative theory

Vasiliev, S.

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):Vasiliev, S. (2014). International criminal trials: A normative theory.

General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s),other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, statingyour reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Askthe Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam,The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

Download date: 12 Nov 2020

https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/international-criminal-trials-a-normative-theory(c0974399-c6a0-43aa-868f-45828e6aeab6).html

xx

TABLE OF CASES

Contents: International and Hybrid Courts, Tribunals, and Treaty Bodies xx

Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) xx

European Commission on Human Rights (ECommHR) xxiv

European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) xxiv

Human Rights Committee (HRC) xxvi Inter-American Court on Human Rights (IACtHR) xxvii International Criminal Court (ICC) xxvii Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) xli International Court of Justice (ICJ) xli International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) xli International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) liv

International Military Tribunal (IMT) lxxx

International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE) lxxxi Nuremberg Military Tribunals (Control Council No. 10) lxxxii Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) lxxxii Special Panels for Serious Crimes (East Timor) lxxxvi Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) lxxxix

National Courts xc

Australia xc

Canada xc

Germany xc

England and Wales xc

Israel xci Italy xci United States xci

International and Hybrid Courts, Tribunals, and Treaty Bodies

Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)

Case No. 001 (Kaing Guek Eav, alias Duch)

Closing Order Indicting Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 002/14-08-2006, OCIJ, 8 August 2008

Decision on Appeal against Closing Order indicting Kaing Guek Eav alias “Duch”, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-2007-ECCC/OCIJ (PTC 02), PTC, 5 December 2008

Notification of a Trial Management Meeting and Order to the Parties to File Additional Materials, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 11 December 2008

Agenda for Trial Management Meeting, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 9 January 2009

xxi

Order Setting the Date of the Initial Hearing, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007/ECCC/TC, TC, 19 January 2009

Agenda for Initial Hearing, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007/ECCC/TC, TC, 13 February 2009

Transcript of Proceedings (Initial Hearing, Day 1), Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 17 February 2009

Transcript of Proceedings (Initial Hearing, Day 2), Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 18 February 2009

Decision on Admissibility of New Materials and Direction to the Parties, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007/ECCC/TC, TC, 10 March 2009

Decision on Motion Regarding Deceased Civil Party, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007/ECCC/TC, TC, 13 March 2009

Direction Regarding Opening Statements dated 10 March 2009 and Direction on the Scheduling of the Trial, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 20 March 2009

Decision on the Request of the Co-lawyers for Civil Parties Group 2 to Make an Opening Statement During the Substantive Hearing, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 27 March 2009

Transcript (Trial Day 1), Kaing Guek Eav , Case No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 30 March 2009

Transcript of Proceedings (Trial Day 2), Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 31 March 2009

Transcript of Proceedings (Trial Day 4), Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 6 April 2009

Transcript of Proceedings (Trial Day 5), Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 7 April 2009

Transcript (Trial Day 6), Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 8 April 2009

Transcript (Trial Day 7), Kaing Guek Eav, Case No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 9 April 2009

Order Scheduling the Trial Proceedings for the Period of 20 to 30 April 2009, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 10 April 2009

Transcript (Trial Day 9), Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 21 April 2009

Order Scheduling the Trial Proceedings for the Period of 18 May to 25 June 2009, Kaing Guek Eav, Case No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 30 April 2009

Decision on Admissibility of Material on the Case File as Evidence, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007/ECCC/TC, TC, 26 May 2009

Order Scheduling Sitting Days for the Next Three Months (6 July to 1 October 2009), Kaing Guek Eav, Case No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 12 June 2009

Order Scheduling the Trial Proceedings (Topics and Order of Call of Witnesses) for the Period of 13 July to 26 August 2009, Kaing Guek Eav, Case No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 7 July 2009

Order Scheduling the Trial Proceedings (Topics and Order of Call of Witnesses) for the Period of 17 August to 17 September 2009, Kaing Guek Eav, Case No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 13 August 2009

Considerations of the Pre-Trial Chamber regarding the Disagreement between the Co-Prosecutors pursuant to Internal Rule 71, Disagreement No. 001/18-11-2008-ECCC-PTC, PTC, 18 August 2009

xxii

Direction on Proceedings Relevant to Reparations and on the Filing of Final Written Submissions, Kaing Guek Eav alias “Duch”, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 27 August 2009

Scheduling Order for Closing Statements, Kaing Guek Eav alias “Duch”, Case File/Dossier No. 001/18-07-2007/ECCC/TC, TC, 30 September 2009

Decision on Parties Requests to Put Certain Materials Before the Chamber Pursuant to Internal Rule 87(2), Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001-18-07-2007/ECCC/TC, TC, 28 October 2009

Co-Prosecutors’ Final Trial Submission with Annexes 1-5, Kaing Guek Eav alias “Duch”, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, OCP, 11 November 2009

Final Defence Written Submissions, Kaing Guek Eav alias “Duch”, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, Defence, 11 November 2009

Transcript of trial proceedings – Kaing Guek Eav “Duch” (Trial Day 73), Kaing Guek Eav alias “Duch”, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 23 November 2009

Transcript of trial proceedings – Kaing Guek Eav “Duch” (Trial Day 75), Kaing Guek Eav alias “Duch”, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 25 November 2009

Transcript of Trial Proceedings – Kaing Guek Eav “Duch” (Trial day 76), Kaing Guek Eav alias “Duch”, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 26 November 2009

Transcript of Trial Proceedings – Kaing Guek Eav “Duch” (Trial day 77), Kaing Guek Eav alias “Duch”, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 27 November 2009

Judgement, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007/ECCC/TC, TC, 26 July 2010

Appeal Judgement, Kaing Guek Eav, Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/SC, SCC 3 February 2012

Case No. 002 (Nuon Chea, Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary, and Ieng Thirith)

Decision on Nuon Chea’s Appeal Against Order Refusing Request for Annulment, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/OCIJ (PTC06), PTC, 26 August 2008

Warning to International Co-Lawyer, Khieu Samphan, Case No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/OCIJ (PTC 14 and 15), PTC, 19 May 2009

Closing Order, Nuon Chea, Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary, and Ieng Thirith, Case File 002/19-09-2007-ECCC-OCIJ, OCIJ, 15 September 2010

Transcript of Initial Hearing, Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, Khieu Samphan, and Ieng Thirith, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 27 June 2011

Decision on Nuon Chea’s Preliminary Objection Alleging the Unconstitutional Character of the ECCC Internal Rules, Nuon Chea, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC, TC, 8 August 2011

Severance Order Pursuant to Internal Rule 89ter, Nuon Chea, Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary, and Ieng Thirith, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 22 September 2011

Annex: List of paragraphs and portions of the Closing Order relevant to Case 002/01, amended further to the Trial Chamber's Decision on IENG Thirith's Fitness to Stand Trial (El38) and the Trial Chamber's Decision on Co-Prosecutors' Request to Include Additional Crime Sites within the Scope of Trial in Case 002/01

xxiii

(E163), Nuon Chea, Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary, and Ieng Thirith, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 8 October 2012

Scheduling Order for Opening Statements and Hearing on the Substance in Case 002, Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, Khieu Samphan, and Ieng Thirith, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 18 October 2011

Decision on Co-Prosecutors’ Request for Reconsideration of the Terms of the Trial Chamber’s Severance Order (E/124/2) and Related Motions and Annexes, Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, Khieu Samphan, and Ieng Thirith, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC, TC, 18 October 2011

Witness lists for early trial segments, deadline for filing of admissibility challenges to documents and exhibits, and resonse to Motion E109/5, Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, Khieu Samphan, and Ieng Thirith, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 25 October 2011

Trial Chamber response to Lead Co-lawyers and Civil Party Lawyers’ Request to make a brief Preliminary Remarks on behalf of Civil Parties (E131/4), Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, Khieu Samphan, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 15 November 2011

Decision on Ieng Thirith’s Fitness to Stand Trial, Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, Khieu Samphan and Ieng Thirith, Case No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 17 November 2011

Response to issues raised by parties in advance of trial and scheduling of informal meeting with Senior Legal Officer on 18 November 2011, Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, and Khieu Samphan, Case No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 18 November 2011

Transcript of Trial Proceedings (Trial Day 1), Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, Khieu Samphan, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 21 November 2011

Advance notice of assignment of examination of three Civil Parties during first trial segment (5-16 December 2011), Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, and Khieu Samphan, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 23 November 2011

Notice of variation of order of call of Civil Parties and witnesses or first trial session (5-16 December 2011) and further information related to hearing of evidence during this session (E131/1.2), Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, and Khieu Samphan, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 2 December 2011

Next group of witnesses and experts to be heard in Case 002/01, Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, and Khieu Samphan, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 15 December 2011

Hearing of TCE-38 and TCE-44, Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, and Khieu Samphan, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 6 February 2012

Memorandum entitled "Next group of witnesses, Civil Parties and Experts to be heard in Case 002/01", Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, and Khieu Samphan, Case No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 17 February 2012

Revised order of witnesses for current segment of Case 002/001, Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, and Khieu Samphan, Case No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 28 March 2011

Decision on Rule 35 Applications for Summary Action, Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary and Khieu Samphan, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC, TC, 11 May 2012

Decision on NUON Chea’s Appeal against the Trial Chamber’s Decision on Rule 35 Applications for Summary Action, Nuon Chea, Case File 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC/SC(15), SCC, 14 September 2012

Decision on Immediate Appeal against the Trial Chamber’s Order to Unconditionally Release the Accused IENG Thirith, Ieng Thirith, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007 ECCC-TC/SC(16), SCC, 14 December 2012

xxiv

Termination of the Proceedings against the Accused IENG Sary, Ieng Thirith, Case File 002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC, TC, 14 March 2013

Decision on Civil Party Lead Co-Lawyers’ Internal Rule 87(4) request to place on the Case File and admit new evidence relevant to the victim impact (E285), Nuon Chea and Khieu Samphan, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 31 May 2013

Decision on Internal Rule 87(4) Request of the Co-Prosecutors to Put before the Chamber Document D366/7.1.366, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 14 August 2013

Decision on Objections to the Admissibility of Witness, Victim and Civil Party Statements and Case 001 Transcirpts Proposed by the Co-Prosecutors and Civil Party Lead Co-Laywers, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, TC, 15 August 2013

Adjusted Schedule for Closing Submissions (E295/1, E295/1/2, E295/1/3, E295/2 and E295/3), Nuon Chea and Khieu Samphan, Case File 002/19-09-2007-ECCC-TC, TC, 22 August 2013

Transcript of trial proceedings (Trial Day 215), Nuon Chea and Khieu Samphan, Case File No. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC, TC, 16 October 2013

Case No. 003 Notice of Conclusion of Judicial Investigation, Case File No: 003/07-09-2009-ECCC-

OCIJ, OCIJ, 29 April 2011

European Commission on Human Rights (ECommHR)

Kaufman v. Belgium, Decision as to Admissibility, Application No. 10938/84, 9 December 1986

Callaghan et al. v. United Kingdom, Decision as to Admissibility, Application No. 14739/89, 9 May 1989

European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)

A.M. v. Italy, Judgement, Application No. 37019/97, 14 December 1999 Abdoella v. Netherlands, Judgment, Application no. 12728/87, 25 November 1992 Allan v. the United Kingdom, Judgment, Application No. 48539/99, 5 November 2002 Anderson v. the United Kingdom, Judgment, Application no. 19859/04, 9 February 2010 Artner v. Austria, Judgment, Application No. 13161/87, 28 August 1992 Asch v. Austria, Judgment, Application No. 12398/86, 26 April 1991 Bagetta v. Italy, Judgment, Application no. 10256/83, 25 June 1987 Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo, Judgment, Applications nos. 10590/83, 6 December

1988 Beer and Regan v. Germany, Judgment, Application no. 28934/95, Grand Chamber, 18

February 1999 Belilos v. Switzerland, Judgment, Application No. 10328/83, 29 April 1988 Bhandari v. the United Kingdom, Judgment, Application no. 42341/04, 31 March 2008 Blagojević v. the Netherlands, Decision as to the admissibility, Application No.

49032/07, 9 June 2009 Bocos-Cuesta v. the Netherlands, Judgment, Application No. 54789/00, 10 November

2005 Bonisch v. Austria, Judgment, Application No. 8658/79, 6 May 1985

xxv

Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi (Bosphorus Airways) v. Ireland, Judgment, Application No. 45036/98, Grand Chamber, 30 June 2005

Brandstetter v. Austria, Judgment, Applications nos. 11170/84; 12876/87; 13468/87, 28 August 1991

Bricmont v. Belgium, Judgment, Application No. 10857/84, 7 July 1989 Bulut v. Austria, Judgment, Application No. 17358/90, 22 February 1996 Corigliano v. Italy, Judgment, Application no. 8304/78, 10 December 1982 Croissant v. Germany, Judgment, Application no. 13611/88, 25 September 1992 Delta v. France, Judgment, Application No. 1444/85, 19 December 1990 Djokaba Lambi Longa v. The Netherlands, Decision as to the admissibility, Application

No. 33917/12, 9 October 2012 Dombo Beheer BV v. Netherlands, Judgment, Application No. 14448/88, 27 October

1993 Doorson v. the Netherlands, Judgment, Application No. 20542/92, 26 March 1996 Eckle v. Germany, Judgment, Application No. 8130/78, 15 July 1982 Foti et al. v. Italy, Judgment, Applications nos. 7604/76…, 10 December 1982 Foucher v. France, Judgment, Application 22209/93, 18 March 1997 Funke v. France, Judgment, Application no. 10828/84, 25 February 1993 Frydlender v. France, Judgment, Application no. 30979/96, Grand Chamber, 27 June

2000 Galić v. The Netherlands, Decision as to the admissibility, Application no. 22617/07, 9

June 2009 GK v. Poland, Judgment, Application no. 38816/97, 20 January 2004 Goodwin v. UK, Judgment, Application no. 28957/95, 11 July 2002 Guincho v. Portugal, Judgment, Application no. 8990/80, 10 July 1984 Hauschildt v. Denmark, Judgment, Application no. 10486/83, 24 May 1989 Hentrich v. France, Judgment, Application no. 13616/88, 22 September 1994 Incal v. Turkey, Judgment, Application no. 41/1997/825/1031, 9 June 1998 Ireland v. UK, Application No. 5310/71, 18 January 1979 Isgrò v. Italy, Judgment, Application No. 11339/85, 19 February 1991 Kamasinski v. Austria, Judgment, Application no. 9783/82, 19 December 1989 Kemmache v. France (Nos. 1 and 2), Judgment, Applications Nos 12325/86 and

14992/89, 27 November 1991 Kostovski v. The Netherlands, Judgment, Application no. 11454/85, 20 November 1989 Kiliç v. Turkey, Judgment, Application no. 22492/93, 28 March 2000 Krasniki v. The Czech Republic, Judgement, Application no. 51277/99, 28 February 2006 Kremzow v. Austria, Judgment, Application no. 12350/86, 21 September 1993 Lagerblom v. Sweden, Application no. 26891/95, 14 January 2003 Lanz v. Austria, Judgment, Application no. 24430/94, 31 January 2002 Laukkanen and Manninen v. Finland, Judgment, Application no. 50230/99, 3 February

2004 Lucà v. Italy, Judgment, Application No. 33354/96, 27 February 2001 Lüdi v. Switzerland, Judgment, Application No. 12433/86, 15 June 1992 Matthews v. UK, Judgment, Application No. 24833/94, Grand Chamber, 21 January

1999 M.C. v. Bulgaria, Judgment, Application no. 39272/98, 4 December 2003 Milasi v. Italy, Judgment, Application no. 10527/83, 25 June 1987 Mild and Virtanen v. Finland, Judgement, Applications Nos. 39481/98 and 40227/98, 26

July 2005 Milošević v. the Netherlands, Decision as to the admissibility, Application No. 77631/01,

xxvi

19 March 2002 Mitchell and Holloway v. the United Kingdom, Judgment, Application no. 44808/98, 17

December 2002 Morel v. France, Judgment, Application no. 34130/96, 6 June 2000 John Murray v. UK, Judgment, Application No. 18731/91, 8 February 1996 Naletilić v. Croatia, Decision as to the admissibility, Application No. 51891/99, 4 May

2000 Nortier v. the Netherlands, Judgment, Application No. 13924/88, 24 August 1993 Pélisser and Sassi v. France, Judgment, Application no. 25444/94, Grand Chamber, 25

March 1999 Perez v. France, Judgment, Application no. 47287/99, 12 February 2004 Philis v. Greece (No. 2), Judgment, Application no. 19773/92, 7 June 1997 Piersack v. Belgium, Judgment, Application No. 8692/79, 1 October 1982 Price and Lowe v. the United Kingdom, Judgment, Application nos. 43185/98 and

43186/98, 29 July 2003 Quinn v. Ireland, Judgment, Application No. 36887/97, 21 December 2000 Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom, Judgment, Application no. 28901/95, Grand

Chamber, 16 February 2000 S.N. v. Sweden, Judgment, Application No. 34209/96, 2 July 2002 Saïdi v. France, Judgment, Application No. 14647/89, 20 September 1993 Saraiva de Carvalho v. Portugal, Judgment, Application no. 15651/89, 22 April 1994 Saunders v. the United Kingdom, Judgment, Application No. 19187/91, 17 December

1996 Schenk v. Switzerland, Judgment, Application No. 10862/84, 12 July 1988 Serves v. France, Judgment, Application No. 20225/92, 20 October 1997 Unterpertinger v. Austria, Judgment, Application no. 9120/80, 24 November 1986 Van Mechelen et al. v. Netherlands, Judgment, Applications nos. 21363/93, 21364/93,

21427/93 and 22056/93, 23 April 1997 Vidal v. Belgium, Judgment, Application No. 12351/86 , 22 April 1992 Waite and Kennedy v. Germany, Judgment, Application No. 26083/94, Grand Chamber,

18 February 1999 Werner v. Poland, Judgment, Application no. 26760/95, 15 November 2001 X and Y v. the Netherlands, Judgment, Application No. 8978/80, 26 March 1985

Human Rights Committee (HRC)

Aliboeva v. Tajikistan, Views, Communication No. 985/2001, 16 November 2005 (UN Doc. CCPR/C/85/D/985/2001)

Fanali v. Italy, Views, Communication No. 75/1980, 31 March 1983 (UN Doc. Supp. No. 40 (A/38/40))

Gautrin et al. v. France, Judgment, Applications nos. 38/1997/822/1025–1028, 20 May 1998

Gelazauskas v. Lithuania, Views, Communication No. 836/1998, 17 March 2003 (UN Doc. CCPR/C/77/D/836/1998)

Francisco Juan Larrañaga v. The Philippines, Views, Communication No. 1421/2005, 24 July 2006 (UN Doc. CCPR/C/87/D/1421/2005)

Karttunen v. Finland, Views, Communication No. 387/1989, 5 November 1992 (U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/46/D/387/1989)

Khalilova v. Tajikistan, Views, Communication No. 973/2001, 13 April 2004 (UN Doc. CCPR/C/83/D/973/2001)

xxvii

Salgar de Montego v. Colombia, Views, Communication No. 64/1979, 24 March 1982 (UN Doc. CCPR/C/OP/1)

Saidova v. Tajikistan, Views, Communication No. 964/2001, 20 August 2004 (UN Doc. CCPR/C/81/D/964/2001)

Peart and Peart v. Jamaica, Views, Communications Nos 464/1991 & 482/1991, 24 July 1995 (UN Doc.CCPR/C/54/D/464/1991 & 482/1991)

Jesús Terrón v. Spain, Views, Communication No. 1073/2002, 26 August 2005 (UN Doc. CCPR/C/82/D/1073/2002)

Bernardino Gomaríz Valera v. Spain, Views, Communication no. 1095/2002, 22 July 2005 (UN Doc. CCPR/C/84/D/1095/2002)

Inter-American Court on Human Rights (IACtHR)

Baena Ricardo et al. Case (270 Workers v. Panama), Judgment, 28 November 2003, IACtHR (Ser. C) No. 104 (2003)

International Criminal Court (ICC)

Situation in the Central African Republic (ICC-01/05)

Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo (ICC-01/05-01/08) Decision on the Evidence Disclosure System and Setting a Timetable for Disclosure

between the Parties, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-55, PTC III, 31 July 2008

Judgement on the appeal of Mr. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo against the decision of Pre-Trial Chamber III entitled “Decision on application for interim release”, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-323, AC, 16 December 2008

Decision on the Confirmation of Charges, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-424, PTC III, 15 June 2009

Decision constituting Trial Chamber III and referring to it the case of The Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-534, Presidency, ICC, 18 September 2009

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, ICC-01/05-01/08-T-18-Red-ENG, TC III, ICC, 8 December 2009

Decision on the procedures to be adopted for instructing expert witnesses, Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, ICC-01/05-01/08-695, TC III, 12 February 2010

Corrigendum to Decision on the participation of victims in the trial and on 86 applications by victims to participate in the proceedings, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-807-Corr, TC III, 12 July 2010

Decision on the Unified Protocol on the practices used to prepare and familiarise witnesses for giving testimony at trial, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-1016, TC III, 18 November 2010

Decision on Directions for the Conduct of the Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-1023, TC III, 19 November 2010

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-T-30-ENG, TC III, 21 October 2010 Order on the “Prosecution’s Revised Order of its Witnesses at Trial and Estimated Length

of Questioning”, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-996, TC III, 4 November 2010

xxviii

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-T-32-ENG, TC III, 22 November 2010

Decision (i) ruling on legal representatives' applications to question Witness 33 and (ii) setting a schedule for the filing of submissions in relation to future applications to question witnesses, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-1729, TC III, 9 September 2011

Order regarding applications by victims to present their views and concerns or to present evidence, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-1935, TC III, 21 November 2011

Decision on supplemented applications by the legal representatives of victims to present evidence and the views and concerns of victims, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-2138, TC III, 22 February 2012

Decision on the presentation of views and concems by victims a/0542/08, a/0394/08 and a/0511/08, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-2220, TC III, 24 May 2012

Decision on the “Submissions on Defence Evidence”, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-2225, TC III, 7 June 2012

Decision on the timeline for the completion of the defence's presentation of evidence and issues related to the closing of the case, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-2731, TC III, 16 July 2013

Public redacted version of "Second decision on issues related to the closing of the case", Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-2837-Red, TC III, 18 October 2013

Decision on the Motion for clarification and reconsideration of the timetable for the parties' final submissions of evidence, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-2855, TC III, 30 October 2013

Decision on the time limit for the conclusion of the defence's presentation of oral evidence at trial, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08-2861, TC III, 1 November 2013

Situation in the Côte D’Ivoire (ICC-02/11)

Laurent Gbagbo (ICC-02/11-01/11) Decision adjourning the hearing on the confirmation of charges pursuant to article

61(7)(c)(i) of the Rome Statute, Prosecutor v. Gbagbo, ICC-02/11-01/11-432, PTC I, 3 June 2013

Dissenting opinion of Judge Silvia Fernández de Gurmendi, Prosecutor v. Gbagbo, ICC-02/11-01/11-432-Anx-Corr, PTC I, 6 June 2013

Situation in Darfur, Sudan (ICC-02/05)

Ahmad Muhammad Harun and Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman (ICC-02/05-01/07) Decision on the Prosecution Application under Article 58(7) of the Statute, Prosecutor v.

