validation information for dns solutions

25
1 Joe Werne Colorado Research Associates Division NorthWest Research Associates, Inc. 3380 Mitchell Lane Boulder, CO 80301 [email protected] 303-415-9701 x 207 26 September 2005 Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Upload: jeremy-potts

Post on 02-Jan-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Validation Information for DNS Solutions. Joe Werne Colorado Research Associates Division NorthWest Research Associates, Inc. 3380 Mitchell Lane Boulder, CO 80301 [email protected] 303-415-9701 x 207 26 September 2005. Universal Symbols. = Experiment. = Simulation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

1

Joe Werne

Colorado Research Associates Division

NorthWest Research Associates, Inc.

3380 Mitchell Lane

Boulder, CO 80301

[email protected]

303-415-9701 x 207

26 September 2005

Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Page 2: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

= Experiment

= Simulation

Universal Symbols

Page 3: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Wind shear: Balloon Comparison

Chen, Kelley, Gibson-Wilde, Werne & Beland, Annales Geophysicae, 2001

Page 4: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Mixing Layers through the Troposphere and Stratosphere

CT2 RiT

Coulman, Vernin & Fuchs, Applied Optics 34 5461 (1995)

Page 5: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Ierkic, Woodman & Perillat, Radio Science 25, 941 (1990)

Radar Backscatter

Re ~ 106-107

120 m

Page 6: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

U.S. Air Force anemometry data

also, Michael Roggeman, private communication, 2001

Bruce Masson, 1996

β=Φ kC124.0)k( 2n

2nC β

Page 7: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Fort Collins Photo

Colorado Springs, Colorado, 2000 (photo by Tye Parzybok)

Page 8: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Denver Photo

Denver, Colorado, 1953 (photo by Paul E. Branstine)

Page 9: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Estes Park, 1979

Estes Park, Colorado, 1979 (photo by Bob Perney)

Page 10: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Joe’s Back Yard

Lafayette, Colorado, 2002 (photo by Joe Werne)

Page 11: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

DNS computed solutions

Kelvin-Helmholtz

Viscous & Thermal Dissipation

Page 12: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

CT2 fits from DNS

2nd-order structure-function fits

Werne & Fritts, 2000

Exponent between 2/5 and 2/3

Systematic dependence in x.

CT2 = 3.3 ε-1/3 χ

l0 = 7.4 lK

α=Δ rCT2r

α

2UC

ol

Page 13: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

CU2 fits from DNS

α=Δ rCU2r

2nd-order structure-function fits

Werne & Fritts, 2000

α

2UC

ol

Exponent between 2/5 and 2/3

CU2 = 2.1 ε2/3

l0 = 11.3 lK l0 = 8.0 lK

We have also computed structure-function fits for

V and W, but until recently data were not available.

Wroblewski, Cote, Hacker, Crawford, 2002

Page 14: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Comparison with Egrett

2nd-order structure-function fits

Werne & Fritts, 2000

Wroblewski, Cote, Hacker, Crawford, 2002

CV2/CU

2 CW2/CU

2 CU2/CT

2 CW2/CT

2

z, altitude (km)

CU2, CV

2, CW2, CT

2, exponents, inner scale all consistent with measurements.

CU2, CV

2, CW2, CT

2, exponents, inner scale all consistent with measurements.

Page 15: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Peak-to-midlayer ratios

Kelvin-Helmholtz: Balloon Comparison

Chen, Kelley, Gibson-Wilde, Werne & Beland, Annales Geophysicae, 2001

Page 16: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

CT2 fits, continuous in time

α

CT2

T Structure Function Fits Werne, Meyer, Bizon & Fritts, 2002

lo

time

z

time

x y

Page 17: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Combine Simulation and Observation for an operational path

Page 18: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Combine Simulation and Observation for an operational path

Page 19: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

CT2 RiT

Coulman, Vernin & Fuchs, Applied Optics 34 5461 (1995)

Combine Simulation and Observation for an operational path

Page 20: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Combine Simulation and Observation for an operational path

CT2 RiT

Coulman, Vernin & Fuchs, Applied Optics 34 5461 (1995)

Page 21: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

CT2 RiT

Coulman, Vernin & Fuchs, Applied Optics 34 5461 (1995)

Combine Simulation and Observation for an operational path

Page 22: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

CT2 RiT

Coulman, Vernin & Fuchs, Applied Optics 34 5461 (1995)

Combine Simulation and Observation for an operational path

Page 23: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

CT2 RiT

Coulman, Vernin & Fuchs, Applied Optics 34 5461 (1995)

Combine Simulation and Observation for an operational path

Page 24: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

CT2 RiT

Coulman, Vernin & Fuchs, Applied Optics 34 5461 (1995)

Combine Simulation and Observation for an operational path

Page 25: Validation Information for DNS Solutions

Conclusions

1. Stratification restricts mixing dynamics to vertically confined regions.

2. Entrainment zones maintain sharp thermal gradients that dominate optical effects.

3. Mixing in the interior of turbulent layers reduces thermal gradients.

4. Mixing zones in wind-shear simulations duplicate morphology exhibited by cloud observations.

5. Potential-temperature profiles, duration, CT2 profiles, and Ri

profiles agree with balloon measurements.

6. Turbulence constants Cθ and C (relating χ and Є to CT2 and CU

2) and CV

2/CU2 and CW

2/CU2 obtained from comparison with the middle of a

simulated shear layer agree with atmospheric measurements, as do the spectral slope and inner scale.

7. Entrainment zones are non-stationary, inhomogeneous, and anisotropic; unfortunately they also have the greatest impact on optical propagation.

8. Dynamic SGS is promising for stable stratification, but systematic dependence on filter width limits generality of method.

9. Improved modeling is required for further progress with LES. This is in progress.