v.a. k hoze ( ippp, durham )

28
1 V.A. Khoze (IPPP, Durham) H Update on Exclusive Higgs Production KHARYS (in collaboration with Lucian HArland-Lang and Misha RYSkin)

Upload: elaine-hunt

Post on 01-Jan-2016

20 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Update on Exclusive Higgs Production. V.A. K hoze ( IPPP, Durham ). (in collaboration with Lucian HA rland-Lang and Misha RYS kin ). K HA RYS. H. Main Goal:. Current Status of CEP Theory. BY POPULAR DEMAND(Mike, Risto..). H. Forward Proton Taggers @ LHC as a gluonic Aladdin’s Lamp - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

1

V.A. Khoze (IPPP, Durham)

H

Update on Exclusive Higgs Production

KHARYS

(in collaboration with Lucian HArland-Lang and Misha RYSkin)

Page 2: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

2

H

Main Goal:

BY POPULAR DEMAND(Mike, Risto..)

Current Status of CEP Theory

Page 3: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

3

Forward Proton Taggers @ LHC as a gluonic Aladdin’s Lamp •Higgs Studies

•Photon-Photon, Photon - Hadron Physics. (PPS, AFP)

•‘Threshold Scan’: ‘Light’ New Physics … •Various aspects of Diffractive Physics (soft & hard ).

•High intensity Gluon Factory (underrated gluons) (~20 mln quraks vs 417 ‘tagged’ g at

LEP) QCD test reactions, dijet PP-luminosity monitor

FPTCould provide a unique additional tool to complement the conventional

strategies at the LHC.

Higgs is only a part of the broad EW, BSM and diffractive program@LHC wealth of QCD studies, glue-glue collider, photon-hadron, photon-photon interactions…

(CDPE) ~ 10 * (incl)

PRIOR TO THE LH

C START-UP

(PPS, AFP)

Page 4: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

4

Current situation

with ‘diffractive Higgs’

(post- LHC discovery)

We have to be open-eyed

Page 5: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

5

+ strong evidencefrom the Tevatron

4 July 2012

Page 6: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

6

The main advantages of CEP Higgs production

Prospects for high accuracy (~1%) mass measurement

(irrespectively of the decay mode). Quantum number filter/analyser. ( 0++ dominance ;C,P-even)

H ->bb opens up (Hbb Yukawa coupl.) (gg)CED bb in LO ; NLO,NNLO, b- mass effects – controllable.

For some scenarios CEP may become a discovery channel

A handle on the overlap backgrounds- Fast Timing Detectors (10 ps timing or better).

New leverage –proton momentum correlations (probes of QCD dynamics , CP- violation

effects…)

H

BSMPRIOR TO THE LH

C START-UP

currently ATLAS FP-420

(STFC cuttin

g rule)

CMS-PPS, Totem

ATLAS-AFP

Triple product correlation:

Integrated counting asymmetry (~10%)

(very important feature)

Page 7: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

7

CEP is reported by LHCb (DIS-11)

new CDF CEP results (PRL-2012)

All measurements in agreement with Durham group (pre)dictions.

(or LRGs)

CMS--first CEP results, more to

come

CEP through the eyes of the KRYSTHAL (2008-2013)

(Lucian’s talk)

(LHCb-first inclusive mid-July 2013)

Page 8: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

8

(MSSM update- Marek’s talk)

Page 9: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

9

Find a CEP re

sonance

and you have

confir

med its

quantum number

s!

Page 10: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

10

New Durham Studies

Account for the b-dependence of the survival factors (KMR,GLM-new results)

(known unknowns)

Improvements of models for soft diffraction: removing tensions with Totem data on and , agreement with the LHC results on low mass SD,(KMR, arXiv:1306.2149) agreement with the Tevatron/LHC data on CEP processes

subprogram to SuperCHIC to calculate S2 -KHARYS -13

(N)NLO-effects in hard ME.

(Uri’s talk)

Page 11: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

11

Signal-to-Background Ratio

(a brief reminder)

The largest signal, but large background and (most) difficult trigger

(other channels –too low rate).

Major theor. uncertainties cancel in the ratio, in particular survival factors, PDFs,..

Experimental efficiencies (trigger, b-tagging..) cancel.

Dominant non-PU backgrounds:

SM Higgs, 125 GeV

Main characteristics: 2007 (HKRTSW) values

Mass window ~4 GeV. g-b misID ~ 1.3%

cone size ~0.5.

S/B 1

Could be improved by a factor of 2 or so.

(420+420)

Page 12: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

12

non-PU backgrounds

Dijet-monitor for the Higgs yield

(requires detailed MC studies)

1.3%1% (CMS)

new detailed (post-2007) studies needed

(ccg-similar)

Andy Pilkington (CERN, Febr. 2013)

Page 13: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

13

Jeff Forshaw’s Conclusion on Higgs CEP Theory (CERN, 11. 04.2013, CERN), 1

Rg outside

Page 14: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

14

KMR-2000

One Step Forward, Two Steps Back (V.I.Lenin)

Page 15: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

15

Jeff Forshaw’s Conclusion on Higgs CEP Theory (CERN, 11. 04.2013, CERN) , 2.

(taken into account in SuperCHIC)

(in progress)

(nowadays GLM and KMR are in a broad agreement on survival )

Page 16: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

16

KMR(2000)- an extension of the results by DDT(1980) (ignored by some authors of the recent papers)

Recent analysis by Lucian Harland-Lung arXiv: 1306.6661)

Page 17: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

17

Page 18: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

18

Page 19: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

19

Page 20: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

20

Low MH MSSM scenario

(see for instance arXiv: 1302.7033, also NMSSM)

The LHC signal corresponds to the heavy CP-even Higgs boson.- SM like.

Light CP-even Higgs – heavily suppressed couplings to the gauge bosons.

The available parameter space is already affected by the current limits.

All 5 Higgs states have masses have masses of order 100 GeV

Rich phenomenology- but might be excluded bythe standard search channels at the LHC comparatively soon.

Recall also that the background is increasing with mass decreasing

(Marek’s talk)

Page 21: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

21

Page 22: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

22

Jury is still out

Page 23: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

23

Page 24: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

24

KRYSTHAL Col

subprogram for S2

Page 25: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

25

Page 26: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

26

JINST 4 (2009) T10001

Page 27: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

27

Page 28: V.A.  K hoze ( IPPP, Durham )

28

S/B may improve by a factor of ~2

~20 signal events