Harun and Al-Rahman, ICC-02/05-01/07-1, PTC I, 27 April 2007

Bahar Idriss Abu Garda (ICC-02/05-02/09) Decision on the Confirmation of Charges, Prosecutor v. Abu Garda, ICC-02/05-02/09-

243-Red, PTC I, 8 February 2010 (with Separate Opinion of Judge Cuno Tarfusser)

xxix

Decision on the ‘Prosecution’s Application for Leave to Appeal the “Decision on the Confirmation of Charges”, Prosecutor v. Abu Garda, ICC-02/05-02/09-257, PTC I, 25 April 2010

Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus (ICC-02/05-03/09) Corrigendum of the “Decision on the Confirmation of Charges”, Prosecutor v. Banda

and Jerbo, ICC-02/05-03/09-121-Corr-Red, PTC I, 7 March 2011 Joint Submission by the Office of the Prosecutor and the Defence Regarding the

Contested Issues at the Trial of the Accused Person, Prosecutor v. Banda and Jerbo, ICC-02/05-03/09-148, OTP and Defence, 16 May 2011

Order requesting submissions on procedures to facilitate the fair and expeditious conduct of the proceedings following the Joint Submission of 16 May 2011, Prosecutor v. Banda Abakaer Nourain and Jerbo Jamus, ICC-02/05-03/09-155, TC IV, 30 May 2011

Joint Submissions by the Office of the Prosecutor and the Defence regarding the Procedures to be adopted for the Presentation of Evidence, Prosecutor v. Banda and Jerbo, ICC-02/05-03/09-166, OTP and Defence, 27 June 2011

Decision Public on the Joint Submission regarding facts, Prosecutor v. Banda and Jerbo, Situation in the DRC, ICC-02/05-03/09-227, TC IV, 28 September 2011

Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (ICC-01/04)

Decision on the Prosecution’s Applications for Leave to Appeal the Chamber’s Decision of 17 January 2006 on the Applications for Participation in the Proceedings of VPRS 1, VPRS 2, VPRS 3, VPRS 4, VPRS 5 and VPRS 6, Situation in the DRC, ICC-01/04-135-tEN, PTC I, 31 March 2006

Judgment on the Prosecutor’s Application for Extraordinary Review of Pre-Trial Chamber I’s 31 March 2006 Decision Denying Leave to Appeal, Situation in the DRC, ICC-01/04-168, AC, 13 July 2006

Decision on the requests of the Legal Representative for victims VPRS 1 to VPRS 6 regarding “Prosecutor’s information on further investigation”, Situation in the DRC, ICC-01/04-399, PTC I, 26 September 2007

Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (ICC-01/04-01/06) Decision on the Final System of Disclosure and the Establishment of the Timetable,

Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-102, PTC I, 15 May 2006 Decision Establishing General Principles Governing Applications to Restrict Disclosure

pursuant to Rule 81 (2) and (4) of the Statute, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, Situation in the DRC, ICC-01/04-01/06-108, PTC I, 19 May 2006

Decision on the admissibility of the four documents, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1399, TC I, 13 June 2006

Decision on the Prosecutor’s “Application for Leave to Reply to ‘Conclusions de la défense en réponse au mémoire d’appel du Procureur’”, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-424, AC, 12 September 2006 (with Separate Opinion of Judge Pikis)

Decision on the Arrangements for Participation of Victims a/0001/06, a/0002/06 and a/0003/06 at the Confirmation Hearing, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-462, PTC I, 22 September 2006

xxx

Decision concerning the Prosecution Proposed Summary Evidence, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-517, PTC I, 4 October 2006

Decision on the Practices of Witness Familiarisation and Witness Proofing, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-679, PTC I, 8 November 2006

Judgment on the Appeal of Mr. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo against the Decision on the Defence Challenge to the jurisdiction of the Court pursuant to article 19 (2) (a) of the Statute of 3 October 2006, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-772, AC, 14 December 2006

Decision on the Confirmation of Charges, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-803-tEN, PTC I, 29 January 2007

Decision constituting Trial Chamber I and referring to it the case of The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-842, Presidency, 6 March 2007

Decision on the Prosecution and Defence applications for leave to appeal the Decision on the confirmation of charges, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-915, PTC I, 24 May 2007

Decision transmitting the pre-trial record of proceedings in the case of The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo to Trial Chamber I, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-920, Presidency, 5 June 2007

Decision on the admissibility of the appeal of Mr. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo against the decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I entitled “Décision sur la confirmation des charges” of 29 January 2007, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-926, AC, 13 June 2007

Decision of the Appeals Chamber on the Joint Application of Victims a/0001/06 to a/0003/06 and a/105/06 concerning the “Directions and Decision of the Appeals Chamber” of 2 February 2007, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-925, AC, 13 June 2007 (with Separate opinion of Judge Georghios M. Pikis)

Request for submissions on subjects that require early determination, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-936, TC I, 18 July 2007

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-50, TC I, 4 September 2007 Prosecution’s submission regarding the subjects that require early determination: status of

the evidence heard by the Pre-Trial Chamber; status of decisions of the Pre-Trial Chamber; and manner in which evidence shall be submitted, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-953, OTP, 12 September 2007

Conclusions de la Défense sur des questions devant être tranchées à un stade précoce de la procédure: statut devant la Chambre de première instance des témoignages entendus par la Chambre préliminaire, statut des décisions de la Chambre préliminaire dans le cadre des procédures de première instance et modalités de présentation des éléments de prevue, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1033, Defence, 12 September 2007

Order setting out schedule for submissions and hearings regarding the subjects that require early determination, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-947, TC, 5 September 2007

Trial Chamber’s Agenda for the Hearing on Monday 1st October 2007, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-862, TC I, 25 September 2007

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-0104-0106-T-52-ENG, TC I, 1 October 2007 Order amending schedule for hearing, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-977, TC,

9 October 2007 The Trial Chamber’s Agenda for the Hearing on 29-31 October 2007, Prosecutor v.

Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-985, TC I, 17 October 2007

xxxi

Decision Regarding the Timing and Manner of Disclosure and the Date of Trial, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1019, TC I, 9 November 2007

Decision on the implementation of the reporting system between the Registrar and the Trial Chamber in accordance with Rule 89 and Regulation of the Court 86(5), Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1022, TC I, 9 November 2007

Decision Regarding the Practices Used to Prepare and Familiarise Witnesses for Giving Testimony at Trial, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1049, TC I, 30 November 2007

Decision on the procedures to be adopted for ex parte proceedings, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1058, TC I, 6 December 2007

Decision on the procedures to be adopted for instructing expert witnesses, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1069, TC I, 10 December 2007

Order setting out the schedule for submissions and hearing on further subjects which require determination prior to trial, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1083, TC I, 13 December 2007

Decision on the status before the Trial Chamber of the evidence heard by the Pre- Trial Chamber and the decisions of the Pre-Trial Chamber in trial proceedings, and the manner in which evidence shall be submitted, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1084, TC I, 13 December 2007

Decision on defence’s request to obtain simultaneous French transcripts, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1091, TC I, 14 December 2007

Decision on Victims’ Participation, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1119, TC I, 18 January 2008

Decision on various issues related to witnesses’ testimony during trial, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1140, TC I, 29 January 2008

Decision on remote access to the broadcast of closed session proceedings, ICC-01/04-01/06-1142, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, TC I, 30 January 2008

Decision suspending deadline for final disclosure, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1141, TC I, 30 January 2008

Decision on agreements between the parties, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1179, TC I, 20 February 2008

The Trial Chamber's Agenda for the Status Conference on 12 March 2008 and scheduling order, ICC-01/04-01/06-1209, TC I, 5 March 2008

Decision on the role of the Office of Public Counsel for Victims and its request for access to documents; Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1211, TC I, 6 March 2008

Second decision on the E-Court Protocol, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1223, TC I, 13 March 2008

Decision on disclosure by the defence, ICC-01/04-01/06-1235, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, TC I, 20 March 2008

Agenda for Status Conference on 28 May 2008 and scheduling order, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1343, TC I, 21 May 2008

Decision on opening and closing statements, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1346, TC I, 22 May 2008 (with Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge René Blattmann)

Decision on whether two judges alone may hold a hearing -and- Recommendations to the Presidency on whether an alternate judge should be assigned for the trial, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1349, 22 May 2008

Decision regarding the Protocol on the practices to be used to prepare witnesses for trial, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1351, TC I, TC I, 23 May 2008

xxxii

Decision on the E-Court Protocol, ICC-01/04-01/06-1127, 24 January 2008; Decision on certain practicalities regarding individuals who have the dual status of witness and victim, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1379, TC I, 5 June 2008

Decision on the consequences of non-disclosure of exculpatory materials covered by Article 54(3)(e) agreements and the application to stay the prosecution of the accused, together with certain other issues raised at the Status Conference on 10 June 2008, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1401, TC I, 13 June 2008

Judgement on the appeals of the Prosecutor and the Defence against the Trial Chamber I’s Decision on Victims’ Participation of 18 January 2008, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01-/06-1432, AC, 11 July 2008 (with Partly Dissenting opinion of Judge G.M. Pikis and Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Philippe Kirsch, ICC-01/04-01/06-1432-Anx, 24 July 2008)

Judgment on the appeal of the Prosecutor against the decision of Trial Chamber I entitled “Decision on the consequences of non-disclosure of exculpatory materials covered by Article 54(3)(e) agreements and the application of stay the prosecution of the accused, together with certain other issues raised at the Status Conference on 10 June 2008”, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1486, AC, 21 October 2008 (with Dissenting opinion of Judge Pikis)

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-98-ENG, TC I, 18 November 2008

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-99-ENG-ET, TC I, 25 November 2008

Decision on the use of visual aids, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1528, TC I, 2 December 2008

Transcript (status conference), Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-101-ENG, TC I, 12 January 2009

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-227-CONF-ENG-ET, TC I, 14 January 2010

Transcript (status conference; oral ruling on Rule 140), Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-104, TC I, 16 January 2009

Reasons for Oral Decision lifting the stay of proceedings, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-1644, TC I, 23 January 2009

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-107-ENG, TC I, 26 January 2009 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-109-ENG, TC I, 27 January 2009 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-110-ENG, TC I, 28 January 2009 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-114-ENG, TC I, 3 February 2009 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-120-ENG, TC I, 6 February 2009 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-123-ENG, TC I, 10 February

2009 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-169-ENG, TC I, 6 May 2009 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-193-ENG, TC I, 17 June 2009 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-194-ENG, TC I, 18 June 2009 Decision on the admission of material from the “bar table”, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-

01/04-01/06-1981, TC I, 24 June 2009 Redacted version of "Preliminary and Final Decisions on the group of potential court

witnesses", Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, ICC-01/04-01/06-2033-Anx2, TC I, 25 June 2009

Decision on the request by victims a/ 0225/06, a/0229/06 and a/0270/07 to express their views and concerns in person and to present evidence during the trial, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-2032-Anx, TC I, 26 June 2009

xxxiii

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-202-ENG, TC I, 2 July 2009 Decision giving notice to the parties and participants that the legal characterisation of the

facts may be subject to change in accordance with regulation 55(2) of the Regulations of the Court, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-2049, TC I, 14 July 2009 (with Minority Opinion of Judge Fulford)

Decision on the Manner of Questioning Witnesses by the Legal Representatives of Victims, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-2127, TC I, 16 September 2009

Decision adjourning the evidence in the case and consideration of Regulation 55, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-2143, TC I, 2 October 2009

Judgment on the appeals of Mr Lubanga Dyilo and the Prosecutor against the Decision of Trial Chamber I of 14 July 2009 entitled "Decision giving notice to the parties and participants that the legal characterisation of the facts may be subject to change in accordance with Regulation 55(2) of the Regulations of the Court", Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-2205, AC, 8 December 2009

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, Situation in the DRC, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-222-ENG, TC I, 9 December 2009

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, Situation in the DRC, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-223-ENG, TC I, 7 January 2010

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, Situation in the DRC, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-224-ENG, TC I, 8 January 2010

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-226-Red-ENG, TC I, 13 January 2010



Redacted Second Decision on disclosure by the defence and Decision on whether the prosecution may contact defence witnesses, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-2192-Red, TC I, 20 January 2010


Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-223-ENG, TC I, 7 January 2010 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-240-Red-ENG, TC I, 8 February

2010 Decision on the defence observations regarding the right of the legal representatives of

victims to question defence witnesses and on the notion of personal interest -and-Decision on the defence application to exclude certain representatives of victims from the Chamber during the non-public evidence of various defence witnesses, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-2340, TC I, 11 March 2010

Decision on judicial questioning, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-2360, TC I, 18 March 2010

Decision on the “Requête de la Défense sollicitant l'autorisation d'interjeter appel de la décision orale du 4 mars 2010 autorisant l'utilisation et le dépôt en preuve de trois photographies”, ICC-01/04-01/06-2404, TC I, 29 April 2010

Order on the timetable for closing submissions, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-2722, TC I, 12 April 2011

Redacted Decision on the Prosecution's Application to Admit Rebuttal Evidence from Witness DRC-OTP-WWWW-0005, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-2727-Red, TC I, 28 April 2011

xxxiv

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-356-ENG, TC I, 25 August 2011 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-357-ENG, TC I, 26 August 2011 Judgment pursuant to Article 74, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01/04-01/06-2842, TC I,

14 March 2012 Decision on Sentence pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute, Prosecutor v. Lubanga,

ICC-01/04-01/06-2901, TC I, 10 July 2012

Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui (ICC-01/04-01/07) Decision on the Joinder of the Cases against Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo

Chui, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Prosecutor v. Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-257 and ICC-01/04-01/07-307, PTC I, 10 March 2008

Decision on the powers of the Pre-Trial Chamber to review proprio motu the pretrial detention of Germain Katanga, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-330, PTC I, 18 March 2008

Corrigendum to the Decision on Evidentiary Scope of the Confirmation Hearing, Preventive Relocation and Disclosure under Article 67(2) of the Statute and Rule 77 of the Rules, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-428-Corr, PTC I, 25 April 2008

Decision on the Set of Procedural Rights Attached to Procedural Status of Victim at the Pre-Trial State of the Case, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-474, PTC I, 13 May 2008

Judgment on the appeal of the Prosecutor against the decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I entitled “First Decision on the Prosecution Request for Authorisation to Redact Witness Statements”, Prosecutor v. Katanga Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-475, AC, 13 May 2008

Judgment on the appeal of Mr Germain Katanga against the decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I entitled “Decision on the Defence Request Concerning Languages”, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-522, AC, 27 May 2008

Decision on the Confirmation of Charges, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo, ICC-01/04-01/07-717, PTC I, 30 September 2008 (with Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Anita Ušacka)

Order Instructing the Participants and the Registry to Respond to Questions of Trial Chamber II for the Purpose of the Status Conference (Art. 64(3)(a) of the Statute), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-747, TC II, 13 November 2008

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo, ICC-01/04-01/07-T-52-ENG, TC II, 27 November 2008

Decision on the Redaction Process, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-819-tENG, TC II, 12 January 2009

Motion Challenging the Admissibility of the Case by the Defence of Germain Katanga, pursuant to Article 19(2)(a) of the Statute, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-891-Conf-Exp, Defence, 10 February 2009 (public version released on 11 March 2009, ICC-01/04-01/07-949)

Decision on “Mr Mathieu Ngudjolo’s Complaint under Regulation 221(1) of the Regulations of the Registry Against the Registrar’s Decision of 18 November 2008”’, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-RoR217-02/08-8, Presidency, 10 March 2009

xxxv

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application for Protective Measures Pursuant to Art. 54(3)(f) of the Statute and Rule 81(4) of the Rules, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-989-tENG, TC II, 25 March 2009

Order concerning the Presentation of Incriminating Evidence and the E-Court Protocol, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, Situation in the DRC, ICC-01/04-01/07-956, TC II, 13 March 2009

Decision on the E-Court Protocol, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1049, TC II, 9 April 2009

Decision on the “Prosecution’s Motion to File Partial Table of Incriminating Evidence and Related Material, Confidential - Ex Parte, available to the Prosecution Only, on 4 May 2009 - Regulation 35”, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1095, TC II, 4 May 2009

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application to Redact Information from Certain Evidence under Art. 67(2) of the Statute or Rule 77 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (ICC-01/04-01/07-957), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1098-tENG, TC II, 4 May 2009

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application to Redact Information under Art. 67(2) of the Statute or Rule 77 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (ICC-01/04-01/07-902), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1099-tENG, TC II, 4 May 2009

Decision on the “Prosecution's Application to Amend Paragraph 14 of the Order concerning the Presentation of Incriminating Evidence and the E-Court Protocol of the Rome Statute (Art. 64)”, Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1132, TC II, 14 May 2009 Decision on a number of procedural issues raised by the Registry, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1113, TC II, 14 May 2009

Decision on the Disclosure of Incriminating Photographs, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1143-tENG, TC II, 18 May 2009 Public redacted version of the Decision on the Protection of Prosecution Witnesses 267 and 353 of 20 May 2009 (ICC-01/04-01/07-1156-Conf-Exp), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1179-tENG, TC II, 28 May 2009

Reasons for the Oral Decision on the Motion Challenging the Admissibility of the Case (Art. 19 of the Statute), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1213-tENG, TC II, 16 June 2009

Appeal of the Defence for Germain Katanga against the Decision of the Trial Chamber ‘Motifs de la décision orale relative à l’exception d’irrecevabilité de l’affaire’, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1234, Defence, 22 June 2009

Public Redacted Version of the Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application for Protective Measures and the Redaction of Information Contained in Rule 77 Material (Witnesses 132, 249 and 287) (ICC-01/04-01/07-1194) of 2 July 2009 (ICC-01/04-01/07-1265-Conf-Exp), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1281-tENG, TC II, 8 July 2009

Public Redacted Version of the Decision on the Disclosure of a Redacted Version of the Screening Notes concerning Witness 315 of 2 July 2009 (ICC-01/04-01/07-1264-Conf-Exp), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1282-tENG, TC II, 8 July 2009

xxxvi

Decision on protective measures for 16 protected witnesses in the Lubanga case, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1332, TC II, 24 July 2009

Public redacted version of the “Decision on the Thirteen Documents Obtained under Article 54(3)(e) of the Statute and Not Yet Disclosed to the Defence” dated 19 June 2009, ICC-01/04-01/07-1227-Conf-Ex, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1249-tENG, TC II, 26 June 2009

Order on the organisation of common legal representation of victims, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1328, TC II, 22 July 2009

Decision on the “Prosecution's Urgent Application to Be Permitted to Present as Incriminating Evidence Transcripts and translations of Videos and Video DRCOTP-1042-0006 pursuant to Regulation 35 and Request for Redactions (ICC-01/04-01/07-1260)”, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1336, TC II, 27 July 2009

Order on the submissions by the Defence on the Table of Incriminating Evidence and on the sequence of Prosecution witnesses, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1337, TC II, 27 July 2009

Decision on the disclosure of evidentiary material relating to Witness 219, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1364, TC II, 13 August 2009

Public Version of the Decision of 9 April 2009 on the Prosecution Brief in Response to the Chamber’s Requests in Four Decisions on Applications for Redactions (ICC-01/04-01/07-1047-Conf-Exp), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1390-tENG, 18 August 2009

Public Redacted Version of the Decision on the Prosecutor’s Brief in Response to the Chamber’s Requests in Four Decisions on Applications for Redactions of 8 May 2009 (ICC-01/04-01/07-1119-Conf-Exp), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1393-tENG, TC II, 18 August 2009

Public Redacted Version of the Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application to Redact Information Falling Under Article 67(2) of the Statute and Rule 77 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Witnesses 6, 83, 102 and 221) of 18 May 2009 (ICC-01/04-01/07-1145-Conf-Exp), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1396-tENG, TC II, 18 August 2009

Public redacted version of the Decision pursuant to the additional information provided by the Prosecutor on the requests to redact information concerning the statement of Witness 243 as well as material relating to Witness 12 of 9 April 2009 (ICC-01/04-01/07-1051-Conf-Exp, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1398-tENG, TC II, 18 August 2009

Decision on the Prosecutor's request for late disclosure of exculpatory evidence (Witness P-387) (ICC-01/04-01/07-1296), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1423, TC II, 25 August 2009

Decision on the disclosure of evidentiary material relating to Witness 219, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1434, TC II, 27 August 2009

Decision on the interpretation of the court proceedings, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1473, TC II, 15 September 2009

Public Redacted Version of the Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application to Redact Information in a Video Tape dated 18 May 2009 (ICC-01/04-01/07-1148-Conf-Exp), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1394-tENG, TC II, 18 August 2009

xxxvii

Judgment on the Appeal of Mr. Germain Katanga against the Oral Decision of Trial Chamber II of 12 June 2009 on the Admissibility of the Case Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1497, AC, 25 September 2009

Thèmes principaux sur lesquels les témoins de l'Accusation déposeront, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1514, OTP, 7 October 2009

Decision on the disclosure of evidentiary material relating to the Prosecutor's site visit to Bogoro on 28,29 and 31 March 2009 (ICC-01/04-01/07-1305,1345,1360,1401,1412 and 1456), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1515-tENG, TC II, 7 October 2009

Decision on the Filing of a Summary of the Charges by the Prosecutor, ICC-01/04-01/07-1547-tENG, 21 October 2009

Decision on the Prosecution request for the addition of witness P-219 to the Prosecution List of Incriminating Witnesses and the disclosure of related incriminating material to the Defence, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1553, TC II, 23 October 2009

Directions for the conduct of the proceedings and testimony in accordance with rule 140, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1665, TC II, 20 November 2009

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-T-76-Red-ENG, TC II, 3 November 2009

Decision on the Prosecution's Application to Add P-317 to the Prosecution Witness List (ICC-01/04-01/07-1537), ICC-01/04-01/07-1590, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, TC II, 3 November 2009

Decision on the Application by the Defence for Mathieu Ngudjolo for Postponement of the Commencement Date for the Hearings on the Merits (Rule 132(1) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1603-tENG, TC II, 5 November 2009

Observations conjointes des Représentants légaux des victimes sur l’ordre de d’interrogation des témoins, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1605, ICC, 6 November 2009

Defence submissions in respect of the application of Rule 140, ICC-01/04-01/07-1606, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, Defence (Katanga), 6 November 2009

Décision relative à la divulgation de l'identité des victimes aux parties, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1607, TC II, 6 November 2009

Observations et propositions de l’Accusation sur l’interrogatoire des témoins en audience, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1610, OTP, 6 November 2009

Notification de l’Accusation sur la durée des interrogatoires principaux des témoins à charge, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1636, OTP, 13 November 2009

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-T-80-ENG, TC II, 24 November 2009




Order on protective measures for certain witnesses called by the Prosecutor and the Chamber (Rules 87 and 88 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence), Prosecutor

xxxviii

v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1667-Red, TC II, 9 December 2009

Second decision on documents obtained pursuant to article 54(3)(e) and already disclosed to the Defence in redacted form, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1661-Red2, TC II, 21 December 2009

Public Redacted Version of the Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application to Redact Information in the Second Statement of Prosecution Witness 249 of 18 May 2009 (ICC-01/04-01/07-1149-Conf-Exp), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1395-Corr-tENG, TC II, 22 December 2009

Decision on protective measures for the exhibits associated with the testimony of P-2, P-30 and P-157, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1741-tENG, TC II, 24 December 2009

Decision on the Prosecution's request for authorisation to add the signed record of questioning by P-219 to the Prosecution List of Incriminating Evidence, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1772, TC II, 19 January 2010

Decision on the Modalities of Victim Participation at Trial, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1788-tENG, TC II, 22 January 2010

Order in relation to the disclosure of the identity of P-143, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1817-tENG, TC II, 1 February 2010

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-T-97-Red-ENG, TC II, 8 February 2010

Decision on the “Prosecution’s Application for Leave to Appeal Oral Rulings on Clarifying Inconsistencies in Prior Statements and Partial Hostility, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-1958, TC II, 11 March 2010

Decision on an Amicus Curiae application and on the “Requête tendant à obtenir présentations des témoins DRC‐D02‐P‐0350, DRC‐D02‐P‐0236, DRC‐D02‐P‐0228 aux autorités néerlandaises aux fins d’asile” (articles 68 and 93(7) of the Statute), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-3003-tENG, TC II, 9 June 2011

Judgment on the Appeal of Mr Katanga Against the Decision of Trial Chamber II of 22 January 2010 Entitled “Decision on the Modalities of Victim Participation at Trial”, Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-2288, AC, 16 July 2010

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo, ICC-01/04-01/07-222-Red-ENG WT, TC II, 24 November 2010

Order determining the mode and order of examination for the witnesses called by the Defence teams (regulations 43 and 54 of the Regulations of the Court), Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-2775-tENG, TC II, 15 March 2011

Order on the arrangements for the submission of the written and oral closing statements (regulation 54 of the Regulations of the Court), Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-3218-tENG, TC II, 15 December 2011

Decision on the requests of the parties and participants for an extension of the page limit for their written closing submissions, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-3249-tENG, TC II, 17 February 2012

Ordonnance relative aux modalités de présentation des conclusions orales, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-3274, TC II, 20 April 2012

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-T-336-ENG, TC II, 15 May 2012

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-T-337-Red-ENG, TC II, 16 May 2012

xxxix

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo, ICC-01/04-01/07-T-338-Red-ENG, TC II, 21 May 2012



Decision amending the arrangements for the filing of the written submissions, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-3238-tENG, TC II, 14 February 2012

Decision on the requests of the parties and participants for an extension of the page limit for their written closing submissions, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-3249-tENG, TC II, 17 February 2012

Decision on the arrangements for the filing of observations by the parties and participants on the judgment handed down in Lubanga, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-3255-tENG, TC II, 2 March 2012

Décision relative à la mise en oevre de la norme 55 du Règlement de la Court et prononçant la disjunction des charges protées contre les accuses, Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-01/07-3319, TC II, ICC, 21 November 2012 (with Dissenting Opinion of Judge Christine van den Wyngaert)

Callixte Mbarushimana (ICC-01/04-01/10) Decision on the Confirmation of Charges, Prosecutor v. Mbarushimana, ICC-01/04-

01/10-465-Red, PTC I, 16 December 2011 Judgment on the appeal of the Prosecutor against the decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I of

16 December 2011 entitled “Decision on the confirmation of charges”, Prosecutor v. Mbarushimana, ICC-01/04-01/10-514, AC, 30 May 2012

Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui (ICC-01/04-02/12) Judgment pursuant to article 74 of the Statute, Prosecutor v. Ngudjolo Chui, ICC-01/04-

02/12-3-tENG, TC II, 18 December 2012

Situation in the Republic of Kenya (ICC-01/09)

William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang (ICC-01/09-01/11) Decision on Victims’ Participation at the Confirmation of Charges Hearing and in the

Related Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Ruto, Kosgey, and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11-249, PTC II, ICC, 5 August 2011

Decision on the Confirmation of Charges Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute, Prosecutor v. Ruto, Kosgey, and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11-373, PTC II, 23 January 2012

Decision on victims' representation and participation, Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11-460, TC V, 3 October 2012

Decision on Witness Preparation, Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11-524, TC V, 2 January 2013

Decision on the Conduct of Trial Proceedings (General Directions), Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11-847, TC V(a), 9 August 2013

Decision on the Conduct of Trial Proceedings (General Directions), Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11-847, TC V, 12 August 2013

xl

Decision No. 2 on the Conduct of Trial Proceedings (General Directions), Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11-900, TC V, 3 September 2013

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11-T-27-ENG, TC V(a), 10 September 2013

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11-T-28-ENG, TC V(a), 11 September 2013

Decision No. 3 on the Conduct of Proceedings (Public Redacted Versions of Transcripts of Testimonies Heard in Private Session), Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11-981, TC V, ICC, 24 September 2013

Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta (ICC-01/09-02/11) Decision on the Confirmation of Charges pursuant to Art. 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome

Statute, Prosecutor v. Muthaura, Kenyatta, and Ali, ICC-01/09-02/11-382-Red, PTC II, 23 January 2012

Decision referring the case of The Prosecutor v. Francis Kirimi Muthaura and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta to Trial Chamber V, ICC-01/09-02/11-414, 29 March 2012

Decision on victims' representation and participation, Prosecutor v. Kenyatta, ICC-01/09-02/11-498, TC V, 3 October 2012

Decision on Witness Preparation, Prosecutor v. Kenyatta, ICC-01/09-02/11-588, TC V, 2 January 2013

Prosecution notification of withdrawal of the charges against Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Prosecutor v. Muthaura and Kenyatta, ICC-01/09-02/11-687, OTP, 11 March 2013

Decision on the withdrawal of charges against Mr Muthaura, Prosecutor v. Muthaura and Kenyatta, ICC-01/09-02/11-696, TC V, 18 March 2013

Partial dissenting Opinion of Judge Ozaki and Concurring Separate Opinion of Judge Eboe-Osuji, Decision on the withdrawal of charges against Mr Muthaura, Prosecutor v. Muthaura and Kenyatta, ICC-01/09-02/11-698, TC V, 19 March 2013

Situation in Uganda (ICC-02/04)

Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for Leave to Appeal the Decision on Victims’ Applications for Participation a/0010/06, a/0064/06 to a/0070/06, a/0081/06 to a/0104/06 and a/0111/06 to a/0127/06, Situation in Uganda, ICC-02/04-112, PTC II, 19 December 2007

Joseph Kony, Vincent Otti, Okot Odhiambo and Dominic Ongwen (ICC-02/04-01/05) Decision on the Prosecutor’s Position on the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber II to Redact

Factual Descriptions of Crimes in the Warrants of Arrest, Motion for Reconsideration, and Motion for Clarification, Prosecutor v. Kony, Otti, Odhiambo and Ongwen, ICC-02/04-01/05-60, PTC II, ICC, 28 October 2005

Decision on Prosecutor’s Applications for Leave to Appeal Dated the 15th day of March 2006, Prosecutor v. Kony, Otti, Odhiambo and Ongwen, ICC-02/04-01/05-90-US-Exp, PTC II, 10 July 2006

xli

Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ)

Polish Postal Service in Danzig, Advisory Opinion, 16 May 1925, PCIJ, Series B, No. 11

International Court of Justice (ICJ)

Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), Judgment, ICJ, 14 February 2002, ICJ Reports 2002

Competence of the Assembly Regarding Admission to the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, ICJ, 3 March 1950, ICJ Reports 1950

Continental Shelf Case (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta), Judgement, ICJ, 3 June 1985, ICJ Reports 1985

Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 between the World Health Organization and Egypt, Advisory Opinion, ICJ, 20 December 1980, ICJ Reports 1980

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ, 8 July 1996, ICJ Reports 1996

Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. US), Judgment, ICJ, 27 June 2008, ICJ Report 1986

North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. The Netherlands), Judgment, ICJ, 20 February 1969, ICJ Reports 1969

Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, ICJ, 11 April 1949, ICJ Reports 1949

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

Akayesu (ICTR-96-4)

Decision by the Tribunal on Its Request to the Prosecutor to Submit Written Witness Statements, Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T, TC, 28 January 1997

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion to Reconsider and Rescind the Order of 28 January 1997, Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T, TC I, 6 March 1997

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T, TC I, 2 September 1998 Sentence, Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T, TC I, 2 October 1998 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4-A, AC, 1 June 2001

Bagaragaza (ICTR-05-86)

Decision on Rule 11bis Appeal, Prosecutor v. Bagaragaza, Case No. ICTR-2005-86-AR11bis, AC, 30 August 2006

Decision on Prosecutor’s Extremely Urgent Motion for Revocation of the Referral to the Kingdom of the Netherlands Pursuant to Rule 11bis (F) & (G), Prosecutor v. Bagaragaza, Case No. ICTR-2005-86-11bis, TC III, 17 August 2007

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Bagaragaza, Case No. ICTR-2005-86-S, TC II, 17 November 2009

Bagilishema (ICTR-95-1A) Judgement, Prosecutor v. Bagilishema, Case No. ICTR-95-1A-T, TC I, 7 June 2001

xlii

Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva (ICTR-98-41)

Decision on Defence Motions of Nsengiyumva, Kabiligi, and Ntabakuze Challenging the Prosecution’s Pre-Trial Brief and on the Prosecutor’s Counter-Motion, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 23 May 2002

Decision on Postponement of Defence of Accused Kabiligi, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 21 April 2005

Order for Reduction of Prosecutor’s Witness List, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 8 April 2003

Decision on Prosecution Motion for Addition of Witness Pursuant to Rule 73 bis (E), Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 26 June 2003

Decision on Prosecutor’s Motion for Leave to Vary the Witness List Pursuant to Rule 73bis(E), Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 21 May 2004

Decision on Motions for Judgement of Acquittal, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 2 February 2005

Decision on Request for Certification Concerning Sufficiency of Defence Witness Summaries, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 21 July 2005

Decision on the Prosecution Motion to Recall Witness Nyanjwa, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 29 September 2004

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-96-41-T, TC I, 9 May 2005

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 18 October 2005

Decision on the Joint Defence Motion for an Update of the Prosecution’s Pre-Trial Brief, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 2 November 2004

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 11 April 2005

Decision on Sufficiency of Defence Witness Summaries, Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 5 July 2005

Decision on Defence Motion to Amend the Defence Witness List, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 17 February 2006

Decision on Request for Severance of Three Accused, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 27 March 2006

Decision on Modalities for Examination of Defence Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 26 April 2005

Decision on Nsengiyumva Motion for Leave to Amend Its Witness List, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 6 June 2006

Decision on Request for Subpoena, Prosecutor v. Bagosora et al., Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 11 September 2006

Decision on Aloys Ntabakuze’s Interlocutory Appeal on Questions of Law Raised by the 29 June 2006 Trial Chamber I Decision on Motion for Exclusion of Evidence,

xliii

Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-AR73, AC, 18 September 2006

Decision on Bagosora Motion to Present Additional Witnesses and Vary its Witness List, Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze, and Nsengiyumva, Case No. ICTR-98-41-T, TC I, 17 November 2006

Barayagwiza (ICTR-97-19)

Decision, Barayagwiza v. Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-97-19-AR72, AC, 3 November 1999

Decision (Prosecutor’s Request for Review or Reconsideration), Barayagwiza v. Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-97-19-AR72, AC, 31 March 2000

Decision on Defence Counsel Motion to Withdraw, Prosecutor v. Barayagwiza, Case No. ICTR-97-19-T, TC I, 2 November 2000

Bikindi (ICTR-2001-72)

Decision on Motion for Protective Measures, Variation of the Witness List…, Prosecutor v. Bikindi, Case No. ICTR-2001-72-T, TC III, 5 February 2007

Bisengimana (ICTR-00-60)

Judgement and Sentence, Prosecutor v. Bisengimana, Case No. ICTR-00-60-T, TC II, 13 April 2006

Casimir Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza (ICTR-99-50)

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No. ICTR-99-50-T, TC II, 6 November 2003

Decision on Prosecutor’s Very Urgent Motion Pursuant to Rule 73bis (E) to Vary the Prosecutor’s List of Witnesses Filed on 25 May 2004 (TC), Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No. ICTR-99-50-T, TC II, 3 September 2004

Decision on Bicamumpaka and Mugenzi’s Motion for Specificity in the Pre-Trial Brief, Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No. ICTR-99-50-T, TC II, 24 November 2004

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No. ICTR-99-50-T, TC II, 30 August 2006

Decision on Casimir Bizimungu’s Requests for Disclosure of the Bruguière Report and the Cooperation of France, Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No. ICTR-99-45-T, TC II, 25 September 2006

Decision on Prosecution Motion for Full Compliance with rule 73 ter and Variation of Chamber’s Decision of 27 June 2005, Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No ICTR-99-50-T, TC II, 20 November 2006

Decision on Prosper Mugiraneza’s Second Motion to Dismiss for Deprivation of his Right to Trial Without Undue Delay, Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No. ICTR-99-50-T, TC II, 29 May 2007

xliv

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No. ICTR-99-50-T, TC II, 13 August 2007

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No. ICTR-99-50-T, TC II, 18 February 2008

Decision on Prosper Mugiraneza’s Motion for Leave to File Documents Out of Time and Order for Further Reducing of Witness List, Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No. ICTR-99-50-T, TC II, 20 February 2008

Decision on Prosper Mugiraneza’s Motion to Vary his Witness List…, Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No. ICTR-99-50-T, TC II, 5 June 2008

Decision on Prosper Mugiraneza’s Emergency Motion to Recall Witnesses for Further Testimony, Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No. ICTR-99-50-T, TC II, 5 June 2008

Decision on Casimir Bizimungu’s Motion to Vary Witness List; and to Admit Evidence of Witness in Written Form in Lieu of Oral Testimony, Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No. ICTR-99-50-T, TC II, 1 May 2009

Decision on Prosper Mugiraneza’s Fourth Motion to Dismiss Indictment for Violation of Right to Trial without Undue Delay, Prosecutor v. C. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka, and Mugiraneza, Case No. ICTR-99-50-T, TC II, 23 June 2010

Gatete (ICTR-00-61)

Scheduling Order, Prosecutor v. Gatete, Case No. ICTR-00-61-PT, TC III, 11 August 2009

Hategekimana (ICTR-00-55B)

Scheduling Order with Regard to Closing Briefs and Closing Arguments, Prosecutor v. Hategekimana, Case No. ICTR-00-55B-T, TC II, 19 October 2009

Decision Regarding Motions for Extension of Time to File Closing Briefs and to Present Closing Arguments, Prosecutor v. Hategekimana, Case No. ICTR-00-55B-T, TC II, 13 January 2010

Kajelijeli (ICTR-98-44A)

Decision on the Prosecution Motion for Leave to Call Rebuttal Evidence, Prosecutor v. Kajelijeli, Case No. ICTR-98-44A-T, TC II, 12 May 2003

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Kajelijeli, Case No. ICTR-98-44A-A, AC, 23 May 2005

Kalimanzira (ICTR-05-88)

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Kalimanzira, Case No. ICTR-05-88-I, TC III, 5 May 2008

Decision on Defence Motion to Exclude Prosecution Witnesses BWM, BWN, BXB, BXC, BXD and BXL, Prosecutor v. Kalimanzira, Case No. ICTR-05-88-T, TC III, 24 June 2008

xlv

Consolidated Decision on Prosecution Motion Concerning Defence Compliance with Rule 73ter and Defence Motions to Vary Witness Lists, Prosecutor v. Kalimanzira, Case No. ICTR-05-88-T, TC III, 12 November 2008

Kambanda (ICTR-97-23)

Judgement and Sentence, Prosecutor v. Kambanda, Case No. ICTR 97-23-S, TC I, 4 September 1998

Kamuhanda (ICTR-99-54A)

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion to Add Witnesses GKI, GKJ and GKL, Prosecutor v. Kamuhanda, Case No. ICTR-99-54A-T, TC II, 6 February 2002

Decision on Kamuhanda’s Motion for Partial Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Prosecutor v. Kamuhanda, Case No. ICTR-99-54A-T, TC II, 20 August 2002

Kanyarukiga (ICTR-2002-78)

Decision on the Prosecutor’s request for Referral to the Republic of Rwanda, Prosecutor v. Kanyarukiga, Case No. ICTR-2002-78-R11bis, Referral Chamber, 6 June 2008

Kanyabashi (ICTR-96-15)

Joint and Separate Opinion of Judge McDonald and Judge Vohrah, Appeal Chamber Decision, Prosecutor v. Kanyabashi, Case No. ICTR-96-15-A, AC, 3 June 1999

Decision on Kanyabashi’s Motion to Re-open his Case and to Recall Prosecution Witness QA, Prosecutor v. Kanyabashi, Case No. ICTR-96-15-T (Joint Case No. ICTR-98-42-T), TC II, 2 July 2008

Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera (ICTR-98-44)

Minutes, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Rwamakuba, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-1998-4-T, TC III, 27 November 2003

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Rwamakuba, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC III, 1 April 2004

Decision on the Continuation of Trial, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Rwamakuba, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC III, 16 July 2004

Decision on Severance of André Rwamakuba and Amendments to the Indictment, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, Nzirorera, and Rwamakuba, Case No. ICTR-98-44-PT, TC III, 7 December 2004

Decision on Variance of the Prosecution Witness List, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. 98-44-T, TC III, 13 December 2005

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Interlocutory Appeal of Decision on Judicial Notice, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73(C), AC, 16 June 2006

Decision on Prosecutor’s Motion to Vary its Witness List (TC), Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC III, 2 October 2006

xlvi

Decision on Prosecution Motion for Admission of Evidence of Rape and Sexual Assault Pursuant to Rule 92 bis of the Rules; and Order for Reduction of Prosecution Witness List, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, TC III, 11 December 2006

Decision on Defence Motion for Subpoenas to Prosecution Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC III, 10 May 2007

Decision on Motions for Judgement of Acquittal, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC III, 19 March 2008

Decision on Joseph Nzirorera and Edouard Karemera’s Motions for No Case to Answer, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC III, 19 March 2008

Decision on Prosecutor’s Submission Concerning Edouard Karemera’s Compliance with Rule 73ter and Chamber’s Orders, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC III, 2 April 2008

Decision on Matthieu Ngirumpatse’s Request for Extension of Time to File Rule 73 ter Materials, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC III, 2 April 2008

Decision on the Prosecution Motion to Reopen its Case and on the Defence Motion to File Another Rule 98bis Motion, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC I, 19 April 2008

Minutes, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-1998-4-T, TC III, 21 April 2008

Order on Mathieu Ngirumpatse’s Brief Following the 17 April 2008 Decision on the Presentation of the Defence Evidence, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC III, 25 June 2008

Order to Joseph Nzirorera to Reduce his Witness List, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC III, 24 October 2008

Decision on Joseph Nzirorera’s Motions for Reconsideration of 24 October 2008 Order, for Extension of Time, Subpoenas and Video-Link and on Prosecution’s Motion for an Order to Nzirorera to Reduce His Witness List, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC III, 2 December 2008

Decision on Mathieu Ngirumpatse’s Appeal from the Trial Chamber Decision of 17 September 2008, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73.14, AC, 30 January 2009

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Notice of Deficiencies in Joseph Nzirorera’s Rule 73 ter Filings and Motion for Remedial Measures, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC III, 17 February 2009

Decision on Mathieu Ngirumpatse’s Motions for Reconsideration and Extension of Time-Limits for the Presentation of his Case, Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, and Nzirorera, Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, TC III, 17 September 2008

Karera (ICTR-01-74)

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Karera, Case No. ICTR-01-74-T, TC I, 9 January 2006

Decision on Defence Motion for Additional Disclosure (Rule 98), Prosecutor v. Karera, Case No. ICTR-01-74-T, TC I, ICTR, 1 September 2006

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Karera, Case No. ICTR-01-74-T, TC, 7 December 2007 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Karera, Case No. ICTR-01-74-A, AC, 2 February 2009

xlvii

Kayishema and Ruzindana (ICTR-95-1)

Decision on the Defence Motion for the Re-Examination of Defence Witness DE (TC), Prosecutor v. Kayishema and Ruzindana, Case No. ICTR-95-1-T, TC II, 19 August 1998

Mpambara (ICTR-01-65)

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Mpambara, Case No. ICTR-01-65-T, TC I, 19 September 2005

Decision on the Defence’s Motion for Judgement of Acquittal, Prosecutor v. Mpambara, Case No. ICTR-2001-65-T, TC I, 21 October 2005

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Mpambara, Case No. ICTR-01-65-T, TC I, 9 January 2006

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Mpambara, Case No. ICTR-01-65-T, TC I, 11 September 2006

Muhimana ( ICTR-95-1B)

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Muhimana, Case No. ICTR-95-1B-T, TC III, 29 March 2004

Munyakazi (ICTR-97-36)

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Request for Referral of Case to the Republic of Rwanda, Prosecutor v. Munyakazi, Case No. ICTR-97-36-R11bis, Referral Chamber, 28 May 2008

Decision on Defence Extremely Urgent Motion for Extension of Time Limit to File Its Closing Brief, Prosecutor v. Munyakazi, Case No. ICTR-9 7-36A-T, TC I, 2 December 2009

Munyeshyaka (ICTR-05-87)

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Request for the Referral of Wenceslas Munyeshyaka’s Indictment to France, Prosecutor v. Munyeshyaka, Case No. ICTR-2005-87-I, Referral Chamber, 20 November 2007

Musema (ICTR-96-13)

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Request for Leave to Call Six New Witnesses (TC), Prosecutor v. Musema, Case No. ICTR-96-13-T, TC, 20 April 1999

Judgement and sentence, Prosecutor v. Musema, Case No. ICTR-96-13-A, TC I, 27 January 2000

xlviii

Muvunyi (ICTR-2000-55A)

Decision on Tharcisse Muvunyi’s Motion for Judgement of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98bis, Prosecutor v. Muvunyi, Case No. ICTR-2000-55A-T, TC II, 13 October 2005

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion for Disclosure of Identifying Information Concerning Defence Witnesses Pursuant to Rules 69 (C) and 73 ter, Prosecutor v. Muvunyi, Case No. ICTR-2000-55A-T, TC II, 9 November 2005

Decision on Accused’s Motion to Expand and Vary the Witness List, Prosecutor v. Muvunyi, Case No. ICTR-2000-55A-T, TC II, 28 March 2006

Nahimana, Barayagwiza, and Ngeze (ICTR-99-52)

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Oral Motion for Leave to Amend the List of Selected Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Ngeze, and Barayagwiza, Case ICTR-99-52-I, TC I, 26 June 2001

Reasons for Oral Decision of 17 September 2002 on the Motions for Acquittal, Prosecutor v. Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Ngeze, and Barayagwiza, Case No. ICTR-99-52-T, TC I, 25 September 2002

Decision on the Defence’s Application under Rule 73ter(E) for Leave to Call Additional Defence Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Case No. ICTR-99-52-T, TC I, 9 October 2002

Decision on Prosecutor’s Motion to Compel the Defence’s Compliance with Rules 73ter, 67 (C) and 69 (C), Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Ngeze, and Barayagwiza, Case No. ICTR-99-52-T, TC I, 3 October 2002

Decision on the Defence Motion to Re-Instate the List of Witnesses for Ferdinand Nahimana, Pursuant to Rule 73ter, Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Barayagwiza, and Ngeze, Case No. ICTR-99-52-T, TC I, 13 December 2002

Decision on the Defence’s Extremely Urgent Motion to Reconsider the Scheduling Order Dated 26 March 2003 on the Following Direction for the Remaining Defence Factual Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Ngeze, and Barayagwiza, Case No. ICTR-99-52-T, TC I, 11 April 2003

Decision of 9 May 2003 on the Prosecutor’s Application for Rebuttal Witnesses as Corrected According to the Order of 13 May 2003, Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Barayagwiza, and Ngeze, Case No. ICTR-99-52-T, TC I, 13 May 2003

Decision on Hassan Ngeze’s Request for a Status Conference, Nahimana, Barayagwiza, and Ngeze v. Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, AC, 13 December 2005

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Barayagwiza, and Ngeze, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, AC, 28 November 2007

Nchamihigo

Decision on Defence Motion for Extension of Time for Complying with Chamber’s Scheduling Order of 5 February 2007 and Scheduling the Presentation of the Defence Case, Prosecutor v. Nchamihigo, Case No. ICTR-2001-63-T, TC III, 19 March 2007

xlix

Ndindiliyimana, Augustine Bizimungu, Nzuwonemeye, and Sahagutu (ICTR-2000-56)

Decision on Prosecution Motion to Vary Its List of Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Ndindiliyimana, A. Bizimungu, Nzuwonemeye, and Sahagutu, Case No. ICTR-2000-56-T, TC II, 11 February 2005

Decision on the Prosecution’s Motion dated 9 August 2005 to Vary its List of Witnesses Pursuant to Rule 73bis (E), Prosecutor v. A. Bizimungu, Ndindiliyimana, Nzuwonemeye, and Sahagutu, Case No. ICTR-2000-56-T, TC II, 21 September 2005

Decision on Defence Motions for Judgement of Acquittal, Prosecutor v. Ndindiliyimana, A. Bizimungu, Nzuwonemeye, and Sahagutu, Case No. ICTR-00-56-T, TC II, 20 March 2007

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Ndindiliyimana, A. Bizimungu, Nzuwonemeye, and Sahagutu, Case No. ICTY-00-56-T, TC II ICTR, 16 April 2007, Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Ndindiliyimana, A. Bizimungu, Nzuwonemeye, and Sahagutu, Case No. ICTY-00-56-T, TC II, 16 April 2007

Decision on Prosecutor’s Extremely Urgent Motion for Disclosure of Further Identifying Information Relating to Defence Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Ndindiliyimana, A. Bizimungu, Nzuwonemeye, and Sahagutu, Case No. ICTR-2000-56-T, TC II, 17 April 2007

Decision on Augustin Bizimungu’s Request to Vary His Witness List, Prosecutor v. Ndindiliyimana, A. Bizimungu, Nzuwonemeye, and Sahagutu, Case No. ICTR-00-56-T, TC II, 24 October 2007

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Ndindiliyimana, A. Bizimungu, Nzuwonemeye, and Sahagutu, Case No. ICTY-00-56-T, TC II, 16 January 2008

Decision on Nzuwonemeye’s Request to Vary his Witness List, Prosecutor v. Ndindiliyimana, A. Bizimungu, Nzuwonemeye, and Sahagutu, Case No. ICTR-2000-56-T, TC II, 31 January 2008

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Ndindiliyimana, A. Bizimungu, Nzuwonemeye, and Sahagutu, Case No. ICTY-00-56-T, TC II, 23 June 2008

Ngirabatware (ICTR-99-54)

Decision on Defence Motion to Strike the Prosecutor’s Request to Augustin Ngirabatware to Admit Facts Pursuant to Rule 73 bis(B)(ii) of the Rules, Prosecutor v. Ngirabatware, Case No. ICTR-99-54-T, TC II, 26 March 2009

Decision on Defence Motion Objecting to the Prosecution’s Pre-Trial Brief, Prosecutor v. Ngirabatware, Case No. ICTR-99-54-T, TC II, 2 June 2009

Decision on Defence Motions Objecting to the Prosecution’s Pre-Trial Brief, Prosecutor v. Ngirabatware, Case No. ICTR-99-54-T, TC II, 25 June 2009

Niyitegeka (ICTR-96-14)

Decision on the Defence Motion for Disclosure of Evidence, Prosecutor v. Niyitegeka, Case No. ICTR-96-14-I, TC II, 4 February 2000

l

Nsabimana (ICTR-97-29A)

Decision on the Defence Motion for the Review of the Decision of 9 May 2000 and for the Scheduling of a Status Conference, Prosecutor v. Nsabimana, Case No. ICTR-97-29A-T, TC II, 20 November 2000

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Urgent Motion to Compel Disclosure of Unredacted Witness Statements by Nsabimana Defence, Prosecutor v. Nsabimana, Case No. ICTR-98-42-T, TC II, ICTR, 29 June 2006

Nsengimana (ICTR-01-67)

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Nsengimana, Case No. ICTR-01-69-T, TC I, 22 June 2007

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Nsengimana, Case No. ICTR-01-69-T, TC I, 2 June 2008

Ntagerura, Bagambiki, and Imanishimwe (ICTR-99-46)

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Ntagerura, Bagambiki, and Imanishimwe, Case No. ICTR-99-46-T, TC III, 6 March 2002 (Dissenting opinion of Judge Dolenc),

Separate and Concurring Decision of Judge Williams on Imanishimwe’s Defence Motion for Judgement of Acquittal on Count of Conspiracy to Commit Genocide Pursuant to Rule 98 bis, Prosecutor v. Ntagerura, Bagambiki, and Imanishimwe, Case No. ICTR-99-46-T, TC III, ICTR, 13 March 2002

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion for Leave to Call Evidence in Rebuttal Pursuant to Rules 54, 73, and 85 (A) (iii)…, Prosecutor v. Ntagerura, Bagambiki, and Imanishimwe, Case ICTR-99-46-T, TC III, 21 May 2003

E. Ntakirutimana and G. Ntakirutimana (ICTR-96-10 and ICTR-96-17)

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts, Prosecutor v. Ntakirutimana and Ntakirutimana, Cases Nos ICTR-96-10-T and ICTR-96-17, TC I, 22 November 2001

Ntawukulilyayo (ICTR-05-82)

Order for the Defence to Reduce its List of Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Ntawukulilayo, Case No. ICTR-05-82-T, TC III, 21 August 2009

Decision on Defence Motion for Leave to Vary its Witness List to Add Three Witnesses…, Prosecutor v. Ntawukulilayo, Case No. ICTR-05-82-T, TC III, 30 September 2009

Decision on Defence Motion for an Extension of Time for the Filing of its Closing Brief, Prosecutor v. Ntawukulilyayo, Case No. ICTR-05-82-T, TC III, 11 February 2010

Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye

(ICTR-97-21, ICTR-97-21, ICTR-96-15, ICTR-96-8 - joint case ICTR-98-42)

Decision on the Full Disclosure of the Identity and Unredacted Statements of the Protected Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana,

li

Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case No. ICTR-97-21-T, TC II, 8 June 2001

Decision on Defence Motion for Acquittal under Rule 98 bis, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case No. ICTR-97-21-T et al., TC II, 16 December 2004

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case No. ICTR-98-42-T, TC II, 31 January 2005

Decision on the Defence Motion to Modify the List of Defence Witnesses for Arsène Shalom Ntahobali, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case No. ICTR-98-42-T, TC II, 26 August 2005

Decision on Alphonse Nteziryayo’s Motion to Modify His Witness List, Prosecutor v. Nteziryayo, Case No. ICTR-97-29A-T, TC II, 14 July 2006

Scheduling Order, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case No. ICTR-98-42-T, TC II, 9 November 2006

Minutes of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case No. ICTR-98-42-T, TC II, 10 July 2007

Decision on Joseph Kanyabashi’s Appeal against the Decision of trial Chamber II of 21 March 2007 concerning the Dismissal of Motions to Vary his Witness List, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case No. ICTR-98-42-AR73, AC, 21 August 2007

Decision on Kanyabashi’s Motion to Vary his List of Witnesses Pursuant to Rule 73ter, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case No. ICTR-98-42-T, TC II, 15 February 2008

Decision on Ndayambaje’s Motion to Vary his List of Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case No. ICTR-98-42-T, TC II, 15 April 2008

Decision on Kanyabashi’s Three Motions to Vary his List of Witnesses and to Admit Written Statements under Rule 92 bis, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case No. ICTR-98-42-T, TC II, 24 April 2008

Decision on Ndayambaje’s Motion to Vary his List of Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case No. ICTR-98-42-T, TC II, 4 June 2008

Decision on the Parties Oral Motions to Review the Timeframes and Length of Closing Briefs of the 2 July 2008 Scheduling Order, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case No. ICTR-98-42-T, TC II, 29 August 2008

Decision on Ntahobali’s Motion for Exclusion of Evidence or for Recall of Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case No. ICTR-98-42-T, TC II, 19 January 2009

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi, and Ndayambaye, Case ICTR-98-42-T, TC II, 30 April 2009

Nzabirinda

Judgment and Sentence, Prosecutor v. Nzabirinda, Case No. ICTR-2001-77-T, TC II, 23 February 2007

lii

Nzabonimana (ICTR-98-44D)

Decision on Defence Motion for the Recall of Witness CNAI, Prosecutor v.

Nzabonimana, Case No. ICTR-98-44D-T, TC III, 25 June 2010

Renzaho

Minutes, Prosecutor v. Renzaho, Case No. ICTR-97-31-T, TC I, 8 January 2007 Decision on Defence Request to Amend Witness List, Prosecutor v. Renzaho, Case No.

ICTR-97-31-T, TC I, 12 July 2007

Rugambarara (ICTR-00-59)

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Rugambarara, Case No. ICTR-00-59-T, TC II, 16 November 2007

Ruggiu (ICTR-97-32)

Sentence, Prosecutor v. Ruggiu, Case No. ICTR-97-32-I, TC I, 1 June 2000

Rukundo (ICTR-2001-70)

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motions for Variation of Witness List and Protective Measures for Witnesses BUW, CCF,CCJ and BLJ, Prosecutor v. Rukundo, Case No. ICTR-2001-70-T, TC II, 14 February 2007

Decision on Defence Motion to Recall Prosecution Witness BLP, Prosecutor v. Rukundo, Case No. ICTR-2001-70-T, TC II, 30 April 2007

Decision on Defence Motion for Judgement of Acquittal pursuant to Rule 98 bis, Prosecutor v. Rukundo, Case No. ICTR-2001-70-T, TC II, 22 May 2007

Decision on the Defence Motions for Additional Time to Disclose Witnesses’ Identifying Information, to Vary Its Witness List…, Prosecutor v. Rukundo, Case No. ICTR-2001-70-T, TC II, 11 September 2007

Minutes, Prosecutor v. Rukundo, Case No. ICTR-01-70, TC II, 20 February 2008

Rutaganda (ICTR-96-3)

Judgement and Sentence, Prosecutor v. Rutaganda, Case No. ICTR-96-3-T, TC I, 6 December 1999

Judgement, Rutaganda v. Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-96-3-A, AC, 26 May 2003 (with Separate Opinion of Judges Meron and Jorda; Separate Opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen; and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Pocar)

Rutaganira (ICTR-95-1C)

Judgement and Sentence, Prosecutor v. Rutaganira, Case No. ICTR-95-1C-T, TC III, 14 March 2005

liii

Rwamakuba (ICTR-98-44C)

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Rwamakuba, Case No. ICTR-98-44C-T, TC III, 20 September 2006

Decision on Appropriate Remedy, Prosecutor v. Rwamakuba, Case No. ICTR-98-44C-T, TC III, 31 January 2007

Semanza (ICTR-97-20)

Decision, Prosecutor v. Semanza, Case No. ICTR-97-20, TC, 31 May 2000 Decision on the Defence Motion for Extension of Time for Filing the List of Defence

Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Semanza, Case No. ICTR-97-20-T, TC III, 4 September 2001

Decision on Defence Motion for Orders Calling Prosecution Witness VZ listed in Prosecution Witness List of November 2000, Prosecutor v. Semanza, Case No. ICTR-97-20-T, TC III, 6 September 2001

Decision on the Defence Motion for a Judgement of Acquittal in Respect of Laurent Semanza after Quashing the Counts Contained in the Third Amended Indictment (Article 98bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence) and Decision on the Prosecutor’s Urgent Motion for Suspension of Time-Limit for Response to The Defence Motion for a Judgement of Acquittal, Prosecutor v. Semanza, Case No. ICTR-97-20-T, TC III, 27 September 2001

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion for Leave to Call Rebuttal Evidence and the Prosecutor’s Supplementary Motion for Leave to Call Rebuttal Evidence, Prosecutor v. Semanza, Case No. ICTR-97-20-T, TC III, 27 March 2002

Decision on Defence Motion for Leave to Call Rejoinder Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Semanza, Case No. ICTR-97-20-T, TC III, 30 April 2002

Judgement, Semanza v. Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-97-20-A, AC, 20 May 2005

Seromba (ICTR-2001-66)

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Seromba, Case No. ICTR-01-66-A, AC, 12 March 2008

Serugendo (ICTR-2005-84)

Judgement and Sentence, Prosecutor v. Serugendo, Case No. ICTR-2005-84-I, TC I, 12 June 2006

Serushago (ICTR-98-39)

Sentence, Prosecutor v. Serushago, Case No. ICTR-98-39-S, TC I, 5 February 1999

liv

Sikubwabo (ICTR-95-1D)

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Request for Referral of the Case to the Republic of Rwanda, Prosecutor v. Sikubwabo, Case No. ICTR-95-1D-R11bis, Referral Chamber, 26 March 2012

Uwinkindi (ICTR-2001-75)

Decision on Prosecutor’s Request for Referral to the Republic of Rwanda, Prosecutor v. Uwinkindi, Case No. ICTR-2001-75-R11bis, Referral Chamber, 28 June 2011

Zigiranyirazo (ICTR-2001-73)

Decision on Defence Motion to Exclude Some Parts of the Prosecution Pre-Trial Brief, Prosecutor v. Zigiranyirazo, Case No. ICTR-2001-73-PT, TC I, 30 September 2005

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion to Vary His Witness List, Prosecutor v. Zigiranyirazo, Case No. ICTR-2001-73-T, TC III, 19 January 2006

Decision on the Prosecution Joint Motion for Re-Opening its Case… , Prosecutor v. Zigiranyirazo, Case No. ICTR-2001-73-T, TC III, 16 November 2006

Decision on the Defence Motion Pursuant to Rule 98bis, Prosecutor v. Zigiranyirazo, Case No. ICTR-2001-73-T, TC III, 21 February 2007

Decision on the Defence Motion to Vary the Defence Witness List, Prosecutor v. Zigiranyirazo, Case No. ICTR-2001-73-T, TC III, 28 March 2007

Decision on the Defence Motion to Vary the Defence Witness list to Add M. Gaspard Musabyimana, Prosecutor v. Zigiranyirazo, Case No. ICTR-2001-73-T, TC III, 13 April 2007

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Zigiranyirazo, Case No. ICTR-01-73-T, TC III, 18 December 2008

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

Aleksovski (IT-95-14/1)

Scheduling Order, Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, Case No. IT-95-14/1-PT, TC I, 3 December 1997

Decision on Prosecutor’s Appeal on Admissibility of Evidence, Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, Case No. IT-95-14/1-AR73, AC, 16 February 1999

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, Case No. IT-95-14/1, TC I, 22 March 1999 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, Case No. IT-95-14/1-A, AC, 24 March 2000

Babić (IT-03-72)

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Babić, Case No. IT-03-72-S, TC I, 29 June 2004 Judgement on Sentencing Appeal, Prosecutor v. Babić, Case No. IT-03-72-A, AC, 18

July 2005

lv

Banović (IT-02-65/1)

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Banović, Case No. IT-02-65/1-S, TC II, 28 October 2003

Blagojević and Jokić (IT-02-60)

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Blagojević, Jokić, and M. Nikolić, Case No. IT-02-60-PT, TC II, 19 July 2002

Decision on Joint Defence Motion for Reconsideration of Trial Chamber’s Decision to Review All Discovery Materials Provided to the Accused by the Prosecution, Prosecutor v. Blagojević, Jokić, and M. Nikolić, Case No. IT-02-60-PT, TC II, 21 January 2003

Decision on Joint Defence Motions for Certification of Decision on Joint Defence Motions for Reconsideration of Trial Chamber’s Decision to Review All Discovery Materials Provided to the Accused by the Prosecution, and Request for Stay of Execution of Decision, Prosecutor v. Blagojević, Jokić, and M. Nikolić, Case No. IT-02-60-PT, TC II, 10 February 2003

Decision, Prosecutor v. Blagojević, Jokić, and M. Nikolić, Cases Nos IT-02-60-AR73, IT-02-60-AR73.2, IT-02-60-AR73.3, AC, 8 April 2003 (see also under M. Nikolić)

Annex, Guidelines on the Standards Governing the Admission of Evidence, Prosecutor v. Blagojević and Jokić, Case No. IT-02-60-PT, TC I Section A, 23 April 2003

First Decision on Prosecution’s Motion for Admission of Witness Statements and Prior Testimony Pursuant to Rule 92bis, Prosecutor v. Blagojević and Jokić, Case No. IT-02-60-T, TC I Section A, 12 June 2003

Judgement on Motions for Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98 bis, Prosecutor v. Blagojević and Jokić, Case No. IT-02-60-T, TC I Section A, 5 April 2004

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Blagojević and Jokić, Case No. IT-02-60-T, TC I Section A, 17 June 2004

Decision on Vidoje Blagojević’s Oral Request, Prosecutor v. Blagojević and Jokić, Case No. IT-02-60-T, TC I, Section A, 30 July 2004

Decision on the Prosecution’s Alternative Request to Admit Evidence in Rebuttal and Incorporated Motion to Admit Evidence Under Rule 92 bis in its Case on Rebuttal and to Re-Open its Case for a Limited Purpose, Prosecutor v. Blagojević and Jokić, Case No. IT-02-60-T, TC, 13 September 2004

Decision on Motion to Seek Leave to Respond to the Prosecution’s Final Brief, Prosecutor v. Blagojević and Jokić, Case No. IT-02-60-T, TC I Section A, 28 September 2004

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Blagojević and Jokić, Case No. IT-02-60-T, TC, 17 January 2005

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Blagojević and Jokić, Case No. IT-02-60-A, AC, 9 May 2007 (with Partially Dissenting Opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen)

Blaškić (IT-95-14)

Decision on the Application of the Prosecutor Dated 17 October 1996 Requesting Protective Measures for Victims and Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Case No. IT-95-14-T, TC I, 5 November 1996

lvi

Decision on the Defence Motion to Dismiss the Indictment Based upon Defects in the Form Thereof (Vagueness/Lack of Adequate Notice of Charges), Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Case No. IT-95-14-T, TC, 4 April 1997

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Case No. IT-95-14, TC, 24 June 1997 Decision on the Objection of the Republic of Croatia to the Issuance of Subpoenae Duces

Tecum, Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Case No. IT-95-14-PT, TC I, 18 July 1997 Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion for Seven (7) Days Advance Disclosure of Defence

Witnesses and Defence Witness Statements, Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Case No. IT-95-14-T, TC I, 3 September 1998

Decision of Trial Chamber I on the Defence Motion to Dismiss, Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Case IT-95-14-T, TC I, 3 September 1998

Decision of Trial Chamber I in respect of the Appearance of General Enver Hadžihasanović, Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Case No. IT-95-14-T, TC I, 25 March 1999

Decision of Trial Chamber I in Respect of the Appearance of General Philippe Morillon, Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Case No. IT-95-14-T, TC I, 25 March 1999

Decision of Trial Chamber I in Respect of the Appearance of Mr. Jean-Pierre Thébault, Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Case No. IT-95-14-T, TC I, 25 March 1999

Decision of Trial Chamber I to Call Colonel Amir Kubura as a Witness of the Trial Chamber, Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Case No. IT-95-14-T, TC I, 21 May 1999

Decision of Trial Chamber I Summoning Mr. Robert Stewart as a Witness of the Trial Chamber, Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Case No. IT-95-14-T, TC I, 19 May 1999

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Case No. IT-95-14-T, TC I, 3 March 2000

Boskoski and Tarculovski (IT-04-82)

Decision on Review of the Indictment, Prosecutor v. Boškoski and Tarčulovski, Case No. IT-04-82-I, Judge Robinson, 9 March 2005

Decision on Prosecution’s Motion for Admission of Exhibits from the Bar Table with Confidential Annexes A to E, Prosecutor v. Boškoski and Tarčulovski, Case No. IT-04-82-T, TC II, 14 May 2007

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Boskoski and Tarčulovski, Case No. IT-04-82, TC II, 30 January 2008

Bralo (IT-95-17)

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Bralo, Case No. IT-95-17-S, TC, 7 December 2005 Judgement on Sentencing Appeal, Prosecutor v. Bralo, Case No. IT-95-17-A, AC, 2 April 2007

Brđanin and Talić (IT-99-36)

Decision on Application by Momir Talić for the Disqualification and Withdrawal of a Judge, Prosecutor v. Brđanin and Talić, Case No. IT-99-36-T, TC II, 18 May 2000

Decision on Motion by Prosecution on Protective Measures, Prosecutor v. Brđanin and Talić, Case No. IT-99-36-T, TC II, 3 July 2000

lvii

Decision on Prosecution’s Response to ‘Defendant Brđanin Pre-Trial Brief’, Prosecutor v. Brđanin and Talić, Case No. IT-99-36-PT, TC II, 14 January 2002

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Brđanin and Talić, Case IT-99-36, TC II, 23 January 2002 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Brđanin and Talić, Case IT-99-36, TC II, 24 January 2002 Order on the Standards Governing the Admission of Evidence, Prosecutor v. Brđanin

and Talić, Case No. IT-99-36-T, TC II, 15 February 2002 Decision on ‘Motion to Declare Rule 90(H)(ii) Void to the Extent it is in Violation of Art.

21 of the Statute of the International Tribunal’ by the Accused Radoslav Brđanin…, Prosecutor v. Brđanin and Talić, Case No. IT-99-36-T, TC II, 22 March 2002

Decision on the Interlocutory Appeal against a Decision of the Trial Chamber, as of Right, Prosecutor v. Brđanin and Talić, Case No. IT-99-36-AR-73.7, AC, 6 June 2002

Decision on Motion to Set Aside Confidential Subpoena to Give Evidence, Prosecutor v. Brđanin and Talić, Case No. IT-99-36, TC II, 7 June 2002

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Brđanin and Talić, Case No. IT-99-36-T, TC II, 14 October 2002

Decision on Interlocutory Appeal, Prosecutor v. Brđanin and Talić, Case No. IT-99-36-AR73.9, AC, 11 December 2002

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Brđanin and Talić, Case No. IT-99-36-T, TC II, 16 June 2003 Decision on Motion for Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98 bis, Prosecutor v. Brđanin, Case

No. IT-99-36-T, TC, ICTY, 28 November 2003 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Brđanin and Talić, Case No. IT-99-36-T, TC II, 3 December

2003 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Brđanin, Case No. IT-99-36-T, TC II, 1 September 2004

Češić (IT-95-10/1)

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Češić, Case No. IT-95-10/1-S, TC I, 11 March 2004

Delalić, Mucić, Hazim Delić, and Landžo (IT-96-21)

Decision on Motion for Provisional Release filed by the Accused Esad Landžo, Prosecutor v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. IT-96-21-T, TC, 16 January 1997

Decision on the Applications Filed by the Defence for the Accused Zeijnil Delalić and Esad Landžo on 14 February 1997 and 18 February 1997 Respectively, Prosecutor v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. IT-96-21-PT, TC II quater, 21 February 1997

Order on the Motions to Dismiss the Indictment at the Close of the Prosecutor’s Case, Prosecutor v. Delalić et al., Case IT-96-21-T, TC II quater, 18 March 1998

Decision on the Motions by the Prosecution for Protective Measures for the Prosecution Witnesses Pseudonymed “B” through to “M”, Prosecution v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. IT-96-21-T, TC II quater, 28 April 1997

Decision on the Motion of the Joint Request of the Accused Persons Regarding the Presentation of Evidence, Dated 24 May 1998, Prosecution v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. IT-96-21-T, TC II quater, 12 June 1998

lviii

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. IT-96-21-T, TC II quater, 11 July 1997

Decision on Zdravko Mucić’s Motion for the Exclusion of Evidence, Prosecution v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No.IT-96-21-T, TC II quater, 2 September 1997

Decision on Confidential Motion to Seek Leave to Call Additional Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. IT-96-21-T, TC II quater, 4 September 1997

Decision on the Motion of the Prosecution for the Admissibility of Evidence, Prosecutor v. Delalić,Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. IT-96-21-T, TC II quater, 19 January 1998

Decision on the Prosecution’s Motion for an Order Requiring Advance Disclosure of Witnesses by the Defence, Prosecutor v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. 96-21-T, TC II quater, 4 February 1998

Decision on the Motion of the Joint Request of the Accused Persons Regarding the Presentation of Evidence, Prosecutor v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. IT-96-21-T, TC I, 24 May 1998

Decision on the Motion of Joint Request of the Accused Persons Regarding the Presentation of Evidence, Prosecutor v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. 96-21-T, TC II quater, 12 June 1998

Decision on the Motion by Defendant Delalic Requesting Procedures for Final Determination of the Charges against Him, Prosecutor v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. IT-96-21, TC, 1 July 1998

Decision on the Prosecution’s Alternative Request to Reopen the Prosecution’s Case, Prosecutor v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. IT-96-21-T, TC, 19 August 1998

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. 96-21-T, TC II quater, 16 November 1998

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Delalić, Mucić, Delić, and Landžo, Case No. IT-96-21-A, AC, 20 February 2001 (with Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Hunt and Judge Bennouna)

Rasim Delić (IT-04-83)

Scheduling Order, Prosecutor v. R. Delić, Case No. IT-04-83-PT, TC I, 14 May 2007 Decision on Prosecution Motion for Suspension of the Commencement of Trial and All

Related Proceedings, Prosecutor v. R. Delić, Case No. IT-04-83-PT, TC I, 5 July 2007

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Delić, Case No. IT-04-83, TC I, 2 July 2007 Decision on Urgent Omnibus Motion for Reconsideration and Postponement of the

Commencement of Trial, Prosecutor v. R. Delić, Case No. IT-04-83-PT, TC I, 9 July 2007

Annex, Decision Adopting Guidelines on the Admission and Presentation of Evidence and Conduct of Counsel in Court, Prosecutor v. R. Delić, Case No. IT-04-83-T, TC I, 24 July 2007

Transcript (oral decision), Prosecutor v. R. Delić, Case No. IT-04-83-T, TC I, 26 February 2008

lix

Deronjić (IT-02-61)

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Deronjić, Case No. IT-02-61-S, TC II, 30 March 2004 (with Dissenting Opinion of Judge Schomburg)

Judgement on Sentencing Appeal, Prosecutor v. Deronjić, Case No. IT-02-61-A, AC, 20 July 2005

Mrkšić, Radić, and Šlivančanin (IT-95-13/1) Judgement, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić and Šlivančanin, Case No. IT-95-13/1-A, AC, 5 May

2009 (with Partially Dissenting Opinion of Judge Pocar) Mrkšić, Radić, Šljivančanin, and Dokmanović (IT-95-13a)

Order, Prosecutor v. Dokmanović, Case No. IT-95-13a-PT, TC, ICTY, 28 November

1997

Ðorđević (IT-05-87/1)

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Ðorđević, Case No. IT-05-87/1-PT, TC II, 2 November 2007 Decision on Prosecution’s Motion for Leave to Amend its Rule 65ter Witness List,

Prosecutor v. Ðorđević, Case No. IT-05-87/1-T, TC III, 14 May 2009 Decision on Prosecution’s Motion for Leave to Amend the Rule 65ter Witness List,

Prosecutor v. Ðorđević, Case No. IT-05-87/1-T, TC III, 12 March 2009

Erdemović (IT-96-22)

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Erdemović, Case No. IT-96-22-T, TC I, 29 November 1996

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Erdemović, Case No. IT-96-22-A, AC, 7 October 1997 (with Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Cassese; Joint Separate Opinion of Judge McDonald and Judge Vohrah)

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Erdemović, Case No. IT-96-22-Tbis, TC II ter, 5 March 1998

Furundžija (IT-95-17/1)

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Furundžija, Case No. IT-95-17/1, TC II, 8 June 1998 Decision, Prosecutor v. Furundžija, Case No. IT-95-17/1-T, TC II, 16 July 1998 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Furundžija, Case No. IT-95-17/1-T, TC II, 10 December 1998 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Furundžija, Case No. IT-95-17/1-A, AC, 21 July 2000

Galić (IT-98-29)

Decision on Application by Prosecution for Leave to Appeal, Prosecutor v. Galić, Case No. IT-98-29-AR73, AC, 14 December 2001

Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Concerning Rule 92bis(C), Prosecutor v. Galić, Case No. IT-98-29-A, AC, 7 June 2002

lx

Decision on Prosecution’s Application to Have Witness Barry Hogan Added to Its Witness List and His Evidence Admitted Pursuant to Rule 92 bis, Prosecutor v. Galić, Case No. IT-98-29-T, TC I Section B, 2 August 2002

Decision on the Admission into Evidence of Documents Tendered from the Bar Table by the Prosecutor, Prosecutor v. Galić, Case No. IT-98-29-T, TC I Section B, 11 September 2002

Decision on the Motion for the Entry of Acquittal of the Accused Stanislav Galić, Prosecutor v. Galić, Case No. IT-98-29-T, TC I Section B, 3 October 2002

Decision on the Defence Motion for Withdrawal of Judge Orie, Prosecutor v. Galić, Case No. IT-98-29-T, TC I, 3 February 2003

Decision on Rebuttal Evidence, Prosecutor v. Galić, Case No. IT-98-29-T, TC I, 2 April 2003

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Galić, Case No. IT-98-29-T, TC I, 5 December 2003 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Galić, Case No. IT-98-29-A, AC, 30 November 2006 (with

Separate Opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen)

Gotovina, Čermak, and Markač (IT-06-90)

Decision on Review of Indictment and Order for Non-Disclosure, Prosecutor v. Čermak and Markač, Case No. IT-03-73-I, Judge Parker, 24 February 2004

Order Pursuant to Rule 73 bis (D) to Reduce the Indictment, Prosecutor v. Gotovina, Čermak, and Markač, Case No. IT-06-90-PT, TC I, 21 February 2007

Decision on Čermak’s Defence Motion to Add a Witness to Its Rule 65 ter (G) Witness List, Prosecutor v. Gotovina, Čermak, and Markač, Case No. IT-06-90-T, TC I, 17 July 2009

Decision on Čermak Defence’s Second and Third Motions to Add a Witness to its Rule 65 ter (G) Witness List, Prosecutor v. Gotovina, Čermak, and Markač, Case No. IT-06-90-T, TC I, 22 September 2009

Decision on Čermak Defence’s Fourth Motion to Amend the Rule 65 ter (G) Witness List, Prosecutor v. Gotovina and Markač, Case No. IT-06-90-A, TC I, 15 October 2009

Decision on Prosecution’s Motion to Reopen Its Case, Prosecutor v. Gotovina, Čermak, and Markač, Case No. IT-06-90-T, TC I, 21 April 2010

Decision on Ivan Čermak and Mladen Markač Interlocutory Appeals against Trial Chamber’s Decision to Reopen the Prosecution Case, Prosecutor v. Gotovina et al., Case No. IT-06-90-AR73.6, AC, ICTY, 1 July 2010

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Gotovina and Markač, Case No. IT-06-90-A, AC, 16 November 2012

Hadžihasanović, Alagić, and Kubura (IT-01-47)

Decision on the Joint Challenge to Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. Hadžihasanović, Alagić, and Kubura, Case No. IT-01-47-A, AC, 27 November 2002

Decision on Defence Motion for Clarification on the Oral Decision of 17 December 2003 Regarding the Scope of Cross-Examination Pursuant to Rule 90 (H) of the Rules, Prosecutor v. Hadžihasanović and Kubura, Case No. IT-01-47, TC II, 28 January 2004

Decision on Motions for Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98 bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Prosecutor v. Hadžihasanović and Kubura, Case No. IT-01-47-T, TC II, 27 September 2004

lxi

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Hadžihasanović and Kubura, Case No. IT-01-47-T, TC II, 29 November 2004

Decision on Defence Motion Seeking Clarification of the Trial Chamber’s Objective in its Questions Addressed to Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Hadžihasanović and Kubura, Case No. IT-01-47-T, TC II, 4 February 2005

Decision on Prosecution’s Application to Re-Open its Case, Prosecutor v. Hadžihasanović and Kubura, Case No. IT-01-47-T, TC II, 1 June 2005

Halilović (IT-01-48)

Decision on Defence Appeal for the Pre-Trial Conference to be Postponed, Prosecutor v. Halilović, Case No. IT-01-48-PT, TC I Section A, 4 July 2003

Decision on Prosecution’s Motion to Vary its Rule 65 ter Witness List, Prosecutor v. Halilović, Case No. IT-01-48-T, TC I Section A, 7 February 2005

Decision on Prosecution’s Application for Leave to Vary Its Exhibit List Filed Pursuant to Rule 65 ter (E) (iii), Prosecutor v. Halilović, Case No. IT-01-48-T, TC I Section A, 14 February 2005

Decision on Motion for Prosecution Access to Defence Documents Used in Cross-Examination of Prosecution Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Halilović, Case No. IT-01-48-T, TC I Section A, 9 May 2005

Decision on Admission into Evidence of Prior Statement of a Witness, Prosecutor v. Halilović, Case No. IT-01-48-T, TC I Section A, 5 July 2005

Decision on Prosecution Motion to Call Rebuttal Evidence, Prosecutor v. Halilović, Case No. IT-01-48-T, TC I Section A, 21 July 2005

Decision on Defence Motion to Amend Rule 65ter Exhibit List and on Defence Motion for Admission of Defence Exhibits, Prosecutor v. Halilović, Case No. IT-01-48-T, TC I Section A, 8 August 2005

Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Concerning Admission of Record of Interview of the Accused from the Bar Table, Prosecutor v. Halilović, Case No. IT-01-48-AR73.2, AC, ICTY, 19 August 2005

Haradinaj, Balaj, and Brahimaj (IT-04-84)

Decision on Ramush Haradinaj’s Motion for Procivisional Release, Prosecutor v. Haradinaj, Balaj, and Brahimaj, Case No. IT-04-84-PT, TC II, 6 June 2005

Decision Pursuant to Rule 73 bis (D), Prosecutor v. Haradinaj, Balaj, and Brahimaj, Case No. IT-04-84-PT, TC, 22 February 2007

Trial Chamber’s Clarification on Whether the Prosecution Must Request Leave to Amend its Rule 65ter Exhibit List, Prosecutor v. Haradinaj, Balaj, and Brahimaj, Case IT-04-84-T, TC I, 25 May 2007

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Haradinaj, Balaj, and Brahimaj, Case No. IT-04-84-T, TC I, 3 April 2008

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Haradinaj, Balaj, and Brahimaj, Case No. IT-04-84-A, AC, 19 July 2010

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Haradinaj, Balaj, and Brahimaj, Case No. IT-04-84bis-T, TC II, 29 November 2012

lxii

Haraqija and Morina (IT-04-84-R77.4)

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Haraqija and Morina, Case No. IT-04-84-R77.4, TC I, 8 September 2008

Haxhiu (IT-04-84-R77.5)

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Haxhiu, Case No. IT-04-84-R77.5, TC I, 24 June 2008

Jelisić (IT-95-10)

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motions to Add a Few More Witnesses According to Rule 73 (E) Dated 17 and 24 March 1999, Prosecutor v. Jelisić, Case IT-95-10-T, TC I, 27 April 1999

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Jelisić, Case No. IT-95-10, TC I, 7 September 1999 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Jelisić, Case No. IT-95-10, TC I, 19 October 1999 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Jelisić, Case No. IT-95-10-T, TC I, 14 December 1999 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Jelisić, Case No. IT-95-10-A, AC, 5 July 2001 (with Partial

Dissenting Opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen and Partial dissenting opinion of Judge Pocar)

Miodrag Jokić (IT-01-42/1)

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. M. Jokić, Case No. IT-01-42/1-S, TC I, ICTY, 18 March 2004

Karadžić (IT-95-5/18)

Decision Rejecting the Request Submitted by Mr. Medvene and Mr. Hanley III, Defence Counsels for Radovan Karadžic, Prosecutor v. Karadžić and Prosecutor v. Mladić, Cases Nos. IT-95-5-R61 and IT-95-18-R61, TC, 15 July 1996 (see also under Mladić)

Review of the Indictments pursuant to Rule 61 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Prosecutor v. Karadžić and Prosecutor v. Mladić, Cases Nos IT-95-5-R61 and IT-95-18-R61, TC, 11 July 1996 (see also under Mladić)

Decision on Radovan Karadžić’s Request for Reversal of Denial of Contact with Journalist, Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT, Vice-President, 12 February 2009

Order Confirming a Rule 65 ter meeting and Scheduling a Status Conference, Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT, TC I, 19 March 2009

Order Arising from Rule 65 ter Meeting, Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT, TC I, 2 April 2009

Order Arising from Rule 65 ter Meeting, Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT, TC I, 22 June 2009

Order Arising from Rule 65 ter Meeting, Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT, TC I, 2 August 2009

Decision on Request for Reversal of Limitations of Contact with Journalist, Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT, Vice-President, 21 April 2009

Decision on the Accused’s Holbrooke Agreement Motion, Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT, TC III, 8 July 2009

lxiii

Decision Regarding the Accused’s Pre-Trial Brief, Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT, TC, 30 July 2009

Appendix A, Order on the Procedure for the Conduct of Trial, Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT, TC, 8 October 2009

Decision on Application of Rule 73 bis, Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. IT-9S-5/18-PT, TC, 9 October 2009

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-T, TC, 1 March 2010 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-T, TC, 16 October 2012

Milan Kovačević (IT-97-24)

Scheduling Order, Prosecutor v. M. Kovačević, Case No. IT-97-24-PT, TC, 5 March 1998

Decision Stating Reasons for Appeals Chamber’s Order of 29 May 1998, Prosecutor v. Kovačević, Case No. IT-97-24-AR73, AC, 2 July 1998 (with Separate opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen)

Kordić and Čerkez (IT-95-14/2)

Decision on the Review of the Indictment, Prosecutor v. Kordić, Blaškić, Čerkez, Šantić, Skopljak, Aleksovski, Case No. IT-95-14-I, Judge McDonald, ICTY, 10 November 1995

Order for Disclosure of Documents and Extension of Protective Measures, Prosecutor v. Kordić and Čerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2-PT, TC III, 27 November 1998

Decision on Prosecutor’s Motion on Trial Procedure, Prosecutor v. Kordić and Čerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2, TC III, 19 March 1999

Scheduling Order for Defence Case, Prosecutor v. Kordić and Čerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2, TC III, 23 February 2000

Decision on Defence Motions for Judgment of Acquittal, Prosecutor v. Kordić and Čerkez, Case IT-95-14/2-T, TC III, 6 April 2000

Annex IV, Prosecutor v. Kordić and Čerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2-T, TC III, 26 February 2001

Decision on appeal regarding the admission into evidence of seven affidavits and one formal statement, Prosecutor v. Kordić and Čerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2-AR73.6, AC, 18 September 2000

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Kordić and Čerkez, Case No. IT-94-14/2, TC, 18 October 2000 Decision Authorising Appellant’s Briefs to Exceed the Limit Imposed by the Practice

Direction on the Length of Briefs and Motions, Kordić and Čerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2-A, AC, 8 August 2001

Decision on the Application by Mario Cerkez for Extension of Time to File his Respondent’s Brief, Prosecutor v. Kordić and Čerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2-A, AC, 11 September 2002

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Kordić and Čerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2-A, AC, 17 December 2004

lxiv

Krajišnik (IT-00-39)

Decision on Prosecution Motion for Clarification in respect of Application of Rules 65 ter, 66(B) and 67(C), Prosecutor v. Krajišnik and Plavšić, Case No. IT-00-39, TC I, 1 August 2001

Decision on the Defence Application for Withdrawal of a Judge from the Trial, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 22 January 2003

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 4 February 2004 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 23 April 2004 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 26 May 2005 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 27 May 2004 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 19 August 2005 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 28 September 2005 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 5 December 2005 Decision on Cross-Examination of Milorad Davidović, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No.

IT-00-39-T, TC I, 15 December 2005 Order on Prioritizing Defence Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T,

TC I, 9 February 2006 Annex, Finalized Procedure on Chamber Witnesses; Decisions and Orders on Several

Evidentiary and Procedural Matters, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 24 April 2006

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 25 April 2006 – 22 June 2006

Finalized Procedure on Chamber Witnesses; Decisions and Orders on Several Evidentiary and Procedural Matter, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 24 April 2006

Decision on Admission of Material Sought by the Chamber and Other Exhibits, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 14 July 2006

Reasons for Decision Denying Defence Motion Regarding Chamber witnesses Biljana Plavšić and Branko Ðerić and Decision on Admission into Evidence of Biljana Plavšić’s Statement and Book Extracts, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 14 August 2006

Reasons for Decision Denying Defence Motion for Time to Call Additional Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 16 August 2006 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 30 August 2006

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 31 August 2006 Decision on Momčilo Krajišnik’s Request to Self-Represent, On Counsel’s Motions in

relation to Appointment of Amicus Curiae, and on the Prosecution Motion of 16 February 2007, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, AC, 11 May 2007 (with Fundamentally Dissenting Opinion of Judge Schomburg on the Right to Self-Representation and Separate Opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen)

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-T, TC I, 27 September 2006

Krstić (IT-98-33)

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Krstić, Case No. IT-98-33-T, TC I, 2 August 2001 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Krstić, Case No. IT-98-33-A, AC, 19 April 2004

lxv

Zoran Kupreškić, Mirjan Kupreškić, Vlado Kupreškić, Drago Josipović, Dragan Papić,

and Vladimir Šantić (IT-95-16)

Decision on the Review of the Indictment, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16-I, Judge McDonald, 10 November 1995

Scheduling Order, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16-PT, TC, 20 May 1998 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16-T, TC, 18 August 1998

Witness Summons by the Chamber Pursuant to Rule 98 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16-T, TC II, 30 September 1998

Decision on Defence Motion to Summons Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16-T, TC II, 6 October 1998

Decision on Motion for Withdrawal of the Indictment Against the Accused Vlatko Kupreškić, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case IT-95-16-T, TC II, 18 December 1998

Decision on Motion of the Accused Vlatko Kupreskic to the Trial Chamber to Order the Entry of Judgement of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98 bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Prosecutor v. Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case IT-95-16-T, TC II, 8 January 1999

Decision, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16-T, TC II, 11 January 1999

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16-T, TC, 19 July 1999

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16-T, TC, 17 August 1998

Decision on Evidence of the Good Character of the Accused and the Defence of Tu Quoque, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16, TC II, ICTY, 17 February 1999

Decision on Limitation of Scope of Cross-Examination of Character Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16, TC, 26 February 1999

Separate Opinion of Judge David Hunt on Appeal by Dragan Papic against Ruling to Proceed by Deposition, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16-A, AC, 15 July 1999

Decision on the Motion of the Accused Vlatko Kupreskic of 23 July 1999 for Judgement of Acquittal, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16-T, TC II, 28 July 1999

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16-T, TC II, 14 January 2000

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Z. Kupreškić, M. Kupreškić, V. Kupreškić, Josipović, Papić, and V. Šantić, Case No. IT-95-16, AC, 23 October 2001

lxvi

Kunarac, Kovač, and Vuković (IT-96-23 and 23/1)

Decision on Prosecution’s Motion for Exclusion of Evidence and Limitation of Testimony, Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Kovač, and Vuković, Case No. IT-96-23&23/1, TC II, 3 July 2000

Decision on Motion for Acquittal, Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Kovač, and Vuković, Case No. IT-96-23-T & IT-96-23/1-T, TC II, 3 July 2000

Decision on Rebuttal Case, Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Kovač, and Vuković, Case No. IT-96-23 & 23/1, TC II, 28 September 2000

Decisions on Defence Motions for Rejoinder, Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Kovač, and Vuković, Case No. IT-96-23 & 23/1, TC II, 31 October 2000

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Kovač, and Vuković, Case No. IT-96-23-T& IT-96-23/1-T, TC II, 22 February 2001

Kvočka, Kos, Radić, Žigić, and Prcać (IT-98-30/1)

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Kvočka, Kos, Radić, Žigić, and Prcac, Case No. IT-98-30/1, TC, ICTY, 6 March 2000

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Kvočka, Kos, Radić, Žigić, and Prcac, Case No. IT-98-30/1, TC I, ICTY, 28 August 2000

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Kvočka, Kos, Radić, Žigić, and Prcac, Case No. IT-98-30/1, TC, 26 March 2001

Decision on Exhibits, Prosecutor v. Kvočka, Kos, Radić, Žigić, and Prcac, Case No. IT-98-30/1-T, TC I, 19 July 2001

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Kvočka, Kos, Radić, Žigić, and Prcac, Case No. IT-98-30/1-T, TC, 2 November 2001

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Kvočka, Kos, Radić, Žigić, and Prcac, Case No. IT-98-30/1-A, AC, 28 February 2005

Limaj, Musliu, and Bala (IT-03-66)

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Limaj, Musliu, and Bala, Case No. IT-03-66-T, TC II, 16 November 2004

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Limaj, Musliu, and Bala, Case No. IT-03-66, TC II, 18 January 2005

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Limaj, Musliu, and Bala, Case No. IT-03-66, TC II, 1 February 2005

Decision on Prosecution’s Motion to Amend Witness List and for Protective Measures, Prosecutor v. Limaj, Musliu, and Bala, Case No. IT-03-66-T, TC II, 17 February 2005

Decision on Prosecution’s Motion II to Amend Witness List, Prosecutor v. Limaj, Musliu, and Bala, Case No. IT-03-66-T, TC II, 9 March 2005

Decision on the Prosecution’s Motions to Admit Prior Statements as Substantive Evidence, Prosecutor v. Limaj, Musliu, and Bala, Case No. IT-03-66-T, TC II, 25 April 2005

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Limaj, Musliu, and Bala, Case No. IT-03-66, TC II, 7 June 2005

Decision on Joint Defence Motion to Admit Rejoinder Statement Via Rule 92bis, Prosecutor v. Limaj, Musliu, and Bala, Case No. IT-03-66-T, TC II, 18 July 2005

lxvii

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Limaj, Musliu, and Bala, Case No. IT-03-66-T, TC II, 30 November 2005

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Limaj, Musliu, and Bala, Case IT-03-66-A, AC, 27 September 2007

M. Lukić and S. Lukić (IT-98-32/1)

Order Scheduling a Status Conference, Prosecutor v. Lukić and Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-PT, TC, 23 January 2007

Decision on Prosecution’s Response and Motion for Clarification on Defence Pre-Trial Brief, Prosecutor v. Lukić and Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-PT, TC III, 15 May 2008

Order Rescheduling Pre-Trial Conference, Prosecutor v. Lukić and Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-PT, TC III, 19 June 2008

Scheduling Order Regarding the Prosecution Opening Statement, Prosecutor v. Lukić and Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-PT, TC III, 8 July 2008

Decision on the Prosecution’s Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Order to Call Alibi Rebuttal Evidence During the Prosecution’s Case-in-Chief, Prosecutor v. Lukić and Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-AR73.1, AC, 16 October 2008

Decision on Prosecution’s Motion to Amend Prosecution’s Witness List (Dr. Fagel), Prosecutor v. Lukić and Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-T, TC III, 3 November 2008

Order Pursuant to Rule 73 ter of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Prosecutor v. Lukić and Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-T, TC III, 26 November 2008

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Lukić and Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-T, TC III, 9 December 2008

Order of Time Remaining for the Examination-in-Chief of Witnesses of the Defence of Milan Lukić, 26 January 2009

Decision on Defence Motions to Amend the Witness List (confidential), Prosecutor v. Lukić and Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-T, TC III, 3 February 2009

Decision on the Defence of Milan Lukić Request for Additional Time for Final Brief and Closing Argument…, Prosecutor v. Lukić and Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-T, TC III, 22 April 2009

Milan Lukić Final Trial Brief and Submissions, Prosecutor v. Lukić and Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-T, TC III, 13 May 2009

Martić (IT-95-11)

Decision on Prosecution’s Motion to Amend its Rule 65 ter Witness List, Prosecutor v. Martić, Case No. IT-95-11-PT, TC I, 9 December 2005

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Martić, Case No. IT-95-11-T, TC I, 13 December 2005 Decision on Prosecution’s Motion to Amend its Rule 65 ter Exhibit List, Prosecutor v.

Martić, Case No. IT-95-11-PT, TC I, 15 December 2005 Annex A, Revised Version of the Decision Adopting Guidelines on the Standards

Governing the Presentation of Evidence and the Conduct of Counsel in Court, Prosecutor v. Martić, Case No. IT-95-11-T, TC I, 19 May 2006

Decision on Defence Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Witness Milan Babić, together with Associated Exhibits, from Evidence, Prosecutor v. Martić, Case No. IT-95-11-T, TC I, 9 June 2006

lxviii

Decision on Appeal against the Trial Chamber’s Decision on the Evidence of witness Milan Babić, Prosecutor v. Martić, Case No. IT-95-11-AR73.2, AC, 14 September 2006

Decision on Defence’s Motion for Enlargement of Time for Filing the Final Trial Brief, Prosecutor v. Martić, Case No. IT-95-11-T, TC I, 23 November 2006

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Martić, Case No. IT-95-11-T, TC I, 12 June 2007

Dragomir Milošević (IT-98-29/1)

Decision on the Amendment of the Indictment and Application of Rule 73 bis (D), Prosecutor v. D. Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-PT, TC III, 12 December 2006

Scheduling Order Regarding Opening Statements and Presentation of Evidence, Prosecutor v. D. Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-PT, TC I, 13 December 2006

Decision on the Prosecution Motion to Amend its Rule 65 ter Exhibit List, Prosecutor v. D. Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-PT, TC III, 21 December 2006

Decision on Prosecution’s Second Motion for Leave to Amend Its Rule 65ter Exhibit List, Prosecutor v. D. Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-PT, TC III, 14 February 2007

Decision on Prosecution’s Motion Pursuant to Rule 73 bis (F), Prosecutor v. D. Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-T, TC III, 3 April 2007

Decision on Prosecution’s Third Motion for Leave to Amend its Rule 65 ter Exhibit List, Prosecutor v. D. Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-PT, TC III, 23 April 2007

Decision on the Prosecution’s Motion for Defence Compliance with Rule 65 ter (G), Prosecutor v. D. Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-T, TC III, 26 June 2007

Slobodan Milošević (IT-99-37, IT-01-50, and IT-01-51; IT-02-54)

Decision on Review of Indictment and Application for Consequential Orders, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, and Stojiljković, Case No. IT-99-37-I, Judge Hunt, ICTY, 24 May 1999

Decision on Application to Amend Indictment and on Confirmation of Amended Indictment, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, M. Miluntinović, N. Sainović, D. Ojdanić, and V. Slojiljković, Case No. IT-99-37-I, Judge Hunt, 29 June 2001

Decision on Preliminary Motions, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-99-37-PT, TC III, 8 November 2001

Decision on Review of Indictment, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-99-37-I, Judge May, 22 November 2001

Annex ‘Proceedings at Trial’, Order, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-99-37-PT, TC I, 11 January 2002

Decision on Prosecution Interlocutory Appeal from Refusal to Order Joinder, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case Nos IT-99-37-AR73, IT-01-50-AR73, IT-01-51-AR73, AC, 1 February 2002

Transcript, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 12 February 2002 Transcript, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 14 February 2002 Reasons for Refusal of Leave to Appeal from Decision to Impose Time Limit, Prosecutor

v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-AR73, AC, 16 May 2002 Transcript, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 31 March 2003 Reasons for Decision on the Prosecution Motion Concerning Assignment of Counsel, Prosecutor

v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54, TC III, 4 April 2003

lxix

Order Concerning the Preparation and Presentation of the Defence Case, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 17 September 2003

Decision on Interlocutory Appeal on the Admissibility of Evidence-in-Chief in the Form of Written Statements, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-AR73.4, AC, 30 September 2003

Dissenting Opinion of Judge David Hunt on Admissibility of Evidence in Chief in the Form of Written Statement, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-AR73.4, AC, 21 October 2003

Separate Opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen Appended to Appeals Chamber’s Decision Dated 30 September 2003 on Admissibility of Evidence-in-Chief in the Form of Written Statements, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-AR73.4, AC, 31 October 2003

Transcript, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 4 December 2003 Decision, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54, Registry, 11 December 2003

Decision on Prosecution’s Motion to Add Witness C-1249 to the Witness List and for Trial Related Protective Measures, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 17 December 2003

Decision, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54, Registry, 8 January 2004 Decision, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54, Registry, 6 February 2004 Order Rescheduling and Setting the Time Available to Present Defence Case, Prosecutor

v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 25 February 2004 Order to the Accused on Protective Measures for Defence Witnesses, Prosecutor v. S.

Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 27 May 2004 Decision on Motion for Judgment of Acquittal, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-

02-54, TC III, ICTY, 16 June 2004 (with Separate opinion of Judge Patrick Robinson)

Transcript, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54, TC I, 31 August 2004 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Slobodan Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54, TC I, 1 September

2004 Transcript, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 15 September 2004 Reasons for Decision on Assignment of Defence Counsel, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević,

Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 22 September 2004 Transcript, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 21 October 2004 Decision on Interlocutory Appeal of the Trial Chamber’s Decision on the Assignment of

Defence Counsel, S. Milošević v. Prosecutor, Case No. IT-02-54-AR73.7, AC, 1 November 2004

Omnibus Order on Matters Arising out of Status Conference on the Defence Case, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC, 22 April 2005

Decision on Prosecution Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Evidence of Defence Witnesses Mirat Balevic, Vladislav Jovanovic, Vukasin Andric, and Dobre Aleksovski and Decision Proprio Motu Reconsidering Admission of Exhibits 837 and 838 Regarding Evidence of Defence Witness Barry Lituchy, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 17 May 2005

Third Order on the Use of Time in the Defence Case and Decision on Prosecution’s Further Submissions on the Recording and Use of Time during the Defence Case, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 19 May 2005

Fourth Order Recording Use of Time in the Defence Case, Prosecutor v. S. Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 1 July 2005

Decision on Application for a Limited Re-Opening of the Bosnia and Kosovo Components of the Prosecution Case with Confidential Annex, Prosecutor v. S.

lxx

Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-T, TC III, 13 December 2005 (with Separate opinion of Judge O-Gon Kwon)

Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić (IT-05-87)

Decision on Application by Dragoljub Ojdanić for Disclosure of Ex Parte Submissions, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, and Ojdanić, Case No. IT-99-37-I, Duty Judge, 8 November 2002

Decision on Prosecution’s Rule 92 bis motion, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-PT, TC III, ICTY, 4 July 2006

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-T, TC III, 7 July 2006

Decision on Application of Rule 73bis, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-T, TC I, 11 July 2006

Decision Denying Prosecution’s Request for Certification of Rule 73 bis Issue for Appeal, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-T, TC III, 30 August 2006

Decision on the Use of Time, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-T, TC III, 9 October 2006

Decision on the Prosecution Motion to Admit Documentary Evidence, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-T, TC III, ICTY, 10 October 2006

Second Decision on Prosecution Motion for Leave to Amend Its Rule 65 ter Witness List to Add Wesley Clark, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-T, TC III, 16 February 2007

Decision on Prosecution Second Renewed Motion for Leave to Amend Its Rule 65 ter List to Add Michael Phillips and Shaun Byrnes, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-T, TC III, 12 March 2007

Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Against Second Decision Precluding the Prosecution from Adding General Wesley Clark to its 65ter Witness List, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-AR73.1, AC, ICTY, 20 April 2007

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-T, TC, 6 August 2007

Decision of Use of time Remaining for Defence Phase of Trial, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-T, TC I, 21 November 2007

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-T, TC I, ICTY, 9 July 2008

Order on Allocation of Time for Closing Arguments, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-T, TC III, 30 July 2008

Order Regarding Prosecution’s Submission with Respect to Rule 73 bis (D), Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-T, TC I, 7 April 2009

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Milutinović, Šainović, Ojdanić, Pavković, Lazarević, and Lukić, Case No. IT-05-87-T, TC I, 26 February 2009

lxxi

Mladić (IT-09-92 etc.)

Decision Rejecting the Request Submitted by Mr. Medvene and Mr. Hanley III, Defence Counsels for Radovan Karadžic, Prosecutor v. Karadžić and Prosecutor v. Mladić, Cases Nos. IT-95-5-R61 and IT-95-18-R61, TC, I5 July 1996 (see also under Karadžić)

Review of the Indictments pursuant to Rule 61 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Prosecutor v. Karadžić and Prosecutor v. Mladić, Cases Nos IT-95-5-R61 and IT-95-18-R61, TC, 11 July 1996 (see also under Karadžić)

Order Granting Leave to file an Amended Indictment and Confirming the Amended Indictment, Prosecutor v. Mladić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-1, Judge Orie, 8 November 2002

Mrđa (IT-02-59)

Decision on Provisional Release, Prosecutor v. Mrđa, Case No. IT-02-59-PT, TC II, 15 April 2002

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Mrđa, Case No. IT-02-59-S, TC I, 1 March 2004

Mrkšić, Radić, and Šlivančanin (IT-95-13/1)

Order for Filing of Motions and Related Matters, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Case No. IT-95-13/1-PT, TC II, 2 September 2002

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Radić, and Šlivančanin, Case No IT-95-13/1-PT, TC II, 5 March 2003

Decision on Prosecution’s Motion for Relief Pursuant to Rule 65 ter (F), Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Radić, and Šlivančanin, Case No. IT-95-13/1-PT, TC II, 10 October 2005

Decision on Prosecution Motion to Amend Its Rule 65 ter Witness List, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Radić, and Šlivančanin, Case No. IT-95-13/1-T, TC II, 28 April 2006

Decision on Prosecution Motion to Amend its Rule 65 ter List, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Radić, and Šlivančanin, Case No. IT-95-13/1-T, TC II, 6 June 2006

Decision on Motion to Reopen Prosecution Case, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Radić, and Šlivančanin, Case No. IT-95-13/1-T, TC II, 23 February 2007

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić and Šljivančanin, Case No. IT-95-13/1-A, AC, 5 May 2009 (with Partially Dissenting Opinion of Judge Pocar)

Mrkšić, Radić, Šljivančanin, and Dokmanović (IT-95-13a)

Scheduling Order, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Radić, Šljivančanin, and Dokmanović, Case No. IT-95-13a, TC II, 20 November 1997

Decision on Prosecution Motion for an Order for Publication of Newspaper Advertisement and an Order for Service of Documents, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Radić, Šljivančanin, and Dokmanović, Case No. IT-95-13a-PT, TC II, 19 December 1997

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Radić, Šljivančanin, and Dokmanović, Case No. IT-95-13a-T, TC II, 20 January 1998

Scheduling Order, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Radić, Šljivančanin, and Dokmanović, Case No. IT-95-13a, TC II, 8 June 1998

lxxii

Order for Filing of Motions and Related Matters, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Radić, Šljivančanin, and Dokmanović, Case No. IT-95-13/1-PT, TC II, 2 September 2002

Order for Filing of Motions and Related Matters, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Radić, Šljivančanin, and Dokmanović, Case No. IT-95-13/1-PT, TC II, 13 June 2003

Order for Filing of Motions and Related Matters, Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Radić, Šljivančanin, and Dokmanović, Case No. IT-95-13/1-PT, TC II, 28 November 2003

Naletilić and Martinović (IT-98-34)

Decision on Motions for Acquittal, Prosecutor v. Naletilić and Martinović, Case No. IT-98-34-T, TC I Section A, 28 February 2002

Order in Respect of Pre-Defence Filings, Prosecutor v. Naletilić and Martinović, Case No. IT-98-34-T, TC I Section A, 12 March 2002

Decision on the Admission of Exhibits Tendered through Witness ND and Damir Zorić, Prosecutor v. Naletilić and Martinović, Case No. IT-98-34-T, TC I Section A, 14 June 2002

Decision on the Admission of Exhibits Tendered through Witness Davor Marijan, Prosecutor v. Naletilić and Martinović, Case No. IT-98-34-T, TC I Section A, 3 October 2002

Decision on the Admission of Exhibits Tendered through Witness Mladen Ancić, Prosecutor v. Naletilić and Martinović, Case No. IT-98-34-T, TC I Section A, 4 October 2002

Decision on Prosecutor’s Motion Concerning Closing Arguments, Prosecutor v. Naletilić and Martinović, Case No. IT-98-34-T, TC I Section A, 23 October 2002 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Naletilić and Martinović, Case No. IT-98-34, TC I Section A, 30 October 2002

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Naletilić and Martinović, Case No. IT-98-34, AC, 3 May 2006

Dragan Nikolić (IT-94-2)

Review of Indictment pursuant to Rule 61 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Prosecutor v. D. Nikolić, Case No. IT-94-2-R61, TC, 20 October 1995

Decision on Defence Motion Challenging the Exercise of Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. D. Nikolić, Case No. IT-94-2-PT, TC II, 9 October 2002

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. D. Nikolić, Case No. IT-94-2-S, TC II, 18 December 2003

Momir Nikolić (IT-02-60/1)

Decision, Prosecutor v. Blagojević, Jokić, and M. Nikolić, Cases Nos IT-02-60-AR73, IT-02-60-AR73.2, IT-02-60-AR73.3, AC, 8 April 2003 (see also under Blagojević and Jokić)

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. M. Nikolić, Case No. IT-02-60/1-S, TC I Section A, 2 December 2003

Judgement on Sentencing Appeal, Prosecutor v. M. Nikolić, Case No. IT-02-60/1-A, AC, 8 March 2006

lxxiii

Obrenović (IT-02-60/2)

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Obrenović, Case No. IT-02-60/2-S, TC I Section A, 10 December 2003

Orić (IT-03-68)

Interlocutory Decision on Length of Defence Case, Prosecutor v. Orić, Case No. IT-03-68-AR73, AC, 20 July 2005

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Orić, Case No. IT-03-68-PT, TC III, 29 July 2003 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Orić, Case No. IT-03-38-T, TC II, 4 May 2005 Decision on First and Second Defence Filings Pursuant to Scheduling Order, Prosecutor

v. Orić, Case No. IT-03-68-T, TC II, 4 July 2005 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Orić, Case No. IT-03-38-T, TC II, 8 June 2005 Interlocutory Decision on Length of Defence Case, Prosecutor v. Orić, Case No. IT-03-

68-AR73.2, AC, 20 July 2005 Proprio Motu Order to Call a Handwriting Expert, Prosecutor v. Orić, Case No. IT-03-

68-T, TC II, 7 February 2006 Decision on Partly Confidential Defence Motion regarding the Consequences of a Party

Failing to Put its Case to Witness Pursuant to Rule 90 (H) (ii), Prosecutor v. Orić, Case No. IT-03-68-T, TC II, 17 January 2006

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Orić, Case No. IT-03-68-T, TC II, 30 June 2006

Perišić (IT-04-81)

Decision on Application of Rule 73 bis and Amendment of Indictment, Prosecutor v. Perišić, Case No. IT-04-81-PT, TC III, 15 May 2007

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Perišić, Case No. IT-04-81-T, TC I, 3 October 2008 Decision on Prosecution Motion for an advance Ruling on the Scope of Permissible

Cross-Examination, Prosecutor v. Perišić, Case No. IT-04-81-T, TC I, 12 June 2009

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Perišić, Case No. IT-04-81-A, AC, 28 February 2013 Plavšić (IT-00-39&40) Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Plavšić, Case No. IT-00-39&40/1-S, TC, 27

February 2003 Decision of the President on the Application for Pardon or Commutation of Sentence of

Mrs. Biljana Plavšić, Prosecutor v. Plavšić, Case No. IT-00-39 & 40/l-ES, President, 14 September 2009

V. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Tolimir, Miletić, Gvero, Pandurević, and Trbić

(IT-05-88)

Transcript, Prosecutor v. V. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Tolimir, Miletić, Gvero, Pandurević, and Trbić, Case No. IT-05-88-PT, TC II, 4 April 2006

Transcript, Prosecutor v. V. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Tolimir, Miletić, Gvero, Pandurević, and Trbić, Case No. IT-05-88-T, TC II, 23 August 2006

Decision on Prosecution’s Motion for Leave to Amend Rule 65 ter Witness List and Rule 65 ter Exhibit List, Prosecutor v. V. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin,

lxxiv

Tolimir, Miletić, Gvero, Pandurević, and Trbić, Case No. IT-05-88-T, TC II, 6 December 2006

Decision on Prosecution’s Third Motion for Leave to Amend Rule 65 ter Exhibit List, Prosecutor v. V. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Tolimir, Miletić, Gvero, Pandurević, and Trbić, Case No. IT-05-88-T, TC II, 10 January 2007

Transcript (oral decision), Prosecutor v. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Tolimir, Miletić, Gvero, Pandurević, and Trbić, Case No. IT-05-88-T, TC, ICTY, 17 September 2007

Decision on Appeals against Decision on Impeachment of a Party’s Own Witness, Prosecutor v. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Miletić, Gvero, and Pandurević, Case No. IT-05-88-AR73.3, AC, 1 February 2008

Order Concerning the Presentation of Evidence and the Conduct of Parties during the Defence Cases, Prosecutor v. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Miletić, Gvero, and Pandurević, Case No. IT-05-88-T, TC II, 26 May 2008

Decision on Vujadin Popović’s Interlocutory Appeal against the Decision on the Prosecution’s Motion to Reopen its Case-in-Chief, Prosecutor v. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Miletić, Gvero, and Pandurević, Case No. IT-05-88-AR73.5, AC, 24 September 2008

Redacted Version of “Decision on Motion on Behalf of Drago Nikolić Seeking Admission of Evidence Pursuant to Rule 92 quater”, Filed Confidentially on 18 December 2008, Prosecutor v. V. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Tolimir, Miletić, Gvero, Pandurević, and Trbić, Case No. IT-05-88-T, TC II, 19 February 2009

Order on Final Trial Briefs and Closing Arguments, Prosecutor v. V. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Tolimir, Miletić, Gvero, Pandurević, Case No. IT-05-88-T, TC II, 27 March 2009

Consolidated Decision on Motion on Behalf of Milan Gvero Seeking an Adjournment and Popović’s Request for an Extension of the Deadline for the Final Brief, Prosecutor v. V. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Tolimir, Miletić, Gvero, Pandurević, Case No. IT-05-88-T, TC II, 27 May 2009

Partial Decision on Gvero Motion Seeking the Recall of Certain Prosecution Witnesses and the Reopening of the Case, Prosecutor v. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Tolimir, Miletić, Gvero, Pandurević, and Trbić, Case IT-05-88-T, TC II, 15 June 2009

Decision on Motion for Additional Time for the Presentation of Closing Arguments and Guidance Concerning Rebuttal and Rejoinder Arguments, Prosecutor v. V. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Tolimir, Miletić, Gvero, Pandurević, and Trbić, Case No. IT-05-88-T, TC II, 28 August 2009

Transcript, Prosecutor v. V. Popović, Beara, Nikolić, Borovčanin, Tolimir, Miletić, Gvero, Pandurević, and Trbić, Case No. IT-05-88-T, TC, 15 September 2009

Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić (IT-04-74)

Order Directing the Prosecution to Comply with the Provision of Ordinary Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-PT, PTJ, 24 January 2004

Order on Guidelines for Drawing Up the Lists of Witnesses and Exhibits, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-PT, TC III, 30 November 2005

lxxv

Revised Version of the Decision Adopting Guidelines on Conduct of Trial Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 28 April 2006

Decision on Joint Defence Interlocutory Appeal against the Trial Chamber’s Oral Decision of 8

May 2006 Relating to Cross-Examination by Defence and on Association of Defence Counsel’s Request for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Brief, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.2, AC, 4 July 2006

Decision on the Implementation of the Decision of 8 May 2006 on Time Allocated for Cross-Examination by Defence, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 12 July 2006

Decision on Adoption of New Measures to Bring the Trial to an End within a Reasonable Time, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 13 November 2006

Decision on Adoption of New Measures to Bring the Trial to an End within a Reasonable Time, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 13 November 2006

Decision on Prosecution Appeal Concerning the Trial Chamber’s Ruling Reducing Time for the Prosecution Case, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.4, AC, 6 February 2007

Decision Following the Appeals Chamber Decision of 6 February 2007 Concerning Appeal Against Reducing Time for the Prosecution Case, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 1 March 2007

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 15 March 2007

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 19 March 2007

Order to Clarify an Oral Observation, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 15 March 2007

Decision on the Modes of Interrogating Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-PT, TC III, 10 June 2007

Decision on Praljak’s Appeal of the Trial Chamber’s 10 May 2007 Decision on the Mode of Interrogating Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.5, AC, 24 August 2007

Decision on Motion for Extension of Time for the Commencement of the Defence Case and Adopting a New Schedule, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 28 January 2008

Decision Adopting Guidelines for the Presentation of Defence Evidence, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 24 April 2008

Decision Allocating Time to the Defence to Present Its Case, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC II, 25 April 2008 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 5 May 2008

Decision Regarding Questions Asked by the Judges during the Examination of a Witness in Court, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 5 June 2008

lxxvi

Decision on Motion for Reconsideration Presented by the Praljak Defence, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 26 June 2008

Decision on Defendants Appeal against “Décision Portant Attribution du Temps à la Défense pour la Présentation des Moyens à Décharge”, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.7, AC, 1 July 2008

Decision on Prosecution Motion Concerning Use of Leading Questions…, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, ICTY, 4 July 2008

Decision on Petković’s and Praljak’s Appeals Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision Adopting Guidelines for the Presentation of Defence Evidence, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.8, AC, 18 July 2008

Decision on Slobodan Praljak's Appeal of the Trial Chamber's Decision on the Direct Examination of Witnesses Dated 26 June 2008, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.11, AC, 11 September 2008

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No.IT-04-74-T, TC III, 17 November 2008

Decision on Presentation of Documents by the Prosecution in Cross-Examination of Defence Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 27 November 2008

Decision on Scope of Cross-Examination under Rule 90 (H) of the Rules, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 27 November 2008

Dissenting Opinion of Presiding Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti Regarding the Decision on Scope of Cross-Examination under Rule 90 (H) of the Rules, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. 04-74-T, TC III, 27 November 2008

Decision Regarding Supplement to the Accused Prlić’s Rule 84 bis Statement, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 12 February 2009

Decision on the Interlocutory Appeal against the Trial Chamber’s Decision on Presentation of Documents by the Prosecution in Cross-Examination of Defence Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.14, AC, 26 February 2009

Decision on Jadranko Prlić’s Interlocutory Appeal against the Decision Regarding Supplement to the Accused Prlić’s Rule 84 bis Supplement, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.15, AC, 20 April 2009

Decision on Praljak Defence Notice Concerning Opening Statements under Rules 84 and 84 bis, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 27 April 2009

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-T, TC III, 4 May 2009

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić, Case IT-04-74-T, TC III, 1 March 2011

lxxvii

Rajić (IT-95-12)

Review of the Indictment, Prosecutor v. Rajić, Case No. IT-95-12-I, Judge Sidhwa, 29 August 1995

Review of the Indictment Pursuant to Rule 61 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Prosecutor v. Rajić, Case No. IT-95-12-R61, TC, 13 September 1996

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Rajić, Case No. IT-95-12-S, TC I, 8 May 2006

Šešelj (IT-03-67)

Decision on Motion for Disqualification, Prosecutor v. Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-PT, Bureau, 10 June 2003

Decision, Prosecutor v. Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-PT, Registry, 11 December 2003 Decision, Prosecutor v. Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-PT, Registry, 9 March 2004 Decision, Prosecutor v. Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-PT, Registry, 8 April 2004 Decision, Prosecutor v. Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-PT, Registry, 7 May 2004 Decision on Motions for Disqualification of Judge Patrick Robinson, Judge Alphons

Orie, and Judge Bakone Justice Moloto, Prosecutor v. Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-PT, Bureau, 6 November 2006

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67, TC I, 8 November 2006 Decision on the Application of Rule 73 bis, Prosecutor v. Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-PT, TC I, 8 November 2006

Reasons for Decision on the Accused’s Request to File a Pre-Trial Brief, Prosecutor v. Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-PT, TC I, 22 November 2006

Decision on Appeal against the Trial Chamber’s Decision (No. 2) on Assignment of Counsel, Prosecutor v. Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-AR73.4, AC, 8 December 2006

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-PT, TC I, 23 October 2007 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67, TC I, 8 November 2007

Sikirica, Došen, and Kolundžija (IT-95-8)

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Sikirica, Došen, and Kolundžija, Case No. IT-95-8, TC, 24 April 2001

Judgement on Defence Motions to Acquit, Prosecutor v. Sikirica, Došen, and Kolundžija, Case No. IT-95-8-T, TC, 3 September 2001

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Sikirica, Došen, and Kolundžija, Case No. IT-95-8-S, TC, 13 November 2001

B. Simić, M. Simić, M. Tadić, Todorović, and Zarić (IT-95-9)

Decision on the Prosecution Motion under Rule 73 for a Ruling Concerning the Testimony of a Witness, Prosecutor v. B. Simić, M. Simić, M. Tadić, Todorović, and Zarić, Case No. IT-95-9-PT, TC III, 27 July 1999 (with Separate Opinion of Judge David Hunt on Prosecutor’s Motion for a Ruling Concerning the Testimony of a Witness)

Transcript, Prosecutor v. B. Simić, M. Simić, M. Tadić, Todorović, and Zarić Case No. IT-95-9-T, TC II, 4 June 2002

Written Reasons for Decision on Motions for Acquittal, Prosecutor v. Simić, M. Tadić, and Zarić, Case No. IT-95-9-T, TC II, 11 October 2002

lxxviii

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. M. Simić, Case No. IT-95-9/2-S, TC II, 17 October 2002

Transcript, Prosecutor v. B. Simić, M. Simić, M. Tadić, Todorović, and Zarić Case No. IT-95-9-T, TC II, 13 March 2003

Stakić (IT-97-24)

Order for Filing of Motions and Related Matters, Prosecutor v. Stakić, Case No. IT-97-24-PT, TC II, 7 March 2002

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Stakić, Case IT-97-24-PT, TC II, 10 April 2002 Decision on Defence Motion for the Judgement of Acquittal, Prosecutor v. Stakić, Case

No. IT-97-24-T, TC II, 31 October 2002 Order Summoning Dr. Biljana Plavšić, Proprio Motu, to Appear as a Witness of the Trial

Chamber Pursuant to Rule 98, Prosecutor v. Stakić, Case No. IT-97-24-T, TC II, 9 January 2003

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Stakić, Case No. IT-97-24, TC II, 28 March 2003 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Stakić, Case No. IT-97-24-T, TC II, 31 July 2003 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Stakić, Case No. IT-97-24-A, AC, 22 March 2006

Stanišić and Simatović (IT-03-69)

Decision pursuant to Rule 73 bis(D), Prosecutor v. Stanišić and Simatović, Case No. IT-03-69-PT, TC III, 4 February 2008

Scheduling Order for Status Conference, Prosecutor v. Stanišić and Simatović, Case No. IT-03-69-PT, TC III, 6 November 2008

Decision on Future Course of Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Stanišić and Simatović, Case No. IT-03-69-PT, TC III, 9 April 2008

Annex A, Order on Guidelines on the Admission and Presentation of Evidence, Prosecutor v. Stanišić and Župljanin, Case No. IT-08-91-PT, TC II, 10 September 2009

Stanišić and Župljanin (IT-08-91)

Scheduling Order for a Status Conference and Order Recalling the Accused from Provisional Release, Prosecutor v. Stanišić and Župljanin, Case No. IT-08-91-PT, TC III, 26 May 2009

Order to the Defence to Supplement the Pre-Trial Brief Pursuant to Rule 65 ter (F), Prosecutor v. Stanišić and Župljanin, Case No. IT-08-91-PT, TC III, 9 July 2009

Decision Denying the Prosecution Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Limiting the Number of Witnesses It May Call at Trial, Prosecutor v. Stanišić and Župljanin, Case No. IT-08-91-T, TC II, 21 October 2009

Decision on Prosecution’s Motion Seeking Clarification in Relation to the Application of Rule 90(H)(ii), Prosecutor v. Stanišić and Župljanin, Case No. IT-08-91-T, TC II, 12 May 2010

lxxix

Strugar (IT-01-42)

Decision on: the Defence Motion to Suspend All Time Limits & Protect the Basic Rights of the Accused; and the Defence Motion for an Extension of Time, Prosecutor v. Strugar, Case No. IT-01-42-PT, TC I, 18 September 2003

Scheduling Order for the Pre-Trial Conference and the Commencement of the Trial against Pavle Strugar…, Prosecutor v. Strugar, Case No. IT-01-42-PT, TC I, 15 December 2003

Decision on Defence Motion Requesting Judgement of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98 bis, Prosecutor v. Strugar, Case No. IT-01-42, TC II, 21 June 2004

Decision II on the Admissibility of Certain Documents, Prosecutor v. Strugar, Case No. IT-01-42-T, TC II, 9 September 2004

Tadić (IT-94-1)

Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion Requesting Protective Measures for Victims and Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC II, 10 August 1995 (with Separate opinion of Judge Stephen)

Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-AR72, AC, 2 October 1995

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC II, 7 May 1996 Decision on the Prosecution Motion to Compel Disclosure of Statements Taken by the

Defence of Witnesses Who Will Testify, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC II, 7 May 1996

Decision on Defence Motion to Dismiss Charges, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC II, 13 September 1996

Decision on the Defence Motion on Hearsay, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC II, 5 August 1996

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC II, 25-29 October 1996 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC II, 27 November 1996 Transcript, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC II, 28 November 1996 Decision on Prosecution Motion for Production of Defence Witness Statements,

Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC II, 27 November 1996 (with Separate Opinion of Judge Stephen on Prosecution Motion for Production of Defence

Witness Statements and Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge McDonald on Prosecution Motion for Production of Defence Witness Statements)

Decision on Prosecution Motion for Production of Defence Witness Statements, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC, 27 November 1996 (with Separate Opinion of Judge Stephen on Prosecution Motion for Production of Defence Witness Statements; Separate Opinion of Judge Vohrah on Prosecution Motion for Production of Defence Witness Statements; Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge McDonald)

Scheduling Order, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC II, 27 May 1997 Scheduling Order, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC II, 12 June 1997 Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC II, 14 July 1997 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-A, AC, 15 July 1999 Order Remitting Sentencing to a Trial Chamber, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1,

AC, 10 September 1999

lxxx

Judgement on Allegations of Contempt Against Prior Counsel, Milan Vujin, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-A-R77, AC, 31 January 2000

Opinion and Judgement, Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-T, TC II, 7 May 1997

Todorović (IT-95-9/1)

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Todorović, Case No. IT-95-9/1-S, TC, 31 July 2001

Tolimir (IT-04-80)

Decision on Radivoje Miletić’s Interlocutory Appeal, Prosecutor v. Tolimir, Miletić, and Gvero, Case No. IT-04-80-AR73.1, AC, 27 January 2006

Vasiljević (IT-98-32)

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Vasiljević, Case No. IT-98-32-A, AC, 25 February 2004

Zelenović (IT-96-23/2)

Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Zelenović, Case No. IT-96-23/2-S, TC I, 4 April 2007

International Military Tribunal (IMT)

‘Report to the President by Mr. Justice Jackson’, 6 June 1945, in Report of Robert H. Jackson, US Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials, London 1945 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1949)

‘Tenth Day, Saturday, 1 December 1945’, in Trials of Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. III (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947)

‘Twelfth Day, Tuesday, 9 December 1945’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. III (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947)

‘Twenty-First Day, Monday, 17 December 1945’, in The Trial of Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. IV (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947)

‘Twenty-Sixth Day, Thursday, 3 January 1946’, in The Trial of Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. IV (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947)

‘Forty-Fifth Day, Tuesday, 29 January 1946’, in The Trial of Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. VI (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947)

‘Sixty-Sixth Day, Saturday, 23 February 1946’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945 – 1 October 1946, vol. 8, (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947)

Order on Dr. Stahmer’s memorandum of 4 February 1946 and the Prosecution’s motion of the 11th of February 1946, ‘Sixty-Sixth Day, Saturday, 23 February 1946’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. VIII (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947)

lxxxi

‘Sixty-Eighth Day, Tuesday, 26 February 1946’, in Trials of Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. VIII (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947)

‘One Hundred and Third Day, Tuesday, 9 April 1946’, in The Trial of Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. XI (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947)

‘One Hundred and Thirty-Sixth Day, Wednesday, 22 May 1946’ in The Trial of Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. XIV (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1948)

‘One Hundred and Fifty-Fourth Day, Thursday, 13 June 1946’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. XVI (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1948)

‘One Hundred and Sixty-Third Day, Tuesday, 25 June 1946’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. XVIII (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1948)

‘One Hundred and Seventy-First Day, Thursday, 4 July 1946’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. XVIII (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1948)

‘One Hundred and Seventy-Second Day, Friday, 5 July 1946’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. XVII (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1948)

‘One Hundred and Eighty-Fourth Day, Tuesday, 23 July 1946’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. XIX (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1948)

‘One Hundred and Eighty-Sixth Day, Thursday, 25 July 1946’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. XIX (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1948)

Summation for the Prosecution by Justice Robert Jackson, 26 July 1946, reprinted as: R.H. Jackson, ‘Closing Arguments for Conviction of Nazi War Criminals’, (1946-7) 20 Temple Law Quarterly 85

‘One Hundred and Eighty-Eighth Day, Saturday, 27 July 1946’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. XIX (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1948)

‘One Hundred and Eighty-Ninth Day, Monday, 29 July 1946’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. XIX (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1948)

‘One Hundred and Ninetieth Day, Tuesday, 30 July 1946’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. XX (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1948)

‘Two Hundred and Sixteenth Day, Saturday, 31 August 1946’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. XXII (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1948)

‘Judgment, 1 October 1946’, in Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. I (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947)

International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE)

Judgment, 4-12 November 1948, reprinted in B.V.A. Röling and C.F. Rüter (eds), The Tokyo Judgement: the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (I.M.T.F.E), 29

lxxxii

April 1946-12 November 1948, Vol. I (Amsterdam: APA-University Press Amsterdam, 1977)

Nuremberg Military Tribunals (Control Council No. 10)

‘Opening Statement of the Prosecution by Brigadier General Telford Taylor, 9 December 1946’, in Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council No. 10, Volume 1: “The Medical Case” (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1949)

Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)

Alex Tamba Brima, Brima Bazzy Kamara, and Santigie Borbor Kanu (AFRC, SCSL-04-

16 etc.)

Order for Filing Pre-Trial Briefs (Under Rules 54 and 73 bis), Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, and Kanu, Case No. SCSL-04-16-PT, TC, 13 February 2004

Decision on Constitutionality and Lack of Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. Kallon, Prosecutor v. Norman, and Prosecutor v. Kamara, Cases Nos. SCSL-2004-15-AR72(E), SCSL-2004-14-AR72(E), SCSL-2004-15-AR72(E), AC, SCSL, 13 March 2004

Decision on Prosecution Request for Leave to Amend the Indictment, Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, and Kanu, Case No. SCSL-04-16-PT, TC, 6 May 2004

Decision on the Confidential Joint Defence Motion to Declare Null and Void Testimony-in-Chief of Witness TF1-023, Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, and Kanu, Case No. SCSL-04-16-T, TC II, 25 May 2005

Decision on Prosecution Request for Leave to Call an Additional Witness (Zainab Hawa Bangura)…, Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, and Kanu, Case No. SCSL-04-16-T, TC II, 5 August 2005

Decision on Prosecution Request for Leave to Call an Additional Witness Pursuant to Rule 73 bis(E), Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, and Kanu, Case No. SCSL-04-16-T, TC II, 5 August 2005

Decision on Joint Defence Motion for Leave to Recall Witness TF1-023, Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, and Kanu, Case No. SCSL-04-16-T, TC II, 25 October 2005

Decision on Brima-Kamara Defence Appeal Motion Against Trial Chamber II Majority Decision on Extremely Urgent Confidential Joint Motion for the Re-Appointment of Kevin Metzger and Wilbert Harris as Lead Counsel for Alex Tamba Brima and Brima Bazzy Kamara, Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, and Kanu, Case No. SCSL-2004-16-AR73, AC, 8 December 2005 (with Separate and Concurring Opinion of Justice Robertson)

Decision on Defence Motions for Judgement of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98, Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, and Kanu, Case No. SCSL-04-16-T, TC II, 31 March 2006

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, and Kanu, Case No. SCSL-2004-16-T, TC II, 31 March 2006

Order for Disclosure Pursuant to Rule 73ter and the Start of the Defence Case, Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, and Kanu, Case No. SCSL-04-16-T, TC II, 26 April 2006

lxxxiii

Decision on Confidential Prosecution Motion to Reopen the Prosecution Case to Present an Additional Prosecution Witness, Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, and Kanu, Case No. SCSL-04-16-T, TC II, 28 September 2006

Order for Filing of Final Trial Briefs and Presentation of Closing Arguments, Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, and Kanu, Case No. SCSL-04-16-T, TC II, 30 October 2006

Decision on Confidential Motion to Call Evidence in Rebuttal, Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, and Kanu, Case No. SCSL-04-16-T, TC II, 14 November 2006

Sam Hinga Norman, Moinina Fofana, and Allieu Kondewa (CDF, SCSL-04-14, etc.)

Decision on the Applications for a Stay of Proceedings and Denial of Right to Appeal, Prosecutor v. Norman, Prosecutor v. Kallon, Prosecutor v. Gbao, Cases Nos SCSL-03-08-PT, SCSL-03-07-PT, SCSL-03-09-PT, AC, 4 November 2003 (see also under RUF)

Decision on Appeal by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission for Sierra Leone and Chief Sam Hinga Norman against the Decision of His Lordship, Mr Justice Bankole Thompson Delivered on 30 October 2003 to Deny the TRC’s Request to Hold a Public Hearing with Chief Sam Hinga Norman JP, Prosecutor v. Norman, Case No. SCSL-04-8, President, 28 November 2003

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-PT, TC I, 4 March 2004

Decision on Constitutionality and Lack of Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. Kallon, Prosecutor v. Norman, and Prosecutor v. Kamara, Cases Nos. SCSL-2004-15-AR72(E), SCSL-2004-14-AR72(E), SCSL-2004-15-AR72(E), AC, 13 March 2004

Decision on Prosecution Request for Leave to Call Additional Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-T, TC I, 29 July 2004 Decision on Prosecution Request for Leave to Call Additional Expert Witness Dr. William Haglund, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No SCSL-04-14-T, TC I, 1 October 2004

Decision on Amendment of the Consolidated Indictment, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-044-14-AR73, AC, 16 May 2005

Decision on Prosecution Request for Leave to Call Additional Witnesses and for Orders for Protective Measures, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-T, TC I, 21 June 2005

Order Concerning the Preparation and Presentation of the Defence Case, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-T, TC I, 21 October 2005

Decision on Motions for Judgment of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14, TC I, 21 October 2005

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-T, TC I, 19 January 2006

Decision on Prosecution’s Request for Order to Defence Pursuant to Rule 73 ter (B) to Disclose Written Witness Statements, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No SCSL-04-14-T, TC I, 21 February 2006

Decision on the First Accused’s Urgent Motion for Leave to File Additional Witness and Exhibit Lists, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-T, TC I, 6 April 2006

Decision on the Third and Second Accused’s Request for Leave to Raise Evidentiary Objections, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-T, TC I, 8 June 2006

lxxxiv

Decision on Fofana Application for Leave to Call Additional Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-T, TC I, 17 July 2006

Decision on Interlocutory Appeals Against Trial Chamber Decision Refusing to Subpoena the President of Sierra Leone, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-A, AC, 11 September 2006

Decision on the Impermissibility of Eliciting Evidence Involving the Second Accused through Cross-Examination of Witness Called by the Third Accused, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-T, TC I, 10 November 2006

Order for Filing Final Trial Briefs and Presenting Closing Arguments, Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana, and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-T, TC I, 29 September 2006 Judgement, Prosecutor v. Fofana and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-T, TC I, 2 August 2007 (with Separate Concurring and Partially Dissenting Opinion of Hon. Justice Bankole Thompson Filed Pursuant to Article 18 of the Statute)

Judgement on the Sentencing of Moinina Fofana and Allieu Kondewa, Prosecutor v. Fofana and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-T, TC I, 9 October 2007

Judgment, Prosecutor v. Fofana and Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-A, AC, 28 May 2008 (with Partially Dissenting Opinion of Honourable Justice George Gelaga King)

Charles Ghankay Taylor (SCSL-03-1)

Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-2003-01- 1, AC, 31 May 2004

Scheduling order for a pre-trial conference pursuant to Rule 73 bis, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-1-PT, TC II, 2 February 2007

Decision on Urgent Defence Motion to Vacate Date for Filing of Defence Pre-Trial Brief, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-1-PT, TC II, 5 March 2007

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-1-PT, TC II, 7 May 2007 Decision on Urgent and Public Defence Motion Requesting Leave For Charles Ghankay

Taylor to Give An Un-sworn Statement from the Dock, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-1-PT, TC II, 29 May 2007

Decision on Defence Application for Leave to Appeal the 29 May 2007 ‘Decision On Urgent And Public Defence Motion Requesting Leave For Charles Ghankay Taylor to Give an Un-Sworn Statement from the Dock’, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-1-T, TC II, 16 July 2007

Decision on Defence Motion for Leave to Vary Version III of the Defence Rule 73ter Witness List and Summaries, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-1-T, TC II, 22 January 2009

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-2003-01-T, TC II, SCSL, 4 May 2009 Decision on Public with Confidential Annexes A and B Prosecution Motion to Call Three

Additional Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-1-T, TC II, 29 June 2010

Decision on Prosecution Motion in Relation to the Applicable Legal Standards Governing the Use and Admission of Documents by the Prosecution During Cross-Examination, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-1-T, TC II, 30 November 2009

Order Setting a Date for the Closure of the Defence Case and Dates for Filing of Final Trial Briefs and the Presentation of Closing Arguments, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-1-T, TC II, 22 October 2010

lxxxv

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-01-T, TC II, 18 May 2012 Sentencing Judgement, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-01-T, TC II, 30 May

2012 Judgment, Prosecutor v. Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-01-A, AC, 26 September 2013

Issa Sesay, Morris Kallon, and Augustine Gbao (RUF, SCSL-04-15)

Decision on the Request by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Sierra Leone to Conduct a Public Hearing with Augustine Gbao, Prosecutor v. Gbao, Case No. SCSL-04-9, Judge Thompson, 3 November 2003

Decision on the Applications for a Stay of Proceedings and Denial of Right to Appeal, Prosecutor v. Norman, Prosecutor v. Kallon, Prosecutor v. Gbao, Cases Nos SCSL-2003-08-PT, SCSL-2003-07-PT, SCSL-2003-09-PT, AC, SCSL, 4 November 2003 (see also under CDF)

Order for Filing Pre-Trial Briefs (Under Rules 54 and 73 bis), Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao, Case No. SCSL-04-15-PT, TC, 13 February 2004

Reasons for Order for Closed Session of the Status Conference and Modification of Said Order in Part, Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao, Case SCSL-04-15-PT, TC I, 5 March 2004

Decision on Constitutionality and Lack of Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. Kallon, Prosecutor v. Norman, and Prosecutor v. Kamara, Cases Nos. SCSL-2004-15-AR72(E), SCSL-2004-14-AR72(E), SCSL-2004-15-AR72(E), AC, SCSL, 13 March 2004

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao, Case No. SCSL-04-15-T, TC I, 5 July 2004


Gbao – Decision on Application to Withdraw Counsel, Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao, Case No. SCSL-04-15-T, TC I, 6 July 2004

Decision on Prosecution Request to Call Additional Witnesses, Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao, Case No. SCSL-2004-15-T, TC I, 29 July 2004

Decision on Prosecution Request for Leave to Call Additional Witnesses and Disclose Additional Witness Statements, Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao, Case No. SCSL-04-15-T, TC I, 11 February 2005

Decision Regarding the Prosecution’s Further Renewed Witness List, Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao, Case No. SCSL-04-15-T, TC I, 5 April 2005


Transcript, Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao, Case No. SCSL-04-15-T, TC I, 25 October 2006

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao, Case No. SCSL-04-15-T, TC I, 20 March 2007

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao, Case No. SCSL-04-15-T, TC I, 2 May 2007

Transcript, Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao, Case No. SCSL-04-15-T, TC I, 3 May 2007

Written Reasons for the Decision on Request for the Gbao Opening Statement to Be Given at the Beginning of the Presentation of Evidence for the Third Accused, Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao, Case No. SCSL-04-15-T, TC I, 3 July 2007

lxxxvi

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Sesay, Kallon, and Gbao, Case No. SCSL-04-15-T, TC I, 2 March 2009

Margaret Fomba Brima, Neneh Binta Bah Jalloh, and Esther Kamara (SCSL-2005-02)

and Anifa Kamara (SCSL-2005-03) (contempt)

Sentencing Judgment in Contempt Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Brima, Jalloh, and Kamara and Prosecutor v. Kamara, Cases Nos SCSL-2005-02 & SCSL-2005-03, TC I, 21 September 2005

Hassan Papa Bangura, Samuel Karbo, Santigie Borbor Kanu and Brima Bazzy

Kamara (SCSL-2011-02) Judgement in Contempt Proceedings, Prosecutor v. Bangura, Karbo, Kanu and Kamara,

Case No. SCSL-2011-02-T, TC II, 25 September 2012

Special Panels for Serious Crimes (East Timor)

Domingos Amati and Francisco Matos

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Domingos Amati and Francisco Matos, Case No. 12/2003, SPSC, Dili District Court, East Timor, 4 March 2005

Agustinho Atolan

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Agustinho Atolan, Case No. 3/2003, Dili District Court, 9 June 2003

Manuel Leto Bere

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Manuel Leto Bere, Case No. 10/2000, Dili District Court, 15 May 2001

Jose Cardoso Ferreira

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Jose Cardoso Ferreira, Case No. 04c/2001, Dili District Court, 5 April 2003

Umbertus Ena and Carlos Ena

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Umbertus Ena and Carlos Ena, Case No. 5/2002, SPSC, 23 March 2004

Lino de Carvalho

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Lino de Carvalho, Case No. 10/2001, Dili District Court, 18 May 2004

Final Decision, Prosecutor v. Lino de Carvalho, Recurso Crime No. 2001/04, 29 October 2001

lxxxvii

Agostinho Cloe et al.

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Agostinho Cloe et al., Case No. 4/2003, Dili District Court, 16 November 2004

Agustinho da Costa

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Agustinho da Costa, Case No. 07/2000, Dili District Court, 11 October 2001

Damião da Costa Nunes

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Damião da Costa Nunes, Case No. 1/2003, Dili District Court, 10 December 2003

João Fernandes

Judgement, Prosecutor v. João Fernandes, Case No. 1/00.CG.2000, Dili District Court, 25 January 2001 (with Judgement of Egonda-Ntende, J.A.)

Judgement, Prosecutor v. João Fernandes, Case No. 2001/02, Court of Appeal, 29 June 2001

Julio Fernandes

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Julio Fernandes, Case No. 02 C.G.2000, Dili District Court, 27 February 2001

João Franca da Silva (Lolotoe)

Judgement, Prosecutor v. João Franca da Silva, Case No. 4a/2001, Dili District Court, 5 December 2002

Sabino Gouveia Leite

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Sabino Gouveia Leite, Case No. 4b/2001, Dili District Court, 7 December 2002

Gaspar Leite

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Gaspar Leite, Case No. 05/2001, Dili District Court, 14 September 2002

Abilio Mendes Correia

Decision on the Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Prosecutor’s 27 January 2004 “Transfer of Material” from Court File, Prosecutor v. Abilio Mendes Correia, Case No. 19/2001, Dili District Court, 1 March 2004

lxxxviii

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Abilio Mendes Correia, Case No. 19/2001, Dili District Court, 9 March 2004

Gaspar Leki

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Gaspar Leki, Case No. 05/2001, District Dili Court, 14 September 2002

Joseph Leki

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Joseph Leki, Case No. 05/2000, District Dili Court, 11 June 2001

Anastacio Martins and Domingos Gonçalves

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Anastacio Martins and Domingos Gonçalves, Case No. 11/2001, Dili District Court, 13 July 2003

Joni Marques et al. (Los Palos)

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Joni Marques et al., Case No. 09/2000, District Dili Court, 11 December 2001

Miguel Mau

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Miguel Mau, Case No. 08/C.G/2003/TD.DIL, District Dili Court, 23 February 2004

Benjamin Sarmento and Romeiro Tilman

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Benjamin Sarmento and Romeiro Tilman, Case No. 18/2001, Dili District Court, 16 July 2003

Augusto dos Santos

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Augusto dos Santos, Case No. 06/2001, District Dili Court, 14 May 2002

João Sarmento

Judgement, Prosecutor v. João Sarmento, Case No. 18A/2001, Dili District Court, 12 August 2003

Carlos Soares

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Carlos Soares, Case No. 12/2000, Dili District Court, 31 May 2001

lxxxix

Fransisco Soares

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Fransisco Soares, Case No. 14/2001, Dili District Court, 12 September 2002

Carlos Soares Carmona

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Carlos Soares Carmona, Case No. 03 C.G. 2000, Dili District Court, 19 April 2001

Florencio Tacaqui Judgement, Prosecutor v. Florencio Tacaqui, Case No. 20/2001, SPSC, Dili District

Court, 9 December 2004

Jose Valente

Judgement, Prosecutor v. Jose Valente, Case No. 03/2001, Dili District Court, 19 June 2001

X

Judgement, Prosecutor v. ‘X’, Case No.04/2002, Dili District Court, 2 December 2002

Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL)

Order Directing the Lebanese Judicial Authority Seized with the Case of the Attack

against Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri and Others to Defer to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, Case CH/PTJ/2009/01, PTJ, 27 March 2009

Order Regarding the Detention of Persons Detained in Lebanon in Connection with the Case of the Attack against Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri and Others, Case No. CH/PTJ/2009/06, PTJ, 29 April 2009

Interlocutory Decision on the Applicable Law: Terrorism, Conspiracy, Homicide, Perpetration, Cumulative Charging, STL-11-01/I, AC, 16 February 2011

Order Directing the Lebanese Judicial Authority Seized with the Case Concerning the Attack Perpetrated against Mr Elias El-Murr on 12 July 2005 to Defer to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, Case No. STL-11-02/D/PTJ, PTJ, 19 August 2011

Order Directing the Lebanese Judicial Authority seized with the Case Concerning the Attack Perpetrated against Mr George Hawi on 21 June 2005 to Defer to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, Case No. STL-11-02/D/PTJ, PTJ, 19 August 2011

Order Directing the Lebanese Judicial Authority Seized with the Case Concerning the Attack Perpetrated against Mr Marwan Hamadeh On 1 October 2004 to Defer to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, Case No. STL-11-02/D/PTJ, PTJ, 19 August 2011

Ayyash, Badreddine, Oneissi, and Sabra (STL-11-01)

xc

Interlocutory Decision on the Applicable Law: Terrorism, Conspiracy, Homicide, Perpetration, Cumulative Charging, Prosecutor v. Ayyash, Baddreddine, Oneissi, and Sabra, Case STL-11-01, AC, 16 February 2011

Decision relating to the Examination of the Indictment of 10 June 2011 Issued against Mr Salim Jamil Ayyash, Mr Mustafa Amine Badreddine, Mr Hussein Hassan Oneissi & Mr Assad Hassan Sabra, Prosecutor v. Ayyash, Badreddine, Oneissi, and Sabra, Case No. STL-11-01/I/PTJ, PTJ, 28 June 2011

Decision to Hold Trial in Absentia, Prosecutor v. Ayyash, Badreddine, Oneissi, and Sabra, Case No. STL-11-01/I/TC, TC, 1 February 2012

Decision on the Prosecution Submission Pursuant to Rule 91(G)(ii) and (iii), Prosecutor v. Ayyash, Baddreddine, Oneissi, and Sabra, Case No. STL-11-01/PT/PTJ, PTJ, 18 September 2013

Decision Authorising the Prosecution to Amend its Exhibit List and to Redact Exhibit 55, Prosecutor v. Ayyash, Baddreddine, Oneissi, and Sabra, Case No. STL-11-01/PT/TC, TC, 19 November 2013

In the Matter El Sayed

Order assigning Matter to Pre-Trial Judge, In the matter of El Sayed, Case No. CH/PRES/2010/01, President, STL, 15 April 2010

Decision on Partial Appeal by Mr. El Sayed of Pre-Trial Judge's Decision of 12 May 2011, In the matter El Sayed, Case No. CH/AC/2011/01, AC, 19 July 2011

National Courts

Australia

Doney v. R. [1990] HCA 51; (1990) 171 CLR 207, 27 November 1990 (High Court of Australia)

Canada

Monteleone v. the Queen [1987] 2 S.C.R. 154 (Supreme Court) R. v. T. (R.) (1992), 10 O.R. (3d) 514 (Ontario Court of Appeal)

Germany

Bundesgerichtshof in Strafsachen, BGHSt 14 [1960] 358 Schwurgericht (Jury Court), Frankfurt am Mein, 50/4 Ks 2/63, 1963 Bundesgerichtshof, 28 August 1997, (1997) 43 Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichthofes

in Strafsachen 195 Bundesgerichtshof, 26 November 2003, (2004) 24 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 164

England and Wales

R. v. White (1811) 3 Camp. 98 Parkin v. Moon [1836] 7 C. & P. 409 R. v. Boucher (1837) 8 C. & P. 14 Prince v. Samo (1838) 7 Ad. & E. 627

xci

Frost [1839] 9 C. & P. 129, 159 Pearse v. Pearse (1846) 1 De G & Sm 12, 28-29, 63 ER 950 R. v. Taylor (1859) 1 F. & F. 511 Browne v. Dunn [1893] 6 R. 67, H.L R. v. Wainright (1895) 13 Cox 171 Kendall v Hamilton (1879) 4 App Cas (House of Lords) R. v. Pope (1901) 18 T.L.R. 717 In the Matter of an Arbitration between Coles and Ravenshear, [1907] 1 KB 1 R. v. Sussex Justices, Ex party McCarthy (Lord Hewart CJ) (1923) 1 King’s Bench 256 Mechanical and General Inventions Co. Ltd. v. Austin [1935] A.C. 346, 360 Treacey [1944] 2 All E.R. 229 Yuil v. Yuil [1945] 1 All ER 183 (Court of Appeal) R. v. Rice, 1 Q.B. 857 [1963] Simonds [1969] 1 Q.B. 685 R. v. Turner (1970) 2 Q.B. 321, 54 Cr. App. R. 352 (Court of Appeal) Kalia [1974] 60 Cr.App. R 200 R. v. Barker [1977] 65 Cr. App. R. 287 Callaghan [1979] 69 Cr. App. R. 88 Maynard [1979] 69 Cr. App. R. 309 R. v. Galbraith [1981] 1 WLR 1039 at 1042, 73 Cr. App. R. 124 (Court of Appeal) Scott [1984] 79 Cr. App. R 49 R. v. Hutchinson (1985), 82 Cr. App. R. 51 at 29, CA Francis [1990] 91 Cr. App. R. 271

Israel

The Attorney-General of the Government of Israel v. Adolf Eichmann, Criminal Case No. 40/61, District Court of Jerusalem, Israel, 12 December 1961 (Supreme Court 1962).

Italy

Decision No. 26/2007, Constitutional Court, 24 January 2007

United States

Alford v. US, 282 US 687, 694 (1931) Berger v. US, 295 U.S. 78 (1935) Viereck v. US, 318 US 236, 246 (1943) Curley v. United States, 160 F.2d 229, 232-3 (DC. Cir. 1947) Griffin v. California, 380 US 609, 614 (1965) Tehan v. United States ex rel. Shott, 382 US 406, 416 (1966) Williams v. Florida, 399 US 78, 82 (1970) State v. Marmon, 154 N.W.2d 55, 62 (N.D. 1967) Brady v. United States, 397 US 742 (1970) Santobello v. New York, 404 US 257 (1971) Herring v. New York, 422 US at 856-862, 863 (1975) US v. Ostrer, 422 F. Supp. 93 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)

xcii

US v. Splain, 545 F.2d 1131, 1134 (8th Cir. 1976) Arizona v. Washington, 434 US 497 (1978) Polk Country v. Dodgson, 454 US 312 (1981) United States v. Cronic, 466 US 648, 655 (1984) United States v. Mariani, 725 F. 2d 862, 865 (2d Cir. 1984) Young v. US, 470 US 1, 7 (1985) US v. Solivan, 937 F.2d 1146, 1151-2 (6th Cir. 1991) US v. Johnson, 968 F.2d 768, at 771-2 (8th Cir. 1992) Alex v. State, 930 S.W.2d 787, 791 (Texas Court of Appeal, 1996) Washington v. Hofbauer, 228 F.3d 689, 709 (6th Cir. 2000) People v. Santana (2000) 80 Cal. App. 4th United States v. Zaccaria, 240 F.3d 75 (1st Cir., 2001) Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) Herring v. US, 555 U.S. 135 (2009)